Essentials in Church History

 

A History of the Church from the Birth of Joseph Smith to the Present Time  (1922), with Introductory Chapters on the Antiquity of the Gospel and the  “Falling Away”

 

By Joseph Fielding Smith of the Council of the Twelve, and Church Historian

 

Published by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

 

Salt Lake City, Utah  Deseret News Press  1922

 

 Copyright 1922, by Heber J. Grant, Trustee-in-Trust for the Church of Jesus  Christ of Latter-day Saints.

 

Electronic edition produced by the Mormon Texts Project. To report typos or  formatting errors, you can email mormontextsproject@gmail.com

 

Volunteers who helped with this book: Eric Heaps, Meridith Crowder, Byron Clark,  Jean-Michel Carter, Tod Robbins, Ben Crowder, Stephen Bruington, Benjamin  Bytheway.

 

Version 1.0

 

 Preface

 

The need of a history of the Church in one volume that can be used for general  reading, and at the same time meet the requirements of a text-book in the  priesthood quorums, Church schools and auxiliary organizations, for a long time  has been recognized. In the preparation of this volume, all these requirements  have been given thoughtful consideration. As the title of the book,  Essentials  in Church History, implies, the vital and essential points of history and  doctrine have been selected, and as far as possible, arranged in chronological  order. The doctrines and revelations given to the Prophet Joseph Smith have been  interwoven with the main story of the history in a manner, it is hoped, that  will prove to be both interesting and instructive to the casual reader, as well  as to the careful student. Moreover, the work has been prepared with the desire  that the arrangement of the material will stimulate in the reader a zeal for  further research and study of other and more extensive histories, particularly  the Documentary History of the Church, in six volumes, which covers the period  of the life of the Prophet Joseph Smith.

 

It is impossible to give, in one volume, in detail all the important incidents  in the history of the Church. However, this volume is sent forth on its mission  with the hope that it will answer fully the purpose for which it was written.

 

Grateful appreciation is hereby acknowledged for invaluable assistance given by  Dr. John A. Widtsoe, of the council of the twelve, in the preparation of the  manuscript. I also desire to express sincere thanks to Elders Edward H.  Anderson, J. M. Sjodahl, Andrew Jenson, August William Lund and others, who have  so willingly and cheerfully assisted in the preparation of the work.

 

Joseph Fielding Smith

 

Table of Contents

 

Part One   Introductory: The Gospel in Ancient and Mediaeval Times

 

Chapter 1. Antiquity of the Gospel

 

Chapter 2. The Falling Away

 

Chapter 3. The Protestant Revolution

 

Part Two   Opening of the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times

 

Chapter 4. Necessity for a Restoration

 

Chapter 5. The Ancestry of Joseph Smith

 

Chapter 6. Boyhood of Joseph Smith 

 

Chapter 7. The Vision

 

Chapter 8. The Visitation of Moroni

 

Chapter 9. Joseph Smith Receives the Record The Priesthood Restored

 

Chapter 10. The Witnesses of the Book of Mormon

 

Chapter 11. Revelation on Doctrine and Church Government

 

Chapter 12. Organization of the Church

 

Chapter 13. Beginning of the Public Ministry of the Church

 

Chapter 14. The Public Ministry of the Church (2)

 

Part Three   The Ohio and Missouri Period

 

Chapter 15. Removal of the Church in New York to Ohio

 

Chapter 16. The Land of Zion Its Dedication

 

Chapter 17. The Book of Commandments The Vision of the Glories The Hiram Mobbing

 

Chapter 18. Organization of the First Presidency Important Revelations

 

Chapter 19. Expulsion from Jackson County

 

Chapter 20. The Patriarchal Priesthood Zion’s Camp

 

Chapter 21. Choosing of the Twelve and Seventy Dedication of the Kirtland Temple

 

Chapter 22. Clay County Rejects the Saints Apostasy and Sorrow

 

Chapter 23. The Presidency Move to Missouri Excommunication of Oliver Cowdery  and Others

 

Chapter 24. Difficulties in Missouri Governor Boggs’ Order of Extermination

 

Chapter 25. Persecutions of the Saints

 

Chapter 26. The Expulsion from Missouri

 

Part Four   The Nauvoo Period

 

Chapter 27. The Founding of Nauvoo

 

Chapter 28. Foreign Missionary Labors

 

Chapter 29. Appeal to Washington for Redress Further Missouri Persecutions

 

Chapter 30. The Nauvoo Temple and Ordinances Therein Important Events

 

Chapter 31. Joseph Smith Accused as Accessory to Assault on Boggs

 

Chapter 32. Doctrinal Development and Prophecy

 

Chapter 33. Missouri’s Third Attempt to Capture Joseph Smith

 

Chapter 34. Joseph Smith’s Candidacy for President Nauvoo Conspiracy

 

Chapter 35. The Martyrdom

 

Chapter 36. The Succession of the Twelve Apostles Preparation to Leave Nauvoo

 

Part Five   The Settlement in the Rocky Mountains

 

Chapter 37. The Exodus from Nauvoo

 

Chapter 38. The Mormon Battalion

 

Chapter 39. The Pioneers

 

Chapter 40. In “the Land of Promise”

 

Chapter 41. Organization of the Presidency Church Activities

 

Chapter 42. Church Activities

 

Chapter 43. “The Utah War”

 

Chapter 44. The Mountain Meadows Massacre

 

Chapter 45. The Army in Utah

 

Chapter 46. A Period of Strife and Bitterness

 

Chapter 47. The Mission of Governor Shaffer and Judge McKean

 

Chapter 48. Church Colonization and Progress

 

Part Six   Recent Development

 

Chapter 49. The Second Period of Apostolic Presidency

 

Chapter 50. The Administration of President John Taylor

 

Chapter 51. The Administration of President Wilford Woodruff

 

Chapter 52. The Administration of President Lorenzo Snow

 

Chapter 53. The Administration of President Joseph F. Smith

 

Chapter 54. The Administration of President Heber J. Grant

 

Appendix

 

The Auxiliary Organizations of the Church

 

General Authorities of the Church

 

Stakes of Zion

 

Church Publications

 

List of Authorities and Books of Reference

 

Part One Introductory: The Gospel in Ancient and Mediaeval Times

 

Chapter 1  Antiquity of the Gospel

 

The Gospel Older than the Law

 

From the time of the exodus from Egypt until the advent of Jesus Christ the  Israelites were subject to the laws given to Moses. The belief is held by many  that when the Savior supplanted these laws with the Gospel it was the first  appearance among men of that great plan of salvation. The Gospel is much older  than the law of Moses; it existed before the foundation of the world. Its  principles are eternal, and were made known to the spirits of men in that  antemortal day when Jesus Christ was chosen to be the “Lamb slain from the  foundation of the world.” All necessary preparations were made in the spirit  life for the peopling of this earth in a mortal existence. It was there decided  that Adam should come to this earth and stand as the progenitor of the race.

 

The Fall of Man and His Redemption

 

That Adam and his posterity might gain the experience that can only be obtained  in mortality, it was necessary that he should break the law by which he was  governed in the Garden of Eden, and thereby subject himself and his posterity to  death. To gain an exaltation man must have experience and must exercise his free  will. Then, knowing both good and evil, by obeying the will of the Father he  will receive a reward for the good deeds done while in the flesh. The fall of  man brought temptation, sin and death. It was therefore essential that a  Redeemer be provided through whose atonement for the fall, all men, without  regard to their belief, race, or color, are entitled to come forth in the  resurrection of the dead, to be judged according to their works. “For since by  man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam  all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (1 Cor. 15:21 through 22).

 

Individual Salvation Taught to Adam

 

Individual salvation requires that a man must repent and accept the fulness of  the Gospel if he would be exalted in the kingdom of God. This plan of salvation  was taught to Adam after his expulsion from the Garden of Eden. He was baptized  in water for the remission of his sins, in the name of the only Begotten of the  Father, and received the Holy Ghost. He and his wife, Eve, were commanded to  teach their children the Gospel, that they also “might be sanctified from all  sin, and enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the  world to come, even immortal glory” (Moses ch. 6).

 

In obedience to this commandment Adam and Eve made all these things known to  their sons and daughters. Thus the Gospel was taught in the beginning and was  declared from generation to generation. Adam received the Holy Priesthood, which  was also conferred upon the patriarchs who followed after him. They were  “preachers of righteousness, and spake and prophesied, and called upon all men,  everywhere, to repent, and faith was taught unto the children of men” (Moses  6:22).

 

The Gospel Rejected in Days of Noah

 

In the days of Noah the Gospel was universally rejected, save by Noah and his  immediate family in all eight souls. Noah had labored diligently and long to  bring mankind to repentance, but without avail, “for all flesh had corrupted his  way upon the earth” (Moses 8:29). After the destruction of the wicked in the  flood, the Gospel continued to be taught by Noah and the later patriarchs, but  quite generally it was not received. Melchizedek, king of Salem, through his  faithfulness, became a great high priest, and the people of the Church in his  day honored him by calling the “Holy Priesthood after the order of the Son of  God,” by his name, “out of respect or reverence to the name of the Supreme  Being” (D.  & C. 107:4). From Melchizedek, Abraham received the Priesthood, and  to Melchizedek, as the properly authorized servant of the Lord, Abraham paid  tithes of all he possessed (Gen. 14:20).

 

The Covenant with Abraham

 

Unto Abraham also was the Gospel preached and the Lord made covenant with him  that through him and his posterity should all nations of the earth be blessed  (Gen. 22:18). This same Gospel was also declared to the children of Israel in  its simple truth; but they proved unworthy to receive it in its fulness, due to  their long sojourn in Egypt, where they had partaken of the customs, traditions  and theology of the Egyptians, and therefore “the word preached did not profit  them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it” (Heb. 4:2). The Lord  endeavored to establish the fulness of his Gospel and authority among them,  which Moses plainly taught, and he sought to sanctify the people, “that they  might behold the face of God; but they hardened their hearts and could not  endure his presence, therefore the Lord in his wrath (for his anger was kindled  against them) swore that they should not enter into his rest while in the  wilderness, which rest is the fulness of his glory” (D.  & C. 84:23 through 24).

 

The Higher Priesthood and the Carnal Law

 

It became necessary, therefore, for the Lord to take Moses and the Higher  Priesthood out of their midst, but the Lesser Priesthood, which holds the keys  of the ministering of angels and the preparatory Gospel faith, repentance and  baptism for the remission of sins he permitted to remain. To this he added the  carnal law, known as the law of Moses, which was added, so Paul informs us, as a  schoolmaster to prepare them to receive the fulness of the Gospel when restored  by Jesus Christ.

 

The Israelites, from the time they entered the promised land to the coming of  the Son of God, were living under the law of Moses, which laid upon them severe  and exacting restrictions because of their refusal to receive the fulness of the  Gospel when it was offered in the wilderness. When the Savior came, it was to  complete and fulfil the ends of this law, of which he said not one jot or title  should pass until all was fulfilled.

 

Dispensation of the Meridian of Time

 

In the Dispensation of the Meridian of Time, when the Savior ministered among  the Jews, he restored the Gospel with the Higher Priesthood. He called and  ordained Twelve Apostles and gave them power, before his ascension into heaven,  to complete the church organization, and commissioned them to carry the message  of divine salvation into all the world. In restoring that which had been taken  away, he annulled the carnal law, which had been added in the place of the  higher law, for it had filled the measure of its creation.

 

Commission of the Apostles

 

Under the commission Jesus gave the apostles to carry the Gospel message into  all the world and preach it to every creature, they commenced their active  ministry on the day of Pentecost, preaching in power to the convincing of many  souls. As the work of the ministry grew, and the assistance of other laborers  was required to carry on the work, men were divinely called and ordained to  specific offices in the Church. The Lord, himself, had called and ordained,  besides the twelve, seventies, and sent them forth throughout Judea bearing the  message of truth. When they returned from that missionary journey it was with  much rejoicing because even the devils were subject unto them. What other  officers the Lord ordained and set apart, the scriptures do not reveal. That the  Twelve Apostles were empowered to set in order all things pertaining to the  Church, is, nevertheless, beyond dispute. We learn that under their direction  and ministry, as branches were formed and the work of the ministry required it,  high priests, evangelists, patriarchs, elders, bishops, deacons, priests,  pastors and teachers were called into the service of the Church. The  organization was in this manner effected during the days of the apostles. The  Church was also blessed with the divine gifts and blessings of the Spirit of the  Lord in those early days, just as it was during the Savior’s ministry. There  were in the Church many prophets who uttered, by the gift of the Holy Ghost,  many remarkable predictions.

 

Essential Offices in the Church

 

All of these offices in the Church, are essential to the advancement of the  members and cannot be discarded with impunity. Paul said, the Lord “gave some  apostles; and some prophets; and some evangelists; and some pastors and  teachers; for the perfection of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for  the edifying of the body of Christ.” These were not merely to remain in the  Church during the formative period, or for a brief season in order to start the  work, and then to be replaced by other officers of another kind. Men were  ordained to these callings “for the edifying of the body of Christ, till we all  come to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a  perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ” (Eph.  4:12 through 13). Evidently, then, as long as there is imperfection in the Church among  the members, in doctrine, knowledge, or love, they fall short of “the stature of  the fulness of Christ.”

 

These officers are all needed and cannot justly be removed, for the Lord never  so intended. The writer of the epistle to the Ephesians also further compares  all these officers to the various parts of the human body and says: “From whom  the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint  supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part,  maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.” This same  apostle also likens the spiritual gifts to the physical body, declaring each to  be essential in the Church, just as the parts of the body are each necessary and  one part cannot say to another, “I have no need of you,” for all are necessary  that all men may “profit withal.”

 

Chapter 2 The Falling Away

 

The Body of the Church Destroyed

 

Notwithstanding that the early officers of the Church were endowed with the Holy  Priesthood and exercised the spiritual gifts, which were to remain until all  came “unto a perfect man unto the stature of the fulness of Christ,” there came  a great and terrible change, absolutely destroying the perfect body of the  Church. In its place arose a strange organization which eventually gained  dominion over the earth and ruled the destinies of men, not in love unfeigned,  but in blood and carnage most appalling, and with an iron hand.

 

The Falling Away Predicted

 

The rise of this power had been predicted by many of the prophets of old and by  the apostles of our Lord. Even the Savior, when instructing his disciples  regarding the signs of the times, intimated that this would occur. Isaiah, seven  centuries before the birth of Christ, predicted that the time would come when  the earth would be defiled under its inhabitants because of the transgression of  the law, the changing of ordinances and the breaking of the new and everlasting  covenant. It is evident that this was to occur in the latter days, and not in  the days of Israel’s subjection to the law, for the law of Moses was not an  everlasting covenant. This prophecy was to receive its consummation in the day  when the earth, defiled by the wickedness and corruption of its inhabitants,  should be cleansed by fire and few men left (Isaiah 24:1  through 6).

 

The Prophecies of Isaiah and Amos

 

Speaking of this event Isaiah says: “For the Lord hath poured out upon you the  spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers,  the seers hath he covered.” Shortly before this time, Amos also predicted that  the time would come when the Lord would send a famine in the land, “not a famine  of bread,” said he, “nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the  Lord.”

 

The Vision of Daniel

 

Daniel saw in vision the overthrow of the Church established by the Savior in  the meridian of time. In his vision of the four beasts, representing the  kingdoms seen by Nebuchadnezzar in his dream, he saw one horn, or power, come up  among the ten that succeeded the Roman Empire, “more stout than his fellows.”  This horn had eyes and a mouth that spake very great words against the Most  High, and three other kingdoms were subdued by this great horn. The same power  “made war with the saints and prevailed against them,” and through continued  conflict and exercise of might was able to “wear out the saints of the Most  High” and thought to “change times and laws.” This blasphemous power was to rule  until the coming of the Ancient of Days, when the kingdom and dominion was to  be “given to the people of the saints of the Most High whose kingdom is an  everlasting kingdom.”

 

Apostasy Commenced in Days of Apostles

 

The falling away from the faith commenced before the close of the ministry of  the apostles. Paul, when at Miletus taking his final departure from the elders  of Ephesus who had come to meet him, earnestly entreated them to take heed to  feed the Church of God, for, said he, “I know this, that after my departing  shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock, and of  yourselves shall men arise, speaking perverse things to draw away disciples  after them.” He also took occasion to warn the Saints at Thessalonica not to be  deceived regarding the ushering in of the second advent of the Son of God, “for  that day,” he wrote to them, “shall not come, except there come a falling away  first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth and  exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so that he  as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.”

 

The Predictions of Paul

 

The Saints at Galatia commenced very early to depart from the faith. Timothy was  warned by Paul, and instructed that in the last days perilous times would come  and men would be “lovers of their ownselves, covetous, boasters, proud,  blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural  affection, truce breakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of  those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more that  lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof.”  Moreover, he said the time would come, “when they will not endure sound  doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers,  having itching ears; and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and  shall be turned unto fables.”

 

Prophecy of Peter

 

Peter, likewise, by the spirit of prophecy, bore record of the departure from  the faith when he wrote to the Saints, saying: “But there were false prophets  also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who  privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought  them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their  pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.”  Then he sought to impress upon the minds of the Saints the fact that the  prophets before him had also predicted these direful events, saying: “That ye  may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and  of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Savior; knowing this  first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own  lusts, and saying: Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers  fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the  creation.”

 

The Mystery of Iniquity

 

As already stated, Paul declared to the Thessalonians that the “mystery of  iniquity” was already at work, and to Timothy he said: “All they which are in  Asia be turned away from me.” He had, we are led to believe, had some dispute  with Asiatic converts, for he wrote to Timothy in great sorrow because some of  his companions had forsaken him and were advocating doctrines contrary to the  Gospel of Jesus Christ. In trying to correct these evils he was left to contend  alone, for he adds: “At my first answer no man stood with me, but all men  forsook me.”

 

Decline of Spiritual Gifts

 

It was not long after the departure of the apostles that spiritual gifts ceased  to be manifest in the Church. The decline of these blessings, which are  inseparably connected with the Church of Christ, led to the belief, so prevalent  even in this day, that they were not to be continued, having been instituted in  the incipiency of the Church, merely as a means of aiding in its establishment,  after which they were no longer needed.

 

Revelation and heavenly communication also came to an end. There was no more  vision, for the people had closed their eyes. This condition also led to the  universal belief, which the world holds even now, that the canon of scripture is  full and there is to be no more scripture, notwithstanding the Lord has revealed  through his servants that revelation is to continue.

 

Changes in Church Government

 

The offices in the Priesthood were also changed because those unto whom the  Gospel was preached would not endure sound doctrine, but after their own lusts  heaped to themselves teachers having itching ears and were “men of corrupt  minds, reprobate concerning the faith.”

 

The Church Taken from Among Men

 

Instead of apostles and prophets there came, as time went on, a very different  ecclesiastical order from that instituted by the Lord. The Church established by  the Redeemer was taken from the earth because of continued persecution and  apostasy, until there was but a dead form of the true Church left. The great  ecclesiastical organization that arose and claimed to be the Church of Christ  was of gradual growth. The change from truth to error was not made all in one  day. It commenced in the first century and continued during the immediate  centuries that followed, until the Church established in the days of the  apostles was no more to be found among men. Without the direction of inspired  men, who could communicate with God, the change was a natural one.

 

Rise of the Church of Rome

 

In the beginning of the fourth century this great religious power, under the  Emperor Constantine became the state religion of the Roman Empire. From that  time forth its dominion spread and before many years had passed away it became  the ruling power in religion in the so-called civilized world. By it “times and  laws” were changed. The simple principles of the Christian faith were  embellished almost beyond recognition with pomp and mystic rites borrowed from  pagan worship. The priests and potentates, who officiated in these ceremonies,  no longer followed the simple customs of the humble fishermen of Galilee but,  dressed in splendid and costly robes, with mitres on their heads, they  performed their various parts in pride and with mystifying ceremonies that  over-awed and bewildered the humble people.

 

Changes in the Doctrines of the Church

 

The correct doctrine regarding the Godhead taught by Jesus Christ, was changed  into a mystery. The ordinance of baptism was changed from burial in the water  for the remission of sins, to sprinkling of a little water on the head.  Sprinkling of infants, miscalled baptism, a custom which “is mockery before God,  denying the mercies of Christ, and the power of the Holy Spirit,” became a fixed  and universal custom. Changes in the administration of the sacrament of the  Lord’s supper were also introduced, and the doctrine advanced that the bread and  wine became the flesh and blood of our crucified Redeemer, by  transubstantiation. Those who entered the ministry were forbidden to marry, and  many other changes, which need not be mentioned here, were made in the  principles of the Gospel, in the functions of the Priesthood and the worship of  the Lord.

 

Temporal Power of the Pope

 

Rome became the capital of this ecclesiastical power and the bishop or pope, as  he was called, its head. As its power grew it claimed dominion not only in  matter religious, but in civil affairs as well. During the acme of its glory it  ruled practically the known world. By it kings were made and by it they were  dethroned. Unless they bowed before the papal power in abject submission they  were made to feel the weight of its mighty hand.

 

Frederick Seebohm, in his Era of the Protestant Revolution, says: “Kings were  not secure on their thrones till they had the sanction of the Church. On the  other hand the clergy claimed to be free from prosecution under the criminal  laws of the land they lived in. They struggled to keep their own ecclesiastical  laws and their own ecclesiastical courts, receiving authority direct from Rome,  and with final appeal, not to the crown, but to the pope.”

 

“To establish an accusation against a bishop,” writes Motley, in his Rise of the  Dutch Republic, “seventy-two witnesses were necessary; against a deacon,  twenty-seven; against an inferior dignitary, seven; while two were sufficient to  convict a layman.”

 

Power of the Clergy

 

Few outside of the clergy were educated enough to read and write; therefore  priests became the lawyers, diplomats, ambassadors, instructors and prime  ministers in the nations. All learned men talked and wrote in Latin, which was  the language of Rome. It is said that for centuries a man convicted of a crime  in England, by showing that he could read or write, could claim the benefits of  a trial in the ecclesiastical court, which, “by long abuse came to mean  exemption from the punishment of the criminal law of the land.”

 

Not only did the priests fill these important offices where they were enabled to  wield great power and to control, very largely, the destinies of nations, but  many of them became extremely avaricious and “divined for money.” Jean de  Valdez, brother of the secretary to King Charles V, wrote of the times as  follows: “I see that we can scarcely get anything from Christ’s ministers but  for money; at baptism money, at bishoping money, at marriage money, for  confession money no, not extreme unction without money! They will ring no bells  without money, no burial in Church without money; so that it seemeth that  Paradise is shut up from them that have no money. The rich is buried in the  Church, the poor in the church-yard. The rich may marry with his nearest kin,  but the poor not so, albeit he be ready to die for love of her. The rich may eat  flesh in Lent, but the poor may not, albeit fish perhaps be much dearer. The  rich man may readily get large indulgences, but the poor none, because he  wanteth money to pay for them” (Era of the Protestant Revolution, p. 60).

 

In addition to all this they taxed the people in various ways, receiving a  tithing from all produce of the farms, a tenth of the land and of the wages of  the working man. Writes Motley: “Not content, moreover, with their territories  and their tithings, the churchmen perpetually devised new burdens upon the  peasantry. Plows, sickles, horses, oxen, all implements of husbandry were taxed  for the benefit of those who toiled not, but who gathered into barns.”

 

Sale of Indulgences

 

Some of these ecclesiastical rulers became so avaricious and filled with the  spirit of greed that they advanced the blasphemous doctrine of forgiving sins by  the sale of indulgences. It is claimed by the Church of Rome that these evils  were the sins of individuals who perverted the doctrine of the church in  relation to penance and forgiveness of sin. The indulgence was, according to  their teaching, “a pardon usually granted by the pope, through which the  contrite sinner escaped a part, or all, of the punishment which remained even  after he had been absolved. The pardon did not therefore forgive the guilt of  the sinner, for that had necessarily to be removed before the indulgence was  granted; it only removed or mitigated the penalties which even the forgiven  sinner would, without the indulgence, have expected to undergo in purgatory.”1

 

However, the sale of indulgences in various parts of Europe, was a means of  creating large fortunes for those who sanctioned it. There was no crime in the  category for which the power of forgiveness was not offered if the party seeking  it could pay the price. The various countries were districted and farmed for the  collection of these revenues, according to John Lathrop Motley, the historian,  who writes:

 

 “The price current of the wares offered for sale was published in every town and  village [in the Netherlands]. God’s pardon for crimes already committed, or  about to be committed, was advertized according to a graded tariff. Thus  poisoning, for example, was absolved for eleven ducats, six livres tournois.  Absolution for incest was afforded at thirty-six livres, three ducats. Perjury  came to seven livres and three carlines. Pardon for murder, if not by poison,  was cheaper. Even a parricide could buy forgiveness at God’s tribunal at one  ducat, four livres, eight carlines. Henry de Mountfort, in the year 1448,  purchased absolution for that crime at that price. Was it strange that a century  or so of this kind of work should produce a Luther? Was it unnatural that plain  people, who loved the ancient Church, should rather desire to see her purged of  such blasphemous abuses than to hear of St. Peter’s dome rising a little nearer  to the clouds on these proceeds of commuted crime? . . . The Netherlands, like  other countries, are districted and farmed for the collection of this papal  revenue. Much of the money thus raised remains in the hands of the vile  collectors. Sincere Catholics, who love and honor the ancient religion, shrink  with horror at the spectacle offered on every side. Criminals buying paradise  for money, monks spending the money thus paid in gaming houses, taverns, and  brothels; this seems to those who have studied their Testaments a different  scheme of salvation from the one promulgated by Christ. There has evidently been  a departure from the system of earlier apostles. Innocent conservative souls are  much perplexed; but at last all these infamies arouse a giant to do battle with  the giant wrong.”2

 

Thus were the prophecies of the scriptures fulfilled; the laws transgressed by a  power that exalted itself “above all that is called God” and in his sacred name  speaking “great words against the Most High.”

 

Notes

 

1.  History of Western Europe, p. 39, James Harvey Robinson.

 

2.  The Rise of the Dutch Republic, vol. 1, pp. 63  through 66, Motley.

 

Chapter 3 The Protestant Revolution

 

The “Dark Ages”

 

Not content with absolute dominion over the spiritual and temporal affairs of  the people, this papal kingdom attempted the exercise of authority also over the  consciences of men. Especially was this so during the dark ages, when this power  was at the zenith of its glory. This exercise of authority extended also far  into the day when the light of religious freedom commenced to break forth,  during the period known as the revival of learning. Previous to this revival, as  we have seen, the language of learning was the Latin tongue. The people were  helplessly dependent upon their priests for all instruction in scientific as  well as religious thought. The few copies of the Bible extant were guarded by  the clergy, and the scriptures were not accessible to the common people, and  since they could neither read nor write, and in very few instances understood  Latin, they would have been helpless even with the Bible in their hands. Under  these conditions it is not to be wondered at that the poor people of those  benighted countries of Europe, credulous and filled with superstitious fear,  were ready to accept almost anything that was made known to them, in doctrine or  deed, by unscrupulous priests.

 

The Revival of Learning

 

Neither is it to be wondered at that priests attempted to use force and coercion  during the revival of learning to check the opportunities of the people in  obtaining light and truth. It was due to the exercise of greater knowledge on  the part of the priests and their performance of mystic ceremonies, that  over-awed the people and enabled the clergy to keep them shackled by the chains  of ignorance and superstition. Ignorance was a ready tool in the hands of the  priests by which they shaped and moulded the masses into vessels to their  liking. The increase of learning among the people, aided by the discoveries and  inventions of the times, would change all this; for the people would not be so  ready to accept every wind of doctrine without some mental cogitation and desire  to have a reason given why things were thus and so. Moreover, the revival of  learning meant the end of many practices and blasphemous doctrines advanced in  the name of Jesus Christ, such as the exercise of force over the consciences of  men and the sale of indulgences for the pardon of sin if not the end, at least a  wonderful modification of such an evil system.

 

Early Translations of the Bible

 

Evidently this ruling ecclesiastical power realized that enlightened conditions  would bring rebellion against its authority. For that reason stringent laws were  framed to enforce the edicts and regulations of the church of Rome. During the  “Reformation” and before, there were several translations of the Bible made in  the languages which the common people understood. Wycliffe’s Bible appeared in  1380 and was followed by translations at a later date, both in English and other  tongues. At first there was an attempt to destroy these copies which were  prepared without authority or sanction from the Catholic Church. With the  invention of printing in the fifteenth century, however, the cause of religious  freedom received a wonderful impetus, and Bibles were distributed all over  Europe. Before the time of printing a Bible cost five hundred crowns, and such  copies as were in existence were in the keeping of the clergy, who guarded them  with the utmost zeal. Through the aid of printing, the price of Bibles was  reduced to five crowns, which made it possible for the people not only to have  the privilege of hearing the scriptures read in their own tongue, but also to  acquire the understanding by which they could read them for themselves.

 

Scripture-Reading Forbidden

 

An English chronicler, Henry Kneighton, many years before the “Reformation”  expressed the prevailing notion about the reading of the scriptures when he  denounced the general reading of the Bible, lamenting “lest the jewel of the  Church, hitherto the exclusive property of the clergy and divines, should be  made common to the laity.” Archbishop Arundel in England had issued an enactment  that “no part of the scriptures in English should be read, either in public or  in private, or be thereafter translated, under pain of the greater  excommunication.” The New Testament translation of Erasmus was forbidden at  Cambridge, and the Vicar of Croyden said from his pulpit: “We must root out  printing, or printing will root us out.” In the reign of Henry VIII the reading  of the Bible by the common people, or those who were not of the privileged  class, had been prohibited by act of Parliament, and men were burned at the  stake in England as well as in the Netherlands and other parts of Europe for  having even fragments of the scriptures in their hands.

 

For those who were considered derelict in church duties or heretical in  doctrine, edicts were declared, forbidding them to gather in private assemblies  for devotion, in various parts of Europe. All reading of the scriptures; all  discussion within one’s own doors concerning faith, the sacraments, the papal  authority, or other religious matter, was forbidden “under penalty of death. The  edicts were no dead letter. The fires were kept constantly supplied with human  fuel by monks who knew the act of burning reformers better than of arguing with  them. The scaffold was the most conclusive of syllogisms, and used upon all  occasions” (The Rise of the Dutch Republic, Motley).

 

The Inquisition

 

Continuing this woeful account of conditions in the rebellious Netherlands and  other countries under Spanish rule, the author of The Rise of the Dutch Republic  says: “Charles V introduced and organized a papal institution, side by side with  those horrible ‘Placards’ of his invention, which constituted a masked  inquisition even more cruel than that of Spain. . . . The execution of the  system was never permitted to languish. The number of Netherlanders who were  burned, strangled, beheaded, or buried alive, in obedience to his edicts, and  for the offense of reading the scriptures, of looking askance at a graven image,  or of ridiculing the actual presence of the body and blood of Christ in a wafer,  have been placed as high as one hundred thousand by distinguished authorities,  and have never been put at a lower mark than fifty thousand.”

 

Dawning of a Better Day

 

Conditions like these could not go on forever. The dawn of a better day began to  break over the nations. The Spirit of the Lord was striving with men and  preparations commenced for the introduction into the world of the re-established  Gospel at a later day. It was necessary that the shackles of superstitious fear  and illiteracy, which bound the world so completely, should be broken, that men  might exercise their right of free agency before the fulness of Gospel light  should break forth. Not only was advancement made in the art of printing, but  there came a revival of learning and research in all directions and in all parts  of Europe. It was not confined to one land or to one people, but the whole of  Europe took on a new life. The discovery of the telescope, the law of  gravitation, the invention of gunpowder and many other wonderful things, were  revolutionizing the thoughts of men.

 

The Mission of Columbus

 

With the discovery of the mariner’s compass navigators became more bold and  daring, and gradually extended their explorations until they discovered the way  to India around the Cape of Good Hope. Near the close of the fifteenth century  the belief prevailed that the earth was flat and inhabited only on the upper  side. Beyond the shores of lands then known it was thought there hung a pall of  fog and darkness. The sea was referred to as the “Sea of Darkness” beyond the  boundaries known to man. Far off in or beyond the ocean it was believed great  dragons had their lair, and if any man should be so unfortunate as to drift  among them he would return no more. Mariners had been afraid to traverse the  seas far beyond the sight of land. Shortly before the end of this century there  came one navigator more daring than his fellows, who proposed to cross the sea.  After many pleadings and attempts to interest some one with means in the  venture, he finally succeeded and the remarkable feat was done. In accomplishing  this he made discoveries that the Lord, in his wisdom, had kept hid from the  nations of the east all down through the ages, until in his own due time he  desired them to be revealed. Columbus was moved upon by the Spirit of the Lord  and crossed the waters in fulfilment of predictions made by a prophet, who lived  on this continent, five hundred years before the birth of Christ.

 

The “Reformation”

 

All these things played an important part in the establishment of individual and  religious freedom. The most important agency of all in this great work was  doubtless the so-called “Reformation,” which was in fact a revolution from the  bondage of the church of Rome. Great men of intellectual power began to  undermine the thraldom of the religious world. This rebellion against the  dominion of Rome was almost simultaneous in the various lands. In England,  Scandinavia, France, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Germany, many “reformers”  arose near the end of the fifteenth and during the sixteenth century. They were  of varying degrees of enthusiasm and opposition to the teachings of that time.  In the beginning their only desire was to correct evils within the Catholic  Church, but failing in this many of them openly rebelled and set up independent  churches of their own.

 

Martin Luther

 

The greatest of these “reformers” was Martin Luther in Germany, who did more  than any other individual in casting off the yoke of bondage placed upon the  people by the papacy. Powerful princes came to his aid, but there was not in  Germany at that time the cohesion of the people, or the centralization of power,  that existed in England under Henry VIII, or in Sweden, where Gustavus Vasa  reigned. Luther’s task, therefore, was a heavy one, but he nobly carried it  through to the bitter end.

 

The Protestant Revolution a Preparatory Work

 

Their mission was not, however, to set up the Church or Christ, for the time was  not ripe, and that important event was reserved for another generation. They  were called to be forerunners of that eventful day, and did much to prepare the  world for the ushering in of the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times. The Lord  did not call them to their great work by an opening of the heavens; by  visitation of angel, or direct communication, as in times of old; neither did  any of them claim that in this manner they had been called. Nevertheless it was  the Spirit of the Lord which rested upon them and inspired them to fight against  the abominations and practices of their times committed in the name of religion.  Such, at least, was the case with most of them. The motive of Henry VIII of  England, was a selfish one; yet the Lord brought good out of it in behalf of  religious freedom. At first Henry opposed the rebellion of Luther and others  most vigorously, even writing in defense of the pope of Rome, for which service  he received the benediction of the pope and the title of “Defender of the  Faith.” Afterwards, when his own interests where in conflict with the policy of  the Catholic Church and in no wise he could prevail, he became rebellious, with  the result that he was excommunicated by the pope. In defense he established an  independent church, known today as the Church of England, of which he became the  head. Parliament and the people were back of him and thus the great state church  of England was brought into being.

 

Disagreement Among “Reformers”

 

The pity of it all is that these “reformers” when they established their  religious freedom, could not agree among themselves. They were constantly in  turmoil, contending one with another on points of doctrine, which led to  considerable bitterness and the establishing of various and conflicting sects.  Moreover, they had not learned the lesson themselves, through all the  persecutions they were forced to suffer, that toleration was a fundamental  principle of freedom. Because this great lesson had not been learned the  persecuted became the persecutors in many cases, and were just as intolerant  where they had the power with those who disagreed with them as their enemies had  been with them.

 

America a Land of Freedom

 

Nevertheless the seeds of toleration had been sown, but they were of slow  growth. Toleration was a matter of education and therefore came by degrees and  could not burst forth in full fruition at once. Not until there had been much  shedding of blood in Europe, and more particularly in America during the war for  independence, were the people fully awakened to this truth. It required a  planting in new soil in a choice land above all other lands. Here in America  freedom and religious toleration became a fundamental part of our great  government. Our land became a land of refuge for the afflicted, the downtrodden,  and the oppressed of other nations, who found in the United States a haven of  rest; for this land had been dedicated to liberty by the shedding of blood.

 

Praise be to the great souls who conducted the Protestant Revolution. They  helped to make it possible for the establishment of the Church of Jesus Christ  of Latter-day Saints in the early part of the nineteenth century, preparatory to  the second coming of the Son of God. For all the good they did we honor them,  and they shall receive their reward which shall be great. They were not  restorers, but were sent to prepare the way for one who was yet to come with a  mission of restoration and everlasting power.

 

Part Two Opening of the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times

 

Chapter 4 Necessity for a Restoration

 

The Marvelous Work

 

The work of the Protestant revolution having been accomplished, and the land of  America having been prepared by the sowing of the seed of religious freedom, the  time for the restoration of the Gospel had arrived. The promise made by the  Savior that the Gospel of the kingdom should be preached in all the world for a  witness, was about to be fulfilled, and the Church of Jesus Christ was again to  be established in the earth. The “marvelous work and a wonder,” which Isaiah  predicted should come forth in the latter days, was about to make its  appearance, to the confounding of the wisdom of the worldly wise.

 

Reasonable and Scriptural to Expect a Restoration

 

It is reasonable as well as scriptural, to believe that the Lord, before he  shall come in judgment and to commence his reign of a thousand years, will send  a messenger to prepare the way before him. In justice the people should be  warned and given the privilege of repentance and remission of sins, through the  preaching of the Gospel, and have an opportunity for membership in the Church of  Christ. “Surely the Lord God will do nothing,” said Amos, “until he revealeth  the secret unto his servants the prophets.”1

 

Ancient Predictions to be Fulfilled

 

Many of the ancient prophets had spoken of the opening of the heavens and  revealing anew to man, the everlasting Gospel, before the second coming of the  Lord. The visitation of heavenly messengers, and the pouring out of the Spirit  of the Lord, in which the sons and daughters of Israel should prophesy, old men  dream dreams, and the young men see visions, were also foretold as events for  the latter days.  Daniel Saw Our Day

 

Daniel, in vision, while an exile at the court of Babylon’s great king, saw our  day and the work of setting up the kingdom which should be given to the Saints  of the Most High, who should possess it “even forever and forever.” The same  event he confirmed in the interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream of the  wonderfully constructed image. It was to be in the last days at a time when the  kingdoms represented by the toes of the image should bear rule. In that day the  God of heaven will “set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed, or left to  other people.”

 

Vision of John

 

John also saw the time when the Gospel should be declared by an angel flying in  the midst of heaven “having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that  dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people,  saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his  judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and  the fountains of waters.” This also was to be in the last day, when the people  were departed from the teachings of the Lord, and needed a call unto repentance,  for this angel was to be followed by another who should say: “Babylon is fallen,  is fallen;” and before Babylon should fall, she was to be warned and given a  chance of repentance.

 

Joseph Smith Divinely Called

 

It was necessary, therefore, that one should be chosen and clothed with power  from the Father to re-establish the Church of Jesus Christ on the earth.2 In  choosing a representative to stand at the head of this “great and marvelous  work, about to come forth unto the children of men,” the Lord did not select one  who was versed in the learning and traditions of the world. His ways are not the  ways of man, neither are his thoughts like the thoughts of men. One taught in  the learning of the world would have had too much to unlearn of the traditions  and philosophy of men. In his great wisdom, the Lord chose an unsophisticated  child a boy fourteen years of age. Unto this youth the Lord revealed the fulness  of the Gospel, which the world could not receive because of unbelief. Through  years of heavenly guidance for he was instructed by messengers from the presence  of the Lord this young man, Joseph Smith, was prepared to direct the work of the  restoration of the Gospel and the building of the Kingdom of God.

 

Notes

 

1.  Amos 3:7. The Prophet Joseph Smith’s revision.

 

2.  The erroneous idea which prevails in the world in relation to the Church, is  set forth in Smith’s Bible Dictionary, Article Church, vol. 1, p. 458, as  follows: “We have seen that according to the scriptural view the Church is a  holy kingdom, established by God on earth, of which Christ is the invisible  King it is a divinely organized body, the members of which are knit together  amongst themselves, and joined to Christ their Head, by the Holy Spirit, who  dwells in and animates it; it is a spiritual but visible society of men united  by constant succession to those who were personally united to the Apostles,  holding the same faith that the Apostles held, administering the same  sacraments, and like them forming separate, but only locally separate,  assemblies, for the public worship of God. This is the Church according to the  Divine intention. But as God permits men to mar the perfection of his designs in  their behalf, and as men have both corrupted the doctrines and broken the unity  of the Church, we must not expect to see the Church of Holy Scripture actually  existing in its perfection on earth. It is not to be found, thus perfect, either  in the collected fragments of Christendom, or still less in any one of these  fragments; though it is possible that one of those fragments more than another  may approach the scriptural and Apostolic ideal which existed only until sin,  heresy, and schism, had time sufficiently to develop themselves to do their  work.”

 

Chapter 5 The Ancestry of Joseph Smith. 1638 through 1805

 

Ancestry of Joseph Smith

 

Joseph Smith was born in Sharon, Windsor County, Vermont, December 23, 1805. He  was the third son and fourth child of Joseph and Lucy Mack Smith, who had a  family of ten children. His parents were of sturdy New England stock, honest,  godfearing, industrious, but poor in worldly substance. Joseph Smith had  descended on his paternal side from Robert Smith, who emigrated from England in  the year 1638. There is no record to be found of the ancestry of Robert Smith,  nor do we know at this time from what part of England he came, further than that  he went in his early youth to Boston, Lincolnshire, and then to London, where he  took ship for America. He landed in Boston, Massachusetts, and moved to that  part of Rowley, in Essex County, which afterwards became the township of  Boxford. Here, later, he purchased two hundred eight acres of land, a portion  of which was in Topsfield township. He married Miss Mary French. They were the  parents of ten children. Robert was known among his neighbors as a quiet,  unassuming man, devoted to the welfare of the settlement. Through his industry  he was able to provide some comforts for his family, who were reared in the  prevailing religious teachings of that day, but strictly in the knowledge of the  scriptures.

 

Patriotic Service of Samuel Smith

 

Samuel, son of Robert and Mary, was born January 26, 1666. He married Rebecca,  daughter of John Curtis, a prominent citizen of the town of Topsfield. After his  father’s death, Samuel moved to Topsfield, where he became an influential member  of that community and was honored by the citizens with several offices of trust.  He was the father of nine children. His son Samuel, born January 26, 1714, was  one of the most prominent citizens of Topsfield. The greater part of his life  was spent in the service of the people. He passed through the stormy days of the  American Revolution and bore arms in defense of the liberties of the people.  Among the many positions he held are the following: He was grand juryman in  1760; in 1770, road supervisor; in 1779, 1780, 1783, 1784 and 1785, on the  committee of safety; from 1771 to 1777 and in 1781 and 1782, assessor and  selectman in Topsfield, declining the honor in 1783; he was moderator, in  1758 through 60, 1762, 1764, 1766 through 73, 1777 through 80, and 1782 through 83; representative to the  General Court (House of Representatives) in 1764 through 70, 1772, 1777 through 78, and 1781;  town clerk in 1774, 1776 and 1777; delegate to the Provincial Congress at  Concord, October 11, 1774 and again January 19, 1775, and on the tea committee,  from Topsfield and acted as chairman, in 1773.

 

He was known as Captain Samuel Smith, receiving his military title during  service in the militia of Massachusetts. He married Priscilla, daughter of  Zacheus Gould of Topsfield. They had five children, two sons and three  daughters. The mother died shortly after the birth of her youngest child, and  Samuel married a cousin of his first wife who bore the same name. He died  November 22, 1785, leaving an estate valued at more than 544 pounds sterling.  The Salem Gazette of November 22, 1785, made mention of him in the following  words:

 

“Died. At Topsfield, on Monday, the 14th instant, Samuel Smith, Esq. So amiable  and worthy a character as he evidently appeared, both in public and private,  will render the memory of him ever precious. For a number of years he  represented the town in the General Court, where he was esteemed a man of  integrity and uprightness. His usefulness among those with whom he was more  immediately conversant was eminent. He was a sincere friend to the liberties of  his country, and a strenuous advocate for the doctrine of Christianity.”

 

“The memory of the Just be blessed.”

 

Asael Smith Grandfather of Joseph Smith

 

Asael Smith was the second son and youngest child of (2) Samuel. He was born in  Topsfield, March 7, 1744. His mother died, as already noted, shortly after his  birth. His early life was spent in Topsfield. February 12, 1767, he took to  wife, Mary Duty, of Windham, New Hampshire, and later moved to that place. From  there he went to Dunbarton and then to Derryfield, now the city of Manchester.  During the Revolution he followed the example of his illustrious father and  served with the Colonial forces. After the death of his father in 1785, he  returned to Topsfield and made his home on the family estate. He lived in the  old home, about one mile north of the town, where a number of his children were  born, notably Joseph, father of the Prophet Joseph Smith.

 

Asael was a man of very liberal views, far in advance of his time. Some of his  children were members of the Congregational Church, but in his religious views  he leaned towards the teachings of the Universalists. However, he held aloof  from all sects, because he could not reconcile his understanding of the  scriptures with their many conflicting creeds. He advocated the truth very  strongly, that all men should have free and equal religious liberty. In his  opinions he was frank and explicit, expressing himself without fear of the  prevailing opinions of his neighbors. He was somewhat gifted with the pen and  wrote some worthy sentiments which have been preserved and are still in  possession of members of the family. Many years before his death he wrote a  charge to his family in which the advice given could be followed with great  profit by parents and children even in our day. An excerpt from this document  will give an insight into the character of this man and depict his remarkable  faith in Jesus Christ:

 

Advice of Asael Smith to His Family

 

“And first to you, my dear wife,” he wrote, “I do with all the strength and  power that is in me, thank you for your kindness and faithfulness to me,  beseeching God who is the husband of the widow, to take care of you and not to  leave you nor forsake you, or suffer you to leave nor forsake him, nor his ways.  Put your whole trust solely in him, he never did nor never will forsake any that  trust in him. . .  . And now my dear children, let me pour out my heart to you  and speak first of immortality in your souls. Trifle not in this point; the soul  is immortal; you have to deal with an infinite Majesty; you go upon life and  death, therefore in this point be serious. Do all to God in a serious manner;  when you think of him, speak of him, pray to him, or in any way make your  addresses to his great Majesty, be in good earnest. Trifle not with his name or  with his attributes, nor call him to witness to any thing but is absolute truth,  nor then, but when sound reason or serious consideration requires it. And as to  religion, I would not wish to point out any particular way for you; but first I  would wish you to search the scriptures and consult sound reason and see if they  (which I take to be two witnesses that stand by the God of the whole earth) are  not sufficient to evince to you that religion is a necessary theme. .  . .

 

“For the public. Bless God that you live in a land of liberty and bear  yourselves dutifully and conscionably towards the authority under which you  live. See God’s providence in the appointment of the Federal Constitution and  hold union and order precious jewels.”

 

Prediction of Asael Smith

 

In the spring of 1791 he moved from Topsfield to Tunbridge, Vermont, where he  made his home for several years. As old age came on and his health became  impaired he removed to Stockholm, St. Lawrence County, New York, and made his  home with his son Silas. Here he died, October 31, 1830, at the advanced age of  more than 86 years. In stature he was tall, his body was well proportioned and  possessed of unusual strength. At times the spirit of inspiration rested upon  him. One one occasion he said: “It has been borne in upon my soul that one of my  descendants will promulgate a work to revolutionize the world of religious  faith.” Perhaps he did not expect to live to see that day, but such proved to  be the case. The first summer after the organization of the Church, his son  Joseph and grandson Don Carlos Smith paid him a visit and presented him with a  copy of the Book of Mormon. At the time he was in feeble health, but he  diligently read the book, or most of it, and said he was convinced that the work  of his grandson, Joseph Smith, was of divine origin. He was not baptized, due to  his weakened physical condition, and died shortly after this visit. His wife,  Mary Duty Smith, later moved to Kirtland where she died in 1836, firm in the  faith of the restored Gospel.

 

John Mack of Connecticut

 

On his maternal side, Joseph Smith was descended from John Mack, who was born in  Inverness, Scotland, March 6, 1653. John Mack came to America about 1669, and  resided, first in Salisbury, Massachusetts. He married Sarah, daughter of  Orlando and Sarah Bagley, and moved to Lyme, Connecticut, where eight or more of  their twelve children were born. He was the founder of the Mack family of  Connecticut. He died Feb. 24, 1721.

 

Ebenezer, son of John Mack, was born in Lyme, Conn., Dec. 8, 1697. He was a man  of thrift and was well respected by the people of Lyme, where he served for many  years as minister of the Second Congregational Church. He married Hannah,  daughter of Aaron Huntly, an honored citizen of Lyme. At one time Ebenezer Mack  possessed considerable property and “lived in good style commanding all the  attention and respect which are ever shown to those who live in fine  circumstances, and habits of strict morality.”1 Reverses came, however, and he  was reduced, in his declining years, to poverty. He was the father of nine  children.

 

Maternal Grandparents of Joseph Smith

 

Solomon, son of Ebenezer Mack, was born in Lyme, Conn., Sept. 26, 1735. At the  age of twenty-one years he enlisted in the services of his country under the  command of Captain Henry, and the regiment of Col. Whiting. He was engaged in  the king’s service with two teams carrying supplies to Fort Edwards. In 1748 he  enlisted under Major Spenser and was engaged in several bloody engagements in  which his life was spared miraculously. He served until the spring of 1759, when  he received his honorable discharge at Crown Point. That same year he met a  young school teacher, Lydia Gates, daughter of Nathan Gates, a wealthy citizen  of East Haddam, Connecticut. The friendship of these young people ripened and  they were married after a short acquaintance. In 1761 Solomon and his young wife  moved to Marlow where they took up their residence in a wilderness. Only four  other families resided within forty miles of them. It was while here he learned  to fully appreciate the excellent virtues of his wife, “For,” he writes, “as our  children were deprived of schools she assumed charge of their education, and  performed the duties of instructoress as none, save a mother, is capable of.  Precepts, accompanied with examples such as theirs, were calculated to make  impressions on the minds of the young, never to be forgotten. She, besides  instructing them in the various branches of an ordinary education, was in the  habit of calling them together both morning and evening, and teaching them to  pray, meanwhile urging upon them the necessity of love towards each other as  well as devotional feelings towards Him who made them.”

 

In this manner their children became confirmed in the virtues and were  established in faith in their Redeemer.

 

Patriotic Service of Solomon Mack

 

In 1776, Solomon Mack enlisted in the American army. For some time he served in  the land forces and later was transferred to the navy. With his two sons, Jason  and Stephen, he was engaged in a privateering expedition commanded by Captain  Havens. In this service they passed through some thrilling experiences, but  escaped without great harm. His service in the war covered a period of about  four years. After his discharge he went to Gilsum, New Hampshire, to make his  home. Owing to the rigorous campaigns through two wars, he became broken in  health and suffered considerably in his declining years. His son Stephen moved  to Vermont and later to Detroit, where he engaged in mercantile pursuits and was  one of the founders of Detroit. During the war of 1812 Stephen again entered the  services of his country. He held the commission of a captain at the time of the  siege of Detroit and was ordered by his superior officer to surrender, which he  boldly refused to do. Breaking his sword across his knee he threw the parts into  the lake and said he would not submit to such a disgraceful compromise while the  blood of an American ran in his veins.

 

Such is the character of the forebears of Joseph Smith.

 

Notes

 

1.  History of the Prophet Joseph, by Lucy Mack Smith.

 

Chapter 6 Boyhood of Joseph Smith. 1805 through 1820

 

The Birth of Joseph Smith, the Prophet

 

Joseph Smith, son of Asael, was born in Topsfield, July 12, 1771. Near the close  of the eighteenth century he was residing in Tunbridge, Vermont, where he owned  a good farm and engaged in tilling the soil. It was here he met Lucy Mack,  daughter of Solomon Mack, of Gilsum, who later became his wife. She was visiting  in Tunbridge with her brother Stephen, who at that time was a resident of  Tunbridge. Joseph Smith, after his marriage, continued to reside in Tunbridge  for about six years. In 1802 he rented his farm and moved to Randolph, to engage  in the mercantile business. Later he sold his farm in Tunbridge and moved to  Royalton, then to Sharon, Windsor County, where their son Joseph was born, Dec.  23, 1805. In 1811 the Smith family moved from Vermont to Lebanon, New Hampshire,  just over the border line, where they intended to settle down “and began to  contemplate, with joy and satisfaction” the prosperity which had attended their  exertions. They were desirous, as most parents are, to provide comfortably for  their children and give them the advantages of an education. Of this desire the  Joseph Smith mother writes:

 

Early Struggles of the Smiths

 

“As our children had, in a great measure, been debarred from the privilege of  schools, we began to make every arrangement to attend to this important duty. We  established our second son, Hyrum, in an academy at Hanover; and the rest, that  were of sufficient age, we were sending to a common school that was quite  convenient; meanwhile myself and companion were doing all that our abilities  would admit of for the future welfare and advantage of the family; and were  greatly blessed in our labors.”

 

These desires, however, were rudely shattered, for an epidemic of typhus fever  passed over the land and all the Smith children were sorely afflicted. The  oldest daughter, Sophronia, lay for a long time nigh unto death, and was saved  only by Divine providence in answer to prayer. Joseph recovered from the fever  after an illness of two weeks, but was left suffering with extreme pain in his  shoulder which was first treated as the result of a sprain, but later  developments proved it to be from another cause. A bag of pus had formed which  had to be lanced. The description of his suffering is very vividly told by his  mother in the following words:

 

Serious Affliction of Joseph Smith

 

“As soon as the sore had discharged itself, the pain left it, and shot like  lightning (using his own terms) down his side into the marrow of the bone of his  leg, and soon became very severe. My poor boy, at this, was almost in despair,  and he cried out, ‘Oh, father, the pain is so severe, how can I bear it!’

 

“His leg soon began to swell, and he continued to suffer the greatest agony for  the space of two weeks longer. During this period I carried him much of the time  in my arms in order to mitigate his suffering as much as possible; in  consequence of which I was taken very ill myself. The anxiety of mind that I  experienced, together with physical over-exertion, was too much for my  constitution, and my nature sank under it.

 

Tenderness of Hyrum Smith

 

“Hyrum who was rather remarkable for his tenderness and sympathy, now desired  that he might take my place, as he was a good, trusty boy we let him do so; and,  in order to make the task as easy for him as possible, we laid Joseph upon a low  bed, and Hyrum sat beside him, almost day and night, for some considerable  length of time, holding the affected part of his leg in his hands, and pressing  it between them so that his afflicted brother might be enabled to endure the  pain, which was so excruciating that he was scarcely able to bear it.

 

Surgical Aid Sought

 

“At the end of three weeks, we thought it advisable to send again for the  surgeon. When he came, he made an incision of eight inches on the front side of  the leg, between the knee and ankle. This relieved the pain in a great measure,  and the patient was quite comfortable until the wound began to heal, when the  pain became as violent as ever.

 

“The surgeon was called again, and he this time enlarged the wound, cutting the  leg even to the bone. It commenced healing the second time, and as soon as it  began to heal, it also began to swell again, which swelling continued to rise  till we deemed it wisdom to call a council of surgeons; and when they met in  consultation, they decided that amputation was the only remedy.

 

A Council Held

 

“Soon after coming to this conclusion, they rode up to the door, and were  invited into a room, apart from the one in which Joseph lay. They being seated,  I addressed them thus: ‘Gentlemen, what can you do to save my boy’s leg?’ They  answered, ‘We can do nothing; we have cut it open to the bone, and find it so  affected that we consider his leg incurable, and that amputation is absolutely  necessary in order to save his life.’

 

“This was like a thunderbolt to me. I appealed to the principal surgeon, saying,  ‘Dr. Stone, can you not make another trial? Can you not, by cutting around the  bone, take out the diseased part, and perhaps that which is sound will heal  over, and by this means you will save his leg? You will not, you must not, take  off his leg until you try once more. I will not consent to let you enter his  room until you make me this promise.’

 

“After consulting a short time with each other, they agreed to do as I had  requested, then went to see my suffering son. One of the doctors, on approaching  his bed, said, ‘My poor boy, we have come again.’ ‘Yes,’ said Joseph, ‘I see you  have; but you have not come to take off my leg, have you, sir?’ ‘No,’ replied  the surgeon, ‘It is your mother’s request that we make one more effort, and that  is what we have now come for.’

 

“The principal surgeon, after a moment’s conversation, ordered cords to be  brought to bind Joseph fast to the bedstead; but to this Joseph objected. The  doctor, however, insisted that he must be confined, upon which Joseph said very  decidedly, ‘No, doctor, I will not be bound, for I can bear the operation much  better if I have my liberty.’ ‘Then,’ said Dr. Stone, ‘will you drink some  brandy?’

 

“‘No,’ said Joseph, ‘not one drop.’

 

“‘Will you take some wine?’ rejoined the doctor. ‘You must take something, or  you can never endure the severe operation to which you must be subjected.’

 

“‘No,’ exclaimed Joseph, ‘I will not touch one particle of liquor, neither will  I be tied down; but I will tell you what I will do  I will have my father sit on  the bed and hold me in his arms, and then I will do whatever is necessary in  order to have the bone taken out.’ Looking at me, he said, ‘Mother, I want you  to leave the room, for I know you cannot bear to see me suffer so; father can  stand it, but you have carried me so much, and watched over me so long, you are  almost worn out.’ Then looking up into my face, his eyes swimming in tears, he  continued, ‘Now, mother, promise me that you will not stay, will you? The Lord  will help me, and I shall get through with it.’

 

“To this request I consented, and getting a number of folded sheets, and laying  them under his leg, I retired, going several hundred yards from the house in  order to be out of hearing.

 

The Operation

 

“The surgeons commenced operating by boring into the bone of his leg, first on  one side of the bone where it was affected, then on the other side, after which  they broke it off with a pair of forceps or pincers. They thus took away large  pieces of the bone. When they broke off the first piece, Joseph screamed out so  loudly, that I could not forbear running to him. On my entering the room, he  cried out, ‘Oh, mother, go back, go back; I do not want you to come in I will  try to tough it out, if you will go away.’ . . .

 

“I was immediately forced from the room, and detained until the operation was  complete; but when the act was accomplished, Joseph put upon a clean bed, the  room cleaned of every appearance of blood, and the instruments which were used  in the operation removed, I was permitted again to enter.

 

He is Healed

 

“Joseph immediately commenced getting better, and from this onward continued to  mend until he became strong and healthy. When he had so far recovered as to be  able to travel, he went with his uncle, Jesse Smith, to Salem, for the benefit  of his health, hoping the sea breezes would be of service to him, and in this he  was not disappointed.”

 

Removal to New York

 

Continued sickness pursued the family for a year; this, together with three  successive years of crop failure, placed the family in rather straitened  circumstances. So discouraged did they become that the decision was reached to  move to the milder climate and more fertile region of western New York, where  there would be a better opportunity to retrieve their fortunes.

 

As soon as arrangements could be made and obligations settled, Joseph Smith and  family moved to Palmyra, New York, a distance of about three hundred miles from  their home in New Hampshire. The members of the family now counseled together  relative to the course they should adopt. It was finally decided to purchase  about one hundred acres of land, situated about two miles south of Palmyra on  the border of Manchester township. It should be remembered that western New  York, at that time, was sparsely settled. Ohio, Michigan and Illinois were still  largely in a state of wilderness, and beyond the great “Father of Waters” lay a  vast country scarcely known. More than ten years later Missouri was spoken of by  the Lord to Joseph Smith, in a revelation as being on the “borders of the  Lamanites.”1

 

The Purchase of a Home

 

At the time of the removal to Palmyra, two of the boys, Alvin and Hyrum, were  able to be of material assistance in making their new home. With their father  they set to work clearing the newly acquired land from a heavy growth of timber,  a condition which generally prevailed in that country one hundred years ago.  During the first year they cleared about thirty acres no small task in  itself besides engaging in a day’s labor now and again, as opportunity afforded,  in order to raise means to meet their obligations. Thus, during the first year,  they were able to meet most of their first payment on the land, which during  that year was not in a condition to be farmed. The mother, through her untiring  industry, took upon herself the task to provide the household necessities,  which she did through the sale of hand-painted oil-cloth table covers, a work  in which she was quite skilled, and in which she met with fair success.

 

Removal to Manchester

 

About four years after the arrival of the Smith family in Palmyra, they moved to  the farm where they built a four-room log house, which was later increased by  the addition of sleeping rooms on the rear. It was while living in this house  that Joseph received his glorious visions. The building of a more commodious  home was contemplated under the direction of Alvin, the oldest son, who much  desired to see his parents comfortably located. “I am going to have,” he said,  “a nice, pleasant room for father and mother to sit in, and everything arranged  for their comfort, and they shall not work any more as they have done.” This was  indeed a noble thought and desire, for his parents had toiled and labored much  in the midst of trials and tribulations that had reduced them to a state of  poverty.

 

Death of Alvin Smith

 

Alvin did not live to realize the blessing thus contemplated and to see the  fulfilment of his dream. The frame of the new house was raised and the necessary  material procured to complete the structure in the fall of 1824; but in November  of that year Alvin was stricken. He died on the 19th day of that month in the  twenty-seventh year of his age. He lived to know of the visitation of the Father  and the Son, and of the coming of Moroni, and was convinced that these things  were true. He died with a prayer on his lips for his younger brother Joseph, and  admonished him to be true to the great work entrusted to his care. Alvin is  spoken of as a “youth of singular goodness and disposition, kind and amiable.”

 

The Hand of Providence

 

While hard to bear, the many misfortunes of the Smiths were all overruled by the  providence of the Lord, for their good. Had they remained in Vermont, or New  Hampshire, the purposes of the Lord could not as well have been accomplished. He  had a great work for the youthful Joseph to perform, and it was necessary that  the family should move to the field of his activities. Therefore, through the  valley of tribulation they were led by the hand of the Lord to the place he had  prepared for them.

 

Notes

 

1.  Doc. and Cov. 54:8.

 

Chapter 7 The Vision. 1820

 

Joseph Smith’s Own Story

 

Never has the story of the wonderful vision of the Father and the Son to Joseph  Smith been told so effectively and clearly as by Joseph Smith, himself, as he  has related it in complete simplicity. Therefore it is repeated here:

 

“Some time in the second year after our removal to Manchester, there was in the  place where we lived an unusual excitement on the subject of religion. It  commenced with the Methodists, but soon became general among all the sects in  that region of country. Indeed, the whole district of country seemed affected by  it, and great multitudes united themselves to the different religious parties,  which created no small stir and division amongst the people, some crying, ‘Lo,  here!’ and others, ‘Lo, there!’ Some were contending for the Methodist faith,  some for the Presbyterian, and some for the Baptist. For notwithstanding the  great love which the converts to these different faiths expressed at the time of  their conversion, and the great zeal manifested by the respective clergy, who  were active in getting up and promoting this extraordinary scene of religious  feeling, in order to have everybody converted as they were pleased to call it,  let them join what sect they pleased yet when the converts began to file off,  some to one party and some to another, it was seen that the seemingly good  feelings of both the priests and the converts were more pretended than real; for  a scene of great confusion and bad feeling ensued; priest contending against  priest, and convert against convert; so that all their good feelings one for  another, if they ever had any, were entirely lost in a strife of words and a  contest about opinions.

 

“I was at this time in my fifteenth year. My father’s family was proselyted to  the Presbyterian faith, and four of them joined that church, namely my mother  Lucy; my brothers Hyrum and Samuel Harrison; and my sister Sophronia.

 

A Time of Religious Excitement

 

“During this time of great excitement, my mind was called up to serious  reflection and great uneasiness; but though my feelings were deep and often  poignant, still I kept myself aloof from all these parties, though I attended  their several meetings as often as occasion would permit. In process of time my  mind became somewhat partial to the Methodist sect, and I felt some desire to be  united with them; but so great were the confusion and strife among the different  denominations, that it was impossible for a person young as I was, and so  unacquainted with men and things, to come to any certain conclusion who was  right and who was wrong. My mind at times was greatly excited, the cry and  tumult were so great and incessant. The Presbyterians were most decided against  the Baptists and Methodists, and used all the powers of either reason or  sophistry to prove their errors, or, at least to make the people think they  were in error. On the other hand, the Baptists and Methodists in their turn were  equally zealous in endeavoring to establish their own tenets and disprove all  others.

 

The Promise of James Tested

 

“In the midst of this war of words and tumult of opinions, I often said to  myself, What is to be done? Who of all these parties are right; or, are they all  wrong together? If any one of them be right, which is it, and how shall I know  it? While I was laboring under the extreme difficulties caused by the contests  of these parties of religionists, I was one day reading the Epistle of James,  first chapter and fifth verse, which reads: If any of you lack wisdom, let him  ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall  be given him.

 

“Never did any passage of scripture come with more power to the heart of man  than this did at this time to mine. It seemed to enter with great force into  every feeling of my heart. I reflected on it again and again, knowing that if  any person needed wisdom from God, I did; for how to act I did not know, and  unless I could get more wisdom than I then had, I would never know; for the  teachers of religion of the different sects understood the same passages of  scripture so differently as to destroy all confidence in settling the question  by an appeal to the Bible. At length I came to the conclusion that I must either  remain in darkness and confusion, or else I must do as James directs, that is,  ask of God. I at length came to the determination to ‘ask of God,’ concluding  that if he gave wisdom to them that lacked wisdom, and would give liberally and  not upbraid, I might venture. So, in accordance with this my determination to  ask of God, I retired to the woods to make the attempt. It was on the morning  of a beautiful clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred and twenty. It  was the first time in my life that I had made such an attempt, for amidst all my  anxieties I had never as yet made the attempt to pray vocally.

 

The Vision

 

“After I had retired to the place where I had previously designed to go, having  looked around me, and finding myself alone, I kneeled down and began to offer up  the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was  seized upon by some power which entirely overcame me, and had such an  astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak.  Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were  doomed to sudden destruction.

 

“But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver me out of the power of  this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the very moment when I was ready to  sink into despair and abandon myself to destruction not to an imaginary ruin,  but to the power of some actual being from the unseen world, who had such  marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being just at this moment of  great alarm, I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness  of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.

 

“It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held  me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two personages, whose brightness  and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake  unto me, calling me by name, and said, pointing to the other This is my beloved  Son, hear Him!

 

“My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects  was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get  possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the personages who  stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right and which I should  join. I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and  the personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in  his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that ‘they draw near to me  with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; they teach for doctrines the  commandments of men, having a form of godliness but they deny the power  thereof.’ He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things  did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself  again I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven.

 

“When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some  degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother enquired what  the matter was. I replied, ‘Never mind, all is well I am well enough off.’ I  then said to my mother, ‘I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not  true.’

 

Sectarian Opposition

 

“It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very early period of my life,  that I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why  should the powers of darkness combine against me? Why the opposition and  persecution that arose against me almost in my infancy?

 

“Some few days after I had this vision, I happened to be in company with one of  the Methodist preachers, who was very active in the before-mentioned religious  excitement; and, conversing with him on the subject of religion, I took occasion  to give him an account of the vision which I had had. I was greatly surprised at  his behavior; he treated my communication not only lightly, but with great  contempt, saying it was all of the devil, that there were no such things as  visions or revelations in these days; that all such things had ceased with the  apostles, and that there would never be any more of them.

 

“I soon found, however, that my telling the story had excited a great deal of  prejudice against me among professors of religion, and was the cause of great  persecution, which continued to increase; and though I was an obscure boy, only  between fourteen and fifteen years of age, and my circumstances in life such as  to make a boy of no consequence in the world, yet men of high standing would  take notice sufficient to excite the public mind against me, and create a bitter  persecution; and this was common among all the sects all united to persecute me.

 

Joseph Smith’s Reflections

 

“It caused me serious reflection then, and often has since, how very strange it  was that an obscure boy, a little over fourteen years of age and one, too, who  was doomed to the necessity of obtaining a scanty maintenance by his daily  labor, should be thought a character of sufficient importance to attract the  attention of the great ones of the most popular sects of the day, and in a  manner to create in them a spirit of the most bitter persecution and reviling.  But strange or not, so it was, and it was often the cause of great sorrow to  myself. However, it was nevertheless a fact that I had beheld a vision. I have  thought since, that I felt much like Paul, when he made his defense before King  Agrippa, and related the account of the vision he had when he saw a light and  heard a voice; but still there were but few who believed him; some said he was  dishonest, others said he was mad; and he was ridiculed and reviled. But all  this did not destroy the reality of his vision. He had seen a vision, he knew he  had, and all the persecution under heaven could not make it otherwise; and  though they should persecute him unto death, yet he knew, and would know to his  latest breath, that he had both seen a light and heard a voice speaking unto  him, and all the world could not make him think or believe otherwise.

 

“So it was with me. I had actually seen a light, and in the midst of that light  I saw two personages, and they did in reality speak to me; and though I was  hated and persecuted for saying that I had seen a vision, yet it was true; and  while they were persecuting me, reviling me, and speaking all manner of evil  against me falsely for so saying, I was led to say in my heart: Why persecute me  for telling the truth? I have actually seen a vision, and who am I that I can  withstand God, or why does the world think to make me deny what I have actually  seen? For I had seen a vision; I knew it, and I knew that God knew it, and I  could not deny it, neither dared I do it, at least I knew that by so doing I  would offend God, and come under condemnation.

 

“I had now got my mind satisfied so far as the sectarian world was concerned;  that it was not my duty to join with any of them, but to continue as I was until  further directed. I had found the testimony of James to be true, that a man who  lacked wisdom might ask of God, and obtain, and not be upbraided.”

 

Joseph Smith’s Great Honor

 

There is no account in history or revelation extant, where ever before both the  Father and the Son appeared in the presence of mortal man in glory. Most  wonderful was the honor bestowed upon this unsophisticated boy. Great was his  faith so great that he was able, like the brother of Jared, to penetrate the  veil and behold the glory of these holy Beings, whose glory rested upon him.  Without this power overshadowing him, he could not have endured their presence,  for their brightness was far greater than the brightness of the noonday sun. It  was not, therefore, with the power of the natural eye that this great Vision was  beheld, but by the aid of the eye of the spirit. The natural man, without the  saving grace of the power of the Lord, could not behold his presence in this  manner, for he would be consumed. Joseph Smith, through the power of the Lord,  was able to behold the presence of the Great Creator and his Glorified Son, for  they deigned to honor him with their presence and converse with him.

 

The Heavens No Longer Sealed

 

No longer were the heavens as brass. No more would man be forced to stumble and  grope in darkness. Salvation was made known and the glad tidings were to sound  forth, as with the blast of a mighty trumpet, to the ends of the earth. Satan’s  reign was nearing its end, and the message of eternal peace was shortly to be  proclaimed to every nation, and kindred, and tongue and people.

 

The Vision Rejected by the World

 

No wonder Joseph Smith rejoiced, he now possessed greater knowledge than all the  professors and divines in all the world! Naturally he desired that others should  share his joy and partake of his wonderful information. He would proclaim it to  them with gladness, surely they would be pleased to receive it and would rejoice  with him! But great disappointment awaited him, for with one accord his message  was rejected. Only the members of his household would believe. He was treated  with scorn by great men of learning, although he was but a boy. He was mocked  and shamed. Instead of the spirit of love and gratefulness following him for  revealing this glorious message of truth, it was the spirit of contempt and  hatred with which he had to contend. In sorrow he learned to hold his peace and  wait wait for further light and inspiration which he had been promised. Though  all the world should mock and former friends deride, he knew he had beheld the  Vision. There was one Friend to whom he now could go and pour out his soul in  humble hope of encouragement and succor. What did it matter though the whole  world should laugh, if the Son of God would hearken to his humble pleadings?

 

Not Strange that the Message Should be Rejected

 

Yet, when we stop to reflect, it is not strange that this message of light and  truth should be rejected by the world, for the Lord had said long years before,  “Men love darkness rather than light, because their deeds are evil.” As for the  priests, was not their craft in danger? The message left with the youthful seer  by the God of heaven was most drastic. It had been declared in language that  could be clearly understood, that the creeds of men were not in accord with his  Gospel. This was not a message to please the religious teachers of the day.  Moreover, the Vision had shattered the traditions of the times. The doctrines  taught in the churches were emphatically contradicted and disproved. The world  was teaching and believing that the canon of scripture was full; that there was  not to be and could not be, more revelation; that the visitation of angels had  ceased with the early Christian fathers, and such things as these had passed  away forever. Again, the doctrine was taught that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost  were incomprehensible, without body, parts and passions. A revelation of the  Father and the Son as separate persons, each with a body tangible and in the  form of the body of man, was destructive of this doctrine, as revelation was of  the doctrine of the closed heavens. The world had held that perfection in  religion and the organization of the Church of Christ was not to be expected,  but that men were led by their own human reason to interpret the word of the  Lord as set forth in the scriptures.

 

A Bold Denunciation of False Doctrine

 

A bold denunciation of all such false teachings and traditions, although told in  confiding simplicity by a humble youth, fourteen years of age, was not likely to  bring rejoicing and peace of mind to those who thus believed and loved their old  traditions dearly. Nevertheless the story must be told; for in the world were  thousands of honest souls who were likewise praying that the light of the  everlasting Gospel would be restored, and the message of salvation again be  proclaimed as a witness before the end of unrighteousness should come.

 

Chapter 8 The Visitation of Moroni. 1823 through 1827

 

Life of Joseph Smith Between 1820 through 23

 

“I continued to pursue my common vocations in life until the twenty-first of  September, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-three, all the time suffering  severe persecution at the hands of all classes of men, both religious and  irreligious, because I continued to affirm that I had seen a vision.

 

“During the space of time which intervened between the time I had the vision and  the year eighteen hundred and twenty-three  having been forbidden to join any of  the religious sects of the day, and being of very tender years, and persecuted  by those who ought to have been my friends and to have treated me kindly, and if  they supposed me to be deluded to have endeavored in a proper and affectionate  manner to have reclaimed me I was left to all kinds of temptations; and,  mingling with all kinds of society, I frequently fell into many foolish errors,  and displayed the weakness of youth, and the foibles of human nature; which, I  am sorry to say, led me into divers temptations, offensive in the sight of God.  In making this confession, no one need suppose me guilty of any great or  malignant sins. A disposition to commit such was never in my nature. But I was  guilty of levity, and sometimes associated with jovial company, etc., not  consistent with that character which ought to be maintained by one who was  called of God as I had been. But this will not seem very strange to any one who  recollects my youth, and is acquainted with my native cheery temperament.

 

“In consequence of these things, I often felt condemned for my weakness and  imperfections; when, on the evening of the above mentioned twenty-first of  September, after I had retired to my bed for the night. I betook myself to  prayer and supplication to Almighty God for forgiveness of all my sins and  follies, and also for a manifestation to me, that I might know of my state and  standing before him; for I had full confidence in obtaining a divine  manifestation, as I previously had one.

 

The Appearing of Moroni

 

“While I was thus in the act of calling upon God, I discovered a light appearing  in my room, which continued to increase until the room was lighter than at noon  day, when immediately a personage appeared at my bedside, standing in the air,  for his feet did not touch the floor. He had on a loose robe of most exquisite  whiteness. It was a whiteness beyond anything earthly I had ever seen; nor do I  believe that any earthly thing could be made to appear so exceedingly white and  brilliant. His hands were naked, and his arms also, a little above the wrists;  so, also, were his feet naked, as were his legs, a little above the ankles. His  head and neck were also bare. I could discover that he had no other clothing on  but this robe, as it was open, so that I could see into his bosom. Not only was  his robe exceedingly white, but his whole person was glorious beyond  description, and his countenance truly like lightning. The room was exceedingly  light, but not so very bright as immediately around his person. When I first  looked upon him, I was afraid; but the fear soon left me.

 

The Book of Mormon Revealed

 

“He called me by name, and said unto me that he was a messenger sent from the  presence of God to me, and that his name was Moroni; that God had a work for me  to do; and that my name should be had for good and evil among all nations,  kindreds, and tongues, or that it should be both good and evil spoken of among  all people. He said there was a book deposited, written upon gold plates, giving  an account of the former inhabitants of this continent, and the source from  whence they sprang. He also said that the fulness of the everlasting Gospel was  contained in it, as delivered by the Savior to the ancient inhabitants; also,  that there were two stones in silver bows and these stones, fastened to a breast  plate, constituted what is called the Urim and Thummim  deposited with the  plates; and the possession and use of these stones were what constituted seers  in ancient or former times; and that God had prepared them for the purpose of  translating the book.

 

Moroni Quotes Ancient Prophets

 

“After telling me these things, he commenced quoting the prophecies of the Old  Testament. He first quoted part of the third chapter of Malachi, and he quoted  also the fourth or last chapter of the same prophecy, though with a little  variation from the way it reads in our Bibles. Instead of quoting the first  verse as it reads in our books, he quoted it thus:

 

“For behold, the day cometh that shall burn as an oven and all the proud, yea,  and all that do wickedly, shall burn as stubble; for they that come shall burn  them, saith the Lord of Hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.

 

“And again, he quoted the fifth verse thus: Behold, I will reveal unto you the  Priesthood, by the hand of Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great  and dreadful day of the Lord.

 

“He also quoted the next verse differently: And he shall plant in the hearts of  the children the promises made to the fathers, and the hearts of the children  shall turn to their fathers; if it were not so, the whole earth would be utterly  wasted at its coming.

 

“In addition to these, he quoted the eleventh chapter of Isaiah, saying that it  was about to be fulfilled. He quoted also the third chapter of Acts,  twenty-second and twenty-third verses, precisely as they stand in our New  Testament. He said that that prophet was Christ; but the day had not yet come  when they who would not hear his voice should be cut off from among the people,  but soon would come. He also quoted the second chapter of Joel, from the  twenty-eighth verse to the last. He also said that this was not yet fulfilled,  but was soon to be. And he further stated that the fulness of the Gentiles was  soon to come in. He quoted many other passages of scripture, and offered many  explanations which cannot be mentioned here.

 

Moroni’s Admonition

 

“Again, he told me, that when I got those plates of which he had spoken for the  time that they should be obtained was not yet fulfilled I should not show them  to any person; neither the breastplate with the Urim and Thummim; only to those  to whom I should be commanded to show them; if I did I should be destroyed.  While he was conversing with me about the plates, the vision was opened to my  mind that I could see the place where the plates were deposited, and that so  clearly and distinctly that I knew the place again when I visited it.

 

“After this communication, I saw the light in the room begin to gather  immediately around the person of him who had been speaking to me, and it  continued to do so, until the room was again left dark, except just around him,  when instantly I saw, as it were, a conduit open right up into heaven, and he  ascended till he entirely disappeared, and the room was left as it had been  before this heavenly light had made its appearance.

 

The Second Appearance of Moroni

 

“I lay musing on the singularity of the scene, and marveling greatly at what had  been told to me by this extraordinary messenger; when, in the midst of my  meditation, I suddenly discovered that my room was again beginning to get  lighted, and in an instant, as it were, the same heavenly messenger was again by  my bedside.

 

“He commenced, and again related the very same things which he had done at his  first visit, without the least variation; which having done, he informed me of  great judgments which were coming upon the earth, with great desolations by  famine, sword, and pestilence; and that these grievous judgments would come on  the earth in this generation. Having related these things, he again ascended as  he had done before.

 

The Third Appearance of Moroni

 

“By this time, so deep were the impressions made on my mind, that sleep had fled  from my eyes, and I lay overwhelmed in astonishment at what I had both seen and  heard. But what was my surprise when again I beheld the same messenger at my  bedside, and heard him rehearse or repeat over again to me the same things as  before; and added a caution to me, telling me that Satan would try to tempt me  (in consequence of the indigent circumstances of my father’s family), to get the  plates for the purpose of getting rich. This he forbade me, saying that I must  have no other object in view in getting the plates but to glorify God, and must  not be influenced by any other motive than that of building His kingdom;  otherwise I could not get them. After this third visit, he again ascended into  heaven as before, and I was again left to ponder on the strangeness of what I  had just experienced; when almost immediately after the heavenly messenger had  ascended from me the third time, the cock crowed, and I found that day was  approaching, so that our interviews must have occupied the whole of that night.

 

The Fourth Appearance of Moroni

 

“I shortly after arose from my bed, and, as usual, went to the necessary labors  of the day; but, in attempting to work as at other times, I found my strength so  exhausted as to render me entirely unable. My father, who was laboring along  with me, discovered something to be wrong with me, and told me to go home. I  started with the intention of going to the house; but, in attempting to cross  the fence out of the field where we were, my strength entirely failed me, and I  fell helpless on the ground, and for a time was quite unconscious of anything.  The first thing that I can recollect was a voice speaking unto me, calling me by  name. I looked up, and beheld the same messenger standing over my head,  surrounded by light as before. He then again related unto me all that he had  related to me the previous night, and commanded me to go to my father and tell  him of the vision and commandments which I had received. I obeyed; I returned to  my father in the field, and rehearsed the whole matter to him. He replied to me  that it was of God, and told me to go and do as commanded by the messenger. I  left the field, and went to the place where the messenger had told me the plates  were deposited; and owing to the distinctness of the vision which I had had  concerning it, I knew the place the instant that I arrived there.

 

The Hill Cumorah

 

“Convenient to the village of Manchester, Ontario county, New York, stands a  hill of considerable size, and the most elevated of any in the neighborhood. On  the west side of this hill, not far from the top, under a stone of considerable  size, lay the plates, deposited in a stone box. This stone was thick and  rounding in the middle on the upper side, and thinner towards the edges, so that  the middle part of it was visible above the ground, but the edge all around was  covered with earth.

 

“Having removed the earth, I obtained a lever, which I got fixed under the edge  of the stone, and with a little exertion raised it up. I looked in, and there  indeed did I behold the plates, the Urim and Thummim, and the breastplate, as  stated by the messenger. The box in which they lay was formed by laying stones  together in some kind of cement. In the bottom of the box were laid two stones  crossways of the box, and on these stones lay the plates and the other things  with them.

 

“I made an attempt to take them out, but was forbidden by the messenger, and was  again informed that the time for bringing them forth had not yet arrived,  neither would it, until four years from that time; but he told me that I should  come to that place precisely in one year from that time, and that he would there  meet with me, and that I should continue to do so until the time should come for  obtaining the plates.

 

The Four Annual Visits to the Hill

 

“Accordingly, as I had been commanded, I went at the end of each year, and at  each time I found the same messenger there, and received instruction and  intelligence from him at each of our interviews, respecting what the Lord was  going to do, and how and in what manner His kingdom was to be conducted in the  last days.

 

“As my father’s worldly circumstances were very limited, we were under the  necessity of laboring with our hands, hiring out by day’s work and otherwise, as  we could get opportunity. Sometimes we were at home and sometimes abroad, and by  continued labor, were enabled to get a comfortable maintenance.”

 

Temptation of Joseph Smith

 

As Joseph Smith journeyed to the Hill Cumorah on that memorable first visit, he  was beset by many conflicting emotions. His father’s family was poor and in  financial distress. Creditors had been bearing down heavily upon them. The  adversary of all righteousness took advantage of these conditions to sorely  tempt the youth with all his power. The plates of the book were made of gold and  were of great intrinsic value. Could they not be used to relieve the financial  embarrassment of the family? Or was there not some thing else deposited with  the plates that might be used for such purpose? Such were the thoughts Satan put  into his heart as he approached the hill, and the admonition of the angel was  temporarily forgotten.

 

He had no difficulty in locating the spot where the records were hidden.1 It was  the matter of but a moment to scrape away the grass and dirt and with a lever  pry loose the stone which served as a covering to the box containing the sacred  treasure. There before him, lying on two stones which were crosswise of the box,  he beheld the record. With it were the Urim and Thummim, two transparent stones  set in bows of silver and attached to the breastplate all as the angel had  described. He was enraptured. Putting forth his hand he attempted to remove the  plates, but received a shock, which in a measure deprived him of his strength.  After a moment’s hesitation he made a second attempt, but received a greater  shock than at first. The cause of this was unknown to him, for he had supposed  that physical strength and exertion were all that were necessary for him to  obtain the record. The third time he stretched forth his hand to take the plates  and again received a shock with considerable violence, which sapped his strength  and made him powerless. In his great excitement and without meditation he  exclaimed: “Why cannot I obtain the book?” “Because you have not kept the  commandments of the Lord,” answered a voice near by him. Looking up he was  astonished to behold the heavenly messenger of his former visits.

 

Powers of Good and Evil Shown

 

In humble repentance he sought the Lord in prayer. His vision was opened and the  glory of the Lord shone round about him, and he was made to feel the sweet  influence of the power of righteousness. While he was beholding this vision the  angel said, “Look!” Joseph beheld the prince of darkness surrounded by his  innumerable train of associates in all their diabolical fury. As the visions of  evil passed before him the angel said: “All this is shown, the good and the  evil, the holy and impure, the glory of God and the power of darkness, that you  may know hereafter the two powers and never be influenced or overcome by that  wicked one. Behold, whatever entices and leads to good and to do good, is of  God, and whatever does not is of that wicked one. It is he who fills the hearts  of men with evil, to walk in darkness and blaspheme God; and you may learn from  henceforth, that his ways are to destruction; but the way of holiness is peace  and rest.”2

 

Joseph was further informed that the record had been deposited for the sake of  the glory of the Lord, for they contained the fulness of the Gospel as it was  given to the ancient inhabitants of this American continent, and was to be  brought forth by the power of God; and moreover that the translation would go  forth to the Gentiles, many of whom would believe afterwards it should go to the  house of Israel many of whom should also be brought into the Church of Christ.

 

Value of the Prophet’s Lesson

 

The lesson taught to Joseph Smith on this occasion was one of lasting benefit to  him. Henceforth he understood the power of the evil one and was prepared to  resist temptation. Years afterwards, when speaking of this event he said, “Ever  afterwards I was willing to keep the commandments of God.” Had the lesson not  been taught in this manner, at a later day he might have fallen into temptation  when off his guard, with results that would have brought disaster.

 

The Interval of Four Years

 

During the interval of four years, from 1823 to 1827, Joseph Smith was under the  necessity of aiding his father’s family in paying their debts and procuring a  living. At times he found employment at home and at times abroad, as opportunity  afforded. The death of his oldest brother Alvin, in 1824, made it all the more  needful that he exert himself for the benefit of the family. In October, 1825,  he entered the employ of an aged gentleman named Josiah Stowel. Mr. Stowel had  heard of some old Spanish silver mines in Harmony, Pennsylvania, and employed  his hired help in searching for the hidden treasure. Joseph, after about one  month of fruitless search, persuaded this kindly gentleman to forsake the  foolish venture. From this employment came the cry that Joseph Smith, the  “Mormon” Prophet, was a “money-digger.”

 

The Prophet’s Marriage

 

While residing in Harmony and in the employment of Mr. Stowel, Joseph boarded at  the home of Mr. Isaac Hale. It was here, and under these conditions, that he met  Miss Emma Hale, daughter of Isaac Hale. The friendship of these young people  ripened into love, and they were married about one year and three months later,  January 18, 1827, by Squire Tarbill, in South Bainbridge, New York.

 

Notes

 

 1. The following description of Cumorah is from the pen of Oliver Cowdery:

 

 You are acquainted with the mail road from Palmyra, Wayne County, to  Canandaigua, Ontario County, New York, and also, as you pass from the former to  the latter place, before arriving at the little village of Manchester, say from  three to four, or about four miles from Palmyra, you pass a large hill on the  east side of the road. Why I say large, is because it is as large, perhaps, as  any in that country. To a person acquainted with this road a description would  be unnecessary, as it is the largest and rises the highest of any on that route.  The north end rises quite sudden until it assumes a level with the more  southerly extremity, and I think I may say an elevation higher than at the south  a short distance, say half or three-fourths of a mile. As you pass toward  Canandaigua it lessens gradually until the surface assumes its common level, or  is broken by other smaller hills or ridges, water courses and ravines. I think I  am justified in saying that this is the highest hill for some distance round,  and I am certain that its appearance, as it rises so suddenly from a plain on  the north, must attract the notice of the traveler as he passes by.  Messenger  and Advocate, 1834, page 158.

 

2.  See Improvement Era, vol. 2, p. 807.

 

Chapter 9 Joseph Smith Receives the Record The Priesthood Restored. 1827 through 1829

 

Joseph Receives the Record

 

Each year, on the twenty-second day of September, between the years 1823 and  1827, Joseph went to the Hill Cumorah, as the angel had instructed him, where he  was taught in matters pertaining to his sacred duties. At last the time arrived  for the delivery of the plates, the Urim and Thummim, and the breastplate. It  was the 22nd day of September, 1827. The Prophet went to the hill to keep the  final appointment with Moroni, before the record should be given into his hands.  Once more the angel instructed him in his duties and impressed upon his mind  the great responsibility now to be placed upon him, saying:

 

 “Now you have got the record into your own hands, and you are but a man,  therefore you will have to be watchful and faithful to your trust or you will be  overpowered by wicked men; for they will lay every plan and scheme that is  possible to get it away from you, and if you do not take heed continually, they  will succeed. While it was in my hands, I could keep it, and no man had power to  take it away, but now I give it up to you. Beware, and look well to your ways,  and you shall have power to retain it.”1

 

Moreover, he was told, if he let the record go out of his hands or neglected his  duty, he should be cut off, but through faithfulness and perseverance he should  be protected until the angel should come for the record and again take it into  his keeping.

 

Designs of the Wicked Frustrated

 

Joseph soon found that the warning of the angel was all too true concerning the  powers of darkness being arrayed against him, and the desire of evil-disposed  persons to destroy him and obtain the plates. Scarcely was the record in his  possession before strenuous exertions were made by wicked persons to get them  out of his hands. Every scheme and invention which the powers of darkness could  devise, were used. Conjurors, diviners with peepstones and other means were  employed. Mobs gathered and searched the premises of the Smith home, even  breaking into the house and ransacking it. Under pretext of law searches were  made. At times it became necessary to hide the record in strange places. Once  they were hidden in a hollow log in the woods; again, under the hearthstone in  the house, and under the floor in a nearby shop. When the Prophet departed for  Pennsylvania he hid them in a barrel of beans, and when a search was made they  were not discovered. The Lord was with him in his labor and the powers of  darkness were overcome and of no avail.

 

Martin Harris

 

So intense and bitter became the opposition in Manchester that the Prophet  sought a place of refuge in another locality. Having received an invitation from  his wife’s parents to come to their home in Harmony, Pennsylvania, he accepted  the invitation and prepared to go. Being very poor he experienced some  difficulty in procuring the necessary means to meet his obligations and make the  journey. In this hour of distress, and in the midst of persecution, he found a  friend in Martin Harris, of Palmyra, New York. Joseph, with his wife’s brother,  Alva Hale, had gone to Palmyra to transact some business, and while there he was  approached by Martin Harris, who said to him: “How do you do, Mr. Smith? Here  are fifty dollars. I give this to you to do the Lord’s work with; no, I give it  to the Lord for His own work.” Joseph offered to take the money and give his  note which Alva Hale also agreed to sign, but Martin Harris refused to take the  note. This money enabled the Prophet to make the journey to Harmony where he  found a haven of rest.

 

Removal to Pennsylvania

 

Shortly after this event Joseph moved to Harmony, Susquehanna County,  Pennsylvania, to the home of Isaac Hale. Later he purchased from Mr. Hale a  small farm, to which he removed. Here in comparative peace he commenced to make  a copy of the characters on the plates, which consisted of the learning of the  Jews and the language, in hieroglyphics, of the Egyptians. He also, by Urim and  Thummim, made a translation of some of them. This was done between December,  1827, and the February following. In the month of February, 1828, Martin Harris  came to Harmony to visit with Joseph Smith. He had been much impressed with the  Prophet’s story and desired to know more concerning the work.

 

The Prophecy of Isaiah Fulfilled

 

Martin Harris took the transcript that had been made together with the partial  translation, and departed for New York. Just what his object was, and what he  had in mind, is not made clear. That he was led to do so by inspiration was  later shown. He first submitted the characters to Professor Charles Anthon of  Columbia College with the request that he examine them. He then took them to Dr.  Samuel L. Mitchell, also of New York. When Martin returned he made the following  report:

 

 “I went to the city of New York, and presented the characters which had been  translated, with the translation thereof, to Professor Charles Anthon, a  gentleman celebrated for his literary attainments. Professor Anthon stated that  the translation was correct, more so than any he had before seen translated from  the Egyptian. I then showed him those which were not yet translated, and he said  that they were Egyptian, Chaldaic, Assyrian and Arabic; and he said they were  true characters. He gave me a certificate, certifying to the people of Palmyra  that they were true characters, and that the translation of such of them as had  been translated was also correct. I took the certificate and put it into my  pocket, and was just leaving the house when Mr. Anthon called me back, and asked  me how the young man found out that there were gold plates in the place where he  found them. I answered that an angel of God had revealed it unto him.

 

“He then said to me, ‘Let me see that certificate.’ I accordingly took it out of  my pocket and gave it to him, when he took it and tore it to pieces, saying,  that there was no such thing now as ministering of angels, and that if I would  bring the plates to him, he would translate them. I informed him that part of  the plates were sealed, and that I was forbidden to bring them. He replied, ‘I  cannot read a sealed book.’ I left him and went to Mr. Mitchell, who sanctioned  what Professor Anthon had said respecting both the characters and the  translation.”

 

A number of years later, when he discovered the use to which his testimony had  been given, Professor Anthon denied the statement of Martin Harris, although he  did confess that such a person called to see him with such characters, but he  treated it as a hoax. There may be some slight errors in the account of Martin  Harris, but in the main his story must be true for it is the fulfilment of an  ancient prophecy of Isaiah2  almost word for word. It is not likely that Martin  Harris was familiar with the prophecy of Isaiah at that time and without  question Professor Anthon had no intention of fulfilling prophecy in making his  answer, but nevertheless such proved to be the case.

 

The Lost Manuscript

 

The impression made on the mind of Martin Harris by this interview resulted in  his removal to Harmony to give further aid to Joseph Smith. He arrived about the  12th of April, 1828, and immediately commenced to write as the Prophet dictated  his translation of the record. Martin continued in this work until the 14th of  June, at which time one hundred and sixteen pages of manuscript on foolscap  paper had been prepared. Some time after Martin Harris commenced to write he  importuned the Prophet for the privilege of taking the manuscript home and  showing it to some skeptical friends, who had sorely criticized him for the part  he was taking in the work. He was desirous of convincing them; and they had,  without doubt, pleaded with him to do this thing. Especially had his wife  implored him for a look at the manuscript.

 

The Prophet inquired by Urim and Thummim, and the request of Martin was denied.  However he was not satisfied and importuned and pleaded with Joseph again to  inquire of the Lord. This he did, but the answer was the same as before. Still  Martin implored, and so insistent and prolonged were his pleadings that Joseph  Smith again, the third time, inquired of the Lord. This time the answer was  favorable. The request was granted on certain positive conditions. Martin was to  show the manuscript to his brother, Preserved Harris, his wife, his father and  mother and his wife’s sister, Mrs. Cobb. No other person was to see the  writings. In a most solemn covenant Martin bound himself to this agreement. When  he arrived home, and pressure was brought to bear upon him, he forgot his solemn  oath and permitted others to view the manuscript, with the result that by  stratagem it passed out of his hands.

 

The Lord was displeased with Joseph Smith for his constant importuning, and took  from him the Urim and Thummim after the departure of Martin Harris with the  partial translation from the plates. When the fact was known that Martin had  lost the manuscript, the Prophet suffered the torments of the damned. He found  no rest; there was no peace of conscience. In the bitterness of his soul he  feared to approach the Lord. This condition continued for some time until one  day the angel appeared to him, and returned the Urim and Thummim, that he might  through them receive a revelation from the Lord. (Doc. & Cov. Sec. 3.) In this  revelation it was made known that the purposes of the Lord were not frustrated,  but the designs of men. Joseph was soundly rebuked and warned against yielding  to temptation. Nevertheless the mercy of the Lord was extended to him because of  his severe punishment and sore repentance. After the revelation was received,  both the Urim and Thummim and the plates were taken from him, but in a few days  were restored again. This was the most bitter lesson Joseph Smith ever received.  It seemed necessary to prepare him for the great responsibilities yet before  him.

 

A few days later Joseph received another revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 10) in  which he was forbidden again to translate the portion of the record which had  been lost. Satan had put it into the hearts of wicked men, the revelation  declared, to alter the writing of the manuscript and then, if Joseph Smith  should translate again, they would say that he could not do it twice alike, and  thus they would catch him in his words which he had pretended to translate.

 

What the Lost Record Contained

 

The lost manuscript contained the abridgment made by Mormon of the record of  Nephi, from the time Lehi left Jerusalem down to the reign of King Benjamin, or  to the words of Mormon, in the Book of Mormon. When Mormon made his abridgment  of the records of the Nephites, the Lord directed him to attach also the small  plates of Nephi, which contained the record of the people covering the same  period of time as the abridgment down to the reign of King Benjamin. In this  manner there were two accounts of that history, the abridgment and the original.  Now the translation of the abridgment was lost; but the better account could  still be translated, and the designs of Satan be defeated. Thus the “wise  purpose” of the Lord, in directing Mormon to include Nephi’s plates, was made  known to Joseph Smith.

 

The Coming of Oliver Cowdery

 

Martin Harris was never permitted to act as scribe again. For a time the Prophet  was without assistance. For several months he was under the necessity of  “laboring with his hands” on his small farm in Harmony and otherwise seeking  employment. The work of the Lord was lagging. He must be about his mission. He  prayed to the Lord for help. On the 6th of April, 1829, a young school teacher,  Oliver Cowdery, came to Harmony to inquire of Joseph Smith regarding his work.  Oliver Cowdery had been teaching school near the home of the Smiths in  Manchester, and part of the time boarded with that family. From them he learned  of the Prophet’s vision, the coming of Moroni, and of the plates. He had a  feeling that these stories were true and desired to investigate at close  quarters. He was convinced of the truth of Joseph’s story, and two days after  his arrival in Harmony commenced to write as the Prophet translated from the  record. Later in the month of April the Lord gave to Oliver a revelation through  Joseph Smith in which he was called to the work. In that revelation things were  revealed that only Oliver Cowdery knew. From that time forth he continued to act  as the amanuensis for Joseph Smith, until the Book of Mormon was finished.

 

Restoration of the Aaronic Priesthood

 

While translating, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery discovered that the question  of baptism for the remission of sins was mentioned several times in the record.  This caused them to marvel, for the doctrine of baptism was misunderstood in the  world. They concluded to inquire of the Lord for light. On the 15th day of May,  1829, they retired to the woods and prayed for instruction on this question.  While thus engaged in prayer a heavenly messenger descended in a cloud of light  and said that he was John, known as John the Baptist in the New Testament. He  said he acted under the direction of Peter, James and John, who held the keys  of the Melchizedek Priesthood, and had been sent to confer on Joseph and Oliver  the Aaronic Priesthood, which holds the keys of the temporal Gospel. He laid his  hands upon their heads and said:

 

 “Upon you my fellow servants, in the name of Messiah, I confer the Priesthood of  Aaron, which holds the keys of the ministering of angels, and of the Gospel of  repentance, and of baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; and this  shall never be taken again from the earth, until the sons of Levi do offer again  an offering unto the Lord in righteousness.”

 

He stated that the Melchizedek Priesthood would soon he conferred upon them and  that Joseph Smith should be called the first and Oliver Cowdery the second elder  of the Church.

 

Joseph and Oliver Baptized

 

This messenger, after conferring the Priesthood, instructed Joseph and Oliver to  go down into the water and baptize each other. After which they were to lay  hands upon each other and re-confer the Priesthood which he had bestowed upon  them. There are two reasons why they should be commanded to do this thing.  First, to confer the Priesthood before baptism, is contrary to the order of the  Organized Church, therefore they were commanded to confer the Priesthood upon  each other in the regular way, after they were baptized. Second, the angel did  for them that which they could not do for themselves. There was no one living in  mortality who held the keys of this Priesthood, therefore it was necessary that  this messenger, who held the keys of the Aaronic Priesthood in the Dispensation  of the Meridian of Time, should be sent to confer this power. It is contrary to  the order of heaven for those who have passed beyond the veil to officiate and  labor for the living on the earth, only wherein mortal man cannot act, and  thereby it becomes necessary for those who have passed through the resurrection  to act for them. Otherwise John would have followed the regular order, which is  practiced in the Church, and would have first baptized Joseph Smith and Oliver  Cowdery and then conferred upon them the Aaronic Priesthood.

 

As the angel had commanded them, they repaired to the water where Joseph first  baptized Oliver and then Oliver baptized Joseph. Immediately after coming out of  the water they experienced great and glorious blessings, and being filled with  the Holy Spirit, began to prophesy of the coming forth of the Church and the  establishment of the great work of the Lord in the latter days. Their minds were  now enlightened and the scriptures were opened to their understandings. For the  first time in many centuries there now stood on the earth men with power to  officiate in baptism for the remission of sin.

 

The fear of opposition compelled them to keep secret the matter of their  ordination and baptism, except where they revealed it to a few personal friends,  whom they could trust.

 

Restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood

 

In course of time, and very shortly after the coming of John the Baptist, Joseph  and Oliver received the Melchizedek Priesthood from Peter, James and John. The  date when this Priesthood was conferred is unknown, but it was only a few days  after the first ordination. In a revelation given in 1842 (Doc. & Cov. Sec. 128)  we are informed that it was between Harmony, Pennsylvania, and Colesville, New  York, on the Susquehanna River, where it was conferred. In another revelation  given in September 1830, we are informed that the restoration was under the  hands of Peter, James and John, “whom I have sent unto you, by whom I have  ordained you and confirmed you to be apostles, and special witnesses of my  name” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 27).

 

Help from Joseph Knight

 

While the work of translating was going on the Lord sent a friend in time of  need to give material assistance to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery. This was  Joseph Knight, Sen., of Colesville, Broome County, New York. Having heard of the  manner in which Joseph and Oliver were occupying their time, Mr. Knight brought  them provisions from time to time, a distance of some thirty miles, and thus  enabled them to continue their labor without interruption, which otherwise would  have delayed the work.

 

Joseph and Oliver Remove to Fayette

 

It was not destined that the work of translation should go on in Harmony without  interruption. Opposition finally made itself manifest and became so strong that  even Isaac Hale a man who believed in justice, law and order, but who did not  express much faith in the mission of Joseph Smith became somewhat bitter in his  feelings. The necessity of a change of residence was apparent. Oliver Cowdery  wrote to a young friend, David Whitmer of Fayette, New York, with whom he had  previously corresponded regarding the coming forth of the Book of Mormon,  desiring that he would come and take Joseph and himself to the Whitmer home in  Fayette. This David Whitmer consented to do, and the removal was made in June,  1829.

 

When David was on the journey to Harmony on this mission, he was met some  distance from the town of Harmony by Joseph and Oliver. In referring to this  circumstance some years later, David Whitmer wrote: “Oliver told me that Joseph  had informed him when I started from home, where I stopped the first night, how  I read the sign at the tavern, where I stopped the next night, etc., and that I  would be there that day for dinner, and this is why they had come out to meet  me. All of which was exactly as Joseph had told Oliver, at which I was greatly  astonished” (Millennial Star, vol. 40:769 through 774).

 

At the Whitmer Home

 

When they arrived in Fayette, they found Mr. Peter Whitmer, father of David,  ready to receive them and anxious to know more concerning the work, Joseph and  Oliver received their board free at the Whitmer home, and other timely  assistance was also given them by members of the Whitmer family. David, John and  Peter Whitmer, Jr., became very zealous in the work. The Lord spoke to each of  them by revelation, calling them to cry repentance to their generation. The  people of Seneca County, in which Fayette was situated, were friendly, and many  houses were opened by those desiring to know more of the Prophet’s message. Many  were convinced and showed a willingness to obey the Gospel. Hyrum Smith, who had  come to Fayette, David Whitmer and Peter Whitmer, Jr., were baptized, the first  by the Prophet and the others by Oliver Cowdery. Samuel H. Smith, younger  brother of the Prophet, had been baptized while the Prophet and Oliver were in  Harmony, Pennsylvania. He was the third person baptized in this dispensation,  receiving the remission of his sins on the twenty-fifth day of May, 1829, just  ten days after the appearing of John the Baptist; Oliver Cowdery baptizing him.  Samuel had accompanied Oliver from Manchester to Harmony early in April when  Oliver came to inquire concerning the Prophet and the record he claimed to have,  and remained with his brother Joseph during the spring. Samuel Smith had not  taken to the Prophet’s story as readily as other members of the family, and was  rather hard to convince that Joseph and Oliver had been ordained and baptized.  After much inquiry and explanation by Joseph and Oliver, Samuel retired alone to  the woods, and in secret prayer obtained a revelation for himself. Now  convinced, he was anxious to be baptized and to engage in the work of  establishing “the cause of Zion.”

 

Notes

 

1.  History of the Prophet Joseph, p. 106, Lucy Smith.

 

 2. Isaiah’s prophecy is as follows: “And the vision of all is become unto you as  the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned,  saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed: And  the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray  thee: and he saith, I am not learned. Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this  people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honor me, but have  removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the  precept of men: Therefore behold, I will proceed to do a marvelous work among  this people, even a marvelous work and a wonder; for the wisdom of their wise  men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid”  (Isa. 29:11 through 14).

 

For a discussion of this point see the History of the Mormon Church, by B. H.  Roberts, chapter 8. Also Orson Pratt’s Works, Chapter 6, and the Book of Mormon,  2 Nephi, 27th chapter.

 

Chapter 10 The Witnesses of the Book of Mormon. 1829 through 1830

 

The Witnesses Called

 

In due time, in June 1829, the Book of Mormon translation was finished. Three  special witnesses must now be chosen who should behold the plates through divine  favor and bear record to the world. This was according to the predictions of the  ancient prophets who had kept the records of the Nephites. Nephi, son of Lehi,  had prophesied: “Wherefore at that day when the book shall be delivered unto the  man of whom I have spoken, the book shall be hid from the eyes of the world,  that the eyes of none shall behold it save it be that three witnesses shall  behold it, by the power of God, besides him to whom the book shall be  delivered; and they shall testify to the truth of the book and the things  therein. And there is none other which shall view it, save it be a few  according to the will of God, to bear testimony of his word unto the children  of men; for the Lord God hath said that the words of the faithful should speak  as if it were from the dead.”1

 

In a revelation given at the request of Martin Harris, after his repentance, in  March, 1829 (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 5), this statement is reiterated, and Martin was  told he might be granted this great privilege of being one of the witnesses, if  he would humble himself sufficiently and overcome his pride in mighty prayer and  sincerity of heart, and acknowledge the things he had done which were wrong. It  was natural for Oliver Cowdery, the Prophet’s scribe, and David Whitmer, to  desire to be the two other witnesses of the special three.

 

When the translation was finished Joseph wrote to his parents requesting them to  come to him. This information they conveyed to Martin Harris at Palmyra, who  desired to accompany them. The next day after the word was received they started  on the journey. The evening of their arrival at the Whitmer home was spent in  reading the manuscript of the Book of Mormon, which caused them all to rejoice  exceedingly. They had not previously realized the magnitude of the work of  translation, nor had they received a clear understanding of what the book  contained.

 

When the time arrived for the manifestation of the power of the Lord to the  witnesses, as was the custom, early in the morning the little group at the  Whitmer home engaged in singing and prayer. At the close of these services  Joseph Smith arose and approaching Martin Harris said: “Martin Harris, you have  got to humble yourself before God this day, that you may obtain a forgiveness of  your sins. If you do, it is the will of God that you should look upon the  plates, in company with Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer.” Lucy Smith, the  Prophet’s mother, who was present, says this was spoken, “with a solemnity that  thrills through and through my veins to this day, when it occurs to my  recollection.”

 

These three men earnestly sought for the privilege of being the special  witnesses, Joseph laid the matter before the Lord and received a revelation by  Urim and Thummim granting their petition. The revelation is as follows:

 

Revelation to the Witnesses

 

 “Behold, I say unto you, that you must rely upon my word, which if you do with  full purpose of heart, you shall have a view of the plates, and also of the  breastplate, the sword of Laban, the Urim and Thummim, which were given to the  brother of Jared upon the mount, when he talked with the Lord face to face, and  the miraculous directors which were given to Lehi while in the wilderness, on  the borders of the Red Sea.

 

“And it is by your faith that you shall obtain a view of them, even by that  faith which was had by the prophets of old.

 

“And after that you have obtained faith, and have seen them with your eyes, you  shall testify of them, by the power of God;

 

“And this you shall do that my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., may not be destroyed,  that I may bring about my righteous purposes unto the children of men in this  work.

 

“And ye shall testify that you have seen them, even as my servant Joseph Smith,  Jun., has seen them, for it is by my power that he has seen them, and it is  because he had faith.

 

“And he has translated the book, even that part which I have commanded him, and  as your Lord and your God liveth it is true.

 

“Wherefore, you have received the same power, and the same faith, and the same  gift like unto him;

 

“And if you do these last commandments of mine, which I have given you, the  gates of hell shall not prevail against you; for my grace is sufficient for you,  and you shall be lifted up at the last day.

 

“And I, Jesus Christ, your Lord and your God, have spoken it unto you, that I  might bring about my righteous purposes unto the children of men. Amen” (Doc.  and Cov. Sec. 17).

 

The Witnesses Behold the Plates

 

A short time after this revelation was given these four, Joseph Smith, Oliver  Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, retired to the woods and engaged in  humble prayer. They asked the Lord to bestow upon them the blessing of the  promise. Each prayed in turn, according to previous agreement. Joseph prayed  first and after each had prayed and no answer of divine favor was obtained, they  again observed the same order of prayer, but without result. Feeling it was  because of his transgressions that no answer was received, Martin Harris  suggested that he would withdraw from the others. After consultation this was  agreed to, and Martin withdrew. Again the three knelt in prayer. Presently they  beheld above them a light of great brilliancy, and an angel descended and stood  before them. In his hand he held the plates, and before them were the other  records and sacred things spoken of in the revelation. The angel took the golden  book and turning leaf by leaf exhibited to the witnesses the engravings thereon.  He then turned to David Whitmer and said, “David, blessed is the Lord, and he  that keeps his commandments.” Immediately after this they heard a voice in the  bright light which shone above them, saying: “These plates have been revealed by  the power of God, and they have been translated by the power of God. The  translation of them which you have seen is correct, and I command you to bear  record of what you now see and hear.”

 

Joseph Smith now left Oliver and David and went in search of Martin Harris. He  found him at a considerable distance fervently petitioning the Lord in prayer.  With earnestness he pleaded with Joseph to join him that he too might be blessed  with a vision of the plates. Joseph readily consented, and before they had  prayed very long the same vision burst upon their presence and they beheld the  same messenger. The angel again turned the leaves one by one and the same scene  was re-enacted. Martin Harris was overjoyed and cried out: “’Tis enough; ’tis  enough; mine eyes have beheld; mine eyes have beheld!” Jumping up he shouted  hosannah and praised the Lord.

 

When they returned from this interview it was between three and four o’clock in  the afternoon. The incident is related by the Prophet’s mother in the following  words:

 

 “On coming in, Joseph threw himself down beside me, and exclaimed, ‘Father,  mother, you do not know how happy I am: the Lord has now caused the plates to be  shown to three more besides myself. They have seen an angel, who has testified  to them, and they will have to bear witness to the truth of what I have said,  for now they know for themselves, that I do not go about to deceive the people,  and I feel as if I was relieved of a burden which was almost too heavy for me to  bear; and it rejoices my soul, that I am not any longer to be entirely alone in  the world. Upon this, Martin Harris came in; he seemed almost overcome with joy,  and testified boldly to what he had both seen and heard. And so did David and  Oliver, adding, that no tongue could express the joy of their hearts, and the  greatness of the things which they had both seen and heard.”2

 

Testimony of the Three Witnesses

 

In accord with the instructions they received in the revelation and by direct  command from the voice of the Lord when they viewed the plates, the three  witnesses gave to the world their united testimony in writing. This testimony,  together with the testimony of eight other witnesses who also beheld the plates,  has been published in every copy of the Book of Mormon as a witness to the  unbelieving world. Their testimony is as follows:

 

 “Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, unto whom this  work shall come: That we, through the grace of God the Father, and our Lord  Jesus Christ, have seen the plates which contain this record, which is the  record of the people of Nephi, and also of the Lamanites, their brethren, and  also of the people of Jared, who came from the tower of which hath been spoken.  And we also know that they have been translated by the gift and power of God,  for his voice hath declared it unto us; wherefore we know of a surety that the  work is true. And we also testify that we have seen the engravings which are  upon the plates; and they have been shown unto us by the power of God, and not  of man. And we declare with words of soberness, that an angel of God came down  from heaven, and he brought and laid before our eyes, that we beheld and saw the  plates, and the engravings thereon; and we know that it is by the grace of God  the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, that we beheld and bear record that these  things are true. And it is marvelous in our eyes. Nevertheless, the voice of the  Lord commanded us that we should bear record of it; wherefore, to be obedient  unto the commandments of God, we bear testimony of these things. And we know  that if we are faithful in Christ, we shall rid our garments of the blood of all  men, and be found spotless before the judgment seat of Christ, and shall dwell  with him eternally in the heavens. And the honor be to the Father, and to the  Son, and to the Holy Ghost, which is one God. Amen.

 

Oliver Cowdery,  David Whitmer,  Martin Harris.”

 

Testimony of the Eight Witnesses

 

In addition to the testimony of the three witnesses, eight other witnesses were  called to view the plates and to give testimony to the world, and became the  “few according to the will of God, to bear testimony of his word unto the  children of men.” These eight men did not obtain the same privilege as the three  special witnesses, for it was not in the presence of an angel that they beheld  the record, but they were shown the plates by Joseph Smith by command of the  Lord. Their testimony is as follows:

 

 “Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, unto whom this  work shall come: That Joseph Smith, Jun., the translator of this work, has shown  unto us the plates of which hath been spoken, which have the appearance of gold;  and as many of the leaves as the said Smith has translated we did handle with  our hands; and we also saw the engravings thereon, all of which has the  appearance of ancient work, and of curious workmanship. And this we bear record  with words of soberness, that the said Smith has shown unto us, for we have seen  and hefted, and know of a surety that the said Smith has got the plates of which  we have spoken. And we give our names unto the world, to witness unto the world  that which we have seen. And we lie not, God bearing witness of it.

 

Christian Whitmer,  Jacob Whitmer,  Peter Whitmer, Jun.,  John Whitmer,  Hiram Page,  Joseph Smith, Sen.,  Hyrum Smith,  Samuel H. Smith.”

 

Necessity of the Testimonies

 

In all ages of the world when the Lord has had a work to be performed he has  raised up witnesses. In this manner his works are attested so that those who  reject them will be left without an excuse. The justice of the Lord demands that  this shall be done. The Lord commanded Moses, when in the wilderness, that no  man should be condemned except it be on the testimony of two or three witnesses.  “One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin,  in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of  three witnesses, shall the matter be established” (Deut. 19:15). The Savior  himself bore witness to the justice and validity of this law when he contended  with the Jews. Said He: “It is also written in your law, that the testimony of  two men is true. I am one that beareth witness of myself, and the Father that  sent me beareth witness of me.” In this manner he condemned them for rejecting  his testimony, which was attested by the scriptures and had the approval of his  Father.

 

If Joseph Smith had given no other testimony but his own, then he might justly  have been condemned, for his testimony would not have been in keeping with the  word of the Lord, but the testimony of three other men should be sufficient.  Reinforced as that testimony is by the testimony of the eleven others, and by  the witness which the book itself affords, the testimony given by Joseph Smith  becomes binding on the world. All who reject it, the Lord said, shall be  condemned, for the “testimony of two men is true,” provide they are truthful  witnesses. The Book of Mormon declares that in “the mouth of three witnesses  shall these things be established; and the testimony of three, and this work, in  the which shall be shown forth the power of God and also his word, of which the  Father and the Son, and the Holy Ghost bear record and all this shall stand as  a testimony against the world at the last day” (Ether 5:4).

 

Validity of the Testimonies

 

The witnesses of the Book of Mormon were true and faithful to their testimony  throughout their lives. The time came, however, when all three of the special  witnesses became estranged from Joseph Smith and departed from the Church.  Because of their spirit of rebellion against the Prophet and the work, Oliver  Cowdery and David Whitmer were dealt with for their fellowship and  excommunicated from the Church. Martin Harris simply drifted away without action  being taken against him in an official way. While the Prophet lived, they  retained their bitterness of spirit and remained aloof, but during all those  years, and to the end of life, all three were steadfast in their testimony as  found in the Book of Mormon. In the year 1848, after the Church had been driven  from Nauvoo, Oliver Cowdery returned to the Church, at Kanesville and humbly  begged to be re-admitted as a member. Martin Harris also sought again a place  and standing in the Church and in the year 1870 he came to Utah to make his  home. He died in 1875, at Clarkston, Utah, at the age of 92 years. David Whitmer  never came back to the Church, but shortly before his death, in refutation of  the statements that had gone forth that he had denied his testimony, he  published it again to the world, in which he said: “It is recorded in the  American Cyclopedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica, that I, David Whitmer, have  denied my testimony as one of the Three Witnesses to the divinity of the Book of  Mormon; and that the other two witnesses, Oliver Cowdery and Martin Harris,  denied their testimony to that book. I will say once more to all mankind, that I  have never at any time denied that testimony or any part thereof. I also testify  to the world, that neither Oliver Cowdery nor Martin Harris ever at any time  denied their testimony. They both died reaffirming the truth of the divine  authenticity of the Book of Mormon.”3

 

Impossibility of Collusion

 

If there had been collusion between Joseph Smith and the witnesses, then of  necessity they would have had to hold together and tell the same story. A  disagreement on the part of any, or all of them, would have meant destruction to  their plan, if it were not true. The boldness with which Joseph Smith and the  Church met the situation, when these men rebelled, and took action against them  and severed them from the Church, would never have been done if there had been  fraud and collusion. The Prophet and the high council would not have dared to do  it. This fact together with the other fact that after they were severed from the  Church and had become estranged, they all three bore the same testimony, and all  told the same story which they told when in the Church, precludes even the  remotest possibility that they had planned together to deceive. These truths  together with much more evidence which cannot be mentioned here, is strong  presumptive evidence of the authenticity of the solemn message given by these  witnesses to the world.

 

The Angel Receives the Plates

 

After the completion of the translation of the Book of Mormon in 1829, the angel  again appeared to Joseph Smith and received back the plates into his keeping. Of  this circumstance the Prophet wrote in 1838: “By the wisdom of God, they [the  plates] remained safe in my hands, until I had accomplished by them what was  required at my hand. When, according to arrangement, the messenger called for  them, I delivered them up to him, and he has them in his charge until this day.”

 

The Book of Mormon Printed

 

The question of printing the manuscript now confronted Joseph Smith. Not only  was he without the necessary means, but printers were scarce and those who were  approached were either prejudiced through bigotry, or unwilling for fear of the  opposition of customers. Martin Harris, who possessed the means, came to the  rescue with a promise to pay for the printing of the book. Finally a contract  was entered into with Mr. Egbert B. Grandin, of Palmyra, who consented to print  five thousand copies of the Book of Mormon for three thousand dollars. In the  meantime the copyright to the book had been secured. The appearance of the words  “Author and Proprietor” which appear on the title page of the first edition of  the Book of Mormon, have caused some ridicule by enemies of Joseph Smith. This  expression was printed in the book in accord with the law governing copyrights,  and in no way detracts from the validity of the story of the translation of the  record.

 

Soon after the completion of the translation and the securing of the copyright,  the Lord commanded that Oliver Cowdery should transcribe the entire manuscript,  and that in furnishing copy to the printer, the second copy should be used, and  that only sheet by sheet, as the type should be set up. It was further provided  that in going to and from the printing office, there should always be a guard to  protect the manuscript, and that a guard should be placed at the home constantly  to watch and protect the translation from evil disposed persons. These  precautions were necessary because of the malicious opposition which prevailed  in and about Palmyra, where the work was done. At times attempts were made to  get the manuscript from the possession of Joseph and those who, with him, had  the work in charge.

 

One man, named Cole, more cunning than the others who opposed the work, devised  the plan of anticipating the publication of the book. Cole, an ex-justice of the  peace, was printing a paper which he called Dogberry Paper on Winter Hill. He  had announced to his subscribers that he would furnish them weekly installments  of the Book of Mormon in his paper. Having access to the Grandin printing  office, he commenced his publication by working on Sundays when the office was  closed. In this manner he was able to publish a number of issues containing  garbled extracts from the printed sheets of the Book of Mormon. As the copyright  was secured, he was warned and finally stopped from this method of stealing. The  work of printing the book continued, but not without interruption, for great  pressure was brought to bear upon the printer who was threatened by enemies of  the latter-day work, with a withdrawal of trade that would ruin his business.  This came near to breaking the contract. However, after some delays, the book  was finished some time in the spring of 1830, and made ready to go forth, as the  Nephite prophets had foretold, to the Gentiles and then to the house of Israel  as a voice speaking out of the dust.

 

Notes

 

1.  2 Nephi 27:12 through 13. Ether 5:2 through 4. Compare John 8:16 through 18.

 

2.  History of the Prophet Joseph, p. 139. Lucy Smith

 

3.  An Address to All Believers in Christ, David Whitmer. Compare Millennial  Star, 43:301.

 

Chapter 11 Revelation on Doctrine and Church Government. 1829 through 1830

 

Revelation to the Witnesses

 

Before the Church could be organized it was essential that there be revealed  such matters as pertained to the organization of the Church. This was done  between the time the witnesses viewed the plates of the ancient record and the  sixth of April, 1830. The first of these (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 18) was given to  Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer, at Fayette. It made known the  calling of the Twelve Apostles who should be chosen in this dispensation,  although it was about six years before they were called. It gave instructions  “relative to the building up of the Church of Christ according to the fulness of  the Gospel.” It was also stated that the Book of Mormon contained “all things  written concerning the foundation” of the Church and the Gospel. The Church,  when organized, should be built upon the foundation of the Gospel and “the gates  of hell shall not prevail” against it. Moreover, it was declared that “the world  is ripening in iniquity, and it must needs be that the children of men are  stirred up unto repentance, both the Gentiles and also the house of Israel.” To  Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer, the Lord said that all men were now called on  to repent, for the Priesthood was restored and the opportunity given for the  remission of sins. These men had been called as special witnesses, and therefore  were under obligation to warn the world. Until this time men had not been  privileged to be baptized, for there had been no authority in the earth to  officiate in gospel ordinances. The Lord said the worth of souls was great, for  Christ had suffered “the pains of all men that all might repent and come unto  him.” As many as would repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ and  endure to the end, should be saved. It was made clear in this revelation that  all men must take upon them the name of Jesus Christ, for in his name should  “they be called in the last day.” Otherwise they “cannot have a place in the  kingdom” of the Father.

 

The Twelve Apostles

 

Not only were Joseph Smith and the witnesses to the Book of Mormon to be called  to testify, but there were to be twelve other witnesses, who should be appointed  to declare the Gospel to both Gentile and Jew. The three witnesses to the Book  of Mormon were designated to search out these Twelve Apostles, who were to have  charge of the preaching of the Gospel in all the world.

 

Revelation Given to Martin Harris

 

The next great commandment (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 19) was given to Martin Harris,  in March, 1830, as one of the three special witnesses. Martin was admonished and  warned against his weaknesses, and was commanded to preach the first principles  of the Gospel and declare “glad tidings” upon the mountains, and “every high  place, and among the people,” unto the end of his life. If he should fail, then  misery should he receive. He was further instructed to keep his contract with  the printer, and impart of his substance for the printing of the Book of Mormon,  which “contains the truth and the word of God.”

 

The Atonement and Eternal Punishment Explained

 

The most important teaching in this revelation was the doctrine of the atonement  and the explanation of the expression “eternal punishment.” “I am Alpha and  Omega,” said the Lord, “yea, even I am He, the beginning and the end, the  Redeemer of the world. I have accomplished and finished the will of him whose I  am, even the Father, concerning me  having done this that I might subdue all  things unto myself, retaining all power, even to the destroying of Satan and his  works at the end of the world, and the last great day of judgment, which I shall  pass upon the inhabitants thereof, judging every man according to his works and  the deeds which he hath done.

 

“And surely every man must repent or suffer, for I, God, am endless; wherefore,  I revoke not the judgments which I shall pass, but woes shall go forth, weeping,  wailing and gnashing of teeth, yea, to those who are found on my left hand.  Nevertheless it is not written that there shall be no end to this torment, but  it is written endless torment. Again it is written eternal damnation; wherefore  it is more express than other scriptures, that it might work upon the hearts of  the children of men, altogether for my name’s glory. Wherefore I will explain  unto you this mystery, for it is mete unto you to know even as mine apostles. .   . .

 

“For behold, the mystery of Godliness, how great is it? for, behold, I am  endless, and the punishment which is given from my hand, is endless punishment,  for Endless is my name; wherefore

 

Eternal punishment is God’s punishment.

 

Endless punishment is God’s punishment.”

 

Then follows the statement that Jesus Christ “suffered the pains for all, that  they might not suffer if they would repent.” These sufferings were most  exquisite and sore, which caused him “the greatest of all, to tremble because of  pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer both body and spirit;” and would  that he “might not drink the bitter cup and shrink.” Nevertheless he partook of  that cup and finished his work, and this that men might not suffer if they would  repent; but if they will not repent then they must suffer even as he.

 

Revelation on Church Government

 

In April 1830, just before the organization of the Church, another very  important revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 20) was received on Church government.  In it the date for the organization of the Church was designated as April 6. The  Church was to be “regularly organized and established agreeable to the laws of  our country” by the will and commandment of the Lord. These commandments were  given to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, who had been called and ordained to be  apostles, or special witnesses for Christ. Joseph Smith was to be the first  elder of the Church and Oliver Cowdery the second elder, and they were to ordain  each other to these callings, according to the grace of Jesus Christ. Other  matters of great importance revealed are as follows:

 

Mention is made of the matter of translation of the Book of Mormon, which is  said to contain the record of a fallen people, and the fulness of the Gospel to  the Gentiles and also to the Jews. By the opening of the heavens, and the  inspiration given to men who are called to his holy work, the Lord has shown  that “he is the same God yesterday, today, and forever, and does inspire men and  call them to his work in this age and generation, as well as in generations of  old.

 

By these great witnesses the world shall be judged, “even as many as shall come  to a knowledge of this work.” Those who receive it in righteousness shall  receive a crown of eternal life, while those who reject it shall be condemned.  It is declared that the Lord has spoken, and the elders of the Church have heard  and bear witness so that through their testimony man may know there is a God in  heaven, who is infinite and eternal, from everlasting to everlasting, the same  unchangeable Framer of heaven and earth and all things which are in them. Man  is created in the image of God, male and female, and is commanded to love and  serve him. Through transgression of his laws, man became fallen, wherefore the  Only Begotten Son was sent into the world to suffer temptations but gave no heed  to them was crucified, died, and rose the third day and ascended into heaven to  reign in power. All who believe on him and are baptized and endure to the end,  shall be saved, no matter when they lived on the earth. Men everywhere must  repent and believe in Christ, worshiping the Father in the name of the Son and  endure in faith, or they cannot be saved. Justification through grace is true,  as also is sanctification, to all who love the Father with all their might, mind  and strength. The dangers of falling away from grace are pointed out, with a  warning to the members of the Church to “take heed and pray always lest they  fall into temptation.”

 

Manner of Baptism Explained

 

By way of commandment to the Church the manner of Baptism is set forth as  follows: “All those who humble themselves before God, and desire to be baptized  and come forth with broken hearts and contrite spirits, and witness before the  Church that they have truly repented of all their sins, and are willing to take  upon them the name of Jesus Christ, having a determination to serve him to the  end, and truly manifest by their works that they have received of the Spirit of  Christ unto the remission of their sins, shall be received into his Church.” No  person can be received into the Church unless he has arrived unto the years of  accountability, which is eight years, for he must be capable of repentance,  which infants are not. Baptism is to be administered in the following manner  unto all who repent:

 

How Baptism is Performed

 

“The person who is called of God, and has authority from Jesus Christ to  baptize, shall go down into the water with the person who has presented him or  herself for baptism, and shall say, calling him or her by name: Having been  commissioned of Jesus Christ, I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of  the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen. Then shall he immerse him or her in the  water, and come forth again out of the water.”

 

Duties of Elders, Priests, Teachers, Deacons and Members

 

An apostle is said to be an elder. His calling is to baptize and ordain other  officers in the Church. It should here be explained that at the organization of  the Church and for some time thereafter, the officers mentioned here were all  that were needed. As the Church expanded the Lord revealed the duties of other  officers in their time. Elders are to baptize, confirm members, preach, expound  the scriptures, administer the sacrament and take charge of meetings which are  to be conducted “as they,” the elders “are led by the Holy Ghost, according to  the commandments and revelations.”

 

The priest is to teach, expound, baptize and administer the sacrament. He may  ordain other priests, teachers and deacons, but cannot lay on hands for the gift  of the Holy Ghost. He may take the lead of meetings in the absence of higher  authority. It is his duty to visit the home of the members and exhort them to  pray vocally and in secret and to attend to all family duties. When called upon  he is to assist the elder in his duties.

 

The teacher is to be the guardian of the Church. He is to see that there is no  iniquity in the Church, neither lying, backbiting, or evil speaking among the  members, and to see that the Church meet together often and that the members  perform their duties. He is to take the lead of meetings if there is no elder or  priest present and may assist them in their duties. He cannot baptize, confirm,  or administer the sacrament.

 

The deacon is to assist the teacher and other officers in the Church, but he  cannot baptize, confirm, or administer the sacrament.

 

Conferences of the Church

 

The elders of the Church are instructed to meet in conference once in three  months, or from time to time as they may determine, to transact such business as  may come before them. All who are ordained are to receive certificates of  ordination, and shall be accepted as officers in the Church by the vote of the  members.

 

Duties of Church Members

 

All members shall be received by baptism after they have repented of their sins.  They shall have sufficient time to be taught the Gospel and Church government  before they are confirmed and partake of the sacrament. Children are to be  brought to the elders of the Church, who shall bless them. The members must meet  together often to partake of the sacrament in remembrance of the Lord Jesus  Christ. The elder or priest who shall administer the sacrament “shall kneel with  the Church and call upon the Father in solemn prayer,” repeating the words which  the Lord Himself has given.

 

Transgressors

 

Any member of the Church transgressing the commandments of the Lord, or the  rules of the Church, shall be dealt with as the scriptures direct. If any are  expelled their names are to be “blotted out” and not kept on the records of the  Church.

 

Recommendations of Members

 

Records of members are to be kept in a book, and the members moving from one  branch to another shall take a letter of recommendation, or certificate, stating  that they are in standing in the Church. This shall be presented to the  presiding officer in the branch with which they desire to unite.

 

Summary

 

These commandments and instructions were given through Joseph Smith, shortly  before the organization of the Church, to guide him and his companions in Church  government. They are all important because they deal with the fundamental  principles of the Gospel and doctrines of the Church. They set forth clearly  many things which were familiarly known in the primitive Church, but which were  either lost or perverted during the ages of apostasy and departure from the  standards set by the Savior and his disciples. Again they are restored in their  simplicity, freed from all mysticism and error, for the salvation of mankind.

 

Chapter 12 Organization of the Church. 1830

 

The Church Organized

 

It was made known, shortly after the bestowal of the Melchizedek Priesthood,  that the Church of Jesus Christ was to be organized. It was after Joseph Smith  and his companions had engaged in solemn prayer that the word of the Lord came  to them in the home of Father Peter Whitmer, “commanding us,” the Prophet  writes, “that I should ordain Oliver Cowdery to be an elder in the Church of  Jesus Christ; and that he also should ordain me to the same office; and then to  ordain others, as it should be made known unto us from time to time. We were,  however, commanded to defer this our ordination until such times as it should be  practicable to have our brethren, who had been and who should be baptized,  assembled together, when we must have their sanction to our thus proceeding to  ordain each other, and have them decide by vote whether they were willing to  accept us as spiritual teachers or not; when also we were commanded to bless  bread and break it with them, and to take wine, bless it, and drink it with  them; afterward proceed to ordain each other according to commandment; then call  out such men as the Spirit should indicate, and ordain them; and then attend to  the laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost, upon all those whom we  had previously baptized, doing all things in the name of the Lord.”

 

Fulfilment of the Promise

 

On the sixth day of April, 1830, the time for the fulfilment of this promise  arrived, Joseph and a few of those who had been baptized met in the house of  Peter Whitmer, Sen., and proceeded, as the Lord had instructed them, to organize  the Church. It was on a Tuesday, and there were six in number, namely, Joseph  Smith, Oliver Cowdery, Hyrum Smith, Peter Whitmer, Jr., David Whitmer and Samuel  H. Smith. The small, but momentous meeting, was opened by solemn prayer. Those  present then proceeded to express their willingness, as instructed by divine  commandment, to accept Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery as their teachers in the  things of the kingdom of God. Then they were called upon to declare whether or  not they were willing to proceed to organize the Church of Jesus Christ. To both  propositions they consented with unanimous voice. “I then laid my hands upon  Oliver Cowdery,” says the Prophet, “and ordained him an elder of the Church of  Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; after which he ordained me also to the office  of elder of said Church. We then took bread, blessed it, and brake it with them;  and also wine, blessed, and drank it with them. We then laid our hands on each  individual member of the Church present, that they might receive the gift of the  Holy Ghost, and be confirmed members of the Church of Christ. The Holy Ghost was  poured out upon us to a very marked degree, some prophesied, whilst we all  praised the Lord, and rejoiced exceedingly.”

 

All six of these young men Hyrum Smith, the oldest, was but 31 years of age had  been baptized previously to the organization. They were all again baptized on  that memorable day, April 6, 1830.

 

A Record to be Kept

 

While they were still in session in this meeting of organization a revelation  (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 21) was given to the Church in which they were instructed to  keep a record. In this record, Joseph Smith was to be called “a seer, a  translator, a prophet, an apostle of Jesus Christ, and elder of the Church  through the will of God the Father, and the grace of your Lord Jesus Christ.”  The Church was also commanded to give heed unto all his words and commandments,  “as he receiveth them, as if from mine own mouth, in all patience and faith,”  said the Lord. By doing this “the gates of hell” should not prevail against  them, for the Lord would dispel the powers of darkness. The Prophet would no  longer have to mourn for Zion, for he should have inspiration to move the cause  of Zion in mighty power, for the days of her rejoicing were at hand. Oliver  Cowdery was appointed “the first preacher of the Church, unto the Church, and  before the world, yea, before the Gentiles and . . . to the Jews also.”

 

Destiny of the Church

 

In the manner here described, there came into the world a power, destined to  grow and expand until it shall fill the earth, for it is the “kingdom which  shall never be destroyed . . . and it shall stand forever.” At the time of the  organization, however, its influence and power appeared to be insignificant; yet  it caused, even then, consternation and fear in the hearts of the wicked, and  strenuous efforts were launched to bring it to destruction.

 

Others Called to the Ministry

 

Before the meeting closed Joseph and Oliver called out others and ordained them  to different offices in the Priesthood, as the Spirit manifested unto them,  presumably to the offices in the Aaronic Priesthood. The Spirit of the Lord was  poured out upon them in abundance, and after a happy time spent in testimony and  witnessing to each other the blessings of the Lord, they dismissed the meeting,  feeling that they were now individually members of the Church of Jesus Christ,  and acknowledged as such of God. There were others present besides the six who  formed the organization of the Church. Six persons were required by law to  properly form a society or organization of the kind. Others who were present  also received of the Spirit of the Lord in the meeting and being convinced of  the truth came forward and desired to be united with the Church. Shortly  afterwards they were also baptized. Among these were the Prophet’s parents,  Joseph Smith, Sen., and Lucy Mack Smith; also Martin Harris and Orrin Porter  Rockwell.

 

Baptism a New and Everlasting Covenant

 

As stated, all six of the original members of the Church were again baptized on  the day of the organization. This action was due, in part at least, to the fact  that baptism is the doorway into the Church as well as for the remission of  sins. There had been a few others baptized before the sixth of April (see Ch.  9). Some of those previously baptized raised the question as to why they should  again be baptized. In consequence of their desire to unite with the Church  without re-baptism, the Prophet inquired of the Lord in relation to the matter  and received the following revelation:

 

 “Behold, I say unto you, that all old covenants have I caused to be done away in  this thing, and this is a new and an everlasting covenant, even that which was  from the beginning.

 

Wherefore, although a man should be baptized an hundred times, it availeth him  nothing, for you cannot enter in at the strait gate by the law of Moses, neither  by your dead works;

 

For it is because of your dead works, that I have caused this last covenant and  this Church to be built up unto me, even as in days of old.

 

Wherefore, enter ye in at the gate, as I have commanded, and seek not to counsel  your God. Amen” (Doc. and Cov. sec. 22).

 

Chapter 13 Beginning of the Public Ministry of the Church. 1830

 

The First Public Discourse

 

On Sunday, April 11, 1830, the work of proselyting was publicly launched. The  first discourse was preached by Oliver Cowdery. The meeting was held by  appointment at the home of “Father” Peter Whitmer, where the meeting of  organization had been held the Tuesday preceding. A goodly number of members and  investigators were present. The impression made on the minds of those assembled  was favorable, and the same day Hiram Page, Katherine Page, Christian Whitmer,  Anne Whitmer, Jacob Whitmer and Elizabeth Whitmer, were baptized. One week later  (April 18) Peter Whitmer, Sen., Mary Whitmer, William Jolly, Elizabeth Jolly,  Vincent Jolly, Richard B. Preston and Elizabeth Ann Whitmer, were added to the  Church.

 

The Ministry of Joseph Smith in Colesville

 

Later in the month of April Joseph Smith paid a visit to the Knight family in  Colesville, Broome County, N. Y. He had been on very friendly terms with Joseph  Knight, Sen., and had been materially assisted by that gentleman from time to  time, while translating the plates. Mr. Knight and his family were  Universalists, with broad, liberal views. They were willing to reason in a  friendly spirit with Joseph Smith on the scriptures. Several public meetings  were held in Colesville which were attended by many friends and strangers. Newel  Knight, son of Joseph Knight, Sen., was a regular attendant at these meetings,  and seemed to be deeply impressed. He and the Prophet held many conversations on  scriptural subjects and the plan of salvation, in which a favorable impression  was made on the mind of Newel. He promised to assist Joseph in one of these  meetings by offering vocal prayer, but when the time came his courage failed  him. Later he expressed a desire to go out in the woods by himself and there,  where he could be alone, offer vocal prayer, a thing to which he evidently was  not accustomed. The following morning, in fulfilment of his promise, he retired  into the woods alone, with a troubled conscience because of his failure to keep  his promise on the previous occasion. Kneeling in a secluded spot he attempted  to offer vocal prayer, but his lips were sealed. He could not pray. He began to  feel uneasy and became troubled in both mind and body. When he arrived home his  wife was greatly alarmed at his strange appearance. He requested her to send for  Joseph, which was done. When he came he found Newel suffering very much; his  visage was distorted, and his limbs were twisted out of shape in a frightful  manner. Presently he was caught up from the floor and tossed about the room. The  strange scene and excitement brought many of the neighbors to the house, who  witnessed his peculiar malady.

 

The First Miracle

 

After some difficulty Joseph succeeded in taking Newel by the hand, and with  great earnestness Newel pleaded with him to cast the devil out of him, for he  knew he was possessed. The Prophet said, “If you know that I can, it shall be  done.” Then, almost unconsciously, he rebuked the evil spirit in the name of  Jesus Christ and commanded him to depart. Immediately Newel spoke, saying he saw  the evil spirit leave him and vanish from his sight. This was the first miracle  performed in this dispensation. As soon as the devil departed Newel became  normal again, his distortions of body ceased, and the Spirit of the Lord opened  his vision to a glorious manifestation of the heavens.

 

Those who were present were greatly astonished when they saw the casting out of  the devil, and the witness of the Spirit of the Lord. Nearly all of those who  were present later became members of the Church.

 

The First Conference of the Church

 

Shortly after this event, Joseph returned to Fayette. Newel Knight followed him  and was baptized during the last week in May, by David Whitmer. On the 9th of  June the first conference of the Church was held in Fayette. The Church at that  time numbered twenty-seven souls. There were many others present at the  meetings, some of whom were friendly and some who believed. At this conference  the sacrament was administered and those recently baptized were confirmed.  Others were sustained by the members to receive the Priesthood, and were  ordained. The officers at the commencement of the Conference were, Joseph Smith,  Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer, Peter Whitmer and Ziba Peterson, each of whom  held the office of elder in the Church. During this conference Samuel H. Smith  was ordained to the office of an elder, Joseph Smith, Sen., Hyrum Smith and  Martin Harris were ordained priests, and Hiram Page and Christian Whitmer were  ordained teachers. At the close of this conference there were in the Church  seven ordained elders, three priests and two teachers. Oliver Cowdery was  appointed to keep the record of the Church and minutes of meetings until the  next conference. The Holy Spirit was poured out upon them. Many of this little  band composing the Church were given the spirit of prophecy, while others beheld  visions and remarkable manifestations from the heavens. Newel Knight saw in  vision the great work which would yet be accomplished through the preaching of  the Gospel and the organization of the Church. He beheld the Redeemer and  received the assurance that he would be admitted into his presence to dwell in  his kingdom for ever.

 

“To find ourselves engaged in the very same order of things,” said Joseph Smith,  “as observed by the holy apostles of old; to realize the importance and  solemnity of such proceedings; and to witness and feel with our own natural  senses, the like glorious manifestations of the powers of the Priesthood, the  gift and blessing of the Holy Ghost, and the goodness and condescension of a  merciful God unto such as obey the everlasting Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ,  combined to create within us sensations of rapturous gratitude, and inspire us  with fresh zeal and energy in the cause of truth.”

 

Eleven other converts were baptized at the close of this conference, by David  Whitmer, in Seneca Lake, where most of the other baptisms were performed. Those  added to the Church at this time were: John Poorman, John Jolly, Julia Ann  Jolly, Harriet Jolly, Jerusha Smith (the wife of Hyrum Smith), William,  Catherine and Don Carlos Smith; and Peter, Caroline and Electa Rockwell.

 

Second Visit to Colesville

 

Joseph Smith again paid a visit to Colesville a short time after this  conference. Oliver Cowdery, John and David Whitmer accompanied him. They found a  number of persons anxiously awaiting them and desiring baptism. A meeting was  appointed for the Sabbath; on Saturday a dam was constructed across a stream in  preparation for the ordinance on the following day. During the night the dam was  maliciously destroyed. It was later learned that this was the work of a mob, at  the instigation of sectarian priests. On Sunday the meeting was held as  contemplated. Oliver Cowdery was the principal speaker, but others also spoke.  The first principles of the Gospel were presented and witness to the divine  message of the Book of Mormon was borne. In the meeting were many who had helped  to form the mob, who, at the close, endeavored to destroy the influence of the  meeting, but were unsuccessful. Extreme bitterness was manifested on the part of  those who opposed. The sister of Newel Knight’s wife was violently treated  because she was kindly disposed, and against her will was forced by a Rev.  Shearer, to return to her father’s home, some distance from her sister’s, where  she was stopping. This man, a Presbyterian minister, on false pretenses,  obtained from the father a power of attorney, by which he dragged her off. His  labor was all in vain, for she also was baptized.

 

Early Monday morning the dam was replaced and thirteen persons were baptized by  Oliver Cowdery. They were: Emma, wife of Joseph Smith; Hezekiah Peck and wife,  Joseph Knight, Sen., and wife, William Stringham and wife, Joseph Knight, Jr.,  Aaron Culver and wife, Levi Hale, Polly Knight and Julia Stringham.

 

Arrest of Joseph Smith

 

Before they were through with the ordinance the mob began to gather. They  surrounded the house of Joseph Knight, Sen., prepared to do violence, but  through the blessings of the Lord the Saints were protected, but were subjected  to numerous insults and threatenings. A meeting was called for that evening for  the purpose of attending to the confirmation of those baptized in the morning.  When they met at the appointed hour, they were all surprised at the appearance  of a constable, who, with a warrant, arrested Joseph on the charge of being “a  disorderly person, setting the country in an uproar by preaching the Book of  Mormon.” The constable frankly informed him that the arrest was for the purpose  of getting him into the hands of a mob, then lying in ambush for him, but he  would save him from their hands as he, the constable, had discovered that  Joseph was not the sort of person he had been led to believe. As Joseph  accompanied the constable in a wagon, they encountered the mob, not far from  the home of Joseph Knight. The mobbers waited for the prearranged signal from  the constable, but he, whipping up his horse, obtained a lead. The mobbers  followed as best they could. In the flight one of the wagon wheels came off, and  before it could be replaced the mobbers were again in sight. However, the wheel  was replaced in time and with renewed energy Joseph was able to escape.

 

The constable took Joseph to South Bainbridge, Chenango County, and lodged him  in a tavern, where he kept guard all night. The following day a court convened  to investigate the charges. Great excitement prevailed because of falsehoods  which had been circulated freely among the people. Joseph Knight, Sen., engaged  the services of two respectable farmers who were versed in the law, namely,  James Davidson and John Reid, and brought them to South Bainbridge to defend the  Prophet.

 

The Trial at South Bainbridge

 

The enemies of Joseph Smith scoured the country for witnesses who would testify  against him. The justice of the peace who heard the case, Joseph Chamberlain,  was a man of fair mind and a lover of justice. Many witnesses were heard, but  among those who testified were Josiah Stowel, Jonathan Thompson and the two  daughters of Mr. Stowel, all of whom gave evidence of his good character. Other  testimony was proved to be false. The trial lasted from ten o’clock in the  morning until midnight, when a verdict of “not guilty” was rendered.

 

The Second Arrest

 

No sooner was Joseph freed by the court than he was again arrested on a second  warrant from Broome County, a distance of about fifteen miles. The constable who  came for him forced him to leave that night without permitting him to eat,  although he had been in the court room all day without nourishment. He took him  to Colesville and lodged him in a tavern. Then, calling in a number of rowdies,  he began to abuse his prisoner with the assistance of his rabble. Spitting upon  him and pointing their fingers at him they cried in fiendish glee, “Prophesy,  prophesy!” Being near his home, Joseph requested the constable to take him there  for the remainder of the night, but this was denied him. He asked for something  to eat and was given some crusts of bread and water.

 

The Trial at Colesville

 

The next day the trial began before three justices. The most able help had been  secured to prosecute the case while the defense was again represented by  Esquires Reid and Davidson. Many witnesses were called who bore false and  contradictory testimony. Newel Knight was placed upon the stand and questioned  in ridicule by one of the lawyers, named Seymour, in relation to the casting out  of a devil from his person, but the testimony turned to the discomfiture of the  prosecution.

 

At the close of the testimony the court deliberated for about thirty minutes,  although it was then nearly two o’clock a.m. and they had been in session since  the morning of the previous day. The prisoner was brought before the court and  the presiding justice said: “Mr. Smith, we have had your case under  consideration, examined the testimony and find nothing to condemn you, and  therefore you are discharged.” The judges then proceeded to reprimand him  severely, “Not because anything derogatory to his character in any shape had  been proved against him by the host of witnesses that had testified during the  trial,” said Mr. Reid, “but merely to please those fiends in human shape who  were engaged in the unhallowed persecution of an innocent man, sheerly on  account of his religious opinions.”

 

Statement of Mr. Reid

 

Several years later, Mr. Reid visited Nauvoo, and in the course of an address  said, speaking of these trials:

 

 “But, alas! the devil, not satisfied with his defeat (at the first trial)  stirred up a man not unlike himself, who was more fit to dwell among the fiends  of hell than to belong to the human family, to go to Colesville and get another  writ, and take him to Broome County for another trial. They were sure they could  send that boy to hell, or to Texas, they did not care which; and in half an hour  after he was discharged by the court, he was arrested again, and on the way to  Colesville for another trial. I was again called upon by his friends to defend  him against his malignant persecutors, and clear him from the false charges they  had preferred against him. I made every reasonable excuse I could, as I was  nearly worn down through fatigue and want of sleep, as I had been engaged in law  suits for two days, and nearly the whole of two nights. But I saw the  persecution was great against him; and here, let me say, Mr, Chairman, singular  as it may seem, while Mr. Knight was pleading with me to go, a peculiar  impression, or thought struck my mind, that I must go and defend him, for he was  the Lord’s anointed. I did not know what it meant, but thought I must go and  clear the Lord’s anointed. I said I would go, and started with as much faith as  the apostles had when they could remove mountains, accompanied by Father Knight,  who was like the old patriarchs that followed the ark of God to the city of  David. . . . We got him away that night from the midst of three hundred people  without his receiving any injury; but I am well aware that we were assisted by  some higher power than man; for to look back on the scene, I cannot tell how we  succeeded in getting him away. I take no glory to myself; it was the Lord’s work  and marvelous in our eyes” (Times and Seasons 5:549 through 552).

 

Inspiration of the Attorneys

 

At the trial the Prophet’s lawyers, who were not members of the Church, spoke  with an inspiration that caused their enemies to quake before them. So powerful  were their words that many of the assembled multitude were pricked in their  hearts. The constable who had been so vicious came forward and apologized for  his ill-treatment and misbehavior, and revealed the plans of the mob who were  then prepared to tar and feather the Prophet and ride him on a rail. By the aid  of the constable, Joseph was able to escape and make his way in safety to his  sister’s home, where he found his wife awaiting him.

 

The Mob Threatens Joseph and Oliver

 

A few days later Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery returned to Colesville to  confirm those whom they had been forced to leave, at the time of Joseph’s  arrest. Their presence was the signal for the mobbers to again assemble. So  sinister were their movements that Joseph and Oliver departed from the town  without waiting for refreshments. Their enemies pursued them but through extreme  diligence they were able to make their escape. All night they traveled, except  for a short period when they sought some rest in sleep, each taking turn in  watching. The next day they arrived home, footsore and weary.

 

The spirit of opposition which took such decided form, was the result of  agitation on the part of professors of religion. The Rev. Shearer, Cyrus  McMaster, Dr. Boyington and a Mr. Benton, pillars in the Presbyterian Church,  incited the mobbers to do their work. Benton was the man who signed the first  warrant for Joseph Smith’s arrest as a “disorderly person” for preaching the  Book of Mormon. In this manner Satan stirred up the hearts of the people to try  and overthrow the work.

 

Missionary Journey of Samuel H. Smith

 

In the month of June, 1830, Samuel Harrison Smith was set apart by the Prophet  to take a missionary journey to the east. This may be termed the first  missionary journey in the Church. Taking with him several copies of the Book of  Mormon, he started on his way. The first day he traveled twenty-five miles, and  on the way attempted to sell copies of the book, but without success. When night  came on he went to an inn, faint and hungry; approaching the proprietor he asked  him if he did not want to buy a book which contained the history of the Indians.

 

“I do not know,” the man replied, “how did you get hold of it?”

 

“It was translated by my brother, from some plates of gold, that he found buried  in the earth,” was Samuel’s reply.

 

“You liar!” said the landlord, “get out of my house, you shan’t stay one minute  with your books.”

 

Samuel was discouraged, but continued on his journey. That night he slept under  an apple tree. In the morning he called at the home of Rev. John P. Greene, a  Methodist minister. Mr. Greene was just leaving on a preaching tour, and like  the others who had been approached, he was not interested in the book. However,  he manifested a friendly spirit, and at the earnest solicitation of Samuel,  consented to take a subscription paper and try to sell copies of the book.  Thereupon Samuel left him a copy of the Book of Mormon with the understanding  that he would call again in about two weeks. At the appointed time Samuel  returned and was disappointed to learn that there had been no sale. On his way  to the home of Mr. Greene, Samuel again passed the tavern. On the door was a  small-pox sign. Making inquiry he learned that the tavern keeper had died from  the effects of the disease. He returned home after his labors were finished,  feeling that his work had proved to be fruitless. More out of curiosity than  desire, both Mr. Greene and his wife read the book and were deeply impressed.  The copy Samuel left with John P. Greene was placed by the latter in the hands  of members of the Young family, which was the first direct information to  Brigham Young and his brothers and some of their friends, including Heber C.  Kimball, of the restoration of the Gospel.

 

Joseph Smith, Sen., Visits Potsdam

 

About this time Joseph Smith, Sen., and his youngest son, Don Carlos, departed  on a similar journey to Potsdam, N. Y. Potsdam was the home of Asael Smith,  father of Joseph Smith, Sen., and several of his children. Joseph was more  successful on this trip than his son Samuel apparently had been, for his father  Asael accepted the truth of the everlasting Gospel, as also did most of his  children. Jesse, the oldest son of Asael, rejected the message of his brother  Joseph and manifested a very bitter spirit against the Gospel all his life.

 

Book of Moses Revealed

 

During the summer of 1830, the Lord revealed to the Church a number of important  revelations. In June, the Prophet received the words of the Lord to Moses, at a  time when Moses was caught up into a high mountain where he talked with the Lord  face to face. This revelation was augmented later by more of the writings of  Moses, which are found in the Pearl of Great Price. Some of the important  knowledge imparted in this revelation is as follows: The works of the Lord are  without end. No man can behold all the works of the Father without partaking of  his glory, and that cannot be given in mortal life. Moses was created in the  similitude, or likeness, of the Only Begotten Son. The generations of men passed  before his view and he saw from the beginning to the end all through the  spiritual eye, for the natural eye cannot behold the glory of the Lord. After  this vision had passed, Moses was left unto himself and it was several hours  before he gained his natural strength. Then Satan came, tempting him and  commanding him to worship him, but Moses said: “Who art thou? For behold, I am a  son of God, in the similitude of his Only Begotten Son; and where is thy glory,  that I should worship thee? For behold, I could not look upon God, except his  glory should come upon me, and I were strengthened before him. But I can look  upon thee in the natural man.” Moreover, Moses said: “I will not cease to call  upon God, I have other things to inquire of him; for his glory has been upon me,  wherefore I can judge between him and thee. Depart hence, Satan.” When Moses  had said this Satan cried with a loud voice saying he was the Only Begotten.  Then Moses feared exceedingly but did not cease to call upon the Lord and there  was opened to his vision the bitterness of hell, and in the strength of his  power Moses again rebuked Satan, who with trembling and gnashing of teeth,  departed from him. Moses bore record of all these things, but because of the  wickedness of men it is not had among them.

 

The Work and Glory of the Lord

 

After this trying scene the Lord again spoke with Moses who was commissioned to  deliver the people of Israel from bondage. His eyes were opened and he beheld  many lands and their inhabitants without number. The Lord taught him, and  explained that there were many heavens and many earths like this on which we  stand. They are innumerable to man, yet the Lord knows them all and they are  numbered unto him. These earths were peopled by his children, for his work and  his glory are to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.  Therefore, as one earth and its accompanying heaven shall pass away, having  filled the measure of its creation, so shall others come. There is no end to the  works and the words of the Father, for in this there is eternal progression.  However, our knowledge, in the wisdom of the Lord, is, of necessity, limited to  the earth on which we dwell.

 

Other Important Revelations

 

The information contained in this ancient scripture caused the hearts of the  brethren to rejoice. The Lord continued to pour out knowledge upon them, here a  little, and there a little, as they were able to receive it. Early in July  (1830) another revelation was given to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, in  Harmony, Pennsylvania. They were commanded to return to the Saints in  Colesville, Manchester and Fayette, and the members would support them. They  should expound the scriptures and devote their time exclusively to the cause of  Zion, and if the members should not support them in these labors, then would the  Lord withdraw his blessings. “Be patient in affliction,” said the Lord, “for  thou shalt have many: but endure them, for lo, I am with thee, even unto the end  of thy days.” The afflictions surely came, for Joseph Smith was called on to  suffer, as few men have had to suffer. He was to attend to his calling, for the  Lord would withhold his power in temporal things that he should not have  strength.

 

Oliver Cowdery was also commanded to continue in the ministry and not suppose  that he could say enough in the cause, and if he would be faithful the Lord  would open his mouth and he should have strength such as is not known among men.  This promise was fulfilled, for the Lord blessed Oliver in preaching to that  extent that those who heard him were caused to quake and tremble.1 Power was  given to these men to bless or curse; those who received them they were to  bless, and from those who rejected them they were to withhold their blessing and  to wash their feet against them as a testimony. Should any lay violent hands  upon them, they should command them to be smitten, and the Lord would smite them  in his own due time. They were to take neither purse nor scrip, neither two  coats, as they went forth to prune the vineyard, with a mighty pruning, “even  for the last time.”

 

Emma Smith to Select Hymns

 

In the same month (July, 1830) the Lord gave a revelation to Emma Smith, the  wife of Joseph Smith, in which she was commanded not to murmur because of the  things which she had not seen. As many other wives have thought, she could not  understand why her husband should withhold from her a view of sacred things. The  Lord assured her that it was for a wise purpose, in him, that these things were  withheld, except from the few who were called to be witnesses to the world. She  was called “an elect lady” whose duty it was to expound scripture, and exhort  the Church, as she was directed by the Spirit; but more especially was she  called to assist her husband in writing and to be his scribe, that Oliver  Cowdery might be relieved to attend to other duties. She was also chosen to  make a selection of sacred hymns for the Church, “for,” said the Lord, “my soul  delighteth in the song of the heart, yea, the song of the righteous is a prayer  unto me, and it shall be answered with a blessing upon their heads.” If she  would continue in meekness, and beware of pride, and keep the commandments of  the Lord, she should receive a crown of righteousness; except she did this,  where the Lord was she should not come, which truth applied to all.

 

Notes

 

1.  Statement of President Wilford Woodruff, Deseret News, March 3, 1889.

 

Chapter 14 The Public Ministry of the Church (2). 1830

 

Oliver Cowdery’s Error

 

Another revelation given in July, 1830, instructed Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery  and John Whitmer, to devote their time to the study of the scriptures, to  preaching and confirming the Church in Colesville, and performing such labors as  should be required of them, until after they should go to the west to hold  conference. All things were to be done in the Church by common consent, in  prayer and faith. Oliver Cowdery returned to Fayette and Joseph began to arrange  the revelations ready for recording. In this work he was assisted by John  Whitmer. While they were thus engaged a letter was received from Oliver Cowdery  commanding Joseph “in the name of God to erase” certain words from one of the  revelations, “that no priestcraft be amongst us.” Joseph immediately answered by  letter that he could not alter the revelations of the Lord. It became necessary,  however, for him to make a trip to Fayette to correct the error in Oliver’s  mind, for the latter had convinced several others that the revelation was wrong.  After some difficulty and earnest prayer, they were all convinced that the words  of the revelation were right, and peace again prevailed.

 

Instructions on the Sacrament

 

In the month of August, Newel Knight and his wife came to Harmony on a visit. As  the wives of Newel Knight and Joseph Smith had neither of them been confirmed,  that matter was attended to at this time. A meeting was held in which the four  and John Whitmer participated, and desiring to partake of the sacrament, Joseph  set out to purchase some wine. He had not proceeded far from his door when he  was met by an angel who gave him the following commandment:

 

 “Listen to the voice of Jesus Christ, your Lord, your God, and your Redeemer,  whose word is quick and powerful. For behold, I say unto you, that it mattereth  not what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink, when ye partake of the sacrament,  if it so be that ye do it with an eye single to my glory; remembering unto the  Father my body which was laid down for you, and my blood which was shed for the  remission of your sins. Wherefore, a commandment I give unto you, that you shall  not purchase wine, neither strong drink of your enemies: Wherefore, you shall  partake of none, except it is made new among you; yea, in this my Father’s  kingdom which shall be built up on the earth.”

 

This is one of the many important revelations (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 27) given to  the Church. The knowledge that it matters not what we eat or drink, if we  partake of the sacrament in the Spirit of the Lord and by divine authority, is  the foundation for the present practice in the Church of using water instead of  wine, for so the Lord has commanded.

 

In September the Lord added to this revelation stating that the time would come  when he would “drink of the fruit of the vine” on the earth with the ancient  prophets and apostles, from Michael, or Adam, the “ancient of days,” down to our  own day, including all the faithful whom the Father has given him out of the  world.

 

In obedience to the above commandment, they prepared wine of their own making  and partook of the sacrament, confirming the two sisters as members of the  Church.

 

Joseph Moves to Fayette

 

The spirit of persecution became so strong in Harmony, that Joseph Smith was  forced to leave and take up his residence in Fayette. Even his father-in-law,  Isaac Hale, turned against him because of the falsehoods which were circulated  and the prejudice existing in the neighborhood. This bitterness he retained  throughout his life. In August, Joseph and Hyrum Smith, with John and David  Whitmer, went to Colesville and visited the members of the Church residing  there. They prayed that the eyes of their enemies might be blinded, for the  enmity in Colesville was extreme. Their prayers were answered, and though they  passed by a number of the most bitter of the mobocrats, who looked intently upon  them, yet they were not recognized. In the evening of the day of their arrival   a meeting was held and those who had been previously baptized were all  confirmed. They partook of the sacrament, sang and praised the Lord in  testimony without molestation. The next morning the brethren took leave of the  Saints in peace and in due time arrived home in safety.

 

Spurious Revelations of Hiram Page

 

Shortly after Joseph Smith made his home in Fayette, Satan commenced a subtle  attack upon the work within the Church. Hiram Page, one of the eight witnesses,  obtained a stone with which he was receiving revelations purporting to be for  the guidance of the Church; but these revelations were at variance with those  given to Joseph Smith, and also with the teachings of the Savior and his  apostles, as contained in the New Testament. Oliver Cowdery and members of the  Whitmer family were deceived. Through the Prophet the Lord gave a revelation to  Oliver Cowdery in which the order of heaven, in regard to revelation, was  pointed out for the guidance of the Church. “Behold, verily, verily, I say unto  thee,” said the Lord, “no one shall be appointed to receive commandments and  revelations in this Church, excepting my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., for he  receiveth them even as Moses; and thou shalt be obedient unto the things which I  shall give unto him, even as Aaron, to declare faithfully the commandments and  the revelations, with power and authority in the Church.” It was further stated  that there should be none other appointed to receive revelations, until the Lord  should appoint another in his stead, for he held the keys of this power. Oliver  was instructed to take Hiram Page, alone, and tell him that the revelations he  had received were not from the Lord, but were given through the power of Satan,  who had deceived him. Oliver was also instructed that he was to write by wisdom,  but he was not to command him who was at the head.

 

The Mission to the Lamanites

 

The Lord, in this revelation, appointed Oliver Cowdery to take a mission to the  Lamanites in the west, “and inasmuch as they receive thy teachings,” it read,  “thou shalt cause my Church to be established among them.” There were other  reasons for this mission, which were not fully revealed. It is probable that in  the spurious revelations of Hiram Page some reference was made to the building  of the city Zion. In any case, the Lord explained that it was not revealed, and  no man knew, where the city Zion shall be built, “but it shall be given  hereafter. Behold, I say unto you, that it shall be on the borders of the  Lamanites.” This mission was not to be taken until after the conference which  had been appointed for the 26th of September. Oliver was also first to settle  the difficulty with Hiram Page, who was to be taught that he had not been  appointed to receive revelations for the Church.

 

The Doctrine of Gathering Destruction of the Wicked

 

Again the heavens were opened and the Lord made known many of his purposes and  decrees which were for these latter days. A revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 29)  was given shortly before the second conference of the Church, containing  instruction which was helpful for the guidance of the elders at that conference.  They were taught the doctrine of the gathering of the Saints. The decree had  gone forth from the mansions of the Father, that the Saints should be gathered  into one place, for they were chosen out of the world, and they were to prepare  their hearts against the day when tribulation and desolation would be sent forth  upon the wicked. The hour is nigh, the Lord declared, when the earth should be  ripe for destruction, for wickedness shall cease.

 

Because of the wickedness of the world, for the inhabitants thereof will not  repent, the Lord should send forth terrible plagues to torment mankind. Great  hailstorms should destroy the crops of the earth; flies shall “take hold of the  inhabitants” and eat their flesh; their tongues shall be staid, and their flesh  fall from their bones and their eyes from their sockets. The beasts of the  forests, and the fowls of the air shall eat their bodies, and the great and  abominable church, which shall endure until the end of unrighteousness on the  earth, shall be cast down by devouring fire, as Ezekiel had said, for  abomination must not reign.

 

All these things were predicted by the apostles and must be fulfilled; and the  twelve who were with the Savior in his ministry shall come in glory to judge the  house of Israel who have been faithful, “and none else.” The trump shall sound,  the righteous dead will rise and Christ reign on the earth with his Saints for a  thousand years. After the thousand years are ended, and men begin again to  forsake the Lord, the earth shall be spared but for a little season. The final  resurrection shall come; the righteous received in to eternal life and the  wicked banished to partake of the second death with the devil and his angels.  The second death is that same death which was first pronounced on Adam   banishment from the presence of the Lord. Those who partake of it cannot return,  for they have no power. Then shall come the redemption of the earth, for old  things shall pass away and all things become new, yet not “one hair, neither  mote, shall be lost” for it is the workmanship of the hands of the Lord.

 

The Second Conference of the Church

 

According to appointment, on the 26th of September, the Church met in conference  at Fayette. There were present eight elders, four priests and two teachers when  the conference convened. Thirty-five persons had joined the Church, making a  total of sixty-two in all. Joseph Smith opened the meeting with prayer and then  read the fifth chapter of Isaiah, which speaks of the gathering, and made  comments thereon. The matter of Hiram Page’s “peepstone” was discussed and after  considerable investigation, Hiram Page and all who were present, renounced the  stone, and there was mutual satisfaction and happiness again. At this  conference, which continued for three days, the Spirit of the Lord was manifest;  much business was attended to, and those previously baptized were confirmed.  Special prayer was offered in behalf of Oliver Cowdery and Peter Whitmer, Jr.,  who were called to go to the Lamanites. Peter Whitmer, Jr., was called by  revelation at this conference to that mission. When the conference adjourned it  was to meet January 1, 1831, and David Whitmer was appointed to keep the record.  There were some baptisms during the conference and a number of the brethren were  ordained.

 

The Call to Ziba Peterson and Parley P. Pratt

 

A great desire being made manifest on the part of others to accompany Oliver  Cowdery and Peter Whitmer, Jr., to the Lamanites, it was made a matter of  inquiry before the Lord. The result was that Ziba Peterson and Parley P. Pratt  were also appointed to go. Ziba Peterson was among the first baptized and was an  elder at the first conference of the Church. Parley P. Pratt was a resident of  the wilderness of Ohio not far from the city of Cleveland. While on a missionary  tour for the “Disciples” or “Campbellites,” as they are called, and a visit to  his former home in Columbia County, New York, he first heard of the Book of  Mormon through a Baptist preacher by the name of Hamlin, who placed a copy in  his hands. After reading it partly through Parley changed his plans and went to  Manchester in search of the Prophet Joseph Smith. There he met Hyrum Smith who  taught him the Gospel and presented him with a copy of the Book of Mormon which  he again very carefully read. Late in August, with Hyrum Smith, he journeyed to  Fayette, where he was baptized by Oliver Cowdery about the first of September.  Shortly afterwards he was ordained an elder and then continued on his journey to  his father’s home. There he preached the Gospel to his parents and many of his  boyhood friends. His younger brother, Orson, a youth 19 years of age, readily  accepted his message and became a member of the Church. Returning to Fayette,  Parley P. Pratt was appointed by revelation to take the missionary journey with  Oliver Cowdery to the borders of Missouri, among the Lamanites.

 

The Missionaries Depart

 

In the fall of 1830, these four missionaries started on their journey to the  west. On their way they preached the Gospel among the people as opportunity  would permit. Near Buffalo, New York, they visited the Catteraugus Indians and  left two copies of the Book of Mormon with members of the tribe who could read,  and then continued on their journey. When they came to Kirtland, Ohio, near the  home of Elder Pratt, they tarried for some time. Parley P. Pratt was acquainted  with Mr. Sidney Rigdon, one of the leaders of the “Disciples,” who with  Alexander Campbell and Walter Scott, had been instrumental in the founding of  that sect. They believed in the doctrines of faith, repentance and baptism for  the remission of sins; but accepted the Bible as the only guide unto salvation.  Convinced that the religious world had gone astray, these men had formed this  organization with sincere desire to follow closely the teachings of the early  disciples of the Lord. Through his preaching Sidney Rigdon had converted many  souls unto this faith.

 

Parley P. Pratt, believing that many of the “Disciples” would readily receive  the truth, had persuaded his fellow missionaries to spend some time among them  in Ohio where they were located on what was called the “Western Reserve.”

 

Sidney Rigdon

 

The first house at which they called, in Mentor, was the home of Sidney Rigdon.  After the usual greetings, they presented Mr. Rigdon with a copy of the Book of  Mormon, stating that it contained the record of the ancient people of America,  and that the Lord had again established his Church in the earth with the  authority of the Holy Priesthood. This was the first time Sidney Rigdon had  heard of the Book of Mormon and of Joseph Smith. Replying to their statements,  he said he had the Bible, which he believed to be the word of God; as for the  Book of Mormon, he had considerable doubt of its divinity. He refused to argue  with them, but promised to read the book. At their earnest solicitation Sidney  Rigdon allowed the elders to hold meetings in his chapel. A large congregation  assembled and gave close attention to the remarks of the elders. At the  conclusion of the services Sidney Rigdon instructed the people to consider  carefully the remarkable things they had heard, lest it should prove to be the  truth. With deep and earnest study, he read the contents of the Book of Mormon,  praying for divine guidance, and in the course of about two weeks, he received a  manifestation so that he could say, “Flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto  me, but my Father, which is in heaven.” He and his wife were then baptized and  also many of his congregation.

 

In Kirtland the elders were also successful. The people besieged the  missionaries both day and night, until they had very little time for rest. The  greater number heard the tidings gladly, but some, there were, who came to  dispute and oppose the work of the Lord. In a very short time branches of the  Church were established numbering in all about one thousand souls.

 

The Journey Continued

 

The missionary elders continued on their journey after a stay of two or three  weeks in Kirtland, leaving a number of the new converts to continue with the  work. Sidney Rigdon, Frederick G. Williams, Isaac Morley, John Murdock, Lyman  Wight and Edward Partridge later became members of the Church and were ordained  to the Priesthood.

 

Having accomplished this great work, and leaving watchmen for the tender flock,  the missionaries took Dr. Frederick G. Williams with them. About fifty miles  west of Kirtland, they passed through the country where Parley P. Pratt first  made settlement in the western country. Here, again, they made a stop and  preached the Gospel. The people were all excited over the things they had heard,  for the knowledge of the labors of the brethren had preceded them. Other  converts were made, including Simeon Carter, and although some opposition and  bitterness was manifest, in the course of a short time a branch was raised up  numbering about sixty souls. Arriving near the border of Ohio, the missionaries  spent some days among the Wyandots, who received them kindly and rejoiced in the  story of their fathers as they learned it from the Book of Mormon. In the city  of Cincinnati they spent several days, and being disappointed in not being able  to take boat, continued on their journey afoot to St. Louis. In the midst of  winter weather, and suffering great hardships in a country little traveled by  man, they pursued their journey till they arrived at Independence, Jackson  County, Missouri, at that time scarcely more than a trading post on the borders  of the United States. They reached Independence early in the year 1831; their  journey had taken them a distance of nearly fifteen hundred miles, through a  wilderness, in the most inclement season of the year. Four months had they been  upon the journey, but during that time they had preached the Gospel to many  thousands of white people and two nations of Indians. Churches had been built up  and the work advanced along the route of their travels. This was the first  missionary journey west of the state of New York, and its results were to be of  incalculable benefit to the Church in years to come.

 

The Book of Mormon Taken to the Lamanites

 

In the land of the Lamanites, the elders preached the Gospel to the Delawares,  presenting them with the Book of Mormon which they received with rejoicing.  Oliver Cowdery explained to them in detail the coming forth of the Book of  Mormon. A Mr. Pool, who believed the testimony of these elders, became their  interpreter. Several of the Indians could read, and to them they gave copies of  the Book of Mormon. The Indians answered them by saying: “We feel thankful to  our white friends who have come so far, and been at such pains to tell us good  news, and especially this new news concerning the book of our forefathers; it  makes us glad in here,” and the speaker for the tribe placed his hand on his  heart. This good labor, however, was not to last, for the excitement reached the  settlements in Missouri, and due to the efforts of sectarian priests the Indian  agents ordered the missionaries out of the Indian country as disturbers of the  peace, threatening to use military force in case of non-compliance. With  disappointment they withdrew and thus ended the first mission to the Lamanites.  From this time on they devoted their labors to the white people in Jackson  County. However, they had declared the message of salvation to three great  tribes, the Catteraugus, in New York, the Wyandots of Ohio, and the Delawares,  west of Missouri.

 

It was now decided that Parley P. Pratt should return to Kirtland, and perhaps  to New York to report their labors, visit the branches they had organized on  their journey, and procure more books. In February he started on his journey,  alone. In Kirtland he met the Prophet, who had come to that place, and to him he  made a report.

 

Part Three The Ohio and Missouri Period

 

Chapter 15 Removal of the Church in New York to Ohio. 1830 through 1831

 

“A Crooked Generation”

 

In October 1830, Ezra Thayer and Northrop Sweet were called by revelation, as  they had sought the will of the Lord, to preach the Gospel unto “a crooked and  perverse generation.” “My vineyard,” declared the Lord, “has become corrupt  every whit; and there is none which doth good save it be a few; and they err in  many instances because of priestcrafts; all having corrupt minds. And verily,  verily, I say unto you, that this Church have I established and called forth out  of the wilderness: and even so will I gather mine elect from the four quarters  of the earth, even as many as will believe in me, and hearken unto my voice.”

 

Call of Edward Partridge and Orson Pratt

 

In November Orson Pratt, the younger brother of Parley P. Pratt, who had been  baptized by his brother Parley a few weeks earlier in Canaan, Columbia County,  N. Y., came to Fayette to learn the will of the Lord concerning himself. In the  following December Sidney Rigdon came from Ohio on a similar visit, bringing  with him a young man named Edward Partridge, who was not a member of the Church.  Edward Partridge, the day after his arrival, satisfied with what he had seen and  heard, was baptized by Joseph Smith and later was confirmed by Sidney Rigdon.  Both of these young men, Orson Pratt and Edward Partridge, were called to labor  in the ministry and received the commendation and blessing of the Lord for their  faith and desire to serve him. “And this commandment,” said the Lord, “shall be  given unto the elders of my Church, that every man which will embrace it with  singleness of heart, may be ordained and sent forth, even as I have spoken.”

 

Sidney Rigdon to Write

 

Sidney Rigdon was commanded to be a companion to Joseph Smith and to “forsake  him not;” moreover, he was to write for him, “and the scriptures shall be given,  even as they are in mine own bosom, to the salvation of mine elect,” was the  word of the Lord to him.

 

Lost Scriptures Restored

 

By commandment of the Lord, a revision of the scriptures by inspiration had  already commenced. Much conjecture frequently occurred among the Saints  regarding scripture mentioned in the Bible that could not be found. They had  learned in the reading of the Book of Mormon, “that many plain and precious  things” had been taken away from the Bible as it went forth among the Gentiles.  Many of these the Lord promised to restore. From time to time, as their labors  would permit, the Prophet received by revelation these scriptures which, were  lost, and Sidney Rigdon wrote for him. Shortly after the coming of Sidney Rigdon  to Fayette, the Lord revealed the writings of Enoch, spoken of by Jude, which  caused much rejoicing among the Saints. These revelations now form a part of the  Book of Moses, in the Pearl of Great Price.

 

Command to Go to Ohio

 

Soon after the restoration of the words of Enoch, the Lord commanded that the  correction of the scriptures should cease until Joseph Smith and companions  could remove to Ohio. Such a step was necessary, the Lord declared, “because of  the enemy and for your sakes.” However, they were not to go in haste, but first  to strengthen the several branches of the Church in New York; especially that at  Colesville, where the members exercised much faith. Not only were Joseph and the  brethren with him to go to Ohio, but the Lord instructed all the Saints in New  York also to journey there, “against the time” when Oliver Cowdery should return  from the Lamanites.

 

Conference of January, 1831

 

In January, 1831, a conference was held in Fayette. Ordinary business was  transacted and a revelation given in which the Lord made known the reason for  the removal of the Church to the West (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 38). “All eternity is  pained,” the revelation read, “and the angels are waiting the great command to  reap down the earth, to gather the tares that they may be burned.” This was  because “all flesh is corrupted” and the powers of darkness prevail. The Lord  revealed that the wicked were plotting in secret chambers the destruction of  Joseph Smith and the Church. However, he would lead the Saints, to a land of  promise, and they and their children after them should possess it forever, if  they would seek it with all their hearts as an inheritance. This reference was  to Zion, the location of which the Lord had not yet revealed. They were  commanded to assemble in Ohio, and there he would give unto them his law and  these things should be made known. They were to dispose of their property as  best they could; farms that could not be sold should be rented, and men of  wisdom were to be appointed to look after the interests of the poor and needy  and send them forth to the place the Lord commanded them.

 

In the latter part of January, Joseph Smith and his wife, accompanied by Sidney  Rigdon and Edward Partridge, moved to Kirtland. They were welcomed there by  Newel K. Whitney, and Joseph and his wife remained in the Whitney home for  several weeks receiving every kindness and attention which could be shown in  Christian love.

 

The Branch in Kirtland

 

The branch of the Church in Kirtland had been living according to a plan called  “common stock” or the holding of all property in common. This arrangement had  been in practice before they joined the Church, but false spirits crept in among  them causing them to receive strange notions in variance with the Gospel plan.  With a little caution and exercise of wisdom, the Prophet persuaded them to  abandon this plan and their difficulties were removed.

 

The Law Given to Govern the Church

 

On the fourth of February, the Lord gave direction by revelation that the elders  of the Church should assemble together to agree on his word; for he would give  them his law by which the Church was to be governed. Instructions were also  given that Joseph Smith should have a house built wherein he could live and  translate, and receive the ancient scriptures from the Lord. Edward Partridge  was to receive the office of bishop in the Church and to spend all his time in  that ministry, leaving his merchandise, to labor in the interests of the members  of the Church.

 

At Kirtland, on the 9th of February, in the presence of twelve elders, the Lord  revealed his law by which the Church was to be governed, according to the  promise given in Fayette. This important revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 42) may  be termed a code of laws for the government and guidance of the members of the  Church. Their attitude towards the law of the land as well as the moral law was  clearly established. As members of the Church they were to keep the Church  covenants and articles, and the Lord would reveal unto them, from time to time,  other covenants sufficient to establish them in Ohio and later in the New  Jerusalem, or city of Zion, the site of which would presently be revealed. The  duties of the bishop and other officers in the Church were defined. Idlers were  condemned; for, said the Lord, “the idler shall not eat the bread nor wear the  garments of the laborer.” The Bible and the Book or Mormon were to be the  standards on doctrine, and they who have not the Spirit were not to teach. The  manner of administering to the sick was explained, and the Saints instructed to  live together in love. This is one of the very important revelations given to  the Church.

 

A Woman’s “Revelation”

 

Soon after this revelation was given a woman named Hubble came among the people  pretending to have revelations, and professing to be a prophetess of the Lord.  By declaring that the Book of Mormon was the word of the Lord, and appearing to  be very righteous, she deceived some of the Saints.

 

For the benefit of the members a revelation was received by Joseph Smith in  which the Church was instructed to hearken to him, for there was none other  appointed to receive revelations for the Church, and none other should be  appointed while he lived, if he remained true to his trust. This commandment had  previously been given, when Hiram Page was led into error; but it seemed the  Lord must speak again on this point before the Saints could understand. The  members of the Church were instructed to purge themselves from all iniquity, and  the Lord would give them knowledge, even the mysteries of his kingdom would be  revealed, if they would sustain and assist Joseph Smith. The elders were  instructed to go forth and preach the Gospel, laboring in the vineyard for the  last time, for the Lord would shortly come upon the earth in judgment.

 

Important Revelations to The Church

 

During the spring and summer of 1831, a number of important revelations were  received. On March 7, the Lord made known many things (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 45)  pertaining to his second coming and the signs of the times. After revealing in  clearness the teachings given to his disciples in Jerusalem, relative to the  destruction of the temple, the scattering of the Jews, and the signs which  should precede his second coming, he made known many things which should take  place in the day in which we live. He spoke of the signs and wonders; of the  gathering of the Jews; the darkening of the sun and the bathing of the moon in  blood; of his second coming and his judgments upon the nations; the redemption  of the Jews, who shall look upon him whom they have pierced; the binding of  Satan; the millennial reign, and the redemption of heathen nations and those  who knew no law.

 

Zion a Place of Refuge  Zion, the New Jerusalem, shall be built and there the righteous shall come to  Zion from among all nations, singing songs of everlasting joy. They will be the  only people who will not be at war, and every man who will not take up his sword  against his neighbor, must flee to Zion for safety. Such is to be the condition  of the world before the coming of the Lord.

 

John Whitmer, Historian

 

In another revelation John Whitmer was appointed to keep the records of the  Church, and assist Joseph Smith in transcribing all things given for the  history.

 

“For,” said the revelation, “Oliver Cowdery I have appointed to another office.  Wherefore it shall be given him (Whitmer) in as much as he is faithful, by the  Comforter, to write these things.”

 

The Purchase of Lands

 

As the Saints in New York had been commanded to settle in Ohio, the residents in  that place were instructed to impart of their lands, as they were able to do,  for the benefit of their brethren from the east for it was needful that they  should remain in Ohio for a time. Eventually, however, it was expected that they  would move farther westward, and the members of the Church were to save their  money for the purpose of buying lands for an inheritance in the city Zion, when  the location of that place should be revealed. This information should be made  known when the brethren arrived from the east, for to them it was to be  revealed. “And they shall be appointed to purchase the lands, and to make a  commencement to lay the foundation of the city, and then shall you begin to be  gathered with your families, every man according to his family  as is appointed  to him by the presidency and the bishop of the Church.”

 

Equality Among the Families

 

In the month of May the Saints from New York commenced to arrive in Ohio, and it  fell to the lot of Bishop Partridge to assign to them their lands. They were to  be made equal according to their families and their needs. The head of each  family was to receive a certificate to secure him and his portion and  inheritance in the Church. Should a man transgress, after receiving his portion  and standing, he was not to have power to claim that portion which had been  consecrated to the bishop for the use of the poor and needy of the Church; but  he could retain that portion which was deeded to him. A storehouse was to be  provided and the substance of the people, more than needful for individual use,  was to be placed therein, for the wants of the people, to be kept by the bishop,  who was to distribute it as the necessities of the people should demand. In this  manner the doctrine of consecration was partially put into practice, as a  preparatory step before the members of the Church should go to Zion  for in Zion  the law of the united order, or consecration of properties, was the law upon  which that city should be built. “And thus I grant unto this people,” the Lord  declared, with reference to the New York Saints, “a privilege of organizing  themselves according to my laws; and I consecrate unto them this land for a  little season, until I, the Lord, shall provide for them otherwise, and command  them to go hence.”

 

The Important Conference of June 1831

 

In the month of February the Lord had commanded that word be sent out to the  elders of the Church calling them from the east and from the west; from the  north and from the south; to meet in conference and receive instruction.  Accordingly, a conference was set for June 3, which convened at Kirtland and  continued until the sixth. The Spirit of the Lord was displayed in a marvelous  way, and the power of the evil one, which was made manifest in opposition to the  work, was successfully rebuked.

 

The First High Priests Ordained

 

At this conference the first high priests in this dispensation were ordained.  Lyman Wight, John Murdock, Reynolds Cahoon, Harvey Whitlock and Hyrum Smith,  were ordained to the office of high priest, by Joseph Smith the Prophet; Joseph  Smith, Sen., Joseph Smith the Prophet, Parley P. Pratt, Thomas B. Marsh, Isaac  Morley, Edward Partridge, Joseph Wakefield, Martin Harris, Ezra Thayer, Ezra  Booth, John Corrill, Samuel H. Smith, John Whitmer and Sidney Rigdon, were  ordained to the office of high priest, under the hands of Lyman Wight. Edward  Partridge, the bishop of the Church, then blessed those who had been ordained.  John Corrill and Isaac Morley were then sustained and ordained as assistants, or  counselors, to Bishop Whitney, under the hands of Lyman Wight. All this was done  by commandment from the Lord.

 

The Mission of John

 

During the conference, Joseph Smith the Prophet was led to say, “that John the  Revelator was then among the ten tribes of Israel who had been led away by  Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, to prepare them for their return from their long  dispersion.”

 

The Elders Called to Missouri

 

The spirit of prophecy was abundantly manifest and during the sessions of this  conference a number of revelations were received. Many of the elders were called  to take their journey through the western country, going two by two, preaching  the Gospel, and were to assemble again in Jackson County, Missouri, where the  next conference was to be held. The Lord said to them: “And thus, even as I have  said if ye are faithful, ye shall assemble yourselves together to rejoice upon  the land of Missouri, which is the land of your inheritance, which is now the  land of your enemies. But, behold, I the Lord, will hasten the city in its  time, and will crown the faithful with joy and with rejoicing.”

 

The Thompson Branch

 

The members of the Church from Colesville, New York, on their arrival in Ohio,  were located at a place called Thompson, about sixteen miles northwest of  Kirtland. Here, as we have learned, they were directed to live according to the  Lord’s law, that is, the order of stewardship and consecration of properties.  Among these people there resided a man named Leman Copley, who was a member of  the “Shaking Quakers” before he joined the Church. He owned a large tract of  land which he agreed to turn over to the Colesville branch to occupy in this  manner of stewardship, agreeable with the revelation they had received. It  appears that Copley had not been fully converted to the Gospel and he, with  some others, later rebelled and broke the covenant of consecration. This caused  confusion among the Colesville Saints and placed them at the mercy of their  enemies, as well as in jeopardy before the Lord. In their distress they sent  Newel Knight, who was in charge of the branch at Thompson, to the Prophet to  learn what they should do. The Lord spoke unto them saying that their covenant  had been broken and therefore was of no effect, and it would have been better  for the one who was responsible for the offense, “had he been drowned in the  depth of the sea.” The members of the branch were now commanded to journey to  Missouri, “unto the borders of the Lamanites,” and there they were to seek “a  living like unto men,” until the Lord might prepare a place for them. Almost  immediately they took their departure under the guidance of Newel Knight, for  Missouri.

 

A Letter from Missouri

 

A few days following the conference a letter was received from Oliver Cowdery,  dated May 7, giving an account of the labors of himself and companions in  Missouri. He spoke of their labors among the Lamanites, and of a tribe of  “Navashoes” farther to the west, near Santa Fe. Almost the whole country where  he and his fellow laborers were located, he declared, consisted of  “Universalists, Atheists, Presbyterians, Methodists, Baptists, and other  professing Christians, priests and people; with all the devils from the infernal  pit, united and foaming out their shame,” against the elders of the Church. Then  he adds: “God forbid that I should bring a railing accusation against them, for  vengeance belongs to him who is able to pay.” His expressed opinion of these  inhabitants of the border land was all too true, as events immediately to follow  will attest.

 

The Mission to the West

 

About the middle of June (1831) the elders who were appointed at the conference,  commenced their journey westward, traveling two by two. Ezra Thayer, the  companion chosen for Thomas B. Marsh, failed to go. Selah J. Griffin was  appointed to go in his stead. On the 19th of June, Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon,  Martin Harris, Edward Partridge, William W. Phelps, Joseph Coe, and Algernon  Sidney Gilbert, took up their journey for Missouri. All these missionaries, and  others not here mentioned, commenced their travels with great anticipation of  what the result would be. Their destination was the “land of their inheritance,”  where Zion the New Jerusalem should be built. The Lord had promised that the  site for this holy city should be revealed to them at their journey’s end.

 

 Chapter 16 The Land of Zion Its Dedication. 1831

 

Character of Inhabitants

 

About the middle of July, 1831, the missionaries commenced to arrive in western  Missouri, and were met with tears of joy by their brethren there. Here, on the  borders of the United States, had gathered renegades from the east; lawless and  vile outcasts, who had been forced to flee to the west for safety. “How natural  it was,” wrote the Prophet, “to observe the degradation, leanness of intellect,  ferocity, and jealousy, of a people that were nearly a century behind the  times.”

 

First Sabbath in Zion

 

The first Sabbath (July 17, 1831), the elders spent in Jackson County, William  W. Phelps preached a public discourse. His congregation was composed of  “specimens of all the families of the earth.” After this meeting two persons,  who had previously believed, were baptized.

 

Arrival of the Colesville Branch

 

A few days later the members of the Colesville branch, from Thompson, Ohio,  arrived in Missouri and were located on lands in Kaw township, where a portion  of Kansas City is now built.

 

Assignment of Labors

 

The duty devolved on the Prophet to assign the labors to the several elders who  were to remain in the Land. Some of them were called by revelation to make their  permanent settlement in Missouri, while others were instructed to return to the  eastern lands, after their mission in the west was finished. William W. Phelps,  who joined the Church at the time the little band of missionaries were leaving  Ohio for Missouri, had previously been instructed by the Lord (Doc. and Cov.  Sec. 55) to engage with Oliver Cowdery, in the work of printing and selecting  and writing books for schools in the Church, that “little children also may  receive instruction” which would be pleasing to the Lord. Upon his arrival in  Jackson County, this commandment was repeated.

 

Algernon Sidney Gilbert was appointed to act as agent for the Church in  receiving moneys and buying lands on which the Saints might locate. Edward  Partridge was to act in his calling as bishop of the Church. His great duty was  to divide the inheritances of the members, severally, according to their needs.  In this manner duties were assigned to each of those expected to remain as a  nucleus for the building up of Zion (Doc. and Cov. Sections 57 through 58).

 

Location of the City Revealed

 

As the Lord had promised, he now fulfilled. In answer to the questions: “When  will the wilderness blossom as the rose? When will Zion be built up in her  glory, and where will thy temple stand, unto which all nations shall come in the  last days?” the Lord gave the following:

 

 “Hearken, O ye elders of my Church, saith the Lord your God, who have assembled  yourselves together, according to my commandments, in this land, which is the  land of Missouri, which is the land which I have appointed and consecrated for  the gathering of the Saints: wherefore this is the land of promise, and the  place for the city of Zion. And thus saith the Lord your God, if you will  receive wisdom, here is wisdom: behold, the place which is now called  Independence, is the center place, and the spot for the temple is lying  westward, upon a lot which is not far from the court house. Wherefore it is  wisdom that the land should be purchased by the Saints; and also every tract  lying westward even unto the line running directly between Jew and Gentile. And  also every tract bordering by the prairies, inasmuch as my disciples are enabled  to buy lands. Behold, this is wisdom, that they may obtain it for an everlasting  inheritance” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 57).

 

The Saints to Keep the Law

 

In another revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 58) given at this time, the members of  the Church were commanded to keep the law the Lord had given them, as well as to  observe the laws of the land. “Let no man think he is ruler,” it read, “but let  God rule him that judgeth, according to the counsel of his own will; or, in  other words, him that counseleth or sitteth upon the judgment seat. Let no man  break the laws of the land, for he that keepeth the laws of God hath no need to  break the laws of the land: wherefore, be subject to the powers that be, until  he reigns whose right it is to reign, and subdues all enemies under his feet.”

 

After Much Tribulation, the Blessings

 

That Zion was to be established and the city built at once, was evidently the  idea possessed by some of the Saints; moreover, that they were at liberty to  establish their own laws, independent of all else. Hence the instructions as  here given by the Lord regarding the keeping of the law. The Lord had warned  them previously and given instruction in regard to their duties and requirements  in that land. That the city was not to be built at that time is indicated in his  word: “Ye cannot behold with your natural eyes, for the present time, the design  of your God concerning those things which shall come hereafter, and the glory  which shall follow after much tribulation. For after much tribulation cometh  the blessings. Wherefore the day cometh that ye shall be crowned with much  glory; the hour is not yet, but is nigh at hand. Remember this, which I tell you  before, that you may lay it to heart, and receive that which shall follow.  Behold, verily I say unto you, for this cause I have sent you that you might be  obedient, and that your hearts might be prepared to bear testimony of the things  which are to come and also that you might be honored of laying the foundation,  and of bearing record of the land upon which the Zion of God shall stand” (Doc.  and Cov. Sec. 58).

 

From this we see that the glory and greatness of the city Zion was reserved for  the future; although in the scriptural sense, the time “is nigh at hand.” These  early settlers were to lay the foundation, and prepare the way for the Saints,  who were yet to come, after the preaching of the Gospel “to the uttermost parts  of the earth;” for the elders were to “push the people together from the ends of  the earth.” It was a great honor conferred upon the first laborers in the  vineyard, if they would be faithful to every command.

 

Dedication of the Land

 

The Colesville Saints were located in Kaw township. The Prophet assisted them in  laying the first log, “for a house, as a foundation of Zion” in that place. The  log was carried by twelve men representing the twelve tribes of Israel. At the  same time it was made manifest through prayer that the land should be  consecrated and dedicated by Sidney Rigdon. “It was a season of joy,” the  Prophet said, “to those present, and afforded a glimpse of the future, which  time will yet unfold to the satisfaction of the faithful.” All this took place  on the second day of August, 1831.

 

Sidney Rigdon, according to his appointment, stood up and asked:

 

“Do you receive this land for the land of your inheritance, with thankful  hearts, from the Lord?”

 

“We do.”

 

“Do you pledge yourselves to keep the law of God on this land, which you never  have kept in your own lands?”

 

“We do.”

 

“Do you pledge yourselves to see that others of your brethren who shall come  hither do keep the laws of God?”

 

“We do.”

 

After prayer, Elder Rigdon arose and said: “I now pronounce this land  consecrated and dedicated unto the Lord for a possession and inheritance for the  Saints, and for all the faithful servants of the Lord, to the uttermost ages of  time, in the name of Jesus Christ, having authority from him. Amen” (Documentary  History of the Church, vol. 1:196).

 

Description of the Land

 

In addition to the appointment to dedicate the land, Sidney Rigdon was also  called by revelation to write a description of it, to be sent “unto all the  churches.” One object of this description was to stir up the Saints to donate  for the purchase of the lands, by placing in the hands of the bishop money for  that purpose. Those who would do this should be given an inheritance, for Zion  was to be built by purchase; otherwise they could not obtain it except by the  shedding of blood, which was forbidden. The first description written was  rejected by the Lord, and Sidney Rigdon was commanded to write another.

 

The Future Glory of Zion

 

Many of the ancient prophets spoke of Zion and her glory. Isaiah declared that  in the latter days “out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord  from Jerusalem,” in that day when swords will be made into plowshares, and  spears into pruning-hooks.”1 Moreover, again he prophesied, saying:

 

 “For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those  nations shall be utterly wasted. The glory of Lebanon shall come unto thee, the  fir tree, the pine tree, and the box together, to beautify the place of my  sanctuary; and I will make the place of my feet glorious. The sons also of them  that afflicted thee shall come bending unto thee; and all they that despised  thee shall bow themselves down at the soles of thy feet; and they shall call  thee, The city of the Lord, The Zion of the Holy one of Israel. Whereas thou  hast been forsaken and hated, so that no man went through thee, I will make thee  an eternal excellency, a joy of many generations. . .  . For brass I will bring  gold, and for iron I will bring silver, and for wood brass, and for stones iron:  I will also make thy officers peace, and thine exactors righteousness. Violence  shall no more be heard in thy land, wasting nor destruction within thy borders;  but thou shall call thy walls Salvation, and thy gates Praise. The sun shall be  no more thy light by day; neither for brightness shall the moon give light unto  thee; but the Lord shall be unto thee an everlasting light, and thy God thy  glory. Thy son shall no more go down; neither shall thy moon withdraw itself;  for the Lord shall be thine everlasting light, and the days of thy mourning  shall be ended. Thy people also shall be all righteous; they shall inherit the  land forever, the branch of my planting, the work of my hands, that I may be  glorified. A little one shall become a thousand, and a small one a strong  nation: I the Lord will hasten it in his time.”2

 

Dedication of the Temple Site

 

On the 3rd day of August, Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, Sidney Rigdon, Edward  Partridge, William W. Phelps, Martin Harris and Joseph Coe, met on a spot a  little west of the Independence court house, and there they dedicated the site  for the great temple of the latter days. The 87th Psalm was read, and the scene  was most impressive; for here the house of the Lord was to be reared in the holy  city Zion, which had been spoken of by ancient seers, from whence should go  forth the law to the ends of the earth.

 

First Conference in Zion

 

On the 4th day of August (1831) the first conference in that land was held at  the home of Joshua Lewis, in Kaw township. The members of the Colesville branch  formed the greater part of the congregation a total of thirty-one souls. The  Spirit of the Lord was with them and they rejoiced. Sidney Rigdon preached and  exhorted the Saints “to obedience to the requisition of heaven,” that they might  be planted in their inheritances in Zion. Ziba Peterson, who had been silenced  for wrongdoing, humbled himself and made confession; by unanimous vote he was  reinstated. Joseph Smith addressed the conference and admonished the people to  be true to their covenants that they might receive the blessings.

 

A Commandment and a Promised Blessing

 

On the 7th, Polly Knight wife of Joseph Knight, Sen., died; she had been in  failing health while on the westward journey. The same day the Prophet received  a revelation of commandment and blessing to the Saints, in which they were  admonished again to keep the commandments of the Lord. Their course of action  was pointed out for them with a statement that all who had come up to the land  to keep the commandments should be blessed; if they lived they should inherit  the earth; if they died they should rest in the mansions of the Father. On the  Lord’s day they were to rest from all labor and assemble in the house of prayer  to partake of the sacrament and confess their sins (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 59).

 

The Return to Kirtland

 

On the 9th day of August Joseph Smith and the elders who were to return, started  on their journey back to Kirtland. They traveled down the Missouri River towards  St. Louis. On the third day out they encountered some of the dangers common on  these waters. At a place called McIlwaine’s Bend, William W. Phelps, in open  vision, saw the destroyer in his power, riding upon the waters. The next morning  the Prophet Joseph received a revelation in confirmation of the vision of Elder  Phelps.

 

Dangers on the Waters

 

The Lord revealed (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 61) to Joseph Smith the great dangers that  would be upon the waters in these latter days. “Behold, I, the Lord, in the  beginning blessed the waters, but in the last days, by the mouth of my servant  John, I cursed the waters. Wherefore, the days will come that no flesh shall be  safe upon the waters.  . . . I, the Lord, have decreed, and the destroyer rideth  upon the face thereof, and I revoke not the decree.” It was further stated that  the time would come when none would dare go upon the waters but those who were  pure in heart, and the elders were counseled to travel by other means than by  the rivers, that their faith fail not.

 

Object of the Mission to Zion

 

On the 27th day of August Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery and Sidney Rigdon arrived  in Kirtland; others of the elders had previously arrived. Their mission had been  fulfilled. They had gone to Missouri for the purpose of receiving definite  knowledge concerning the location of the land and site for the future city of  Zion; to dedicate the land as the “inheritance of the Saints,” also to choose  and dedicate a spot for the building of the temple. Those who were to remain  were instructed in their duties and given commandments by which they were to be  governed in that land and upon which their inheritances, and those of the Saints  who should follow after, might be made secure.

 

Notes

 

1.  Isaiah 2:1 through 4.

 

 2. Isaiah 60:12 through 22. The following reference to Zion or the New Jerusalem, is  from the prophecy of Ether; Book of Mormon, Ether, 13th chapter:

 

 “Behold, Ether saw the day of Christ, and he spake concerning a New Jerusalem  upon this land. And he spake also concerning the house of Israel, and the  Jerusalem from whence Lehi should come after it should be destroyed it should be  built up again, a holy city unto the Lord; wherefore, it could not be a new  Jerusalem for it had been in a time of old; but it should be built up again,  and become a holy city of the Lord; and it should be built unto the house of  Israel And that a New Jerusalem should be built upon this land, unto the remnant  of the seed of Joseph, for which things there has been a type. For as Joseph  brought his father down into the land of Egypt, even so he died there;  wherefore, the Lord brought a remnant of the seed of Joseph out of the land of  Jerusalem, that he might be merciful unto the seed of Joseph that they should  perish not, even as he was merciful unto the father of Joseph that he should  perish not. Wherefore, the remnant of the house of Joseph shall be built upon  this land; and it shall be a land of their inheritance; and they shall build up  a holy city unto the Lord, like unto the Jerusalem of old; and they shall no  more be confounded, until the end come when the earth shall pass away. And there  shall be a new heaven and a new earth; and they shall be like unto the old save  the old have passed away, and all things have become new. And then cometh the  New Jerusalem; and blessed are they who dwell therein, for it is they whose  garments are white through the blood of the Lamb; and they are they who are  numbered among the remnant of the seed of Joseph, who were of the house of  Israel.”

 

 Chapter 17 The Book of Commandments.  The Vision of the Glories.  The Hiram Mobbing. 1831 through 1832

 

Desire of the Saints for Knowledge of Zion

 

August 28, the day after the return of the brethren from Missouri, fell on  Sunday. An inspirational meeting was held at which the brethren reported their  labors. Among the business transacted was the ordination of Oliver Cowdery to  the office of high priest “by the voice of the Church and the command of God,  under the hand of Sidney Rigdon,” says the record. Oliver Cowdery was in  Missouri when the conference in June was held, at which the first high priests  were ordained.

 

As the Saints were very anxious to know more in relation to Zion, the purchasing  of lands there and their inheritances, the Prophet inquired of the Lord, and  received a revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 63) in which the difficulties and  persecutions of the Saints in that land were fore-shadowed. Again the people  were cautioned and reproved wherein they had not kept the commandments of the  Lord. Among other things the Lord declared the following:

 

 “And now, verily, I say unto you, that as I said that I would make known my will  unto you, behold I will make it known unto you, not by the way of commandment,  for there are many who observe not to keep my commandments; but unto him that  keepeth my commandments, I will give the mysteries of my kingdom, and the same  shall be in him a well of living water, springing up unto everlasting life. And  now, behold, this is the will of the Lord your God concerning his Saints, that  they should assemble themselves together unto the land of Zion, not in haste,  lest there should be confusion, which bringeth pestilence. Behold, the land of  Zion, I, the Lord, holdeth it in mine own hands; nevertheless, I, the Lord,  render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s. Wherefore, I, the Lord, will  that you should purchase the lands that you may have advantage of the world,  that you may have claim on the world, that they may not be stirred up unto  anger; for Satan putteth it into their hearts to anger against you, and to the  shedding of blood. Wherefore the land of Zion shall not be obtained but by  purchase or by blood, otherwise there is none inheritance for you. And if by  purchase, behold you are blessed; and if by blood, as you are forbidden to shed  blood, lo, your enemies are upon you, and ye shall be scourged from city to  city, and from synagogue to synagogue, and but few shall stand to receive an  inheritance. I, the Lord, am angry with the wicked; I am holding my Spirit from  the inhabitants of the earth.”

 

Apostasy of Ezra Booth

 

In September Joseph Smith moved with his family to Hiram, in Portage County,  Ohio, about thirty miles southeast of Kirtland, and commenced living at the home  of John Johnson. About this time Ezra Booth left the Church. He had been  ordained a high priest, and had taken the trip to Missouri, but had been  rebellious. Before coming into the Church he was a Methodist priest; but through  the performance of a miracle he was baptized, and from that time he desired to  make men believe by the performance of miracles, even by smiting them, or with  forcible means. After leaving the Church he wrote a number of articles against  the truth which were afterwards published in an anti-“Mormon” book.

 

Purchase of a Printing Press

 

As Oliver Cowdery and William W. Phelps had been called to print and publish  books and writings for the Church, it was necessary that a printing press be  purchased. William W. Phelps was instructed, therefore, to call at Cincinnati on  his return to Missouri, and purchase a press for this purpose. This press was to  be taken to Independence, where they were to print a monthly paper to be called  the  Evening and Morning Star. This was the first publication in the Church.

 

Revision of the Bible

 

While residing at Hiram, Joseph Smith was engaged in the revision of the Bible,  which work was commenced in Fayette, but had been delayed by command of the Lord  until this time because of other duties Sidney Rigdon, who also had located in  Hiram, continued to write for him. In course of time the Prophet went through  the Bible, topic by topic, revising as he was led by revelation. The work was  never fully completed, for he had intended, while at Nauvoo, a number of years  later, to finish the work, but was cut off by his enemies. Nevertheless, many  plain and precious things were revealed which throw great light upon many  subjects.

 

Special Conference of November

 

As Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer were appointed to go to Missouri to attend to  duties there, which had been assigned to them, a special conference was called  for November 1, 1831, to consider such matters as might need attention before  their departure.

 

Preparation for Publication of Commandments

 

At this special conference, which was held at Hiram, the matter of publishing  the revelations and commandments given through Joseph Smith, was considered.  This was the will of the Lord, for during that conference he gave the  revelation one of the most important in the Doctrine and Covenants which he  called “my preface unto the book of my commandments, which I have given them to  publish unto you, O inhabitants of the earth” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 1). These  inhabitants were commanded, as well as were the Saints, to “search these  commandments, for they are true and faithful, and the prophecies and promises  which are in them shall all be fulfilled.” The Lord was willing, “to make these  things known unto all flesh, for I am no respecter of persons,” he said, “and  will that all men shall know that the day speedily cometh; the hour is not yet,  but is nigh at hand, when peace shall be taken from the earth, and the devil  shall have power over his own dominion; and also the Lord shall have power over  his Saints, and shall reign in their midst, and shall come down in judgment upon  Idumea, or the world.”

 

Endorsement of the Revelations

 

It was decided that an edition of ten thousand copies of the Book of  Commandments should be published. However, at a later date (May 1, 1832) this  was changed to three thousand copies. Joseph Smith addressed the elders and  said, inasmuch as the Lord had bestowed a great blessing upon them in giving  commandments and revelations, he would ask the conference what testimony they  were willing to give regarding these commandments which should shortly be sent  to the world. After the reading of the Lord’s preface, a number of the brethren  arose and bore witness to the truth of the revelations, which were to be  published in the Book of Commandments. The conference lasted two days and much  other business was transacted.

 

Criticism of the Revelations

 

Not all of those present at the conference fully endorsed these revelations;  there was one at least, who questioned their language. This was William E.  McLellin, who had but recently joined the Church. The Prophet thereupon received  a commandment from the Lord (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 67) in which he was directed to  invite the “most wise among you” to choose out of the revelations the least, and  attempt to make one like unto it; and if this “wise” individual could duplicate  the least of the revelations, then the elders might be justified in saying they  did not “know that they are true.” If this proved to be a failure, then they  would be “under condemnation” if they did not bear record that they are true.

 

William E. McLellin’s Folly

 

William E. McLellin, as the wisest man, accepted the challenge from the Lord.  His attempt was a humiliating failure, to the convincing of the elders present,  who unitedly signified their willingness to bear testimony to all the world, of  the truth of the revelations given to Joseph Smith.

 

Other Important Revelations

 

At the conclusion of this conference the Lord gave another commandment (Doc. and  Cov. Sec. 68) for the benefit of Orson Hyde, Luke Johnson, Lyman E. Johnson and  William E. McLellin, who had inquired concerning themselves. In addition to the  advice and commandments given to these men there was much counsel and  commandment for the inhabitants in Zion, for there were idlers among them, the  Lord declared, and they were to keep the Sabbath day, to remember their prayers,  to teach their children the principles of the Gospel and have them baptized when  eight years old, for these things they were failing to do; therefore the Lord  was not pleased with them. Instructions were also given regarding the  Priesthood and its powers, for the guidance of the Church. This information  Oliver Cowdery was to carry on his return to Zion.

 

On the 3rd of November, the Lord gave the great revelation known as the  Appendix, to the Book of Commandments, which appears as Section 133 in the book  of Doctrine and Covenants.

 

Arrangement of the Revelations

 

It was decided that Oliver Cowdery should carry the revelations to Missouri,  where they should be printed. Joseph Smith was therefore kept busy during the  days intervening, as Oliver expected to leave about the 15th of November. The  Prophet writes: “My time was occupied closely in reviewing the commandments and  sitting in conference, for nearly two weeks; for from the first to the twelfth  of November, we held four special conferences.”

 

Worth of the Revelations

 

At the last of these conferences, held in Hiram, at the home of John Johnson,  the members voted, after deliberate consideration of the revelations, “that they  prize the revelations to be worth to the Church the riches of the whole earth,  speaking temporally.” The benefits to the Church and to the world, which come  from the Book of Mormon and the revelations to Joseph Smith, were also  considered, and the expression of the conference was to the effect that the  infinite wisdom of the Lord, in granting for their salvation and the salvation  of the world, these sacred things, should be fully appreciated.

 

Commandments Dedicated

 

It was voted that Joseph Smith be appointed to dedicate and consecrate these  brethren, Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer, and the sacred writings entrusted to  their care, to the Lord. Moreover, it was also voted that, in consequence of the  diligence of Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, John Whitmer and Sidney Rigdon, “in  bringing to light, by the grace of God, these sacred things, they be appointed  to manage them according to the laws of the Church, and that their families as  well as the families of Hyrum Smith, Christian Whitmer, Peter Whitmer, Jacob  Whitmer, Hiram Page and David Whitmer, also Samuel Smith, William Smith and Don  Carlos Smith, be remembered to the bishop of Zion as worthy of inheritances in  the land of Zion.” In accord with this motion regarding the dedication of the  revelations and those who should carry them, this action was taken at this time  by Joseph Smith. Shortly after this conference, Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer  departed on their journey.

 

Labors Among the Enemy

 

On the 1st of December, Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon were commanded to take “a  mission for a season” and call upon the inhabitants of the earth, and, said the  Lord, “confound your enemies; call upon them to meet you, both in public and in  private; and inasmuch as ye are faithful, their shame shall be made manifest.  Wherefore let them bring forth their strong reason against the Lord.” The reason  for this commandment was due to the activities of the apostate Ezra Booth, who  was publishing in Ravenna, Ohio, many falsehoods against the Church. According  to this call Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon left on the 3rd of December for  Kirtland, to fulfil this revelation. For some time they spoke in Kirtland,  Shalersville, Ravenna, and other places, vindicating the cause and confounding  their enemies. They were blessed with the Spirit of the Lord, and witnessed the  fulfilment of the promises made to them; for they were able to allay much of the  excitement and change false impressions which had grown out of scandalous  articles in the “Ohio Star” at Ravenna.

 

The Amherst Conference

 

On the 15th day of January, 1832, a conference was held at Amherst, Loraine  County, Ohio. At this conference much business was transacted in harmony and in  the spirit of fellowship. Joseph Smith was sustained as President of the High  Priesthood. The revelation known as Section 75 in the Doctrine and Covenants was  also given in which a number of elders were called to take missions, two by two,  in several directions throughout the land.

 

The Vision of the Glories

 

At the close of this conference, Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon again took up  their work of revising the scriptures. While doing so, “it appeared  self-evident,” they declared, “from what truths were left, that if God rewarded  every one according to the deeds done in the body, the term ‘Heaven’ is intended  for the Saints’ eternal home, must include more kingdoms than one.” Accordingly  on the 16th of February, 1832, while revising St. John’s Gospel, and in answer  to their prayer, they saw the heavens opened and beheld the Father and the Son.  The account of this vision, as it is given in Section 76 of the Doctrine and  Covenants, is one of the choicest bits of literature, and one of the greatest  revelations ever given to man. It throws a flood of light upon eternity and the  destiny of the human race and teaches the mercy of a loving Father, who saves  all the workmanship of his hands, save it be the sons of perdition, who sin  against the light and crucify their Redeemer again unto themselves. That every  man shall be rewarded according to his works, and that a place has been prepared  for each individual somewhere in the mansion of the Father, after he is purged  from sin, is a glorious and merciful provision in the plan of salvation, which  this vision declares, as it was provided before the world began. It would be  folly to attempt to comment on this most wonderful revelation of the power and  loving kindness of the Lord, which the words of man cannot adequately express.

 

The Prophet’s Views on the Vision

 

The words of Joseph Smith pertaining to this opening of the heavens, are well  expressed. “Nothing,” he has written, “could be more pleasing to the Saints upon  the order of the kingdom of the Lord, than the light which burst upon the world  through the foregoing vision. Every law, every commandment, every promise, every  truth, and every point touching the destiny of man, from Genesis to Revelation,  where the purity of the scriptures remains unsullied by the folly of men, go to  show the perfection of the theory [of different degrees of glory in the future  life] and witness the fact that that document is a transcript from the records  of the eternal world. The sublimity of the ideas; the purity of the language;  the scope for action; the continued duration for completion, in order that the  heirs of salvation may confess the Lord and bow the knee; the rewards for  faithfulness, and the punishments for sins, are so much beyond the  narrow-mindedness of men, that every honest man is constrained to exclaim: “It  came from God!” Joseph Smith or any other man guided by the inspiration of man’s  power could not have written it.

 

Mob Violence in Hiram

 

Before going to Hiram, Ohio, to live, Joseph Smith and his wife adopted two  children (twins) of Elder John Murdock’s. Their mother died at their birth, and  Emma Smith, having lost twins of her own which were born the same day, took the  Murdock twins to raise. In March, 1832, when these children were about eleven  months old, they took the measles, and their care caused both the Prophet and  his wife to lose much rest. On the night of the 24th, after the family had  retired, a mob surrounded the house, broke open the door and dragged the Prophet  into the open. On the way he managed to get one foot loose with which he kicked  one of the ruffians and knocked him down. At this, with blasphemous oath, the  fiends swore they would kill the Prophet if he made further resistance. They  then choked him until he was unconscious. When he came too, he discovered Sidney  Rigdon, whom they had also taken from his home and dragged by his heels so that  his head struck at every step on the frozen earth. He was unconscious on the  ground. About sixty rods from the house the mob held a council to decide what  further action they might take. Some were ready to kill the Prophet, but  returning to him they attempted to force a vial of acid in his mouth, but the  vial was broken against his teeth. An attempt was also made to fill his mouth  with tar; failing in this they tore from him his clothes, and applied the tar  with feathers to his body. After shamefully beating him they left him helpless  on the ground. Joseph attempted to rise, but fell to the ground again. After a  while he began to recover his strength, and made his way with difficulty to his  home.

 

Sidney received similar treatment, which left him delirious for several days.  The Prophet’s friends spent the night cleaning the tar from his body, and the  following day, it being the Sabbath, he met with the people at the regular hour,  and addressed them. Several of the members of the mob were present, including  Simonds Ryder, an apostate, and leader of the mob; a Mr. McClentic and Felatiah  Allen, who had provided the mob with a barrel of whisky to raise their spirits  and make them “brave” to do the deed. During the mobbing one of the twins became  exposed, contracted a severe cold, and a few days later, died.

 

Second Visit to Missouri

 

The first of April, Joseph Smith, with Newel K. Whitney and Jesse Gause, left  for Missouri to fulfil the provisions of a revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 78) in  respect to regulating and establishing the affairs of the store house for the  poor, and the consecration of properties. They were later joined by Sidney  Rigdon. On the way they purchased paper, at Wheeling, Virginia, for the press in  Zion, and arrived in Independence on the 24th of April. Two days later at a  general council of the Church, Joseph Smith was acknowledged by the Saints in  Zion as President of the High Priesthood, ratifying the action of the Amherst  conference, held January 25, 1832.

 

Zion and Her Stakes

 

During this conference a revelation was given commanding the elders to bind  themselves in a covenant of consecration, which could not be broken. Kirtland  was to become a “stake of Zion.”1 “For I have consecrated the land of Shinehah  (Kirtland), in mine own due time,” said the Lord, “for the benefit of the Saints  of the Most High, and for a stake of Zion. For Zion must increase in beauty, and  in holiness; her borders must be enlarged; her stakes must be strengthened; yea,  verily I say unto you, Zion must arise and put on her beautiful garments.  Therefore I give unto you this commandment, that ye bind yourselves by this  covenant, and it shall be done according to the laws of the Lord.”

 

Return to Kirtland

 

Joseph and the brethren visited the Colesville Saints in Kaw township, who  rejoiced greatly to see them. It was agreed in a council held on the first of  May to print but three thousand copies of the Book of Commandments, and that the  revelations should be reviewed and prepared by Oliver Cowdery, William W. Phelps  and John Whitmer; and that the hymns selected by Emma Smith be prepared for  printing. After the transaction of other necessary business, Joseph Smith and  his companions, Rigdon and Whitney, returned to Kirtland. On this journey Joseph  was poisoned and Bishop Whitney met with an accident breaking his leg and foot  in several places; both were healed by the power of the Lord.

 

Notes

 

 1. The term “Stake of Zion,” which was first used in a revelation given in  November, 1831 (Sec. 68) is a comparison to the stakes which bind a tent. Isaiah  says: “Look upon Zion, the city of our solemnities; thine eyes shall see  Jerusalem a quiet habitation, a tabernacle that shall not be taken down; not one  of the stakes thereof shall ever be removed, neither shall any of the cords  thereof be broken” (Ch. 33:20). Again: “Enlarge the place of thy tent and let  them stretch forth the curtains” of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy  cords, and strengthen thy stakes.” (Ch. 54:2)

 

Zion is the tent, the settlements surrounding her, are the cords and stakes. It  is as improper to speak of Zion in Missouri as the “center stake of Zion,” as it  would be to call a tent a stake.

 

 Chapter 18  Organization of the First Presidency Important Revelations. 1832 through 1833

 

Important Revelations

 

In the fall of 1832 and continuing through the winter and spring of 1833, a  number of remarkable revelations were given for the edification and guidance of  the Church. Great principles of science and philosophy, as well as of doctrine  and spiritual truth, were revealed.

 

On the 22nd and 23rd of September, at the inquiry of a number of elders of the  Church, the history and power of the Priesthood were revealed (Doc. and Cov.  Sec. 84); the responsibilities taken by those who are ordained, were explained;  the promises made to those who are faithful that they shall receive the fulness  of the blessings of the father’s kingdom for he had declared it “with an oath  and covenant, which belongeth to the Priesthood,” with the penalty attached that  “whoso breaketh this covenant . . . and altogether turneth therefrom, shall not  have forgiveness of sins in this world, nor in the word to come”  were clearly  defined; the place of the great temple, and when it shall be built, and many  other things dealing with the gathering of the Saints, the building of Zion and  its redemption, were set forth.

 

November 27 the Lord stated that he would send one mighty and strong to arrange  the inheritances of the Saints in Zion (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 85). December 6, the  parable of the wheat and the tares was explained (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 86). On  Christmas day the prophecy on war, which has so far been fulfilled, was given  (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 87). Two days later the remarkable revelation on scientific  and doctrinal truth, known as the “Olive Leaf” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 88), was  presented to the Church. In this wonderful communication from the heavens, the  following eternal principles, among many others, were revealed:

 

The light of Christ is the light of truth and is the light of the sun, the  planets, the stars, and the power by which they were made; it is the light which  quickeneth the intelligence of man; it is the life and light of all things, and  is the law by which they are governed; it fills the immensity of space; to every  kingdom there is given laws which have their bounds and conditions; there is no  space in which there is no kingdom, great or small; the worlds in space are  peopled with the children of our Father; the earth on which we dwell is a living  body and shall die, but shall be raised again a celestial body and shall become  the abode of celestial beings; the inhabitants of the earth who are unfaithful  must inherit another kingdom in eternity; he who cannot abide the law of the  celestial kingdom, cannot abide a celestial glory; every man in the resurrection  is quickened by the glory of the kingdom to which he has attained: the spirit  and the body is the soul of man, and the redemption of the soul is through the  death and resurrection of Jesus Christ; after the testimonies of the elders will  come the testimonies of judgments; the order of the signs preceding the coming  of the Savior, are made known; the redemption of the just; the destruction of  the “great and abominable church;” and the fate of the wicked, are declared  among the great truths contained in this revelation.

 

In February, 1833, the Lord gave to Joseph Smith the “Word of Wisdom” (Doc. and  Cov. Sec. 89), for the temporal salvation of mankind. March 15, 1833, the  doctrines of the eternity of matter; the glory of God is Intelligence; the  innocence of man in the beginning; and many other things were received (Doc. and  Cov. Sec. 93).

 

The School of the Prophets

 

In the revelation of December 27, 1833 (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 88), the elders of  the Church were also commanded to “teach one another the doctrines of the  kingdom.” They were to be instructed “more perfectly in theory, in principle, in  doctrine, in the law of the Gospel, in all things that pertain unto the kingdom  of God,” that were expedient for them to understand. They were to tarry in  Kirtland for this instruction, before they should “go forth, among the Gentiles  for the last time, as many as the mouth of the Lord shall name, to bind up the  law and seal up the testimony, and to prepare the Saints for the hour of  judgment which is to come.” They were to seek diligently out of the best books,  words of wisdom and learning “even by study and also by faith.” That this  should be accomplished, they were to prepare a house of prayer, learning and  faith, even a house of glory a house of God. In it they were to call their  solemn assemblies; one should be appointed as teacher, and not all speak at  once. While one speaks, all others should give attention. In this manner there  was to be perfect order in the School of the Prophets  for so it should be  called. Moreover, the Lord declared: “And this shall be the order of the house  of the presidency of the school: He that is appointed to be president, or  teacher, shall be found standing in his place, in the house which shall be  prepared for him. Therefore, he shall be first in the house of God, in a place  that the congregation in the house may hear his words carefully and distinctly,  not with loud speech.” Those who were entitled to attend should be the officers  of the Church who are called to the ministry, “beginning at the high priests,  even down to the deacons.” They were to greet each other in fellowship, with  proper salutations. They should be men who were clean from the blood of this  generation, sober-minded and full of faith. Further, the Lord stated: “And ye  are called to do this by prayer and thanksgiving as the Spirit shall give  utterance in all your doings in the house of the Lord, in the School of the  Prophets, that it may become a sanctuary, a tabernacle of the Holy Spirit to  your edification.”

 

The Coming of Brigham Young and Others

 

September 10, George Albert Smith, son of John Smith and cousin to the Prophet,  was baptized in Potsdam, New York. He was a youth fifteen years of age, who in  later years was to play an important part in the work of these latter days.  About the 8th of November, Joseph Young, Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball and  John P. Greene, came from Mendon, Monroe County, New York. This was the first  meeting of Joseph Smith and these brethren. They remained in Kirtland for a  number of days and were privileged to meet with the Prophet on several  occasions. In one of their meetings, Brigham Young and John P. Greene spoke in  tongues, as did also the Prophet Joseph Smith. These brethren had received the  Gospel in Mendon. It had first been brought to their attention in the summer or  fall of 1831, through the labors of Samuel H. Smith, who had left a copy of the  Book of Mormon with John P. Greene. Later, through the preaching of Elders  Alpheus Gifford, Elial Strong and others they were persuaded to receive the  truth. Brigham Young was baptized by Elder Eleazer Miller, April 14, 1832; was  ordained an elder and at once entered the ministry and assisted in raising up  several branches in the vicinity of Mendon, New York.

 

The Prophet’s Labors in Kirtland

 

The winter of 1832 through 3 was spent by Joseph Smith in revision of the scriptures; in  the School of the Prophets, which had just been organized by commandment (Doc.  and Cov. Sec. 88); and in the holding of conferences from time to time. In  January a number of meetings of the elders were held, in which the ordinances of  washing of feet, as spoken of in the 13th chapter of John, was attended to, as  commanded by the Lord (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 88). On the 2nd of February the  Prophet finished the revision of the New Testament, as far as he was directed to  revise it at that time, and sealed it up not to be opened until it arrived in  Zion. Several epistles were written to the Saints, and much correspondence  passed between the elders in Zion and those in Kirtland in relation to their  work.

 

Organization of the First Presidency

 

March 18, 1833, the First Presidency of the Church was organized, with Joseph  Smith, president, and Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G. Williams, counselors. This  was in fulfilment of the commandment given in a revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec.  90) on the 8th of that month, wherein the Lord said to Joseph Smith: “And again,  verily I say unto thy brethren, Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G. Williams, their  sins are forgiven them also, and they are accounted as equal with thee in  holding the keys of the kingdom.” One year before, in March, 1832, the Lord had  called Frederick G. Williams to this position by revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec.  81), and to hold “the keys of the kingdom, which belongeth always unto the  Presidency of the High Priesthood.” Joseph Smith laid his hands on the heads of  each of these men and ordained them to take part with him in this great  responsibility. Thus another step in the organization of the Church was  completed.

 

Kirtland a Stake of Zion

 

March 23, 1833, a council of the elders was called for the purpose of appointing  a committee to purchase lands in Kirtland, upon which the Saints might build a  stake of Zion. After some deliberations a committee was appointed consisting of  Ezra Thayer and Joseph Coe. Later the property was purchased for this purpose,  and many of the elders commenced to labor in various ways for the building of a  city for the Saints at Kirtland.

 

First Gathering of the Mob in Zion

 

In April, 1833, the first gathering of the mob in Jackson County took place.  About three hundred men came together to decide upon a plan of campaign for the  removal of the members of the Church in Jackson County. At the same time the  elders in Jackson County met in solemn prayer and petitioned the Lord that the  efforts of their enemies might fail. They had reason to meet and pray, for the  wickedness of their enemies was extreme. Nor were the Saints free from guilt  before the Lord. They had failed to keep strictly the commandments of the Lord  which had been given them for the building up of Zion. Jealousies had arisen and  murmurings were heard; even the Prophet, as well as others of the leading  brethren, had been criticized. Some of the members had failed to observe the  law of consecration, which had been given for the building of Zion, and their  humility, in some respects, had been forgotten. However, on this occasion the  deliberations of their enemies came to nothing. The Lord had heard the prayers  of the Saints.

 

A House of the Lord in Kirtland

 

At a conference of high priests held May 4, 1833, a committee was appointed to  obtain subscriptions for the building of a house for a school, in compliance  with the revelations of December 27, 1832, and March 8, 1833, where the elders  might receive instructions before going out to warn the world. Hyrum Smith,  Jared Carter and Reynolds Cahoon, were appointed as that committee. May 6,  Joseph Smith received another revelation in which the Church was commanded to  “commence a work of laying out and preparing a beginning and foundation of a  stake of Zion,” in Kirtland. A house was also to be built for the work of  printing, translating, and “all things whatsoever the Lord should command them.”  The committee immediately went to work to gather means by subscriptions for this  purpose. They had previously been commanded to build a house unto the Lord, to  be a house of prayer and fasting, to be a temple unto His name.

 

Commencement of the Kirtland Temple

 

By the first of June the preparations for the building of the Kirtland Temple  were under way. A circular letter was sent out by the building committee to the  various branches of the Church. June 1, the Prophet received the word of the  Lord, in relation to the building of the temple, in which the Saints were  commanded to hasten the work, and the necessity for such a building was made  known. “Ye have sinned against me a very grievous sin, in that ye have not  considered the great commandment in all things, that I have given unto you  concerning the building of mine house,” said the Lord. Then He states the  reason, in part for the full purpose for such a house was not at that time made  known to be as follows: “For the preparation wherewith I design to prepare mine  apostles to prune my vineyard for the last time, that I may bring to pass my  strange act, that I may pour out my Spirit upon all flesh. . .  . Yea, verily I  say unto you, I give you a commandment that you should build an house, in the  which I design to endow those whom I have chosen, with power from on high. For  this is the promise of the Father unto you, therefore I command you to tarry,  even as mine apostles at Jerusalem.”

 

From this it is discovered that there were certain endowments and blessings to  be given to the elders, before they could go forth fully prepared to preach the  Gospel in the world, which could only be obtained in the temple of the Lord. For  this cause the Lord commanded that the temple be built at once, for the  preaching of the Gospel was urgent, and the laborers were few. The Saints  therefore, went to work diligently in the midst of many difficulties, both  within, as well as without, the Church, to build the house of the Lord.

 

The First Work on the Temple

 

On the 5th of June, George A. Smith hauled the first load of stone, and Hyrum  Smith and Reynolds Cahoon, two of the building committee, commenced to dig the  trench for the foundation, which they later finished with their own hands.  Others also volunteered, and by these means the work progressed.

 

The Case of “Doctor” Hurlbut

 

On the 3rd of June a charge was preferred against Philastus Hurlbut, who was  accused of unchristian conduct while on a mission to the east. On investigation  his elder’s licence was taken from him. On the 21st he appealed his case and on  making confession of his improper conduct and a seeming show of repentance, he  was reinstated. Two days later, however, his sincerity was called in question,  and on the testimony of witnesses who had heard him say that he had not repented  and had deceived “Joseph Smith’s God,” he was excommunicated from the Church. He  later manifested a bitter spirit and in April, 1834, was bound by the court to  keep the peace, “with good and sufficient security in the sum of two hundred  dollars,” for threats against the life of Joseph Smith.1

 

Notes

 

 1. Any reference to “Dr.” Hurlbut might be considered insignificant but for one  thing which developed after his apostasy and excommunication, which may be  mentioned briefly here. He was not a doctor, but was so called because he was  the seventh son. He had been a Methodist, but had been expelled from that body  for immoral conduct, before he joined the Church. While engaged in missionary  work in Pennsylvania he heard of a manuscript that had been written by one  Solomon Spaulding, which dealt with the subject of the American Indian. Hurlbut  had an evil thought. If he could make it appear that the Book of Mormon was  taken, or plagiarized, from the Spaulding Manuscript, it would prove to be an  irreparable injury to “Mormonism.” Others became interested in the scheme and a  book was produced by E. D. Howe, entitled Mormonism Unveiled. Of course the  Spaulding story was lost so that no comparison was possible. For many years the  publication of E.  D. Howe was made to do mighty service against the Book of  Mormon. As time went on, however, the manuscript of Mr. Spaulding was found,  and, is now in the archives of Oberlin College, in Ohio. A comparison with the  Book of Mormon proved that the two productions were no more alike than the  Bible is like the story of Gulliver’s Travels. Since that day the Hurlbut-Howe  theory of the origin of the Book of Mormon has been dead.

 

For a thorough account of this question the reader is referred to The Myth of  the Manuscript Found, by Elder George Reynolds; and New Witness for God, vol. 3,  page 354, by Elder B. H. Roberts.

 

 Chapter 19 Expulsion from Jackson County. 1833

 

The Prophet’s Warning

 

The impending storm about to break over the heads of the Saints in Missouri was  foreseen by the Prophet Joseph Smith. In January, 1833, he wrote to William W.  Phelps as follows: “The Lord will have a place whence his word will go forth in  these last days in purity; for if Zion will not purify herself so as to be  approved of in all things in his sight, he will seek another people; for his  work will go on until Israel is gathered, and they who will not hear his voice  must expect to feel his wrath. . . . Our hearts are greatly grieved at the  spirit which is breathed both in your letter and that of Brother Gilbert’s, the  very spirit which is wasting the strength of Zion like a pestilence; and if it  is not detected and driven from you, it will ripen Zion for the threatened  judgments of God. . . . This from your brother who trembles for Zion, and for  the wrath of heaven, which awaits her if she repent not.” These fears were also  expressed in an epistle written the same day from a conference of high priests  in Kirtland to their brethren in Zion. “We feel more like weeping for Zion than  we do like rejoicing over her, for we know that the judgments of God hang over  her, and will fall upon her except she repent,” was their message.

 

Rise of Mob Force in Jackson

 

Almost as soon as the members of the Church commenced settling in Jackson  County, opposition began to show itself. The settlers were incited to violence  by their ministers, who started a campaign of abuse and falsehood. They received  ready aid from others of the citizens, which ultimately resulted in the  expulsion of the Latter-day Saints from the state. The Rev. Finis Ewing publicly  distributed the report that “the ‘Mormons’ were the common enemies of mankind,”  while the Rev. Pixley circulated falsehoods among the religious papers of the  east, and used his influence among both the Indians and the whites for the  destruction of the Church in Jackson County.

 

Nearly all the Latter-day Saints were from the Eastern States, while the  Missourians were from the South. The Missourians feared that the “Mormons” would  increase and take from them their political domination. The question of slavery,  even in that day, was quite keen, and the Missourians were determined to keep  the state within the control of the slave holders. Above all else, however, was  their extreme hatred for the “Mormons” because of their industry and belief.  Some of the latter had also failed to show the proper discretion and wisdom, for  they openly stated that the Lord had given them the land for their eternal  inheritance, and although they were to purchase the lands, yet in time there  the city Zion would be built, unto which none but the faithful would be  privileged to come. Such expressions aroused the Missourians to fever heat, for  they naturally hated the doctrines of the Church, and to be informed that the  lands would ultimately be taken from them, was adding fuel to the flame.

 

As early as the spring of 1832, the mob resorted to violence. In the still hours  of the night, windows in many of the houses of the Saints were broken, and other  damage done by their enemies, who naturally performed their deeds in the dark;  but this was only the beginning of sorrow.

 

The Mob Council

 

July 20, 1833, a council of all Missourians who were opposed to the Latter-day  Saints was called to meet in the Independence Court house. Between four and five  hundred men assembled and chose Richard Simpson, chairman, and Samuel D. Lucas  and J. H. Flournoy, secretaries. They then proceeded to discuss means for the  ejection of the members of the Church from Jackson County, “peaceably if we  can,” they said, “forcibly if we must.” After deliberating for some time, they  concluded that “the arm of the civil law does not afford a guarantee,” or at  least a sufficient one, against the “evils” which were inflicted upon them.  These “evils” were such that “no one could have foreseen,” and “therefore,  unprovided for by the laws;” and the “delays incident to legislation would put  the mischief beyond remedy.” They must because of this take into their own hands  the matter of expulsion of hundreds of citizens from their homes.

 

Some of the “evils” of the “Mormons” were stated to be as follows: The  declaration that miracles have been performed and supernatural cures achieved  among the sick; a belief in heavenly manifestations and that they have held  converse with God and his angels; possession and exercise of the gifts of  divination and unknown tongues; and “fired with the prospect of obtaining  inheritance without money and without price.” Yet they were well aware that the  “Mormons” had never made the attempt to obtain lands except by purchase, as the  Lord had commanded them. Nevertheless all these “crimes” must be punished; for  against such evils “self preservation, good society and public morals,” made  demands that the “Mormons” should be expelled. The following articles were drawn  up and unanimously approved, to be submitted to the elders of the Church.

 

Declaration of the Mob

 

(1). “That no Mormon shall in future move and settle in this county.

 

(2). “That those now here, who shall give a definite pledge of their intention  within reasonable time to remove out of the county, shall be allowed to remain  unmolested until they have sufficient time to sell their property, and close  their business, without any material sacrifice.

 

(3). “That the editor of the Star  be required forthwith to close his office and  discontinue the business of printing in this county; and as to all other stores  and shops belonging to the sect, their owners must in every case strictly comply  with the terms of the second article of this declaration; and upon failure,  prompt and efficient measures will be taken to close the same.

 

(4). “That the Mormon leaders here are required to use their influence in  preventing any further emigration of their distant brethren to this county, and  to counsel and advise their brethren here to comply with the above requisitions.

 

(5). “That those who fail to comply with these requisitions be referred to those  of their brethren who have the gifts of divination, and of unknown tongues, to  inform them of the lot that awaits them.”

 

This address was read and after approval a committee consisting of twelve men  was appointed to wait upon the presiding elders of the Church. They were  instructed to “see that the foregoing requisitions are strictly complied with by  them; and upon their refusal, that said committee do, as the organ of this  county, inform them that it is our unwavering purpose and fixed determination,  after the fullest consideration of all the consequences and responsibilities  under which we act, to use such means as shall insure full and complete  adoption.” Such was the ungodly manifesto of the mob.

 

The Enemy’s Demands

 

A recess was taken for two hours in which the committee was to carry this  message of unrighteous demands to the elders of the Church, and then make  report. Naturally these brethren desired time to consider these drastic terms.  They had come into the land by command of the Lord, to receive their  inheritance; it was here the great city of the New Jerusalem was to be built;  they had hoped for a peaceful possession of their property, and as they had not  interfered with the privileges of others they justly felt that they were  entitled to maintain their rights. They asked for three months for consideration  of these evil terms; but were denied. They then asked for ten days; but were  informed that fifteen minutes was time enough. If immediate answer was not  forthcoming an unfavorable report would be returned, with consequences of  serious character speedily to follow. A refusal of these demands was evidently  the desire of the unlawful gathering at the court house, which sought a pretext  to vent their anger upon the Saints violently.

 

The Committee’s Report

 

The committee returned and made their report. “Whereupon,” their minutes read,  “it was unanimously resolved by the meeting, that the Star printing office  should be razed to the ground; the type and press secured.” With the  understanding that they would meet again three days later, the horde of wretches  started forth on their mission of destruction. They did not overlook the  opportunity to advertise their deliberations “that the Mormon brethren may know  at a distance that the gates of Zion are closed against them  that their  interests will be best promoted by remaining among those who know and appreciate  their merits.”

 

Vengeance of the Mob

 

With the utmost fury these human fiends proceeded to the office of the Evening  and Morning Star and razed it to the ground. The office was a part of the  dwelling occupied by William W. Phelps. Mrs. Phelps and her children, including  a sick infant, were thrown out of doors amidst the furniture which was  destroyed. They then proceeded to the store of Gilbert, Whitney and Co., bent on  further destruction; but Elder Gilbert assuring them that the goods would be  packed by the 23rd of that month, and no more would be sold, they left him and  the store and turned their attention to personal violence. They took Bishop  Edward Partridge and Charles Allen, stripped them and applied a coat of tar  which had been mixed with acid which burned into their flesh, and then coated  them with feathers. Others of the brethren were scourged, amidst horrid yells  and blasphemous oaths, while others in the excitement, for all their captors  were intent upon the “sport,” were able to make their escape from similar  treatment by the mob.

 

Second Gathering of the Mob

 

On the morning of July 23, 1833, the mob, to the number of about five hundred,  again approached Independence, carrying a red flag  the emblem of  lawlessness and armed with all manner of weapons of war. They rode through the  streets, giving vent to hideous yells and blasphemous oaths, searching for the  presiding elders of the Church. They threatened to whip any “Mormon” whom they  captured, with from fifty to five hundred lashes each, demolish their dwellings,  and turn negroes loose to destroy their fields.

 

Offer of Ransom for the Church

 

Elders John Corrill, John Whitmer, William W. Phelps, Algernon S. Gilbert,  Edward Partridge and Isaac Morley, the leading elders, made no resistance, but  offered themselves a ransom for the Church. They were willing to be scourged and  even die, if that would appease the wrath of the mob. The Missourians, with  blasphemous oaths, assured them that every man, woman and child would be whipped  and scourged even to death if they did not leave Jackson County. “The Mormons,”  said the mobbers, “must leave the county, or they or the Mormons must die.” The  brethren mentioned, knowing that resistance was useless and to save the Saints  and avoid the shedding of blood, entered into an agreement with the mob to leave  the county within a reasonable time.

 

The Forced Agreement of the Mob

 

The terms forced by the mob upon the Saints were as follows: Oliver Cowdery,  William W. Phelps, William E. McLellin, Edward Partridge, Lyman Wight, Simeon  Carter, Harvey Whitlock and the two Whitmers, Peter and John, were to remove  their families from the county on or before the first day of January, 1834; they  were to use all their influence to induce all other members of the Church to  remove as soon as possible, one half by January first, and the rest by the first  of April following; and to do all in their power to stop others of their  brethren from moving into Jackson County; John Corrill and Algernon S. Gilbert  were allowed to remain as general agents to wind up the business, Gilbert to  sell the merchandise on hand but to buy no more; the  Star was not to be  published nor a press set up; Edward Partridge and William W. Phelps were to  remove their families, but they would be permitted to come and go to wind up the  affairs of the Church. The mob pledged themselves to use no violence so long as  the brethren complied with the terms presented. To this the names of the elders  and the members of the second committee appointed by the mob were subscribed.

 

The Contract Broken by the Mob

 

Since there is no honor among knaves, the mob failed to keep their agreement.  Constantly they sallied forth, breaking windows in the homes of the members of  the Church and offering abuse when occasion afforded. These attacks, however,  did not pass unnoticed by the better class of citizens in the state. The Western  Monitor , a paper published in Fayette, Missouri, first showed a friendly spirit  toward the mob, but later censured them for their conduct and advised the  “Mormons” to seek redress for their wrongs. Other papers adopted a similar view,  whereupon the members of the mob declared that if any “Mormon” attempted “to  seek redress by law or otherwise, for character, person, or property, they  should die.”

 

Appeal to Governor Dunklin

 

When hostilities broke out the brethren in Missouri sent Oliver Cowdery to  Kirtland to make report and consult the First Presidency in respect to future  action. In sorrow for the afflicted members in Missouri the presidency sent  Orson Hyde and John Gould with instructions for their brethren in that land.  Shortly after their arrival, necessary preparations having been made, Elders  William W. Phelps and Orson Hyde, were sent to Jefferson City with a petition,  under date of September 28, 1833, to Governor Daniel Dunklin. In their petition  the wrongs of the Latter-day Saints were clearly set forth, and it was signed by  nearly all the members of the Church in Missouri.

 

The Governor’s Reply

 

On the 19th of October, Governor Dunklin made reply to the memorial of the  members of the Church and advised them to take their grievances before the  courts, for, said he: “No citizen, nor number of citizens, have a right to take  the redress of their grievances, whether real or imaginary, into their own  hands. Such conduct strikes at the very existence of society, and subverts the  foundation on which it is based.  . . . The judge of your circuit is a  conservator of the peace: if an affidavit is made before him by any of you, that  your lives are threatened, and you believe them in danger, it would be his duty  to have the offenders apprehended, and bind them to keep the peace.” He could  not “permit himself to doubt that the courts were open to” the Saints.

 

Futility of the Advice

 

Under ordinary circumstances the governor’s advice might have been of some  worth. The conditions, however, were of no ordinary nature. The leaders of the  mob were Samuel D. Lucas, judge of the county court; Samuel C. Owens, county  clerk; John Smith, justice of the peace; Samuel Weston, justice of the peace;  William Brown, constable; Thomas Pitcher, deputy constable; James H. Flournoy,  postmaster, and Lilburn W. Boggs, lieutenant governor of the state, the latter,  however, keeping in the background and aiding and abetting the others in their  evil work. For the “Mormon” people to accept the governor’s advice, would mean  their trial would be conducted before their avowed and open enemies, if they  were permitted a trial at all.

 

Counsel Employed by the Saints

 

Nevertheless, accepting the governor’s advice, attorneys were engaged to fight  the case. They were William T. Wood, Amos Reese, Alexander W. Doniphan and David  R. Atchison, who agreed to plant suits and carry them through for one thousand  dollars. Notes for that amount were given by William W. Phelps and Bishop  Partridge and endorsed by Gilbert, Whitney and Co. However, very little benefit  was ever derived by the members of the Church, from this action.

 

Continued Activities of the Mob

 

As soon as it was known that the “Mormons” would appeal to the courts, the  mobbers began to prepare for war. On the night of October 31, a band of about  fifty marauders proceeded against a branch of the Church west of the Big Blue  River, not far from Independence. There they unroofed and partly demolished a  number of houses, whipped in a savage manner several men and frightened the  women and children, who were forced to flee for safety. On the first of  November, another attack was made on a branch on the prairie, fourteen miles  from Independence. The same night another party raided the homes of the Saints  in Independence, where a number of houses were demolished and the goods in the  store of Gilbert, Whitney and Co., were scattered in the street. One Richard  McCarty was caught in the act of breaking into the store and demolishing  property and was taken before Samuel Weston, justice of the peace, where a  complaint was made against him; Judge Weston, however, refused to consider the  complaint, and turned McCarty loose. The next day McCarty caused the arrest of  the witnesses who had captured him in this unlawful act, and had them tried for  false imprisonment. The same justice, on the testimony of this fellow alone,  found the witnesses, Gilbert, Morley and Corrill, guilty and committed them to  jail. “Although we could not obtain a warrant against him for breaking open the  store,” said John Corrill, “yet he had gotten one for us for catching him at  it.”

 

The Battle of the Blue

 

These attacks upon the Saints were repeatedly continued; attempts were made to  obtain peace warrants, but no justice would issue them for fear of the mob.  Monday, November 4, 1833, a band of mobbers gathered at the Big Blue River and  commenced to destroy property. Nineteen men, members of the Church, gathered in  defense, but discovering the superior number of the mob, turned back. Their  enemies, learning of this attempt, immediately went in pursuit of the “Mormons”  who fled in various directions for safety. About thirty more of the brethren  from the prairie armed with seventeen guns approached and a battle commenced.  The mobbers soon fled leaving two of their number, Hugh L. Brazeale and Thomas  Linville, dead on the ground. Among the “Mormons” Andrew Barber received a  mortal wound and died the following day. Philo Dibble also received a severe  wound, but was almost instantly healed by the laying on of hands by Elder Newel  Knight.

 

The Mob Militia

 

Following the battle of the Blue, excitement ran high. November 5, 1833, at the  instigation of Lieutenant Governor Lilburn W. Boggs, the militia was called out  under command of Colonel Thomas Pitcher, one of the leaders of the mob of July  23. It was stated that the militia had been called for the protection of the  Saints, but it had every appearance of a mob and in its ranks were many of the  most bitter enemies of the Church. Colonel Pitcher demanded that the Saints  surrender their arms. This they refused to do unless their enemies should also  be disarmed. Colonel Pitcher readily agreed to this proposition to which  Lieutenant Governor Boggs also pledged his honor. Another demand was that  certain brethren who had been engaged in the battle the day before were to be  surrendered and tried for murder. Both of these demands were complied with by  the Saints.

 

Misplaced Confidence

 

Having confidence in the pledge of the lieutenant governor, the Saints returned  to their homes feeling somewhat secure from further attacks. Their confidence,  however, had been misplaced, for it was a cunning scheme of this state official,  and the other leaders of the mob, to place the members of the Church in a  defenseless position and then drive them from the county; which, forthwith, they  proceeded to do. The arms were never taken from the members of the mob, but  those taken from the Saints were distributed among their enemies to be used  against them.” 1  The following day gangs of men, numbering sixty or more, went  from house to house whipping the men, driving the women and children from their  homes at the muzzles of their guns, and setting fire to their houses, to make  sure their owners would not return. More than two hundred houses were destroyed  in the several raids of the mob. The men who surrendered themselves under the  charge of murder, were detained for one day and a night and sorely abused; then  they were taken out into a cornfield by this same Colonel Pitcher and told to  “clear!” meaning they were to leave immediately for parts unknown.

 

The Saints in Exile

 

These attacks continued for several days and among those directing the forces of  the mob were several “reverend” gentlemen who took pleasure in these wicked  deeds. By the 7th of November, the banks of the Missouri River were lined with  refugees who had gathered in the utmost confusion, so hasty had been their  flight. Twelve hundred souls were thus forced to seek shelter, the best they  could, in the dead of winter, and in the midst of storms. Many died from  exposure and the abuse otherwise heaped upon them and the fleeing multitude  left, in the frozen stubble, a trail of blood from their lacerated feet. The  exiled Saints sought refuge in the neighboring counties, but from some of these  they were again forced to flee before the inhospitable inhabitants among whom  they found themselves. In Clay County, just across the river north of Jackson,  they were received temporarily with some degree of kindness.

 

An Attempt to Seek Redress

 

Through their attorneys, and by direct petition to Governor Daniel Dunklin, the  Saints sought to repossess their property in Jackson County. The governor  acknowledged the justice of their claims and expressed a willingness to furnish  an “adequate force” to effect that object; but he declared he had no power to  protect them after they were once returned to their lands. He was also willing,  so it was declared by Attorney General R. W. Wells, to organize them in  companies of militia that they might aid in their restoration. The Saints knew  that such a thing would only arouse their enemies to greater fury, and as no  protection was guaranteed them when once restored, such an offer could not be  accepted.

 

Farcical Effort to Enforce the Law

 

It may have been the intention of the state officials, at the first, to restore  the exiles to their lands, but they evidently lacked the courage to cope with  the lawless, but determined, enemies of the Saints. A number of leading elders  were subpoenaed in behalf of the state to appear at the February (1834) term of  court to be held at Independence. On the 23rd of that month, under the  protection of Captain Atchison’s company of “Liberty Blues” nearly fifty rank  and file  these witnesses crossed the Missouri River bound for Independence.  That night they camped in the woods. Captain Atchison, becoming alarmed at the  appearance of the enemy, sent an express to Colonel Allen for two hundred  drafted militia, and to Liberty for more ammunition. Early the next morning this  company marched to Independence, and after breakfast they were visited by  District Attorney Ames Reese and Attorney General R.  W. Wells, who informed the  witnesses that all hopes of criminal prosecution were at an end. Mr. Wells had  been sent by the governor to investigate the Jackson County outrages, but the  bold front of the mob evidently intimidated the state officials who were willing  to appease the wrath of the mob rather than to maintain the majesty of the law.

 

As soon as Captain Atchison was informed that his services were no longer  needed, he took his witnesses and marched them out of town, to the tune of  Yankee Doodle, quick time, and soon returned to camp. One of the witnesses,  Elder William W. Phelps, wrote of this farcical proceeding as follows: “This  order was issued by the court, apparently on the speedy gathering of the old  mob, or citizens of Jackson County, and their assuming such a boisterous and  mobocratic appearance. Much credit is due to Captain Atchison for his gallantry  and hospitality, and I think I can say of the officers and company, that their  conduct as soldiers and men, is highly reputable; so much the more, knowing as I  do, the fatal results of the trial had the militia come or not come. .  . . Thus  ended all hopes of redress, even with a guard ordered by the governor for the  protection of the court and witnesses.”

 

Notes

 

1.  In the spring of 1834, Governor Dunklin issued a requisition to Colonel S.  D. Lucas to return the arms to the “Mormons” which were taken from them in  November, 1833; but Lucas had resigned his commission and moved to Lexington,  Missouri. A second requisition to Colonel Pitcher was contemptuously ignored.  The arms were distributed among the mob and they boasted that they would not  return them, notwithstanding the order of the governor of the state; and the  arms were never returned.

 

 Chapter 20 The Patriarchal Priesthood. Zion’s Camp. 1833 through 1834

 

The Patriarchal Priesthood

 

December 18, 1833, a number of elders assembled in the printing office in  Kirtland and dedicated the printing press, with all that pertained thereunto,  unto the service of the Lord. The first sheets of the re-printed Evening and  Morning Star were struck off, it having been decided to continue that periodical  in Kirtland until the press could be restored in Independence.1 While the elders  were assembled in the printing office on this occasion the Prophet gave the  first patriarchal blessings in this dispensation. It was his privilege to do  this, for he held the keys of all the authority in the Church, and was spoken of  as the first patriarch in the Church because of this fact, in the minutes which  were kept at that time. Those who received blessings under his hands on this  occasion were: Oliver Cowdery, the father and mother of the Prophet, and three  of his brothers, Hyrum, Samuel and William Smith. Oliver Cowdery, who held the  keys of Priesthood with the Prophet, also gave a number of patriarchal  blessings. Joseph Smith, Sen., was ordained to the Patriarchal Priesthood, to  hold the keys of blessing on the heads of all the members of the Church, the  Lord revealing that it was his right to hold this authority. He was also set  apart as an assistant counselor to the Prophet Joseph in the presidency, and at  a later day Hyrum Smith, the Prophet’s brother, and John Smith, his uncle, were  set apart to this same calling.

 

Organization of the First High Council

 

The first high council in this dispensation was organized at the home of Joseph  Smith in Kirtland, February 17, 1834. The First Presidency presided in this  council and the following brethren were chosen as its members: Joseph Smith,  Sen., John Smith, Joseph Coe, John Johnson, Martin Harris, John S. Carter, Jared  Carter, Oliver Cowdery, Samuel H. Smith, Orson Hyde, Sylvester Smith and Luke S.  Johnson.2 Several days before this action was taken the Prophet had explained  the manner in which councils should be conducted. “No man,” said he, “is capable  of judging a matter in council unless his own heart is pure.” Ancient councils  were conducted with strict propriety; no one was permitted to whisper, leave the  room, or think of anything but the matter before them for consideration. If the  presiding officer could stay, others were expected to do the same, until the  Spirit was obtained and a righteous decision was reached.

 

There were a number of cases awaiting the action of the high council as soon as  it was organized, and within a day or two several trials were held and matters  of discipline passed upon. One question considered was as follows: “Whether  disobedience to the word of wisdom was a transgression sufficient to deprive an  official member from holding office in the Church, after having it sufficiently  taught him?” After a free and full discussion Joseph Smith, who presided, gave  his decision as follows: “No official member in this Church is worthy to hold an  office after having the word of wisdom properly taught him; and he, the official  member, neglecting to comply with or obey it.” This decision was confirmed by  unanimous vote.

 

Zion Shall Not be Removed

 

A revelation was given to Joseph Smith December 16, 1833, giving the reason for  the expulsion of the members of the Church from Jackson County (Doc. and Cov.  Sec. 101). Nevertheless the Lord declared that Zion should “not be moved out of  her place, notwithstanding her children are scattered.” In his own due time he  would redeem Zion, and let fall the sword of his indignation in behalf of his  people. The cup of his wrath was to be poured out without measure upon all  nations, when the cup of their iniquity is full. The Saints were instructed to  “Importune for redress and redemption” before the judge, and if he should fail,  then before the governor, and if they could not obtain redress from him they  were to importune the president of the United States, and if he heeded them  not, then the Lord would “vex the nation.” The Church was instructed to purchase  lands in Jackson and neighboring counties, for inheritances for the Saints.  Moreover, they were instructed in a parable to gather together the strength of  the Lord’s house, “My young men and they that are middle aged also among all my  servants, who are the strength of mine house, save those only whom I have  appointed to tarry,” said the Lord, “and go straightway unto the land of my  vineyard, and redeem my vineyard, for it is mine, I have bought it with money.”  February 24, 1834, the Lord further declared that if his Saints would, from that  time forth, repent and keep his commandments, they should “begin to prevail”  against his enemies from that very hour; but if they polluted their inheritances  they were to be thrown down, for he would not spare them if they polluted their  inheritances. “The redemption of Zion must needs come by power,” he declared,  therefore the Saints were to collect money and purchase lands, as they had been  commanded, and the young and middle aged were to gather to Zion and seek its  redemption.

 

Zion’s Camp

 

According to this instruction, a call went forth asking for volunteers to go to  Zion. Five hundred men were wanted; yet, said the Lord: “If you cannot obtain  five hundred, seek diligently that peradventure ye may obtain one hundred;” for  with less than one hundred they were not to go. The first of May (1834) a part  of these volunteers left Kirtland, and on the fifth Joseph Smith and the  remainder took up their journey. At West Portage, about fifty miles west of  Kirtland, they met and were organized in companies for the journey. Each company  was divided as follows: a captain, two cooks, two firemen, two tent-men, two  water-men, one runner, two wagoners and horsemen, and one commissary, twelve  men in all. Every night before retiring, at the sound of the bugle they bowed  before the Lord in prayer in their several tents, and every morning, at the  trumpet’s call about four o’clock, every man again knelt in prayer, imploring  the blessings of the Lord for the day. As they traveled they endeavored to keep  their identity unknown so as not to arouse opposition in the country through  which they passed. As it was they were followed by enemies and spies, and  delegations approached them from time to time to learn the meaning of their  journey. The following questions were frequently put and answered in this  manner:

 

“Where are you from?”

 

“From the East.”

 

“Where are you going?”

 

“To the West.”

 

“What for?”

 

“To see where we can get land cheapest and best.”

 

“Who leads the camp?”

 

“Sometimes one and sometimes another.”

 

Their journey took them through Dayton, Indianapolis, Springfield and  Jacksonville, Illinois, and across the Mississippi River into Missouri. It was  near the banks of the Illinois River, west of Jacksonville, where the bones of  Zelph3 the white Lamanite, were dug up and mounds, or ancient altars, were  discovered. This was about the first of June, and on the third, while still  camped on the banks of the river refreshing themselves, the Prophet Joseph got  up on a wagon and uttered this prophecy: “I said the Lord had revealed to me  that a scourge would come upon the camp in consequence of the fractious and  unruly spirits that appeared among them, and they should die like sheep with the  rot; still, if they would repent and humble themselves before the Lord, the  scourge in great measure might be turned away; but as the Lord lives, the  members of this camp will suffer for giving way to their unruly temper.” Even  this warning did not prevent some of the members of the camp from murmuring and  finding fault against their brethren.

 

Message to Governor Dunklin

 

Acting on the commandment in the revelations the brethren in Missouri did not  cease to importune the judge and the governor of the state, May 29, 1834, and  again June 5, the Saints in Clay County petitioned the governor, and on the 6th,  he wrote to Colonel J. Thornton acknowledging the just cause of the Saints in  this demand made of him, stating:

 

 “Uncommitted as I am to either party, I shall feel no embarrassment in doing my  duty though it may be done with the most extreme regret. My duty in the relation  which I now stand to the parties, is plain and straight forward. . . . A more  clear and indisputable right does not exist than that of the Mormon people, who  were expelled from their homes in Jackson County, to return and live on their  lands; and if they cannot be persuaded, as a matter of policy, to give up that  right, or to qualify it, my course as the chief executive of the State, is a  plain one. The constitution of the United States declares that, ‘The citizens of  each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in  the several states.’”

 

He then suggested to Colonel Thornton, which proposition he also presented to  the Saints, that they sell out and move from their possessions; or, to attempt  to peaceably settle their difficulties, and he would attempt to get the citizens  to “rescind their illegal resolves” against the “Mormons” and agree to conform  to the laws. If all this should fail, and they could not agree to divide their  lands, then he would have to conform his action to that end, indicating that in  justice he would be bound to assist the exiles to regain their property.

 

All such expressions led the members of the Church to hope for redress. Acting  on this thought, about the 8th of June, a delegation from Zion’s Camp was sent  to Jefferson City to ascertain from the governor if he was ready to reinstate  the Latter-day Saints on their lands in Jackson County, and leave them there to  defend themselves, as he had previously indicated that he would. If so, they  were ready, by command of the Lord, to take that course.

 

In the meantime the camp continued on its journey. To accept the governor’s  proposition to sell their lands, was out of the question; as soon would they  expect to sell their children, for the Lord had commanded them to retain their  possessions, or inheritances in that land. On the 15th of June, 1834, Orson Hyde  and Parley P. Pratt, the delegates, returned from Jefferson City and reported  that the governor refused to fulfil his promise. For some reason, which is not  explained but which may be guessed, he had received a change of heart, although  his reason was stated to be on the ground of “impracticability.” Such a  lamentable failure on the part of the governor to do his duty, was a severe  blow to the Saints.

 

Threats of the Mob

 

On the morning of June 19, 1834, as the camp was passing through Richmond,  Missouri, they were informed by a friendly farmer who entertained them and gave  them refreshments, that they had many enemies about, and that a mob from Jackson  and other counties was intending to intercept them before they could reach their  brethren in Clay County. This was later confirmed. Their progress, by act of  divine providence, was impeded which forced them to camp between the Little and  Big Fishing rivers that night. As they were making camp five men rode up and  told them they would “see hell before morning.” They stated that an armed force  from Ray and Clay counties was to join a Jackson County force at the Fishing  River ford bent on the utter destruction of the camp. While these five men were  in the camp, cursing and swearing vengeance, signs of an approaching storm were  seen. No sooner had these men left the camp than the storm burst in all its  fury. Hailstones so large that they cut limbs from the trees fell all around the  camp, while the trees were twisted from their roots by the force of the wind.  The earth trembled and quaked, the streams became raging torrents, and the  mobbers dispersed seeking shelter that could not be found. One mobber was killed  by lightning and another had his hand torn off by a fractious horse, and in fear  they dispersed, saying, if that was the way God fought for the “Mormons” they  would go about their business. On the morning of June 21, Colonel Sconce with  two companions visited the camp to learn what the intention of the members were.  He said: “I see there is an almighty power that protects this people, for I  started from Richmond, Ray County, with a company of armed men, having a fixed  determination to destroy you, but was kept back by the storm. The Prophet  related to these men the sufferings of the Saints, and they left the camp  offering to use their influence to allay the excitement which prevailed. During  all this storm the members of the camp were protected from its fury.

 

Judge Ryland’s Proposition

 

Evidently with the best of intentions, Judge John F. Ryland, on the 10th of June  1834, wrote to Algernon S. Gilbert offering to call a meeting in Liberty on the  16th, for the purpose of allaying the “disturbances between the Mormons and the  citizens of Jackson County.” A similar communication was sent to prominent  citizens of Jackson County. In their answer Elders John Corrill and A. S.  Gilbert expressed a willingness to meet, but declared that under no condition  would the Saints sell their property in Jackson County. On the 16th, the  proposed meeting was held. A deputation from Jackson County was present and made  a proposition to this effect: They would buy all the lands that the “Mormons”  own in Jackson County, and also all improvements, the value of said land to be  determined by three disinterested parties; twelve of the “Mormons” would be  permitted to go into Jackson County, to show their lands and improvements; the  purchase was to be made within thirty days after the decision was reached, and  one hundred per cent would be added to the appraisement. On the other hand, the  “Mormons” were offered all the lands of the citizens of Jackson on the same  terms. This proposition was signed by ten men who stated they were authorized to  take this action.

 

After the reading of the proposition Samuel C. Owens, one of the Jackson  committee, made a war speech and was followed by Rev. Riley who declared that  “the Mormons have lived long enough in Clay County; and they must clear out, or  be cleared out.” The moderator of the meeting. Mr. Turnham, replied: “Let us be  republicans; let us honor our country, and not disgrace it like Jackson County;  don’t disfranchise or drive away the Mormons. They are better citizens than many  of the old inhabitants.” General A. W. Doniphan arose and said: “That’s a fact,  and as the Mormons have armed themselves, if they don’t fight they are cowards.  I love to hear that they have brethren coming to their assistance. Greater love  can no man show, than he who lays down his life for his brethren.” At this  instant pistols and knives were drawn and the cry was raised at the door that a  man was stabbed. The mass instantly rushed out to see what had happened, and the  meeting broke up in confusion.

 

Unfairness of the Proposition

 

Reflecting on the proposition offered by the mob committee from Jackson, the  Prophet Joseph writes: “It may be thought, at first view, that the mob committee  made a fair proposition to the Saints, in offering to buy their lands at a price  fixed by disinterested arbitrators, and one hundred per centum added thereto,  payment to be made in thirty days, and offering theirs on the same terms; but  when it is understood that the mob held possession of a much larger quantity of  land than the Saints, and that they only offered thirty days for the payment,  having previously robbed the Saints of nearly everything, it will be readily  seen that they were only making a sham to cover their previous unlawful  conduct.” To meet this proposition, which was not made in sincerity, the Saints  would have been under the necessity of raising in thirty days approximately six  hundred thousand dollars, a thing out of reason, which the mobbers knew.  Moreover, they were well aware of the fact that the Saints would not sell  although ten times the value of the land were offered, for the Lord had  commanded them to hold to their inheritances.

 

Counter Proposition of the Saints

 

Some time later a counter proposition was made by the Saints to the Missourians.  They offered to buy out all those who were unwilling to dwell in Jackson County  with them in peace, on such terms as had been offered except that the payment  would be made in one year. A committee of twelve, six from each side were to  determine the value of the lands. It is needless to say that the proposition was  not received very kindly by these hypocrites and deceivers.

 

Word of the Lord at Fishing River

 

While the camp was on Fishing River the word of the Lord came to Joseph Smith  (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 105) stating that it was not required of the camp to  continue the journey for the redemption of Zion. The camp had been brought to  the borders of Jackson County, “for a trial of their faith.” However, if it had  not been for transgression of the people, the Lord declared, “they might have  been redeemed even now. But behold, they have not learned to be obedient to the  things which I required at their hands, but are full of all manner of evil, and  do not impart of their substance, as becometh saints, to the poor and afflicted  among them, and are not united according to the union required by the law of  the celestial kingdom. And Zion cannot be built up unless it is by the  principles of the law of the celestial kingdom, otherwise I cannot receive her  unto myself; and my people must needs be chastened until they learn obedience,  if it must needs be by the things which they suffer. I speak not concerning  those who are appointed to lead my people, who are the first elders of my  church, for they are not all under this condemnation; but I speak concerning my  churches abroad there are many who will say, Where is their God? Behold, he will  deliver them in time of trouble, otherwise we will not go up unto Zion, and will  keep our moneys. Therefore, in consequence of the transgression of my people, it  is expedient in me that mine elders should wait for a little season for the  redemption of Zion.”4 The elders were to be endowed with power from on high in  the house of the Lord at Kirtland, and be taught more perfectly in doctrine and  have experience and a better knowledge of their duties, before Zion could be  redeemed. This was one reason for the building of the temple in Kirtland.

 

Disbanding of the Camp

 

On the 23rd of June (1834), the camp continued its march and the next day  arrived near the home of Algernon Sidney Gilbert on Rush Creek, where, on the  morning of the 25th, in compliance with the revelation of the 22nd, the camp was  separated into small groups to quiet the feelings of the people, and dispersed  among the brethren who were residing in Clay County.

 

The Prophecy Fulfilled

 

As soon as the camp arrived on Rush Creek, the cholera broke out among the  members and continued for several days. The victims were seized suddenly and so  powerful was the disease that within a few minutes some of the brethren were  dead. About sixty-eight members were attacked and fourteen died. Among the  number who succumbed was Algernon Sidney Gilbert, keeper of the Lord’s  storehouse in Zion, and one of the stalwart leaders who had stood in defense of  the liberty and lives of the Saints in Jackson County.

 

Organization of the High Council in Missouri

 

The day after the revelation was given regarding the endowments (Doc. and Cov.  Sec. 105), a council of high priests met and called a number of individuals to  receive these blessings in the house of the Lord; and on the 3rd of July, 1834,  the high priests assembled and a high council for the Church in Missouri was  organized agreeable to the revelation and pattern given in Kirtland. Six days  later the Prophet started back for Kirtland with a number of the brethren.

 

What the Camp Accomplished

 

While the object for which Zion’s Camp was organized and for which they made the  journey, as understood by the members, was not attained, yet without question  they did accomplish all that the Lord expected of them. So he stated in the  Fishing River revelation. Their faith was tried; experience had been gained by  which men were to be chosen for responsible positions in the Church in days to  come, and the work of the Lord advanced; but in addition to all this the Lord  was preparing men through this experience for the responsibility of moving the  entire people, of the Latter-day Saints in the great exodus to the West, which  was later to come. The purposes of the Lord do not fail and all things are  turned to his advantage.

 

Notes

 

1.  At a meeting held in Kirtland Sept. 11, 1833, it was decided that a press  should be established in that place and a paper published to be called the  Messenger and Advocate, and that the Evening and Morning Star, formerly  published in Independence, be continued in Kirtland until it could again be  published in Zion, which the brethren thought would be but a short time. All the  numbers of the Star published in Independence were republished in quarto size.  The first number of the Star was issued in June, 1832, and the last in July,  1833, the month the press was destroyed by the mob. In December, 1833, the first  number in Kirtland (No. 15) was issued, it continued until September 1834, when  it was succeeded by the “Messenger and Advocate.”

 

2.  See Doc. and Cov. Sec. 102, for procedure in High Councils and minutes of  this organization.

 

3.  See Documentary History of the Church, vol. 2:79, for this interesting  incident.

 

4.  In a letter to the high council in Zion the Prophet said: “Now, my beloved  brethren, you will learn by this we have a great work to do, and but little time  to do it in; and if we do not exert ourselves to the utmost in gathering up the  strength of the Lord’s house that this thing may be accomplished, behold there  remaineth a scourge for the Church, even that they shall be driven from city to  city, and but few shall remain to receive an inheritance.” This had reference to  preparations “against the time” when the Lord should call them again to the  redemption of Zion.

 

 Chapter 21 Choosing of the Twelve and Seventy.  Dedication of the Kirtland Temple . 1834 through 1836

 

Charges Against the Prophet

 

As already stated, there was some dissension in Zion’s Camp on the way to  Missouri. One of the chief offenders on that trip was Sylvester Smith, and when  he returned to Kirtland he repeated many of his grievances against the Prophet  Joseph Smith. This resulted in a trial before the Bishop, Newel K. Whitney, and  the high priests, and after a full investigation, the Prophet was vindicated and  Sylvester Smith after much persuasion made confession of his wrongdoing, and  repented of his sin.

 

The Law of Tithing

 

Up to this time the Saints had donated of their means according to their  disposition for the support of the Church. In Zion and Kirtland the law of  consecration had been given; but it had not been generally practiced, and since  the driving of the Saints from their homes, they were compelled to seek a living  individually after the manner of the world. In the fall of 1834, Joseph Smith  and Oliver Cowdery set an example for the Church by covenanting with the Lord  that they would give one-tenth of all he should give them, to be bestowed upon  the poor, as Jacob had covenanted centuries before. This was nearly four years  before this law of tithing was given to the Church (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 119).

 

Oliver Cowdery Assistant President

 

December 5, 1834, Oliver Cowdery was ordained by Joseph Smith by the command of  the Lord, an Assistant President of the High Priesthood, to hold the keys of  presidency with Joseph Smith in this ministry. This was in harmony with the  ordinations he received under the hands of John the Baptist and other holy  messengers in 1829.1

 

Temporary Peace

 

Notwithstanding the Saints in Missouri were not permitted to return to their  possessions, the spirit of opposition began to subside for a season, and the  elders commenced going forth two by two, preaching the Gospel throughout the  land, and many were added to the Church daily. The year 1834 came to a close  with the Saints laboring diligently to build the house of the Lord in Kirtland,  and in preparing for the School of the Elders which was to be held during the  winter months. In January, 1835, the School of the Elders commenced. Lectures on  theology were given and the study of the scriptures and other subjects were  considered for the benefit of the members of the Church, in keeping with the  revelations of the Lord.

 

Twelve Apostles Chosen

 

On the 14th of February, 1835, Brigham Young and his brother Joseph came to the  house of President Joseph Smith and sang for him. While they were visiting with  the Prophet on this occasion he told them that he desired to call together all  those who were members of Zion’s Camp, for he had a blessing for them. At this  meeting he conversed with these two brethren on the scenes of their memorable  journey and said: “Brethren, I have seen those men who died of the cholera in  our camp; and the Lord knows, if I get a mansion as bright as theirs, I ask no  more.” At this he wept and could not speak for some time. He then said the Lord  had called Brigham Young to be one of the twelve special witnesses, and Joseph  Young to be a president of the seventies.

 

A meeting was called for the 14th of February, and on that day all the members  of Zion’s Camp that could be called together assembled to receive such blessings  as the Lord had promised them. President Joseph Smith then stated that the  object of the meeting was to choose men for important positions in the ministry  to go forth and prune the vineyard for the last time. He had been commanded by  the Lord to prepare for the calling of Twelve Apostles, in fulfilment of the  revelation given before the organization of the Church (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 18).  These twelve men were to be chosen from among those who went up in Zion’s Camp,  and the three special witnesses to the Book of Mormon were to select and ordain  them. After the usual opening exercises and appropriate instructions a recess  was taken for one hour. When the meeting was later called to order the three  witnesses were blessed by the laying on of hands by the presidency; they then  united in prayer and proceeded to make choice of the Twelve Apostles. Their  names in the order in which they were chosen are as follows:2   Lyman E. Johnson   Brigham Young   Heber C. Kimball   Orson Hyde   David W. Patten   Luke S. Johnson   William E. McLellin   John F. Boynton   Orson Pratt   William Smith   Thomas B. Marsh   Parley P. Pratt

 

The witnesses then proceeded to ordain these brethren, and the first three were  ordained at that meeting. The following day all the others except Parley P.  Pratt, who was absent, Thomas B. Marsh and Orson Pratt, who were on a mission,  were ordained. Parley P. Pratt was ordained February 21; Thomas B. Marsh on  April 25 and Orson Pratt the following day.

 

A charge was given to these brethren by President Oliver Cowdery, and items of  valuable instruction were imparted by President Joseph Smith. In this way  another important step in the development of the Priesthood and the organization  of the Church was accomplished.

 

The Seventy

 

On the 28th of February, 1835, another meeting was called and selection was made  from those who went to Missouri in Zion’s Camp to create the first quorum of  seventy. Hazen Aldrich, Joseph Young, Levi W. Hancock, Leonard Rich, Zebedee  Coltrin, Lyman Sherman and Sylvester Smith were called to the office of  presidents of this quorum of seventy. These brethren and those appointed to form  the quorum3 were ordained under the hands of the First Presidency. This was  another step toward the completion of the ministry and perfect development of  the latter day work. Each step came in its turn, and in like manner the  doctrines of the kingdom were unfolded, here a little and there a little, until  the perfect organization was established on the earth.

 

Blessings of Those Who Built the Temple

 

Another conference was called March 7, for the purpose of blessing those who had  assisted, by labor or other means, in the building of the Kirtland Temple, which  was nearing completion. This conference continued during the 8th, and all those  who were available were blessed with special blessings who had assisted in this  necessary work preparatory to the receiving of the promised endowment.

 

The Great Revelation on Priesthood

 

The Twelve Apostles met in council, March 12, 1835, and were appointed by the  presidency to a mission through the Eastern States, visiting the branches and  regulating the affairs of the Church therein. March 28, as they were about ready  to depart, they sought the Prophet for a blessing by revelation from the Lord.  “We have unitedly asked God our heavenly Father to grant unto us,” they said,  “through his seer a revelation of his mind and will concerning our duty the  coming season, even a great revelation, that will enlarge our hearts, comfort us  in adversity, and brighten our hopes amidst the powers of darkness.” They were  not disappointed, for the Lord gave unto them a great revelation on Priesthood  (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 107) in which the various offices, and the powers pertaining  thereto, were fully defined. It was explained that there are two Priesthoods in  the Church, “namely, the Melchizedek and the Aaronic, including the Levitical  Priesthood. Why the first is called the Melchizedek Priesthood, is because  Melchizedek was such a great High Priest. Before his day it was called The Holy  Priesthood after the Order of the Son of God; but out of respect or reverence  to the name of the Supreme Being, to avoid the too frequent repetition of his  name, they, the Church in ancient days, called that Priesthood after  Melchizedek, or the Melchizedek Priesthood. All other authorities or offices in  the Church are appendages to this Priesthood.” 4  Immediately following the  giving of this revelation which sets forth the duties of the twelve, the  apostles started on their first missionary journey as they had been appointed.

 

The Book of Abraham

 

On the 3rd of July, 1835, Michael H. Chandler, came to Kirtland exhibiting four  mummies and some rolls of papyrus covered with hieroglyphic figures. Mr.  Chandler had been directed to the Prophet Joseph Smith as one who could  translate the characters for him. At his request Joseph Smith gave a translation  of a few of them which Mr. Chandler stated agreed with the decipherings of  learned men who had examined them. He gave the Prophet a certificate to this  effect. Shortly after this interview some of the Saints in Kirtland purchased  the mummies and the manuscripts, and, with Oliver Cowdery and Wm. W. Phelps as  scribes, the Prophet commenced to translate these records. To their great joy  they discovered that one of these rolls contained writings of Abraham, or  instructions given to him in Egypt from the Lord. The other contained writings  of Joseph, son of Jacob. During the summer the Prophet prepared for the complete  translation of the Book of Abraham, as it is called, which now appears in the  Pearl of Great Price,5 one of the accepted standard works of the Church.

 

The Doctrine and Covenants

 

A general assembly of the Church was held in Kirtland, August 17, 1835, to  consider the labors, of a committee appointed by a general assembly of the  Church, September 24, 1834, for the purpose of arranging the items of doctrine  and the revelations for publication. This committee was composed of the  following: Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G.  Williams. The committee having finished their work they called a general  assembly on the above date to consider their labors. It should be understood  that the printing of the revelations according to the action of the conference  of the Church, on a previous date in 1831, had miscarried, due to the  destruction of the printing press in Independence in July, 1833, and the  destruction of most of the forms which had been issued up to that time. At this  general assembly Oliver Cowdery and Sidney Rigdon, of the presidency, were in  charge; the Prophet and Frederick G. Williams were at the time on a visit in  Michigan. All the quorums of the Priesthood were arranged in order; Thomas  Burdick, Warren Parrish and Sylvester Smith were appointed clerks. The usual  procedure at conferences of the Church was followed, and the morning session was  devoted to ordinations and the transaction of other important business. In the  afternoon Oliver Cowdery introduced the “Book of Doctrine and Covenants of the  Church” in behalf of the committee. Sidney Rigdon followed with instructions  pertaining to the manner of voting, by which they intended to obtain the voice  of the assembly for or against the book. Each of the councils and quorums of the  Priesthood then by separate vote acknowledged the revelations which had been  selected for a place in the book, as from the Lord, and the doctrine and  covenants of their faith. A written acknowledgment from the Twelve Apostles,  which had evidently been prepared before their departure for their mission, was  read. It is as follows:

 

Testimony of the Twelve Apostles to the Truth of the Book of Doctrine and  Covenants

 

 “The testimony of the Witnesses to the Book of the Lord’s Commandments, which  commandments he gave to his Church through Joseph Smith, Jr., who was appointed,  by the voice of the Church, for this purpose.

 

“We therefore feel willing to bear testimony to all the world of mankind, to  every creature upon the face of all the earth, that the Lord has borne record to  our souls through the Holy Ghost shed forth upon us, that these commandments  were given by inspiration of God, and are profitable for all men, and are verily  true. We give this testimony unto the world, the Lord being our helper; and it  is through the grace of God the Father, and His Son Jesus Christ, that we are  permitted to have this privilege of bearing this testimony unto the world, in  the which we rejoice exceedingly, praying the Lord always that the children of  men may be profited thereby.

 

Thomas B. Marsh,  David W. Patten,  Brigham Young,  Heber C. Kimball,  Orson Hyde,  William E. McLellin,  Parley P. Pratt,  Luke S. Johnson,  William Smith,  Orson Pratt,  John F. Boynton,  Lyman E. Johnson.”

 

To the revelations were added by vote of this assembly, the Lectures on Faith,  which had been given in the School of the Elders (Prophets) earlier in the year,  and an article on Government and Laws in General; also one on Marriage. These  lectures and the two articles mentioned were not received, however, as doctrine  and binding on the Church, as were the revelations. The minutes of this  gathering were signed by Oliver Cowdery and Sidney Rigdon as Presidents, and by  the three clerks. They were published in the book when printed, with a preface  signed by the presidency, with date of February 17, 1835.

 

Close of the Year 1835

 

The close of the year 1835 found the Prophet busy working on the Book of  Abraham, which, among other great truths, revealed principles pertaining to  astronomy as taught to Abraham. Many council meetings were held, and the twelve  were instructed that they were to take their families and move to Missouri the  following summer with the presidency, after the endowment in the temple was  received. The School of the Elders was continued, and the study of grammar and  Hebrew, under a competent instructor, became an important part of their work.  The elders were preparing for the solemn assembly which was soon to convene in  the Kirtland Temple, now nearly completed. Peace and tranquility prevailed,  which permitted the Prophet and the Saints to accomplish many things essential  to the welfare of the Church. The one thing that marred the peace which was  granted for a season was the rebellious spirit manifested by William Smith  against the Prophet, which nearly cost William his standing in the Church.  Charges were made against him before the high council, but on his show of  repentance he was forgiven. Christian Whitmer, one of the eight witnesses to the  Book of Mormon, died in Clay County, Missouri, November 27, 1835, firm in the  faith. He was one of the members of the high council in Missouri.

 

Anointing and Blessings in the Temple

 

Much time was spent in January and February, 1836, in council meetings and the  filling of vacancies in the various organizations of the Priesthood. Professor  Seixas, a thorough Hebrew scholar, was employed to teach the Hebrew language, in  the stead of Dr. Piexotto, who had failed to live up to his contract. Thursday,  January 21, the first of a number of meetings in the temple was held. These  gatherings continued through several days, in which the faithful elders of the  Church received blessings by the laying on of hands and anointing with oil.

 

At this first meeting the presidency met, and Father Joseph Smith, the  patriarch, was anointed and blessed. He then anointed and blessed each of the  brethren of the presidency, beginning with the oldest, pronouncing such  blessings upon them as the Spirit of the Lord revealed, and many prophecies were  uttered by each of them.

 

A Vision

 

While thus engaged the heavens were opened and the Prophet received the  following vision:

 

 “I beheld the celestial kingdom of God, and the glory thereof, whether in the  body or out I cannot tell. I saw the transcendent beauty of the gate through  which the heirs of that kingdom will enter, which was like unto circling flames  of fire; also the blazing throne of God, whereon was seated the Father and the  Son. I saw the beautiful streets of that kingdom, which had the appearance of  being paved with gold. I saw Fathers Adam and Abraham, and my father and mother,  my brother, Alvin, that has long since slept, and marveled how it was that he  had obtained an inheritance in the kingdom, seeing that he had departed this  life before the Lord had set his hand to gather Israel the second time and had  not been baptized for the remission of sins.

 

“Thus came the voice of the Lord to me, saying  

 

“‘All who have died without a knowledge of this Gospel, who would have received  it if they had been permitted to tarry, shall be heirs of the celestial kingdom  of God; also all that shall die henceforth without a knowledge of it, who would  have received it with all their hearts, shall be heirs of that kingdom; for I,  the Lord, will judge all men according to their works; according to the desire  of their hearts.’

 

“And I also beheld that all children who die before they arrive at the years of  accountability are saved in the celestial kingdom of heaven.”

 

Many other wonderful manifestations they beheld, and angels ministered to them;  the power of the Lord rested upon them and the house was filled with the glory  of God. The Prophet’s scribe, Warren Parrish, saw the armies of heaven, and  visions of the redemption of Zion.

 

At this and succeeding meetings the various councils and presiding officers in  the several quorums, each in turn, received blessings by the anointing of oil  and laying on of hands, such as the patriarch and presidency had received, and  the visions of heaven were opened to their view with wonderful manifestations of  the glory and power of God, and they shouted, “Hosanna to God and the Lamb.”

 

The Solemn Assembly

 

In the city of Kirtland on Sunday, March 27, 1836, the members of the Church  realized their hopes, long anticipated, when they gathered in the temple in  solemn assembly. As early as 1832, the Lord had given commandment for the  building of a house to his name, for such a place was not to be found on the  earth; nor had there been for many centuries. The ground was broken for this  building, June 5, 1833; the corner stones were laid on the 23rd of the following  month the same day the Saints in Jackson County were forced by mob violence from  their homes. Now the house was finished; a monument to the faith and industry of  the little band of Latterly Saints who had constructed it in their poverty,  amidst the threatened violence of enemies. It is a building of no mean  proportions; built of stone; eighty feet in length, sixty in width, fifty feet  to the square, with a tower one hundred ten feet from the ground. The 27th of  March, 1836, was a solemn and momentous occasion. Long before the appointed hour  the building was thronged with eager and interested people, many were turned  away for lack of room. At nine o’clock the session was called to order by  President Sidney Rigdon, who, in the midst of breathless silence, read the 96th  and the 24th psalms. The choir then sang: “Ere long the veil will rend in  twain” which declaration was to be fulfilled earlier than the congregation  realized. After prayer and another song appropriate remarks were made, and then  the various officers of the Church were sustained by separate vote, which  procedure was interspersed with singing.

 

The Prayer of Dedication

 

The prayer of dedication which had been given by revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec.  109) was offered and the house was presented to the Lord.6 Following the prayer,  the congregation sang the hymn Hosanna7 which had been written for this  occasion, and then shouted “Hosanna, hosanna, hosanna, to God and the Lamb,”  sealing it with “Amen, Amen, and Amen.” Angels were present and the Holy Spirit,  like the sound of a mighty rushing wind, filled the house and rested upon the  assembly. The people of the neighborhood came running together hearing a strange  sound and seeing a bright light resting on the temple. The house had been  accepted by the Lord.

 

Endowments Given

 

As soon as the Temple was dedicated, ordinance work for the elders was  commenced. The ordinance of washing of feet which the Prophet said was never  intended but for the official members of the Church 8  was attended to in behalf  of the leading quorums, and other ordinances were performed. The Savior appeared  to several of the brethren and angels ministered to others in these meetings. It  was indeed a time of Pentecost to the Saints.

 

The Coming of Moses, Elias and Elijah

 

After the administering of the Sacrament in the temple at the meeting held  Sunday, April 3, 1836, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery retired to the pulpit,  the veils9 being dropped, and there bowed in silent prayer. After rising from  their knees the Savior appeared to them standing on the breast-work of the  pulpit and blessed them, accepting the building in his name. After this vision  closed, the heavens were again opened, and Moses appeared committing to them the  keys of the gathering of Israel; Elias, who lived in the days of Abraham, then  appeared, and committed to them the keys of the dispensation of the Gospel of  Abraham. Then another glorious vision burst upon them and Elijah appeared and  committed to them the keys, in fulfilment of the prediction of Malachi, of the  turning of the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the hearts of the  children to the fathers, which was to be done before the coming of the great and  dreadful day of the Lord.10

 

The Elders Prepared to Teach

 

In the revelation given on Fishing River (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 105) the Lord had  said the elders must be endowed with power from on high before they would be  fully prepared to go forth to build up the Church and “prune” his vineyard. This  endowment having now been received, and the various keys of different  dispensations having now been restored, the elders were prepared for their  ministry among the nations of the earth. Following these blessings they began to  go forth spreading abroad in all parts of the land, preaching the word in power  as they had never experienced it before, and many received their testimony and  were numbered among the people of the Lord.

 

Notes

 

 1. The record which gives an account of this ordination has this to say: “The  office of Assistant President is to assist in presiding over the whole Church,  and to officiate in the absence of the President, according to his rank and  appointment, viz.; President Cowdery, first; President Rigdon, second, and  President Williams, third, as they were severally called. The office of this  Priesthood is also to act as spokesman, taking Aaron for an example. The virtue  of the above Priesthood is to hold, the keys of the kingdom of heaven or the  Church militant” (MS. History of the Church Book A, Chapter 1).

 

The account of Oliver’s ordination is given in the same record as follows:  “After addressing the throne of mercy, President Smith laid hands upon High  Counselor Cowdery, and ordained him to the Presidency of the High Priesthood in  the Church, saying: ‘Brother, in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, who was  crucified for the sins of the world, that we through the virtue of his blood  might come to the Father, I lay my hands upon thy head, and ordain thee a  President of the High and Holy Priesthood, to assist in presiding over the  Church, and bearing the keys of this kingdom which Priesthood is after the order  of Melchizedek  which is after the order of the Son of God.’”

 

 2. Later they were arranged in order of precedence according to age as follows:   Thomas B. Marsh   David W. Patten   Brigham Young   Heber C. Kimball   Orson Hyde   William E. McLellin   Parley P. Pratt   Luke S. Johnson   William Smith   Orson Pratt   John F. Boynton   Lyman E. Johnson

 

3.  For the names of those who formed this quorum of seventy see the Documentary  History of the Church, vol. 2:203; and for the names of the members of Zion’s  Camp see the same volume, pages 183  through 5.

 

4.  This important revelation should receive careful study for few revelations  have been given containing greater instruction for the Church.

 

5.  This Book of Abraham, like the Book of Moses, which also appears in the  Pearl of Great Price, is another addition to our collection of lost scripture  which the Lord, through his wisdom, has restored. These records contain many  important revelations, and should be carefully read. The history of the  discovery of these rolls of papyrus, and the guiding hand of the Lord which  placed them in the hands of Joseph Smith is set forth in the Documentary History  of the Church, vol. 2:348  through 51. See also Messenger and Advocate, Dec. 1835.

 

6.  These ceremonies were repeated for the benefit of those who could not gain  admittance at the first session.

 

7.  “The Spirit of God like a fire is burning.”

 

8.  Documentary History of the Church, vol. 2:309.

 

9.  There were four veils in the temple arranged crosswise, so that they could  be lowered and divide the assembly room into four parts.

 

10.  See Doc. and Cov. Sec. 110, for an account of these visions.

 

 Chapter 22 Clay County Rejects the Saints. Apostasy and Sorrow. 1836 through 1837

 

Dishonorable Action of Governor Dunklin

 

Governor Daniel Dunklin, of Missouri, who showed some sense of honor and  willingness to enforce the law at the beginning of the trouble in Jackson  County, later manifested a spirit of fellowship with the stronger side, against  right and justice a trait common with many politicians. In a communication to  William W. Phelps and others, bearing date of July 18, 1836, he cravenly  insinuated that the mobbings and expulsion of the Latter-day Saints from Jackson  County, was due to faults of their own; the people would not have united against  them, without some reason, and while they had some friends at first even these  had forsaken them. Whether his conclusion was right or wrong, he maintained it  to be the duty of the Saints to convince their enemies of their innocence and  worthiness. “If you cannot do this,” he wrote, “all I can say to you is that in  this Republic the vox populi is the vox Dei.” Such was the contemptible answer  of the governor of a sovereign state, to an innocent people, driven from their  homes and smitten by their enemies, because of their faith in the Gospel of our  Redeemer.

 

Clay County Rejects the Saints

 

When the exiled Saints were driven from Jackson County, they found a place of  refuge in Clay County, just over the Missouri River to the north. Here the  people were hospitable and kindly disposed. The Saints had no intention of  remaining in Clay County, for they fully expected to be restored to their former  homes. After exhausting every source of redress, even to an appeal to the  President of the United States, they prepared to make permanent settlement by  purchasing lands. As time passed and the indication pointed to the gathering of  the Latter-day Saints in that county, the citizens became alarmed. The people  from Jackson were constantly menacing the Saints, even though they were  peacefully minding their business in their new homes, but wrong begets wrong,  and the deep-seated hatred of these mobbers had no end. Finally the citizens of  Clay County decided to do the wrong thing, to their everlasting injury, and rid  themselves, once and for all, from the danger which they felt confronted them by  harboring the “Mormons” in their midst. That there was a danger of conflict  there can be no question, with the menacing influence on the south, and growing  hatred, because of association of the mobbers with many of the residents of the  county to the north. However, these Clay County citizens preferred to expel the  Saints in a gentle way if it could be done. A mass meeting was held June 29,  1836, for the purpose of presenting, with united front, a petition to the  undesirable exiles, kindly requesting them to move to some part of the country  where they could be entirely by themselves. The new country of Wisconsin was  suggested as a suitable place. A report of conditions as they understood them  and resolutions embodying their request, were unanimously approved. They did not  fail to call attention to their great hospitality and kindness in 1833, when  they received the exiles among them; and endeavored to impress upon the Saints  the thought that they were devoid of “one spark of gratitude” if they refused to  accept the suggestions offered to depart in peace to a more congenial locality.  Yet they frankly admitted, “we do not contend that we have the least right to  expel them by force,” but if they would not go they were sure it would lead to  civil war, “bearing ruin, woe, and desolation, in its course.”

 

Some of the reasons why the “Mormons” had become “objects of the deepest hatred  and detestation” to many of the citizens were declared in the petition to be as  follows:

 

 “They are eastern men, whose manners, habits, customs, and even dialect, are  essentially different from our own. They are non-slave-holders, and opposed to  slavery, which in this peculiar period, when Abolitionism has reared its  deformed and haggard visage in our land, is well calculated to excite deep and  abiding prejudices in any community where slavery is tolerated and protected.

 

“In addition to all this, they are charged, as they have hitherto been, with  keeping up a constant communication with our Indian tribes on our frontiers,  with declaring, even from the pulpit, that the Indians are a part of God’s  chosen people and are destined by heaven to inherit this land, in common with  themselves. We do not vouch for the correctness of these statements; but whether  they are true or false, their effect has been the same in exciting our  community. In times of greater tranquility, such ridiculous remarks might well  be regarded as the offspring of frenzied fanaticism; but at this time, our  defenseless situation on the frontier, the bloody disasters of our fellow  citizens in Florida, and other parts of the South, all tend to make a portion of  our citizens regard such sentiments with horror if not alarm. These and many  other causes have combined to raise a prejudice against them; and a feeling of  hostility, that the first spark may, and we deeply fear will, ignite into all  the horrors and desolations of a civil war, the worst evil that can befall any  country.”

 

For these real and fancied “wrongs” this people must move again, for their  presence was obnoxious. These foolish citizens, acting as they thought in their  own best interests, rejected the everlasting Gospel against themselves, as well  as the people who proclaimed it.

 

The Saints’ Reply

 

Three days later (July 1, 1836), the Saints met in council and formulated their  reply. They accepted the requisitions of the citizens of Clay County,  notwithstanding the added loss of property that would be entailed. They also  thanked these citizens for their hospitality during the period of the sojourn  among them, which covered a period of more than two and one half years. Let it  be said that many of these citizens sympathized with the “Mormons” and proffered  material help to aid them in the removal from the county; but in this drastic  action they were acting, as they sincerely thought, in the best interests of  their communities.

 

When the First Presidency heard of this ultimatum they fully endorsed the action  taken by the Missouri Saints, and in a communication to the Clay County  committee notified them of the fact. They also took occasion to inform the  committee of many other things, in humility, which should have appealed to their  sense of justice and touched their hearts.1

 

Caldwell County Organized

 

In pursuance of this action the Saints began to move from Clay County as soon as  circumstances would permit, and located on Shoal Creek, in an uninhabited  section in the north part of Ray County. The property of the few settlers in  that part, they purchased, and commenced to build their homes. By December,  1836, a goodly number had taken up their residence there and a petition was sent  to the governor asking for a county organization. This petition was granted  about the middle of that month. This organization, and the prospect of a  peaceful habitation, gave impetus to the growth of the “Mormon” colonies, and  the County of Caldwell, as it was called, “grew like Jonah’s gourd.”2

 

The Kirtland Safety Society

 

Affairs in Kirtland had been progressing smoothly for some time, and many  blessings were bestowed upon the people. Such a condition, however, was not to  last. On the 2nd of November, 1836, articles of agreement were prepared for the  organization of the “Kirtland Safety Society Bank.” The State of Ohio, through  prejudice, refused to grant a charter, so the matter rested until January, 1837,  when a society was organized within the provisions of the law. Stock was  subscribed for and the business commenced. During this year (1837) speculation  was at high ebb throughout the entire nation. The Latter-day Saints in Kirtland  partook of that spirit; several business ventures had failed to come up to  expectations, and many of the members of the Church were financially involved.  The authorities of the Church, with others of the leading brethren who had  subscribed for stock in the Kirtland Safety Society, pledged themselves to be  responsible for the redemption of all the notes of the institution, in  proportion to the amount of stock subscribed. Since they had no charter, other  banking institutions refused their notes. The cashier of this society, at one  time the Prophet’s clerk and a faithful elder in the Church, was found guilty of  immoral conduct. He was forgiven on a show of repentance and confession, and  retained his standing in the Church; but he never regained the spirit and  shortly after became disaffected. He misappropriated the funds of the society to  the extent of over twenty-five thousand dollars, which placed the institution in  a precarious condition. Seeing how matters were being conducted, the Prophet  gave a warning which was not heeded; therefore, early in the summer of 1837, he  withdrew from the concern, resigned his office and disposed of all his interests  therein, stating that he was satisfied after five months’ experience, “that no  institution of the kind, established upon just and righteous principles for a  blessing not only to the Church, but to the whole nation, would be suffered to  continue its operations in such an age of darkness, speculation and wickedness.”

 

The Financial Panic of 1837

 

At this time the panic of 1837, swept over the United States. During the months  of March and April, the failures in the City of New York amounted to over  $100,000,000 and hundreds of institutions were driven to the wall. It was only  natural that the Kirtland Safety Society, so improperly managed, should share in  the general condition of failure.

 

Other Causes of Embarrassment

 

Other causes for the financial stress among the Saints, which also weighed  heavily upon the heads of the Church, were the afflictions undergone at the  hands of enemies, and the expenses attached to the erection of the Kirtland  Temple. Moreover, the poor, destitute and needy, who had received the Gospel  came to Kirtland seeking assistance and necessary homes. Large contracts for  land were entered into for the benefit of these poor, that they might obtain  homes to call their own; but those concerned were not always prompt in the  payment of their dues  a common failure of mankind.

 

Apostasy and Sorrow

 

As the fruit of this condition, an apostasy followed rapidly, and it seemed,  said the Prophet, “as though all the powers of earth and hell were combining  their influence in an especial manner to overthrow the Church at once, and make  a final end.” Enemies abroad, aided by apostates within, united in various  schemes to overthrow the Prophet as if he had been the sole cause of all the  evils, not only in the communities of the Church, but throughout the entire  land. Most of this evil which befell the Church might have been avoided if the  Prophet’s counsel had been accepted by the Saints. Apostasy developed within all  the councils of the Church, and many of the leading brethren, who previously had  been true and faithful, were involved.

 

The Pure in Heart Able to Withstand

 

It is strange to think of this dire condition, when just one brief year before,  the glorious manifestations in the temple had been given to many of these men,  who now possessed such bitterness of spirit. They seemed to have forgotten their  many blessings, and the wonderful visions, and the great promises made them by  the Lord, if they would be true and faithful in their ministry. The spirit of  speculation and desire for wealth, during the brief spell of peace and harmony,  had beclouded the minds of many, and their souls were filled with deadly hatred  against their former brethren. Joseph Smith was called a fallen prophet by those  whom he had cherished and loved, and whose love for him had been pronounced.  Some, in their bitterness and darkness of mind, sought his life. Those who  sought his welfare and spoke in his defense, were ridiculed and treated with  great contempt. It was a time when the souls of men were tested, and only those  who kept themselves pure and unspotted from the sins of the world, were able to  withstand the trial. Every influence was brought to bear upon the members of the  Church to get them to renounce the Prophet. Many good men were dragged into the  net; others barely escaped, and only through their deep humility and great  repentance, were they spared the awful fate which carried so many to  destruction. It was during this time at disaffection that Brigham Young, Heber  C. Kimball, Wilford Woodruff, and others, including John Taylor and Willard  Richards, who had but recently joined the Church, stood nobly in defense of the  Prophet Joseph, in the face of a murderous spirit of opposition.

 

The Prophet’s Visit to Missouri

 

In September, 1837, Presidents Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon went to Missouri  to assist the Saints in that land in establishing places of gathering. Other  brethren from Kirtland accompanied them. They arrived about the first of  November in Caldwell County and immediately went into council with the elders  there, regarding locations for the Saints. Those who met in council were Joseph  Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Hyrum Smith, Thomas B. Marsh, William E. McLellin, Lyman  E. Johnson and William Smith from Ohio, and the high council of the Church in  Far West, with William W. Phelps at their head. It was decided that there was  room in that land to make it desirable to invite the Saints from other parts to  locate there. The city Far West, which had been laid out and incorporated, was  chosen as a central gathering place. It was decided to postpone the building of  the Lord’s house in Far West, which had been decided on, until the Lord should  reveal his will to have it commenced.

 

Death of Jerusha Smith

 

A sad event occurred while Hyrum Smith was engaged in Far West assisting the  Saints to locate, in the death of his wife Jerusha Barden Smith, October 3,  1837. “Tell your father when he comes that the Lord has taken your mother home  and left you for him to take care of,” was her dying statement to her five  little children.

 

Attempt to Depose the Prophet

 

Presidents Smith and Rigdon returned to Kirtland from Missouri, on the 10th of  December. They discovered that during their absence, Warren Parrish, John F.  Boynton, Luke S. Johnson, Joseph Coe, Sylvester Smith, and other of the leading  councils had united to overthrow the Church. Some of these men had earlier in  the year shown a spirit of opposition, but on a show of repentance had been  reinstated; but the evils were not fully eradicated from their minds. Warren  Parrish was a seventy, who a few short months before shared the Prophet’s  fullest confidence, as one of his closest and dearest friends. Now, through  transgression, he became one of the Prophet’s bitterest enemies and the leader  of a movement to depose him and install David Whitmer in his stead. Meetings had  been held by this clique in the temple, which they claimed as their own, and  they resorted to violence to maintain their contention. In this manner the  Kirtland Temple, so recently accepted by the Lord, was desecrated and defiled  so that it ceased to be a sacred edifice to his holy name.  The British Mission

 

During these sad days of trial and tribulation, the word of the Lord came to  Joseph Smith stating that something must be done for the salvation of the  Church. The solution was the carrying of the Gospel to Great Britain. On Sunday,  the 4th day of June, the Prophet approached Elder Heber C. Kimball in the  Kirtland Temple and whispered to him, saying: “Brother Heber, the Spirit of the  Lord has whispered to me: ‘Let my servant Heber go to England and proclaim my  Gospel, and open the door of salvation to that nation.’” Brother Kimball,  feeling his weakness, asked if Elder Brigham Young could not go with him. The  Prophet answered that the Lord had something else for Brigham Young to do.  Following this conversation Elder Kimball was set apart for this great work in  the British Isles, which was to be the first foreign mission of the Church.  While the First Presidency were setting Elder Kimball apart, Orson Hyde, of the  council of the twelve came in, and listening to the blessing being given to his  fellow laborer asked that he also might have the privilege of assisting in that  work. Elder Hyde had been among those disturbed because of speculation. His  heart melted within him and he now acknowledged his faults, and sought a  blessing. His offering was accepted and he was set apart for the British labor.

 

The Work in Canada

 

The movement to send elders to Great Britain was the outgrowth of the work in  Canada. Several of the elders had taken trips to Canada and had preached the  Gospel there. Elder Orson Pratt was the first to carry the message into Canada  in the year 1833. In the fall of that same year the Prophet and Sidney Rigdon  went on a brief mission to Upper Canada and made a number of converts. In 1836,  Elder Parley P. Pratt went to the City of Toronto and surrounding country and  preached with wonderful success. It was here at this time that Elder John  Taylor, afterwards of the council of the twelve and later President of the  Church, received the Gospel. It was also here, and due to the preaching of Elder  Pratt, that Joseph Fielding and his two sisters, Mary who a few months later  became the wife of Hyrum Smith and Mercy R., were baptized. Others who received  the Gospel in Canada were John Goodson, John Snyder and Isaac Russell. All of  these people were in correspondence with relatives and friends in Great Britain  whom they informed of the rise and progress of the Church, thus preparing them  for events to come.

 

Departure for Great Britain

 

Elder Willard Richards, having requested the privilege of going to Great  Britain, was set apart by Sidney Rigdon and Hyrum Smith, on the 12th of June,  1837. The following day Elders Heber C. Kimball, Orson Hyde, Willard Richards,  and Joseph Fielding, a priest, who came from Honeydon, England, left Kirtland on  their mission to the British Isles. They were accompanied on their journey as  far as Fairport by Elder Brigham Young and others. This little band of  missionaries was later augmented by the addition of Isaac Russell, John Goodson  and John Snyder, and on the 23rd of June, 1837, they engaged passage on the  merchant ship Garrick, for Liverpool. On the morning of the 20th of July, the  Garrick anchored in the River Mersey. As soon as these brethren landed they went  to Preston, about thirty miles from Liverpool. It was election day for members  of Parliament, and Queen Victoria, who had recently come to the throne, was  about to organize her cabinet. As the missionaries alighted from their coach,  they saw in letters of gold on a banner above their heads an inscription, “Truth  will prevail,” which they accepted as a favorable omen.

 

Elder Joseph Fielding had a brother Rev. James Fielding, who resided in Preston,  and the brethren went to hear him preach on Sunday, July 23, 1837. At the  service Rev. Fielding unexpectedly announced that there were present some  ministers from America and they would occupy his pulpit in the afternoon. The  invitation was joyfully accepted and President Kimball gave a brief address  followed by Elder Hyde. That evening Mr. Fielding again offered his pulpit to  the brethren and Elder Goodson and Brother Fielding preached. This was the  opening of the door for the Gospel in England.3

 

The following Wednesday (July 26, 1837) another meeting was held in Rev. James  Fielding’s chapel. Elders Hyde and Richards preached and much interest was  manifested by the congregation, many were convinced and sought baptism. Fearing  that he would lose his entire flock the Rev. Fielding closed the doors of his  chapel against the elders and from that time opposed the work with all his  power. However, the work was started, a foothold had been gained, and the  brethren received many invitations to preach in private homes. The work spread  rapidly throughout the nation, many branches were organized and many souls  sought salvation through the remission of their sins.

 

Revelation to the Twelve

 

The same day that the Gospel was first preached in England (July 23, 1837) the  Lord gave a revelation through Joseph Smith to Thomas B. Marsh and the twelve.  They were commanded to gird up their loins, take up their cross and follow the  Savior and feed his sheep. “Exalt not yourselves,” said the Lord, “rebel not  against my servant Joseph Smith, for verily I say unto you, I am with him, and  my hand shall be over him; and the keys which I have given unto him, and also to  youward, shall not be taken from him till I come.”

 

This was a timely warning, for even then some of the members of that council  were in secret collusion with enemies of the Church. Their actions later  developed, and before the close of the year they were in open rebellion as  previously indicated.

 

Frederick G. Williams Removed

 

A conference of the elders held in Far West, November 7, 1837, refused to  sustain Frederick G. Williams as a counselor to President Joseph Smith, and  Hyrum Smith was appointed in his place. President Williams, Lyman E. Johnson,  Parley P. Pratt and Warren Parrish had previously been cited to appear before a  council of the Church, charges having been preferred against them, but the  council being improperly organized, no action was taken at that time. President  Williams became disaffected with many others, due to speculations and financial  troubles in the fore part of the year 1837, and permitted himself to become  estranged from the work.

 

Flight of Brigham Young

 

The feeling of opposition against the Prophet became so intense near the close  of the year 1837, that it was with danger that anyone in Kirtland could speak in  his defense. On the morning of December 22, 1837, Elder Brigham Young left  Kirtland because of the fury of the enemies of the Church. Apostates had  threatened to destroy him because he continued to proclaim publicly that Joseph Smith was a prophet of the Most High and had not transgressed and fallen, as the  apostates declared.

 

This was the condition of affairs in Kirtland at the close of the year 1837.

 

Notes

 

1.  The minutes of these meetings and the communications involved in the  question of the removal of the Saints are found in full in the Documentary  History of the Church, vol. 2:448 through 462.

 

2.  The Missourians were willing feeling that the section chosen by the  “Mormons” was of little value.

 

3.  The inspiration of the Prophet Joseph to send elders to Great Britain for  the salvation of the Church, was fully attested, for members were baptized by  the thousands in the course of a few months following. Many of them emigrated  and became stalwarts in the Church, and branches of great magnitude were raised  up in various parts of England.

 

 Chapter 23 The Presidency Move to Missouri. Excommunication of Oliver Cowdery and Others. 1838

Lowering Clouds

 

Threatening and sinister were the clouds which hung over the Church at the  beginning of the year 1838. Apostasy had broken into the ranks, and many of the  former faithful defenders of the truth had fallen by the wayside. Satan  rejoiced, and the enemies of the Saints gained great power, which was later to  be made manifest with extreme bitterness.

 

Flight of Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon

 

So bitter became the spirit of opposition in Kirtland that Joseph Smith and  Sidney Rigdon were forced to seek safety in flight. They departed from that  place January 12, 1838, on horseback, and journeyed towards Far West. Unjust and  vexatious law suits had been planted against them by their enemies. Several  times Joseph had been cited to appear before the courts on trivial charges, from  which he was cleared, which action did not tend to lessen the ugly feelings of  his enemies. Some sixty miles west of Kirtland they tarried at Norton, where  they were joined by their families. On the 16th, the journey was resumed, Elder  Brigham Young accompanying them. At Dublin, in Indiana, the Prophet sought  employment, cutting and sawing wood, to relieve his necessities. Here, through  the aid of Elder Young, a Brother Tomlinson sold some property, and gave the  Prophet three hundred dollars to help him on his way.

 

The weather was extremely cold and the fleeing brethren were forced because of  enemies, to secrete themselves in their wagons without sufficient means to keep  warm. Their adversaries followed them for more than two hundred miles from  Kirtland, with guns and knives, seeking their lives. “They,” wrote the Prophet,  “frequently crossed our track; twice they were in the houses where we stopped,  and once we tarried all night in the same house with them, with only a partition  between us and them; and we heard their oaths and imprecations, and threats  concerning us, if they could catch us; and late in the evening they came into  our room and examined us, but decided we were not the men. At other times we  passed them in the streets, and gazed on them, and they on us, but they knew us  not.” About two hundred and twenty miles from Far West a number of brethren met  the Prophet, and assisted him with teams to that place, where he arrived, March  14, 1838. He was welcomed by the Saints with open arms. President Rigdon did not  arrive in Far West until the 4th of April, having been detained by sickness in  his family.

 

Rejection of the Missouri Presidency

 

The spirit of darkness spread from Kirtland to Missouri, and some of the leading  brethren became affected. Martin Harris was dropped from the high council in  Kirtland, with three others, September 3, 1837, and Oliver Cowdery, who had been  in transgression, was retained in his calling on condition that he would repent;  and should he fail to repent, the Prophet said, “the Church will soon be under  the necessity of raising their hands against him; therefore pray for him.” These  men, and others in Kirtland, influenced some of the brethren in Missouri, and  the spirit of disaffection in Caldwell County commenced to grow. A general  assembly of the Saints was held in Far West, February 4, 1838, and the members  withdrew the hand of fellowship from their presiding officers, David Whitmer,  William W. Phelps and John Whitmer. Similar action was taken on the succeeding  days in Carter’s settlement, Durphy’s home, and Haun’s Mill.

 

The charges against two of them, William W. Phelps and John Whitmer, were that  they had sold their possessions in Jackson County, contrary to the revelations  of the Lord, which was paramount to a denial of the faith; and for the  misappropriation of funds borrowed for the use of the Church. The Lord, in a  revelation, had rebuked these men for their transgression and warned them, but  they did not heed the warning. David Whitmer was likewise charged with improper  conduct and neglect of duty, and with the violation of the word of wisdom, in  the persistent use of tea, coffee and tobacco, and the Church had gone on record  by vote that they would not sustain any officer who indulged in such things.  Thomas B. Marsh and David W. Patten were sustained as presiding officers in  Missouri, until the coming of Presidents Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon. The  three accused men persisted in showing contempt for the decision of these  conferences of the Church, in which action they were joined by Oliver and  Marcellus F. Cowdery; therefore they were cited to appear before the high  council, March 10, 1838, and William W. Phelps and John Whitmer were  excommunicated. Marcellus F. Cowdery was disfellowshipped and the case of David  Whitmer and Oliver Cowdery was held over for future investigation.

 

Political Motto of the Church

 

Shortly after the arrival of Presidents Smith and Rigdon in Far West the  following political motto was adopted:

 

 “The Constitution of our country formed by the fathers of liberty. Peace and  good order in society. Love to God, and good will to man. All good and wholesome  laws, virtue and truth above all things, and aristarchy, live forever! But woe  to tyrants, mobs, aristocracy, anarchy, and toryism, and all those who invent or  seek out unrighteous and vexatious law suits, under the pretext and color of  law, or office, either religious or political. Exalt the standard of democracy;  down with that of priestcraft, and let all the people say, Amen! that the blood  of our fathers may not cry from the ground against us. Sacred is the memory of  the blood which bought for us our liberty.”

 

First General Conference at Far West

 

April 6, 1838, the first general conference of the Church in Missouri was held  at Far West. John Corrill and Elias Higbee were chosen historians and George W.  Robinson general church recorder and clerk of the First Presidency. Thomas B.  Marsh, David W. Patten and Brigham Young were sustained as the presidency of the  Church in Zion. The following day, David W. Patten, in reporting the labors of  the council of the twelve, said he could not recommend William E. McLellin, Luke  S. Johnson, Lyman E. Johnson, John F. Boynton, and was doubtful of William  Smith. The other brethren were faithfully discharging their duties.

 

John Whitmer Withholds the Church Record

 

A demand by letter was made, by sanction of the conference, of John Whitmer, the  former historian, calling for the record of the Church in his keeping. This he  refused to deliver and retained it until the day of his death. A copy of it is  now in the archives of the Church.

 

Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Others Excommunicated

 

Wednesday, April 11, 1838, Seymour Brunson preferred nine charges against Oliver  Cowdery who was cited to appear for trial the following day. Oliver refused to  appear, but sent a letter, written in a very bitter spirit, and defiant  attitude, in which he boasted of his “personal liberty,” and with injured  demeanor denied the right of any church tribunal to control him in his temporal  interests, which was contrary to his constitutional privileges. Therefore he  would voluntarily “withdraw from a society assuming they have such right.” Two  of the charges when presented to the council were rejected and one was  withdrawn, the other six were sustained. There was no other course for the  council to take than to excommunicate the rebellious Assistant President of the  Church, who had turned so bitter in his feelings against his former associates.

 

On the 9th, five charges were also preferred against David Whitmer, who was  cited to appear for trial on the 13th. David also replied by letter, in which he  refused to recognize the authority of the general assemblies of the Church and  the action taken against him; nor would he recognize the authority of the  present council which had been called to try his case. And, since the council  would pursue its “unlawful course at all hazards,” he preferred to withdraw from  their “fellowship and communion choosing to seek a place among the meek and  humble, where the revelations of heaven will be observed, and the rights of men  regarded.” Action was therefore taken against David Whitmer and thus another of  the special witnesses, was cut off from the Church.1

 

Lyman E. Johnson and William E. McLellin

 

The same day charges were preferred against Lyman E. Johnson; these were  sustained, and he was cut off from the Church. One month later, May 11, 1838,  William E. McLellin was handled for his fellowship, and he also lost his  standing in the Church. About this time Jacob Whitmer and Hiram Page also left  the Church having partaken of the spirit of apostasy.

 

A Day of Sadness

 

This was a day of sadness for Joseph Smith. To see the witnesses who were  associated with him in the incipiency of the Church fall by the wayside, touched  his heart. Yet right must prevail, and righteousness triumph, even though it  should cause wounds which could not be healed. To their credit, be it said, that  none of the witnesses who had beheld angels and the plates from which the Book  of Mormon was translated, ever denied their testimony concerning these things,  notwithstanding the extreme bitterness of heart they manifested against Joseph  Smith the Prophet.2

 

Return of Elders Kimball and Hyde

 

April 1, 1838, a conference of the Church was held in Preston, England, in  Temperance Hall (the “Cock Pit”), for the purpose of setting in order the  branches in that mission. Joseph Fielding was sustained as President of the  British Mission, to succeed Heber C. Kimball, and Willard Richards and William  Clayton, an English convert, were chosen as his counselors. These men were  ordained high priests. On the 20th of April, 1838, Elders Kimball and Hyde  sailed from Liverpool for the United States, in the same ship which had carried  them to England, the Garrick. They arrived in Kirtland, May 21, 1838, and  immediately notified the Prophet, at Far West, of their good feeling and  firmness in the faith.

 

Far West. The House of the Lord

 

In a revelation given April 26, 1838, the Lord accepted Far West as a central  gathering place for the Saints in Missouri, and a place of refuge, which should  be holy and consecrated to him. There a house was to be built to his name, and  the beginning should be made on the 4th of July following, then the Saints were  to continue their labors diligently until the house was finished. However, the  presidency, Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon and Hyrum Smith, the latter having taken  the place of Frederick G. Williams, were not to get into debt. Other settlements  in the region round about besides Far West, were to be selected as gathering  places for the Saints, and stakes of Zion were to be established.

 

Stakes of Zion

 

In accordance with the revelation, about the middle of May, 1838, Presidents  Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon with a number of other elders, including David W.  Patten and Bishop Edward Partridge, took a trip in the wilderness north of Far  West for the purpose of locating sites for settlements and the laying off of  stakes of Zion. They pursued their course up Grand River, some twenty-five miles  to a place they called Tower Hill, because they found ruins of an old Nephite  tower there. Here Elder Lyman Wight had his home, and here they camped May 20,  which was the Sabbath day. In the afternoon Presidents Smith and Rigdon, with  their clerk, George W. Robinson, went up the river about one half mile, to  Wight’s ferry, for the purpose of selecting and laying claim to a city plat.  This was in Daviess County, township 60, ranges 27 and 28, which the brethren  called “Spring Hill,” but by the mouth of the Lord, the record states, “it was  named Adam-ondi-Ahman, because, said he, it is the place where Adam shall come  to visit his people, or the Ancient of Days shall sit, as spoken of by Daniel  the Prophet.”3 We are also informed that this is the place where Adam assembled  his posterity three years before his death, and there bestowed upon them his  blessing. On that occasion the Lord appeared to them, and the posterity of Adam  rose up and blessed him, and called him Michael, the Prince, the Arch-angel; and  the Lord administered comfort to Adam, and said unto him: “I have set thee to be  at the head a multitude of nations shall come of thee, and thou art a prince  over them forever.”4 The name of this place was first revealed as early as  March, 1832, but it is evident that the Saints did not know where  Adam-ondi-Ahman was until this visit of these brethren. Adam-ondi-Ahman is  located on the north side of Grand River, in Daviess County, Missouri, about  twenty-five miles north of Far West. It is situated on an elevation, which, said  the Prophet, “renders the place as healthful as any part of the United States.”  It overlooks the river in a wonderfully beautiful location.

 

Other Sites Chosen

 

Other territory, which was unoccupied, was also selected for the gathering of  the Saints, as the Lord had commanded by revelation. The history gives the  following account of the selection of these lands:

 

 “Monday 21. This morning, after making some locations in this place, which is in  township 61, ranges 27 and 28, we returned to Robinson’s Grove, about two miles,  to secure some land near Grand River, which we passed the day previous; and  finding a mistake in the former survey, I sent the surveyor south five or six  miles to obtain a correct line, while some of us tarried to obtain water for the  camp. In the evening I called a council of the brethren to know whether it was  wisdom to go immediately into the north country, or tarry here and hereabouts,  to secure land on Grand River. The brethren spoke their minds freely on the  subject, when I stated to the council that I felt impressed to tarry and secure  all the land near by, that is not secured between this and Far West, especially  on Grand River. President Rigdon concurred, and the council voted unanimously to  secure the land on Grand River, and between this and Far West.”

 

For many days following, the brethren spent their time surveying, selecting  sites for settlements, building houses and preparing for the gathering of the  Saints who were rapidly coming to these parts. In their travels they, at times,  came across antiquities in the form of mounds, which were erected by the  ancestors of the Indians.

 

Independence Day at Far West

 

July 4, 1838, was spent by the Saints in celebrating Independence Day. A  declaration of independence from all mobs and persecutors was declared, and  after a parade the people assembled at the excavation made for the building of  the Lord’s house, and the corner stones of the proposed temple were laid,  agreeable with the commandment of April 26, 1838.5 The southeast corner stone  was laid by Bishop Edward Partridge, assisted by twelve men; and the northeast  corner stone was laid by the teachers, assisted by twelve men. The building was  to be one hundred and ten feet long and eighty feet wide.

 

Sidney Rigdon was the orator of the day, and at the close of these services, the  assembly shouted hosanna, and after singing they adjourned.

 

The Law of Tithing

 

The law of tithing, which was given as a substitute law for consecration, and to  act as a “school-master” to train the Saints, was given July 8, 1838, at Far  West, by revelation. Earlier, as we have discovered, Joseph Smith and Oliver  Cowdery made a covenant that they would give one tenth of all they received, for  the support of the poor. Now the Prophet inquired of the Lord to know what  course should be taken by the Saints, and received the following revelation:

 

 “Verily, thus saith the Lord, I require all their surplus property to be put  into the hands of the Bishop of my Church of Zion, for the building of mine  house, and for the laying of the foundation of Zion and for the Priesthood, and  for the debts of the Presidency of my Church. And this shall be the beginning of  the tithing of my people; and after that, those who have thus been tithed, shall  pay one-tenth of all their interest annually; and this shall be a standing law  unto them forever, for my holy Priesthood, saith the Lord.

 

“Verily, I say unto you, it shall come to pass, that all those who gather unto  the land of Zion shall be tithed of their surplus properties and shall observe  this law, or they shall not be found worthy to abide among you.

 

“And I say unto you, if my people observe not this law, to keep it holy, and by  this law sanctify the land of Zion unto me, that my statutes and my judgments  may be kept thereon, that it may be most holy, behold, verily I say unto you, it  shall not be a land of Zion unto you; and this shall be an ensample unto all the  stakes of Zion; even so, Amen.”

 

It was also made known that the tithing should be disposed of by a council  composed of the First Presidency, Twelve Apostles and Presiding Bishopric.6

 

The Mission of the Twelve

 

On the same day the revelation on tithing was received the Lord also gave a  revelation to the council of the apostles, calling them to the foreign field in  Europe. They were to take their departure from the Saints in Far West on the  26th day of April, 1839, from the building spot of the Lord’s house. How this  revelation was fulfilled at that date, in the midst of murderous opposition will  later be shown. John Taylor, John E. Page, Wilford Woodruff and Willard  Richards, the latter at the time acting as one of the presidency of the British  Mission, were called to the apostleship, to take the places of William E.  McLellin, Luke S. Johnson, John F. Boynton and Lyman E. Johnson, who had fallen.

 

Elders Heber C. Kimball and Orson Hyde, who had recently returned from England,  spoke at the meeting in Far West, Sunday, July 29, 1838, relating their  remarkable experiences in that foreign field. On the 5th of August, at the  meeting, Frederick G. Williams was re-confirmed a member of the Church, he  having been recently re-baptized. He had partaken of the spirit of bitterness  and opposition in Kirtland and through it lost his place as one of the First  Presidency, but had come to Far West seeking fellowship in the Church.

 

The Kirtland Camp

 

A meeting of all the seventies in Kirtland was held in the temple, March 6,  1838, to consider the removal of the Saints to Missouri. The matter was left in  the hands of the presidents and a meeting called for the 10th instant. At this  meeting the presidents reported; they stated that it was doubtful that the  journey could be taken in a body because of the extreme poverty of the people.  The effort of the high council and high priests to get means and remove the  Saints had failed, and they, the seventies, felt that perhaps it would be better  for the journey to be taken as individuals. However, while they were in this  meeting the Spirit of the Lord rested upon them, and it was made known that  they should journey as a body to Zion, according to the commandments and  revelations, pitching their tents by the way, and by doing this they should not  want for any necessity while on their travels.

 

This action having been decided, a constitution for their government on the  journey was drawn up under the supervision of President Hyrum Smith, and  adopted. They were to travel under the direction of the seven presidents, but  organized in companies and divisions, for their guidance and convenience. On the  6th day of July, 1838, the journey was commenced. There were in the camp 529  souls, 256 males, and 273 females, consisting of 105 families. A few others  joined them on the way. In this manner one of the most remarkable migrations  covering a distance of approximately nine hundred miles was undertaken by these  afflicted Saints. The Lord blessed them abundantly on their way. Their  provisions, like the widow’s meal and cruse of oil, were not diminished, and  they were fed miraculously during their journey. As might be expected, there  were among them some who complained, and a few were expelled from the camp to  travel alone because of the infraction of the rules; but the great majority  traveled in humility and obedience. A few died, which brought sorrow to the  camp; some obtained employment among the people of the various settlements  through which they passed, and in this way means were obtained to help them on  the way. After enduring various trials and afflictions, incident to a journey of  this proportion, they arrived at their destination, Far West, October 2, 1838.  There they received a joyful salutation from their brethren. On the 3rd, they  continued their march to Ambrosial Creek and on the 4th near sunset pitched  their tents at the public square of Adam-ondi-Ahman. Thus the Saints from  Kirtland and those scattered abroad began to gather to the settlements in  Missouri: but their peace and happiness were not to remain undisturbed, for the  threatening clouds of mobocracy were already gathering.

 

Notes

 

1.  For full account of these trials see Documentary History of the Church, vol.  3:16 through 20.

 

2.  During these days of darkness all three of the special witnesses of the Book  of Mormon left the Church. So also did three of the eight witnesses, viz. Jacob  Whitmer, John Whitmer and Hiram Page. Christian Whitmer died in full fellowship  and with a strong conviction of the truth, in Missouri, Nov. 27, 1835, and his  brother Peter Whitmer Jr., died September 22, 1836, also firm in the faith and  fellowship of the Saints. Later Oliver Cowdery and Martin Harris returned to the  Church and died in full fellowship, also Luke S. Johnson and many others who  became disaffected during these days of tribulation.

 

3.  Doc. and Cov. Sec. 116. Daniel 7th chapter.

 

4.  Doc. and Cov. Sec. 107: 53 through 55.

 

5.  Doc. and Cov. Sec. 115.

 

6.  See Doc. and Cov. Sec. 119 and 120.

 

 Chapter 24 Difficulties in Missouri. Governor Boggs’ Order of Extermination. 1838

 

Election Day at Gallatin

 

At the election held at Gallatin, Daviess County, Missouri, August 6, 1838,  hostilities between the Missourians and the “Mormons” broke out. This was the  kindling of the flame which was to result in the expulsion of the Latter-day  Saints from that state. The Saints had been warned two weeks before by Judge  Morin, candidate for the state senate, that an attempt would be made to prevent  them from voting; however, they paid little attention to the warning, hoping for  better things. On that day, as a number of the brethren approached the polls,  Col. William P. Peniston, who had led a mob against the Saints in Clay County,  mounted a barrel and harangued the crowd, which he had gathered for the purpose,  against the “Mormons.” He accused their leaders of various vicious crimes and  called the members “dupes, and not too good to take a false oath . . . they  would steal, and he did not consider property safe where they were; that he  opposed their settling in Daviess County, and if they suffered the “Mormons” to  vote, the people would soon lose their suffrage.” Peniston was a candidate for  the legislature, and knowing the brethren would not vote for him, he was  determined to prevent them forcibly from casting their ballots.

 

The result was that a premeditated attack was made upon the little band of  voters. These “Mormons,” about twelve in number, held their ground against a  force of over one hundred. Many heads were broken in the conflict. Elder John L.  Butler, filled with righteous rage, seized a club and knocked men down right and  left. The mobbers disbursed swearing vengeance and threatening to get fire arms  and return. The brethren were persuaded by the election officials to depart to  save further conflict, since this was a prearranged attack, and their enemies  came fully intending to create trouble. The brethren returned to their homes,  collected their families and concealed them in the thickets, while they stood  guard over their homes during the night.

 

The Prophet’s Investigation

 

The next day the report having reached Far West that two or three of the  brethren had been killed and the Missourians would not permit their bodies to be  removed, or interred, Joseph Smith and about fifteen others armed themselves and  started for Gallatin. At Colonel Lyman Wight’s home they learned the correct  status of the affair. On the 8th, some of the brethren called at the home of  Adam Black, justice of the peace and judge elect for Daviess County, and had  some conversation with him in which they asked him if he was their friend or  enemy. While he said some very bitter things against the “Mormons,” he assured  them that he was not in sympathy with the mob, and would not aid them. He was  asked if he would make such a statement in writing, and willingly did so in the  following unique document:

 

 “I, Adam Black, a justice of the Peace of Daviess County do hereby Sertify to  the people coled Mormin, that he is bound to support the Constitution of this  State and of the United States and he is not attached to any mob, or will he  attach himself to any such people, and so long as they will not molest me, I  will not molest them. This the 8th day of August, 1838.

 

“Adam Black.”

 

Peniston’s Affidavit

 

Two days after the interview with Adam Black, William P. Peniston, William  Bowman and others, made affidavit before Judge Austin A. King, stating that the  “Mormons,” to the number of about five hundred men, were armed and collected in  Daviess County, for the purpose, they verily believed, of committing great  violence to the citizens, and to take vengeance for some injuries, or imaginary  injuries, done to some of their friends, and to intimidate and drive from the  country all the old citizens, and possess themselves of their lands, or to force  such as do not leave, to come into their measures and submit to their dictation.  They also stated that about one hundred and twenty men did commit violence on  Adam Black, “by surrounding his house and taking him in a violent manner, and  subjecting him to great indignities, by forcing him, under threats of immediate  death, to sign a paper writing of a very disgraceful character.”

 

Adam Black made affidavit of similar nature on August 28, 1838,1 in this manner  maliciously falsifying and breaking his promise made to the brethren.

 

Effect of These Falsehoods

 

These emissaries of evil knew the effect of their falsehoods would be to stir  the Missourians, who needed very little provocation, to acts of violence against  the “Mormons.” They also hoped, with apparent reason, to win the sympathy of the  officers of the state, especially Governor Lilburn W. Boggs. In fact it is not  so clear that the governor was not secretly aiding them. He had been elected to  the highest office in the state since the disgraceful expulsion of the Saints  from Jackson County, in which he took a very prominent part.

 

Mob Gatherings

 

These evil reports soon spread through other counties, and the people were  informed by many rumors that the “Mormons” were preparing to commit acts of  violence against the older citizens, in other parts of the state. Every  conceivable plan was adopted to provoke the members of the Church to acts of  violence. Their enemies captured prisoners and punished them: then circulated  the report in the “Mormon” settlements that these prisoners had been tortured to  death. Thus they hoped to stir the Saints up to anger, trusting they would seek  revenge that occasion might be found against them as the aggressors; but the  Lord revealed the evil intent of their adversaries.

 

Arrest of Joseph Smith and Lyman Wight

 

Based on these falsehoods of Peniston, Black, et al., charges were preferred  against Joseph Smith and Lyman Wight. At first they objected to being tried in  Daviess County, where the writ was issued, because of the enmity of the citizens  there. After consulting with their attorneys, Atchison and Doniphan, they  volunteered to be tried in Daviess County, before Judge Austin A. King. When the  trial was held, Adam Black was the only witness who appeared against them, and  William P. Peniston was the prosecutor. Several witnesses, both non-members and  members of the Church, testified in their defense. However, the judge, who  manifested a bitter spirit, bound them over in the sum of five hundred dollars.  At the close of the trial he admitted to some of the witnesses that there was no  evidence to warrant his action, but the people demanded it.

 

Proclamation of Governor Boggs

 

These rumors and false affidavits reached the governor, as their authors  intended they should. On the pretext that the “Mormons” had entered into an  alliance with the Indians and were in rebellion, Governor Boggs issued an order,  through Adjutant General B. M. Lisle, to General Atchison and six other  commanders of the militia, that as a “precautionary measure,” an effective force  of the militia be held in readiness to meet either contingency (i.e., the rising  of the Indians or the “Mormons”). This force was to consist of four hundred men  from each of seven divisions, mounted, armed, and equipped as infantry or  riflemen, and formed into companies according to law, thus making a force of  2,800 men.

 

During all this excitement armed forces of the mob were collecting at various  points and making threats against the Saints. Under the direction of the civil  authorities, some of the brethren who were members of the state militia,  intercepted a wagon load of arms and ammunition on the way to a camp of mobbers.  These brethren from Far West took the guns and supplies, arrested three men who  appeared to be in charge, and carried them to Far West. Here the men were  examined before Albert Petty, justice of the peace, and held in bail to appear  at the next term of the circuit court. Judge King was informed of the action  taken and he replied that the prisoners should be turned loose and treated  kindly. What disposition to make of the guns he did not seem to know, but said  they belonged to the militia. Because of this statement, the brethren kept the  guns and distributed them; but later, on the order of General Doniphan, they  were gathered and delivered up to him.

 

Austin’s Mob Force at Diahman

 

False accusations continued to spread and great excitement was manifest on every  hand. The militia, according to the order of Governor Boggs, was mustered into  service. In their ranks were many of the most bitter enemies of the Saints. Near  Diahman a large mob force had gathered under the command of Dr. Austin, armed  and in a threatening mood. General Doniphan, with an equal force of militia  ordered them to disperse. They claimed that they had gathered in self defense,  yet they were besieging the small settlement of “Mormons” at Diahman. Lyman  Wight, who was a colonel in the state militia, had gathered such force as he  could to protect the Saints. At the request of Doniphan he showed a willingness  to disperse, but demanded that the force under Austin do the same. This,  however, the force under Austin refused to do. General Doniphan took up a  position between the mob and the people at Diahman, hoping that in a few days  they would all disband.

 

Siege of De Witt

 

When Austin saw that his purpose to destroy Diahman was foiled he moved his  force to De Witt, in Carroll County, with the determination of expelling the  “Mormons” from that place. The citizens here attempted to defend themselves the  best they could, and Austin thereupon laid siege to the town, firing upon the  inhabitants from time to time, and threatening their extermination or removal  from the state. In the meantime both Atchison and Doniphan, as well as a  committee of citizens from Chariton County, who had come to investigate the  situation, reported to the governor that the “Mormons” were very much alarmed  and entirely on the defensive in this unequal conflict. General Atchison writing  to the governor said: “Things are not so bad in that county as represented by  rumor, and in fact, from affidavits I have no doubt your Excellency has been  deceived by the exaggerated statements of designing or half crazy men. I have  found there is no cause of alarm on account of the ‘Mormons;’ they are not to be  feared; they are very much alarmed.” When the governor received these reports he  seemed very much elated, and replied: “The quarrel is between the ‘Mormons’ and  the mob, and they can fight it out.” Nevertheless, when he discovered that the  “Mormons” were determined to fight it out and maintain their legal and  constitutional rights against such overwhelming odds, he was much incensed,  which later events will show.

 

Defense of De Witt

 

The forces of the Saints at De Witt, under Lieutenant Colonel George M. Hinkle,  who held a commission in the state militia, prepared to defend themselves  against their foes, who had come upon them without warrant or provocation. The  mob forces under Dr. Austin first threatened De Witt, September 21, 1838, in  defiance of all law, and ordered the inhabitants to leave the country by October  first. If they were not gone by that time they were to be exterminated, “without  regard to age or sex.” The following day the citizens of the town petitioned  Governor Boggs for relief against the mob. The governor turned a deaf ear to  all appeals from the Saints, and seemingly failed to heed the expressions of any  but their enemies. The siege of De Witt continued until the 11th of October, in  the presence of state troops, under General Parks and Captain Bogart, a  Methodist preacher, who looked on, but made no effort to interfere.

 

The Prophet Visits De Witt

 

When Joseph Smith learned of the distress of his brethren in De Witt, he paid a  visit to that place. Although the town was under siege by the mob, he risked his  life and slipped past the guards. He found the poor Saints in dire distress;  their provisions were gone, and they had no prospect of obtaining more; their  cattle had been driven off and consumed by their enemies. Again an appeal was  made to the governor, through the services of a number of gentlemen, not members  of the Church, but who understood the situation. This appeal was unheeded. On  the 11th of October the Saints accepted the proposition of the mob, to vacate De  Witt, with the understanding that they were to be recompensed for the loss of  their property. That afternoon they started for Far West, destitute, hungry and  cold. They were emaciated by their long siege; many had died from this abuse;  several more died on the march to Far West, a distance of fifty miles. That they  failed to receive compensation as they were promised, need hardly be mentioned.

 

Other Attacks by the Mob

 

Very much elated over their success at De Witt, the mobbers sought other fields  of conquest. The Rev. Sachiel Woods, a Presbyterian, called the mob together and  informed them that the land sales were coming on, and if they could get the  “Mormons” driven out, they could get all the lands entitled to preemptions, and  to hasten to Daviess County in order to accomplish their object. Moreover, that  the lands purchased by the “Mormons” would again come into their hands, and they  could have both the lands and the money the “Mormons” had paid for them.  Cornelius Gilliam was also busy in Platte and Clinton Counties raising a mob to  aid Woods in this wicked scheme. These mobbers commenced to burn the houses of  the Saints and drive them from their doors, in the midst of a snow storm on the  17th and 18th of October, 1838. Among those who were thus deprived of shelter,  was Agnes M. Smith, wife of Don Carlos Smith who was in the mission field. She  was forced to wade Grand River carrying two small children, in the midst of  inclement winter weather.

 

General Doniphan Orders a Defense

 

General Doniphan ordered out an officer with a force to march to the scene of  trouble at Adam-ondi-Ahman, but these troops were in sympathy with the mob, and  so were sent back by Doniphan, who said they were “damned rotten hearted.” He  then commanded Lieutenant Colonel George M. Hinkle, to organize a force at Far  West, and march them to Diahman, while he would raise a force in Clay and other  counties for the same purpose. At the same time General Parks commanded Col.  Lyman Wight, who held a commission in the 59th regiment, under Parks, to collect  his force at Diahman, which was done. When the mobbers learned of the action of  these troops, they broke their camp and fled. What they could not accomplish by  force, they now hoped to gain by stratagem; therefore they moved the goods from  several of their log huts at Millport and Gallatin and set them on fire. Then  they spread the report in the country round about that the “Mormons” had “riz”  and were burning all before them.2 This action had the desired effect, and mob  forces commenced to gather in various parts of upper Missouri, and prepared for  war. This evil action was augmented by the cunning falsehoods of Samuel Bogart,  Col. William P. Peniston, Dr. Samuel Venable, and many others, who circulated  affidavits of an inflammatory nature, accusing the “Mormons” of all the wicked  deeds committed by the mob. Because of this the Saints in the various  settlements were forced to flee to Far West, seeking protection.

 

Battle of Crooked River

 

Captain Bogart, although a member of the state militia, continued his  depredations against the Saints. On the night of the 24th of October, 1838, this  reverend captain with his force went to the home of Nathan Pinkham and took him  and two other brethren prisoners, together with some horses and arms. The word  reached Far West, and Judge Elias Higbee, the first judge of the County of  Caldwell, ordered Lieutenant Colonel Hinkle, the highest officer in the militia  at Far West, to send out a company to disperse the mobbers and release the  prisoners. The trumpet sounded in the public square about midnight and the  brethren assembled. Captain David W. Patten, was given command of a company and  ordered to go on horseback to the scene of the difficulty. The history of what  occurred is given as follows:

 

 “Fifteen of the company were detached from the main body while sixty continued  their march till they arrived near the ford of Crooked River, where they  dismounted, tied their horses and leaving four or five men to guard them,  proceeded towards the ford, not knowing the location of the encampment. It was  just at the dawning of light in the east, when they were marching quietly along  the road, and near the top of the hill which descends to the river, that the  report of a gun was heard, and young Patrick O’Banion reeled out of the ranks  and fell mortally wounded. Thus the work of death commenced, when Captain Patten  ordered a charge and rushed down the hill on a fast trot, and when within about  fifty yards of the camp formed a line. The mob formed a line under the bank of  the river, below their tents. It was yet so dark that little could be seen by  looking at the west, while the mob looking towards the dawning light, could see  Patten and his men, when they fired a broadside, and three or four of the  brethren fell. Captain Patten ordered the fire returned, which was instantly  obeyed, to great disadvantage in the darkness which yet continued. The fire was  repeated by the mob, and returned by Captain Patten’s company, who gave the  watchword, ‘God and Liberty.’ Captain Patten then ordered a charge, which was  instantly obeyed. The parties immediately came in contact, with their swords,  and the mob were soon put to flight, crossing the river at the ford, and such  places as they could get a chance. In the pursuit, one of the mob fled from  behind a tree, wheeled and shot Captain Patten who instantly fell, mortally  wounded, having received a large ball in his bowels.

 

“The ground was soon cleared, and the brethren gathered up a wagon or two, and  making beds therein of tents, etc., took their wounded and retreated towards Far  West. Three brethren were wounded in the bowels, one in the neck, one in the  shoulder, one through the hips, one through both thighs, one in the arm, all by  musket shot. One had his arm broken by a sword. Brother Gideon Carter was shot  in the head, and left dead on the ground so defaced that the brethren did not  know him. Bogart reported that he had lost one man. The three prisoners were  released and returned with the brethren to Far West. Captain Patten was carried  some of the way in a litter, but it caused so much distress that he begged to be  left by the way side. He was carried into Brother Winchester’s, three miles from  the city of Far West, where he died that night. Patrick O’Banion died soon  after, and Brother Carter’s body was also brought from Crooked River, when it  was discovered who he was.”3

 

The result of this conflict brought sorrow to the Church at Far West. Joseph and  Hyrum Smith and Lyman Wight met the brethren on their return, at Log Creek,  where they did all that could be done for Captain Patten before his death.  “Brother Patten,” said the Prophet, “was a very worthy man, beloved by all good  men who knew him. He was one of the Twelve Apostles, and died as he had lived, a  man of God, and strong in the faith of a glorious resurrection, in a world where  mobs will have no power or place. One of his last expressions to his wife  was ‘what ever you do else, O do not deny the faith.’ How different his fate to  that of the apostate, Thomas B. Marsh, who this day vented all the lying spleen  and malice of his heart towards the work of God, in a letter to Brother and  Sister Abbot, to which was annexed an addendum by Orson Hyde.” The funeral of  Brothers Patten and O’Banion was held at Far West, Saturday, October 27, 1838.  On that occasion the Prophet said of Elder Patten: “There lies a man that has  done just as he said he would he has laid down his life for his friends.”

 

Apostasy of Thomas B. Marsh

 

Thomas B. Marsh, President of the council of the Twelve Apostles, suddenly left  Far West in October, 1838, and went to Richmond in an ugly mood. He had been  offended over a trivial matter and thereupon left the Church and made false  accusations against his former brethren. Orson Hyde, in the same spirit,  followed him on the 18th of October. On the 24th, Marsh went before Henry  Jacobs, justice of the peace at Richmond, and made an affidavit the gist of  which is as follows:

 

 “They have among them a company, considered true ‘Mormons,’ called the Danites,  who have taken an oath to support the heads of the Church in all things that  they say or do, whether right or wrong. Many, however, of this band are much  dissatisfied with this oath, as being against moral and religious principles. On  Saturday last, I am informed by the ‘Mormons,’ that they had a meeting at Far  West at which they appointed a company of twelve, by the name of the  ‘Destruction Company,’ for the purpose of burning and destroying, and that if  the people of Buncombe came to do mischief upon the people of Caldwell, and  committed depredations upon the ‘Mormons,’ they were to burn Buncombe; and if  the people of Clay and Ray made any movement against them, this destroying  company were to burn Liberty and Richmond. . .  . The Prophet inculcates the  notion, and it is believed by every true ‘Mormon,’ that Smith’s prophecies are  superior to the laws of the land. I have heard the Prophet say that he would yet  tread down his enemies, and walk over their dead bodies; and if he was not let  alone, he would be a second Mohammed to this generation, and that he would make  it one gore of blood from the Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic Ocean; that like  Mohammed, whose motto in treating for peace was, ‘the Alcoran or the Sword;’ so  should it be eventually with us, ‘Joseph Smith or the Sword.’ These last  statements were made during the last summer. The number of armed men at  Adam-ondi-Ahman was between three and four hundred.

 

“Thomas B. Marsh.”

 

“Sworn to and subscribed before me, the day herein written.

 

“Henry Jacobs, J. P., “Ray County, Missouri.”

 

 

 

 “Richmond, Missouri, October 24, 1838.”

 

“Affidavit of Orson Hyde”

 

“The most of the statements in the foregoing disclosure I know to be true; the  remainder I believe to be true.

 

“Orson Hyde.”

 

 

 

 “Richmond, October 24, 1838.”

 

“Sworn to and subscribed before me, on the day above written.

 

“Henry Jacobs, J. P.”4

 

General Atchison’s Report to Boggs

 

After the expulsion of the Saints from DeWitt, General Atchison reported the  condition to Governor Boggs. He informed him that the mob was on the way to  Daviess County to continue their ravages, “where it is thought,” said the  general in his communication, “the same lawless game is to be played over, and  the ‘Mormons’ to be driven from that county, and probably from Caldwell County.  Nothing, in my opinion, but the strongest measures within the power of the  executive, will put down this spirit of mobocracy.” Again, showing the spirit of  disapproval of the course taken by the officials in the state, he wrote the  governor and said: “I do not feel disposed to disgrace myself, or permit the  troops under my command to disgrace the state and themselves by acting the part  of a mob. If the ‘Mormons’ are to be driven from their homes, let it be done  without any color of law, and in open defiance thereof; let it be done by  volunteers acting upon their own responsibilities!” This was evidently intended  as a rebuke, but it and other reports of like character were entirely ignored by  Governor Boggs, who remained true to his colors as the advocate of mob rule.

 

Evil Reports

 

Governor Boggs preferred to believe or more correctly, accepted contrary to his  knowledge the evil reports which flooded his office from the enemies of the  Saints. In reporting to the governor the siege of DeWitt, General Samuel D.  Lucas, referred to the Saints as “base and degraded beings,” who would be  exterminated if they dared to kill one of the mobbers besieging them; for such  was the hatred of the people. Lucas was one of the most bitter of the enemies of  the Church. Reverend Sashiel Woods and Joseph Dickson, October 24, 1838,  reported to the governor that “Captain Bogart and all his company, amounting to  between fifty and sixty men, were massacred by the ‘Mormons’ at Buncombe, twelve  miles north of Richmond, except three.” This false report was made about the  time of the battle of Crooked River; and they added that it might be relied on  as being true that the “Mormons” expected to lay Richmond in ashes that very  morning. Their fiendish appeal ended with these words: “We know not the hour or  minute we will be laid in ashes  our country is ruined for God’s sake give us  assistance as quick as possible!” This was sent from Carrolton. Similar reports  were sent by Amos Rees, formerly attorney for the Church in the Jackson trouble,  and Wiley C. Williams, mobocrat, in a communication to Judge Ryland. Judge  Ryland answered and said:

 

 “Since Mr. Morehead left Richmond, one of the company (Bogart’s) has come in and  reported that there were ten of his comrades killed, and the remainder were  taken prisoners, after many of them had been severely wounded; he stated further  that Richmond would be sacked and burned by the “Mormon” banditti tonight.  Nothing can exceed the consternation which this news gave rise to. The women and  children are flying from Richmond in every direction. . . . My impression is,  that you had better send one of your number to Howard, Cooper and Boone  counties, in order that volunteers may be getting ready.  . . . They must make  haste and put a stop to the devastation which is menaced by these infuriated  fanatics, and they must go prepared and with the full determination to  exterminate or expel them from the state en masse. Nothing but this can give  tranquility to the public mind, and re-establish the supremacy of the laws.  There must be no further delaying with this question anywhere. The ‘Mormons’  must leave the state, or we will, one and all, and to this complexion it must  come at last” (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 3:172).

 

The Saints had no thought of making any attack on Richmond or any other place.  This Judge Ryland must have known; but he evidently had become drunken with the  bitter spirit of the times. His very letter refutes the falsehoods contained  therein.

 

Atchison’s False Report

 

Even General David R. Atchison, who previously had shown a spirit of justice and  fair play, was overcome by the lying spirits abroad in the land. He permitted  himself, under date of October 28, 1838, after the battle of Crooked River, to  join that evil genius, Samuel D. Lucas, in a false report to Governor Boggs, as  follows:

 

 “Sir: From late outrages committed by the Mormons, civil war is inevitable. They  have set the laws of the country at defiance, and are in open rebellion. We have  about two thousand men under arms to keep them in check. The presence of the  commander-in-chief is deemed absolutely necessary, and we most respectfully urge  that your excellency be at the seat of war as soon as possible.”

 

“Your most obedient servants,”

 

“David R. Atchison, M. G. 3rd Div.”  “Samuel D. Lucas, M. G. 4th Div.”

 

The surprising thing is that General Atchison would permit his name to be  attached to such a document as this, which both these officers knew perfectly  well was not true. But good men are at times overcome. Apparently he could not  stand the pressure of the consolidated effort against the Saints, who were  seeking merely to defend themselves and their rights against the aggressions of  mobocracy. Nevertheless it appeared to be a capital offense for a weak and  practically defenseless people to resist such invasion. For doing so they were  guilty of causing a state of civil war!

 

General Atchison’s conscience must have troubled him for thus yielding to the  mob spirit, for, later, because he manifested a spirit of fairness towards the  Saints, he was “dismounted” by the governor, and relieved of his command.

 

Boggs’ Order to Clark

 

October 25, 1838, the Governor issued orders to General John B. Clark to raise  sufficient troops to reinstate the inhabitants of Daviess County on their  possessions, for, said he: “they [the “Mormons”] have burnt to ashes the towns  of Gallatin and Millport in said county; the former being the county seat of  said county, and including the clerk’s office and all the public records of the  county, and that there is not now a civil officer within said county.” Two  thousand men were to be raised, in addition to those already under arms, to  “restore” these people, who had not been molested, in these towns.

 

The Order of Extermination

 

This first order to General Clark was followed by another the following day, the  report of the battle of Crooked River having reached the ear of the governor.  When he discovered that the “Mormons” were attempting to “fight it out,” he had  a great change of heart and issued his disgraceful “exterminating order,” the  greatest blot on the escutcheon of the state of Missouri. Others among the mob,  and even officers of lesser dignity, had hinted at such a thing; but it remained  for Lilburn W. Boggs, governor of the state of Missouri, without provocation or  due investigation, to issue by authority of the great office which he held, to  the militia of that commonwealth, an order to exterminate or drive from Missouri  twelve thousand defenseless citizens who had done no wrong. And the execution of  this shameful and wicked order was to be carried out in the dead of winter,  which would bring to pass exposure and death of delicate women and innocent  children, against whom there could have been no charge.5

 

A Match to the Flame

 

The Governor’s order soon became generally known and the mobbers looked upon it,  as well they might, as an approval of their unlawful course. Great excitement  prevailed, and mobs assembled on every side. Marauders sallied forth, burning  houses, driving off cattle, destroying property, ravishing women and threatening  with death any who dared resist their fiendish deeds.

 

Notes

 

1. For the Prophet’s reply to these charges see  Documentary History of the  Church, vol. 3:70.

 

2. These houses really belonged to the Latter-day Saints who had purchased them  but had not taken possession.

 

3. Documentary History of the Church, vol. 3:170  through 1.

 

 4. Orson Hyde returned to the body of the Church in June, 1839, at Commerce  (Nauvoo) Illinois, and on the 27th of that month was reinstated in the council  of the twelve. He was repentant, and in tears of humility begged forgiveness  from his brethren for the unfortunate part he had taken in this lying report  with Thomas B. Marsh. He had been overcome by the spirit of darkness and had  borne false witness against his brethren while under that influence. After his  return to the Church, he faithfully performed his part to the end. It was Orson  Hyde, who, in the life time of Joseph Smith, was intrusted with the important  mission of dedicating the land of Palestine for the return of the Jews. The  consciousness of his guilt in this unfortunate act in Missouri, preyed upon his  mind all his life, and many were the days he shed bitter tears because that  chapter in his history could not be blotted out.

 

Thomas B. Marsh, at a later day (1857), also returned to the Church. On the 4th  of September, 1857, he arrived in Salt Lake City with the immigrants of William  Walker’s company. He had crossed the plains from Harrison County, Mo. Two days  after his arrival he addressed a congregation in the tabernacle and in his  remarks said: “I can say, in reference to the quorum of the twelve, to which I  belonged, that I did not consider myself a whit behind any of them, and I  suppose that others had the same opinion; but let no one feel too secure; for  before you think of it, your steps will slide. You will not then think nor feel  for a moment as you did before you lost the Spirit of Christ; for when men  apostatize, they are left to grovel in the dark. . . . But let me tell you, my  brethren and friends, if you do not want to suffer in body and mind, as I have  done; if there are any of you that have the seeds of apostasy in you, do not let  them make their appearance, but nip that spirit in the bud; for it is misery and  affliction in this world, and destruction in the world to come” (Deseret News,  Sept. 16, 1857). He was a broken man in health and spirit and showed that the  hand of affliction had been over him. “If you want to see the fruits of  apostasy,” he would say, “look at me!” He was later ordained a high priest.

 

The shadow of color for the report made by Thomas B. Marsh and Orson Hyde, was  in the fact that a Dr. Sampson Avard, who had shortly before joined the Church,  did organize a band which he called “Danites.” These Danites did subscribe to  some oath of vengeance on their enemies. However, as soon as Joseph Smith  discovered what was going on, he put a stop to it and Avard was excommunicated.

 

 5. The exterminating order of Governor Boggs to General Clark is as follows:

 

 “Sir: Since the order of the morning to you, directing you to cause four hundred  mounted men to be raised within your division, I have received by Amos Rees,  Esq., and Wiley C. Williams, Esq., one of my aids, information of the most  appalling character, which changes the whole face of things, and places the  Mormons in the attitude of open and avowed defiance of the laws, and of having  made open war upon the people of this state. Your orders are, therefore, to  hasten your operations and endeavor to reach Richmond, in Ray County, with all  possible speed. The Mormons must be treated as enemies and must be exterminated  or driven from the state, if necessary for the public good. Their outrages are  beyond all description. If you can increase your force, you are authorized to do  so, to any extent you may think necessary. I have just issued orders to  Major-General Wallock, of Marion County, to raise five hundred men, and to march  them to the northern part of Daviess and there to unite with General Doniphan,  of Clay, who has been ordered with five hundred men to proceed to the same point  for the purpose of intercepting the retreat of the Mormons to the north. They  have been directed to communicate with you by express; and you can also  communicate with them if you find it necessary. Instead, therefore, of  proceeding as at first directed, to reinstate the citizens of Daviess in their  homes, you will proceed immediately to Richmond, and there operate against the  Mormons. Brigadier-General Parks, of Ray, has been ordered to have four hundred  men of his brigade in readiness to join you at Richmond. The whole force will be  placed under your command.

 

 “L. W. Boggs,”  “Governor and Commander-in-Chief.”

 

 “To General Clark.”

 

 Chapter 25  Persecutions of the Saints. 1838

 

Clark’s Fitness for His Job

 

General John B. Clark was a resident of Jackson County. So was General Samuel D.  Lucas. Both assisted in driving the “Mormons” from that county in 1833. Governor  Lilburn W. Boggs was also from Jackson, and aided in that expulsion. At that  time he was lieutenant governor, and worked secretly. These three men hated the  Latter-day Saints with a mortal hate. General Clark was not the ranking officer  in the state militia in 1838, but Boggs knew, from former experiences, whom to  depend upon to execute his dastardly job. Few of the other generals, though  several of them disliked the “Mormons,” could debase themselves enough to reach  the level required to execute the governor’s inhuman decree. Clark, who received  the command, and Lucas who assisted him, were the two most fitted to carry out  the order of extermination.

 

The Haun’s Mill Massacre

 

There were a great many petty officers, and some sectarian priests, who could  descend to any level. Human butchery, if “Mormons” were the victims, was to them  but a recreation. Such a man was Col. William O. Jennings, of the state militia.  Another was Captain Nehemiah Comstock, who served under Jennings. These “brave”  men with an armed force of characters like themselves all from the state troops   were assembled, at the close of the month of October, 1838, near a small  settlement of the Saints at Haun’s Mill, on Shoal Creek, about twelve miles due  east of Far West. On the 28th day of that month, a Sunday, Jennings approached  the settlement and proposed a treaty of peace. The members of the Church located  there, who were quietly minding their own business, knew not, when they were at  peace, why they should be called on to enter into such an agreement. However,  knowing the status of affairs throughout upper Missouri, they gladly entered  into such a treaty, and continued with their domestic affairs, feeling perfectly  secure. In the meantime Col. Ashley had informed Col. Jennings of the governor’s  order of extermination. Thereupon Jennings and Nehemiah Comstock gathered their  forces, about two hundred and forty men, and immediately started for Haun’s  Mill.

 

Monday, October 29, 1838, passed in peace and quiet. Tuesday the 30th was clear  and pleasant, an Indian summer day. In the afternoon, the Saints were engaged in  their daily pursuits, the men in the fields and the shops; the women attending  to domestic duties, and the children playing on the banks of the creek. Suddenly  Jennings and his force approached at full speed, riding upon the settlement.  David Evans, perceiving their evil intentions, raised his hands as a sign of  peace; but they heeded him not. Continuing their advance, they commenced to  fire. The stricken people fled, seeking shelter and endeavoring to escape. Some  fled into the thickets near their homes, and by this means escaped. For lack of  time and want of a better protection, several of the men and boys rushed into  the blacksmith shop. The cracks between the logs of the shop were so wide that  the fiends on the outside could see their victims within. Surrounding the place,  they poured volley after volley through the cracks with deadly effect. Several  intended victims rushed from the shop amidst the fire of the mob; some escaped  to the thicket; others were shot. Miss Mary Steadwell, while fleeing, was shot  in the hand and fainted; falling over a log she remained protected by it. After  the work of destruction was over, more than twenty musket balls were discovered  in the log. Yet the executioners were principally seeking for the men, and let  most of the women escape.

 

After completing all the execution possible on the outside of the shop, the  ruffians pushed through the door and finished their bloody work. The terrible  scene enacted there was one of the utmost brutality. It is told in the “History  of Caldwell County,” Missouri, with such excuses for the attack as the writers  of such a history could employ. Nevertheless the diabolical deeds of these  members of the state militia, are partly related as follows:

 

 “Esq. Thomas McBride was an old soldier of the Revolution. He was lying wounded  and helpless, his gun by his side. A militiaman named Rogers came up to him and  demanded it. “Take it,” said McBride. Rogers picked up the weapon, and finding  that it was loaded, deliberately discharged it into the old man’s breast. He  then cut and hacked the old veteran’s body with a rude sword, or corn knife,  until it was frightfully mangled. Wm. Reynolds, a Livingston County man, killed  the little boy Sardius Smith, 10 years of age. The lad had run into the  blacksmith shop and crawled under the bellows for safety. Upon entering the  shop the cruel militiaman discovered the cowering, trembling little fellow, and  without even demanding his surrender, fired upon and killed him, and afterwards  boasted of the atrocious deed to Charles R. Ross and others. He described, with  fiendish glee, how the poor boy struggled in his dying agony, and justified his  savage and inhuman conduct in killing a mere child by saying, ‘Nits will make  lice, and if he had lived he would have been a Mormon.’”

 

The names of those killed are as follows: Thomas McBride, Levi N. Merrick, Elias  Benner, Josiah Fuller, Benjamin Lewis, Alexander Campbell, Warren Smith, George  S. Richards, William Napier, Austin Hammer, Simeon Cox, Hiram Abbott, John York,  John Lee, John Byers, Sardius Smith and Charles Merrick. Some of these were mere  children. Many others were severely wounded but managed to escape with their  lives, among them a boy, Alma Smith, who had the flesh of his hip shot away. He  had the presence of mind to lie perfectly still and the fiends thought he was  dead. Alma was miraculously healed through prayer and faith.

 

After this terrible work the murderers proceeded to rob the houses, wagons and  tents, and left the widows and children who escaped destitute of the necessities  of life. They even stripped the bodies of the slain, and carried off their  booty, shouting in fiendish glee and boasting of their deeds of blood, as though  they were deeds of valor, worthy of the greatest praise and honor.

 

Gathering of the Mob-Militia

 

The same day of the massacre at Haun’s Mill, General Samuel D. Lucas, in command  of two thousand men, arrived at Far West. With him were Brigadier Generals  Doniphan, Parks, Graham and Wilson, the latter another ruffian. General Clark  was at Chariton, under a forced march, with the governor’s exterminating order  and a force of about one thousand men.

 

As the troops approached Far West towards the evening of that day, they formed  in double file about one half mile from the city. With a flag of truce they sent  messengers to the city. They were met by Captain Morey, with a few other  individuals, who desired to know what the gathering of the large armed force  could mean, for as yet the “Mormon” people had not learned of the Boggs  exterminating order. To their horror they were told that the body of troops were  state militia, ordered there by the governor, to exterminate the people and burn  the place. They demanded three persons in Far West, Adam Lightner, a  non-“Mormon,” John Cleminson, who had lost the faith, and his wife, to be  brought to them. When these three came out, the messengers told them to leave  Far West at once and save their lives, for they would be protected. The  determination of the force of militia was to destroy Far West and kill the  inhabitants. All three nobly said if the people were to be destroyed they would  return and die with them. The officers immediately returned to the camp.

 

Charles C. Rich was then dispatched with a flag of truce toward the camp of  militia to have an interview with Generals Atchison and Doniphan, who in the  past had shown some sympathy for the “Mormons.” On his way he was fired at by  Captain Bogart. Nevertheless, he continued on his way and was granted the  interview with Doniphan, who informed him that General Atchison had been  “dismounted” a few miles back, by order of the governor, for being too merciful  to the “Mormons.” He then plead with Doniphan to use his influence to protect  the city from an attack, at least until the following morning. Doniphan replied  that the governor had ordered the extermination of the “Mormons,” but his order  had not arrived, and until it did there would be no attack upon the Saints.  However, he could not vouch for the action of Cornelius Gilliam’s company, which  had just arrived, painted and decorated as Indians; their commander styling  himself the “Delaware Chief.” These savages spent the night in making hideous  yells and other disturbances. When Charles C. Rich returned to Far West and  reported, Col. George M. Hinkle, who commanded the forces at Far West, sent  another messenger to the mob-militia to plead for the lives of the people. He  returned without a satisfactory answer and reported that he had learned that  several members of the Church had been captured by some of the troops, and had  been brutally murdered, with no one to raise a voice in protest.

 

During the night the Saints made such temporary fortification as they were able  and with grim determination prepared to fight the best they could to the last,  being outnumbered more than five to one. Recruits were hourly joining the forces  of their enemies. Among these came Col. Jennings and his band, fresh from the  great “victory” at Haun’s Mill. The Saints spent an anxious night in solemn  supplication to the Lord. The women gathered such few loose articles as might be  carried, and prepared for flight if the chance was offered them. Lyman Wight,  with a small force, came from Adam-ondi-Ahman and succeeded in gaining Far West  during the night.

 

The Siege of Far West

 

Early on the morning of the 31st, Col. Hinkle sent another messenger to General  Doniphan. When he returned he stated that Doniphan had said that the governor’s  order had arrived and Lucas was preparing to carry it out. “He would be damned,  if he would obey the order,” was the report, “but Lucas could do as he pleased.”

 

The army, while encamped, permitted no person to go out or come in the city.  Those who attempted it were shot at. Corn fields were destroyed and cattle,  sheep and hogs wantonly killed by members of the mob-militia.

 

Colonel Hinkle’s Treachery

 

About eight o’clock Col. Hinkle sought another interview, this time with General  Lucas, to learn if some compromise could not be arranged to avoid a battle.  Lucas promised to meet him with a flag of truce at two o’clock. At the time  appointed the interview was held. Hinkle, John Corrill, who had within the past  few weeks become disaffected, William W. Phelps and a Captain Morrison, met with  Lucas and his aids when the following propositions were presented to Col. Hinkle  for acceptance in behalf of the “Mormons:”

 

  “To give up their leaders to be tried and punished.

 

   “To make an appropriation of their property, all who had taken up arms, to the    payment of their debts and indemnity for damage done by them.

 

   “That the balance should leave the state, and be protected out by the militia,    but to be permitted to remain under protection until further orders were    received from the Commander-in-Chief.

 

   “To give up the arms of every description, to be receipted for.”

 

 At least, these were the terms according to the report Lucas made to Governor  Boggs. What else he may have said is not on record. To these terms Col. Hinkle  agreed, but asked to be given until the next day to comply with them. Lucas  consented to this on the condition that Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Lyman  Wight, Parley P. Pratt and George W. Robinson be turned over to the camp of the  militia as hostages. If in the morning Hinkle failed to comply with the terms,  these men would be returned to Far West, and the attack should commence on the  city. If he did comply, then these brethren, among others, should be retained as  prisoners to be tried. Hinkle returned to Far West and reported to Joseph Smith  that the officers of the state militia desired an interview with the brethren  mentioned, hoping that the difficulties might be settled without carrying out  the exterminating order. Said Parley P. Pratt: “We had no confidence in the word  of a murderer and robber; but there was no alternative, but to put ourselves  into the hands of such monsters, or to have the city sacked, and men, women and  children massacred. We therefore commended ourselves to the Lord, and  voluntarily surrendered.” As they approached the camp in compliance with this  order, General Lucas, with a guard of several hundred men, rode up, and with a  haughty air ordered his men to surround the brethren. Colonel Hinkle was heard  to say: “General, these are the prisoners I agreed to deliver up.” The prisoners  were then marched into the camp surrounded by several thousand savage looking  soldiers. “These all set up a constant yell,” says Brother Pratt, “like so many  bloodhounds let loose upon their prey. . . . If the vision of the infernal  regions could suddenly be opened to the mind, with thousands of malicious  fiends, all clamoring, exulting, deriding, blaspheming, mocking, railing, raging  and foaming like a troubled sea, then could some idea be formed of the hell  which we had entered.”

 

The prisoners were placed under a strong guard and forced to remain without  shelter during the night in inclement winter weather. The guard blasphemed;  mocked the Savior; demanded miracles and said: “Come, Smith, show us an angel;  give us one of your revelations; show us a miracle; come, there is one of your  brethren in camp whom we took prisoner yesterday in his own house, and knocked  his brains out with his own rifle, which we found hanging over his fire place;  he lies speechless and dying;1 speak the word and heal him, and then we will all  believe; or, if you are apostles or men of God deliver yourselves, and then we  will be “Mormons.”2

 

Condemned to be Shot

 

Thursday morning, November 1, 1838, Hyrum Smith and Amasa Lyman were brought by  Col. Hinkle into the camp. That night a court martial was held, at which,  besides the commanding officers of the mob-militia, Col. Hinkle, Judge Austin A.  King, District Attorney Birch, and the Reverends Sashiel Woods, Bogart and  several other priests, played a part. The prisoners were sentenced to be shot on  the public square in Far West, Friday morning at 9 o’clock. This was, let it be  said to their honor, over the protest of Generals Doniphan and Graham, and  perhaps a few others. General Doniphan was given the order to carry out the  execution. It was a most fortunate thing that he was selected, for he refused to  obey the command. The order given him was as follows:

 

 “Brigadier General Doniphan:

 

“Sir: You will take Joseph Smith and the other prisoners into the public square  of Far West, and shoot them at 9 o’clock tomorrow morning.”

 

“Samuel D. Lucas,”  “Major General Commanding.”

 

General Doniphan replied to this order by saying to his superior:

 

 “It is cold blooded murder. I will not obey your order. My brigade shall march  for Liberty tomorrow morning at 8 o’clock; and if you execute these men, I will  hold you responsible before an earthly tribunal, so help me God.”

 

“A. W. Doniphan,”  “Brigadier General.”

 

Although this was an act of insubordination, it frightened the criminal general  and his willing aids. No charge was ever made against Doniphan, for they dared  not make one.

 

Plundering of the Militia

 

Col. Hinkle, according to his agreement, marched the militia companies at Far  West out of the city and grounded their arms, which were the private property of  the men who held them. Then the mob force was let loose. They entered the city  without restraint, on pretext of searching the homes for additional arms. They  tore up floors; ruined furniture; destroyed property; whipped the men and forced  them to sign deeds to their property at the point of the bayonet; and violated  the chastity of women, until their victims died. About eighty men were taken  prisoners and the people were ordered to leave the state, and were forbidden,  under threat of death, to assemble more than three in a place. Notwithstanding  all this, General Lucas reported to the governor how orderly and decorous were  his troops.

 

Prisoners Taken to Independence

 

The prisoners after an earnest appeal, were permitted to visit their homes,  under a strong guard, to obtain a change of clothing. They were, however, given  strict command not to speak, or enter into conversation with the members of  their families. When the Prophet visited his home the children clung to his  garments. He requested the privilege of a private interview with his family,  which was denied him. Hyrum Smith, whose wife less than two weeks later was  confined,3 drew attention to the condition in his home; but received in answer  only gibes and insults. Parley P. Pratt underwent a similar scene, and in the  anguish of his soul appealed to General Moses Wilson, who answered him with an  exultant laugh, and a taunting reproach.

 

After these painful scenes, the prisoners were started for Independence, under a  strong guard commanded by Generals Lucas and Wilson. On the way orders came from  General Clark to have the prisoners sent to him, but this General Lucas was not  willing to do. Clark, without question, wanted the honor of putting the  prisoners to death. Through his vanity, Lucas wanted to exhibit them before  their enemies in Jackson County, and pose as a great hero in triumph. Between  the rivalry of the two, not forgetting the hand of the Lord which was over them,  their lives were spared.4

 

Prisoners in Richmond

 

On the 3rd of November, 1838, the prisoners arrived in Jackson County and the  next day were taken by order of General Lucas, to Independence. General Clark,  however, would not permit them to stay, desiring to gain possession of them  himself. Therefore, he sent Col. Sterling Price with instructions to have them  removed immediately to Richmond, Ray County. They arrived in Richmond on the  9th, and were imprisoned in a vacant house. On their way they met General Clark,  and asked him why they had been carried from their homes and what the charges  were against them. Clark said he was not then able to determine, but would be  prepared to tell in a short time. When they were confined Clark sent Price with  two chains and padlocks and had the prisoners fastened together. The windows  were then nailed down; the prisoners were searched and the only weapons they had  (their pocket knives) were taken away. While this was going on armed guards  stood with cocked guns pointed at them. Here the brethren were kept many days  awaiting trial.

 

Rebuking the Guards

 

While incarcerated in this prison, the brethren were guarded by some of the  vilest wretches that could be found, who spent their time in the presence of  their prisoners relating their horrible deeds of wickedness. This thing  continued for some time, when the Prophet, unable to stand it any longer, arose  and rebuked them. The occurrence is graphically related by Elder Parley P. Pratt  in the following words:

 

 “During this time Elder Rigdon was taken very sick, from hardship and exposure,  and finally lost his reason; but still he was kept in a miserable, noisy and  cold room, and compelled to sleep on the floor with a chain and padlock round  his ankle, and fastened to six others. Here he endured the constant noise and  confusion of an unruly guard, the officer of which was Colonel Sterling Price,  since governor of the State.

 

“These guards were composed generally of the most noisy, foul-mouthed, vulgar,  disgraceful rabble that ever defiled the earth. . . . Mrs. Robinson, a young and  delicate female, with her infant, came down to see her husband [George W.  Robinson], and to comfort and take care of her father [Sidney Rigdon] in his  sickness. When she first entered the room, amid the clank of chains and the  rattle of weapons, and cast her eyes on her sick and dejected parent and  sorrow-worn husband, she was speechless, and only gave vent to her feelings in  a flood of tears. This faithful lady, with her little infant, continued by the  side of her father till he recovered from his sickness, and till his fevered and  disordered mind resumed its wonted powers.

 

“In one of those tedious nights we had lain as if in sleep till the hour of  midnight had passed, and our ears and hearts had been pained, while we had  listened for hours to the obscene jests, the horrid oaths, the dreadful  blasphemies and filthy language of our guards, Colonel Price at their head, as  they recounted to each other their deeds of rapine, murder, robbery, etc., which  they had committed among the ‘Mormons’ while at Far West and vicinity. They even  boasted of defiling by force wives, daughters, and virgins, and of shooting or  dashing out the brains of men, women and children.

 

“I had listened till I became so disgusted, shocked, horrified, and so filled  with the spirit of indignant justice that I could scarcely refrain from rising  upon my feet and rebuking the guards; but had said nothing to Joseph, or any one  else, although I lay next to him and knew he was awake. On a sudden he arose to  his feet, and spoke in a voice of thunder, or as the roaring lion, uttering, as  near as I can recollect, the following words:

 

“SILENCE, ye fiends of the infernal pit. In the name of Jesus Christ I rebuke  you, and command you to be still. I will not live another minute and hear such  language. Cease such talk, or you or I die THIS INSTANT!

 

Majesty in Chains

 

 “He ceased to speak. He stood erect in terrible majesty. Chained, and without a  weapon; calm, unruffled and dignified as an angel, he looked upon the quailing  guards; whose weapons were lowered or dropped to the ground, whose knees smote  together, and who, shrinking into a corner, or crouching at his feet, begged his  pardon, and remained quiet till a change of guards.

 

“I have seen the ministers of justice, clothed in magisterial robes, and  criminals arraigned before them, while life was suspended on a breath, in the  courts of England; I have witnessed a Congress in solemn session to give laws to  nations; I have tried to conceive of kings, of royal courts, of thrones and  crowns; and of emperors assembled to decide the fate of kingdoms; but dignity  and majesty have I seen but once, as it stood in chains, at midnight, in a  dungeon in an obscure village of Missouri.”5

 

General Clark at Far West

 

In the meantime (November 4), General Clark arrived at Far West with 1600 men,  and 500 more on the outskirts of the city. He ordered General Lucas to send to  Adam-ondi-Ahman and there take all the “Mormon” men prisoners and secure their  property, till the best means could be adopted for paying damages due to the mob  troubles. On the 5th, Clark ordered all the men at Far West to form in line,  when the names of fifty-six were called and they were made prisoners to await  trial for something which was not defined. On the 6th, he again gathered the  male portion of the population and read to them a written address which he had  prepared.

 

His Harangue

 

Feeling safe in the presence of so many helpless men, and flanked by his troops,  he made bold to impress upon the brethren the enormity of their crimes. He read  to them a number of stipulations to which they must comply. The first, second  and third, to the effect that they must surrender their leading men, deliver  their arms, and sign over their properties to defray expenses of the “war.”  This, he said, they had done. The fourth is here repeated:

 

 “Another article yet remains for you to comply with, and that is, that you leave  the state forthwith; and whatever may be your feelings concerning this, or  whatever your innocence, it is nothing to me; General Lucas, who is equal in  authority with me, has made this treaty with you I approve of it I should have  done the same had I been here. I am therefore determined to see it fulfilled.  The character of this state has suffered almost beyond redemption, from the  character, conduct and influence that you have exerted, and we deem it an act  of justice to restore her character to its former standing among the states, by  every proper means.

 

“The orders of the governor to me were that you should be exterminated, and not  allowed to remain in the state, and had your leaders not been given up, and the  terms of the treaty complied with, before this, you and your families would have  been destroyed and your houses in ashes.

 

“There is a discretionary power vested in my hands which I shall exercise in  your favor for a season; for this lenity you are indebted to my clemency. I do  not say that you shall go now, but you must not think of staying here another  season or of putting in crops, for the moment you do this the citizens will be  upon you. If I am called here again, in case of a non-compliance of a treaty  made, do not think that I shall act any more as I have done you need not expect  any mercy, but extermination, for I am determined the governor’s order shall be  executed. As for your leaders, do not once think do not imagine for a moment do  not let it enter your mind that they will be delivered, or that you will see  their faces again, for their fate is fixed their die is cast their doom is  sealed.”

 

He then very graciously pleaded with them, and invoked the “Great Spirit, the  unknown God,” to make them sufficiently intelligent to break the chains of  superstition, that they no longer worship man, and never again organize with  bishops, presidents, etc., but to become like other men.

 

Trial in Daviess County

 

About this time Governor Boggs wrote General Clark to hold a military court in  Daviess County, and try those “guilty of the late outrages, committed towards  the inhabitants of said county.” He was desirous of having the whole matter  “settled completely, if possible” before the forces should be disbanded. “If the  ‘Mormons’ are disposed,” said Boggs, “voluntarily to leave the state, of course  it would be advisable in you to promote that object, in any way deemed proper.  The ringleaders of this rebellion, though, ought by no means to be permitted to  escape the punishment they merit.” General Robert Wilson was detailed to Daviess  County to take possession of the prisoners. All the men in the town of  Adam-ondi-Ahman were placed under arrest, and a court of inquiry instituted with  the mobber Adam Black on the bench. Notwithstanding this, after three days of  examination, Black acquitted them all. No one knew better than he of their  innocence.

 

The Charges Against Joseph Smith and Companions

 

General Clark spent some time searching the laws to find some authority by which  the Prophet and companions could be tried for treason by court martial. He even  sent to Fort Leavenworth seeking such information, which could not be found. It  caused him extreme annoyance that no law could be invoked to try private  citizens by military code when there was no war. He knew some charges would have  to be preferred against the accused, so he wrote the governor saying he had, on  November 10, 1838, made out charges against the prisoners and had called Judge  Austin A. King to try them as a committing court. He also suggested that they be  tried by court martial, especially, said he, should Joseph Smith be so tried,  but he could not discover authority for such procedure, and requested the  opinion of the attorney general on that point. “There being no civil officers  in Caldwell,” he said, “I have to use the military to get witnesses from there,  which I do without reserve.” The civil officers in Caldwell, being “Mormons” had  all been cast into jail, and of course were not available. He closed his epistle  by saying the accused brethren were guilty of “treason, murder, arson, burglary,  robbery, larceny, and perjury.” The reply he received was to turn the prisoners  over to the civil law, which order hurt him very much, for he hoped to have the  pleasure of attending to their execution, after a military trial. In fact, he  and Lucas had on several occasions set the date of execution, but the hand of  the Lord was always over the afflicted brethren.

 

The Trial

 

Monday, November 12, 1838, Judge King sent out armed men to obtain witnesses,  some of whom came and testified willingly to falsehoods; others came  reluctantly. Among the witnesses who testified against the brethren were: Dr.  Sampson Avard, originator of the “Danites,” who, later, was excommunicated from  the Church for the offense; John Corrill, George M. Hinkle, Reed Peck, John  Cleminson, Burr Riggs, William W. Phelps, John Whitmer, and others who formerly  belonged to the Church. The testimony of the prosecution continued until the  18th. Then the court called for witnesses for the defense; forty or more names  were given, and the Reverend-Captain Rogart was dispatched with a company of  militia to get them. He got them and brought them, not to the court, but to  prison, and confined them there. During the week, the judge taunted the brethren  because no witnesses appeared in their defense. Other names were given, and the  same reverend-captain was sent for them. He did not find many, for the  witnesses, learning what had happened to their fellows, could not be found. The  few he did discover he also brought and cast behind the bars. In this manner the  mock trial proceeded from day to day. On the 24th, twenty-three of the  defendants were released, and by the 28th all the others were acquitted or  admitted to bail, excepting the following: Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Hyrum  Smith, Lyman Wight, Caleb Baldwin and Alexander McRae, who were ordered to be  taken to Liberty, Clay County, and there committed to stand trial on the various  charges named; Parley P. Pratt, Morris Phelps, Luman Gibbs, Darwin Chase and  Norman Shearer, who were taken to Richmond Jail, there also to await trial for  the same “crimes.”

 

Nature of the Testimony

 

Some of the witnesses testified that the Church was a temporal kingdom, which  would, according to the teachings of its leaders, eventually “fill the whole  earth and subdue all other kingdoms.” The seventh chapter of Daniel was referred  to several times. The brethren were asked by the judge if they believed in  Daniel’s prophecy and when they answered in the affirmative, Judge King turning  to his clerk said: “Write that down; it is a strong point for treason.” The  defendants’ attorneys, Doniphan and Rees, protested saying, “Judge, you had  better make the Bible treason.” These attorneys advised their clients not to  make any defense or attempt to furnish other witnesses, for it was useless.  Doniphan observed that if a cohort of angels were to come down, and declare the  prisoners innocent, it would all be the same, for Judge King had determined from  the beginning to cast them into prison.

 

Malinda Porter, Delia F. Pine, Nancy Rigdon, Jonathan W. Barlow, Thoret Parson,  Ezra Chipman and Arza Judd, Jr., volunteered to testify for the defense, but  were prevented from giving testimony favorable to the accused at the point of  the bayonet.

 

November 29, 1838, Joseph Smith and fellow prisoners were committed to the  keeping of the sheriff of Clay County, who took them to Liberty and cast them in  prison. Parley P. Pratt and fellows were likewise retained in Richmond, and thus  ended this “trial” before Judge King.

 

Notes

 

1.  This was a brother named Carey, who had been beaten over the head until his  brains oozed out. He died shortly afterwards, having been exposed in that  condition without shelter, all afternoon and night.

 

2.  Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt, p. 204.

 

3.  During these trying scenes, November 13, 1838, while Hyrum Smith, with the  Prophet and the other prisoners, were incarcerated, Joseph Fielding Smith, who  afterwards became President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,  was born at Far West. When he was but a few days old, members of this  mob-militia entered the home, ransacked it, and turned the bedding, on which the  infant lay, upside down, smothering him until his life was apparently gone when  he was discovered.

 

4.  Parley P. Pratt declared that General Wilson made the following statement:  “It was repeatedly insinuated, by the other officers and troops, that we should  hang you prisoners on the first tree we came to on the way to Independence. But  I’ll be d‌ ‌d if anybody shall hurt you. We just intend to exhibit you in  Independence, and let the people look at you, and see what a d‌ ‌d set of fine  fellows you are. And, more particularly, to keep you from that old bigot of a  general, Clark, and his troops, from down county, who are so stuffed with lies  and prejudice, that they would shoot you down in a moment.”

 

5.  Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt, pages 228  through 9.

 

 Chapter 26 The Expulsion from Missouri. 1838 through 1839

 

The Case Before the Legislature

 

In December, 1838, the Legislature of Missouri met. Governor Boggs laid before  that body the information in his hands relative to the difficulty with the  Latter-day Saints. This information was woefully lacking in the matter of the  petitions and documents sent to him in defense of the Saints. On the 10th of  that month Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, John Taylor and other brethren  petitioned the legislature, setting forth their side of the case. This petition  was presented to David R. Atchison and others, December 17. The following day  Mr. Turner, from a joint committee, presented before the senate a report of  findings, based on the governor’s information. This report stated that the  evidence was “not authenticated,” and was confined chiefly to investigation of  criminal charges against individuals under arrest; the evidence was ex parte;  and without aid of further evidence, the committee could not form a satisfactory  opinion in relation to the material points. For these reasons, and because “it  would be a direct interference with the administration of justice, the committee  reported that this document ought not to be published, with the sanction of the  legislature.” December 19, the petition of the brethren was presented by John  Corrill, who had but recently departed from the Church. It was read in profound  silence, but at the close of the reading, the house was in an uproar. A Mr.  Childs, of Jackson County, denounced the petition saying there was not a word of  truth in it. Mr. Ashley, of Livingstone County, denounced the “Mormons” as did  also Mr. Young, of Lafayette. Ashley was one of the murderers at Haun’s Mill,  and even boasted of that slaughter before the house. Mr. Redman, of Howard  County, and Mr. Gyer, of St. Louis, and a few other members, demanded a full  investigation, for they believed there was truth in the petition, and the  actions of those members in opposing an investigation was because they feared  their evil deeds might be brought to light. The result of it all was that the  petition was laid on the table, “until the 4th day of July next,” Independence  day. January 16, 1839, Mr. Turner introduced in the senate a bill “to provide  for the investigation of the late disturbances in this state.” The bill passed  the senate, but when it came to the house (Feb. 4) it followed the petition and  was laid on the table, also to be taken up on Independence day. Many considered  this an approval of the wrongs committed on the “Mormons” in Missouri. David R.  Atchison and a few others vigorously protested against such criminal action, but  found themselves in the minority, for the motion prevailed by a majority of  eleven votes.

 

Legislative Appropriations

 

In December, the legislature of Missouri appropriated two thousand dollars “to  be distributed among the people of Daviess and Caldwell Counties.” The “good”  people of Daviess were very “generous” and felt that they could do without their  portion of this appropriation, and let it be given to the people of Caldwell.  They could well afford to do such a thing, for they had robbed the “Mormon”  people of nearly all they possessed. They had ransacked their homes and carried  off their household furniture and goods, and otherwise enriched themselves at  the expense of the Saints who had dwelt among them. This sum, so it was  pretended, was distributed among the people in Caldwell. Judge Cameron and  others attended to the “distribution.” The way they did it was to drive off the  hogs belonging to the “Mormons” and shoot them, and without further bleeding,  cut them up and deliver them to the Saints, at four or five cents a pound. They  also “gave them a few calicos,” and the “sweepings of an old store,” charging  them an extra price for the goods, and thus was the “munificient” sum of two  thousand dollars distributed among the “Mormons.” Later the same legislature  appropriated two hundred thousand dollars to pay the troops for their work in  driving the “Mormons” from the state. In this manner were law and justice  administered in Missouri in the years 1838 and 1839.

 

Extent of “Mormon” Losses

 

The total value of the property destroyed in Missouri, which belonged to the  Saints, is beyond our knowledge. It was estimated to be not less than two  million dollars, from the time they first settled in that state until their  expulsion. About twelve hundred members of the Church were driven from Jackson  County in 1833, and all their property was lost to them. When again they were  forced to leave Clay County, though they went peaceably at the request of the  other citizens, they left behind them a vast amount of property for which no  remuneration was ever received. When they were expelled from the state in the  winter of 1838  through 9, the Saints numbered between twelve and fifteen thousand  souls. All their property, except the little they were able to gather hastily  and carry with them, was either destroyed or stolen by their enemies. In the  appeal made to Congress and the President of the United States, in 1839, the  amount of their losses was estimated at two million dollars. Claims against  Missouri for the losses were presented to Congress in the sum of $1,381,044.00,  and this represented only 491 individuals; many others who lost property,  entered no claims for damages against that state.

 

In addition to this loss of property, the Prophet Joseph paid in lawyers’ fees,  for the defense of the people and himself, against the unhallowed persecutions  of their enemies, about fifty thousand dollars; with very little benefit in  return. And for all this, the generous state of Missouri, for a show before the  world of their charity and kindness toward the people they had robbed, could  afford to appropriate the magnificent sum of two thousand dollars! And what of  the blood of men, women and children which had been shed by these human fiends?

 

In Liberty Prison

 

After the mock trial in Richmond, Joseph Smith and his five companions were  imprisoned in Liberty, Clay County, for a period of six months. Here they  suffered, during that time, many untold hardships. Much of the time they were  bound in chains. Their food was often not fit to eat, and never wholesome or  prepared with the thought of proper nourishment. Several times poison was  administered to them in their food, which made them sick nigh unto death, and  only the promised blessings of the Lord saved them. Their bed was on the floor,  or on the flat side of a hewn white oak log, and in this manner they were forced  to suffer. Is it any wonder that they cried in the anguish of their souls unto  the Lord, for relief from such inhuman treatment?

 

Epistles From Prison

 

The Lord did not forsake them. While they were confined, the brethren wrote a  number of communications to the Saints. Occasionally their friends were  privileged to visit them, but always in the presence of a strong and heavily  armed guard. Letters with words of comfort were occasionally received, and in  this way their spirits were buoyed up, which enabled them to stand their trials.  On March 25, 1839, an epistle of special import was written from the prison to  the Saints scattered abroad, and to the bishop, Edward Partridge, in particular.  This epistle portrayed many of their grievances and expressed their love and  fellowship for the Saints. Above all this, however, they poured out their souls  to the Lord asking for relief, and wondering why they were so severely punished.  The Lord gave them answer which comforted them and built them up in hope. They  also received encouragement, and assurance of their delivery from bonds, which  was soon to come to pass.1

 

Release of Sidney Rigdon

 

The Prophet wrote in his Journal that January 1, 1839, “dawned upon us as  prisoners of hope, but not as sons of liberty. O Columbia, Columbia! How thou  art fallen! ‘The land of the free, the home of the brave!’ ‘The asylum of the  oppressed’ oppressing thy noblest sons, in a loathsome dungeon, without any  provocation, only that they have claimed to worship the God of their fathers  according to his own word, and the dictates of their own consciences.” Elder  Parley P. Pratt and his companions in tribulation were still held in bondage in  their doleful prison in Richmond. The brethren appealed to the supreme court in  Missouri for a writ of habeas corpus. Twice their petition was denied. They also  petitioned the judges of the county for like privileges, and sent a memorial to  the legislature asking that they be granted a fair and impartial trial before an  unprejudiced judge in some other circuit, where they might have hope of justice,  which could not be obtained from Judge King. Finally, in the latter part of  February, 1839, they prevailed on Judge Turnham, one of the county judges, who  granted their request after some reluctance. The judge was afraid of the mob,  for the threats were made by the members of the banditti, that if any judge,  jury or court of any kind, should free the prisoners they would be killed. Great  threatenings were made at the time of this trial, and the brethren would have  been liberated, only for the blundering, wilfully or ignorantly, of their  lawyers. Sidney Rigdon, who had suffered terribly because of exposure and the  ill-treatment he had received, he being much older and less able to endure than  the other brethren, was released by the action of the judge, at this time.  Through a kindness on the part of the sheriff, Samuel Hadley, and the jailer,  Samuel Tillery, he was let out of prison in the night, for fear of the mob, and  told to make his way out of the state as soon as he could. Even as it was, he  was pursued by a body of armed men; but having a good start made his way to  Quincy, Illinois.

 

Departure for Daviess

 

The refusal on the part of the courts and officials to grant a final trial for  it should be remembered the brethren were being held on a preliminary hearing  all these months and the threatenings of numerous enemies caused the brethren to  determine on making their escape if possible. Once they tried and failed. Again  the opportunity presented itself, and the Lord indicated to them that if they  were united they could gain their freedom, but the stubbornness of Lyman Wight  defeated their purpose. The latter part of March, Elders Heber C. Kimball and  Theodore Turley went to Jefferson City with necessary papers, to see the  governor, but he was absent. However, they saw the secretary of state, who  appeared astonished at the action of Judge King, and who wrote the judge a  letter. They also saw the supreme court judges, but due to the blundering of  their attorney, Doniphan, they were unable to obtain a writ of habeas corpus.  They returned to Liberty on the 30th of March. April 4, they had an interview  with Judge Austin A. King, who was angry to think they had been to see the  governor. King said he could have done all that they desired, and would have  signed their petition if he had been approached, for all the prisoners, but  Joseph Smith, “and he was not fit to live.” Fearing that the brethren might  obtain a change of venue, Judge King hurried off with them, April 6, 1839, to  Daviess County, where he hoped to continue his persecution. Perhaps he hoped  they would be murdered, for a band of fifty men in Daviess County, on learning  that the prisoners were coming, took an oath that they would neither eat nor  drink until they had murdered the Prophet. The prisoners arrived at Gallatin,  April 8, and the following day the examination of witnesses commenced before  the grand jury, over which Judge King acted as the presiding judge. Judge Birch,  the county judge, who previously assisted in the prosecution of the brethren,  was associated with him. Both judges and jury were drunk while the case  proceeded, and the men of the jury were members of the raiding party of Haun’s  Mill. They served on the jury during the day and as guards at night, and in  their drunken debauchery boasted of their many crimes. On the 11th of April,  they brought in a “true bill” against the prisoners for “murder, treason,  burglary, arson, larceny, theft and stealing.”

 

A Change of Venue

 

On April 15, 1839, the brethren obtained from Judge Birch a change of venue from  Daviess to Boone County, and a mittimus was made out by him without date, name  or place. The prisoners were fitted out with a two-horse wagon, necessary  horses, and four men besides the sheriff, to guard them to Boone County. The  prisoners numbered five, as follows: Joseph Smith, Hyrum Smith, Lyman Wight,  Caleb Baldwin, and Alexander McRae. They started from Gallatin in the afternoon  and went as far as Diahman, where they camped for the night at Judge Morin’s.  The next day they went about twenty miles where a jug of whiskey was procured,  and all of the guards, save one, got drank and went to bed. The sheriff showed  the prisoners the mittimus and said to them that Judge Birch told him never to  carry them to Boone County, and never to show the mittimus, and, the sheriff  said: “I shall take a good drink of whiskey and go to bed, and you may do as you  are a mind to.”

 

The Escape

 

The prisoners bought from the guards two of the horses, paying for one with  clothing, and giving their note for the other. After four of the guards had  retired and were asleep in drunken slumber, the fifth helped them to saddle the  horses and started them on their way. Two of the brethren mounted and three went  on foot, changing places from time to time. Said Hyrum Smith, “we took our  change of venue for the state of Illinois, and in the course of nine or ten days  arrived at Quincy, Adams County.” They found their families in good health, but  in a state of poverty due to their persecutions and expulsion from Missouri’s  soil.

 

A “Concocted Plan”

 

Samuel Tillery, the jailer at Liberty, told the prisoners that the persecutions  against the Saints was a “concocted plan,” framed by the various officers who  took part in it, from the governor down. It was first planned in the fore part  of the year 1838, but was not fully carried out until the militia was sent down  against the Saints in Caldwell and Daviess Counties. “But,” said Tillery,  shortly before the removal of the brethren to Daviess County from Liberty  Prison, “you need not be concerned, for the governor has laid a plan for your  release.” He also said that the governor was now ashamed enough of the whole  transaction, and would be glad to set the prisoners at liberty, if he dared to  do it. Without question the conspirators became alarmed. They did not plan the  escape of the Prophet and associates because of any repentance, or remorse of  conscience, but because of the fear of public sentiment, without as well as  within the state. Knowledge of the dastardly actions of the officers of  Missouri, who were pledged by oath to uphold and honor their constitution, which  grants liberty to all citizens2  in their religious worship, spread abroad into  other commonwealths. The citizens of western Illinois received the exiled Saints  with open arms, and invited them to make their homes among them. The governor  of Iowa, Robert Lucas, wrote and spoke in a vehement manner in opposition to the  treatment the “Mormon” people received in Missouri. He invited the Saints to  make their homes within the borders of the territory of Iowa. All these things  had their effect on the assassins in Missouri, and caused them to fear and  tremble. Governor Boggs, himself, became sick of the reproach brought upon the  state, and reached the point where he would have gladly released Joseph Smith  and his fellow prisoners, but feared that such an action would properly be  interpreted as an acknowledgment of his unlawful course. He preferred to have it  so arranged that they could escape and appear before the world as fugitives from  justice.

 

Escape of Parley P. Pratt

 

At the time Joseph Smith and his companions were sent to Liberty, Elders Parley  P. Pratt, Morris Phelps, Luman Gibbs, Norman Shearer and Darwin Chase, were sent  to Richmond, to await trial on the same charges. Here they suffered many untold  hardships and deprivations in their dungeon, until April 24, 1839, a period of  six months, when they were taken before the grand jury in Ray County, for a  hearing of their case. The same notorious Judge Austin A. King presided at the  deliberations of this body. Norman Shearer and Darwin Chase, who were only  boys, were released, and King Follett, an aged man, was added to the list of  prisoners. A change of venue having been granted them, the brethren were taken  to Columbia, Boone County, and again cast into prison. In the meantime Luman  Gibbs apostatized, hoping to gain his liberty, but the crafty officers, although  they treated him with improved consideration, still kept him in prison to act as  a spy on his former brethren. July 4, 1839, Elders Pratt, Phelps and Follett,  assisted on the outside by Orson Pratt and a young man named John W. Clark, a  brother-in-law of Elder Phelps, escaped in a very thrilling and novel manner.  Elder Follett was re-captured, but the other two made their way, after many  hardships and difficulties, to Illinois and the presence of their families.  Elder Follett was again cast into prison and bound in chains, but in course of a  month or two was dismissed, no charge having been proved against him.

 

Departure of the Exiles

 

With all three members of the First Presidency in prison, the burden of removing  the Saints from Missouri was placed on the shoulders of President Brigham Young,  of the council of the apostles. A public meeting was held at Far West, January  26, 1839, and a committee composed of the following brethren was selected to  draft resolutions and consider means for the removal of the Saints from  Missouri: Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, John Taylor, Alanson Ripley, Theodore  Turley, John Smith and Don Carlos Smith. This committee went to work gathering  such means as could be obtained, and devising plans for the removal of the poor.  Later a committee on removal was appointed with the following members: William  Huntington, chairman; Charles Bird, Alanson Ripley, Theodore Turley, Daniel  Shearer, Shadrack Roundy and Jonathan H. Hale. During the winter months the  exodus began, and many of the Saints gathered at Quincy, Illinois, where they  received a kindly welcome. Due to their extreme poverty for they had been robbed  and plundered many of the members of the Church were unable to get away before  the spring of 1839. April arrived, and the vicious mobocrats met in council on  the 6th, and determined that all the “Mormons” should be out of Caldwell County  by the 12th of that month. All available teams were secured, and help was  solicited from the members of the Church who were already in Illinois, and the  remaining Saints at Far West began their journey from Missouri. Thirty families  were removed into Tenney’s Grove, twenty-five miles from Far West, by the 14th  of April, on their way to Quincy. Most of the committee remained at Far West  until the last. President Brigham Young was forced to leave about the middle of  February, to save his life from the angry Missourians who sought it. From the  Illinois side he directed the location of the Saints.

 

Thursday, April 18, 1839, Elder Heber C. Kimball notified the members of the  committee on removal to wind up their affairs at once, and be off, for their  lives were in grave danger. An armed force went to the home of Theodore Turley  to shoot him; similar action was taken against other members of the committee,  and a number of mobbers tried to kill Heber C. Kimball in the streets of Far  West. The members of the Church had now departed; many went by way of Richmond  and the Missouri River to Quincy. The members of the committee who still  remained, were given one hour to get out of the place. Hurriedly gathering up  such articles as they could take with them, they departed. The mobbers then  commenced to loot the homes, which had not already been looted of all they  contained.

 

Governor Boggs and his aids had gained a great victory; the Latter-day Saints  had either been exterminated, or driven from the borders of Missouri, according  to his order. Only those remained who were incarcerated, and the day of their  deliverance was near at hand.

 

Fulfilment of Prophecy

 

A revelation was given July 8, 1838, calling John Taylor, John E. Page, Wilford  Woodruff and Willard Richards to the apostleship. John Taylor and John E. Page  were ordained under the hands of Brigham Young and Heber C. Kimball at a meeting  held in Far West, December 19, 1838. In this revelation (Doc. and Cov., Sec.  118) the apostles were commanded to take their leave of the Saints from the  temple lot in Far West on the 26th day of April, 1839. April had arrived and the  Saints were scattered, likewise the members of the council of the apostles. On  the 5th day of April, Samuel Bogart, the mobber, with John Whitmer and a few  other apostates, came to the room occupied by the committee on removal and read  this revelation to Theodore Turley. With much laughter and assurance that it  could not be fulfilled, they called on him to renounce Joseph Smith, which now  he must do as a rational man. The apostates said: “The twelve are now scattered  all over creation; let them come here if they dare; if they do, they will be  murdered. As that revelation cannot be fulfilled, you will now give up your  faith.” Turley jumped up and said: “In the name of God that revelation will be  fulfilled.” They laughed him to scorn. John Whitmer hung his head in shame. In  the course of the conversation Turley asked John Whitmer if his testimony  regarding the Book of Mormon was true, and Whitmer answered: “I now say, I  handled those plates; there were fine engravings on both sides. I handled them;”  and he then described how they were hung, and then he said, “They were shown to  me by a supernatural power.”

 

The 26th day of April arrived, and so also did the apostles at the temple lot in  Far West. Early that morning, these brethren and a few of the Saints assembled  at the temple lot, and proceeded to transact the business of their mission as  they were commanded, according to the following minutes:

 

 “At a conference held at Far West by the twelve, high priests, elders, and  priests, on the 26th day of April, 1839, the following resolution was adopted:

 

“Resolved: That the following persons be no more fellowshiped in the Church of  Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but excommunicated from the same, viz.: Isaac  Russell, Mary Russell, John Goodson and wife, Jacob Scott, Sen., and wife, Isaac  Scott, Jacob Scott, Jun., Ann Scott, Sister Walton, Robert Walton, Sister  Cavanaugh, Ann Wanless, William Dawson, Jun., William Dawson, Sen., and wife,  George Nelson, Joseph Nelson, and wife, and mother, William Warnock and wife,  Jonathan Maynard, Nelson Maynard, George Miller, John Griggs and wife, Luman  Gibbs, Simeon Gardner, and Freeborn Gardner.3

 

“The council then proceeded to the building spot of the Lord’s House; when the  following business was transacted: Part of a hymn was sung, on the mission of  the twelve.

 

“Elder Alpheus Cutler, the master workman of the house, then recommenced laying  the foundation of the Lord’s House, agreeably to the revelation, by rolling up a  large stone near the southeast corner.

 

“The following of the twelve were present: Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball,  Orson Pratt, John E. Page, and John Taylor, who proceeded to ordain Wilford  Woodruff and George A. Smith, who had been previously nominated by the First  Presidency, accepted by the twelve, and acknowledged by the Church, to the  office of apostles and members of the quorum of the twelve, to fill the places  of those who had fallen. Darwin Chase and Norman Shearer, who had just been  liberated from Richmond prison, where they had been confined for the cause of  Jesus Christ, were then ordained to the office of the seventies.”

 

After vocal prayer by each of the members of the council of the twelve, and  singing, the apostles took their leave of the Saints there assembled, and  departed for Illinois, and later for their mission to Great Britain. And thus  closed the history of the Latter-day Saints in Missouri until some future day.

 

Notes

 

1.  The prayer and the answer the Lord gave the Prophet are found in sections  121, 122, 123, of the Doctrine and Covenants.

 

 2. The Constitution of Missouri read as follows:

 

 Article 4. That all men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship  Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; and that no man  can be compelled to erect, support, or attend any place of worship, or to  maintain any minister of the Gospel, or teacher of religion; that no human  authority can control or interfere with the rights of conscience; that no person  can ever be hurt, molested, or restrained in his religious professions, or  sentiments, if he do not disturb others in their religious worship.

 

 Article 5. That no person, on account of his religious opinions, can be rendered  ineligible to any office of trust or profit under this state; that no preference  can ever be given by law, to any sect or mode of worship.

 

3.  At a conference held in Quincy, Illinois, March 17, 1839, George M. Hinkle,  Sampson Avard, John Corrill, Reed Peck, Frederick G. Williams, Thomas B. Marsh,  Burr Riggs and several others were excommunicated from the Church.

 

 Part Four The Nauvoo Period

 

 Chapter 27 The Founding of Nauvoo. 1839 through 1840

 

Seeking a New Home

 

In January, 1839, the threats of the mob, and their violence, became so severe  that the Saints at Far West were forced to flee from Missouri. In November,  1838, those members of the Church residing at Adam-ondi-Ahman had been driven  from their homes, and General Clark, in his abusive harangue at Far West, told  the people they must not think of remaining another season. Should they attempt  to put in crops he would extend no mercy, and extermination at his hands would  be their doom.

 

The exodus was carried on as rapidly as circumstances would permit. Even in the  inclement weather of the winter months the vanguard made their way eastward as  far as Quincy, Illinois. Here they were met with a kindly welcome by the  citizens of that place. Just where the Saints would locate was an indefinite  problem, and the Prophet, still held in prison, could give them very little  help. He advised them to locate in some friendly territory between Far West and  Kirtland, where they might dwell in peace. It is likely that many of the  refugees from Missouri, who started on their eastward journey expected to work  their way back to the former settlements of the Saints in Ohio; but the  hospitable treatment they received and the suggestions from the people of  western Illinois, caused them to stop at Quincy. In fact, they could do little  else in their stricken condition, and a kind word and a hand outstretched with  relief, were most welcome. In Quincy an organization known as the Democratic  Association extended every kindness to the exiles, and proffered to help them in  their distress. Several meetings of this society were held, in which other  citizens of Quincy took a part, in February and March of 1839. Sympathy was  expressed for the “Mormons” and steps were taken to allay the prejudice of the  misguided residents of Quincy, who felt an opposition to the Saints. At one of  these meetings the “Mormons” were invited to attend, and Sidney Rigdon and  others related the persecutions in Missouri, which account fell on sympathetic  ears. Through this organization material assistance was given the Saints, and  employment for many was provided. The organization voiced its disapproval of the  evil treatment accorded the exiles while in Missouri, in the following  resolutions:

 

 “Resolved, that we regard the rights of conscience as natural and inalienable,  and the most sacred guaranteed by the Constitution of our free government.

 

“Resolved, that we regard the acts of all mobs as flagrant violations of law;  and those who compose them, individually responsible, both to the laws of God  and man, for every depredation committed upon the property, rights, or life of  any citizen.

 

“Resolved, that the inhabitants upon the western frontier of the state of  Missouri, in their late persecutions of the class of people denominated  ‘Mormons,’ have violated the sacred rights of conscience, and every law of  justice and humanity.

 

“Resolved, that the governor of Missouri, in refusing protection to this class  of people, when pressed upon by a heartless mob, and turning upon them a band of  unprincipled militia, with orders encouraging their extermination, has brought a  lasting disgrace upon the state over which he presides.”

 

The Saints also were kindly received by Governor Thomas Carlin and United States  Senator Richard M. Young, and many other prominent citizens of western Illinois.

 

In a communication to the Quincy  Argus, Elder John Taylor expressed the  gratitude of the “Mormon” people, and said they felt under peculiar obligations  to the citizens of Quincy; but he warned them against imposition on the part of  any who may pretend to belong to the community of Latter-day Saints, but who  were not  either those who never belonged to the Church, or those who, for  cause, had been expelled.

 

While the sympathies of these good people were, without question, given in  sincerity, nevertheless there was more or less selfishness connected with their  action. It is quite evident, from events to follow, that they expected to obtain  some political and business advantages, out of the kindness extended to these  destitute and stricken refugees, who sought a haven of peace and rest within the  borders of the state. The expulsion from Missouri occurred shortly before one of  the most intense presidential elections, and a residence within the State of  Illinois for six months gave the citizens a right to vote. The politicians on  both sides lost no opportunity to seek the advantage which the “Mormon” vote  would bring; and the “Mormons,” too heavily engaged with thoughts of recent  persecutions, and hopes of building communities where they could dwell in  perfect peace, failed to comprehend the situation in which they were being  placed. By siding with one faction, it was bound to alienate the other, and thus  cause bitterness of feeling which might not be overcome. In course of time such  proved to be the case.

 

Committee to Locate Lands

 

While the Saints were gathering at Quincy, committees were appointed to seek out  suitable places for permanent settlement. A meeting was held in February, 1839,  to consider the proposition of purchasing about twenty thousand acres, at two  dollars an acre, between the Des Moines and Missouri Rivers, on what were called  half-breed lands. Other sites were also considered from time to time, but no  definite action was taken until the arrival of Joseph Smith at Quincy, from his  long confinement in Liberty prison. Elder Israel Barlow, on his flight from  Missouri, made his way to the northeast and arrived in a destitute condition  near the mouth of the Des Moines River. There he was kindly received and related  the sad experiences of the Latter-day Saints. He made the acquaintance of Dr.  Isaac Galland, who owned considerable property both in Iowa and Illinois, a  short distance farther north. Mr. Galland resided at a place called Commerce, in  Hancock County, Illinois, about fifty miles up the Mississippi from Quincy and  lying on the bank of the river.

 

Commerce

 

Mr. Galland in a communication to David W. Rodgers, suggested that the Saints  locate in Iowa, which was a territory; for he thought they would be more likely  to receive protection from mobs under the jurisdiction of the United States,  than they would in a state of the Union, “where murder, rapine and robbery are  admirable (!) traits in the character of a demagogue; and where the greatest  villains often reach the highest offices.” He also wrote to Governor Robert  Lucas of Iowa, who had known the “Mormon” people in Ohio, and who spoke very  highly of them as good citizens. However, when the Prophet arrived at Quincy in  April, he purchased from Hugh White a farm of one hundred and thirty-five acres,  for the sum of five thousand dollars; also another farm from Dr. Isaac Galland  lying west of the White purchase, for nine thousand dollars. This property,  which was located in the vicinity of Commerce was secured on long time notes. To  these farms the destitute Saints commenced to gather, also to the little town of  Montrose on the Iowa side of the river.

 

Joseph Smith Moves to Commerce

 

Friday, May 10, 1839, President Joseph Smith took up his residence in a small  log house on the bank of the Mississippi, on the White purchase, one mile south  of Commerce. The first house built by any of the Saints in that part was raised  by Theodore Turley, in June, 1839. When the purchase was made of the White and  Galland property, Commerce consisted of one stone house, three frame and two  block houses, three of which were log cabins. Between Commerce and David  Hibbard’s place on the south front of the river there were four houses, three of  which were log cabins, and into one of these the Prophet moved. The place was  virtually a wilderness. The land was covered with trees and bushes, and much of  it, in the lower parts near the river, was so wet that travel by team was  impossible, and on foot, most difficult. Notwithstanding the unhealthful  condition, the Prophet felt that by draining the land, and through the blessing  of the Lord, the place could be made a pleasant habitation for the Saints, and  he decided to build a city there. There was inspiration in this decision, for  this was an excellent site for the building of a city, when the unfavorable  conditions of the lowlands were removed. The Mississippi makes a half circle  around the place, giving three fronts on the river. The ground gradually rises  from the river front for a distance of about one mile to the common level of the  prairie lands which extend beyond. A more beautiful site could not be imagined.

 

The City of Nauvoo

 

The name “Commerce” was soon changed to “The City of Nauvoo.” This word is of  Hebrew origin, and “signifies a beautiful situation, or place,” says the  Prophet, “carrying with it, also, the idea of rest; and is truly descriptive of  the most delightful location. It is situated on the east bank of the Mississippi  River, at the head of the Des Moines Rapids, in Hancock County, bounded on the  east by an extensive prairie of surpassing beauty, and on the north, west and  south, by the Mississippi.” Nauvoo is about one hundred and ninety miles up the  river from St. Louis, and nearly the same distance from Chicago, towards the  west.

 

Other Sites Chosen

 

Other lands were also purchased, for the gathering of the Saints, all on easy  terms. Additional property adjoining that obtained from White and Galland was  obtained from David Hibbard, Daniel H. Wells, Hiram Kimball, Horace R. Hotchkiss  and others, which later became a portion of the city of Nauvoo. Across the river  on the Iowa side, extensive holdings also were obtained. The village of  Nashville, in Lee County, with twenty thousand acres adjoining, were purchased;  also other lands opposite Nauvoo. Here the Prophet instructed the Saints that a  city should be built, to be called Zarahemla. A number of members of the Church  had located here when the Saints were driven from Missouri, and it appeared to  be a suitable location for a permanent settlement of the people.

 

Stakes of Zion Organized

 

At the general conference held at Commerce, October 5  through 7, 1839, two stakes of  Zion were organized, one at Commerce, with William Marks as president, and one  in Iowa, with John Smith as president. Later a number of other stakes were  organized in Quincy, Lima, Columbus and Geneva, Illinois, but they did not  continue very long.1 The idea seemed to be that the Latter-day Saints should  spread out over considerable territory, and form organizations in various parts  of the country, but this plan was abandoned, and the Saints scattered abroad  were commanded by revelation in January, 1841, to gather to Hancock County,  Illinois, and to Lee County, Iowa, and to build up the settlements in these  parts occupied by the members of the Church. This was, the presidency wrote,  “agreeable to the order of heaven.” Consequently, the Saints began to immigrate  to Nauvoo, and the city grew rapidly by such additions. About one year after the  location of the site, Nauvoo had a population of over three thousand souls, and  six years later, at the time of the great western exodus, about twenty thousand.  The stake at Zarahemla was later discontinued, but John Smith remained there to  preside over the Saints in Iowa.

 

Miraculous Healing of the Sick

 

Due to the unhealthful condition of the place when the people first arrived at  Commerce, many were taken sick with malaria fever, and were nigh unto death.  Some of the refugees were sheltered only by tents and wagon covers, for there  had been little time, and less means, by which houses, even of logs, could be  built. On the morning of July 22, 1839, the Prophet arose from his own bed of  sickness and being filled with the Spirit of the Lord, he went forth along the  river bank healing all who were afflicted. Among the number were Henry G.  Sherwood and Benjamin Brown, who appeared in a dying condition. He later crossed  over the river to Montrose and healed Brigham Young and a number of other  brethren of the twelve, and took them along with him to assist him in this  ministry. What took place in Iowa is thus related by Elder Wilford Woodruff:

 

 “After healing all the sick upon the bank of the river as far as the stone  house, he called upon Elder Kimball and some others to accompany him across the  river to visit the sick at Montrose. Many of the Saints were living at the old  military barracks. Among the number were several of the twelve. On his arrival,  the first house he visited was that occupied by Elder Brigham Young, the  president of the quorum of the twelve, who lay sick. Joseph healed him, then he  arose and accompanied the Prophet on his visit to others who were in the same  condition. They visited Elder W. Woodruff, also Elders Orson Pratt and John  Taylor, all of whom were living in Montrose. They also accompanied him. The next  place they visited was the home of Elijah Fordham, who was supposed to be about  breathing his last. When the company entered the room the Prophet of God walked  up to the dying man, and took hold of his right hand and spoke to him; but  Brother Fordham was unable to speak, his eyes were set in his head like glass,  and he seemed entirely unconscious of all around him. Joseph held his hand and  looked into his eyes in silence for a length of time. A change in the  countenance of Brother Fordham was soon perceptible to all present. His sight  returned, and upon Joseph asking him if he knew him, he, in a low whisper,  answered, ‘Yes.’ Joseph asked him if he had faith to be healed. He answered, ‘I  fear it is too late; if you had come sooner I think I would have been healed.’  The Prophet said, ‘Do you believe in Jesus Christ?’ He answered in a feeble  voice, ‘I do.’ Joseph then stood erect, still holding his hand in silence  several moments; then he spoke in a very loud voice, saying: ‘Brother Fordham, I  command you in the name of Jesus Christ to arise from this bed and be made  whole.’ His voice was like the voice of God, and not of man. It seemed as though  the house shook to its very foundations. Brother Fordham arose from his bed and  was immediately made whole. His feet were bound in poultices, which he kicked  off, then putting on his clothes, he ate a bowl of bread and milk, and followed  the Prophet into the street.”

 

In this manner the Prophet and the brethren passed from house to house, healing  the sick and recalling them from the mouth of the tomb. It was on this occasion  that a man, not a member of the Church, seeing the mighty miracles which were  performed, begged the Prophet to go with him and heal two of his children who  were very sick. The Prophet could not go, but said he would send some one to  heal them. Taking from his pocket a silk handkerchief he handed it to Elder  Wilford Woodruff and requested him to go and heal the children. He told Elder  Woodruff to wipe the faces of the children with the handkerchief, and they  should be healed. This he did and they were healed. “As long as you keep that  handkerchief,” said Joseph to Brother Woodruff, as he sent him on his way, “it  shall remain a league between you and me.”

 

Incorporation of the City of Nauvoo

 

Nauvoo was incorporated in December, 1840. On the 16th day of that month  Governor Thomas Carlin signed the bill. Stephen A. Douglas was secretary of  state; and Abraham Lincoln, a member of the legislature, had favored the bill.  The boundaries of the city were defined, with ample provision for expansion. The  city council was to consist of a mayor, four aldermen and nine councilors. The  election was to take place on the first Monday in February, 1841.

 

A Liberal Charter

 

The charter of the city was one of most liberal powers. It was all yes, even  more than the Saints, so long harassed by mobs, had hoped to receive. It  contained twenty-eight sections and was bounded in its limitations only by the  Constitution of the United States and that of the state of Illinois. All the  powers “conferred on the city council of the city of Springfield” were granted  to the city of Nauvoo. The Mayor and Aldermen were given all the powers of  justices of the peace, both in civil and criminal cases, arising under the laws  of the state. A municipal court was provided composed of the mayor as chief  justice, and the aldermen as associates. This court had power to grant writs of  habeas corpus under all cases arising under the ordinances of the city council,  and trial by jury was guaranteed before twelve men.

 

The University of Nauvoo

 

The city council was authorized to establish and organize the “University of the  City of Nauvoo,” for “the teaching of the arts, sciences and learned  professions.” This institution was to be under the management of a board of  trustees, consisting of a chancellor, registrar and twenty-three regents. These  trustees were to be appointed by the city council, and they were empowered with  all the “privileges for the advancement of the cause of education which  appertain to the trustees of any other college or university of this state.”

 

The Nauvoo Legion

 

Another provision granted the city council the power to “organize the  inhabitants of said city, subject to military duty, into a body of independent  military men, to be called the ‘Nauvoo Legion,’ the court martial of which shall  be composed of the commissioned officers of said legion, and constitute the  law-making department, with full power and authority to make, ordain, establish,  and execute all such laws and ordinances as may be considered necessary for the  benefit, government, and regulation of said legion; provided said court martial  shall pass no law or act, repugnant to, or inconsistent with the Constitution of  the United States, or of this State; and provided also that the officers of the  legion shall be commissioned by the governor of the State.” This legion was to  perform the same amount of military duty as other bodies of the regular militia,  and to be subject to the call of the mayor in executing the laws and ordinances  of the city, and the governor for public defense.

 

Election of Municipal Officers

 

On the day appointed the election was held and John C. Bennett, who had taken a  most active part in the securing of the charter, was elected mayor. The aldermen  were William Marks, president of the stake, Samuel H. Smith, Newel K. Whitney  and Daniel H. Wells, the latter at that time, not a member of the Church. The  counselors were, Joseph Smith, Hyrum Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Charles C. Rich, John  T. Barnett, Wilson Law, John P. Greene, Don Carlos Smith, and Vinson Knight. The  council appointed Henry G. Sherwood, marshall; James Sloan, recorder; Robert B.  Thompson, treasurer; James Robinson, assessor; and Austin Cowles, supervisor of  streets. When the Nauvoo Legion was organized, Joseph Smith was elected  lieutenant general, which position he held until his death.

 

Character of the Mayor

 

John C. Bennett, the first mayor of Nauvoo, came to that place near the close of  the year 1840. He was born in Massachusetts in 1804; practiced medicine in Ohio  and later in Illinois. He first heard of the Latter-day Saints during their  persecutions in Missouri, and in the summer of 1840 corresponded with the  Prophet, expressing great sympathy for the Saints, and disapproval of the evil  treatment they had received. At the time of his writing he was  quartermaster-general of the state of Illinois, and had previously served as  “brigadier general of the Invincible Dragoons,” in the state militia. After  coming to Nauvoo he joined the Church and was the most active agent in securing  the city charter. He was a man of some ability, with many human weaknesses, and  was bombastic and self-important. We must give him credit for sincerity of  purpose in joining the Church although, without question, he was seeking  worldly fame; but through later immoral conduct he became most bitter in his  feelings, and an arch-traitor to the cause. His inaugural address, delivered  February 3, 1841, contains many worthy sentiments, but expressed in a spirit of  pedantry which spoiled much of the good effect.

 

Freedom for All

 

The first act passed by the city council of Nauvoo, was a resolution presented  by Joseph Smith thanking the governor, the council of revision and the  legislature of the state of Illinois, “for their unparalleled liberality” for  the powers which the charter conferred. Later, but among the first ordinances  introduced, was one assuring protection to Catholics, Presbyterians, Methodists,  Baptists, Latter-day Saints, and all other religious organizations. As the  ordinance read, they were to have, “free toleration and equal privileges in this  city, and should any person be guilty of ridiculing and abusing, or otherwise  deprecating another, in consequence of his religion, or of disturbing or  interrupting any religious meeting within the limits of this city, he shall, on  conviction before the mayor or municipal court, be considered a disturber of the  public peace, and fined in any sum not to exceed five hundred dollars, or  imprisonment not exceeding six months.” In various other ways were the liberties  and personal rights of the citizens safeguarded against the acts of rowdies,  mobbers, and disturbers of the peace.

 

Notes

 

1.  See table of stakes in appendix.

 

 Chapter 28 Foreign Missionary Labors. 1839 through 1841

 

The Foreign Mission of the Twelve

 

On the 26th day of April, 1839, a majority of the apostles took their leave of  the Saints at Far West then a hostile land to go forth and declare the  everlasting Gospel “over the great waters” as they had been commanded. The  families of these brave men had been recently and ruthlessly banished from their  homes, and were on their journey seeking shelter and a friendly habitation. It  required the greatest courage and the highest quality of faith for men to go  forth across the ocean to a foreign country to preach the Gospel without purse  or scrip, leaving their families in poverty, homeless, destitute, and ill. Yet  this was the test to which these brethren were put at this time. They did not  fail, but manfully and nobly took up their cross and started on their missions.  Other brethren, of the seventies, just as faithful, accompanied them on their  journey to the foreign field.

 

No sooner was the main body of the Saints located in Iowa and Illinois, out of  the reach of mobs, than most of the members of the council of the twelve started  on their way to the British Isles. On the 2nd day of July, 1839, the presidency  met with the apostles, and some others who were to accompany them, and gave them  instructions pertaining to their labors. On this occasion many important items  on doctrine, the Priesthood, and the deportment of missionaries in the field,  were discussed. In the course of his instructions President Joseph Smith taught  them to beware of self-sufficiency, and to observe charity and wisdom and to  exercise the principle of mercy; for if we forgive our brother, or even an  enemy, before he repent or ask forgiveness, our heavenly Father will be equally  merciful unto us. He further instructed them that they were not sent out to be  taught, but to teach, and to be honest, open and frank, in all intercourse with  mankind. He closed his instructions with the following words:

 

 “I will give you one of the keys of the mysteries of the kingdom. It is an  eternal principle, that has existed with God from all eternity: That man who  rises up to condemn others, finding fault with the Church, saying they are out  of the way, while he himself is righteous, then know assuredly, that that man is  in the high road to apostasy and if he does not repent will apostatize, as God  lives. The principle is as correct as the one that Jesus put forth in saying  that he who seeketh a sign is an adulterous person; and that principle is  eternal, undeviating, and firm as the pillars of heaven; for whenever you see a  man seeking after a sign, you may set it down that he is an adulterous man.”

 

Items on Priesthood

 

About this time he also instructed the brethren on various matters of  Priesthood, from which the following excerpts are taken:

 

 “The Priesthood was first given to Adam; he obtained the First Presidency, and  held the keys of it from generation to generation. He obtained it in the  creation, before the world was formed.  . . . He is Michael the Archangel,  spoken of in the scriptures. Then to Noah, who is Gabriel; he stands next in  authority to Adam in the Priesthood; he was called of God to this office, and  was the father of all living in his day, and to him was given the dominion.  These men held keys first on earth, and then in heaven.

 

“The Priesthood is an everlasting principle, and existed with God from eternity,  and will to eternity, without beginning of days or end of years. The keys have  to be brought from heaven whenever the Gospel is sent. When they are revealed  from heaven, it is by Adam’s authority.

 

“Daniel in his seventh chapter speaks of the Ancient of Days; he means the  oldest man, our father, Adam, Michael; he will call his children together and  hold a council with them to prepare them for the coming of the Son of Man. He  (Adam) is the father of the human family, and presides over the spirits of all  men and all that have had the keys must stand before him in this grand council.  This may take place before some of us leave this stage of action. The Son of Man  stands before him, and there is given him glory and dominion. Adam delivers up  his stewardship to Christ, that which was delivered to him as holding the keys  of the universe, but retains his standing as head of the human family. . . .

 

“The keys were first given to him and by him to others. He will have to give an  account of his stewardship, and they to him.

 

“The Priesthood is everlasting. The Savior, Moses, and Elias, gave the keys to  Peter, James and John, on the mount, when they were transfigured before him. . .  .

 

“Christ is the Great High Priest, Adam next.”1

 

Epistle of the Twelve

 

After receiving their charge from the First Presidency, before their departure  for their fields of labor, the members of the council of the twelve, wrote an  epistle to the elders of the Church, the churches scattered abroad, and all the  Saints, giving them instruction: and encouragement in their afflictions. To the  Saints they said:

 

 “We wish to stimulate all the brethren to faithfulness; you have been, tried,  you are now being tried; and those trials, if you are not watchful, will corrode  the minds, and produce unpleasant feelings; but recollect that now is the time  of trial; soon the victory will be ours. Now may be a day of lamentation then  will be a day of rejoicing. Now may be a day of sorrow but by and by we shall  see the Lord; our sorrow will be turned into joy, and our joy no man taketh from  us.”

 

To the elders they said:

 

 “God has called you to an important office. He has laid upon you an onerous  duty. He has called you to an holy calling, even to be the priests of the Most  High God, messengers to the nations of the earth; and upon your diligence, your  perseverance and faithfulness, the soundness of the doctrines which you preach,  the moral precepts that you advance and practice, and upon the sound principles  that you inculcate, while you hold that Priesthood, hang the destinies of the  human family. You are the men that God has called to spread forth his kingdom.  He has committed the care of souls to your charge, and when you received this  Priesthood, you became the legates of heaven; and the Great God demands it of  you, that you should be faithful; and inasmuch as you are not, you will not be  chosen; but it will be said unto you, ‘Stand by and let a more honorable man  than thou art take thy place and receive thy crown.’”

 

The Missionaries Depart

 

At a meeting held in Commerce, Sunday, July 7, 1839, Elders Brigham Young, John  Taylor, John E. Page, Wilford Woodruff and Orson Hyde, made their farewell  remarks before their departure on their foreign mission. The following day  Elders Taylor and Woodruff took up their journey toward their field of labor.  Sunday, July 28, Elder Parley P. Pratt, who had arrived in Commerce on the 10th  from his long confinement in Missouri prisons, made his farewell talk; so also  did his brother Orson, who had assisted Parley in his escape. August 29, Elders  Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt and Hiram Clark left Commerce on their missionary  journey, and they were followed September 18, by President Brigham Young and  Elder Heber C. Kimball. Elders George A. Smith, Reuben Hedlock and Theodore  Turley, left three days later. William Smith, of the council of the twelve,  failed to go. Willard Richards, not yet ordained an apostle, was in England  where he had remained since the opening of the mission. Elders Orson Hyde and  John E. Page were shortly afterwards set apart for a mission to Palestine to  dedicate the land for the return of the Jews, and there was one vacancy in the  council caused by the death of David W. Patten, which was not filled until  April, 1841, when Lyman Wight was chosen.

 

Circumstances under which these brethren departed were extremely distressing, as  may be well imagined. Elder Heber C. Kimball thus reports the departure of  President Brigham Young and himself on their missionary journey:

 

 “September 14, President Brigham Young left his home at Montrose to start on the  mission to England. He was so sick that he was unable to go to the Mississippi,  a distance of thirty rods, without assistance. After he had crossed the river he  rode behind Israel Barlow on his horse to my house, where he continued sick  until the 18th. He left his wife sick with a babe only three weeks old, and all  his other children were sick and unable to wait upon each other. Not one soul of  them was able to go to the well for a pail of water, and they were without a  second suit to their backs, for the mob in Missouri had taken nearly all he had.  On the 17th Sister Mary Ann Young got a boy to carry her up in his wagon to my  house, that she might nurse and comfort Brother Brigham to the hour of starting.

 

“September 18, Charles Hubbard sent his boy with a wagon and a span of horses to  my house; our trunks were put into the wagon by some brethren; I went to my bed  and shook hands with my wife who was then shaking with a chill, having two  children lying sick by her side; I embraced her and my children, and bade them  farewell. My only well child was little Heber P., and it was with difficulty he  could carry a couple of quarts of water at a time, to assist in quenching their  thirst.

 

“It was with difficulty we got into the wagon, and started down the hill about  ten rods; it appeared to me as though my very inmost parts would melt within me  at leaving my family in such a condition, as it were almost in the arms of  death. I felt as though I could not endure it. I asked the teamster to stop, and  said to Brother Brigham, ‘This is pretty tough, isn’t it; let’s rise up and give  them a cheer.’ We arose, and swinging our hats three times over our heads,  shouted: ‘Hurrah, Hurrah for Israel.’ Vilate, hearing the noise, arose from her  bed and came to the door. She had a smile on her face. Vilate and Mary Ann Young  cried out to us: ‘Goodby, God bless you.’ We returned the compliment, and then  told the driver to go ahead. After this I felt a spirit of joy and gratitude,  having had the satisfaction of seeing my wife standing upon her feet, instead of  leaving her in bed, knowing well that I should not see them again for two or  three years” (“Life of Heber C. Kimball,” p. 275).

 

The conditions of some of the other brethren were little better. Elders George  A. Smith and companions upset their wagons in the soft ground before they got  out of sight of the village of Commerce, and Elders Smith and Turley were so  weak they could not get up, and Brother Hedlock had to lift them into the wagon  again. Soon after, as they were on their way, some gentlemen passing them asked  who had been robbing the burying ground; so miserable did they appear.2 After  passing through many hardships, traveling without purse or scrip, the Lord  coming to their assistance many times in a miraculous way, these brethren  finally reached their destination. Elders John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff and  Theodore Turley arrived in Liverpool, January 11, 1840, and were followed by  President Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt, George  A. Smith and Reuben Hedlock, who arrived April 6, after a stormy passage of  twenty-eight days. At the time of sailing, President Young and Elder Kimball  were still in poor health, and Elder George A. Smith was suffering extremely  with ague. It was impossible for the brethren journeying on this mission to go  together in a body, and inadvisable. Due to sickness they were detained many  days, yet they pursued their course as rapidly as circumstances would permit. As  President Young and party left the New York harbor, the shore resounded by the  voices of the assembled Saints who had come to bid them farewell on their  journey. They unitedly sang: “The Gallant Ship is under Way,” composed by Elder  William W. Phelps.

 

Ordination of Willard Richards

 

The first council meeting of the apostles on foreign soil was held in Preston,  England, April 14, 1840, at the house of Elder Willard Richards, who on this  occasion was ordained to the apostleship by President Brigham Young, and under  the hands of all the brethren of the council who were present. Other business  was transacted and the brethren assigned to fields of labor. On this occasion  Brigham Young was also unanimously sustained by the brethren of the twelve as  the president of that council. There were present: President Brigham Young,  Heber C. Kimball, Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff,  George A. Smith and Willard Richards.

 

The Millennial Star

 

A general conference of all the Saints in the British Isles was held in Preston  the following day, April 15, 1840, at which there were present, or represented,  the following: elders, 36; priests, 45; teachers, 36: deacons, 11; members,  1686, all contained in 34 branches which had been raised up since the opening of  that mission by Elder Kimball and companions in 1837. At this conference it was  decided to publish a hymn book, and a monthly periodical under the direction and  superintendency of the twelve, for the benefit and information of the members  of the Church. The next day, in a council meeting of the apostles, Parley P.  Pratt was chosen to edit the monthly periodical which was to be called “The  Latter-day Saints’ Millennial Star,” which soon made its appearance and has been  issued continuously ever since. The committee selected to prepare for printing a  book of hymns was Brigham Young, Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor.

 

British Copyright of the Book of Mormon

 

It was also decided, agreeable to the counsel of the First Presidency previously  obtained, that copyright of the Book of Mormon and of the Doctrine and Covenants  be secured in England; and that editions of these books be printed. The first  number of the  Millennial Star was issued in Manchester, in pamphlet form of  twenty-four pages, Wednesday, May 27, 1840. Later the place of publication was  transferred to Liverpool, which became the headquarters for most of the  publications of the Church, until comparatively recent years.

 

The First Patriarch in England

 

Under the labors of the twelve and their missionary companions, branches of the  Church had sprung up in various parts of England, and the population of the  Church was now growing rapidly. At another council meeting of the twelve, held  April 16, 1840, it was decided that a patriarch be ordained, and the honor fell  to the lot of Elder Peter Melling, a most worthy man, who was ordained in  Preston the following day. Early in 1841, John Albiston was also ordained to  this sacred calling.

 

Individual Labors of the Twelve

 

Elders John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff and-Theodore Turley, the first of the  missionaries to arrive in England, met in a special council Friday, January 17,  1840, with Joseph Fielding and Willard Richards of the presidency of the British  Mission, and decided on their fields of labor. It was agreed that Elders Taylor  and Fielding should go to Liverpool; Elder Hiram Clark, to Manchester, with  Elder William Clayton; and Brother Richards to labor where the Spirit should  direct. In Liverpool Elders Taylor and Fielding raised up a branch of about  thirty members before the arrival from America of the other brethren of the  twelve. This number rapidly increased and at the beginning of the year 1841,  numbered more than two hundred souls. In March, 1842, the headquarters of the  mission were transferred to Liverpool.

 

In Herefordshire

 

In the Potteries of Staffordshire, Elders Woodruff and Turley found a fruitful  field. Elder Woodruff labored in Burslem, Hanley, Stoke, Lane End and the  Potteries from the 22nd of January, 1840, to the 2nd of March, preaching every  night in the week, and two or three times on the Sabbath day, and the people  flocked to hear his words and many were baptized. While preaching on the  Sabbath, March 1, which was the anniversary of his birth, the Lord manifested to  him that he was to leave that part of the country and go to the south. Acting on  the impression from the Spirit, he left on the 3rd of March and continued his  journey to the farming communities of Herefordshire and stopped at the home of  Mr. John Benbow, at Castle Frome, Ledbury. Mr. Benbow was a wealthy farmer,  cultivating some three hundred acres of land. Elder Woodruff presented himself  to this gentleman as a missionary from America and an elder of the Church of  Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who had been sent to preach the Gospel to him  and his household and all the inhabitants of the land. Mr. Benbow rejoiced in  the statements of Elder Woodruff, and informed him that there were in that place  six hundred persons and more, who had broken off from the Methodists and had  taken the name of “United Brethren.” They had forty-five preachers and a number  of meeting houses that were duly licensed according to the law of the land. They  were searching for light and truth. Losing no time, on the morning of the 5th,  Brother Woodruff stated he would like to begin his labors by preaching to the  people. There was a large hall in the mansion of Mr. Benbow, which was available  for that purpose, and the people were invited to come and hear the new message,  from the new world across the sea. The people of the neighborhood deserted their  ministers and came to hear this strange preacher, who, in the course of a short  time, baptized over six hundred persons in that place. At the meeting held on  March 8, a constable, sent through complaint of the parish rector, came to  arrest him for “preaching to the people.” Elder Woodruff said he had a license  to preach as well as the rector, and if the constable would take a chair and sit  beside him until the close of the meeting he would be at his service. He then  launched forth on a discourse treating the first principles of the Gospel, and  at the close of the meeting opened the door for baptism, and several came  forward to be baptized; among the number were four preachers and the constable,  who said, “Mr. Woodruff, I would like to be baptized.” The constable went to the  rector and told him that if he wanted Mr. Woodruff arrested, he must go himself  and serve the writ, for he had heard him preach the only true Gospel sermon he  had ever heard. The rector then sent two clerks of the Church of England as  spies, and they were both baptized. The ministers and rectors of the Church of  England then sent a petition to the Archbishop of Canterbury, to request  Parliament to pass a law prohibiting the “Mormons” from preaching in the British  nation, stating that they had baptized fifteen hundred persons, many of whom  were members of the Church of England. But the Archbishop, knowing well that the  laws of England permitted religious freedom, replied that the petitioners, if  they had the worth of souls at heart as much as they valued ground where hares,  foxes and hounds ran, they would not lose so many of their flock.

 

The other brethren also met with remarkable success. The field was ripe, ready  for the harvest, and thousands of the house of Israel were soon gathered into  the fold. At a conference of the Church in the British Isles held in October,  1840, there was reported a Church membership of about 4,000 souls, and in the  meantime a number had emigrated to the United States.

 

The First Emigration to the United States

 

In June, 1840, a company of forty Saints sailed in the ship Britannia from  Liverpool for New York, being the first Saints to leave England for Zion.

 

The Mission to Palestine

 

At the general conference of the Church held in Nauvoo, Hancock County, April  6 through 8, 1840, Elder Orson Hyde, who had not departed for England with the other  apostles, was appointed to take a mission to Palestine to dedicate there the  land for the gathering of the Jews. Elder John E. Page, who had also tarried at  home, was called to accompany him. While addressing the congregation on the 6th,  Elder Hyde remarked that it had been prophesied, some years before, that he had  a great work to perform among the Jews; and that he had recently been moved by  the Spirit of the Lord to visit that people, and gather all the information he  could find respecting their movements, hopes and aspirations, and communicate  them to the Church. He expressed the desire to visit the Jews in New York,  London and Amsterdam, on his way to the field of his appointment. It was moved  and carried that he proceed at once on his mission and that Elder John E. Page  be given proper credentials and accompany him. On the 15th of April, Elder Hyde  left Nauvoo for Jerusalem. Working his way across the country to New York, he  sailed, after some delays, for Liverpool, on his way to Palestine, Saturday,  February 13, 1841. He traveled alone, as Elder John E. Page had failed to make  the journey.

 

Other Missionary Appointments

 

Other missionary appointments to foreign fields were made in these early days.  In July, 1840, William Barrett, a boy seventeen years of age, was ordained an  elder by Elders George A. Smith and Alfred Cordon, in Hanley, Staffordshire,  England, and set apart to take a mission to Australia, to be the first  missionary to that country. In August, following, Elder William Donaldson, of  the British army, having been assigned to the field in India, was also blessed  and set apart to labor for the Church in that land. The following year, at the  conference of the Church, Elder Harrison Sagers was called to go to Jamaica;  Elder Joseph Ball, to South America; Elder Simeon Carter to Germany; and Elder  Arza Adams to Canada, where the Gospel had previously been preached.

 

The Return of the Apostles

 

On the 20th day of April, 1841, President Brigham Young and Elders Heber C.  Kimball, Orson Pratt, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff, George A. Smith and Willard  Richards, with a company of Saints left Liverpool on the ship Rochester, for New  York. Parley P. Pratt continued in England to edit the  Millennial Star and  preside over the mission. After a period of one month upon the water they  arrived safely in New York, and continuing their journey arrived in Nauvoo, July  1, 1841. Some eighteen or twenty months before, these brethren had left Nauvoo,  poverty-stricken, afflicted and sorrowful of heart. Now they returned rejoicing  and with gladness of heart, bearing the fruit of their labors. They started on  their way without money, and returned with none. Yet, during their labors  abroad, they had published an edition of five thousand copies of the Book of  Mormon; and an edition of three thousand copies of the Hymn Book; over fifty  thousand tracts and pamphlets; had established a permanent magazine, the  Millennial Star; organized an emigration agency for the gathering of the Saints  to Zion, and had been instrumental in the hands of the Lord in bringing  thousands of the children of the House of Israel to a knowledge of the  everlasting Gospel. Truly it was a marvelous work, worthy of all commendation.

 

The Prophet’s Comments

 

Commenting on the labors of these members of the council of the apostles, the  Prophet said:

 

 “All the quorum of the Twelve Apostles who were expected here this season, with  the exception of Elders Willard Richards and Wilford Woodruff, have arrived. We  have listened to the accounts which they give of their success, and the  prosperity of the work of the Lord in Great Britain with pleasure. They  certainly have been the instruments in the hands of God of accomplishing much,  and must have the satisfaction of knowing that they have done their duty.  Perhaps no men ever undertook such an important mission under such peculiarly  distressing and unpropitious circumstances. Most of them when they left this  place, nearly two years ago, were worn down with sickness and disease, or were  taken sick on the road. Several of their families were also afflicted and needed  their aid and support. But, knowing that they had been called by the God of  Heaven to preach the Gospel to other nations, they conferred not with flesh and  blood, but obedient to the heavenly mandate, without purse or scrip, they  commenced a journey of five thousand miles entirely dependent on the providence  of that God who had called them to such a holy calling. While journeying to the  seaboard they were brought into many trying circumstances; after a short  recovery from severe sickness, they would be taken with a relapse, and have to  stop among strangers, without money and without friends. Their lives were  several times despaired of, and they have taken each other by the hand,  expecting it would be the last time they should behold one another in the flesh.  However, notwithstanding their afflictions and trials, the Lord always  interposed in their behalf, and did not suffer them to sink in the arms of  death. Some way or other was made for their escape  friends rose up when they  most needed them and relieved their necessities; and thus they were enabled to  pursue their journey and rejoice in the Holy One of Israel. They truly ‘went  forth weeping, bearing precious seed,’ but have returned with rejoicing, bearing  their sheaves with them” (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 4: 390).

 

Notes

 

1.  Documentary History of the Church, vol. 3:385  through 8.

 

 2. Another incident worthy to relate is the following statement by Elder Wilford  Woodruff:

 

 “Inasmuch as the devil had been thwarted in a measure by the twelve going to Far  West and returning without harm, it seemed as though the destroyer was  determined to make some other attempt upon us to hinder us from performing our  missions; for as soon as any one of the apostles began to prepare for starting  he was smitten with chills and fever, or sickness of some kind. . .  .

 

 “On the 25th of July, I was attacked with chills and fever, for the first time  in my life; this I had every other day, and whenever attacked I was laid  prostrate. My wife, Phoebe, was also taken down with the chills and fever, as  were quite a number of the twelve. . . .

 

 “Although feeble, I walked to the banks of the Mississippi River; there  President Young took me in a canoe and paddled me across the river. When we  landed, I lay down on a side of sole leather, by the post office, to rest.  Brother Joseph, the Prophet of God, came along and looked at me. ‘Well, Brother  Woodruff,’ said he, ‘you have started upon your mission.’ ‘Yes,’ said I, ‘but I  feel and look more like a subject for the dissecting room than a missionary.’  Joseph replied: ‘What did you say that for? Get up, and go along; all will be  right with you. . . .

 

 “Soon a brother came along with a wagon, and took us (Elders Taylor and  Woodruff) in. As we were driving through the place, we came to Parley P. Pratt,  who was stripped to his shirt and pants, with his head and feet bare. He was  hewing a log, preparatory to building a cabin. He said: ‘Brother Woodruff, I  have no money, but I have an empty purse, which I will give you.’ He brought it  to me, and I thanked him for it. We went a few rods further and met Brother  Heber C. Kimball, in the same condition, also hewing a log to build a cabin. He  said: ‘As Parley has given you a purse, I have got a dollar I will give you to  put in it.’ He gave me both a dollar and a blessing” (Wilford Woodruff His Life  and Labors, p. 108).

 

 Chapter 29 Appeal to Washington for Redress. Further Missouri Persecutions. 1839 through 1840

 

Importuning for Redress

 

Having appealed in vain to the courts, the governor and the legislature of  Missouri, the Saints now determined to “importune for redress and redemption at  the feet of the President.” This course the Lord commanded them to take. It was  his will that the national government should have the privilege of correcting  the wrongs of the Latter-day Saints, or share in the responsibility of their  persecutions, should they also turn a deaf ear to the appeal of thousands of  citizens, who had been banished from their homes.1 The Constitution guarantees  that “the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and  immunities of citizens of the several states.” This great privilege had been  denied the Latter-day Saints by the officers of the State of Missouri.

 

President Sidney Rigdon arrived in Quincy, Illinois, after his release from  prison, in March, 1839, and was at that time very zealous for the punishment of  Missouri for the violation of the constitutional rights of the Saints while in  that state. He devised a plan, on an elaborate scale, for the impeachment of  Missouri before the other states and the general government. He proposed to have  the governors of the several states present before their respective legislative  bodies the matter of Missouri’s abdication of republican government, and at the  same time have presented to the President of the United States and Congress a  petition for redress of the wrongs inflicted upon the Saints. Governor Carlin of  Illinois encouraged him in this desire and promised to aid in the work. Governor  Robert Lucas of Iowa also lent some assistance to the plan. The latter issued  letters of introduction to President Martin Van Buren and Governor Shannon of  Ohio, conveying the information that President Rigdon expected to visit  Washington as the representative of the “Mormon” people to seek an investigation  into the causes for the expulsion of the Saints from Missouri. However, nothing  came of this rather impractical plan.

 

The Prophet’s Appeal to the People

 

About this same time (April, 1839) the Prophet made an appeal to the citizens of  the United States in the following language:

 

 “I ask the citizens of this Republic whether such a state of things is to be  suffered to pass unnoticed, and the hearts of widows, orphans, and patriots to  be broken, and their wrongs left without redress? No! I invoke the genius of our  Constitution. I appeal to the patriotism of Americans to stop this unlawful and  unholy procedure; and pray that God may defend this nation from the dreadful  effects of such outrages.

 

“Is there no virtue in the body politic? Will not the people rise up in their  majesty, and with that promptitude and zeal which are so characteristic of them,  discountenance such proceedings, by bringing the offenders to that punishment  which they so richly deserve, and save the nation from that disgrace and  ultimate ruin, which otherwise must inevitably fall upon it?”2

 

A Delegation Appointed to Visit Washington

 

At a conference of the Church held in Quincy in May, 1839, President Rigdon was  formally appointed to carry the message of grievances to Washington, and Elder  Lyman Wight was appointed to collect the necessary affidavits from those  injured, to be presented at Washington. President Rigdon made no great effort to  get away on this mission, and as time passed his ardor cooled and his desire to  fill his appointment lessened. At the October Conference, held at Commerce,  President Joseph Smith, who had arrived in Illinois during the summer, and  Judge Elias Higbee were also chosen to go to Washington as well as Sidney  Rigdon, to importune for redress. On the 29th of October, these three delegates  left Commerce in a carriage driven by Orrin Porter Rockwell, with the intention  of laying before Congress the grievances of the Saints while in Missouri. At  Quincy they were joined by Dr. Robert D. Foster who accompanied them on their  way to administer to Sidney Rigdon, who was ill. At Springfield Judge James  Adams took the Prophet to his home and treated him with every consideration as  though he had been his own son. After an eventful journey the Prophet and Judge  Higbee arrived in Washington, November 28, 1839. They did considerable preaching  on the way and were forced to leave Sidney Rigdon in Ohio because of his  sickness; Orrin P. Rockwell and Dr. Robert D. Foster remained with him.

 

Interview with the President

 

The first step taken by the Prophet and Judge Higbee after securing a boarding  place was to call on the President of the United States, Martin Van Buren. This  was the following day, November 29. They proceeded to the house of the  President, which they state they found to be a very large and splendid palace,  decorated with all the fineries and elegance of this world. After some  preliminary arrangements they were ushered into the presence of Mr. Van Buren.  They handed him some of their letters of introduction which stated the object of  their visit and as soon as the President read one of them, he looked up with a  frown and said: “What can I do? I can do nothing for you! If I do anything, I  shall come in contact with the whole state of Missouri.” The delegates were not  to be denied a hearing without some effort, so they pressed the matter of their  case with considerable vigor. The result was that President Van Buren promised  to reconsider what he had said, and expressed deep sympathy with the Saints on  account of their suffering.

 

The Petition before Congress

 

Following the interview with the President the brethren spent some time hunting  up senators and representatives with whom they might converse and receive a  hearing. They found the delegation from Illinois friendly, and were able to make  a number of friends among the honorable gentlemen in Washington. A meeting was  held with the congressional delegation from Illinois, for the purpose of  considering the best means for getting their business before Congress. Mr.  Robinson, of the delegation, offered some opposition against the Saints  presenting any claims against Missouri to be liquidated by the United States, on  the ground that the Saints should make their appeal to the judiciary of Missouri  and the state officials, where the wrongs were committed. The Prophet opposed  such a stand with great vigor, explaining that every effort had already been  made to get the governor of Missouri and the courts to consider their claims,  but without result. Mr. Robinson then said this was his first impression of the  matter, but he would take it under consideration. The following day another  meeting was held and it was decided that a petition should be drawn up to be  presented to Congress, and Senator Richard M. Young, of Illinois, promised to  present it in the United States Senate. They were advised that all facts  presented should be authenticated by affidavits, so word was sent to the Saints  in Illinois to prepare immediately such necessary information as would be  required.3  The petition was duly presented to the judiciary committee. It  covered the outrages against the members of the Church from the expulsion from  Jackson County, in 1833, to the banishment from the state in 1838  through 39. The  dastardly course of Governor Boggs in aiding the enemies of the Saints and his  exterminating order received proper consideration. The concluding paragraphs of  this petition are as follows:

 

 “For these wrongs, the ‘Mormons’ ought to have some redress: yet how and where  shall they seek and obtain it? Your constitution guarantees to every citizen,  even the humblest, the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property. It promises to  all, religious freedom, the right to all to worship God beneath their own vine  and fig tree, according to the dictates of their conscience. It guarantees to  all the citizens of the several states the right to become citizens of any one  of the states, and to enjoy all the rights and immunities of the citizens of the  state of his adoption. Yet of all these rights have the ‘Mormons’ been deprived.  They have, without a cause, without a trial, been deprived of life, liberty and  property. They have been persecuted for their religious opinions. They have been  driven from the state of Missouri, at the point of the bayonet, and prevented  from enjoying and exercising the rights of citizens of the state of Missouri. It  is the theory of our laws, that for the protection of every legal right, there  is provided a legal remedy. What then, we would respectfully ask, is the remedy  of the ‘Mormons’? Shall they apply to the legislature of the state of Missouri  for redress? They have done so. They have petitioned, and these petitions have  been treated with silence and contempt. Shall they apply to the federal courts?  They were, at the time of the injury, citizens of the state of Missouri. Shall  they apply to the court of the state of Missouri? Whom shall they sue? The order  for their destruction, then extermination, was granted by the executive of the  state of Missouri. Is not this a plea of justification for the loss of  individuals, done in pursuance of that order? If not, before whom shall the  ‘Mormons’ institute a trial? Shall they summon a jury of the individuals who  composed the mob? An appeal to them were in vain. They dare not go to Missouri  to institute a suit; their lives would be in danger.

 

“For ourselves we see no redress, unless it is awarded by the Congress of the  United States. And here we make our appeal as American Citizens, as  Christians,  and as Men believing that the high sense of justice which exists in your  honorable body, will not allow such oppression to be practiced upon any portion  of the citizens of this vast republic with impunity; but that some measures  which your wisdom may dictate, may be taken, so that the great body of people  who have been thus abused, may have redress for the wrongs which they have  suffered. And to your decision they look with confidence; hoping it may be such  as shall tend to dry up the tears of the widow and orphan, and again place in  situations of peace, those who have been driven from their homes, and have had  to wade through scenes of sorrow and distress.

 

“And your Memorialists, as in duty bound, will ever pray.”

 

The Prophet’s Interview with President Van Buren

 

While the Prophet was waiting for the action of Congress, he visited several  branches of the Church in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and other parts, returning to  Washington the fore part of February. During this time he had another interview  with President Martin Van Buren and one with John C. Calhoun, and he records the  following in his journal:

 

 “During my stay I had an interview with Martin Van Buren, the President, who  treated me very insolently, and it was with great reluctance he listened to our  message, which, when he had heard, he said: ‘Gentlemen, your cause is just, but  I can do nothing for you;’ and ‘If I take up for you I shall lose the vote of  Missouri.’ His whole course went to show that he was an office-seeker, that  self-aggrandizement was his ruling passion, and that justice and righteousness  were no part of his composition. I found him such a man as I could not  conscientiously support at the head of our noble Republic. I also had an  interview with Mr. John C. Calhoun, whose conduct towards me very ill became his  station. I became satisfied there was little use for me to tarry, to press the  just claims of the Saints on the consideration of the President and Congress,  and stayed but a few days, taking passage in company with Porter Rockwell and  Dr. Foster on the railroad and stages back to Dayton, Ohio” (Documentary History  of the Church, vol. 4:80).

 

The Action of Congress

 

Judge Elias Higbee remained in Washington during the time the petition was  before Congress. He met on several occasions with the judiciary committee, which  had the matter in hand. The members from Missouri offered considerable  opposition, as naturally might be supposed, to the charges made against the  officials of that state. They did all in their power to prevent any  consideration of the petition. Many false statements and charges were made which  Judge Higbee was able to refute. On the 26th of February, he wrote the Prophet  as follows: “I am just informed by General Wall (the chairman of the committee),  before whom, or to whom, our business is referred, that the decision is against  us, or in other words unfavorable, that they believe redress can only be had in  Missouri, the courts and the legislature.” On the 4th of March, 1840, President  Joseph Smith arrived in Nauvoo. The same day the senate committee made its  report. After setting forth some of the items in the petition the committee  said:

 

 “The petition is drawn up at great length, and sets forth, with feeling and  eloquence, the wrongs of which they complain; justifies their own conduct, and  aggravates that of those whom they call their persecutors, and concludes by  saying they see no redress, unless it be obtained of the Congress of the United  States, to whom they make their solemn, last appeal, as American citizens, as  Christians, and as men; to which decision they say they will submit.

 

“The committee have examined the case presented by the petition, and heard the  views urged by their agent, with care and attention; and after full examination  and consideration, unanimously concur in the opinion

 

“That the case presented for their investigation is not such a one as will  justify or authorize any interposition by this government.

 

“The wrongs complained of are not alleged to be committed by any of the officers  of the United States, or under the authority of its government in any manner  whatever. The allegations in the petition relate to the acts of its citizens,  and inhabitants and authorities of the State of Missouri, of which state the  petitioners were at the time citizens, or inhabitants.

 

“The grievances complained of in the petition are alleged to have been done  within the territory of the State of Missouri. The committee, under these  circumstances, have not considered themselves justified in inquiring into the  truth or falsehood of the facts charged in the petition. If they are true, the  petitioners must seek relief in the courts of judication of the State of  Missouri, or of the United States, which has the appropriate jurisdiction to  administer full and adequate redress for the wrongs complained of, and doubtless  will do so fairly and impartially; or the petitioners may, if they see proper,  apply to the justice and magnanimity of the State of Missouri an appeal which  the committee feel justified in believing will never be made in vain by the  injured or oppressed.

 

“It can never be presumed that a state either wants the power or lacks the  disposition to redress the wrongs of its own citizens, committed within her own  territory, whether they proceed from the lawless acts of her officers or of any  other persons. The committee therefore report that they recommend the passage of  the following resolution:

 

“Resolved, That the committee on the judiciary be discharged from further  consideration of the memorial in this case; and that the memorialists have leave  to withdraw the papers which accompany their memorial” (Documentary History of  the Church, vol. 4:90 through 2).

 

Compliance with the Word of the Lord

 

The Senate, of course, adopted this resolution, and this brought to an end the  appeal of the Latter-day Saints for redress of their wrongs while in Missouri.4  The Saints had the satisfaction of knowing they had complied with the command of  the Lord, wherein he instructed them to appeal for redress, first at the feet of  the judge, then the governor and then the President of the United States. The  matter was now to be left in the hand of the Great Judge who had promised, under  the circumstances as they had developed, to “come forth out of his hiding  place, and in his fury vex the nation” (Doc. and Cov. 101:89).

 

The Resolutions of the April Conference

 

At the general conference of the Church held April 6  through 8, 1840, a set of  resolutions were adopted approving of the labors of the Church committee who  visited Washington, and condemning the action of the senate in the rejection of  the consideration of the wrongs of the Saints. Some of the items in which the  resolutions disagree with the action of Congress are as follows: The failure to  consider the petition was subversive to the rights of a free people, and justly  called for the disapprobation of all the supporters and lovers of good  government. The judiciary committee stated in their report, “that our memorial  aggravates the case of our oppressors,” and at the same time they said they had  “not examined into the truth or falsehood of the facts mentioned.” This was  deemed by the petitioners a great insult to their “good sense, better judgment  and intelligence,” when numerous affidavits were laid before the committee to  prove that the Saints could go into the State of Missouri only in opposition to  the exterminating order of the governor, and at the risk of their lives.  Moreover, that exterminating order was before the committee for consideration,  it was a direct infraction of the Constitution of the United States. The failure  of the committee to investigate the actions of the governor and other officers  of Missouri, was “turning a deaf ear to the cries of widows, orphans, and  innocent blood, which had been shed,” and was “no less than seconding the  proceedings of that murderous clan, whose deeds are recorded in heaven, and  justly call down upon their heads the righteous judgments of an offended God.”  The thanks of the Saints were extended to Governors Lucas of Iowa, and Carlin of  Illinois, for their sympathy and aid, also to the citizens of Illinois for their  kind, liberal and generous conduct. The delegates were instructed to continue  their endeavors to obtain redress, and the resolutions closed with the following  appeal: “And if all hopes of obtaining satisfaction for the injuries done us be  entirely blasted, that they (the delegates) then appeal our case to the Court of  Heaven, believing that the Great Jehovah, who rules over the destiny of nations,  and who notices the falling sparrows, will undoubtedly redress our wrongs, and  ere long avenge us of our adversaries.”5

 

Return of the Prodigals

 

At the general conference held in April, 1840, Frederick G. Williams, who had  been excommunicated by the action of the conference of the Church at Quincy,  March 17, 1839, along with Thomas B. Marsh, George M. Hinkle and others,  presented himself on the stand, and humbly asked forgiveness for his conduct  while in Missouri. He expressed his determination to do the will of the Lord in  the future, for he had a knowledge of the divinity of the work. His case was  presented to the people by President Hyrum Smith, and he was received back into  fellowship by the unanimous vote of the conference. From this time on he  remained true to the Church and his brethren, until his death in Quincy October  10, 1842.

 

In the following June William W. Phelps wrote to the Prophet from Dayton, Ohio,  confessing his sins and begging for reinstatement in the Church. “I am,” said  he, “as the prodigal son, though I never doubt or disbelieve the fulness of the  Gospel. I have been greatly abused and humbled, and I blessed the God of Israel  when I lately read your prophetic blessing on my head, as follows: ‘The Lord  will chasten him because he taketh honor to himself, and when his soul is  greatly humbled he will forsake the evil. Then shall the light of the Lord break  forth upon him as at noonday and in him shall be no darkness.’ I have seen the  folly of my way, and I tremble at the gulf I have passed. So it is, and why I  know not. I prayed, and God answered; but what could I do? Says I, ‘I will  repent and live and ask my old brethren to forgive me, and though they chasten  me to death, yet I will die with them, for their God is my God. . . . I have not  walked along with my friends according to my holy anointing. I ask forgiveness  in the name of Jesus Christ of all the Saints, for I will do right, God helping  me.’”

 

The Prophet answered him saying his case had been presented to the Saints and an  expression of their feelings was unanimously given that he should be received  back into the Church.

 

Death of Bishop Partridge

 

Bishop Edward Partridge died Wednesday, May 27, 1840, in Nauvoo, in the  forty-sixth year of his age. He was the first bishop of the Church, having been  called to that position by revelation in 1831. He was born in Berkshire County,  Massachusetts, August 27, 1793. His daughter Harriet Pamela, aged nineteen  years, preceded her father to the grave by eleven days. They were victims of the  Missouri persecutions, and were among those who suffered privations and exposure  in the mobbings and expulsion in the winter of 1838 through 9. Others who likewise laid  down their lives about this time were John Young, father of President Brigham  Young, Seymour Brunson and James Mulholland, the Prophet’s secretary. Each of  these brethren died shortly after the settlement of the Saints in Illinois. John  Young was a veteran of the Revolution. He had been driven from his home in  Missouri and died in his seventy-seventh year, a martyr to his religion, for his  death was caused by his sufferings in the cruel persecution. Seymour Brunson  died August 10, 1840. He was a man of strong character, and had taken an active  part in the Church almost from the beginning, serving in various councils. He it  was who entered charges against Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer at the time of  their excommunication. He died in his forty-first year and was at the time a  member of the high council in the Nauvoo Stake. James Mulholland died in  November, 1839, aged thirty-five years. He was a man of excellent education and  was a faithful elder in the Church.

 

Death of Patriarch Joseph Smith

 

Another victim of Missouri persecution was the Patriarch Joseph Smith, who died  in Nauvoo, September 14, 1840. He was the first person who received the  Prophet’s testimony after the appearance of the angel, and was always true to  the mission of his son. He moved to Kirtland in 1831, where he was ordained  patriarch and an assistant counselor to the Prophet in the Presidency of the  High Priesthood, December 18, 1833. He served as a member of the first high  council in 1834. During the persecutions in Kirtland, in 1837, he was made a  prisoner by the apostate enemies of the Church, but gained his liberty and made  his way to Far West in 1838. From here he was again driven by enemies under the  exterminating order of the infamous Lilburn W. Boggs. In midwinter he made his  way to Quincy, and later in the spring of 1839, to Commerce, where he made his  home. He was six feet two inches tall, and well proportioned. His ordinary  weight was about two hundred pounds. He was a very strong, active man, but the  exposure he suffered during the expulsion from Missouri, brought on consumption,  from which he died. His funeral services were held September 15, 1840, Elder  Robert B. Thompson delivering the discourse.

 

More Trouble from Missouri

 

The action of Congress and the President of the United States, in refusing to  consider the complaint, had its effect for evil on the Missourians. Their  hatred, great as it was against the Latter-day Saints, was augmented by the  presentation of the petition of the Saints to the general government. They  seemed to chafe under the exposures to the world of their evil deeds. The action  of Congress also made them bold in their desire to continue their persecutions  of the Saints. If the President of the United States could refuse to give ear to  the appeal of the thousands who had been so wilfully and maliciously wronged;  and if Congress could advise that the proper place for redress was back in  Missouri, and that, too, at the hands of the very officials who had so wickedly  and unconstitutionally expelled, robbed, and murdered the Saints, what was there  for Missourians to fear? Was not this evidence that the “Mormons,” everywhere  hated, were the common prey of their mortal enemies? It is true they had driven  the Saints to the confines of another state, but it was a matter of little  moment to cross that border and drag them back again for further abuse.  Especially so, if they could enter into collusion with the officers of the other  states which they hoped to do, and which they did.

 

Kidnapping of Alanson Brown and Others

 

On the 7th day of July, 1840, Alanson Brown, Benjamin Boyce, Noah Rodgers and  James Allred, were surrounded by an armed force of mobbers, in Hancock County,  Illinois, who asked them if they were “Mormons.” When they said they were, the  mobbers with many vile oaths declared that they were sworn to kill “all the  damned ‘Mormons’ that they could find.” The brethren were forced across the  river to a small town in Lewis County, Missouri, called Tully, where they were  kept under guard until about eleven o’clock at night. Then Alanson Brown and  Benjamin Boyce were taken out to the woods with ropes around their necks. Boyce  inquired what they intended to do and was answered by the mobbers that they were  going to kill them and “make catfish bait” of them. The two brethren were then  separated. Boyce was stripped and tied to a tree and whipped with gads until his  body was mangled from his shoulders to his knees. In the meantime Brown had been  hung by the neck until life appeared to be gone, then the ruffians cut him down,  revived him, and returned to Tully with them both. They then placed ropes on the  necks of Allred and Rodgers and took them out to the woods, where they stripped  them of their clothing and made many threats against their lives. Rodgers was  badly beaten, as Boyce had been, but for some reason the fiends refrained from  whipping Allred. These brethren were then returned to Tully and confined in the  same room with the other two brethren. Brown and Allred were liberated some days  later, but Boyce and Rodgers were confined in irons until the 21st day of  August, when, through the blessings of the Lord, they made their escape.

 

Memorial to Governor Carlin

 

A mass meeting of the citizens of Nauvoo was held July 13, 1840, at which a  committee consisting of Isaac Galland, Robert B. Thompson, Sidney Rigdon and  Daniel H. Wells, drew up resolutions of protest against the treatment accorded  the four men who were kidnapped, which were adopted. The citizens then  memorialized Governor Carlin, petitioning him to take steps to have released the  four men who were then held prisoners in Missouri, and have punished the  perpetrators of the crime. Daniel H. Wells and George Miller waited upon the  governor and laid the case before him. As they recited the story of the  cruelties, the governor’s wife, who was present, was moved to tears, and the  governor promised to take the matter in hand. However, his friendship for the  Saints had greatly cooled and no action was ever taken by Governor Carlin to  release the prisoners, or to bring to justice the perpetrators of the crime.

 

Missouri’s Requisition for the Prophet

 

The next move on the part of Missouri was a requisition made on Governor Carlin  of Illinois, by Governor Lilburn W. Boggs, of Missouri, in September, 1840, for  Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Lyman Wight, Parley P. Pratt, Caleb Baldwin and  Alanson Brown, as fugitives from justice. This came after a silence of nearly  two years, and was the outgrowth of the action taken by Congress. Governor  Carlin complied with this unnatural, illegal and absurd request. When the  sheriff came to serve his papers none of the brethren were found at home. Thus  matters rested until the summer of 1841. On the 4th day of June, 1841, the  Prophet called at the residence of Governor Carlin and had an interview with him  and was treated very kindly. A few hours after his departure the governor sent  the sheriff of Adams County, Thomas King, with a posse, and an officer from  Missouri, to arrest him and deliver him up to the authorities of Missouri. They  found the Prophet about twenty-eight miles south of Nauvoo. Some of the posse,  on discovering the spirit of the officer from Missouri, returned to their homes  in disgust. The party returned to Quincy where the Prophet obtained a writ of  habeas corpus, and Judge Stephen A. Douglas, who providentially happened to be  in Quincy, promised to give a hearing at Monmouth, Warren County, the following  week. The news of the Prophet’s arrest soon spread and a rescuing party was  formed to prevent the Prophet being carried to Missouri, if that attempt should  be made. He returned to Nauvoo in the custody of the sheriff, whom he  entertained at his own house and waited on him, the sheriff, being sick. June 7,  Sheriff King and the Prophet, accompanied by a number of citizens from Nauvoo,  left for Monmouth, seventy-five miles distant, where the trial commenced on the  9th, and concluded the following day. Attorney O. H. Browning, of the defense,  made an eloquent plea closing his remarks in the following words:

 

 “Yes, my eyes have beheld the blood-stained traces of innocent women and  children, in the dreary winter, who had traveled hundreds of miles barefoot,  through frost and snow, to seek a refuge from their savage pursuers. ’Twas a  scene of horror sufficient to enlist sympathy from an adamantine heart. And  shall this unfortunate man, whom their fury has seen proper to select for  sacrifice, be driven into such a savage land and none dare to enlist in the  cause of justice? If there was no other voice under heaven ever to be heard in  this cause, gladly would I stand alone, and proudly spend my last breath in  defense of an oppressed American citizen.”

 

The Decision of Judge Douglas

 

Judge Douglas gave the following decision: That the writ, being once returned to  the executive by the sheriff of Hancock County, was dead, and stood in the same  relationship as any other writ which might issue from the circuit court, and  consequently the defendant could not be held in custody on that writ. On the  question whether or not evidence was admissible, he would not pass, but would  take under advisement, but on the other point, the defendant must be dismissed.  Once again the Prophet Joseph had been freed from the clutches of the inhuman  officials of Missouri.

 

Notes

 

1.  Doc. and Cov. 101:76 through 89.

 

2.  Documentary History of the Church, vol. 3:332.

 

3.  The Saints’ petition to Congress is found on pages 24 through 38 of the Documentary  History of the Church, vol. 4. The affidavits are also found in the same volume,  pages 52 through 73. These should be carefully considered.

 

4.  For the reason why the Saints did not accept the advice of the committee and  appeal to the Federal Courts, see article by Elder B.  H. Roberts, in the  introduction to the Documentary History of the Church, vol. 4, under the caption  “The Appeal of the Church to the National Government for Redress of Wrongs  Suffered in Missouri.”

 

5.  The day of retribution came, at least in part, during the Civil War. For  this account see the introduction of Documentary History of the Church, vol. 3,  under the caption “Retribution,” by B.  H. Roberts.

 

 Chapter 30 The Nauvoo Temple and Ordinances Therein. Important Events. 1840 through 1842

 

The House of the Lord

 

In the various gathering places of the Saints from the days of Kirtland the Lord  commanded that temples to his name should be built. In Jackson County and Far  West, they were prevented from building temples by their enemies, who drove them  from their homes. At the conference of the Church held in October, 1840,  President Joseph Smith spoke of the necessity of building a “house of the Lord”  in Nauvoo. Reynolds Cahoon, Elias Higbee and Alpheus Cutler were appointed a  committee to build such a house. On motion it was also resolved that a  commencement be made ten days from that date (Oct. 3, 1840) “and that every  tenth day he appropriated for the building of the temple.” Early in January,  1841, the First Presidency issued a proclamation to the Saints scattered abroad,  in which they stated that “the temple of the Lord is in progress of erection  here, where the Saints will come to worship the God of their fathers, according  to the order of his house and the powers of the Holy Priesthood, and will be so  constructed as to enable all the functions of the Priesthood to be duly  exercised, and where instructions from the Most High will be received.”

 

The Revelation of January 19, 1841

 

A very important revelation was received January 19, 1841, dealing with various  subjects, but particularly with the building of the temple and the ordinances to  be performed therein. The Lord declared that the prayers of the Prophet were  acceptable to him, and he was called upon to make a solemn proclamation of the  Gospel to “all the kings of the world, to the four corners thereof; to the  honorable President-elect, and the high-minded governors of the nation . . . and  to all the nations of the earth.” It was to be written in the spirit of  meekness, yet of warning, for he was “about to call on them to give heed to the  light and glory of Zion, for the set time has come to favor her.” The Lord would  visit the mighty and the rulers of the earth in the day of his visitation.  Therefore, said he, “Awake, O kings of the earth! Come ye, O, come ye, with  your gold and your silver, to the help of my people, to the house of the  daughters of Zion.”

 

The Saints to Come from Afar

 

The Saints were also commanded to come from afar. Messengers were to be chosen  and sent unto them saying: “Come ye, with all your gold, and your silver, and  your precious stones, and with all your antiquities; and with all who have  knowledge of antiquities, that will come, may come, and bring the box tree, and  the fir tree, and the pine tree, together with all the precious trees of the  earth; and with iron, with copper, and with brass, and with zinc, and your  precious things of the earth, and build a house to my name for the Most High to  dwell therein.”

 

Fulness of the Priesthood

 

“For there is not a place,” said the Lord, “found on earth where he may come and  restore again that which was lost unto you, or which he hath taken away, even  the fulness of the Priesthood,” which fulness can only be obtained in the house  of the Lord.

 

The Kirtland Temple and its Mission

 

This declaration from the Lord would indicate that the purpose for which the  Kirtland Temple was erected was now fulfilled, and its mission completed; and  this was indeed the case. The Kirtland Temple served temporarily only. It was  built because a house was necessary where the Lord could come and restore the  various keys of former dispensations, that the Dispensation of the Fulness of  Times might be made complete. In the Kirtland Temple the Lord gave a partial  endowment, but not in the fulness, that the apostles and others might be endowed  with necessary power to go forth “to prune the vineyard for the last time.” But  the great object was the restoration of the keys of former dispensations. When  these were bestowed, then greater light was revealed, and the full purpose of  temples and ordinance work therein was made known. It then became necessary  that a house of the Lord should be built that would be perfect in all its parts,  which was not the case in the structure of the Kirtland Temple. That edifice,  although one of the most important ever erected by the Church, was not a  complete structure as temples are understood through increased revelation. In it  there were no provisions for the salvation of the dead; it had not a baptismal  font a fundamental part of the perfect temple and therefore, since it had filled  the measure of its creation, the Lord declared in the revelation of January,  1841, that there was not a house on the earth where he could come to bestow the  fulness of the Priesthood and introduce the essential ordinances for the  salvation of both the living and the dead. Moroni, John the Baptist, Peter,  James and John, all came before there was a temple; but their coming was  necessary that the foundation might be laid and the Church established. The Lord  has made provision that in the sacred grove, the forest, and on the mountain  top, such keys may be bestowed, when there is no temple erected to his name,  and in the poverty of the people. Otherwise such keys are to be received only in  the temple reared to his holy name.

 

Baptism for the Dead

 

The doctrine of baptism for the dead was first made known to the Saints in a  discourse by the Prophet at the funeral of Elder Seymour Brunson, August 10,  1840. This doctrine was not understood by him until after the restoration of the  keys and the Priesthood of Elijah in the Kirtland Temple, although it had been  referred to since the night of the first appearance of Moroni. In this  revelation of January, 1841, the Lord revealed greater light regarding this  wonderful principle. It was here made known that this ordinance was to be  performed in the temple of the Lord. A baptismal font for this purpose was to be  placed in the basement of the temple, “as a simile of the grave,” and was  commanded to be in a place underneath where the living are wont to assemble, to  show forth the living and the dead; and that all things may have their likeness,  and that they may accord one with another; that which is earthly conforming to  that which is heavenly” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 128:13).

 

In an epistle to the Twelve Apostles, who were at the time in Europe, President  Joseph Smith, October 19, 1840, made the following statement:

 

 “I presume the doctrine of ‘baptism for the dead’ has ere this reached your  ears, and may have raised some inquiries in your minds respecting the same. I  cannot in this letter give you all the information you may desire on the  subject; but aside from knowledge independent of the Bible, I would say that it  was certainly practiced by the ancient churches; and St. Paul endeavors to prove  the doctrine of the resurrection from the same, and says, ‘Else what shall they  do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? Why are they  then baptized for the dead?’

 

“I first mentioned the doctrine in public when preaching the funeral sermon of  Brother Seymour Brunson; and have since then given general instructions in the  Church on the subject. The Saints have the privilege of being baptized for those  of their relatives who are dead, whom they believe would have embraced the  Gospel, if they had been privileged with hearing it, and who have received the  Gospel in the spirit, through the instrumentality of those who have been  commissioned to preach to them while in prison.”

 

The Rite Performed in the River

 

After this doctrine was revealed the Lord granted the Saints the privilege of  performing the ordinance of baptism for the dead in the Mississippi River, until  such time as a font could be prepared in the basement of the temple. When a  temporary font was prepared, and long before the temple was completed, this  privilege of baptizing for the dead in any other place than the temple was  discontinued by commandment of the Lord. So important was this work in behalf of  the salvation of the worthy dead, that the Lord declared that the living could  not be made perfect without them, and, when the opportunity presented itself,  should the members of the Church fail to perform the ordinance for their dead,  the Lord said he would reject them, for the dead were to be saved by the same  principles which would save the living.

 

Things Hid from the Foundation of the World

 

Not only was the ordinance of baptism for the dead to be performed in the  temple, but the Lord promised to reveal many things “which have been kept hid  from before the foundation of the world, things that pertain to the Dispensation  of the Fulness of Times.” Here the keys of the Holy Priesthood were to be  received, for such were ordained to be obtained in temples that the Saints may  receive honor and glory, both the living and, by proxy, the dead, even those  blessings by which they should be crowned with honor, immortality and eternal  life.

 

The Nauvoo House

 

Another house was also to be built in Nauvoo. This was the Nauvoo House, a place  for the boarding of strangers. Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Hyrum Smith, and  many others were called upon to “pay stock” for themselves and their seed after  them “from generation to generation,” in this house. It was to be a place where  the “weary traveler may find health and safety while he shall contemplate the  word of the Lord; and the corner stone [stake] I have appointed for Zion,” said  the Lord. Those who took stock were not to pay less than fifty dollars, and not  more than fifteen thousand dollars for any one man.

 

The Calling of Hyrum Smith

 

Another important commandment in this revelation was the appointment of Hyrum  Smith, to act as patriarch in the office which had been held by his father, and  also his ordination to be a “prophet, seer and revelator” unto the Church, as  well as Joseph Smith. The Lord had pointed out several years before, when Joseph  Smith, Sen., was called to be the patriarch of the Church, that this office was  his by right of lineage, and descended from father to son, and was the right  based on faithfulness of the first born. At the time of Hyrum Smith’s call, he  was serving as second counselor in the First Presidency, a place he was called  to occupy after the transgression of Frederick G. Williams. The revelation  relating to this appointment reads as follows:

 

 “And again, verily I say unto you, let my servant William [Law] be appointed,  ordained, and anointed, as a counselor unto my servant Joseph [Smith] in the  room of my servant Hyrum, that my servant Hyrum may take the office of  Priesthood and Patriarch, which was appointed unto him by his father, by  blessing and also by right.

 

“That from henceforth he shall hold the keys of the patriarchal blessing upon  the heads of all my people;

 

“That whoever he blesses shall be blessed, and whoever he curses shall be  cursed; that whatsoever he shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and  whatsoever he shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

 

“And from this time forth I appoint unto him that he may be a prophet, and a  seer and a revelator unto my Church, as well as my servant Joseph.

 

“That he may act in concert also with my servant Joseph, and that he shall  receive counsel from my servant Joseph, who shall show unto him the keys whereby  he may ask and receive, and be crowned with the same blessing, and glory, and  honor, and Priesthood, and gifts of the Priesthood, that once were put upon him  that was my servant Oliver Cowdery;

 

“That my servant Hyrum may bear record of the things which I shall show unto  him, that his name may be had in honorable remembrance from generation to  generation, forever and ever.”

 

Oliver Cowdery’s Blessing Transferred to Hyrum Smith

 

Oliver Cowdery, as we have learned, stood with the Prophet Joseph Smith in  holding the keys of the kingdom. He was associated with Joseph Smith in all his  ordinations and in the bestowal of keys from the heavens from the beginning. It  was Oliver Cowdery, not Sidney Rigdon or Frederick G. Williams, who knelt with  the Prophet Joseph at the altar in the Kirtland Temple, April 3, 1836, when the  Savior, Moses, Elias, Elijah, and perhaps other ancient prophets, came and  conferred with them, bestowing keys, Priesthood and authority of former  dispensations that all things might be complete and perfect in the Dispensation  of the Fulness of Times. All these blessings Oliver Cowdery would have held  throughout eternity, if he had remained faithful and true to his calling; but he  fell away, and therefore the Lord bestowed these gifts, blessings, and powers of  presidency, upon the head of Hyrum Smith, the faithful brother of the Prophet  Joseph, of whom the Lord also said in this revelation: “And again, verily I say  unto you, blessed is my servant Hyrum Smith, for I, the Lord, love him because  of the integrity of his heart, and because he loveth that which is right before  me.”

 

Sunday, January 24, 1841, Hyrum Smith received the ordination to these holy  callings under the hands of President Joseph Smith. On the same occasion George  Miller was ordained a bishop in the place of Edward Partridge, deceased.

 

Laying Corner Stones of the Temple

 

April 6, 1841, which was the eleventh anniversary of the organization of the  Church, the corner stones of the Nauvoo Temple were laid. Early in the morning  fourteen companies of the Nauvoo Legion, and two military companies from across  the river in Iowa, assembled and were conducted to the grounds assigned for the  general review. During the forenoon, various military maneuvers were conducted.  It was an impressive scene. At twelve o’clock the procession arrived at the  temple grounds and the ceremonies of laying the corner stones were commenced.  President Sidney Rigdon addressed the assembly at some length after which the  architects, under the direction of the First Presidency, lowered the south-east  corner stone to its place, and the Prophet said:

 

 “This principal corner stone in representation of the First Presidency, is now  duly laid in honor of the Great God; and may it there remain until the whole  fabric is completed; and may the same be accomplished speedily; that the Saints  may have a place to worship God, and the Son of Man have where to lay his head.”

 

Adjournment was taken for one hour and after the people reassembled the three  other corner stones were laid in the following order: the south-west, the  north-west and the north-east, after which the services were closed.

 

Order of Temple Building

 

The Prophet later gave instructions pertaining to the order of the laying of  corner stones of temples as follows:

 

 “If the strict order of the Priesthood were carried out in the building of  Temples, the first stone would be laid at the south-east corner, by the First  Presidency of the Church. The south-west corner should be laid next; the third,  or north-west corner, next; and the fourth, or northeast corner, last. The First  Presidency should lay the southeast corner stone and dictate who are the proper  persons to lay the other corner stones.

 

“If a temple is built at a distance, and the First Presidency are not present,  then the quorum of the Twelve Apostles are the persons to dictate the order for  that temple; and in the absence of the Twelve Apostles, then the presidency of  the stake will lay the south-east corner stone; the Melchizedek Priesthood  laying the corner stones on the east side of the temple, and the Lesser  Priesthood those on the west side.”

 

Baptisms in the River Discontinued

 

At the conference of the Church held in Nauvoo, October 2nd to 5th, 1841, the  Prophet made this announcement: “There shall be no more baptisms for the dead,  until the ordinance can be attended to in the Lord’s House; and the Church shall  not hold another General Conference, until they can meet in said house. For thus  saith the Lord!” The reason for this announcement was that the temple had  progressed so far that the font in the basement had been prepared for this  ordinance, therefore, baptisms for the dead could no longer be performed in the  river.

 

Dedication of the Font in the Temple

 

One month later, November 8, 1841, the baptismal font in the temple was  dedicated. President Brigham Young was spokesman. The font is described as being  situated in the center of the basement room, under the main hall of the temple.  It was constructed of pine timber, and put together of staves tongued and  grooved, oval shaped, sixteen feet long east and west, and twelve feet wide,  seven feet high from the foundation, the basin four feet deep, the moulding of  the cap and base were formed of beautiful carved work. It stood upon twelve  oxen, four on each side, and two at each end, their heads, shoulders, and fore  legs projecting out from under the font. The oxen and ornamental mouldings were  carved by Elder Elijah Fordham, which took him eight months to finish. This font  was replaced later by a permanent font which was more durable.

 

First Baptisms in the Temple

 

Sunday, November 21, 1841, the twelve met in council at President Brigham  Young’s house, and at four o’clock they repaired to the baptismal font in the  temple, where President Brigham Young, Elders Heber C. Kimball and John Taylor  baptized about forty persons for their dead. Elders Willard Richards, Wilford  Woodruff and George A. Smith, confirmed them. These were the first baptisms for  the dead in the font in the Lord’s House. From this time forth, as long as the  Saints remained in Nauvoo, baptisms for the dead were performed in the temple.

 

Death of Don Carlos Smith

 

Sunday, August 7, 1841, Don Carlos Smith, the youngest brother of the Prophet,  died in Nauvoo. He was only twenty-six years of age, and was one of the first to  receive the testimony of the Prophet. He received the Priesthood when but  fourteen years of age, and in 1836 was made president of the high priests’  quorum. He was on a mission in Tennessee and Kentucky in 1838. During his  absence in the midst of winter his wife was driven from her home which was  burned, and she was forced to wade Grand River with her two little children. In  Kirtland he labored in the office of Oliver Cowdery and learned the art of  printing. In the flight of his father’s family from Missouri in the winter of  1839, he took charge, and saw them removed to Quincy, Illinois. In June, 1839,  he commenced making preparations for printing the Times and Seasons, a  periodical published in Nauvoo. The press and type had been rescued by Elias  Smith, Hyrum Clark and others, from Dawson’s yard in Far West, where it had been  buried the night that place was besieged by the mob-militia under General Lucas.  The Times and Seasons was issued by Don Carlos Smith and Ebenezer Robinson, the  first number appearing in November, 1839. At the time of his death the editors  were Don Carlos Smith and Robert B. Thompson. Don Carlos was six feet four  inches tall, was very straight, strong and active. The Prophet said of him: “I  never knew any fault in him; I never saw the first immoral act, or the first  irreligious or ignoble disposition in the child from the time he was born until  the time of his death. He was a lovely, a good-natured, a kind-hearted, and a  virtuous and faithful, upright child; and where his soul goes, let mine go  also.”

 

Death of Robert B. Thompson

 

Three weeks later, Robert Brashel Thompson, general Church recorder, died at his  residence in Nauvoo, in the thirtieth year of his age. As already stated, he was  associate editor of the Times and Seasons, and had been engaged in writing for  the Prophet and for the Church, and was a colonel in the Nauvoo Legion. In 1837,  he married Mercy Rachel Fielding, sister of Mary Fielding Smith, wife of the  Patriarch Hyrum Smith. He and his associate Don Carlos Smith, both fell victims  to the unhealthful conditions which prevailed in Nauvoo at the time of its  settlement.

 

Dedication of Palestine

 

Early Sunday morning, October 24, 1841, Elder Orson Hyde, of the council of the  twelve, ascended the Mount of Olives and dedicated by prayer the land of  Palestine for the gathering of the Jews. He was appointed to this mission at the  April conference in 1840. Elder John E. Page was also appointed to go with him,  but lost the spirit of his mission before he reached the eastern border of the  United States, and failed to cross the water, leaving Elder Hyde to make the  journey alone. After passing through many difficulties and privations Elder Hyde  arrived in Jerusalem in October, 1841. He prayed “for the gathering together of  Judah’s scattered remnants,” according to the predictions of the holy prophets;  for the building of Jerusalem again after it has been trodden down by the  Gentiles so long; and for rearing a temple to the name of the Lord. “Grant,  therefore,” he prayed, “O Lord, in the name of thy well-beloved Son, Jesus  Christ, to remove the barrenness and sterility of this land, and let springs of  living water break forth to water its thirsty soil. Let the vine and olive  produce in their strength, and the fig tree bloom and flourish. Let the land  become abundantly fruitful and possessed by its rightful heirs; let it again  flow with plenty to feed the returning prodigals who come home with a spirit of  grace and supplication. Upon it let the clouds distill virtue and richness, and  let the fields smile with plenty. Let the flocks and the herds greatly increase  and multiply upon the mountains and the hills; and let thy great kindness  conquer and subdue the unbelief of thy people. Do thou take from them their  stony heart, and give them a heart of flesh; and may the sun of thy favor dispel  the cold mists of darkness which have beclouded their atmosphere. Incline them  to gather in upon this land according to thy word. Let them come like clouds and  like doves to their windows. Let the large ships of the nations bring them from  the distant isles; and let kings become their nursing fathers, and queens with  motherly fondness wipe the tear of sorrow from their eye.”

 

In this manner Elder Hyde prayed upon the Mount of Olives, dedicating the land  for the return of the remnant of Judah from the four corners of the earth. He  also erected a pile of stones as a witness according to the ancient custom, on  the top of the Mount of Olives, and another on the top of Mount Moriah, where  the ancient temple stood.

 

Orson Hyde of the House of Judah

 

Elder Orson Hyde was of the house of Judah. It was therefore very proper that  he, as one of the apostles of the Lord in this last dispensation, should be sent  to bless the land for the gathering of the Jews. At one time, nearly ten years  before, the following blessing was pronounced upon him: “In due time thou shalt  go to Jerusalem, the land of thy fathers, and be a watchman unto the house of  Israel; and by thy hand shall the Most High do a work, which shall prepare the  way and greatly facilitate the gathering of that people.”1

 

The Book of Abraham

 

During the month of March the Prophet prepared for publication his translation  of the Book of Abraham, which he commenced to translate while residing at  Kirtland. Due to the persecutions and drivings of the Saints this matter could  not be attended to before this time, but the manuscript had been carefully  preserved, and was now published for the benefit of the Church and all the  world. This work together with the Book of Moses, has since been received among  the standard works of the Church.

 

The Wentworth Letter

 

At the request of Mr. John Wentworth, editor of the Chicago Democrat, the  Prophet prepared an article for publication giving a brief history of the  Church. This history was published in the Times and Seasons, March 1, 1842. Mr.  Wentworth stated that he wished to furnish the information to a Mr. Bastow who  was writing a history of New Hampshire. This article is one of the earliest  documents giving a consecutive account of the history of the Church. It is  concise and comprehensive, yet covers only a few pages. The most important  feature in this paper is the publication therein, for the first time, of the  Articles of Faith. These articles, thirteen in number, were given by  inspiration, and form a simple, comprehensive declaration of many doctrines of  the Church, which have since been accepted by the vote of the Church as a  standard epitome of belief. They are as follows:

 

 “We believe in God the Eternal Father, and in His Son Jesus Christ, and in the  Holy Ghost.

 

“We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam’s  transgression.

 

“We believe that through the atonement of Christ all mankind may be saved by  obedience to the laws and ordinances of the gospel.

 

“We believe that these ordinances are 1st: Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; 2nd:  Repentance; 3rd: Baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; 4th: Laying on  of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost.

 

“We believe that a man must be called of God by ‘prophecy and by the laying on  of hands’ by those who are in authority, to preach the gospel and administer in  the ordinances thereof.

 

“We believe in the same organization that existed in the primitive church,  namely, Apostles, Prophets, Pastors, Teachers, Evangelists, etc.

 

“We believe in the gift of tongues, prophecy, revelations, visions, healing,  interpretations of tongues, etc.

 

“We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated  correctly; we also believe the Book of Mormon to be the word of God.

 

“We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we  believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to  the kingdom of God.

 

“We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten  Tribes; that Zion will be built upon this continent; that Christ will reign  personally upon the earth, and that the earth will be renewed and receive its  paradisiacal glory.

 

“We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of  our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how,  where or what they may.

 

“We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers and magistrates, in  obeying, honoring and sustaining the law.

 

“We believe in being honest, true, chaste, benevolent, virtuous, and in doing  good to all men; indeed we may say that we follow the admonition of Paul, ‘We  believe all things, we hope all things,’ we have endured many things, and hope  to be able to endure all things. If there is anything virtuous, lovely or of  good report, or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.”

 

Organization of the Relief Society

 

March 17, 1842, “The Female Relief Society of Nauvoo” was organized by the  Prophet Joseph Smith. Emma Smith was chosen president with Elizabeth Ann Whitney  and Sarah M. Cleveland, as counselors. The purpose of the society is to furnish  the sisters of the Church an organization through which they could actively  foster the welfare of the members. The duty of the society was stated to be to  aid the poor, nurse the sick and afflicted, and in a general way, under the  direction and guidance of the bishop, to engage in true charitable work in  behalf of all whose necessities require assistance. This was the first  organization of women in the world, so far as history records. It is in keeping  with the genius of the Gospel, for the Lord provides duties and labors for all  the members of the Church, both men and women, wherein service may be rendered  for the temporal as well as the spiritual salvation of mankind.

 

Inauguration of Endowments

 

In the revelation of January 19, 1841, the Lord promised to reveal to Joseph  Smith all things pertaining to the temple and the Priesthood thereof, which  revelation and knowledge were necessary before the temple was erected.  Wednesday, May 4, 1842, the Prophet met with his brother, Patriarch Hyrum Smith,  President Brigham Young, Elders Heber C. Kimball, Willard Richards, James Adams  of Springfield, Bishops Newel K. Whitney and George Miller, and instructed them  in the principles and orders of the Priesthood that belong to the temple of the  Lord. He made known to them the doctrines of washings and anointings and  communications spoken of in the revelation. In this council, which was held in  the upper room over his store, Joseph Smith also instructed these brethren in  “all those plans and principles by which any one is enabled to secure the  fulness of those blessings which have been prepared for the Church of the First  Born.” These same blessings, the Prophet stated, would in due time be given in  the temple to all the Saints who were worthy to receive them. This was the  introduction of the temple ceremonies in their fulness in this dispensation, as  they apply to the living and to the dead. From time to time after this, these  instructions (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 5:1 through 2) were repeated and  the other members of the council of the twelve and their wives, and a few  others, received their endowments under the direction of the Prophet Joseph  Smith, as he was commanded to make these things known. The members of the Church  at large, however, were required to wait until such time as these ordinances  could be performed in the temple, the place designated by the Lord for such  instructions and ordinance work to be given.

 

Notes

 

 1. The evidence of the divine power accompanying the dedication of the land of  Palestine is seen in the wonderful changes which have come over that land in  recent years, and also in the changed attitude of the Jews, in relation to their  return and also their belief in Jesus Christ. Nephi prophesied as follows  regarding the restoration of the Jews: “And it shall come to pass that the Jews  which are scattered also shall begin to believe in Christ; and they shall begin  to gather in upon the face of the land; and as many as shall believe in Christ  shall also become a delightsome people” (2 Nephi 30:7). The Savior also referred  to this in his instruction to the Nephites: “And I will remember the covenant  which I have made with my people; and I have covenanted with them that I would  gather them together in mine own due time, that I would give unto them again the  land of their fathers for their inheritance, which is the land of Jerusalem,  which is the promised land unto them forever, saith the Father. And it shall  come to pass that the time cometh, when the fulness of my gospel shall be  preached unto them: and they shall believe in me, that I am Jesus Christ, the  Son of God, and shall pray unto the Father in my name.” (3 Nephi 20:29 through 30).

 

At the time of the dedication of Palestine the feeling expressed by the Jews  towards Jesus Christ was most bitter. This condition is stated by Dr. Isadore  Singer, as follows: “When I was a boy, had my father who was a very pious man,  heard the name of Jesus uttered from the pulpit of our synagogue, he and every  other man in the congregation would have left the building and the rabbi would  have been dismissed at once.

 

“Now it is not strange in many synagogues to hear sermons preached eulogistic of  this Jesus, and nobody thinks of protesting  in fact, we are all glad to claim  Jesus as one of our people.” Compare the letter of Rabbi Landau, Documentary  History of the Church, vol. 3:356.

 

In 1891, Baron Maurice de Hirch founded the Jewish Colonization Association. The  “Lovers of Zion” Association was commenced about 1878, and was supported by  Baron Edmund de Rothschild. The Zionist Federation was organized in 1896, and  was strongly promulgated by Theodore Herzl of Vienna, Baron de Rothschild and  many other renowned Jews. All of these organizations were formed to aid in the  colonization of the Jews in Palestine. The first congress of the Zionist  Federation was held in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897, where the old nationalistic  sentiment was revived, and organizations were established for the gathering of  the Jews.

 

At the Zionist Congress held in London in 1901, Professor R. Gothell, president  of the federation, said: “It is time the nations understood our motives. Our  purpose is gradually to colonize Palestine. We political Zionists desire a  charter from the Sultan authorizing us to settle in our Holy Land, and we ask  the powers to approve and protect this charter.”

 

A few years ago the firm of Funk and Wagnalls published an edition of Dr. George  Croley’s work: “Tarry Thou Till I Come,” and in the introduction Dr. Funk said:  “It has been believed by many from the earliest ages of the Christian era that  among the signs of Christ’s coming would be the recognition of him by the Jews  as one sent of the Father; and that they would then be restored to the Father’s  favor.” Dr. Funk also collected a number of expressions from leading Jews, their  belief in regard to the Savior, which were published in Dr. Croley’s work. Some  of them are as follows:

 

Rabbi Henry Berkowits: “This Jew, Jesus, is the greatest, noblest rabbi of them  all.”

 

Morris Jastrow: “From the historic point of view, Jesus is to be regarded as a  direct successor of the Hebrew prophets. His teachings are synonymous with the  highest spiritual aspirations of the human race.”

 

Jacob H. Schiff: “We Jews honor and revere Jesus of Nazareth as we do our own  prophets who preceded him.”

 

The Savior said to his disciples in relation to the destruction of Jerusalem:  “And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive  into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the  times of the Gentiles be fulfilled” (Luke 21:24). The indication that this time  of restitution is at hand is seen in the results coming out of the capture of  Palestine by General Allenby in December, 1917, during the Great War. Since that  time the Holy Land has been under the control of the British nation, and Dr.  Herbert Samuel, an orthodox Jew, has been sent there as governor of the land.  This is the first time since before the fall of Jerusalem (70 A.D.), which was  predicted by the Savior, that a ruler from the house of Judah has presided in  that land. It is an event of great significance.

 

 Chapter 31 Joseph Smith Accused as Accessory to Assault on Boggs 1842

 

Perfidy of John C. Bennett

 

Doctor John C. Bennett came to Nauvoo in August, 1841, and joined the Church.  Through his zealous activity in assisting to procure the Nauvoo Charter, he was  honored by the citizens in the first election, by being chosen mayor of Nauvoo.  He also rose to prominence in the councils of the Church, and appeared to be a  firm believer in the Gospel, and a staunch friend to President Joseph Smith. Not  many months later, however, through immoral conduct, he lost the spirit of the  Gospel, and likewise his love for President Joseph Smith. His case is an  illustration of the truth, that the Spirit of the Lord will not dwell in an  unholy tabernacle. When men transgress the Holy Spirit withdraws, and the light  in them turns to darkness. The first intimation that all was not well with Dr.  Bennett was made manifest to the Prophet May 7, 1842, after a drill and sham  battle by the Nauvoo Legion. This event had been under preparation since the  previous January, and it was the intention of all to make it a grand success. In  the forenoon of that day there was a parade of the legion, some twenty-six  companies, comprising about two thousand troops. Judge Stephen A. Douglas, who  was holding court at Carthage, adjourned, and with some leading attorneys, went  to Nauvoo to witness the military maneuvers of the legion. While there he was  the guest of President Joseph Smith. The day passed harmoniously without  confusion. A large company of spectators and distinguished strangers had  assembled to witness the sham battle.

 

Dr. Bennett who was major general of the legion requested President Smith as  lieutenant general to take command of the first cohort during the sham battle.  But this the Prophet declined to do. Bennett next requested him to take his  station in the rear of the cavalry without his staff, while the engagement was  going on; but Captain Albert P. Rockwood of the Prophet’s body guard would not  consent, and kept close by his leader’s side, who chose his own position. The  Spirit of the Lord whispered to Joseph Smith that all was not well, and after  the day’s celebration was over he said, “If General Bennett’s true feelings  toward me are not made manifest to the world in a very short time, then it may  be possible that the gentle breathings of that Spirit which whispered to me on  parade, that there was mischief concealed in that sham battle, were false; a  short time will determine the point. Let John C. Bennett answer at the day of  judgment: Why did you request me to command one of the cohorts, and also to take  my position without my staff, during the sham battle, on the 7th of May, 1842,  where my life might have been the forfeit, and no man have known who did the  deed?”

 

Bennett’s Resignation

 

Ten days later, Dr. Bennett resigned his office as mayor of Nauvoo having been  accused of immorality. The same day he went before Alderman Daniel H. Wells, who  was not a member of the Church, and made affidavit to the effect that he had  never been taught anything in the least contrary to the principles of the  Gospel, and the strictest morality in both word and deed, by Joseph Smith. On  the 19th, the city council met and elected Joseph Smith to fill Bennett’s  unexpired term as mayor of Nauvoo. Before the council on this occasion, Bennett  was accused with having said Joseph Smith taught him to practice immorality. He  replied, that “those who made such a statement were infernal liars,” for Joseph  Smith had always taught him to be virtuous. He then pled to be forgiven of his  wrong doing, and said he hoped yet to prove by repentance his worthiness to  fellowship in the Church. For the sake of his mother, he prayed that his evil  practices might not be exposed. In this apparently repentant spirit he appeared  before nearly one hundred brethren and cried like a child, stating, “that he was  worthy of the severest chastisement.” The brethren thought him sincere and the  Prophet in mercy pled in his behalf. In a very short time, it was discovered  that not only had Bennett been guilty of immoral practices, but he had taught  others to be like himself, placing the responsibility for such teachings on the  shoulders of the Prophet. The result was that others had to be handled for their  fellowship. For this cause, and a defiant spirit, Chauncey L. Higbee, was  excommunicated. Others, on confession of their wrong doing, and repentance,  were forgiven.

 

J. C. Bennett Leaves Nauvoo

 

Notwithstanding the mercy extended to Bennett by the brethren some time during  the month of June, he left Nauvoo, breathing out threatenings against the  Prophet and the Church. He made the statement “that he had withdrawn from the  fellowship of the Saints because they were not worthy of his society.” He then  entered into correspondence with the enemies of Joseph Smith in Missouri,  endeavoring to stir them up to continue their persecutions against him. This  made it necessary that a public statement be made in regard to the immoral  practices of Dr. Bennett. This document which was signed by the Prophet  contained a supporting affidavit, bearing the signatures of the aldermen and  councilors of the city of Nauvoo. Bennett later published a book, The History  of the Saints, which represented to be an exposé of “Mormonism.” The work was so  filled with corrupt expressions, such as would naturally come from so vile a  source, that it only created a spirit of disgust in those who read it, and it  proved to be a failure.

 

Shooting of Ex-Governor Boggs

 

On the 6th day of May, 1842, ex-Governor Lilburn W. Boggs was shot while sitting  alone in a room of his residence in Independence. He was badly wounded and for  several days his life was in the balance, but he soon recovered.

 

President Smith Accused as an Accessory

 

July 20, 1842, Boggs went before Samuel Weston, justice of the peace in  Independence, and made affidavit that Orrin Porter Rockwell, a resident of  Illinois, had done the shooting. He applied to Governor Carlin in his affidavit,  for the surrender of Rockwell “according to law.” Subsequently he made another  affidavit in which he said he had “good reason to believe, from evidence and  information now in his possession, that Joseph Smith, commonly called ‘the  “Mormon” Prophet,’ was accessory before the fact of the intended murder, and  that the said Joseph Smith is a citizen or resident of the state of Illinois.”  He applied to Governor Thomas Reynolds of Missouri, for a demand on Governor  Carlin of Illinois, to deliver up Joseph Smith, to be dealt with according to  law. Governor Reynolds very willingly granted the request, and appointed Edward  R. Ford agent to receive the Prophet. In the requisition, Governor Reynolds  stated “Joseph Smith is a fugitive from justice, charged with being accessory  before the fact, to an assault with the intent to kill, made by one O. P.  Rockwell, on Lilburn W. Boggs, in this state (Missouri) and is represented to  the executive department of this state as having fled to the state of Illinois.”  He therefore demanded the surrender of the Prophet on these grounds. Boggs had  not accused Joseph Smith of being a fugitive, or with fleeing from Missouri;  this charge was added by Reynolds. No doubt his reason was that he knew Missouri  could have no claim upon Joseph Smith without making it appear that he had  committed the alleged crime within Missouri and fled from her borders.

 

The foundation for this accusation was perhaps based on the rumor circulated at  the time, and printed in the Quincy Whig, that Joseph Smith had prophesied that  Boggs would die a violent death. As soon as the Prophet heard of this rumor he  took occasion to deny it publicly saying that he had made no such statement.  Nevertheless, it gave occasion for an accusation, and it appears evident that  Boggs and his fellow conspirators thought it an opportunity, and an excuse, to  get the Prophet within their clutches, where they might kill him “according to  law.”

 

Governor Carlin’s Action

 

Governor Carlin of Illinois, appeared to be a party to this conspiracy. He had,  at least, become embittered against President Joseph Smith, and was very willing  to accede to the demand from Missouri. He was thoroughly acquainted with the law  and knew perfectly well that the Prophet was in Nauvoo on the 6th day of May,  1842, consequently was not subject to the requisition of Governor Reynolds of  Missouri. He knew that President Smith was not a fugitive from justice; and,  even if the false and malicious charge had been true, he knew the Prophet was  entitled to a fair and legal trial in Illinois, not Missouri. Yet he would yield  to this unlawful and unrighteous demand against his knowledge of these facts.

 

The Rocky Mountain Prophecy

 

On Saturday, August 6, 1842, President Joseph Smith passed over the river to  Montrose, in company with General James Adams, Colonel Brewer, Hyrum Smith and a  number of others, and witnessed the installation of the officers of the Rising  Sun Lodge of Masons, by General Adams, deputy grand master of Illinois. While  General Adams was giving instructions to the master-elect, Joseph Smith had a  conversation with a number of the brethren who were resting in the shade of the  building. His topic was the persecutions of the Saints in Missouri, and the  constant annoyance which had followed them since coming to Illinois and Iowa. In  the course of his conversation the Prophet uttered a prophecy which he recorded  in his journal as follows:

 

 “I prophesied that the Saints would continue to suffer much affliction and would  be driven to the Rocky Mountains, many would apostatize, others would be put to  death by our persecutors, or lose their lives in consequence of exposure or  disease, and some of them would live to go and assist in making settlements and  build cities and see the Saints become a mighty people in the midst of the Rocky  Mountains.”

 

Arrest of President Smith

 

The governor of Illinois honored the demand of the Missourians, and on the 8th  day of August, 1842, President Joseph Smith and Orrin P. Rockwell were both  taken into custody by the deputy sheriff of Adams County, on a warrant issued by  the governor. The prisoners demanded the right of habeas corpus, and the court  of Nauvoo issued a writ demanding that the bodies of the two accused men be  brought before that court. The deputy sheriff and his aids refused to recognize  the jurisdiction of the court, and returned to Governor Carlin for further  instructions, leaving the Prophet and Rockwell in the hands of the marshal of  Nauvoo. The marshal had no papers by which they could be held, so permitted them  to go about their business.

 

The Prophet’s Comments on His Arrest

 

Commenting on his arrest, the Prophet said:

 

 “I have yet to learn by what rule of right I was arrested to be transported to  Missouri for a trial of the kind stated. ‘An accessory to an assault with intent  to kill,’ does not come under the provision of the fugitive act, when the person charged has not been out of Illinois. An accessory before the fact to manslaughter is something of an anomaly. The isolated affidavit of ex-Governor Boggs is no more than any other man’s, and the constitution says, that no person  shall be liable to be transported out of the state for an offense committed within the same. The whole is another Missouri farce.”

 

Expecting the return of the deputy sheriff, President Smith secured a writ of  habeas corpus from the master in chancery for the district of Illinois, fearing  that the court of Nauvoo might be deemed without jurisdiction or authority. Two  days later when the officers returned, President Smith and Rockwell were not at  home. The deputy sheriff made many threats and tried to intimidate the brethren  at Nauvoo, but failing in this, when questioned, he admitted that the course the  governor had taken was unjustifiable and illegal.

 

President Joseph Smith in Retirement

 

Because of the excitement which prevailed and the fear that they would be  unlawfully dragged to Missouri, Joseph and O. P. Rockwell retired to seclusion.  While in retirement the Prophet kept in touch with affairs in Nauvoo and wrote  to the Saints from time to time. It was while thus confined that he wrote the  important letters which now appear as sections 127 and 128 in the Doctrine and  Covenants, on baptism for the dead.

 

Threats of Mob Vengeance

 

When the officers failed to find President Smith and Orrin Porter Rockwell, they  were enraged and threatened to return with a sufficient force to search every  house in Nauvoo. Ford, the officer from Missouri, declared that he would come  with a mob from Missouri and take the Prophet by force. Hearing of these  reports, President Smith wrote to Wilson Law, major general of the Nauvoo  Legion, advising him to take necessary steps to protect the citizens of Nauvoo  against any such attack. In his communication he said he had come to the  conclusion that he would never suffer himself to fall into the hands of the  Missourians alive, if he could help it. To surrender to the officers of Illinois  meant the same thing, for Governor Carlin had joined hands with Missouri, taking  unlawful steps to send him to that state. “I am determined, therefore,” the  Prophet said, “to keep out of their hands, and thwart their designs, if  possible.”

 

Emma Smith Appeals to Governor Carlin

 

August 17, 1842, Emma Smith wrote a pathetic appeal to Governor Carlin pleading  the cause of her husband and the Latter-day Saints, and requesting that he  rescind his order to turn President Smith over to his enemies in Missouri. She  set forth in a clear, logical manner the fact that the decision to deliver him  to the authorities in Missouri was contrary to law. That if he had been guilty  of any crime it must have been committed in Illinois, and the pursuit of  President Smith was a continuation of the old mob spirit and persecution which  had followed the Saints during all the years of their sojourn in Missouri.  Others also appealed to the governor, reminding him of the many threats that  were made against the citizens of Nauvoo, by John C. Bennett, Edward R. Ford and  others. His reply to all of these was that he could not conceive of an attack  of violence upon the citizens, and there was “no excitement anywhere but in  Nauvoo, amongst the Mormons themselves.” There was no apprehension of trouble in  other places, so far as he was able to ascertain. At the same time he confessed  in conversation, that “persons were offering their services every day, either in  person or by letter, and held themselves in readiness to go against the Mormons”  whenever he should call upon them. Judge Ralston, who was present when the  governor read Emma Smith’s letter, asked him how he thought Mr. Smith could go  through the midst of his enemies, without violence being used towards him; and,  if acquitted, how was he to get back? The governor was unable to make  satisfactory reply.

 

Answering Emma Smith’s letter, the governor said he had been “prompted by a  strict sense of duty,” and in discharge of that duty, had “studiously pursued  that course least likely to produce excitement and alarm.” He hoped that Joseph  Smith would submit to the laws and that justice might be done. At the same time  he said the Constitution and the laws of the United States required him to take  the course he did regarding Joseph Smith as a fugitive from justice. Yet he was  perfectly aware that President Smith was not a fugitive in any sense of the  term. He further suggested that if “he is innocent of any crime, and the  proceedings are illegal, it would be the more easy for him to procure an  acquittal,” and he felt that Missouri would grant the “utmost latitude” in his  defense. It was clear that he had no friendly disposition towards the President  of the Church.

 

A Ruse to Capture President Smith

 

In the meantime President Joseph Smith returned to Nauvoo and in a meeting of a  special conference August 29, addressed the Saints. Some of the Saints thought  he had gone to Washington, others that he had gone to Europe, however, he had  been in Nauvoo most of the time. Sunday, October 2, 1842, word came from Quincy,  that Governor Carlin had offered a reward of two hundred dollars for the capture  of Joseph Smith and the same amount for O. P. Rockwell. The Quincy Whig also  stated that Governor Reynolds of Missouri, had offered a reward of three hundred  dollars for each of the brethren. President Sidney Rigdon, who had been in  conversation at Carthage with Judge Stephen A. Douglas, concerning Governor  Carlin’s proceedings, informed William Clayton that he had learned that the  governor had purposely issued an illegal writ, expecting President Joseph Smith  would be drawn by it to Carthage to be acquitted before Judge Douglas on habeas  corpus proceedings. As soon as this was done a legal writ would be served and  he would be carried away to Missouri. Elder Elias Higbee confirmed President  Rigdon’s report, adding thereto that many Missourians were coming to unite with  the militia of Illinois, voluntarily, at their own expense. If President Smith  should fail to go to Carthage they would come in force to Nauvoo and search the  city. Receiving this knowledge, the Prophet concluded again to leave home for a  season, and thus defeat the plans of Governor Carlin and his aids.

 

Justin Butterfield’s Legal Opinion

 

While all these trials and tribulations were going on, the case of President  Joseph Smith had been presented to United States District Attorney Justin  Butterfield, of Chicago, by the master in chancery, Major Warren. Mr.  Butterfield wrote to Sidney Rigdon, October 10, 1842, an elaborate opinion on  the case. The salient points in his opinion are as follows: If it could be  proved that Joseph Smith had not fled from Missouri since the commission of the  crime of which he was accused, and that he was not in that state at that time,  then the governor of Illinois had no power to surrender him to Missouri.  According to the Constitution, a man to be a fugitive, “must be a person who  shall flee from justice and be found in another state.” The defendant has the  right to show that the process upon which he was arrested was obtained by false  pretense, that it is untrue that he fled from Missouri to evade being brought to  justice there, for the crime of which he is charged. The affidavit of Boggs is  not conclusive and may be rebutted; the defendant has the right to show the  affidavit false. The affidavit of Boggs “on its face was not sufficient to  authorize the arrest of Smith.” The opinion concluded with the following advice:

 

 “I would advise that Mr. Smith procure respectable and sufficient affidavits to  prove beyond all question, that he was in the state (Illinois) and not in  Missouri, at the time the crime with which he is charged was committed, and upon  these affidavits, apply to the governor to countermand the warrant he has issued  for his arrest.

 

“If he should refuse to do so, I am clearly of the opinion that, upon the above  state of facts, the supreme court will discharge him upon habeas corpus.”

 

Governor Carlin’s attitude being unfavorable, no further action was taken until  December, when the term of Carlin expired. On the 8th of that month Thomas Ford  was inaugurated as the chief executive of Illinois. Immediately affidavits were  obtained to prove beyond controversy that President Joseph Smith was in the  state of Illinois on the 6th day of May, 1842, the day of the shooting of  ex-Governor Boggs, but Governor Ford refused to interfere with the action of his  predecessor. The supreme court being in session, he passed the case with all the  papers up to them for a decision. The judges held that the writ was illegal, but  were divided as to whether or not Ford should interfere. The governor thereupon  addressed President Joseph Smith, December 17, 1842, stating that he had  submitted the case to the supreme court of Illinois. The governor then said:

 

 “I can only advise that you submit to the laws and have a judicial investigation  of your rights. If it should become necessary, for this purpose, to repair to  Springfield, I do not believe that there will be a disposition to use illegal  violence towards you; and I would feel it my duty in your case, as in the case  of any other person, to protect you with any necessary amount of force from mob  violence whilst asserting your rights before the courts, going to and  returning.”

 

The Prophet Receives Advice

 

Justin Butterfield, in a letter from Springfield of the same date, advised the  Prophet to accept the suggestion of Governor Ford. He said the judges of the  supreme court were unanimous in the opinion that he would be entitled to a  discharge under a habeas corpus writ. Therefore he advised President Smith to go  to Springfield without delay, for he had the right to bring the case before the  United States court, which was then in session. “I will stand by you,” he said,  “and see you safely delivered from your arrest.”

 

Another letter was received from Judge James Adams, who greatly loved the  Prophet. He said:

 

 “My Son: It is useless for me to detail facts that the bearer can tell. But I  will say that it appears to my judgment that you had best make no delay in  coming before the court at this place for a discharge under a habeas corpus.”

 

Joseph Smith Surrenders for Trial

 

Acting on this advice, President Smith prepared to go to Springfield. December  26, he was arrested by General Wilson Law on the proclamation of Governor  Carlin. The next day in the custody of Wilson Law and a number of his closest  friends, he commenced his journey. On the way they obtained a writ of habeas  corpus from the master in chancery at Carthage. On the 30th, he arrived at the  home of Judge James Adams, in Springfield. The next day, to save delay, and  possible legal complications, Governor Ford was petitioned for another writ that  the case might be tried thereon and it was issued. At half-past eleven President  Smith went before Judge Pope, where Mr. Butterfield presented all the papers in  the case and asked for habeas corpus, because the accusation was false, which  was granted. The Prophet was then placed under bail in the sum of four thousand  dollars. Judge Adams and Wilson Law went bail for him, and his case was set for  Monday morning, January 2, 1843.

 

The Trial

 

A postponement of the trial was taken until the following Wednesday. When the  case came before the court, the attorney general, Josiah Lamborn, moved to  dismiss the proceedings, objecting to the jurisdiction of the court. He was  overruled and the trial proceeded. On the 5th day of January, 1843, Judge Pope  rendered a lengthy decision, 1  discharging the Prophet on the grounds that he  was entitled to his discharge for defect in the affidavit on which the demand  for his surrender to Missouri was made. “To authorize the arrest in this case,”  the opinion said, “the affidavit should have stated distinctly 1st, that Smith  had committed a crime; 2nd, that he committed it in Missouri. It must appear  that he fled from Missouri to authorize the governor of Missouri to demand him,  as none other than the governor of the state from which he fled can make the  demand. He could not have fled from justice unless he committed a crime, which  does not appear. It must appear that the crime was committed in Missouri, to  warrant the governor of Illinois in ordering him to be sent to Missouri for  trial.”

 

On these grounds an order was entered discharging the prisoner from arrest. Once  again Missouri, persecutor of saints and prophets, was defeated; but her thirst  for their blood was not satisfied.

 

Bennett’s Letter to Sidney Rigdon and Orson Pratt

 

January 10, 1843, John C. Bennett sent a communication from Springfield to  Sidney Rigdon, and addressed to Rigdon and Orson Pratt, in which he states that  he was leaving for Missouri to confer with the messenger charged with the arrest  of Joseph Smith, Hyrum Smith, Lyman Wight, and others, who would be demanded in  a few days on the old charge of “murder, burglary, treason, etc.” This was on  the new indictments found by the grand jury and based on the original evidence.  He said: “We shall try Smith on the Boggs case, when we get him into Missouri.  The war goes bravely on; and although Smith thinks he is now safe, the enemy is  near, even at the door.” Moreover, he stated that they had the assurance that  the governor of Illinois would acknowledge the new demand. “There is but one  opinion on the case,” he wrote, “and that is, nothing can save Joe on a new  requisition and demand predicated on the old charges on the institution of new  writs. He must go to Missouri; but he shall not be harmed if he is not guilty;  but he is a murderer, and must suffer the penalty of the law.” A postscript  requested that Sidney Rigdon hand the letter to Orson Pratt. After reading it,  Sidney Rigdon did as he was requested, but Orson Pratt immediately took the  letter to President Joseph Smith and informed him that he was not in league with  such a character as Bennett. Bennett wrote to these men knowing that at the time  they were both lukewarm towards the work, and that Orson Pratt, for  disobedience, had been handled for his fellowship. Following this episode, Orson  Pratt was received back in the fellowship of the Church. For some time previous  to this incident, Sidney Rigdon had failed to magnify his calling and had gone  contrary to counsel. When confronted with the letter from Bennett he denied  having had any correspondence with him.

 

Rejoicing in Nauvoo

 

When President Smith returned to Nauvoo, from his trial, there was great  rejoicing. Tuesday, January 17, 1843, was set apart by the apostles as a “day of  humiliation, fasting, praise, prayer and thanksgiving” before the Lord. Many  public meetings were held throughout the city. One public gathering of this kind  was held at the home of President Joseph Smith. The following day a party of  invited guests assembled at his home to celebrate his deliverance from his  enemies. The day passed very pleasantly; many interesting anecdotes were  related, and what added interest to the occasion was the fact that it was the  fifteenth anniversary of the Prophet’s wedding day.

 

Notes

 

1.  For the full decision, which should be read see  Documentary History of the  Church, vol. 5:223 through 231. See also pages 233 through 244 for papers on the trial.

 

 Chapter 32 Doctrinal Development and Prophecy. 1843

 

A Brief Period of Peace

 

At the beginning of the year 1843, peace reigned in Nauvoo; for a time the  Saints remained undisturbed, and the Prophet had a breathing spell of freedom.  Yet there were ripples on the surface of the water. President Joseph Smith had  been delivered from his enemies in Missouri. The persecutors of the Church had  been defeated; but were still determined to pursue their evil course. The  Missourians were in league with the enemies of the Prophet in Illinois, with a  relentless determination to bring him to his death.

 

This brief period of peace gave the Prophet an opportunity to instruct the  Saints in various duties and doctrines and more fully to establish the order and  authority of the Priesthood. The building of the temple progressed; increased  light was thrown on the subject of salvation for the dead, and the Saints were  impressed with the wonderful importance and responsibility connected with their  obligations in relation to their fathers. Important revelations were received.  The number of inhabitants in Nauvoo rapidly increased, and there was a time of  prosperity and general rejoicing. But such a condition was not destined to  continue very long. The clouds of malicious hatred were to be seen in the  distance, and soon the storm of bitter persecution was to break forth once  again in redoubled fury. Traitors within, and enemies without, were to join  hands for the destruction of the Prophet.

 

President Joseph Smith’s Intimation of Death

 

President Smith evidently understood that this spell of peace and prosperity  would not last. With constant pleading he urged the Saints to increase their  labors on the temple, and they responded with hearty good will. In his prophecy,  August 6, 1842, he declared to his brethren that he was not destined to go with  them to the Rocky Mountains; yet they failed to comprehend his meaning. On  several occasions he intimated in his remarks that his enemies would not be  satisfied with anything short of his life, and then they would pursue others. He  spoke to the Saints at a meeting in the unfinished temple, January 22, 1843,  taking for his text, “The Setting up of the Kingdom of God.” In the course of  his discourse he said: “I shall not be sacrificed until my time comes; then I  shall be offered freely. All flesh is as grass, and a governor is no better  than other men; when he dies he is a bag of dust. I thank God for preserving me  from my enemies. I have no enemies but for the truth’s sake. I have no desire  but to do all men good. I feel to pray for all men. We don’t ask any people to  throw away any good they have got; we only ask them to come and get more. They  would then see eye to eye, and the blessings of God would be poured out upon the  people, which is the desire of my whole soul. Amen.”

 

Doctrinal Development

 

Early in January, 1843, in discoursing on the kingdom of God, the Prophet said:  “Some say the kingdom of God was not set up on the earth until the day of  Pentecost, and John the Baptist did not preach the baptism for repentance for  the remission of sins. But I say, in the name of the Lord, that the kingdom of  God was set up on the earth from the days of Adam to the present time. . . .  Where there is no kingdom of God, there is no salvation. What constitutes the  kingdom of God? Where there is a prophet, a priest, or a righteous man unto whom  God gives his oracles, there is the kingdom of God; and where the oracles of God  are not, there the kingdom of God is not.” In relation to the Gospel and baptism  preached by John, he said: “John came preaching the Gospel for the remission of  sins. He had his authority from God, and the oracles of God were with him.”  Speaking of the sign of the Holy Ghost, he stated: “The Holy Ghost is a  personage, and in the form of a personage. It does not confine itself to the  form of a dove, but in the sign of a dove. The Holy Ghost cannot be transformed  into the form of a dove; but the sign of a dove was given to John to signify the  truth of the deed [baptism of Christ], as the dove is an emblem or token of  truth and innocence.” In February he received a revelation embodying the  following principle: There are two kinds of beings in heaven; angels, who are  resurrected personages, having bodies of flesh and bones; and spirits of just  men made perfect who are not yet resurrected, but inherit the same glory. In  April, 1843, he gave instructions at Ramus, as follows: “When the Savior shall  appear, we shall see him as he is. We shall see that he is a man like ourselves  and that same sociality which exists among us here will exist among us there,  only it will be coupled with eternal glory, which glory we do not now enjoy.”  The reckoning of God’s time, angel’s time and man’s time is according to the  planet on which they reside. All angels who minister on this earth, have  belonged to it. Angels reside in the presence of God on a globe like a sea of  glass and fire, where all things for their glory are manifest. The place where  God dwells is a great Urim and Thummim. This earth, in its sanctified and  immortal state, will be like unto crystal and will be a Urim and Thummim to the  inhabitants who dwell thereon, whereby all things pertaining to an inferior  kingdom, or all kingdoms of a lower order, will be manifest to those who dwell  on it. The white stone mentioned in Revelation 2:17 will become a Urim and  Thummim to each individual who receives one, through which things of a higher  order will be made known. Again, he taught that all principles of intelligence  we attain unto in this life, will rise with us in the resurrection. The Father  has a body of flesh and bones as has the Son, Jesus Christ, also, but the Holy  Ghost is a personage of Spirit. During the time of the trial at Springfield, in  answer to questions, he said: “Christ and the resurrected Saints will reign over  the earth during the thousand years. They will not probably dwell upon the  earth, but will visit it when they please, or when it is necessary to govern it.  There will be wicked men on the earth during the thousand years. The heathen  nations who will not come up to worship will be visited with the judgments of  God.” In this manner, in conversations, discourses and writings, the Prophet  taught the people.

 

Attempt to Repeal the Nauvoo Charter

 

When Governor Thomas Ford delivered his inaugural address in December, 1842, he  recommended modification of the Nauvoo charter, on the grounds that many  objections had been raised because of exceptional powers, which had been  granted. Yet these powers had proved beneficial to the Saints, and where  righteous government was administered, as it was in Nauvoo, such a charter  proved to be a blessing. In the hands of despots such privileges might have been  abused. When the charter was granted, the prophet said: “The city charter of  Nauvoo is of my own plan and device. I concocted it for the salvation of the  Church, and on principles so broad, that every honest man might dwell secure  under its protective influence without distinction of sect or party.” A bill was  presented in the legislature to repeal certain sections of the charter shortly  after that body convened. The enemies of the Saints endeavored to repeal much  more than had at first been contemplated, and take from the charter many  provisions like those found in the charters of the other cities in Illinois.  This attempt was made purposely to hurt the “Mormons,” by restricting their  rights. The bill passed the house in March with a vote of 58 to 33. When it  reached the senate it was tabled. The time for the repeal had not arrived.

 

A General Missionary Call

 

At the conference of the Church in April, 1843, a general missionary movement  was contemplated. President Joseph Smith, in the course of his remarks, advised  that the elders when they went forth as missionaries, should preach repentance  and the things they were sent to preach. “Declare the first principles,” he  said, “and let mysteries alone, lest you be overthrown. Never meddle with the  visions of beasts and subjects you do not understand.” Following the general  conference a special conference convened April 10, and continued through the  12th, presided over by the apostles. At this conference elders were chosen and  their appointments given for various mission fields in Canada and the several  states, excepting blighted Missouri. On the 11th of May, following, Addison  Pratt, Noah Rogers, Benjamin B. Grouard and Knowlton F. Hanks, were selected to  go on missions to the Pacific isles; Dan Jones, to Wales; James Sloan, to  Ireland; John Cairnes and Samuel James to England, with Reuben Hedlock, who was  appointed to preside in Great Britain with Hiram Clark and Thomas Ward, who were  in England, as his assistants.

 

Eternity of the Marriage Covenant

 

While at Ramus, May 16 and 17, 1843, the Prophet made the following declaration:

 

 “In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees; and in order to  obtain the highest, a man must enter in to this order of the Priesthood (meaning  the new and everlasting covenant of marriage); and if he does not, he cannot  obtain it.

 

“He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom; he cannot have  an increase.

 

“Salvation means a man’s being placed beyond the power of all his enemies.

 

“The more sure word of prophecy (mentioned by Peter) means a man’s knowing that  he is sealed up unto eternal life, by revelation and the spirit of prophecy,  through the power of the Holy Priesthood.

 

“It is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance.

 

“There is no such thing as immaterial matter. All spirit is matter, but it is  more fine or pure, and can only be discerned by purer eyes.

 

“We cannot see it; but when our bodies are purified we shall see that it is all  matter.”

 

The New and Everlasting Covenant

 

A revelation dealing with the subject of marriage for eternity, or celestial  marriage as it is known, was reduced to writing July 12, 1843 (Doc. and Cov.  Sec. 132). It had been revealed to the Prophet a long time before this date, but  had not been recorded or publicly announced. In it the Lord defines the “new and  everlasting covenant.” In a number of revelations previously given the new and  everlasting covenant is mentioned, and various principles of the Gospel are  spoken of as new and everlasting covenants. Thus, in the Lord’s Preface to the  Book of Doctrine and Covenants, he says he gave commandments to Joseph Smith,  that his “everlasting covenant might be established; that the fulness of the  Gospel might be proclaimed.” Immediately after the organization of the Church,  he declared that baptism is a “new and an everlasting covenant, even that which  was from the beginning,” and in a revelation given October 25, 1831 (Doc. and  Cov. Sec. 66), the everlasting covenant is defined as the fulness of the Gospel,  “sent forth unto the children of men, that they might have life and be made  partakers of the glories which are to be revealed.” But the full meaning and  significance of the “new and everlasting covenant,” was not revealed until the  Prophet received this revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 132), in which it is  defined as follows:

 

 “For behold, I reveal unto you a new and an everlasting covenant; and if ye  abide not that covenant, then are ye damned; for no one can reject this covenant  and be permitted to enter into my glory. For all who will have a blessing at my  hands shall abide the law which was appointed for that blessing, and the  conditions thereof, as were instituted from before the foundation of the world.”

 

This reference has bearing on the new covenant of celestial marriage, or  marriage for eternity, spoken of by President Joseph Smith at Ramus in May,  1843. Then the Lord defines the law of the new and everlasting covenant, which  embraces all other covenants and principles belonging to the Gospel:

 

 “And as pertaining to the new and everlasting covenant, it was instituted for  the fulness of my glory; and he that receiveth a fulness thereof must and shall  abide the law, or he shall be damned, saith the Lord God.

 

“And verily I say unto you, that the conditions of this law are these: All  covenants, contracts, bonds, obligations, oaths, vows, performances,  connections, associations, or expectations, that are not made and entered into  and sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, of him who is anointed, both as well  for time and for all eternity, and that too most holy, by revelation and  commandment through the medium of mine anointed, whom I have appointed on the  earth to hold this power (and I have appointed unto my servant Joseph to hold  this power in the last days, and there is never but one on the earth at a time  on whom this power and the keys of this priesthood are conferred), are of no  efficacy, virtue, or force in and after the resurrection from the dead; for all  contracts that are not made unto this end have an end when men are dead.”

 

Conversely, then, all contracts entered into in this life, and sealed by this  authority, are binding and of force after the resurrection, as the revelation  further on declares:

 

 “Behold, mine house is a house of order, saith the Lord, and not a house of  confusion. Will I accept of an offering, saith the Lord, that is not made in my  name? Or will I receive at your hands that which I have not appointed? And will  I appoint unto you, saith the Lord, except it be by law, even as I and my Father  ordained unto you, before the world was? I am the Lord thy God; and I give unto  you this commandment that no man shall come unto the Father but by me or by my  word, which is my law, saith the Lord. And everything that is in the world,  whether it be ordained of men, by thrones, or principalities, or powers, or  things of name, whatsoever they may be, that are not by me or by my word, saith  the Lord, shall be thrown down, and shall not remain after men are dead, neither  in nor after the resurrection, saith the Lord your God. For whatsoever things  remain are by me; and whatsoever things are not by me shall be shaken and  destroyed.”

 

Revealed by Elijah

 

The keys of this wonderful and impressive doctrine were restored when Elijah  conferred his Priesthood. The mission of Elijah in this dispensation, as  prophesied of by Malachi, was to restore the sealing, or binding power, through  which covenants and contracts, as here described by the Lord, are approved and  ratified in the heavens. Referring to this subject, President Joseph Smith  remarked in one of his discourses:

 

 “Elijah was the last prophet that held the keys of the Priesthood. . . . It is  true that the Savior had authority and power to bestow this blessing; but the  sons of Levi were too prejudiced. ‘And I will send Elijah the Prophet before the  great and terrible day of the Lord,’ etc. Why send Elijah? Because he holds the  keys of the authority to administer in all the ordinances of the Priesthood;  and without the authority is given, the ordinances could not be administered in  righteousness.”

 

Again:

 

 “The spirit, power, and calling of Elijah is, that ye have power to hold the key  of the revelation, ordinances, oracles, powers and endowments of the fulness of  the Melchizedek Priesthood and of the kingdom of God on the earth; and to  receive, obtain and perform all the ordinances belonging to the kingdom of God,  even unto the turning of the hearts of the fathers unto the children, and the  hearts of the children unto the fathers, even those who are in heaven. .  . .  What is this office and work of Elijah? It is one of the greatest and most  important subjects that God has revealed. He should send Elijah to seal the  children to the fathers, and the fathers to the children.”

 

In the Temple these Blessings are Obtained

 

In the temple of the Lord these sealing blessings may be obtained. Only in the  days of poverty, when there is no temple, can they be received elsewhere. The  Prophet added further instruction to this subject in a discourse, Sunday, June  11, 1843, wherein he said:

 

 “One of the ordinances of the house of the Lord is baptism for the dead. God  decreed before the foundation of the world that that ordinance should be  administered in a font prepared for that purpose in the house of the Lord.

 

“If a man gets a fulness of the Priesthood of God, he has to get it in the same  way that Jesus Christ obtained it, and that was by keeping all the commandments  and obeying all the ordinances of the house of the Lord. . . .

 

“All men who become heirs of God and joint-heirs with Jesus Christ, will have to  receive the fulness of the ordinances of his kingdom; and those who will not  receive all the ordinances will come short of the fulness of that glory, if they  do not lose the whole” (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 5:423).

 

Plural Marriage

 

This revelation, dated July 12, 1843, also contains the doctrine of plural  wives. This doctrine was made known to the Prophet as early as the summer of  1831, and by him was taught to a few others, but it was not practiced until the  Lord commanded it. Secrecy was imposed by the Lord until such time as he saw fit  for its introduction. When the Prophet was commanded to practice this principle,  he hesitated and deferred taking action for some time. To do so was one of the  greatest trials of his life. He knew the doctrine was in conflict with the  traditions and teachings of the world and would arouse increased persecution;  moreover, his own prejudices were in opposition to the doctrine. However, the  Lord had commanded him and he must act.

 

In Nauvoo the doctrine was revealed to many of the leading brethren, and wives  were sealed to some of them by President Joseph Smith, and to others, under his  direction. However, it was not until 1852, after the Saints had come to Utah,  that the revelation was published to the world.

 

The Douglas Prophecy

 

On the return from Ramus, where the doctrine of the eternity of marriage was  taught to a number of brethren, President Joseph Smith and his scribe, William  Clayton, paid a visit to Judge Stephen A. Douglas, at Carthage, where he was  holding court. On invitation they dined with Judge Douglas, and after dinner he  requested President Smith to relate the history of the persecutions of the  Saints while in Missouri. This he did in some detail, covering a period of about  three hours. He also gave an account of his visit to Washington, with Judge  Elias Higbee and Sidney Rigdon, in 1839, and their treatment by President Martin  Van Buren, Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun and others. Judge Douglas listened with  the closest attention and deprecated the conduct of Governor Boggs and his  aides in Missouri. He said that any people who would do as the Missourians had  done to the Latter-day Saints ought to be brought to judgment and punished.

 

President Smith, in concluding the conversation, uttered the following prophecy  which was recorded in the journal of his secretary, William Clayton, under date  of the event, May 18, 1843:

 

 “Judge, you will aspire to the presidency of the United States; and if ever you  turn your hand against me or the Latter-day Saints, you will feel the weight of  the hand of the Almighty upon you; and you will live to see and know that I have  testified the truth to you; for the conversation of this day will stick to you  through life.”1

 

Notes

 

 1. Stephen A. Douglas lived to see the fulfilment of this prophecy. He did  aspire to the presidency of the United States. He did raise his voice against  the Latter-day Saints in a speech delivered in Springfield, Illinois, June 12,  1857. The speech was published in the “Missouri Republican.” While Mr. Douglas  had more reason to expect to be elected than any other candidate, he was  overwhelmingly defeated, and Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United  States.

 

For full particulars in relation to this subject, the reader is referred to the  History of the Mormon Church , chapter 46, by Elder B. H. Roberts.

 

 

Chapter 33  Missouri’s Third Attempt to Capture Joseph Smith. 1843

 

Conspiracy Against Joseph Smith

 

When John C. Bennett wrote to Sidney Rigdon and Orson Pratt, saying he was on  his way to Missouri to obtain a new requisition for Joseph Smith and others, it  was not an idle threat. Not many weeks had passed before reports reached Nauvoo  that new indictments had been found against President Smith, based on the old  Missouri charges, and that John C. Bennett was making desperate threats.  Moreover, Bennett must have had some definite information which caused him to  say that Governor Ford would acknowledge the new requisition. A conspiracy,  evidently, was on foot, in which the governors of the two states were to play  their parts. Further evidence that Governor Ford was a party to the conspiracy  is discovered in a communication dated June 10, 1843, from Sam C. Owens of  Independence, to the governor of Illinois. Owens, one of the bitterest  persecutors of the Saints in Missouri, stated in his letter that John C. Bennett  had authorized him to write to Governor Ford, “without hesitation” in regard to  the charges against Joseph Smith. “At the last term of the circuit court of  Daviess County,” he wrote, “an indictment was found by the grand jury against  Joseph Smith for treason against the state,” and necessary papers were on the  way to Governor Thomas Reynolds, who, on receipt thereof, would issue a  requisition, and Mr. Joseph H. Reynolds would be sent as a special agent “to  attend to the business.” Owens also said that “Dr. Bennett further writes that  he has made an agreement with Harmon T. Wilson, of Hancock County (Carthage seat  of justice), in whose hands he wishes the writ that shall be issued by you to be  put. From the tenor of his letter I am induced to believe that he has made the  same suggestion to you.”

 

A Warrant for His Arrest

 

June 13, 1843, Governor Reynolds issued the requisition and Joseph H. Reynolds  was dispatched to Illinois. Governor Ford lost no time in issuing the warrant  for the arrest and placed it in the hands of Harmon T. Wilson, who, with  Reynolds, immediately started for their prisoner. The night before the warrant  was issued Governor Ford incidentally remarked to Judge James Adams that the  next day he would issue such a writ. Judge Adams sent an express at once to  Nauvoo to warn the Prophet of impending danger. His message arrived in the  evening of Sunday, June 18, but President Smith was not at home. On the 13th, he  and his family had gone north to visit with Mrs. Wasson, sister of Emma Smith,  who resided near Dixon, Lee County, Illinois. Hyrum Smith sent William Clayton  and Stephen Markham on horse back with all speed to warn his brother Joseph.  They arrived at Wasson’s on the afternoon of Wednesday, June 21, a distance of  two hundred and twelve miles. Hearing their report, Joseph said: “I have no  fear. I shall not leave here; I shall find friends, and Missourians cannot hurt  me, I tell you in the name of the Lord.” He cancelled an appointment to preach  in Dixon, and concluded to remain with the Wassons, fearing that if he started  for home he might fall into the hands of his enemies where he had no friends.

 

His Arrest by Reynolds and Wilson

 

From some source Reynolds and Wilson learned that Joseph was at Dixon and  thither they went with haste. On the way to Wasson’s they passed William  Clayton, who had been sent to spy out the land, but as they were disguised,  Clayton did not know them. Arriving at their destination the sheriffs  represented themselves to be “Mormon” elders and were directed to the Wasson  home. President Smith was in the yard when they arrived. Springing upon him like  fiends, and without showing any papers for his arrest, they pointed cocked  pistols at his head and with many vile oaths, threatened to shoot him if he  stirred. They repeatedly jabbed the muzzles of their pistols in his ribs, and  were for hurrying him off to Dixon without giving him a chance to say farewell  to his family or friends, or obtain his hat and coat. Stephen Markham grabbed  the horses by the bits and held them saying: “There is no law on earth that  requires a sheriff to take a prisoner without his clothes.” They threatened to  shoot him, but he paid no heed to their threats, and Emma Smith brought her  husband his hat and coat. As the wagon rolled away, Joseph called to Markham to  go to Dixon and secure a writ of habeas corpus. On the way the officers  repeatedly thrust their pistols in the Prophet’s sides with accompanying oaths  of blasphemy, and did not desist until shortly before reaching Dixon, when  Markham, who had overtaken them, upbraided them for their cowardice and brutal  treatment of their prisoner, who was defenseless.

 

Arriving at Dixon, the officers placed their prisoner in a room of the tavern,  and ordered fresh horses to be ready in five minutes. Joseph asked them if he  could interview counsel, but was cruelly treated for his request. A man passed  the window and the Prophet shouted to him to secure him a lawyer, for he was  falsely imprisoned. Attorney Edward Southwick came to the door, but it was shut  in his face, with a threat. Shepherd G. Patrick, another attorney, also came and  was insulted in like manner. The neighborhood was soon aroused, and Mr. Dixon,  owner of the house, with some friends surrounded the door and threatened  violence to the inhuman sheriffs if they did not alter their brutal course. This  had a sobering effect upon them, and lawyers Southwick and Patrick came into  the room. President Smith showed them his bruised sides, and asked them to  obtain a writ of habeas corpus. A messenger was sent by Mr. Dixon to Mr.  Chamberlain, master-in-chancery, who lived some six miles away, and another  messenger was sent for Attorney Cyrus Walker, who happened to be campaigning  near that place. Walker, Whig candidate for Congress, said he would come  provided Joseph Smith would promise to vote for him, which the latter said he  would do. This promise, Walker thought, would give him the united vote of the  “Mormon” people, which would insure his election. About eight o’clock the  master-in-chancery arrived and issued a writ of habeas corpus returnable before  Judge John D. Caton, of the ninth judicial district, at Ottawa, which was served  on Reynolds and Wilson. The same day William Clayton was sent by the Prophet to  notify his brother Hyrum, and get assistance.

 

Reynolds and Wilson Under Arrest

 

Stephen Markham went before a justice of the peace and obtained a warrant for  Reynolds and Wilson for threatening his life. He later obtained other warrants  from the circuit court of Lee County against them for threatening the life of  Joseph Smith, and for false imprisonment, claiming ten thousand dollars damages,  on the ground that the writ issued by Governor Ford was a void writ in law. As they could not obtain bondsmen outside of Missouri, they were taken into custody  by Sheriff Campbell of Lee County. They also obtained a writ of habeas corpus  and under these circumstances the entire party, including the lawyers and Mr.  Dixon, started for Ottawa.

 

President Joseph Smith’s Discourse at Pawpaw Grove

 

Saturday night, June 24, they arrived at Pawpaw Grove, thirty-two miles distant  from Dixon, and the following morning the people assembled at the hotel and  requested that the Prophet preach. To this Reynolds objected, saying that Joseph  Smith was his prisoner, and the people must disperse. They had witnessed his  abuse of his prisoner, and a Mr. David Town, an aged gentleman, who was lame,  advanced and gave Reynolds to understand that he could not interrupt gentlemen.  Bringing his heavy walking stick down with a thud, he said:

 

 “You Infernal puke, we’ll learn you to come here and interrupt gentlemen. Sit  down there (pointing to a very low chair), and sit still. Don’t open your head  till General Smith gets through talking. If you never learned manners in  Missouri, we’ll teach you that gentlemen are not to be imposed upon by a  nigger-driver. You cannot kidnap men here, if you do in Missouri; and if you  attempt it here, there’s a committee in this grove that will sit on your case;  and, sir, it is the highest tribunal in the United States, as  from its decision  there is no appeal!”

 

Reynolds very meekly and in fear took the seat while President Smith addressed  the people for one hour and a half.

 

The Issuing of New Writs

 

It was learned that Judge Caton was in New York, so they all returned to Dixon,  where new writs were obtained, made returnable before the nearest tribunal in  the fifth judicial district, at Markham’s request. Provision was now made to go  to Quincy, where Judge Stephen A. Douglas was holding court. Twice on the way  Reynolds and Wilson engaged in plots to raise mobs and carry Joseph Smith to the  mouth of Rock River where there was a company from Missouri waiting to receive  him; but each time the plans were discovered and foiled.

 

On the way Joseph convinced Sheriff Campbell and the attorneys that the court of  Nauvoo was nearer than that of Quincy, and had full power to try his case, and  hither they bent their way. Reynolds and Wilson endeavored to get Sheriff  Campbell, who had them in custody, to go by way of Rock River, to Quincy, not  knowing that their plots were discovered, saying that they would never go  through Nauvoo alive. Joseph Smith pledged his word of honor that they would not  be molested, and the journey was resumed by land in the direction of Nauvoo.

 

A Party to the Rescue

 

William Clayton arrived in Nauvoo on Sunday, June 25, 1843, and at the afternoon  meeting in the temple Hyrum Smith requested to see all the brethren. He informed  them of his brother Joseph’s arrest, and called for volunteers to go to his  assistance. That evening a company of about one hundred and seventy-five men  left on horseback. Wilson Law refused to go unless his expenses could be met,  whereupon President Brigham Young went to work and raised seven hundred dollars  by subscription. About seventy-five men on board the  Maid of Iowa, under  Captain Dan Jones, went down the Mississippi to the mouth of the Illinois River,  thence up that river toward Peoria, to examine the steamboats, suspecting the  Prophet might be forced on one of them to be carried down the river to Missouri.

 

Shortly after the party with the Prophet left Geneseo on the 27th, the advance  guard of the brethren, nine in all, from Nauvoo came up, and Reynolds and Wilson  began to tremble fearing for their lives. Reynolds asked if “Jim” Flack was in  the crowd. When he was informed that he would be present the next day, the  criminal sheriff replied: “Then I am a dead man; for I know him of old.” When  Stephen Markham, who had gone to locate the brethren from Nauvoo, rode up,  Reynolds said, “Do I meet you as a friend? I expected to be a dead man when I  met you again,” but he was assured that he would not be hurt. Thursday, June 29,  James Flack with others of the brethren met the company a short distance south  of Monmouth. President Joseph Smith took Flack to one side and charged him not  to harm Reynolds, for he had given his word of honor that he would not be  injured. This Flack promised to do although he had cause for vengeance.

 

Arrival at Nauvoo

 

Other bodies of men from Nauvoo joined the company from time to time and when  they reached that place there were about one hundred and forty riding on horse  back, who were joined by the populace in procession and thus they marched into  the town. President Smith was greeted with cheers and the firing of cannon. He  was still a prisoner in the hands of Reynolds and Wilson, and they in turn were  prisoners in the hands of Sheriff Campbell. The Prophet took them to his house  and placed Reynolds and Wilson at the head of the table, where about fifty  persons were served. This was a very different reception from the one he had  received from these men when they took him prisoner in Lee County, at the  Wasson home.

 

The Trial Before the Municipal Court

 

The same day they arrived in Nauvoo the municipal court convened, and a  requisition was made on Reynolds to return the writ, but he refused to recognize  the summons, whereupon the Prophet petitioned the court for a writ of habeas  corpus to be directed to Reynolds, commanding him to bring his prisoner before  the court. The summons was issued and Reynolds complied with the attachment and  delivered the Prophet into the hands of the marshal of the city. That afternoon  President Smith addressed the people at great length, declaring that he would  not peacefully submit again to such ill-treatment. While he was speaking  Reynolds and Wilson with a lawyer named Davis, of Carthage, left for that place  threatening to raise the militia and come again and take President Smith out of  Nauvoo.

 

Saturday, July 1, 1843, the court convened to examine the writ of habeas corpus.  Messrs. Cyrus Walker, Shepherd G. Patrick, Edward Southwick and a Mr. Backman  defended Joseph Smith while Attorney Mason was counselor for Reynolds. Witnesses  were examined and the case tried on its merits, Hyrum Smith, Parley P. Pratt,  Brigham Young, George W. Pitkin, Lyman Wight and Sidney Rigdon giving testimony,  at the conclusion of which the prisoner was discharged.

 

The Citizens of Lee County Thanked

 

July 1, 1843, a mass meeting of the citizens of Nauvoo was held in the assembly  hall and it was “unanimously resolved that Messrs. Sager and Dixon, of the town  of Dixon, and the citizens of Dixon, Pawpaw Grove, and Lee County, receive the  warmest thanks for the firm patriotism, bold and decided stand taken against  lawless outrage and the spirit of mobocracy, as manifested in the arrest or  capture of General Joseph Smith, while on a visit to his friends in that  district of country.”

 

Reynolds’ Further Attempt to Obtain Joseph Smith

 

The proceedings of the municipal court of Nauvoo in this case were promptly  forwarded to Governor Ford, with affidavits from the attorneys and others  bearing upon the case and the kindly treatment Reynolds and Wilson had received  in Nauvoo. Judge James Adams came from Carthage with the information that  Reynolds and Wilson were exciting the people there to mobocracy, and petitioning  the governor for a posse forcibly to take Joseph Smith, on the grounds that he  had been unlawfully taken out of their hands. A remonstrance against the  Carthage proceedings was prepared and forwarded to Carthage by Messrs. Southwick  and Patrick, and a petition was sent to Governor Ford praying him not to issue  any more writs.

 

Governor Ford refused to comply with the request of Sheriff Reynolds, and  subsequently, when Governor Reynolds of Missouri requested him to call out the  militia a method they had of doing in Missouri to retake Joseph Smith, Governor  Ford replied that Joseph Smith had been tried before the municipal court of  Nauvoo on a writ of habeas corpus, and discharged from arrest. He, as governor,  had fully executed the duty which the laws imposed, and had not “been resisted  either in the writ issued for the arrest of Smith or in the person of the  officer appointed to apprehend him,” and the constitution would not permit him  to take such action, as the Missouri official proposed.

 

The Case of O. P. Rockwell

 

Orrin Porter Rockwell, who was accused as the principal in the shooting of  ex-Governor Boggs, went into retirement with the Prophet when Governor Ford  issued papers for his extradition. He traveled east as far as New Jersey where  he remained for some time. Following the discharge of President Joseph Smith by  Judge Pope, Rockwell concluded to return to Nauvoo, evidently by way of the Ohio  and Mississippi Rivers. In St. Louis he was recognized by Elias Parker who had  him placed under arrest, March 4, 1843. They carried him to Independence in  chains, where he was placed under bonds in the sum of five thousand dollars,  which they knew he could not raise, as no person outside of Missouri would be  accepted by the court as bondsman. In the custody of the notorious Joseph H.  Reynolds, sheriff of Jackson County, he was cast into prison bound hand and  foot. Here he remained a prisoner for eight months. March 15, 1843, the Prophet  wrote: “I prophesied in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, that Orrin Porter  Rockwell would get away honorably from the Missourians.”

 

On Christmas evening, 1843 the last Christmas day Joseph and Hyrum Smith  celebrated on earth a large party assembled at the Prophet’s home, and spent the  time in music, dancing and a social visit. During the festivities, a man with  long shaggy hair, apparently drunk, came in and acted like a Missourian. A  scuffle ensued and the Prophet had an opportunity to see the stranger’s face. To  his great surprise and joy he discovered his “long-tried, warm, but cruelly  persecuted friend, Orrin Porter Rockwell.” The party came to order while  Rockwell related in detail his experiences and sufferings while in Missouri.

 

Orrin P. Rockwell’s Story

 

The story is too long to tell in full at this point. It is sufficient to relate  the following incidents. When he arrived in Independence a large crowd had  gathered and suggested hanging him at once, but he was placed in jail. In two or  three days he underwent a mock trial, where false witnesses testified against  him. The magistrate said he found no evidence against him, but placed him in  prison for safe keeping, where Sheriff Reynolds chained him hand and foot. One  time he was able to escape, but was recaptured and only by the providence of the  Lord was saved from being hanged. About the time that President Smith was  demanded by the governor of Missouri, Reynolds, the sheriff, came to Rockwell  and said that he had discovered from letters that Joseph Smith had unlimited  confidence in Rockwell, and if Rockwell would only “tote him out by riding or  any other way,” so that the Missourians might apprehend him, Rockwell might  please himself whether he stayed in Illinois or returned to Missouri, they would  protect him, and any pile that he would name the citizens of Jackson County,  would club together and raise. “You only deliver Joe Smith into our hands, and  name your pile.” Rockwell replied: “I will see you all damned first, and then I  won’t.”

 

The time of further trial was continually delayed, but on the 13th of December,  he was taken before the court and tried not on the charge of shooting Boggs, but  for breaking jail! He was found guilty and sentenced to “five minutes’  imprisonment in the county jail,” but was kept there five hours, while his  enemies tried to think of some other charge to make against him. He was finally  released and with great difficulty made his way to Nauvoo, where he arrived that  Christmas night.

 

 Chapter 34 Joseph Smith’s Candidacy for President. Nauvoo Conspiracy. 1843 through 1844

 

Threats of the Mob

 

Following the unsuccessful attempt to carry President Joseph Smith into  Missouri, the hatred of his enemies became intense. Lying accusations were  published in anti-“Mormon” papers and circulated against the Saints. Threats  were made, both in Missouri and Illinois, of mob attacks and the legion was kept  in readiness to withstand any mob assault. The governor was apprised of these  conditions from time to time, and petitioned for protection, but refused to give  credence to the rumors, or take any measures to repel any proposed invasion.  This attitude increased the boldness of the enemies of the Saints, who declared,  in reference to the governor, should he attempt to protect the “Mormons” in  their rights: “If he opens his head we will punch a hole through him! He dare  not speak! We will serve him the same sauce we will the ‘Mormons!’”

 

Growth of Nauvoo

 

Through the gathering of converts from Great Britain as well as from various  parts of the United States, Nauvoo had become the foremost city of Illinois. It  had risen from a swamp and wilderness in 1839, to a commonwealth of some twenty  thousand souls. The people were frugal, industrious and law-abiding. Many  factories had been established, and measures were on foot, at the suggestion of  President Smith, to dam the Mississippi for water power purposes. He also  suggested that Congress be petitioned to build a canal around the Des Moines  rapids to admit of the passage of boats for commercial purposes.1 He instructed  the Saints to be producers and to manufacture from the raw materials, rather  than to be consumers only, and under his direction and inspiration the city  prospered.

 

Jealousy of Other Towns

 

All this augmented the jealousy and hatred of the neighboring towns, where  thrift and unity were lacking. Another thing that increased the opposition,  especially of the politicians, was the fact that the Saints usually voted as a  unit. It was this tendency which caused Cyrus Walker to seek the favor of Joseph  Smith in the summer of 1843. However, the voting of the “Mormons” in this manner  was not due to instruction from the leading councils of the Church, but from  necessity and for self-preservation. Both the Whig and the Democratic  office-seekers sought the support of the Saints, and when it was not  forthcoming, hatred filled their breasts, and vengeance was threatened. The  constant arrival of immigrants, who were instructed to gather at Nauvoo, was  also looked upon as an attempt to lay plans to control the state. So strong were  the Latter-day Saints that they held the balance of power in the elections and  naturally threw their support to those most friendly to them, which aroused the  animosities of their opponents to a murderous degree.

 

In the August (1843) election Robert D. Foster and George W. Thatcher were  elected to county offices. They went to Carthage to give bonds and take their  oaths and were threatened by Harmon T. Wilson and some fifteen or twenty others,  who were armed with knives and pistols. The bonds, however, were accepted, and  the mob gave notice of a meeting of anti-“Mormons” to consider the question of  the “Mormons” holding office. At their meeting they made all manner of  accusations and threats, stating that they “pledge themselves in the most  determined manner” to aid Missouri should another demand be made for Joseph  Smith, which gave encouragement to the enemies of the Saints within that state.

 

Near the close of the year 1843, they openly resorted to mob violence. Daniel  Avery and his son Philander, were kidnapped and delivered to the Missourians. On  false accusations they were imprisoned and brutally treated for some time. The  son finally made his escape and the father was later released on habeas corpus  proceedings.

 

Joseph Smith and the Presidency of the United States

 

From the time of the organization of the Church the Saints had suffered most  cruelly at the hands of enemies. Governors and lesser state dignitaries, had  aided in the persecutions. No redress, even from the government of the United  States, could be obtained. Mobs still menaced them, and their chances for  protection by lawful means were not the best, for the governor of Illinois was  intimidated by mob threats. It was agreed, therefore, to inquire of the various  candidates for the presidency of the United States what their feelings would be,  if elected, towards the Latter-day Saints, and their course of action in  relation to the cruel oppression the Saints had suffered. Accordingly letters  were sent to the leading candidates. Only two, Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun,  deigned to make reply. Their answers were so unsatisfactory that the “Mormon”  people decided they could vote for neither of them. Clay replied that if he ever  entered that high office he must go into it free and unfettered, with no  guarantees but such as were to be drawn from his whole life, character and  conduct, although he had sympathized with the Saints in their sufferings under  injustice. Calhoun was more frank, stating that the case of the Saints in  Missouri, candor compelled him to say, “did not come within the jurisdiction of  the Federal Government, which is one of limited and specific powers.”

 

Under these conditions the citizens of Nauvoo felt that the only consistent step  they could take was to place their own candidate in the field. Consequently, at  a political convention held in Nauvoo, January 29, 1844, Joseph Smith was  nominated as a candidate for the presidency of the United States, and on May 17,  a state convention was held in Nauvoo where his nomination was sustained. There  was no thought on the part of President Joseph Smith or the Saints that he would  be elected, but it gave to them an opportunity to express their feelings, and to  sustain a candidate who would advocate their rights against oppression. In the  Times and Seasons (Feb. 15) an editorial was published entitled: “Who Shall be  our Next President?” in which the reasons for selecting their own candidate were  clearly and emphatically stated by the editor (John Taylor) in behalf of the  Latter-day Saints.

 

James Arlington Bennett, of New York, was asked to become their candidate for  the vice-presidency, but as he was born in Ireland, was not eligible. Sidney  Rigdon, who had moved from Nauvoo to Pittsburgh contrary to revelation and to  the feelings of the Prophet  was selected for that place.

 

Views on the Powers and Policy of the Government

 

In February, 1844, Joseph Smith published to the world his “Views on the Powers  and Policy of the Government of the United States.” After speaking of the  greatness and glory of the United States under the early presidents he says that  “‘since the fathers have fallen asleep,’ wicked and designing men have unrobed  the government of its glory.” He advocated the reduction of the number of  congressmen by two-thirds; the pardoning of prisoners in state prisons; the  making of laws to provide for useful employment of prisoners on roads, public  works or elsewhere, where they may be taught more wisdom and more virtue, and  only murderers should be confined or put to death. He would turn the prisons  into seminaries of learning; and petition the inhabitants of the slave states to  abolish slavery by 1850, or before, “and save the abolitionist from reproach and  ruin, infamy and shame.” This should be done by Congress paying every man a  reasonable price for his slaves out of the revenue from the sale of public  lands, and deducted pay from members of Congress, that liberty may be granted to  all men. He would abolish the practice of trying men by court martial for  desertion, and if a man deserts send him his pay with instructions that his  country will never trust him more and that he has forfeited his honor. Make  honor the standard with all men; render good for evil, “and the whole nation,  like a kingdom of kings and priests, will rise up in righteousness.” He  advocated more economy; less taxes; greater equality, and less distinction among  the people. Also the establishment of a national bank, with branches in each  state and territory, the net revenue therefrom to be applied to government  interests. The president should have full power to send an army to suppress  mobs, and there should be a repeal of the requirement for governors to petition  the president for troops in cases of invasion or rebellion. A governor himself  may be a mobber and power should be given the president to protect citizens in  such an event. Oregon, by right, and with the consent of the Indian, should  belong to the United States, and he would invite Texas, Canada, Mexico, to join  the sons of liberty, and let the Union spread.

 

Such, in brief, is the platform of Joseph Smith, and when it was circulated  throughout the United States, it created much commotion and favorable comment  for its direct and fearless advocacy of principles which other candidates, for  policy’s sake, dared not express.

 

The Contemplated Expedition to the West

 

The rising tide of persecution portended a repetition of the cruel Missouri  scenes. President Joseph Smith knew full well, even in the face of continued  urging of the Saints to build Nauvoo and make her towers glorious, that the time  would come when they would have to seek a new home in the wilderness. The  prophecy of August 6, 1842, had stamped this fact upon the minds of others, and  the Prophet had referred to it from time to time. He records in his history  under date of February 20, 1844, the following:

 

 “I instructed the Twelve Apostles to send out a delegation and investigate the  locations of California and Oregon, and hunt out a good location, where we can  remove to after the temple is completed, and where we can build a city in a day,  and have a government of our own, get up into the mountains, where the devil  cannot dig us out, and live in a healthful climate, where we can live as old as  we have a mind to.”

 

The next day another meeting was held in the mayor’s office, in Nauvoo, most of  the twelve were present, and Jonathan Dunham, Phineas H. Young, David D.  Yearsley, and David Fullmer, volunteered to go. Alphonzo Young, James Emmett,  George D. Watt and Daniel Spencer were requested to go, and another meeting was  called to meet on February 23, to further discuss matters pertaining to this  expedition. On that date President Smith and the twelve met again. Patriarch  Hyrum Smith and Sidney Rigdon were also present. The Prophet instructed them  saying he wanted an exploration of all the mountain country. Perhaps it would be  best for them to go by way of Santa Fe. “Send twenty-five men,” he said, “let  them preach the Gospel wherever they go. Let that man go that can raise $500, a  good horse and mule, a double-barrel gun, one barrel rifle and the other smooth  bore, a saddle and bridle, a pair of revolving pistols, bowie-knife, and a good  sabre. Appoint a leader and let them beat up for volunteers. I want every man  that goes to be a king and a priest. When he gets on the mountains he may want  to talk with his God; when with the savage nations, have power to govern. If we  don’t get volunteers, wait till after the election.” On this occasion, Samuel  Bent, Joseph A. Kelting, Samuel Rolf, Daniel Avery and Samuel W. Richards were  added to the expedition and others joined from time to time. Sunday, February  25, the Prophet predicted that within five years the Saints would be out of the  power of their old enemies, whether they were apostate or of the world, and  commanded the brethren to write it down “that when it comes to pass they need  not say they had forgotten the saying.”

 

Memorial to Congress

 

March 26, 1844, a memorial was prepared by President Joseph Smith asking  Congress to pass an ordinance for the protection of citizens of the United  States emigrating to the territories and that indefinite country known as  California and Oregon. He asked for authorization to raise a company of one  hundred thousand volunteers, at such times and places as he might find necessary  for this purpose. At this time Oregon was a disputed territory, unsettled, and  held by the United States and Great Britain jointly by treaty. Texas was asking  for admission into the United States, but had been denied. Orson Pratt and John  E. Page and later Orson Hyde, were sent to Washington to urge the consideration  of the scheme. Most of the Illinois delegation favored it. For political reasons  no official action was ever taken, but the general sentiment of the politicians,  who were afraid to act openly, was in favor of the proposition.

 

Traitors From Within

 

It was not so much from Missouri and among the mobocrats of Illinois, that the  Prophet had cause to fear, but from traitors within the councils of the Church.  In the highest quorums, men were found who secretly plotted against his life. He  remarked in a discourse in October of 1843: “This generation is as corrupt as  the generation of the Jews that crucified Christ; and if he were here today, and  should preach the same doctrine he did to them they would put him to death. I  defy all the world to destroy the work of God; and I prophesy they never will  have power to kill me till my work is accomplished, and I am ready to die.” In  January, 1844, it became necessary to increase the police force for the  protection of the city. Joseph Smith, as mayor, addressed these newly appointed  officers of the peace, and instructed them in their duties. In the course of his  remarks he said:

 

 “I am exposed to far greater danger from traitors among ourselves than from  enemies without, although my life has been sought for many years by the civil  and military authorities, priests, and people of Missouri; and if I can escape  from the ungrateful treachery of assassins, I can live as Caesar might have  lived, were it not for a right-hand Brutus. I have had pretended friends betray  me. All the enemies upon the face of the earth may roar and exert all their  power to bring about my death, but they can accomplish nothing, unless some who  are among us and enjoy our society, have been with us in our councils,  participated in our confidence, taken us by the hand, called us brother, saluted  us with a kiss, join with our enemies, turn our virtues into faults, and, by  falsehood and deceit, stir up their wrath and indignation against us, and bring  their united vengeance upon our heads. All the hue-and-cry of the chief priests  and elders against the Savior, could not bring down the wrath of the Jewish  nation upon his head, and thereby cause the crucifixion of the Son of God, until  Judas said unto them, ‘Whomsoever I shall kiss, he is the man; hold him fast.’  Judas was one of the Twelve Apostles, even their treasurer, and dipt with their  Master in the dish, and through his treachery, the crucifixion was brought  about; and we have a Judas in our midst.”

 

“The Wicked Flee”

 

These remarks gave offense to William and Wilson Law, William Marks, Leonard  Soby, Dr. Foster and others. William Law was the Prophet’s second counselor, and  his brother had been honored with the position of major general of the Nauvoo  Legion, and was also prominent in the Church. William Marks was president of the  Nauvoo Stake of Zion. Commenting on their fears, President Joseph Smith stated:  “What can be the matter with these men? Is it that the wicked flee when no man  pursueth .  . . or that Presidents Law and Marks are absolutely traitors to the  Church, that my remarks should produce such excitement in their minds? Can it be  possible that the traitor whom Porter Rockwell reports to me as being in  correspondence with my Missouri enemies is one of my quorum?2  The people in the  town are astonished, almost every man saying to his neighbor, “Is it possible  that Brother Law or Marks is a traitor, and would deliver Brother Joseph into  the hands of his enemies in Missouri? If not what can be the meaning of all  this? The righteous are bold as a lion.”

 

Councils of Apostates

 

It soon developed that some of these men were secretly plotting the death of the  Prophet and the destruction of the Church, claiming that he had fallen from his  high and holy calling. Among them were those who had been tinctured by the  wickedness of John C. Bennett, from which they did not recover. Others had been  guilty of immoral conduct within more recent months and had been exposed. Their  vengeance was directed against President Joseph Smith towards whom they now  entertained a murderous spirit.

 

Experience of Scott and Harris

 

In the spring of 1844, a number of secret meetings were held by these  conspirators, to which all whom they could trust among the disaffected spirits,  were invited. Two young men, Denison L. Harris and Robert Scott, the latter  living with the family of William Law, were invited to attend. Young Harris was  also asked to invite his father, Emer Harris. The boys pondered over the  invitation and then consulted with Emer Harris, who concluded to lay the matter  before President Joseph Smith. After hearing the story the Prophet advised the  father to stay away, but said he would like to have the boys attend, but they  must first receive some advice from him. As they were instructed, they attended  the first two meetings and each time made their report to the Prophet. These  gatherings were given over to abuse and falsehood affecting President Smith, and  the discussion of future plans. When the young men reported the second time,  Joseph was in doubt whether they should go again and asked them to visit him  for further instructions just before the third meeting, which, like the others,  was to be held on the Sabbath day. When the time came he said to them: “This  will be the last time that they will admit you into their councils. They will  come to some determination, but be sure that you make no covenant, nor enter  into any obligations whatever with them.” Arriving at the place of meeting the  young men were astonished to see it guarded by men with muskets, and after due  scrutiny they were admitted. In the meeting the Prophet and his brother Hyrum  and others were accused of the most wicked acts. Joseph was called a fallen  prophet, and his death was said to be necessary to save the Church. An oath had  been prepared which each member present was required to take. The candidate  would step forward to the table, where Francis M. Higbee, a justice of the  peace, was stationed, and he would ask: “Are you ready?” Receiving a favorable  reply he administered the following oath:

 

“You solemnly swear, before God and all holy angels, and these your brethren by  whom you are surrounded that you will give your life, your liberty, your  influence, your all, for the destruction of Joseph Smith and his party, so help  you God!”

 

The person being sworn would then say “I do,” after which he would lay down the  Bible on which the oath was taken, and sign his name to a written copy of the  oath in a book, which would then be acknowledged by the justice of the peace.

 

The boys sat in amazement wondering how these men, formerly faithful in the  councils of the Church, could fall so low. In this manner the oath was  administered to about two hundred, among whom were three women, heavily veiled.

 

Their Lives Threatened

 

Presently the turn for the two youths came to take the pledge, and they both  manfully refused, stating that Joseph Smith had done them no harm and they were  too young to understand these things. This aroused the anger of the  conspirators, and when coaxing and argument failed, they threatened them with  death. “Come boys,” they said, “do as we have done. You are young, and will not  have anything to do in the affair, but we want you should keep it a secret, and  act with us; that’s all.” “No,” they replied, “we cannot take an oath like that  against any man who has never done us any injury.” They tried to pass out, but  one of the band stopped them saying: “No, not by a ! You know all our plans and  arrangements, and we don’t propose that you should leave in that style. You’ve  got to take the oath, or you’ll never leave here alive.” The boys were  surrounded by these evil conspirators, who with drawn swords and knives, were  determined to take their lives. The leaders, no less determined, concluded that  the deed of blood could not be committed there, as the house was too near the  street. So the young men were taken to the cellar and preparations were made for  their murder. At this point, however, as if by an act of Providence, someone  spoke up and said it was evidently known by the parents of these boys that they  were there, and if they did not return a search would be put on foot that might  prove to be very dangerous to the plotters. The result was that after some  consultation they were released, with a strict injunction, and many threats,  not to reveal to any one what they had heard, or they would be killed, and under  a guard they were permitted to depart. They immediately took their course  towards the river in the opposite direction from their homes, conveying the  impression to their enemies by word and act, that they would keep their secret.  On the river bank they met the Prophet and an elder brother of Robert Scott, and  to them they told their story (Contributor, vol. 5:25).

 

On the 27th day of March, 1844, Abiathar B. Williams and M. G. Eaton, each made  affidavit before Daniel H. Wells, justice of the peace, confirming the story of  these young men, and implicating Chauncy L. Higbee, Robert D. Foster, Joseph H.  Jackson and Wilson and William Law, as the leaders among the plotters. Shortly  afterwards (April 18, 1844) the two Laws and Robert D. Foster, were  excommunicated from the Church. Others prominent in this conspiracy were Austin  Cowles, Francis M. Higbee, Charles Ivins and Charles A. Foster.

 

Apostates Attempt to Organize a Church

 

An attempt was made by these apostates to organize a church of their own,  patterned after the Church of Christ, with William Law at the head. Their  following was small and the attempt was a failure. They soon joined hands openly  with the most bitter enemies of the Saints and aided them in all their  anti-“Mormon” persecutions. They advocated the repeal of the Nauvoo Charter;  insulted the officers of the city and maliciously violated the ordinances,  endeavoring to bring the city into ill-repute. Their evil deeds they laid at the  door of others, and with lying tongues made brutal accusations against the  innocent, and openly threatened the life of the Prophet.

 

Plot to Kill Joseph Smith

 

May 25, 1844, William Law, Robert D. Foster and Joseph H. Jackson, had Joseph  Smith indicted at Carthage on the charge of polygamy and perjury. Two days later  Joseph left for Carthage, accompanied by a number of his friends, and  voluntarily gave himself up for trial. He secured legal assistance and  endeavored to have his case tried, but the opposition insisted on the case going  over until the next term of court. On the way to Carthage, Charles A. Foster  overtook the Prophet and his company, and had some conversation. When they  reached their destination Foster called Joseph Smith aside and informed him of a  conspiracy against his life. His brother Robert D., with tears in his eyes, also  said there were persons there who had planned to kill the Prophet before he left  that town. The spark of repentance kindled in their breasts, however, soon died  out, and these two men again banded with the conspirators in Nauvoo, to bring  to pass the death of Joseph and Hyrum Smith.

 

The “Nauvoo Expositor”

 

To better advance their malicious course, the conspirators of Nauvoo procured a  press and proposed the publishing of a paper to be called the Nauvoo Expositor.  The object of the paper, as set forth in the prospectus was, to advocate “the  unconditional repeal of the Nauvoo City Charter, to restrain and correct the  abuses of the unit power , to ward off the iron rod which is held over the  devoted heads of the citizens of Nauvoo . . . to advocate an  unmitigated  disobedience to political revelations, and to censure and decry gross moral  imperfections wherever found, either in plebeian, patrician or self-constituted  Monarch to advocate the pure principles of morality.” In plain words to attack  the Church and destroy the protection of the Saints guaranteed by the Charter of  Nauvoo.

 

The first and only number of the  Expositor appeared June 7, 1844, filled with  vile and malicious slanders against the Prophet and the leading citizens of  Nauvoo. In attacking the charter, these wicked conspirators knew they were  taking a course which would gain them the sympathy and aid of all the enemies of  the Church, as nothing else could do. The charter, with its liberal provisions,  had aroused the hatred of anti-“Mormons” because it prevented their sinister and  diabolical designs. These same evil actors had lived under the charter from the  beginning, and had been loud in its praise and defense, until Satan entered  their hearts and their minds became darkened. They knew that the Latter-day  Saints, without the charter would be a prey to their enemies, and at the mercy  of their apostate persecutors, the small minority of the population, who could  wreak vengeance upon their former brethren without restraint.

 

The circulation of the first number of this paper filled the hearts of the  people with righteous indignation. Their liberty was attacked, their lives  threatened, and the prospect, from the circulation of falsehoods within their  city, and bitter hatred without, was another expulsion from their homes. Were  they to submit peaceably to such attacks?

 

The Expositor Declared a Nuisance

 

At a meeting of the city council held June 10, after full consideration, the  Expositor was declared a public nuisance and was ordered to be abated. The city  marshal John P. Greene was instructed to proceed to the printing office and  carry out the order of the council. Taking with him a few men he proceeded to  inform the proprietors of his mission and demanded entrance into the building  which was denied. With little effort he opened the door, pied the type, carried  out the press and burned the printed papers that were found. He then reported  to the mayor who immediately forwarded an account of the proceeding to the  governor of Illinois.

 

In a rage the conspirators set fire to the building and hastened to Carthage,  stating that their lives were in danger and they had been driven from their  homes. The fire was discovered and extinguished before any damage had been done,  but the falsehoods circulated aroused the people of Carthage and other towns.  Indignation meetings were held and mobs began to gather under arms.

 

Notes

 

1.  Such a canal was built, and completed in 1877, at a cost to the government  of more than four million dollars.

 

2.  It was later discovered that William Law was in league with the Missourians.

 

 Chapter 35 The Martyrdom. 1844

 

Charge of Francis M. Higbee

 

June 11, 1844, Francis M. Higbee made complaint before Thomas Morrison, a  justice of the peace at Carthage, charging Joseph Smith and the members of the  Nauvoo city council with riot committed in destroying the press of the  Expositor. The warrant was served by Constable David Bettisworth the following  day. It required that the accused should go before the justice issuing the  warrant, “or some other justice of the peace, for trial.” The Prophet expressed  his willingness to go before some other justice, as he had lawful right to do,  but was not willing to be taken to Carthage to be tried before his mobocratic  enemies. Bettisworth, in anger, declared that he would take him to Carthage. His  attention was called to the nature of the warrant and that his actions were  contrary to law, and with righteous indignation Joseph Smith obtained a writ of  habeas corpus and was legally tried before the municipal court of Nauvoo and  discharged. Each of the members of the city council did the same, and were  likewise discharged.

 

Anger of the Mob

 

When Bettisworth returned to Carthage without his prisoners, the disappointment  of the mobocrats was intense, and they threatened to go against Nauvoo in force.  Indignation meetings were held in Warsaw and Carthage, and inflammatory speeches  were made against the Saints. The assembled mobbers in each place adopted  resolutions in which they said, “We hold ourselves at all times in readiness to  co-operate with our fellow-citizens in this state, Missouri and Iowa, to  exterminate, utterly exterminate, the wicked and abominable ‘Mormon’ leaders,  the authors of our troubles.” All members of the Church, or sympathizers with  Joseph Smith, were warned to leave these townships on pain of instant  vengeance. A deputation was sent by them to the governor, stating that Joseph  Smith and others had refused to obey the mandate of the writ, and with other  falsehoods they attempted to prejudice him in their favor. The minutes of these  unlawful and wicked proceedings were published in the Warsaw Signal and other  papers of the state.

 

The Saints Threatened

 

The Saints also sent messengers to the governor with full and correct accounts  of the proceedings at Nauvoo, and asking for protection. In the meantime,  without waiting for the governor’s reply, the mob forces commenced their brutal  attacks upon the Saints residing outside of Nauvoo, threatening them with  destruction unless they immediately accepted one of the following propositions:  Deny Joseph Smith as a Prophet of God and join the mob in securing his arrest;  gather up their effects and move to Nauvoo; or give up their arms and remain  quiet until the affair was over. Runners were dispatched to Missouri for aid  from the mobbers there, and the whole country was inflamed by the spread of  diabolical falsehoods.

 

Advice of Judge Thomas

 

The Prophet did everything in his power to allay excitement and kept the  governor posted with numerous affidavits and documents regarding the state of  affairs. Judge Jesse B. Thomas, of the circuit court, advised the Prophet to go  before some justice of the peace in the county and have an examination on the  writ issued by Morrison, which action would take away all excuse of the mob, and  then he could take steps to have them bound to keep the peace. For his pains,  Judge Thomas was threatened by the mob with a coat of tar and feathers. The  Prophet accepted his advice and was tried before Justice Daniel H. Wells, a  non-“Mormon,” and after a full investigation was discharged. His enemies knew that this trial was lawful, as the previous one had been; but they were  determined not to be thwarted in their wicked purpose. They thirsted for the blood of the Prophet and were determined to drag him to Carthage, with or  without process of law, there to slay him. A mass meeting was held in Nauvoo, pacific resolutions were adopted, and messengers chosen to go forth in the  surrounding country to declare the truth and allay excitement; but the prejudice  was too great and little was accomplished.

 

Nauvoo Under Martial Law

 

Because of threats of mob vengeance from both Missouri and Illinois information  was sent to President Tyler of the United States, acquainting him with the  danger and asking for protection. Nauvoo was placed under martial law, and the  legion mustered into service in self-defense. The Prophet stood before them in  his uniform as lieutenant-general and addressed them at length, in defense of  their liberties. In the course of his remarks he said:

 

“It is thought by some that our enemies would be satisfied by my destruction,  but I tell you as soon as they have shed my blood, they will thirst for the  blood of every man in whose heart dwells a single spark of the spirit of the  fulness of the Gospel. The opposition of these men is moved by the spirit of the  adversary of all righteousness. It is not only to destroy me, but every man and  woman who dares believe the doctrines that God hath inspired me to teach to this  generation.”

 

Appeal to the Governor for Protection

 

On June 16, Joseph wrote Governor Ford, calling his attention to the mob  meetings at Carthage and Warsaw, and the threats made to exterminate the Saints.  He requested the governor to come to Nauvoo to make further investigation, and  to quell insurrection. Instead of going to Nauvoo, Governor Ford went to  Carthage, and sent word to Nauvoo that he was there in the interest of peace,  and asked that well-informed and discreet persons be sent to him. Elders John  Taylor and Dr. John M. Bernhisel were immediately sent to Carthage; but to their  surprise and disappointment they found the governor surrounded by some of the  worst element in Illinois. The Laws, Fosters and Higbees, with Joseph H.  Jackson, an adventurer and murderer, the publishers of the Expositor, had his  ear. Elders Taylor and Bernhisel could not get an interview with the governor  except in the presence of these vicious enemies who had pledged themselves to  bring to pass the death of Joseph and Hyrum Smith. As they told their side of  the story they were constantly interrupted by this rabble with, “that’s a      lie,” and other unseemly epithets of like character. The governor treated them  very rudely, showing that he was under the influence of the mob. He stated that  Joseph Smith and the members of the city council should come to Carthage to be  tried on the original writ as nothing short of that would satisfy the people.  When the messengers protested because of the murderous spirit of the mob, the  governor strenuously advised that they come without arms and pledged his faith  that they should be protected. He also sent a written communication to Joseph  Smith, in which he said the city council, in destroying the Expositor press, had  committed a gross outrage upon the laws and liberty of the people. He ignored  the trial before the municipal court and also that before Daniel H. Wells,  justice of the peace, demanding that all who were accused should submit  themselves “to be arrested by the same constable, by virtue of the same warrant,  and be tried before the same magistrate whose authority has heretofore been  resisted. Nothing short of this can vindicate the dignity of violated law and  allay the just excitement of the people.” Governor Ford must have blushed with  shame when he penned these lines, for he knew he was violating his oath of  office and declaring an untruth, for the sake of finding favor with the mob. If  his demand was not complied with he threatened to come with sufficient force to  execute his order. “You know the excitement of the public mind,” he said. “Do  not tempt it too far. A very little matter may do a very great injury; and if  you are disposed to continue the causes of excitement and render a force  necessary to coerce submission, I would say that your city was built, as it  were, upon a keg of powder which a very little spark may explode.”  “And I  will,” he continued, “also guarantee the safety of all such persons as may thus  be brought to this place from Nauvoo either for trial or as witnesses for the  accused.”

 

The same day (June 22) the Prophet respectfully replied to this cravenly penned  communication, defending his course and denying the false accusations contained  in the governor’s letter. He called attention to the promises made in Missouri,  but when witnesses came they were cast into prison, and since “a burnt child  dreads the fire,” they were not to be blamed if they refused to place themselves  in the hands of a blood-thirsty mob openly making threats to take their lives.  The Prophet expressed a willingness to go before any other justice in the state,  except at Carthage, or before the circuit court, but did not feel legally bound  to go to Carthage to be butchered.

 

The governor’s letter to Joseph Smith caused no small surprise among the Saints.  It was evident that they could not look to him for help, for he had joined  himself entirely with their enemies. He had ignored the law; refused to  recognize the legality of the courts, and the right of a fair and impartial  trial before an unprejudiced judge and jury.

 

Hyrum Refuses to Leave his Brother

 

So serious had the matter become that a letter was sent to President Brigham  Young and the apostles who were in the mission field, instructing them to return  to Nauvoo at once. The Prophet had previously (June 20) advised his brother  Hyrum to take his family and go at once by steamboat to Cincinnati. Hyrum  replied: “Joseph, I can’t leave you,” whereupon Joseph remarked to his brethren,  “I wish I could get Hyrum out of the way, so that he may live to avenge my  blood, and I will stay with you and see it out.”

 

The Proposed Journey to the West

 

In the afternoon of June 22, Joseph was in consultation with Hyrum Smith, John  Taylor, Willard Richards and Dr. John M. Bernhisel, when it was decided that he  should go to Washington and lay the whole difficulty before President Tyler. At  dusk another consultation was held, when the Prophet called these same brethren  and William W. Phelps, Abraham C. Hodge, John L. Butler, Alpheus Cutler and  William Marks, to his office in his upper room. The governor’s letter was read  and the Prophet said, “There is no mercy no mercy here.” Hyrum said, “No; just  as sure as we fall into their hands we are dead men.” Joseph replied, “Yes: what  shall we do, Brother Hyrum?” Hyrum replied, “I don’t know.” All at once the  Prophet’s countenance brightened up and he said, “The way is open. It is clear  to my mind what to do. All they want is Hyrum and myself; then tell everybody to  go about their business, and not to collect in groups, but to scatter about.  There is no doubt they will come here and search for us. Let them search; they  will not harm you in person or property, and not even a hair of your head. We  will cross the river tonight, and go away to the West.” On this date Joseph  wrote: “I told Stephen Markham that if Hyrum and I were ever taken again we  should be massacred, or I was not a prophet of God. I want Hyrum to live to  avenge my blood, but he is determined not to leave me.”

 

Between nine and ten o’clock Hyrum Smith came out of the Mansion House and gave  his hand to Reynolds Cahoon, saying, “A company of men are seeking to kill my  brother Joseph, and the Lord has warned him to flee to the Rocky Mountains to  save his life. Good-bye, Brother Cahoon, we shall see you again.” A few minutes  later, as Joseph, Hyrum and Willard Richards were waiting on the river bank,  William W. Phelps was instructed to take the families of the Prophet and  Patriarch to Cincinnati. About midnight the three brethren were rowed across the  river by Orrin P. Rockwell, who returned with instructions to obtain horses and  pass them over the river the next night secretly, and be ready to start for the  Great Basin in the Rocky Mountains.

 

The Governor’s Threat

 

At ten o’clock on the morning of the 23rd the governor’s posse arrived in Nauvoo  to arrest the Prophet, but not finding him they returned, leaving one of their  number to watch for him. This posse said that if Joseph and Hyrum Smith were not  given up the governor was determined to send his troops into the city and guard  it until they were found, if it took three years.

 

Joseph Smith Accused of Cowardice

 

At one p.m. Emma Smith sent Orrin P. Rockwell to entreat the Prophet to come  back. Reynolds Cahoon accompanied him with a letter to the same effect. Reynolds  Cahoon, Lorenzo D. Wasson and Hiram Kimball accused Joseph of cowardice for  wishing to leave the people, saying that their property would be destroyed, and  they would be left without house or home. Like the fable, when the wolves came  the shepherd ran from the flock.

 

The Return to Nauvoo

 

The persecutions of enemies were easy to bear, but when he was thus accused by  those who should have been his dearest friends, the Prophet was stung to the  quick. It was not for himself he sought safety, but for his people. If this was  all they cared, he would not seek to save himself. He replied: “If my life is of  no value to my friends, it is of none to myself.” Turning to Rockwell he said,  “What shall I do?” Rockwell answered: “You are the oldest and ought to know  best; and as you make your bed, I will lie with you.” Joseph then turned to  Hyrum and said: “Brother Hyrum, you are the oldest, what shall we do?” Hyrum  said, “Let us go back and give ourselves up, and see the thing out.” The Prophet  remained in deep reflection for some time, and then remarked: “If you go back I  will go with you, but we shall be butchered.” Hyrum said, “No, no; let us go  back and put our trust in God, and we shall not be harmed. The Lord is in it.  If we live or have to die, we will be reconciled to our fate.”

 

They then returned, and the first thing the Prophet did was to notify Governor  Ford, by the hands of Theodore Turley and Jedediah M. Grant, that he would be  ready to go to Carthage on the morrow. The governor promised to send a posse to  protect him on the way, but through the influence of the Nauvoo conspirators, he  changed his mind and ordered the Prophet and Patriarch to come to Carthage  without escort.

 

The Start for Carthage

 

Early on the morning of the 24th of June, Joseph and Hyrum with the accused  members of the city council and a few tried friends, left Nauvoo for Carthage.  On the way the Prophet hesitated, and looked back with admiration upon the city,  the temple, and his farm. “This is the loveliest place, and the best people  under the heavens,” he said; “little do they know the trials that await them!”  They passed the home of Esq. Daniel H. Wells, who was unwell. The Prophet  stopped and called on him, and as he parted, he said: “Squire Wells, I wish you  to cherish my memory, and not think me the worst man in the world either.”

 

The Governor’s Demand for Arms

 

About four miles from Carthage, they met Captain Dunn with a company of about  sixty mounted militia, who presented the Prophet with an order from the governor  for delivery of all the state arms in possession of the Nauvoo Legion, which  Joseph promptly countersigned. It was not enough for the governor to demand the  presence of the Prophet and Patriarch at Carthage to be murdered, but the people  in Nauvoo were to be left defenseless against their enemies. This order for the  delivery of the state arms was evidently intended to exasperate the Saints to  commit some overt act, which might be construed as treason. Fearing that the  inhabitants of Nauvoo would show resistance, Captain Dunn requested that the  whole company return with him to Nauvoo, and pledged to protect them even with  his life. A messenger was sent to the governor explaining the reason for the  return to Nauvoo. Notwithstanding the many threats, which the governor  constantly had heard against the lives of Joseph and Hyrum Smith, no action was  taken to disarm the mob, who were mustered into the governor’s service. It  appeared very much like a repetition of the Missouri scenes, in making the  Saints defenseless while in a peaceful attitude, and arming their murderous  enemies with state arms.

 

A Lamb to the Slaughter

 

When the company met Captain Dunn, the Prophet said:

 

 “I am going like a lamb to the slaughter, but I am as calm as a summer’s  morning. I have a conscience void of offense toward God and toward all men. If  they take my life I shall die an innocent man, and my blood shall cry from the  ground for vengeance, and it shall be said of me, ‘He was murdered in cold  blood!’”

 

When the work of Captain Dunn was accomplished, he thanked the people for their  peaceful compliance and promised them protection. Late that afternoon the  journey to Carthage was commenced again. It was midnight when the company  arrived at that town, and while passing the public square many of the troops of  the Carthage Greys made murderous threats. “Stand away, you McDonough boys,”  they yelled, “and let us shoot the damned ‘Mormons’” “   you, old Joe, we’ve got  you now. Clear the way and let us have a view of Joe Smith, the prophet of God.  He has seen the last of Nauvoo. We’ll use him up now, and kill all the damned  Mormons.”

 

Governor Ford’s Promise to the Mob-Militia

 

On hearing these threats Governor Ford put his head out of a window and said, “I  know your great anxiety to see Mr. Smith, which is natural enough, but it is  quite too late tonight for you to have the opportunity; but I assure you,  gentlemen, you shall have that privilege tomorrow morning, as I will cause him  to pass before the troops upon the square, and I now wish you, with this  assurance, quietly and peaceably to return to your quarters.” With a faint  “Hurrah for Tom Ford,” they complied with his wish.

 

The Charge of Treason

 

Early on the morning of the 25th the prisoners voluntarily surrendered  themselves to Constable Bettisworth. Shortly afterwards Joseph and Hyrum were  again arrested by Bettisworth on the charge of “treason” against the state of  Illinois, on complaint of Augustine Spencer and Henry O. Norton.

 

The Governor’s Inflammatory Speech

 

Shortly after eight o’clock Governor Ford called all the troops together and  formed them in a hollow square. He then addressed them in a most inflammatory  manner against the Prophet Joseph and the Patriarch Hyrum Smith. They needed  little encouragement, as he well knew, for they even then were inflamed to a  murderous degree. At the close of his speech he fulfilled his promise to the  troops as they were drawn up in file, by taking Joseph and Hyrum Smith before  them, and introduced them as Generals Joseph and Hyrum Smith. The Carthage Greys  refused to receive them by such title, and made threats against their lives, to  which the governor paid little heed.

 

His Lack of Sincerity

 

When Joseph Smith reported to Governor Ford that he had been before Daniel H.  Wells, a justice of the peace, and had been tried, the governor replied that no  other justice would do to try the case but the one who had issued the writ,  therefore they must be tried before Justice Morrison. His lack of sincerity is  shown in the fact that they were now taken before Justice Robert F. Smith,  captain of the Carthage Greys and a most bitter mobocrat. The governor’s object  was to drag them to Carthage to their enemies, and there was no thought of  justice or right in making his demand. The accused brethren were bound over to  appear at the next term of the circuit court. It was evident that the magistrate  intended to place their bail at a figure which could not be met, in order to  cast them into jail, but the bond was given, and Justice Smith left the court  house without calling on the two prisoners, Joseph and Hyrum Smith, to answer to  the charge of treason.

 

False Imprisonment

 

About eight p.m. Constable Bettisworth appeared at their lodgings at the  Hamilton House and insisted on Joseph and Hyrum going to jail. They demanded to  see the copy of the mittimus, which was refused. Their counsel, Messrs. H. T.  Reid and J. W. Woods, informed the constable that they were entitled to a  hearing before a justice, whereupon the constable produced a mittimus which  falsely stated that they had been brought before Justice Robert F. Smith and the  trial had been postponed by reason of the absence of material witnesses. They  vigorously protested against such false and outrageous proceedings. Justice  Smith asked the governor for advice, since his mittimus was illegal, and  therefore this was a false committal, when Governor Ford replied, “You have the  Carthage Greys at your command!” The hint was sufficient, and  Captain Robert F.  Smith thereupon commanded his “Greys” to execute the illegal action of Justice  Robert F. Smith, and the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch Hyrum Smith were thrust  into jail in defiance of all law. Elder John Taylor protested to the governor,  but was answered by that craven individual that he had no power to interfere,  and the law must take its course.

 

The Governor’s Broken Pledge

 

On the morning of June 26, Joseph requested an interview with Governor Ford,  which had been denied him the day before. This time it was granted and the whole  cause of the trouble was reviewed. Governor Ford contemplated going to Nauvoo  the following day to investigate certain charges of counterfeiting, and the  Prophet said he considered himself unsafe in Carthage and requested to be taken  to Nauvoo. The governor gave his word of honor that he would take him when he  went, but failed to keep his promise.

 

The Illegal Summons

 

In the afternoon, Frank Worrell appeared before the jail with the Carthage Greys  and demanded that the prisoners be delivered up to the constable to be taken  before Justice R. F. Smith for trial. The jailer, who had been instructed to  keep them in custody “until discharged by due course of law,” protested such  proceedings; but by threats Worrell compelled the jailer to surrender the  prisoners. They were taken before Justice Smith, where their counsel, who had  been given no notice of a trial, asked for a continuance that they might obtain  witnesses. A continuance was granted until noon the following day. A new  mittimus was made out and the prisoners committed again to prison, and without  consultation on their part the time of trial was changed until the  twenty-ninth.

 

Threats of the Mob

 

It was common conversation on the camp ground and at the hotel, in the presence  of Governor Ford, that “The law is too short for these men, but they must not be  suffered to go at large;” and “if the law will not reach them, powder and ball  must.” Previously the governor had said, in order to quiet the impatience of the  Carthage Greys, that they should have “full satisfaction.”

 

The Night in Jail

 

The evening of the 26th of June was spent by the prisoners and a number of  friends, viz., John Taylor, Willard Richards, John S. Fullmer, Stephen Markham  and Dan Jones, in conversing on the scriptures, Hyrum Smith occupying most of  the time. They all retired to bed late, except Dr. Willard Richards who sat up  writing until his last candle burned out. The Prophet and Patriarch occupied the  bed, while the other brethren slept on a mattress on the floor. The report of a  gun caused Joseph to arise from the bed, and going over to the mattress, he lay  down on the floor between Dan Jones and John S. Fullmer. Stretching out his  right arm he said to John S. Fullmer, “Lay your head on my arm for a pillow,  Brother John.” He then conversed with Brother Fullmer on many topics and gave  expression to the presentiment he had from the beginning that he was to die. “I  would like to see my family again,” he said, and “I would to God that I could  preach to the Saints in Nauvoo once more.” After air was quiet he turned to Dan  Jones and whispered, “Are you afraid to die?” Dan said, “Has that time come,  think you? Engaged in such a cause I do not think that death would have many  terrors.” The Prophet replied, “You will yet see Wales and fulfil the mission  appointed you before you die.”

 

The Plotting by the Mob

 

Early on the morning of the 27th, John P. Greene and William W. Phelps called at  the jail, and the Prophet sent Dan Jones out to inquire what the firing of a gun  in the night near the jail was for. Frank Worrell, of the Carthage Greys, and  officer of the guard, replied, “We have had too much trouble to bring Old Joe  here to let him ever escape alive, and unless you want to die with him you had  better leave before sundown; and you are not a damned bit better than him for  taking his part. And you’ll see that I can prophesy better than Old Joe, for  neither he nor his brother, nor anyone who will remain with them will see the  sun set today.” Dan Jones reported to the Prophet who directed him to go to the  governor and tell him what had taken place. On his way he overheard an officer  making a speech, in which he said, “Our troops will be discharged this morning  in obedience to orders, and for a sham we will leave the town; but when the  governor and the McDonough troops have left for Nauvoo this afternoon, we will  return and kill these men, if we have to tear the jail down.” This was greeted  by three cheers from the troops.

 

The Governor Warned

 

Jones immediately reported to the governor what he had heard. Governor Ford  replied: “You are unnecessarily alarmed for the safety of your friends, sir, the  people are not that cruel.” Irritated by this remark, Jones urged the necessity  of placing better men to guard the jail, and he said: “The Messrs. Smith are  American citizens, and have surrendered themselves to your Excellency upon your  pledging your honor for their safety; they are also Master Masons, and as such I  demand of you protection of their lives.”

 

Governor Ford’s face turned pale, and Jones continued: “If you do not do this, I  have but one more desire, and that is, if you leave their lives in the hands of  those men to be sacrificed ”

 

“What is that, sir?” Ford asked in a hurried tone.

 

“It is,” said Jones, “that the Almighty will preserve my life to a proper time  and place, that I may testify that you have been timely warned of their danger.”

 

Jones then returned to the prison, but the guards drove him away. Going to the  hotel he witnessed the discharge of the troops, as the officer had predicted,  and shortly afterwards Governor Ford with the McDonough militia, the most  friendly to the Saints, departed for Nauvoo, leaving the Carthage Greys, the  most blood-thirsty of the troops, to guard the jail. The plot was working  admirably without a hitch in the proceedings.

 

“A Poor Wayfaring Man of Grief”

 

John S. Fullmer and Stephen Markham, who had gone forth on errands, were also  refused admittance again to the jail, while John Taylor and Willard Richards  remained with their leaders. The day passed on, the prisoners and their two  friends spent the time in bearing testimony to the truth of the Gospel, the  divinity of the Book of Mormon, and in writing to their friends. Almon W.  Babbitt called at the jail in the forenoon with a letter from Oliver Cowdery.  Shortly after three o’clock there was excitement among the guards.

 

At this hour Elder John Taylor sang the hymn “A Poor Wayfaring Man of Grief.”  When he had finished, the Prophet asked him to sing it through once more, which  he did. At four o’clock the guard was changed. At five o’clock the jailer, Mr.  Stigall, suggested that the prisoners retire to the cell below, where they would  be safer.

 

The Martyrdom

 

Shortly after five o’clock there was a rustling at the outer door of the jail  and a cry of surrender, and the discharge of three or four firearms. Dr.  Richards glanced out of the window and saw about one hundred armed men around  the door. Many of them had their faces blackened. It is said the guard elevated  their guns and boisterously threatened the mob, but took good care to fire over  their heads. The mob encircled the building and some of them rushed past the  guard up the flight of stairs, burst open the door and began their work of  death, while others fired through the windows. Joseph, Hyrum and Elder Taylor  had their coats off. The Prophet sprang for his coat to get a six barreled  pistol which Cyrus Wheelock had given him, and Hyrum reached for a single barrel  pistol that had been left by John S. Fullmer. They all then braced themselves  against the door, Elder Taylor armed with a heavy walking stick of Elder  Markham’s and Dr. Richards with Elder Taylor’s cane. In an instant a ball  whistled up the stairway, and Joseph Smith, John Taylor and Willard Richards  sprang to the left of the door, and tried to knock aside the guns of the  ruffians. Hyrum Smith retreated back and in front of the door, snapping his  pistol, when a ball struck him on the left side of the nose. He fell on his back  saying: “I am a dead man!” As he fell on the floor another ball from the outside  entered his left side, and passed through his body with such force that it  completely broke to pieces the watch he wore in his vest pocket. At the same  instant another ball grazed his breast, entered his throat, and passed into his  head, while another was fired into his leg. A shower of bullets was pouring into  the room. Joseph reached around the door casing and discharged his six shooter  into the passage, some barrels missing fire, while Elders Taylor and Richards  continued to parry the muskets which were sticking through the door. When Hyrum  fell, the Prophet said: “Oh, dear brother Hyrum!” Seeing there was no safety in  the room, and without doubt thinking to spare his other companions, he turned  calmly from the door, dropped his pistol on the floor, and sprang into the  window. Two balls pierced him from the door, and one entered his right breast  from without. He fell outward into the hands of his murderers, exclaiming: “O  Lord, my God!” With a cry that he had jumped from the window, the assassins who  were in the building rushed down the stairs. Elder Taylor was also severely  wounded; four balls piercing his body, one ball struck his watch as he attempted  to jump from the window, throwing him back into the room.

 

When the ruffians left the building, Elder Richards who had miraculously  escaped, except that a ball grazed his ear, started for the door. Elder Taylor  called to him; he returned and carried the wounded man upstairs into the  “dungeon” and stretched him on the floor. Covering him with a bed, he said:  “This is a hard case to lay you on the floor, but if your wounds are not fatal,  I want you to live to tell the story.” He then returned to the room below,  expecting the next moment to be shot.

 

Terror of the Mob

 

After accomplishing their deed of blood, terror seized the hearts of the  assassins who fled from the scene of their diabolical crime in utmost confusion.  Governor Ford, three miles out of Nauvoo, on his way to Carthage, met George D.  Grant and Constable Bettisworth hastening to Nauvoo with the news of the  martyrdom. With terror on his countenance, he carried them back to Carthage,  that they might not spread the awful tale, until he should be at a distance  beyond the vengeance which he feared. Arriving at Carthage, he advised the  citizens to flee for their lives before the infuriated “Mormons” came to burn  their town, and suiting action to his words he fled with his posse towards  Quincy. Conscience-stricken and with the blood of prophets on his hands, he did  not stop until he arrived at Augusta, eighteen miles away.

 

Sorrow of the Saints

 

In the meantime word of the horrible tragedy was sent by Dr. Willard Richards to  Nauvoo. He said he had pledged his word to the frightened citizens of Carthage,  that no violence or vengeance would be attempted by the Saints, and for the  Saints to keep the peace and be prepared for an attack from Missouri. Indeed,  there was no thought of summary vengeance by the Saints. With heads bowed down  and hearts filled with grief for the greatest sorrow in all their history had  come upon them they silently wept and prayed, leaving vengeance to Him who said,  “Vengeance is mine; I will repay!”

 

The Burial

 

The next day, June 28, 1844, the bodies of the martyred prophets were taken to  Nauvoo by Dr. Willard Richards, Samuel H. Smith and a guard of eight soldiers  sent by General Deming. On the 29th, they were interred amidst the deep mourning  of a stricken people.

 

Chapter 36 The Succession of the Twelve Apostles.  Preparation to Leave Nauvoo. 1844 through 1846

 

A Crisis in the Church

 

The martyrdom of Joseph and Hyrum Smith came as a terrible shock to the members  of the Church. The thought that the Prophet was to be taken from them had not  entered their minds, notwithstanding the many predictions he had made regarding  his approaching death. He was only in his thirty-ninth year. His constitution  was strong and he was possessed of exceptional vitality. The Lord had saved him  so many times from perils and threatened death, that the Saints fully expected  the same power to shield him always.

 

His death brought about a crisis in the Church, for it was the first  disorganization of the presiding quorum of the Priesthood. Very little thought  had been given to the subject of succession in the Presidency, even by the  leading brethren, for such a contingency seemed to them to be very remote. The  revelations were clear on that point, but there had been no occasion for  consideration of the subject. In the revelation on Priesthood, given to the  apostles in 1835 (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 107), the Lord said that the council of the  apostles was equal in authority with the First Presidency, and Joseph Smith  stated that its place was second only to the presidency of the Church, and where  there was no First Presidency, the apostles would preside. When the Saints were  left without the guiding hand of the Prophet, they were in confusion, not fully  understanding this order of the Priesthood. Sidney Rigdon, first counselor to  President Joseph Smith, had lost the spirit of the work. Contrary to the direct  command of the Lord in a revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 124:108  through 9) he moved his  residence to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he was of little assistance as a  counselor in the presidency. For many months before his death, Joseph Smith had  suspected Sidney Rigdon of being in league with his enemies. The Prophet openly  accused Sidney of being guilty of such treacherous action, from which accusation  he was not entirely cleared. He had manifested much sympathy for John C.  Bennett, the arch-traitor, although he denied any direct communication with him.  At the October conference, 1843, the Prophet refused to sustain Sidney Rigdon as  a counselor, but through the merciful pleadings of Hyrum Smith and others, he  was sustained. On that occasion the Prophet said: “I have thrown him off my  shoulders, and you have put him on me; you may carry him, but I will not.” Amasa  M. Lyman had been chosen to act as a counselor in his stead. William Law,  Joseph’s second counselor, had been excommunicated for apostasy, and was one of  those who brought to pass the martyrdom.

 

Sidney Rigdon’s Attempt to be “Guardian to the Church”

 

Most of the apostles were in the Eastern States on missions at the time of the  martyrdom. Only two were at Nauvoo, and one of them seriously wounded. As soon  as Sidney Rigdon heard of the death of Joseph and Hyrum Smith, he hastened to  Nauvoo, where he arrived Saturday, August 3, 1844. Elders Parley P. Pratt and  George A. Smith had arrived a few days before. The apostles invited Sidney  Rigdon to meet with them the following morning, at eight o’clock at the home of  John Taylor, where they might discuss the affairs of the Church, which Sidney  Rigdon promised to do. Instead of doing so he met with William Marks and a few  others, and endeavored to lay plans for the appointment of a trustee-in-trust  and a “guardian” for the Church, before others of the apostles could arrive. At  ten o’clock a public meeting was held and Sidney Rigdon preached declaring that  a “guardian” must be appointed, “to build up the Church unto Joseph,” and  stating that he, Sidney, was the identical man spoken of by the ancient prophets  to do the work they had spoken of in prophecy. Another meeting was held in the  afternoon, at which Elder William Marks, president of the Nauvoo Stake,  announced that there would be a special meeting of the Church on Thursday,  August 8th, “for the purpose of choosing a guardian.” Sidney Rigdon had  requested that the meeting be held on the 6th, but William Marks announced it  for the 8th, which was providential, for President Brigham Young and most of the  other apostles arrived in Nauvoo on the evening of the 6th. The next morning the  apostles held a council meeting at the home of Elder Taylor. At four o’clock the  apostles met with the high council of Nauvoo and the high priests. Sidney Rigdon  was invited to express his views. He spoke at some length, relating a vision he  claimed to have had, and stating that there could be no successor to Joseph  Smith, but that the Church must be built up to him. He, Sidney, had been called  to be a spokesman to Joseph Smith, and he proposed to be a guardian to the  Church, if the people would receive him.

 

President Young’s Remarks

 

President Brigham Young said he did not care who presided over the Church, but  one thing he would have to know and that was what the Lord said about it.  “Joseph conferred upon our heads,” he said, “all the keys and powers belonging  to the apostleship which he himself held before he was taken away, and no man or  set of men can get between Joseph and the twelve in this world or in the world  to come. How often has Joseph said to the twelve: ‘I have laid the foundation  and you must build thereon, for upon your shoulders the kingdom rests.’”

 

The Special Meeting of Thursday, the 8th of August

 

Thursday, August 8, 1844, the special meeting called by William Marks in behalf  of Sidney Rigdon was held at 10 o’clock. Sidney Rigdon, from a position in a  wagon in front of the stand in the grove, addressed the vast assembly for about  one hour and a half. He presented himself to them as a “guardian” for the  Church, that it might be built up unto Joseph Smith. The longer he talked, the  more the people were convinced that he was without the inspiration of the Lord,  and they left the meeting feeling that his was not the voice of the true  shepherd.

 

Transfiguration of Brigham Young

 

At the close of the morning meeting, President Brigham Young, made a few remarks  and announced that there would be another meeting at 2 o’clock. At the appointed  time a great multitude of Saints assembled. The various quorums of the  Priesthood were arranged in order before the stand, and after the opening  exercises President Brigham Young addressed the congregation. He spoke with  great power and the people were convinced that the authority and power of  presidency was with the apostles. When he first arose to speak the people were  greatly astonished, for President Young stood transfigured before them and they  beheld the Prophet Joseph Smith and heard his voice as naturally as ever they  did when he was living. It was a manifestation to the Saints that they might  recognize the correct authority. Following his remarks in the afternoon, Amasa  M. Lyman, William W. Phelps and Parley P. Pratt each spoke endorsing the remarks  of President Young.

 

The Apostles are Sustained

 

After the other brethren had spoken President Young arose and was about to put  the question to the assembly whether or not they wanted Sidney Rigdon for a  leader and to be a “guardian” for the Church, but at the request of Elder Rigdon  the question of supporting the apostles as the presiding quorum of the Church  was presented first by President Young as follows:

 

 “I will ask you as quorums: Do you want Brother Rigdon to stand forward as your  leader, your guide, your spokesman? President Rigdon wants me to bring up the  other question first, and that is: Does the Church want, and is it their only  desire to sustain the twelve as the First Presidency of this people?

 

“Here are the apostles, the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and  Covenants they are written on the tablet of my heart. If the Church want the  twelve to stand as the head, the First Presidency of the Church, and at the head  of this kingdom in all the world, stand next to Joseph, walk up into their  calling, and hold the keys of this kingdom, every man, every woman, every quorum  is now put in order, and you are now the sole controllers of it.

 

“All that are in favor of this, in all the congregation of the Saints manifest  it by holding up the right hand.”

 

There was a universal vote, after which President Young called for the negative  as follows:

 

 “If there are any of the contrary mind, every man and every woman who does not  want the twelve to preside, lift up your hands in like manner.”

 

There were no hands raised, and President Young then remarked that since the  vote was unanimous it superseded the other question of presenting Sidney Rigdon  as “guardian” and also trying the vote by quorums. In this manner the apostles,  who were the rightful authorities according to the revelations of the Lord, were  sustained by the vote of the people and by common consent, as the Lord had  commanded that all things should be done. The matter of succession was properly  and rightfully decided, and was now binding on the members of the Church. At the  close of the services the Saints returned to their homes, their minds at rest,  for they were, with very few exceptions, no longer in doubt regarding the  authority of the Priesthood and the presidency of the Church.

 

Excommunication of Sidney Rigdon

 

Manifesting a bitter spirit and great disappointment, Sidney Rigdon returned to  Pittsburgh. However, before he left Nauvoo he gave expression to his feelings  declaring that the Church had not been led by the Spirit of the Lord for a long  time, and he refused to sustain the apostles in their calling. A charge was made  against him and his case was presented before the high council, with Bishop  Newel K. Whitney presiding. After a lengthy hearing he was cut off the Church by  the unanimous vote of the council. His case was then presented to the  congregation of the Saints, and they sustained the action of the high council,  only ten persons voting in the negative. After his return to Pittsburgh, he  organized a church with officers after the order of the Church of Jesus Christ.  He published a paper and prophesied that all who followed the apostles would go  with them to destruction. He gathered around him a few of the disaffected  spirits from Nauvoo, but his organization did not prosper and soon came to an  end.

 

Action Against William Marks

 

At the October conference, 1844, the apostles were again sustained as the  presiding quorum of the Church by a united vote of the members. When the name of  William Marks, president of the Nauvoo Stake, was presented, objection was  raised and he was rejected, only two persons voting to sustain him. He had  favored the claim of Sidney Rigdon, although he supported the apostles, but his  spirit was no longer in the work and he was found in rebellion. He later left  the Church and followed James J. Strang1 and others, and was excommunicated.

 

Trial of the Murderers of Joseph and Hyrum Smith

 

In October, 1844, a grand jury selected by the Hancock County circuit court,  brought into court two bills of indictment against nine individuals for the  murder of Joseph and Hyrum Smith. The trial took place in May, 1845, but proved  to be nothing but a farce. The sentiment throughout the country was so bitter  against the Saints that no attempt was made to obtain justice, which the  governor had faithfully promised them. The jurors were instructed by the court  to bring in a verdict of “not guilty,” which was accordingly done. Yet every man  in the place, including the court and jury, knew that the defendants were among  those who committed the murder. The blood of the martyrs was left unavenged to  cry from the ground against their enemies, and with the blood of all the  martyrs, shall continue to cry until the Son of Man shall come “red in his  apparel” to take vengeance upon the ungodly.

 

Growth of the Work

 

After the question of the presiding quorum was decided, the Saints settled down  to their usual duties, and the progress of the Church continued with greater  strides than ever before. At the October conference in 1844, a great deal of  important business was transacted. At that time and subsequently many brethren  were ordained to the ministry, a number of quorums of seventy were organized,  and missionaries were called to go to various parts of the United States and  abroad with the message of salvation. The building of the temple was continued  with renewed diligence, and prosperity was manifest in the settlements of the  Saints. On the 6th of December 1844, the last of the thirty capitals on the  temple was erected, and the following April, the capstone was laid amidst solemn  and enthusiastic services. Each room was dedicated separately as it was  finished, and ordinance work for the Saints, as well as baptisms for the dead,  were performed.

 

Mob Activities Renewed

 

The enemies of the Latter-day Saints thought that the murder of Joseph and Hyrum  Smith would be the end of “Mormonism.” They rejoiced in the accomplishment of  their frightful deed of blood, and boasted of the downfall of the Church. To  their great surprise the blood of the martyrs was the seed of the Church. The  object they hoped to gain was not attained; therefore their anger was rekindled  against the Church. Other leaders had arisen and the progress of the work was  steady and onward. Those who had caused the death of the Prophet and the  Patriarch now turned their attention to the destruction of the entire “Mormon”  people. Through their papers, the Warsaw Signal, Alton Telegraph, Quincy Whig   and others, they circulated all manner of false reports. They accused the Saints  of theft and every other abominable crime in order to stir up the populace  against them. Schemes were launched to provoke the “Mormons” to commit some  overt act, that it might be seized upon as a pretext to gain the aid of the  officials of the state under color of law; yet by the anti-“Mormons” the laws  were constantly broken without restraint. Their malicious and murderous threats  passed unnoticed so far as any check upon such actions was concerned.

 

Attitude of Governor Ford

 

During all the trouble Governor Thomas Ford went out of his way to inform the  Saints that they were bitterly hated, and that the great majority of the  citizens of the state rejoiced in the death of Joseph and Hyrum Smith.  Notwithstanding his bitterness, he made an investigation of the charges  circulated against the Saints and reported that

 

 “On my late visit to Hancock County I was informed by some of their (the  ‘Mormons’) violent enemies, that their larcenies had become unusually numerous  and insufferable. They indeed admitted that but little had been done in this way  in their immediate vicinity. But they insisted that sixteen horses had been  stolen by the Mormons in one night, near Lima, in the County of Adams. At the  close of the expedition, I called at this same town of Lima, and upon inquiry,  was told that no horses had been stolen in that neighborhood, but that sixteen  horses had been stolen in one night in Hancock County. This last informant being  told of the Hancock County story, again changed the venue to another distant  settlement in the northern edge of Adams County.”

 

In his message to the legislature he said in reference to this subject:

 

 “Justice, however, requires me to say, that I have investigated the charge of  promiscuous stealing, and find it to be greatly exaggerated. I could not  ascertain that there were a greater proportion of thieves in that community,  than in any other of the same number of inhabitants; and perhaps if the city of  Nauvoo were compared with St. Louis, or any other western city, the proportion  would not be so great.”

 

The leaven of opposition, however, was at work, and the citizens were aroused.  Nothing but the departure of the “Mormon” people from the state would satisfy  their unjust and iniquitous demands. They appealed to the governor to aid them  in expelling the people who had done nothing to provoke opposition, but who were  unpopular because of their faith. While the governor informed them he could take  no legal action warranting such expulsion, yet he privately advised the Saints  to depart peaceably towards the West, as the Prophet Joseph Smith had  contemplated doing, and there, said he, they could set up an independent  government of their own. So lacking was he in the disposition to enforce the law  and protect the innocent, that the enemies of the Church were encouraged in  their unlawful course.

 

Repeal of the Nauvoo Charter

 

The city charter of Nauvoo had proved a protection to the Saints, and guaranteed  safety against the plottings of the wicked. It was the aim of the Nauvoo  conspirators to cause its repeal. The first attempt to do this, as we have  learned, failed. Now, however, the opposition had become so strong that the  enemies of the Latter-day Saints accomplished their purpose. The charter was  repealed by the legislature in January, 1845. Some of the murderers of Joseph  and Hyrum Smith sat in that body and violently denounced the “Mormons,” although  it was well known that their hands were stained with innocent blood. After the  repeal of the charter, and without hope of protection from the officers of the  state, the Saints were at the mercy of their enemies. The prediction of the  Prophet Joseph that after they had shed his blood they would seek the lives of  every soul in whom was found the testimony of the Gospel, was literally  fulfilled. The plots of the wicked were now turned against President Brigham  Young and the leading brethren, who were forced to go into hiding from time to  time.

 

Attacks Upon the Saints

 

In September, 1845, the scattered families of Saints were sorely persecuted.  Many were driven from their homes, which were burned. Sheriff J. B. Backenstos  endeavored to perform his duty, and took a determined stand against mob law. For  his pains he was arrested on the charge of murder, as a mobber had been killed,  but violence against the “Mormons” was permitted to go unchecked. Governor Ford  had promised and pledged his word, that the murderers of the Prophet and  Patriarch should be brought to justice. When he appealed to the citizens of  Warsaw to sustain him in this pledge, they positively informed him that they  would do nothing of the kind. Similar answers were given by other citizens, who  not only took a stand in opposition to the trial of the murderers, but brazenly  appealed to the governor to give his aid in expelling the “Mormons” from the  state. That weak and pusillanimous individual, by his subsequent actions,  acknowledged his defeat and the abdication of government in Illinois.

 

The Quincy Mass Meeting

 

September 22, 1845, a mass meeting was held in Quincy to take action against the  Saints. Their removal from Illinois was advocated. Those who assembled fully  understood that the Prophet Joseph Smith had contemplated a removal to the West,  and that plans were on foot early in 1844 to send an exploring expedition out to  locate a site for a new home in the Rocky Mountains. A committee was appointed  by this mass meeting to wait upon the authorities of the Church and ascertain  their intentions regarding a removal from the state of Illinois, and to impress  upon the brethren that such a move was determined upon by the citizens.  Following the meeting the Quincy Whig made this statement in this boasted land  of liberty:

 

 “It is a settled thing that the public sentiment of the State is against the  ‘Mormons,’ and it will be in vain for them to contend against it; and to prevent  bloodshed, and the sacrifice of many lives on both sides, it is their duty to  obey the public will and leave the State as speedily as possible. That they will  do this we have a confident hope and that too, before the next extreme is  resorted to  that of force.”

 

The Reply of the Saints

 

The committee appointed waited upon President Brigham Young and the apostles,  and acquainted them with the action of the mass meeting and desired a reply. On  the 24th, the reply was given in a written communication. The persecutions of  the Saints were mentioned and the statement made that the “Mormons” had  endeavored to live in peace and desired to do so with all men. In relation to  their removal they answered as follows:

 

 “We would say to the committee above mentioned and to the Governor, and all the  authorities, and people of Illinois, and the surrounding states and territories,  that we propose to leave this country next spring, for some point so remote that  there will not need to be any difficulty with the people and ourselves, provided  certain propositions necessary for the accomplishment of our removal shall be  observed, as follows, to wit:

 

“That the citizens of this and surrounding counties, and all men, will use their  influence and exertion to help us to sell or rent our properties, so as to get  means enough that we can help the widow, the fatherless and the destitute to  remove with us.

 

“That all men will let us alone with their vexatious lawsuits so that we may  have time, for we have broken no law; and help us to cash, dry goods, groceries,  good oxen, beef-cattle, sheep, wagons, mules, horses, harness, etc. in exchange  for our property, at a fair price, and deeds given at payment, that we may have  means to accomplish a removal without the suffering of the destitute to an  extent beyond the endurance of human nature.

 

“That all exchanges of property shall be conducted by a committee, or by  committees of both parties; so that all the business may be transacted honorably  and speedily.

 

“That we will use all lawful means, in connection with others, to preserve the  public peace while we tarry; and shall expect, decidedly, that we be no more  molested with house-burning, or any other depredations, to waste our property  and time, and hinder our business.

 

“That it is a mistaken idea, that we have proposed to remove in six months, for  that would be so early in the spring that grass might not grow nor water run;  both of which would be necessary for our removal. But we propose to use our  influence to have no more seed time and harvest among our people in this country  after gathering our present crops; and that all communications to us be made in  writing.

 

“By order of the Council,”

 

“Brigham Young,” “President.”

 

“W. Richards.” “Clerk.”

 

Decision of the Quincy Citizens

 

The Quincy citizens accepted the proposition of the Church authorities to move,  but very graciously declined to make any promise to buy or to assist in the  purchase of the abandoned property of the Saints. Why should they put themselves  out to do such a thing, when the property would naturally fall into their hands  when it was abandoned? 2

 

The Carthage Convention

 

On the 1st and 2nd of October another convention of citizens from nine counties  adjacent to Hancock, was held at Carthage. Resolutions were adopted in which the  “Mormons” were accused of depredations upon the persons and property of the  other citizens of Hancock County, and adjudged guilty, in spite of the personal  investigation of the governor, himself unfriendly to the Latter-day Saints.  Much bitterness of spirit was manifested at this meeting, which decided that it  was too late to settle any difficulties between the “Mormons” and the other  inhabitants, and only one thing would suffice and that was the removal of the  “Mormons” from the state. They declared that the “Mormons” were not being  persecuted, but were suffering for their dishonest acts; at the same time they  declared that from “long acquaintance with the old citizens of Hancock County,”  they could vouch for their “honor, integrity, and strict observance of the laws  of their country,” notwithstanding it was universally known that these same  citizens had taken part in the assassination of Joseph and Hyrum Smith by mob  force and contrary to law; moreover, that these same law-abiding citizens within  the past few weeks had driven “Mormons” from their homes and burned their houses  to the ground; had forced them from their fields where they had gone to gather  crops; had whipped their men and stolen their cattle without any protest. It  appeared that the old citizens, like the king, could do no wrong, if their  depredations were committed against the Latter-day Saints. A most regrettable  feature in connection with these troubles is the fact that O. H. Browning,  Stephen A. Douglas and others, who had defended the Prophet Joseph Smith, now  gave their influence to the mob and assisted in bringing to pass the expulsion  of the “Mormon” people from Illinois. Bitter feelings against the Saints  increased. Judges were intimidated, and even the officials of the state dared  not raise a voice in protest above a whisper, or invoke the majesty of the law.

 

Duplicity of Governor Ford

 

The anti-“Mormons” of Illinois became impatient for the removal of their enemies  before spring arrived. Their agreements were violated, and the Saints were not  permitted to dwell in peace. Vexatious lawsuits, based on falsehoods, were  planted against the apostles to embarrass them and hinder the progress of their  work. Even Governor Ford, fearing that the Saints would not leave the state  within the stipulated time, resorted to duplicity to force them from the borders  of Illinois. December 29, 1845, he wrote to Sheriff Backenstos stating that  indictments in the United States Court had been found against the leading  “Mormons” which would bring them for the first time in collision with the United  States. “If the ‘Mormons’ remain in the state,” he wrote, “a strong force will  be ordered to Nauvoo by the Secretary of War,” and he thought the government at  Washington would interfere and prevent the “Mormons” from going west of the  Rocky Mountains, as many intelligent persons believed that they would there join  the British, and “be more trouble than ever.” He thought that this consideration  was likely to influence the government. He later sent word by Sheriff Backenstos  that he had turned against the Saints and Major Warren was making calculations  to prevent their going away. In his History of Illinois, Governor Ford admitted  that he had resorted to deceit to make the “Mormons” believe that they would be  prevented from going west, in order to hasten their departure.

 

President Young’s Reply

 

Commenting on the governor’s letter to the sheriff, President Young remarked:

 

 “Should Governor Ford’s speculations and suppositions in relation to U. S.  troops prove correct, and the government send a regular force to arrest us, we  will run no risks of being murdered by them as our leaders have been; and as to  fearing a trial before the courts, it is all gammon, for our danger consists  only in being held still by the authorities while mobs massacre us, as Governor  Ford held Joseph and Hyrum Smith, while they were butchered.”

 

Loyalty to the Government

 

Answering the charge that when they got away from the borders of the United  States, the Latter-day Saints would join the forces of some other nation which  might be at war with the American Government  a thought which rightfully might  have been entertained after the treatment the “Mormon” people had received  within the borders of that land  the high council and authorities of the Church  replied:

 

 “We also further declare for the satisfaction of some who have concluded that  our grievances have alienated us from our country, that our patriotism has not  been overcome by fire, by sword, by daylight nor by midnight assassinations  which we have endured; neither have they alienated us from the institutions of  our country.

 

“Should hostilities arise between the Government of the United States and any  other power, in relation to the right of possessing the territory of Oregon, we  are on hand to sustain the claim of the United States Government to that  country. It is geographically ours, and of right; no foreign power should hold  dominion there; and if our services are required to prevent it, these services  will be cheerfully rendered according to our ability. We feel the injuries that  we have sustained, and are not insensible of the wrongs we have suffered; still  we are American.”

 

Preparations to Leave Nauvoo

 

During the fall and winter months preparations went steadily on for the removal  of the entire body of the Latter-day Saints in the spring. Work on the temple  continued with increased diligence, as if there was no thought of a removal,  until that structure was completed. January 1, 1846, the work of finishing the  assembly room for dedication was nearing completion. The general conference of  the Church was held in the building in October, 1845, according to the  commandment of the Lord through Joseph Smith in October, 1841. In December, the  ordinance work in the temple was commenced, and thereafter the building was  occupied both day and night to afford the Saints the opportunity to receive  their endowments. This continued until most all of the Saints had departed on  their westward journey. May 1, 1846, after the majority of the people had  departed from the city, the temple was publicly dedicated in the presence of  about three hundred persons.

 

In the meantime every available building in Nauvoo had been converted into a  shop where wagons, harness and other necessary articles could be manufactured  for the journey. The timber for the wagons was cut and brought to Nauvoo, where  it was prepared and boiled in salt and water or kiln dried. Teams were sent to  various parts of the country to procure iron; and blacksmiths, wheelwrights,  carpenters and other workmen were kept busy night and day. There was very little  sale of property because of the opposition of the citizens of the country, who  used their influence to discourage sales by making threats against the new  settlers as well as harassing the Saints.

 

Notes

 

1.  James J. Strang, a man of some ability and commanding presence, joined the  Church shortly before the martyrdom. After the death of the Prophet and  Patriarch he claimed to have been chosen and appointed by Joseph Smith as his  successor. He exhibited a letter which purported to have been written by the  Prophet, in which such appointment was claimed to be set forth. He gathered  quite a following of the discontented element at Nauvoo and established himself  on Beaver Island, in Lake Michigan, where later he was crowned “king.” He was  shot and killed by one of his followers, and his organization soon afterwards  crumbled to pieces. Out of its fragments some years later there arose another  organization known as the “Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day  Saints,” unto which there were gathered the majority of those who had become  disaffected and had been excommunicated from the Church.

 

 2. Dr. Conyers, in his Hancock County Mob, makes the following comment on the  action of the Quincy citizens:

 

 “The first one [resolution] in our opinion, is unique. They accepted and  recommended to the people of the surrounding counties to accept an unconditional  proposition to remove. But understand, Mr. Mormon, though we accept it and  recommend the surrounding counties to do so likewise, [reprobate you,  unconditionally] we do not intend to bring ourselves under any obligation to  purchase your property, or to furnish purchasers; but we will be very kind and  obliging, and will in no way hinder or obstruct you in your efforts to sell,  provided, nevertheless this shall not be so construed as to prevent us from  running off the purchaser. But we expect this small favor of you, viz., that you  must dispose of your property and leave at the appointed time.”

 

 Part Five The Settlement in the Rocky Mountains

 

Chapter 37 The Exodus from Nauvoo. 1846

 

The Abandonment of Nauvoo

 

Wednesday, February 4, 1846, the first of the Saints left Nauvoo and crossed the  Mississippi River on the journey to the West. 1  On the 6th of February Bishop  George Miller and a company with six wagons crossed the river, and a few days  later the work of ferrying the Saints to the Iowa side was kept up day and  night. Elder Parley P. Pratt left Nauvoo on the 14th of February, and the  following day President Brigham Young, Willard Richards and George A. Smith with  a large company of Saints crossed the Mississippi on the ice and continued their  journey about nine miles to Sugar Creek, in Lee County, where a temporary camp  was formed for the exiles fleeing from Nauvoo.2 President Young spent the 16th  in organizing the camp into companies and Elder Heber C. Kimball with another  company arrived on the 17th. On the 18th President Young and some of the  brethren returned to Nauvoo to transact some necessary business and give  instruction to those who were left there in command. Elder Joseph Young,  president of the seventies, had been left at Nauvoo to preside over the Saints  who still remained. The exiles tarried on Sugar Creek for some time where a  number of council meetings were held and the needs of the people were duly  considered.

 

At the October conference in 1845, the members of the Church, on suggestion of  President Brigham Young, unanimously covenanted as follows: “That we take all  the Saints with us, to the extent of our ability, that is, our influence and  property.” After the motion was carried, President Young remarked: “If you will  be faithful to your covenant, I will prophesy that the Great God will shower  down means upon this people to accomplish it to the very letter.” The members of  the Church had been constantly instructed to prepare for the journey by laying  up stores of provisions for many months. It was discovered that many who had  come to Sugar Creek were without supplies to last them more than a few days, and  this caused serious reflection and some anxiety among the leading brethren. It  was winter time and supplies could not readily be obtained in the wilderness.  However, those who had, shared with those who were destitute, and the Lord  blessed them in their substance.

 

Conspiracy in Washington

 

While camped on Sugar Creek a letter was received by President Young from Samuel  Brannan, in which there was presented a proposition from Amos Kendell, formerly  Postmaster-General, A. G. Benson and others, to use the Church authorities as  their tools to secure land in California. They represented to Brannan that there  was a movement on foot to disarm the Saints and prevent their movement towards  the West. However, they declared, the power was in their hands to avert the  calamity, which they would do on certain terms. Their terms were that when the  Saints arrived in California they would secure the lands and that every  alternate section should be deeded to this combination of conspirators. They  falsely represented that the President, James K. Polk, was a party to the  scheme. For their service these men promised that the Saints should be permitted  to travel to their destination without molestation, and with the protection of  the government. With righteous indignation President Young and the Apostles  refused to make reply.

 

Petition to the Governor of Iowa

 

On the 28th of February a petition was addressed to the governor of Iowa,  imploring his protection and influence in behalf of the Saints while they passed  through that territory, or remained temporarily within its borders, to raise  crops and to render assistance to those who would follow after. No reply to this  petition was received and the Saints continued without aid or interference.

 

The Journey Resumed

 

March 1, 1846, camp was broken and the journey was resumed. The weather was  extremely cold and stormy, and a great number of the people were without proper  clothing and necessary shelter. Many of the wagons were without covers, and  others had covers which would not shed the rain. Several members of the camps  died from exposure and lack of proper care. The roads were almost impassable  because of the constant storms.3  At this time there were some four hundred  wagons on the road, heavily laden and without sufficient teams to permit of  rapid travel. In this condition the exiles continued their toilsome journey over  the plains of Iowa. By the latter part of April the great body of the Latter-day  Saints had left Nauvoo and were slowly wending their way seeking a haven in the  west.

 

Organization of the Camps

 

While encamped near the Chariton River on the east fork of Shoal Creek, the  organization of the camps was reduced to a more systematic order. They were  divided into companies of hundreds, fifties and tens, with officers appointed to  preside over each. The apostles were appointed to take charge of divisions, and  the camps were divided into two grand divisions. Over one of these President  Brigham Young had command. He was also sustained as “president over all the  camps of Israel.” Elder Heber C. Kimball was appointed to the command of the  other grand division. In addition to these officers there were appointed a  contracting commissary and a distributing commissary for each fifty. The duties  of the former were to agree on terms, prices, etc., concerning the purchase of  provisions and necessities for the camp. The latter were to distribute among  the camps the grain and provisions furnished for that purpose, judiciously and  with singleness of heart. This organization led to better discipline. The  companies were more susceptible to advice and counsel, and the principle of  obedience was more fully understood. Less selfishness was manifested among the  people, and a better spirit prevailed. Of necessity the regulations in the camps  were strict, yet the freedom and rightful privileges of the Saints were safely  guaranteed. Much of the dross had been left behind, and the “fair weather  friends,” as they were called by Col. Thomas L. Kane, had forsaken the tents of  Israel and had sought the tents of ease. In this manner the camps were purged of  those who were not faithful enough to face the perils and deprivations of the  eventful journey. Although there were difficulties and differences to be settled  from time to time, President Young was led to declare that he doubted if there  had ever been a body of people, since the days of Enoch, who had done so little  grumbling under such unpleasant and trying circumstances.

 

Garden Grove

 

At the beginning of the journey about one hundred men, under command of Colonel  Stephen Markham, were selected as pioneers, to travel in advance of the  companies to build and repair the roads; also to seek out temporary places for  shelter where fields could be cultivated and homes humble though they, of  necessity, would have to be might be provided for the exiles. The advance  companies arrived at a place on the east fork of Grand River, some one hundred  and forty-five miles west of Nauvoo, April 24, 1846. Here a temporary settlement  was selected which they named Garden Grove. Two days later a council meeting was  held and three hundred and fifty-nine laboring men were reported in the camp.  From these one hundred were selected to cut trees and make rails; ten to build  fences; forty-eight to build houses; twelve to dig wells and ten to build  bridges. The remainder were employed in clearing land and preparing it for  cultivation. Every one was busy, and in a few days a respectable village, magic  like, had risen in the wilderness. A temporary organization was effected with  Samuel Bent as president, and Aaron Johnson and David Fullmer as counselors. At  this point President Young addressed the Saints saying it would be necessary to  leave some of their number here, because they could not continue the journey,  while the main body would push on and “lengthen the cords and build a few more  stakes,” and so continue on until they could all gather at the place appointed,  and “build the house of the Lord in the tops of the mountains.”

 

Proposition to Explore the West

 

It was the intention of President Young and the apostles to fit out a strong  company of able-bodied men, unencumbered with families, and send them to the  Rocky Mountains, there to build houses and plant crops, and prepare for the  coming of the people as they were able to gather from year to year. “Were  matters to be so conducted,” he said, “none would be found crying for bread or  destitute of clothing, but all would be provided for, as designed by the  Almighty. But instead of taking this course the Saints have crowded on us all  the while, and have completely tied our hands by importuning and saying, ‘Do not  leave us behind. Wherever you go, we want to go, and be with you;’ and thus our  hands and feet have been bound, which has caused our delay to the present time.  And now hundreds at Nauvoo are continually praying and importuning with the Lord  that they may overtake us, and be with us.” An estimate of what would be  required for a company of pioneers to take such a journey was made and the  project was considered, but subsequent events prevented the undertaking until  the following year.

 

Mount Pisgah

 

On the 18th of May President Young and several of the apostles reached the  middle fork of Grand River, some twenty-seven miles west of Garden Grove. Here  Parley P. Pratt with a company was found encamped. He had called the place Mount  Pisgah, and here it was decided to make another settlement for the Saints.  Several thousand acres of land were fenced for cultivation, after the manner of  the settlement at Garden Grove, and this place became a resting place for the  weary exiles for several years while crossing the plains. Elder William  Huntington was chosen to preside with Elders Ezra T. Benson and Charles C. Rich  as counselors. The camps were now traveling through an Indian country, where  there were no roads, no settlements and only Indian trails. The spring rains  having ceased, however, greater progress was made although a road had to be  prepared all the way, and bridges built over all the streams.

 

At the Missouri River

 

On the 14th of June, President Young, Heber C. Kimball, Parley P. Pratt and  others arrived on the banks of the Missouri, not far from Council Bluffs, with  their respective companies. The next day a council meeting was held and it was  decided to move back on to the bluffs where spring water could be obtained, and  they would be protected from Indians. The Pottawattamie Indians were very  friendly, and their chiefs showed the Saints some favor. A ferry boat was built  and on the 29th the companies commenced crossing the river. About this time  Elder Wilford Woodruff, who had just returned from presiding over the British  Mission, and Elder Orson Hyde, who had been laboring in Nauvoo, joined the camp.

 

President Young was still very anxious to send an exploring company to the Rocky  Mountains in advance. The camps were called together, there being about five  hundred wagons on the ground and others on the way, and President Young  addressed them advising them of his desire to get a company off for the Rocky  Mountains. He feared, he said, that something would happen to stop the movement,  and was impressed that “everything that men and hell could invent would be  hatched up to prevent the camp from making any progress.” He spoke plainly on  the subject and said if the members of the Church should be blown to the four  winds, and never gathered again, he wished them to remember that he had told  them when and where to gather, and if they failed to do so to remember and bear  him witness in the day of judgment, that they had received such information and  advice.

 

A Call From the Government

 

June 26, 1846, Captain James Allen, of the United States army, arrived at Mount  Pisgah and had an interview with the brethren there. He was the bearer of a  message to the “Mormon” people making a requisition on the camps for four or  five companies of men, to serve as volunteers in the war with Mexico, which had  recently been declared. The brethren at Mount Pisgah did not feel authorized to  take any action, and therefore advised Captain Allen to visit President Young  and the apostles at Council Bluffs. Captain Allen arrived at Council Bluffs on  the 30th day of June, and the following day met with the Church authorities and  presented his credentials for raising five hundred men. Such a demand caused  some surprise and a little dismay among the camps. However, President Brigham  Young declared that the volunteers would be forthcoming. It was moved by Heber  C. Kimball and seconded by Willard Richards, that a battalion of five hundred  men be raised, which was carried unanimously at a meeting of the brethren of the  camp who were called together to consider the requisition. Consequently  President Young and Elder Kimball returned to Mount Pisgah to raise volunteers,  while letters were sent to Garden Grove and to Nauvoo bearing on the subject.  Monday, July 13, 1846, in obedience to the call of the authorities, the camps of  the Saints met on Mosquito Creek, where they were addressed by President Young,  Captain Allen and Colonel Thomas L. Kane, who had arrived in the camp to be of  service to the people. Four companies of the battalion were raised on that and  the following day, and the fifth company a few days later.

 

An Important Council Meeting

 

July 16, a council meeting was held at the bluffs and Ezra T. Benson was  ordained an apostle in the stead of John E. Page, who had been excommunicated.  Elders Orson Hyde, Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor were appointed to go to  England to take charge of the affairs of the Church in that land and set them in  order. Reuben Hedlock and Thomas Ward, who had been in charge, had been guilty  of misconduct in the use of funds and had been disfellowshipped. The same day  four companies of the battalion were mustered into service by their respective  captains, and on the 20th left for Fort Leavenworth in the service of the United  States. The fifth company left the following day, and the entire body arrived at  their destination August 1, 1846, numbering at the time five hundred and  forty-nine men.

 

President Young’s Instructions to the Battalion

 

In giving instructions to the members of the battalion before their departure,  President Young requested that they prove themselves to be the best soldiers in  the service of the United States. He instructed the captains to be fathers to  their companies, and to manage the officers and men by the power of the  Priesthood. They should keep neat and clean; teach chastity, gentility, and  civility. No swearing should be indulged in; no man was to be insulted, and they  should avoid contentions with Missourians, or any other class of people. They  were to take their Bibles and Books of Mormon with them, but were not to impose  their belief on others. They were advised to avoid card playing and if they had  any cards with them to burn them. If they would follow the instructions given  they would not be called on to shed the blood of their fellow men, and after  their labors were over, they probably would be discharged within eight hundred  miles of the proposed settlement of the Saints in the Great Basin, where the  next temple would be built in a stronghold free from mobs.

 

Reasons for the Call for Troops

 

January 20, 1846, while the high council of Nauvoo was considering the  abandonment of that place and journeying to the Rocky Mountains, the subject of  sending an advance company was discussed. There had been some talk of the  government building block houses and forts along the road to Oregon, and the  matter was then before Congress. It was decided at this meeting that “In the  event of the President’s recommendation to build block houses and stockade forts  on the route to Oregon becoming a law, we have encouragement of having that work  to do, and under our peculiar circumstances, we can do it with less expense to  the government than any other people.” Six days later Elder Jesse C. Little was  appointed to preside in the Eastern States, and was furnished a letter of  appointment in which the following occurs:

 

 “If our government shall offer any facilities for emigrating to the western  coast, embrace those facilities, if possible. As a wise and faithful man, take  every honorable advantage of the times you can. Be thou a savior and a deliverer  of that people, and let virtue, integrity and truth be your motto salvation and  glory the prize for which you contend.”

 

Acting on this advice Elder Little wrote an appeal to President Polk in behalf  of the Latter-day Saints, and afterwards called upon him and also the  vice-President and members of the cabinet. At the time of his interview, June 1,  1846, word of the commencement of hostilities between Mexico and the United  States had reached Washington, and those governments were in a state of war. The  authorities in Washington accepted the suggestion of Elder Little, thinking it  might be opportune to call upon the “Mormons” for volunteers. This was a very  different action than that hoped for by the authorities of the Church, as they  were looking for the opportunity to labor along the road toward Oregon over  which they were destined to travel. Nevertheless they had asked for aid and now  they were determined to carry through the proposition of the government, hoping  thereby that a blessing would be obtained and some benefit accrue to them. In  complying with the order from the government over five hundred of their most  vigorous young men were taken from their camps to travel westward by another  route thus greatly weakening the camps.

 

Winter Quarters

 

The call of these able-bodied men for the battalion made it impossible for the  Saints in their weakened condition, to continue their journey towards the West.  It became necessary, therefore, for them to seek quarters where they could  prepare for the coming winter. Captain James Allen secured from the chiefs  representing the Pottawattamie tribes their voluntary consent for the Saints to  make the Indian lands an abiding place as long as they should remain in that  country. He also wrote an open letter stating what he had done in this matter.  The Indian sub-agent also endorsed the letter which Colonel Thomas L. Kane  forwarded with a communication of his own, to the President of the United  States. Measures were taken to gather to this place all the scattered Saints who  were on the plains. Twelve men were chosen to form a high council, and a site  was chosen on the west bank of the Missouri River for their settlement. A  committee of twelve men was appointed to arrange the temporary city into wards,  over which bishops were chosen to preside. During the summer hay was cut in  sufficient quantities to provide for their stock in the winter. Every family  labored diligently to construct some kind of a house in which they could find  shelter, although many of these were merely dugouts built in the side of the  hill. The place was named Winter Quarters and was laid out regularly into  streets. The Indians gave some trouble and it became necessary to build a  stockade around the town. Through kind treatment, President Young and the Saints  obtained the good will of most of the Indians, so that they lived in comparative  peace.

 

Major Harvey’s Opposition

 

Major H. M. Harvey, the superintendent of Indian affairs and some others, made  trouble for the Saints. Mr. Harvey called on President Young in November, and  stated that he wished the Saints to move from the lands belonging to the  Indians, and complained that the people were burning the Indians’ wood. He said  he had instructions from the government to permit no settlers on the lands  without authority from Washington. President Young explained that the reason for  the encampment was due to the sudden demand of the United States for troops, and  if the government prevented them from continuing their journey, some  consideration and protection in return should be offered. Later developments  indicated that the opposition was instigated by the enemies of the Saints.  Through the intercession of J. K. Kane, father of Colonel Thomas L. Kane, the  government gave permission for the exiles to remain where they were through the  winter. Colonel Kane proved himself a faithful friend to the Latter-day Saints,  and was yet to perform valiant service. He wrote to Elder Willard Richards, the  camp historian, stating that he was intending to secure a lease from the  government of the Omaha lands, on which some of the Saints had located. “Trust  me,” he said, “it is not fated that my forces shall depart before I have righted  you at the seat of government, and have at least assured to you a beginning of  justice besides an end of wrong.”

 

Activities at Winter Quarters

 

A gristmill was built at Winter Quarters; also a council house, where meetings  could be held. This was done as much for the sake of keeping the people employed  as it was for their convenience. During the winter they suffered greatly. The  scurvy broke out among them and continued until potatoes were obtained from  Missouri, and horse-radish was discovered in an abandoned fort near the camp.  Meetings were regularly held and the spiritual as well as the temporal welfare  of the refugees was not neglected. Much of the time of the leading brethren was  spent in giving employment to the Saints and in devising means for the  continuance of the journey when the time should come in the spring for them to  move.

 

Mob Uprisings at Nauvoo

 

In the summer of 1846, hostilities were renewed against the members of the  Church who still remained in Nauvoo. The great body of the Saints had left and  only a remnant remained, composed of the poor, sick and afflicted, who had been  unable to get away. They were all anxious to depart and were exerting all their  energies to obtain means for that purpose. President Young and the apostles also  were doing all in their power to aid them to depart. Notwithstanding their  straitened circumstances and their inability to move which was due mainly to mob  violence they had suffered their enemies became impatient at their delay and  continued their vicious persecution. The new citizens, who had purchased  property from the Saints, also came in for a share of the bitterness of the mob.

 

Major Warren’s Proclamation

 

Major W. B. Warren, who had been stationed in Hancock County with a small force,  took up his quarters at Nauvoo by order of the governor and published a  proclamation to the citizens of Hancock County attempting to quiet their  opposition, in which, in part, he said:

 

 “I have been in Nauvoo with my detachment a week, and can say to you with  perfect assurance, that the demonstrations made by the ‘Mormon’ population, are  unequivocal. They are leaving the state, and preparing to leave, with every  means that God and nature has placed in their hands. Five ferry boats are  running at this place night and day, and many are crossing at Nashville and Fort  Madison. This ought to be satisfactory.

 

“The anti-‘Mormons’ desire the removal of the ‘Mormons;’ this is being effected  peaceably, and with all possible dispatch. All aggressive movements, therefore,  against them at this time, must be actuated by a wanton desire to shed blood, or  to plunder. This course, I know, is deprecated by three-fourths of the  anti-‘Mormon’ population, and must not be indulged in. I therefore exhort all  good citizens to stay at home, with an assurance that they shall be duly advised  of all movements which may take place, in which they feel interested.

 

“A man near sixty years of age, living about seven miles from this place, was  taken from his house a few nights since, stripped of his clothing, and his back  cut to pieces with a whip, for no other reason than because he was a ‘Mormon,’  and too old to make successful resistance. Conduct of this kind would disgrace a  horde of savages.”

 

A proclamation of this kind, issued by one who was himself none too friendly to  the “Mormon” people, was without effect. At the time he wrote, John McAuley and  Levi Williams the latter a Baptist preacher, and one of the mob who took part in  the murder of Joseph and Hyrum Smith with a strong force were preparing to  gather under arms, contrary to the proclamation of the governor to the effect  that not more than four persons with arms should assemble together, other than  the state troops. Though his force was small, Major Warren notified these  mobbers that he had law and moral force on his side and was able to meet  successfully any mob which could assemble in that county. He advised the  “Mormons” to go on with their preparations to cross the river, as speedily as  they could, and leave the fighting to him; if he should be overpowered, then  they could recross the river and defend themselves and property.

 

Kidnapping of Phineas H. Young and Others

 

On the 11th day of July, eight of the citizens of Nauvoo went into the country  about eleven miles from Nauvoo, to harvest wheat. While engaged in their work  they were surrounded by a mob who ransacked their wagons, seized their weapons,  and then took them one at a time and brutally beat them with hickory goads.  Several of the mobbers engaged in this were recognized, and two, John McAuley  and a man named Brattle, were arrested. While they were under arrest, a second  party of five “Mormons,” Phineas H. Young, Brigham H. Young, Richard Ballantyne,  James Standing and James Herring, were waylaid and taken prisoners. When they  asked why they were treated in that manner the answer was given that they had  committed no offense, but they were “Mormons,” and were to be held as hostages  for the safety of McAuley and Brattle. They were held by their persecutors for  fourteen days, several times facing guns expecting to be shot, from which they  were saved only by interposition of Divine power. Attempts were made to poison  them, and they were most inhumanely treated. Finally they made their escape and  returned to Nauvoo.

 

The “Resistance of Law”

 

When the two mobbers were arrested a gun was found in the possession of McAuley  belonging to one of the harvesters. It was recognized and seized by William  Pickett, a non-“Mormon.” For this action Pickett and two others were arrested by  the mobbers on a “warrant” for “stealing.” Pickett had incurred the hatred of  the mob, and knowing that the charge against him was only a trick to get him  into their hands, he was not inclined to yield. When John Carlin came from  Carthage to arrest him, Pickett asked if he would be guaranteed safety. Carlin  answered no; whereupon Pickett resisted arrest. Though later he went before the  magistrate at Green Plains, who issued the warrant, and was released.

 

The “resistance” by Pickett was the thing most desired by the mob, who only  wanted a pretext to attack Nauvoo. Now there had been a defiance of law. “Nauvoo  was in rebellion,” and Carlin issued a proclamation calling upon the citizens to  come as a  posse comitatus, and assist him in executing the law. The citizens of  Nauvoo petitioned the governor for protection, for the mob forces were  collecting under command of James W. Singleton, assisted by J. B. Chittenden,  N. Montgomery, James King, J. H. Sherman and Thomas S. Brockman. The governor  very graciously sent Major Parker with a force of ten men, and authorized him to  take command of such forces as he could raise from volunteers, and defend the  city against mob attacks. There were very few members of the Church in Nauvoo at  the time, less than one hundred and fifty men who were available for defense.

 

Counter Proclamations

 

Parker issued a proclamation calling upon the mobs in the name of the state and  by virtue of his authority, to disperse. Carlin and his crowd answered by a  counter proclamation, stating that they would consider the government forces as  a mob. Parker wrote to Singleton desiring a compromise without shedding blood.  Articles of agreement requiring all the Saints to leave Nauvoo within sixty  days, were drawn up and signed by Singleton and Chittenden for the mob, and  Major Parker and three others for the government forces. In this manner Parker  treated the mobbers as his equals and agreed to their terms.

 

Threats Against the Saints

 

It appears that the object for which the mob forces were ostensibly raised was  entirely forgotten, and no more was heard of the resistance of the officers by  Pickett, but the attacking forces now determined that all the “Mormons” should  go. Singleton in his communication to Parker said: “When I say to you, the  ‘Mormons’ must go, I speak the mind of the camp and the country. They can leave  without force or injury to themselves or their property, but I say to you sir,  with all candor, they shall go they may fix the time within sixty days, or I  will fix it for them.”

 

Attack Upon Nauvoo

 

These terms did not satisfy the mob. Sixty days was too long a time for them to  wait for the departure of the remnant of the “Mormons” that they might plunder  and rob, and besides they thirsted for blood. Singleton and Chittenden withdrew  from the command of the mob forces, and wrote to Parker saying that the mob had  rejected their treaty, which they considered reasonable enough. Carlin, the  constable, thereupon placed Thomas S. Brockman in command, and gave orders for  the mob to march. Parker also withdrew from service and Major Benjamin Clifford,  Jr., took command of the government forces at Nauvoo by a commission from  Governor Ford. September 10, Brockman and his mob approached Nauvoo. Many of  the new citizens, seeing the danger they were in, fled from the city, leaving  but a small force of volunteers to aid Major Clifford in the defense of Nauvoo.  The defenders converted some steamboat shafts into cannon and threw up some  fortifications on the north side of Mulholland street facing the mob. This small  force made a determined stand, although outnumbered two or three to one. On the  10th, 11th and 12th, there was desultory firing on both sides. On Saturday the  12th Brockman sent a communication “to the commander of the ‘Mormon’ forces in  Nauvoo,” demanding a surrender and the delivery of arms, to be returned as soon  as the “Mormons” had crossed the river and were out of the state. The same day  Major Clifford replied stating that there was no “commander of ‘Mormon’ forces”  in that place; that he was there “by order of the governor and  commander-in-chief of the Illinois militia to disperse your (Brockman’s) forces  in the name of the people of Illinois.” The reply continued: “So far I have  acted on the defensive, and for the sake of humanity; if for no other purpose, I  hope you will at once see the propriety and justice of dispersing your forces.  The armed force under your command is not necessary for any lawful purpose in  this city or county.”

 

The Battle of Nauvoo

 

Upon receiving this reply, Brockman advanced upon Nauvoo, endeavoring to gain  entrance at the head of Mulholland street, the main street of the city. He was  driven back after a determined resistance by the defenders of the place. The  cowardly mob forces were somewhat disconcerted at the sound of cannon in Nauvoo,  for they thought the besieged citizens were poorly armed, and that to enter the  city would be an easy thing to do. During the battle three of the defenders lost  their lives, namely, Captain William Anderson, his son, August L., a lad fifteen  years of age, and David Norris. Several others were wounded. It cannot be  ascertained how many were killed on the side of the mob, but a large number  were wounded. The fighting continued until the 16th, and the mob was repulsed  four times. On the latter day a treaty of surrender was entered into, through  the agency of a committee of citizens from Quincy, who were in sympathy with the  mob. This treaty which was signed by Andrew Johnson for the Quincy Committee,  Thomas Brockman and John Carlin for the mob, and A. W. Babbitt, J. L. Heywood  and J. S. Fullmer for the Latter-day Saints, stipulated that the city of Nauvoo  should surrender September 17, at three o’clock p.m. The arms of the besieged  were to be delivered up to the “Quincy Committee,” to be returned at the  crossing of the river. The citizens and property were to be protected from all  violence. The sick and helpless were to be protected and treated with humanity,  and the “Mormon” population was to leave the state as soon as they could cross  the river. There were provisions of minor importance, one of which was that five  men including the trustees of the Church  were to be permitted to remain in the  city to dispose of property, free from all molestation and violence. However,  William Pickett, the man so much wanted according to the first reports of the  mob for resisting the law, and on whose account the mob had gathered, was not to  be one of this committee, nor was he to remain in the city.

 

Valiant Defenders

 

Among those who took valiant part in the battles during the siege of Nauvoo were  the two Andersons, father and son, and David Norris, who lost their lives. They  belonged to a company known as the “Spartan Band,” because of the perilous  situation in which they were stationed in the defense of the city. Also “Squire”  Daniel H. Wells, Captain Andrew L. Lamereaux, William L. Cutler, Alexander  McRae, Almon Fullmer, Benjamin Whitehead, John E. Campbell and Curtis E. Bolton.  In fact the entire band of noble defenders are worthy of special mention, and  their names should be recorded among the true sons of liberty.4

 

The Violation of the Treaty

 

According to the agreement, the mob forces entered Nauvoo on the 17th, and in  keeping with the usual mob spirit, failed to regard their agreement. Immediately  they commenced to drive the Saints from the city, and treated some of the men in  a most brutal manner. They commenced their diabolical deeds by searching the  wagons on the bank of the river waiting to be ferried across, and ransacked  their contents taking all firearms and scattering the goods over the ground.  Families of the poor were ordered from the city at the point of the bayonet. The  sick were sorely abused, and even those who were engaged in the burying of their  dead were molested. They entered the temple, ascended the tower and rung the  bell, shouting and yelling, and giving vent to filthy oaths in a fiendish  manner. They plundered the homes of the people, irrespective of whether they  were members of the Church or not. Colonel C. M. Johnson was sentenced to death,  but his persecutors could not agree on the manner of his execution and he  escaped. With such inhuman treatment, the members of the Church remaining in  Nauvoo, were forced across the Mississippi River in their poverty and distress.  Their condition was pitiable, but it could not move the hearts of the mobs of  Illinois. These outcasts camped on the bank of the river for several days, where  the Lord in his mercy fed them, as he did the children of Israel, with a supply  of quails, until help arrived from the camps of Israel in the wilderness. As  soon as they could leave they bid farewell to the inhospitable boundaries of  “civilization” and took up their journey toward the west, there to build a city  of refuge, and find a haven of rest among the more tender-hearted savages of the  desert.

 

Notes

 

1.  The same day two hundred and thirty-five members of the Church, from  branches in the New England and the Atlantic States, under the direction of  Samuel Brannan, sailed from New York for California. They had chartered the ship  “Brooklyn” at twelve hundred dollars per month, the lessee to pay the port  charges. They carried with them farming implements of all kinds, blacksmith,  carpenter and wheelwright tools and fixtures, the necessary parts for two  gristmills and sawmill irons. They also carried text books on various subjects  and many other volumes. The press and type on which the Prophet a paper  published by the Church in New York was printed, and sufficient paper and other  things as would be needed to establish a new colony in their distant home. They  arrived at Yerba Buena, now San Francisco, Wednesday, July 29, 1846, having  gone around Cape Horn and touched at the Hawaiian Islands. On their arrival they  found the American flag waving over the fort the guns of which had saluted them  on their entrance into the bay. Three weeks earlier the United States Flag had  been raised and the country occupied in the name of the government. In January,  1847, Samuel Brannan commenced publishing a newspaper at Yerba Buena called the   California Star, the first English paper published in California.

 

 2. On the first night of the encampment of Sugar Creek nine infants were born.  The weather was inclement and extremely cold and the people without proper  shelter. Writing of these conditions, Eliza R. Snow, the poetess, has said: “As  we journeyed onward, mothers gave birth to offspring under almost every variety  of circumstances imaginable, except those to which they had been accustomed;  some in tents, others in wagons in rainstorms and in snowstorms. I heard of one  birth which occurred under the rude shelter of a hut, the sides of which were  formed of blankets fastened to poles stuck in the ground, with a bark roof  through which the rain was dripping. Kind sisters stood holding dishes to catch  the water as it fell, thus protecting the newcomer and its mother from a  showerbath as the little innocent first entered on the stage of human life; and  through faith in the Great Ruler of events, no harm resulted to either.

 

“Let it be remembered that the mothers of these wilderness-born babies were not  savages, accustomed to roam the forest and brave the storm and tempest those who  had never known the comforts and delicacies of civilization and refinement. They  were not those who, in the wilds of nature, nursed their offspring amid reeds  and rushes, or in the recesses of rocky caverns; most of them were born and  educated in the Eastern States had there embraced the Gospel as taught by Jesus  and his apostles, and, for the sake of their religion, had gathered with the  Saints, and under trying circumstances had assisted, by their faith, patience  and energies, in making Nauvoo what its name indicates, “the beautiful.” They  had lovely homes, decorated with flowers and enriched with choice fruit trees,  just beginning to yield plentifully.

 

“To these homes, without lease or sale, they had just bade a final adieu, and  with what little of their substance could be packed into one, two, and in some  instances three wagons, had started out, desertward, for where? To this question  the only response at that time was, God knows” (Women of Mormondom, Tullidge,  ch. 32).

 

3.  It was not the intention of the Saints to leave Nauvoo until the springtime  had fully arrived. But the human fiends, who hated the religion of the Saints  and coveted their substance and property, were not willing for them to wait.  What cared they for the suffering and exposure of an innocent people, driven  from their homes and sheltered by the broad canopy of heaven in the midst of  winter? “We could have remained sheltered in our homes,” said President Brigham  Young, “had it not been for the threats and hostile demonstrations of our  enemies, who, notwithstanding their solemn agreements, had thrown every obstacle  in our way, not respecting either life, or liberty, or property; so much so that  our only means of avoiding a rupture was by starting in mid-winter. Our homes,  gardens, orchards, farms, streets, bridges, mills, public halls, magnificent  temple, and other public improvements we leave as a monument of our patriotism,  industry, economy, uprightness of purpose, and integrity of heart; and as a  living testimony of the falsehood and wickedness of those who charge us with  disloyalty to the Constitution of our country, idleness and dishonesty”  (Manuscript History of the Church).

 

 4. Daniel H. Wells, who had joined the Church August 9, 1846, after the  departure of most of the members of the Church, but who had always been a true  friend to the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch Hyrum Smith, addressed the remaining  members of the Church, while they were in the hands of their enemies, as  follows:

 

 “There is no use in the small handful of volunteers trying to defend the city  against such an overwhelming force. What interest have the Saints to expect from  its defense? Our interests are not identified with it but in getting away from  it. Who could urge the propriety of exposing life to defend a place for the  purpose of vacating it? I have been in the councils of Joseph and Hyrum and the  twelve, and I know they were desirous that the Saints should leave the state and  go westward. Have not the twelve and most of the Church gone, and is not their  counsel for us to follow? Have not they told us that our safety was not in  Nauvoo, but in our removal westward?

 

 “The trustees have no means with which to carry on the defense; they are already  involved. Major Parker, who was sent by the governor to aid us, when he left,  promised to raise men and return immediately to our assistance, but he has  forsaken us, and is it not well known that the Quincy Committee was prepared to  join the mob, if a treaty was not effected? Under these circumstances, I have  thrown in my influence with the trustees for the surrender of Nauvoo upon the  best terms we could get, and as being the best and only wise policy left for us  to pursue.

 

 “Brethren, reflect, we have nothing to gain in defending Nauvoo, but everything  to lose; not only property, but life also, is hourly in peril.”

 

 Chapter 38 The Mormon Battalion. 1846 through 1847

 

Captain Allen’s Circular

 

When Captain James Allen arrived in the Camps of the Saints, he issued a  “Circular to the ‘Mormons,’” which read as follows:

 

 “I have come among you, instructed by Colonel S.  W. Kearny, of the U. S. Army,  now commanding the Army of the West, to visit the ‘Mormon’ Camp, and accept the  services for twelve months of four or five companies of ‘Mormon’ men who may be  willing to serve their country for that period in our present war with Mexico;  this force to unite with the Army of the West at Santa Fe, and be marched thence  to California, where they will be discharged.

 

“They will receive pay and rations, and other allowances, such as other  volunteers or regular soldiers receive, from the day they shall be mustered into  the service, and will be entitled to all comforts and benefits of regular  soldiers of the Army, and when discharged, as contemplated, at California, they  will be given gratis their arms and accoutrements, with which they will be fully  equipped at Fort Leavenworth. Thus is offered to the ‘Mormon’ people now this  year an opportunity of sending a portion of their young and intelligent men to  the ultimate destination of their whole people, and entirely at the expense of  the United States, and this advance party can thus pave the way and look out the  land for their brethren to come after them.

 

“The pay of a private volunteer is seven dollars per month, and the allowance  for clothing is the cost price of clothing of a regular soldier.

 

“Those of the ‘Mormons’ who are desirous of serving their country on the  conditions here enumerated, are requested to meet me without delay at their  principal camp at the Council Bluffs, whither I am now going to consult with  their principal men, and to receive and organize the force contemplated to be  raised.

 

“I will receive all healthy, able men of from eighteen to forty-five years of  age.

 

“J. Allen, Captain 1st Dragoons.”

 

“Camp of the ‘Mormons,’ at Mount Pisgah, one hundred and thirty miles east of  Council Bluffs, June 26th, 1846.”

 

Scarcity of Able-Bodied Men

 

When this call came a great part of the young men of the ages required were  scattered over the plains. Many had gone to St. Louis and other points for  employment to obtain means to help them carry their families to the west. All of  the Saints were poor, and some in dire want. Those who were able to travel were  under the necessity of helping along the weak, the aged and infirm, who could  not be left behind. Among the teamsters were found mere children, who had been  forced into such service because of the limited number of men.

 

The Equipment of the Battalion

 

At Fort Leavenworth the battalion was equipped.1 They received one tent for  every six privates and were provided with flint-lock muskets, a few cap-lock  yauger rifles for sharp-shooting and hunting, and other camp accoutrements. July  5, they drew their check for clothing, forty-two dollars each, paid one year in  advance. A goodly portion of this money was sent back for the support of their  families and the gathering of the poor from Nauvoo. They also contributed to  help Elders Orson Hyde, Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor on their way to Great  Britain and Elder Jesse C. Little to return to his field in the Eastern States.  The paymaster was much surprised to see every man of the battalion able to sign  his name to the roll, whereas only about one out of every three of the Missouri  volunteers, who previously had received their pay, could put his signature to  the document.

 

Death of Colonel Allen

 

Captain James Allen, the recruiting officer for the battalion, was selected by  General Stephen W. Kearny, to take command of the “Mormon” troops, with the rank  of lieutenant-colonel of volunteers. At Fort Leavenworth Colonel Allen was taken  ill, and on the 12th of August, ordered the battalion to take up its march while  he remained for a few days to recuperate, but on the 23rd, he died. He was much  lamented by the battalion members, for they had learned to love him for his  kindness.

 

Lieutenant Smith in Command

 

After the death of Colonel Allen, the command devolved upon Captain Jefferson  Hunt, of Company “A.” The promise had been made to President Young, by Colonel  Allen, that no officers would be chosen for the battalion, except himself,  outside of their ranks. On what authority the promise was made, does not appear.  However, shortly afterwards Lieutenant A. J. Smith, of the regular army, was  given command, contrary to the wishes of the men. With Lieutenant Smith there  came Dr. George B. Sanderson, whom Colonel Allen had appointed to serve with the  battalion as surgeon. According to the journals of the men, they were caused to  suffer considerably because of the “arrogance, inefficiency and petty  oppressions” of these two officers. Sanderson was from Missouri, and perhaps was  none too friendly towards the troops; however, the enforcement of discipline, to  which they were not accustomed, may have magnified the ill-treatment in their  eyes to some extent. The heat of the summer was excessive, their rations were  reduced, and through the drinking of brackish water, many were taken with  malaria. They had already become weakened from their long marches across the  plains of Iowa, in inclement weather, without proper food and shelter, so that  they were more susceptible to disease. Dr. Sanderson prescribed calomel and  arsenic, refusing to permit the men to resort to their own simple remedies, and  evincing skepticism in the laying on of hands and their exercise of faith.

 

The Line of March

 

Their line of march from Fort Leavenworth had taken them across the Kansas River  and then westward to the Arkansas, which they followed upstream for about one  hundred miles. From that point they journeyed southwest to the Cimarron River  and passed near what is now the junction of the states of Kansas, Colorado and  Oklahoma, on a southwesterly course to the old Spanish town of Santa Fe. From  Santa Fe their route was by way of the Rio Grande, southward near the present  city of El Paso, and thence to the west, through the city of Tucson which was  deserted by its garrison as the battalion approached across the Gila and  Colorado to San Diego.

 

The Families Ordered to Pueblo

 

As the battalion was leaving the Arkansas River, the commanding officer gave  orders that a number of families which had accompanied the troops to that point,  should be detached and sent to Pueblo, a Mexican town situated at the eastern  base of the Rocky Mountains. There was some protest because it was contrary to a  promise given at the beginning of the march; but it was really a necessary  action. For the families of members of the battalion to travel with the  companies was a hindrance to the rapid progress they were called upon to make.  Captain Nelson Higgins and a guard of ten men were detailed to make the journey  to Pueblo. They departed September 16, 1846, and on the way one of their number,  Norman Sharp, was accidentally killed.

 

Colonel Cooke Takes Command

 

Leaving the Arkansas the battalion resumed its journey to Santa Fe. On the 2nd  of October they crossed Red River where they were divided into two divisions the  following day. The strongest and most able-bodied men pushed on with all speed  and arrived at Santa Fe on the 9th of that month. Here they were received with a  salute of one hundred guns by Colonel Alexander Doniphan, the post commander. On  October 12, the second division arrived, and immediately afterward Captain  Phillip St. George Cooke, an officer of dragoons, succeeded to the command with  the rank of lieutenant-colonel, by appointment of General Kearny. The  appointment of Col. Cooke was another disappointment to the men, who still  hoped for the appointment of Captain Hunt; but they learned to respect and  honor this rugged officer who was a thorough soldier and just and honorable.  Lieutenant A. J. Smith remained with the battalion as acting commissary, and Dr.  Sanderson continued to administer his calomel and arsenic to the men.

 

The Sick Sent to Pueblo

 

At Santa Fe a council of officers was held with Colonels Doniphan and Cooke, and  it was decided to send all the sick together with the remaining women and  children in the camp, to Pueblo for the winter, with the privilege of journeying  towards the main body of pioneers in the spring, at government expense. Colonel  Cooke detailed Captain James Brown and Lieutenant Elam Luddington to take charge  of this company on the march to Pueblo. October 18, 1846, Captain Brown left  Santa Fe with nearly ninety men reported as incapable of undertaking the journey  to California because of physical ailments. Accompanying them were a number of  women and children. Sanderson, the physician, discharged some of these men  without pay or means to procure conveyance to the states, whereupon Colonel  Doniphan, in charge of the post, went to Col. Cooke and countermanded the order  with the statement that General Kearny would never discharge a man under  circumstances of that kind, and ordered the men with the laundresses and others,  to be sent to Pueblo and to draw their pay. Their journey took them over a rough  country a distance of some two hundred miles. Several died on the way and others  succumbed after Pueblo was reached. They arrived November 17 and selected a  place for winter quarters near the encampment of Captain Higgins and a company  of Saints who had previously arrived in Pueblo from Mississippi, on their way to  the Rocky Mountains. November 10, 1846, Lieutenant William W. Willis was also  ordered back to Pueblo with another company of sick fifty-six men from a point  about one hundred miles out from Santa Fe. They commenced their journey with  one wagon, four yoke of oxen, and rations barely sufficient to last them five  days, on a march of three hundred miles. After a most severe and toilsome  journey, in which they all suffered many privations and some laid down their  lives, the company arrived in Pueblo, in an emaciated condition, December 24,  1846.

 

The March From Santa Fe

 

The march of the battalion from Santa Fe was taken up October 19, 1846. They had  not traveled very far before they were reduced to the extremity of using their  poor oxen, which were barely skin and bones, for food. Even their raw hides were  cut in small pieces and made into soup. At times they crossed deserts where  water could not be found to quench their thirst, and their tongues became  swollen and their lips parched until their strength failed them.

 

Colonel Cooke’s Comment

 

Writing of the condition of the battalion when he took command, Colonel Cooke  made a report in the following words:

 

 “Everything conspired to discourage the extraordinary undertaking of marching  this battalion eleven hundred miles, for the much greater part through an  unknown wilderness, without road or trail, and with a wagon train.

 

“It was enlisted too much by families; some were too old some feeble, and some  too young; it was embarrassed by many women; it was undisciplined; it was much  worn by traveling on foot, and marching from Nauvoo, Illinois; their clothing  was very scant; there was no money to pay them, or clothing to issue; their  mules were utterly broken down; the quartermaster department was without funds,  and its credit bad; mules were scarce. Those procured were very inferior, and  were deteriorating every hour for lack of forage or grazing. .  . .

 

“With every effort, the quartermaster could only undertake to furnish rations  for sixty days; and, in fact, full rations, of only flour, sugar, coffee and  salt; salt pork only for thirty days, and soap for twenty. To venture without  pack-saddles would be grossly imprudent, and so that burden was added.”2

 

A Battle with Wild Bulls

 

A short distance northwest of the site of the present city of El Paso the course  of the march was towards the west. On the San Pedro River they encountered herds  of wild cattle, and were viciously attacked by ferocious bulls. The troops had  been ordered to travel with unloaded guns, but now they were hastily forced to  load without waiting the command. These vicious animals, as if resenting the  encroachment on their domain, made a charge upon the camp. This constituted the  only fighting the troops were called upon to do on their long and toilsome  march. When the battle was over the casualties revealed a number of gored mules  and overturned wagons, and among the “enemy” perhaps some sixty of the charging  animals were killed. Resuming their journey they camped on the 16th of December,  near the Mexican pueblo of Tucson. On their way they met three Mexican soldiers  bringing a message from the governor of Tucson to Colonel Cooke, informing him  that he must pass around the town, or else he would have to fight. Colonel Cooke  was not to be frightened by such an order. His route would take him through the  village, and hither he resumed his march. The following day he passed through  Tucson without meeting opposition, as the soldiers and a great many of the  citizens had fled on his approach. Before arriving at that place he instructed  his men that they came not to make war on Sonora, and less still to destroy an  important outpost of defense against Indians. “But,” said he, “we will take the  straight road before us and overcome all resistance, but shall I remind you that  the American soldier ever shows justice and kindness to the unarmed and  unresisting? The property of individuals you will hold sacred: the people of  Sonora are not our enemies.”

 

The Journey From Tucson

 

Leaving Tucson, the battalion crossed an extensive desert, where, for  seventy-five miles, they were without water for their mules. By hard marching  they reached the Gila River and intersected General Kearny’s trail, which they  had left 474 miles behind in the valley of the Rio Grande. They were now in the  land of the Pima and Maricopa Indians who inhabited a fertile territory. These  were a superior race of Indians with peaceful tendencies, who spent their time  tilling the soil, and in weaving rather than bearing arms. While passing through  these villages Colonel Cooke remarked to Captain Jefferson Hunt that this might  be a good place for the settlement of the “Mormon” people. Hunt proposed such a  thing to the natives who received it favorably, and this may have lent its  weight to the colonizing of these valleys by the Latter-day Saints in later  years.

 

At this point they were met by pilots sent back by General Kearny to conduct  them to the Pacific coast. Most of the distance on the remaining journey was  over deserts with alternating stretches of deep sand and miry clay. January 9,  1847, they crossed the Colorado, near the junction of the Gila, and continued  their march under great difficulties over the coast range down the Pacific  slope. January 27, 1847, they passed San Luis Rey, and two days later arrived at  the San Diego Mission where they located one mile below the Catholic mission,  and about five miles from the seaport town of San Diego, where General Kearny  had his quarters.

 

“Orders No. 1”

 

On the day after their arrival at San Diego, Colonel Cooke issued the following  orders, which were read to the men:

 

 “Headquarters ‘Mormon’ Battalion, “Mission of San Diego, “January 30, 1847.”

 

“(Orders No. 1.)

 

“The Lieutenant-Colonel commanding, congratulates the battalion on their safe  arrival on the shore of the Pacific Ocean, and the conclusion of their march of  over two thousand miles.

 

“History may be searched in vain for an equal march of infantry. Half of it has  been through a wilderness where nothing but savages and wild beasts are found,  or deserts where, for want of water, there is no living creature. There, with  almost hopeless labor, we have dug deep wells, which the future traveler will  enjoy. Without a guide who had traversed them we have ventured into trackless  table-lands where water was not found for several marches. With crowbar and pick  and axe in hand, we have worked our way over mountains, which seemed to defy  aught save the wild goat, and hewed a passage through a chasm of living rock  more narrow than our wagons. To bring these first wagons to the Pacific, we have  preserved the strength of our mules by herding them over large tracts, which you  have laboriously guarded without loss. The garrison of four presidios of Sonora  concentrated within the walls of Tucson, gave us no pause. We drove them out,  with their artillery, but our intercourse with the citizens was unmarked by a  single act of injustice. Thus, marching half naked and half fed, and living upon  wild animals, we have discovered and made a road of great value to our country.

 

“Arrived at the first settlement of California, after a single day’s rest, you  cheerfully turned off from the route to this point of promised repose, to enter  upon a campaign, and meet, as we supposed, the approach of the enemy; and this,  too, without even salt to season your sole subsistence of fresh meat.

 

“Lieutenants A. J. Smith and George Stoneman, of the First Dragoons, have shared  and given invaluable aid in all these labors.

 

“Thus, volunteers, you have exhibited some high and essential qualities of  veterans. But much remains undone. Soon you will turn your attention to the  drill, to system and order, to forms also, which are all necessary to the  soldier.

 

“By order,

 

“Lieut. Col. P. St. George Cooke,

 

“P. C. Merrill, Adjutant.”

 

Duties on the Coast

 

For some time the battalion performed garrison duty at San Diego, San Luis Rey  and Los Angeles. While stationed at the latter place they were called upon to  guard the Cajon Pass, in the Sierra Nevada mountains, against hostile Indians.  At San Diego they were employed digging wells, making brick and building houses.  Their frugality and industry won the admiration of the other troops, except the  Missourians of General Fremont’s command, who endeavored to create prejudice  against them.

 

The Discharge of the Battalion Stevenson’s Insult

 

July 16, 1847, all of the battalion at Los Angeles were mustered out of service  by Captain Smith. The time of their enlistment had expired and the prophecy of  President Brigham Young that they would not be called upon to fight, had been  fulfilled. Some of the men, at the request of Colonel Stevenson, of the New York  Volunteers, re-enlisted for six months. Others might have done so, but he  insulted them by saying: “Your patriotism and obedience to your officers have  done much towards removing the prejudice of the government and the community at  large, and I am satisfied that another year’s service would place you on a level  with other communities.”

 

The Journey to Salt Lake Valley

 

On the 20th of July most of the members of the battalion, who did not enlist,  organized preparatory to going to the Rocky Mountains to the gathering place of  the Saints. They went by way of Sutter’s Fort and the Sacramento River,  intending to follow Fremont’s trail across the Sierras. Near Lake Tahoe, they  met Samuel Brannan and Captain Brown of the Pueblo detachment who were on the  way to California, and learned that the pioneers had entered the Salt Lake  Valley. Captain Brown carried with him an epistle from the apostles advising all  members of the battalion who had no means, to remain in California for the  winter, and journey to the Salt Lake Valley in the spring. Acting on this advice  about one half of the members obtained employment at Sutter’s Fort, where they  were employed at the time of the discovery of gold. The others pushed on to the  Salt Lake Valley where they arrived October 16, 1847.

 

Notes

 

1.  The five companies of the battalion were commanded respectively as follows:  Company A, Jefferson Hunt; Company B, Jesse D. Hunter; Company C, James Brown;  Company D, Nelson Higgins; Company E, Daniel C. Davis. Before they left Winter  Quarters, a farewell ball was given them in “Father Taylor’s Bowery,” where the  afternoon was spent in dancing and such merriment as the sadness of the  approaching parting would admit.

 

2.  Conquest of New Mexico and California, by P. St. George Cooke, p. 91 through 2.

 

 Chapter 39 The Pioneers. 1847

 

Revelation to President Brigham Young

 

January 14, 1847, the word of the Lord came to President Brigham Young, at  Winter Quarters, giving instructions for the guidance of the camps of Israel on  their journeyings to the west. The Saints were to be organized into companies,  with captains over hundreds, fifties and tens, as the case had been while  journeying across Iowa. These companies were to be presided over by a president  and two counselors, under the direction of the Twelve Apostles, who were at the  head of all the camps of Israel. The Saints were to enter into a covenant “to  keep all the commandments and statutes of the Lord,” and each company was to  bear an equal proportion of the responsibility in the care of the widows, the  fatherless, and the families of those who had gone into the army. Every man was  commanded to use his influence and property to remove the body of the people to  the place the Lord had designated as a stake of Zion; and if they would do this  they were to be blessed abundantly in their substance and in their families.  Moreover, they were to prepare houses and fields for those who were to remain  behind that season, that they might prepare also for the journey.

 

Cheerfulness Commanded

 

“If thou art merry,” the revelation read (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 136), “praise the  Lord with singing, with music, with dancing, and with prayer of praise and  thanksgiving. If thou art sorrowful, call on the Lord thy God with supplication,  that your souls may be joyful.” During their travels in the wilderness the  exiled Saints had many hardships to endure. The lack of necessary food, of  clothing and other substance, was lamentable. Yet, in the midst of poverty and  distress, they were happy for they were free from enemies and the persecutions  of mobs. They were going to a land of promise where they could dwell in peace,  and worship the Lord without fear of men. The Lord desired that they should be  cheerful and promised to bless them with his Spirit, in the hour of their  sorrow, if they would call upon him. That they might be light of heart and  filled with joy, the Lord commended music, singing and dancing, if done in the  spirit of reverence and prayer. It was the custom, at the close of the day’s  journey, for the Saints to assemble in the dance, or to have an informal  concert; to relate reminiscences and otherwise employ their time, that the cares  and hardships of their travel might be forgotten, and their burdens lessened  which they were forced to bear.1 At the sound of the bugle, night and morning,  all assembled for prayer. The Sabbath day was strictly kept, and undue levity  was discountenanced in all the camps. They were commanded to be honest, sober,  unselfish and to “contend not one with another,” but always speak with edifying  words.

 

The Pioneers

 

It was commanded in the revelation that a company be organized to depart early  in the spring, composed of a sufficient number of able-bodied and experienced  men, with teams, seeds and farming utensils, to prepare for the planting of  spring crops. As spring approached preparations were under way for the departure  of this pioneer band, and for other companies, as the Saints were able, to  follow after. February 26, 1847, President Brigham Young met in council with the  members of the twelve who were at Winter Quarters and Bishop Newel K. Whitney,  William Clayton and Jedediah M. Grant. The object of this meeting was to  consider the appointment of a pioneer company and their requirements for the  journey. The matter of constructing boats, the carrying of seeds, scientific  investigations, the location of a site for a city, the irrigation, cultivation  and seeding of the land, were all fully discussed. This is the first reference,  so far as the records show, of the discussion of irrigation, which President  Young and the brethren felt would be necessary for their sustenance in their new  home.

 

The Departure for the West

 

Elder Heber C. Kimball, under instructions from President Brigham Young, moved  out of Winter Quarters, April 5, 1847, with six wagons, which he had equipped as  a part of the pioneer company. They traveled about six miles and camped,  awaiting the arrival of the rest of the company. On the 6th of April, the  general conference was held in Winter Quarters, and the following day President  Young, with about twenty-five wagons, traveled some ten miles and camped. From  this point the company which had assembled, continued their journey to the  Elkhorn River, where the information reached them that Elder Parley P. Pratt had  arrived at Winter Quarters from his mission to England, and that Elder John  Taylor was on the way. President Young decided to return, with other members of  the twelve, to receive Elder Pratt’s report of conditions in that foreign  field.2 A few days later Elder John Taylor also arrived, bringing with him two  thousand dollars in gold, contributed by the Saints in Great Britain, to help  the exiles on their westward journey. He also had with him a number of  scientific instruments of great value, including two sextants, one circle of  reflection, two artificial horizons, and a number of barometers, thermometers  and telescopes.

 

Organization of the Pioneer Camp

 

Leaving Elders Pratt and Taylor and later Orson Hyde who joined them from  England in charge of the Saints at Winter Quarters, President Young, with the  other apostles, returned to the pioneer camp, which had journeyed to a position  twelve miles west of the Elkhorn, and some forty-seven miles west of Winter  Quarters. President Young’s departure from Winter Quarters was on the morning of  April 14, 1847, and on the 16th, the pioneer camp was organized with captains of  hundreds, fifties and tens, as follows:

 

Captains of Hundreds: Stephen Markham and Albert P. Rockwood.

 

Captains of Fifties: Addison Everett, Tarlton Lewis, James Case, John Pack,  Shadrack Roundy.

 

Captains of Tens: Wilford Woodruff, Ezra T. Benson, Phineas H. Young, Luke S.  Johnson,3 Stephen G. Goddard, Charles Shumway, James Case, Seth Taft, Howard  Egan, Appleton M. Harmon, John S. Higbee, Norton Jacobs, John Brown, and Joseph  Matthews.

 

The total number of souls in the camp was one hundred and forty-eight, of whom  three were women and two were children. The women were: Harriet Page Wheeler  Young, wife of Lorenzo D. Young; Clarissa Decker Young, wife of Brigham Young;  and Ellen Saunders Kimball, wife of Heber C. Kimball. Three of the company were  colored: Hark Lay, Oscar Crosby and Green Flake, who had come west with the  emigrants from Mississippi, under command of John Brown in the summer of 1846.  Originally the pioneer company was composed of one hundred and forty-four men,  but one, Ellis Ames, was taken sick and returned to Winter Quarters soon after  the start. Two of the pioneers were not members of the Church.

 

Military Organization

 

In addition to the organization mentioned, on April 17, they were also organized  into a military camp with President Brigham Young as lieutenant-general; Stephen  Markham, colonel; John Pack and Shadrack Roundy, majors; and the captains of  tens, as formerly organized, to hold similar rank in the military organization.  Thomas Bullock was appointed clerk of the camp, with some assistants, and Thomas  Tanner, captain of the cannon, with the privilege of choosing eight men to  assist him.

 

Division of the Watch

 

The captains of tens selected forty-eight men for a constant night guard. They  were divided into four watches to serve half a night at a time. President Young  and others of the twelve were among the members of this guard. As there was  danger of Indian raids, orders were given that every man should keep by the side  of his wagon and not leave it except by permission, and he should carry a loaded  gun always ready for instant use.

 

Regulations of the Cam

 

pSunday, April 18, 1847, in the afternoon, President Young met with the captains  of the camp and decided on the details for the government of the camp as  follows:

 

 “At 5 o’clock in the morning the bugle is to be sounded as a signal for every  man to arise and attend prayers before he leaves his wagon. Then the people will  engage in cooking, eating, feeding teams, etc., until 7 o’clock, at which time  the train is to move at the sound of the bugle. Each teamster is to keep beside  his team with loaded gun in hand or within easy reach, while the extra men,  observing the same rule regarding their weapons, are to walk by the side of  their particular wagons to which they belong; and no man may leave his post  without permission of his officer. In case of an attack or any hostile  demonstration by Indians, the wagons will travel in double file  the order of  encampment to be in a circle, with the mouth of each wagon to the outside and  the horses and cattle tied inside the circle. At 8:30 p.m., the bugles are to be  sounded again, upon which signal all will hold prayers in their wagons, and be  retired to rest by 9 o’clock.”

 

The Route of Travel

 

The line of travel taken by the pioneers was along the north bank of the Platte  River to Fort Laramie, and from there they crossed the river, and continued over  the Oregon trail up the Sweetwater and over the Continental divide through the  South Pass across Green River to Fort Bridger. They then traveled to the  southwest through Echo Canyon, and East Canyon over Big and Little Mountain into  Emigration Canyon, and then to the valley of the Great Salt Lake.

 

On the south side of the Platte was the Oregon trail, but the pioneers remained  on the north bank where there was no trail, for reasons expressed by Elder  Wilford Woodruff as follows:

 

“We were convinced that it would be better for us as a company to cross the  river and take the old traveled road to Laramie as there was good grass all the  way on that side, while the Indians were burning it all off on the north of the  river where we were traveling. But when we took into consideration the situation  of the next company, and the thousands that would follow, and as we were the  Pioneers and had not our wives and children with us we thought it best to keep  on the north side of the river and brave the difficulties of burning prairies to  make a road that should stand as a permanent route for the Saints, independent  of the then immigrant road, and let the river separate the emigrating companies  that they need not quarrel for wood, grass, or water; and when our next company  came along, the grass would be much better for them than it would be on the  south side, as it would grow up by the time they would get along; and the vote  was called and it was unanimous to go on the north side of the river; so the  camp again moved on.”

 

Measuring the Distance

 

The pioneers were anxious to know the distance of each day’s travel and the  length of the entire journey. In order to obtain this information they first  resorted to guesswork, but this proved unsatisfactory. They then tied a piece of  cloth to a wheel of one of the wagons and a man was placed on duty to count the  revolutions. However, this was tedious though accurate if the count was  correctly kept. April 19 William Clayton suggested to Orson Pratt that a set of  wooden cog wheels might be attached to the wheel of a wagon to record the  distance automatically. The result was that an odometer was constructed on “the  principle of the endless screw” and was installed during the month of May,  after they were well along on the journey.

 

Dangers on the Way

 

The pioneers were under the necessity of keeping constantly on the alert to  protect themselves from attacks by Indians. They had considerable anxiety while  passing through the Pawnee tribes. At times the brethren were fired upon. The  Indians made several attempts at night to creep into the camp, evidently to  plunder and steal animals. At one time before the camp was organized for the  night they were successful in stealing two of the best horses belonging to Dr.  Willard Richards and Jesse C. Little. The following day, April 27, a party was  sent out to search for the missing animals. They encountered a number of Indians  who endeavored to decoy them to a point where the brethren would be in their  power, but they were on the alert and well armed, so the Indians dared not make  an attack. As the brethren prepared to return to camp the Indians fired upon  them, whereupon the searching party turned upon their foe, and the Indians  hastily fled.

 

Not all of the Indians, however, were hostile. Generally they showed a friendly  spirit, but were ever ready to commit theft. The brethren at times gave them a  few articles such as powder, lead, flour and salt.

 

Correspondence on the Plains

 

On the 4th of May, after the camp had proceeded about two miles on their way,  they were met by a Frenchman, Charles Beaumont, a trapper and fur trader, who  was traveling eastward over the Oregon road with a camp consisting of three  wagons and nine men. He crossed the river to find out who the pioneers were.  During his interview he cheerfully consented to carry letters back to the  Saints, so the brethren wrote some fifty or sixty letters and left them in his  care. Other means of communication with the later companies on the plains were  adopted. Posts were placed at prominent points along the road with writing on  them and letters were placed in improvised boxes with a notice on the box. At  other times they used whitened skulls of the buffalo. Over a portion of the  journey, especially from Fort Laramie, the pioneers planted mile posts every  ten miles as the distance was measured by their odometer.

 

Scientific Observations

 

Astronomical observations were constantly taken. The temperature was recorded  daily, also the altitude as shown by barometrical pressure. This was done under  the able direction of Elder Orson Pratt, one of the great scientists of his  time.

 

Crossing of the Platte

 

At Fort Laramie the pioneers were forced to cross the Platte owing to the fact  that the north side of the river was impassable. They hired a flatboat from a  Frenchman, Mr. James Bordeaux, who was in charge of the post. They paid him  fifteen dollars for the accommodation. Mr. Bordeaux treated the brethren very  kindly, and informed them that Lilburn W. Boggs, with a company of Missourians  en route to Oregon, left the fort but a short time before. These emigrants had  endeavored to embitter him against the “Mormons.” The Missourians, he said, were  constantly quarreling and were great thieves. Bordeaux gave the pioneers  information regarding the route before them and said the Crow Indians were  troublesome and had lately run off all the horses and mules from the fort.

 

The Mississippi Emigrants

 

Soon after the pioneers arrived at Fort Laramie they were joined by a company of  seventeen emigrants of the Mississippi Saints who had wintered at Pueblo, where  the sick detachments of the Mormon Battalion, under command of Captains Brown  and Higgins, were also stationed. They had been at the fort two weeks awaiting  the arrival of the pioneers. These emigrants consisted of the members of the  Crow and Therlkill families, others being Archibald Little, James Chesney and  Lewis B. Myers. They had five wagons, one cart, eleven horses, twenty-four oxen,  twenty-two cows, three bulls and seven calves. From these Mississippi Saints  the pioneers obtained their first knowledge in many months, of the battalion.  Four of the pioneers, Amasa M. Lyman, Thomas Woolsey, John H. Tippits, and  Roswell Stevens, were sent to Pueblo on horse-back and with mules, to take  charge of the remaining body of the Mississippians and conduct them to the Salt  Lake Valley.

 

The Ferry at the Black Hills

 

From Winter Quarters to Fort Laramie the Pioneers had broken a new road over the  plains, which was destined to be traveled by the emigrating Saints for many  years. Subsequently the Union Pacific Railroad was built along a great portion  of the trail. Continuing their journey, the pioneers arrived, Saturday, June 12,  1847, at the Black Hills, where the Oregon road crossed the Platte, some one  hundred and forty-two miles from Fort Laramie. Here they overtook the Oregon  emigrants, including the Missourians. The pioneers had sent an advance company  three days before to prepare for the crossing of the river, with a sole-leather  skiff capable of carrying eighteen hundred pounds. These brethren were employed  in ferrying the emigrants over the river at the rate of $1.50 for each wagon  load, receiving their pay in flour, meal and bacon, at Missouri prices. Their  stock of provisions at this time was in need of replenishing, and to have the  privilege of ferrying their old enemies from Missouri over the river at this  price, gave them some satisfaction. “It looked as much of a miracle to me,” said  Elder Wilford Woodruff, “to see our flour and meal bags replenished in the Black  Hills, as it did to have the children of Israel fed with manna in the  wilderness. But the Lord has been truly with us on our journey, and has  wonderfully blessed and preserved us.” The Missourians kept on their way,  quarreling, cursing and fighting among themselves, while the brethren camped, as  was their custom, on the Sabbath day. Monday, June 14, they commenced crossing  the river, taking their wagons on light rafts made of poles. It was concluded  to leave several brethren at this ferry, to help the oncoming emigrant trains  for Oregon, in the hope of earning enough to supply the pioneer company with  provisions. For this purpose Thomas Grover, John S. Higbee, Luke S. Johnson,  Appleton M. Harmon, Edmund Ellsworth, Francis M. Pomeroy, William Empey, James  Davenport and Benjamin F. Stewart, were detailed to remain.

 

Discouraging Reports

 

In this region of the country the pioneers were constantly meeting with trappers  and traders who were familiar with the Salt Lake Valley. They all gave  discouraging reports of that region and advised the Saints to locate elsewhere.  They spoke more favorably of the Cache, the Bear and other valleys to the north.  Among those giving this adverse advice were Major Moses Harris, Thomas L. Smith  and Colonel James Bridger. The latter informed President Young that he deemed it  unwise to bring a large colony into the Great Basin until it was demonstrated  that it would be possible to raise grain there. He stated that he would give a  thousand dollars if he knew an ear of corn could ripen in Salt Lake Valley.  Undaunted by these unfavorable reports President Young with his band of pioneers  pushed on with great vigor.

 

The Meeting with Samuel Brannan

 

Wednesday, June 30, 1847, the pioneers arrived at the Green River. The water was  very high, with a swift current. After dinner the brethren commenced making two  rafts with which to cross the stream. While they were at work Samuel Brannan  came into the camp, having come from San Francisco. He had traveled around Cape  Horn, from New York to California, with a company of emigrating Saints in the  year 1846. Brannan and two others had braved the dangers of the mountains  through deep snows to reach the camp of the pioneers, having left on the 4th of  April. He brought with him several numbers of his paper, The California Star,  and the latest news of the Mormon Battalion. He labored diligently to get  President Young to continue on to California and not remain in the barren wastes  of the Rocky Mountains. President Young, however, was following the inspiration  of the Lord, and not the wisdom of man. The Lord had pointed out to him as he  had to the Prophet Joseph Smith in 1842 that the place of settlement for the  Latter-day Saints was in the “midst of the Rocky Mountains.”

 

An Uninviting Country

 

It should be remembered that in 1847, the Salt Lake Valley was desolate and  uninviting. There was little vegetation save the stubby growth of salt-grass,  grease-wood and sage that covered the valley, and the few willows and cottonwood  trees that stood on the banks of the canyon streams. At that time the Rocky  Mountain region and a large part of the plains to the east were little known.  The few emigrants who had passed through the Great Basin had made haste to get  beyond and into the more inviting parts on the Pacific coast. This vast  inter-mountain country was the haunt of the trapper and the hunter, to whom the  possibilities and resources of the arid west were not even a dream. The valleys  of the mountains had been occupied for upwards of twenty years by these nomads  of the desert, who wandered from place to place hunting and trapping, content in  the belief that the wild and primitive condition which then prevailed must so  remain forever.

 

As late as 1843, two years before the exodus, the opinion held by the majority  in the United States was that the whole territory of the Rocky Mountains was not  worth a “pinch of snuff.” Such was the expression made by Senator George H.  McDuffie, of South Carolina, in the senate that year. Discussing the settlement  of Oregon, he said: “Who are to go there, along the line of military posts, and  take possession of the only part of the territory fit to occupy that part upon  the sea coast, a strip less than one hundred miles in width. Why, sir, of what  use will this be for agricultural purposes? I would not for that purpose give a  pinch of snuff for the whole territory. I wish to God we did not own it.”4

 

The inspiration which came to the Prophet Joseph Smith in 1842 and even earlier  and which was converted into reality by Brigham Young shines forth with  increased lustre when placed in contrast with the united opinions of all those  who were familiar with the land in the year 1847.

 

Arrival of the Battalion Members from Pueblo

 

July 1, 1847, the men commenced ferrying over Green River which was continued  until Saturday the 3rd. In the evening of Saturday, the camp was called together  and the men who desired to journey back to meet their families who were on the  plains and supposed to be several hundred miles in the rear, were given that  privilege. Five volunteered to return. President Young, Heber C. Kimball and  Willard Richards accompanied the five brethren back to the ferry on Green River.  Here they saw a group of thirteen men, with horses and baggage on the opposite  side of the river ready to be ferried across. They were members of the Mormon  Battalion journeying from Pueblo. They were given three cheers and President  Young “led out in exclaiming Hosannah! Hosannah! Give glory to God and the Lamb,  Amen!” These men were in pursuit of horse thieves who had stolen several of the  battalion horses, of which they had recovered all but one or two. They reported  to President Young that the Pueblo detachment of the battalion was within seven  days’ march of the Green River. It was decided that as the members of the  battalion had not been discharged nor had they received their pay, Samuel  Brannan and Thomas S. Williams should return with them to California to pilot  them on the way. Brannan was greatly disappointed at the decision of President  Young to locate in the Salt Lake Valley.

 

President Young and companions returned to the pioneer camp with twelve of the  members of the battalion, Sunday afternoon, July 4. One of the soldiers, William  Walker, had decided to accompany the five brethren back to the camps of the  Saints. Sunday was spent by the pioneers in religious service under the  direction of the bishops.

 

Orson Pratt’s Vanguard

 

Monday, July 5, 1847, the company took up their march and arrived at Fort  Bridger on the 7th, where they camped. Here they repaired the wagons and shod  their horses, preparatory for the rough mountain travel which would lead them to  the end of their journey. July 9, they continued on to the head of Echo Canyon,  which was reached on the 12th. At this place President Young was taken ill with  mountain fever. He ordered Elder Orson Pratt to take a company and precede the  main body of pioneers into the Salt Lake Valley. This advance company,  consisting of twenty-five wagons and forty-two men, traveled down Echo Canyon,  with instructions to look for the trail of the Reed-Donner party.5 This they  found after some difficulty, for it was almost obliterated. It was necessary for  a detachment with proper tools to go on ahead and construct a road for the  wagons. From this point on to their destination, they encountered the most  difficult portion of the road over which they traveled. They passed down into  East Canyon and over Big and Little Mountains into Emigration Canyon, which they  named “Last Creek.” July 21, President Brigham Young sent Erastus Snow to meet  Orson Pratt with a message for him to bear northward after entering the valley,  and select the first convenient place for plowing and planting seed. The reason  for this apparent haste was that the season was well advanced and every moment  counted in the growing of their seed. Elder Snow overtook Orson Pratt on the  afternoon of the 21st and together they entered the valley, with one horse  between them. Seeing what looked like a field of waving grain to the south, they  first journeyed in that direction only to find that they saw canes growing near  the banks of what is known today as Mill Creek. Remembering the words of  President Young, they retraced their steps and passed on to the north. When near  the mouth of Emigration Canyon, Erastus Snow discovered he had lost his coat  which was thrown over the saddle and he went back to find it, while Orson Pratt  continued on to the north to the present site of Salt Lake City. The following  day others of the advance company entered the valley.

 

The Land Dedicated

 

July 23, they moved north and camped on what was subsequently known as the  Eighth ward square, now occupied by the Salt Lake City and County Building.  Orson Pratt called the camp together, dedicated the land and invoked a blessing  on the seed they were about to plant. The ground was found so hard that the  first attempt to plow was unsuccessful, and several plow-points were broken. By  placing a dam in the stream (City Creek) they soaked the ground and in the  course of a few days several acres were plowed and planted. The season being so  late nothing came of their planting, save the garnering of potatoes about the  size of a pea or a walnut, which served for seed the following year and produced  a good crop.

 

“This is the Place”

 

On the 24th of July, 1847, President Brigham Young with the main body of the  pioneers, entered the valley. He was resting in a carriage driven by Elder  Wilford Woodruff and as they emerged from the canyon and pulled up onto a ridge  President Young, who was ill, requested Elder Woodruff to turn his carriage  around so that he could look upon the valley. This was done, and President Young  gazed in silence for a few moments. Then with an expression of satisfaction, he  said, “This is the place, drive on.” They entered into the valley and camped  with the members who had preceded them. They had found the promised land and a  resting place for their weary feet, where they could fulfil the predictions of  the Prophet Joseph Smith, and become a mighty people in the midst of the Rocky  Mountains.

 

Notes

 

 1. Outcasts from “civilization,” with little to eat and little to wear; with few  expressions of sympathy, and less help extended in their direction, it was only  natural that the Saints on the plains at times would be despondent. President  Young constantly labored to cheer and strengthen them. Shortly before the  departure of the Pioneer band, he requested Elder William Clayton to write  something that would encourage the people. Within two hours Elder Clayton had  written the following remarkable hymn, and set it to the music of “All is Well,”  an old English tune:

 

 Come, come, ye Saints, no toil nor labor fear;

 

But with joy wend your way.

 

Though hard to you this journey may appear,

 

Grace shall be as your day.

 

’Tis better far for us to strive

 

Our useless cares from us to drive;

 

Do this, and joy your hearts will swell

 

All is well! All is well!

 

. . .

 

And should we die before our journey’s through,

 

Happy day! All is well!

 

We then are free from toil and sorrow, too;

 

With the just we shall dwell!

 

But if our lives are spared again

 

To see the Saints their rest obtain,

 

Oh, how we’ll make this chorus swell

 

All is well! All is well!

 

2.  Elders Orson Hyde, Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor had been sent to England,  after the exodus from Nauvoo, to set the British Mission in order. Elders Reuben  Hedlock and Thomas Ward, who were in charge, had misappropriated the funds of  “The Joint Stock Company,” an organization which had been formed for the purpose  of assisting the Saints of the British Isles to emigrate. The three apostles  took charge of affairs and soon had the mission again in a flourishing  condition. Early in 1847, they again returned to the United States, Elders Pratt  and Taylor preceding Elder Hyde, who remained to install Elder Orson Spencer as  president of that mission. Elder Orson Spencer, a man of culture and superior  education, performed an excellent work and under his ministry the mission  flourished.

 

3.  Luke S. Johnson, formerly of the council of the apostles, came to Nauvoo in  1846 in a repentant spirit, and asked to be reinstated in the Church. He was  baptized and was forced to leave that place with the body of the Saints. He was  chosen as one of the pioneer band to come in advance to the Salt Lake Valley. In  the year 1858, he settled at St. Johns, Tooele County, where he was ordained a  bishop. He died in Salt Lake City, December 9, 1861.

 

4.  Congressional Globe, 27th Congress, 3rd Session, pp. 198 through 201.

 

5.  The Reed-Donner party, comprised seventy-eight men, women and children,  under the direction of James F. Reed and George Donner, who left Independence in  May, 1846, for California. They came via Fort Bridger, Echo and East Canyons  through Emigration and westward through the Salt Lake and Tooele Valleys, around  the south end of Salt Lake. Delayed by many misfortunes, they were caught in the  snows in the Sierras in the winter of 1846, where many of them perished. Near  the close of that year several of the ill-fated party put on snowshoes and  crossed to the Sacramento Valley for relief. A relief expedition was sent back  and found that the survivors had been living for weeks on the flesh of their  dead, like cannibals. Thirty-nine of the original company had perished.

 

 Chapter 40 In “the Land of Promise”.1847

 

The First Sabbath in the Valley

 

July 25, 1847, was the Sabbath. It was a pleasant day, and at ten o’clock the  pioneers met in worship in the circle of their encampment. Elders George A.  Smith, Heber C. Kimball and Ezra T. Benson were the speakers. They expressed  gratitude for the blessings of the Lord during their travels to this promised  land. Not a soul had died on the toilsome journey. In the afternoon another  service was held and the sacrament was administered. Elders Wilford Woodruff,  Orson Pratt and Willard Richards were the speakers at this service. The  principal address was given by Elder Pratt who took for his text Isaiah 52:7 through 8:  “How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good  tidings; that publisheth peace,” etc. He stated that the predictions of the  prophets were now being fulfilled.

 

President Young’s Advice

 

President Young was too feeble to make any extended remarks, but near the close  of the services he gave some very important advice. Elder Wilford Woodruff made  a synopsis of his remarks as follows: “He told the brethren that they must not  work on Sunday; that they would lose five times as much as they would gain by  it. None were to hunt on that day; and there should not any man dwell among us  who would not observe these rules. They might go and dwell where they pleased,  but should not dwell with us. He also said that no man who came here should buy  any land; that he had none to sell, but every man should have his land measured  out to him for city and farming purposes. He might till it as he pleased, but he  must be industrious and take care of it.” Later, instructions were given that  there should be no private ownership of the streams, and only dead timber should  be used for fuel, as trees were none too plentiful and should be conserved.  These regulations were adopted by the community in justice to all, for it was  expected that within a very short time the Saints who were then on the  plains the exiles from Nauvoo, some twenty thousand in number and others coming  from various states and from Europe, would be gathered to the Rocky Mountains.

 

Explorations of the Valley

 

Naturally the pioneers were impatient to explore the surrounding country. Their  first duty was to plant the seed they brought with them. Plowing began on the  23rd and continued during the 24th. Monday morning, July 26th, a number of  exploring companies were sent out, including the eight apostles in the camp and  Elders Albert Carrington, William Clayton, John Brown and Joseph Matthews. The  two latter crossed the river, which was called the Utah Outlet and later the  Western Jordan, and ascended the mountains on the west of the valley. They  reported, on their return, that the land on that side of the valley was not as  good as the land on the east side. Some of the brethren penetrated some of the  canyons where they found timber of good quality. President Young, Wilford  Woodruff and others of the brethren visited the hot and also the warm springs  at the north end of the valley, and made some observations. Their explorations  continued for several days. On the 27th of July, they explored the Tooele  Valley. On the way they had a bath in the lake and were much surprised at the  buoyancy of the water. That night they camped at Black Rock and the following  day they traveled about ten miles south along the eastern base of the Oquirrh  Mountains, where, in the main, they found a barren country and very little  water. Orson Pratt ascended the mountain where he obtained a view of Utah Lake,  which he judged to be about twenty miles away. Striking eastward across the  valley they returned to camp. On this trip they saw about one hundred goats,  sheep and antelope. They returned satisfied that the spot where the pioneers had  camped was the best on which their city could be built.

 

A Place for an Ensign

 

On the 26th, they also ascended the mountain above the hot springs to get a  better view of the surrounding country, and by aid of their glasses were able to  discern the Utah Outlet at the point of the mountain, where it enters the Salt  Lake Valley on the south. A number of streams were also seen flowing from the  mountains into the valley. As they stood upon the mountain President Young  remarked that it would be a good place to lift up an ensign, referring to  Isaiah’s prophecy; so they named it “Ensign Peak,” by which name it has since  been known. In later years a flagstaff was placed upon it.

 

The Building of a City

 

After returning from their explorations on the 28th, a council was held in the  evening and it was decided to build a city. Some of the brethren suggested that  they explore further before deciding on a site for a settlement. President Young  replied that he was willing that they should explore until they were satisfied,  but every time a party went out and returned he believed they would agree that  this was the spot on which they should locate.

 

It was decided that the city should be laid out in blocks of ten acres each with  streets eight rods wide running at right angles. The blocks were to be divided  into lots containing one and one-quarter acres each, with exceptions in certain  parts where the lay of the land would be inconvenient for such arrangement. The  houses were to be of uniform distance from the street and only one house to a  lot. “Upon every alternate block four houses were to be built on the east, and  four on the west side of the square, but none on the north and south sides. But  the blocks intervening were to have four houses on the north and four on the  south, but none on the east and west sides. In this plan there will be no houses  fronting each other on the opposite sides of the streets, while those on the  same side will be about eight rods apart, having gardens running back twenty  rods to the center of the block.” Such was their description. There were to be  four public squares of ten acres each in various parts of the city. “Let every  man,” said President Young, “cultivate his own lot and set out every kind of  fruit and shade tree and beautify the city.” This plan was laid before the camp  and approved unanimously.

 

The Place for the Temple

 

During the westward journey the building of a temple was a constant theme. On  the evening of the 28th of July, President Young and the apostles with Thomas  Bullock, the clerk, walked from their camp northward to a spot between the forks  of City Creek, and there President Young designated a site for the building of a  temple. Waving his hand he said: “Here is the forty acres for the temple, and  the city can be laid out perfectly square north and south, east and west.”

 

Orson Pratt’s Survey

 

The survey of the city was made by Orson Pratt. His line was on the southeast  corner of the Temple Block. Beginning at that point the city was marked out into  blocks of ten acres each. It was decided by the brethren that instead of using  forty acres for the site it would be better to have that block conform in size  with the others. According to Orson Pratt’s calculations, the latitude of the  north boundary of the Temple Block was 40 degrees, 35 minutes and 34 seconds.  The longitude was 111 degrees, 26 minutes and 34 seconds west of Greenwich. The  altitude was 4,300 feet above sea level. Later government observations varied  from these of Elder Pratt but slightly.

 

Arrival of the Battalion and Mississippi Members

 

In addition to the twelve members of the battalion and the advance company of  Mississippi Saints who came into the valley with the pioneers,1 the detachments  of the battalion who wintered at Pueblo under the command of Captain James Brown  and Nelson Higgins, together with the main body of the Mississippi Saints,  entered the Salt Lake Valley, under direction of Captain James Brown, July 29,  1847. This increased the number in the camp to about four hundred souls. They  brought with them about sixty wagons, one hundred head of horses and mules and  three hundred head of cattle.

 

Immediately after their arrival the battalion members built a bowery, the first  structure in the valley in which public meetings could be held with some degree  of comfort, and the worshipers receive protection from the excessive heat of the  sun.

 

Renewal of Covenants

 

Having been unable to live in peace in former habitations because of  persecutions of wicked men, the Saints now rejoiced at the prospect before them.  It was proposed by President Young and the apostles that they renew their  covenants with the Lord and solemnly promise that they would henceforth keep his  commandments in this land where they were free from religious persecution. In  the humility and thankfulness of their hearts for their deliverance, the  apostles set the example. August 6, President Young was baptized, and each of  the apostles were likewise baptized in turn. This was not done as an  acknowledgment that their former baptism was not efficacious, or that they had  broken covenants formerly received, but as an acknowledgment before the Lord of  their willingness to serve him henceforth and forever. To this proposition all  the camp of Israel said Amen, and the ordinance of baptism was administered to  all.

 

The First Births and Death in the Colony

 

The first birth in the pioneer camp was that of a daughter to John and Catharine  Campbell Steele, August 9, 1847. The father was a member of the battalion and he  and his wife had arrived in the camp but a few days before. The child was named  Young Elizabeth Steele, in honor of President Brigham Young and Queen Elizabeth.  Two days later the colony was called upon to mourn because of the death of  Milton H. Therlkill, three years old, and son of George W. and Jane Therlkill,  of the Mississippi company. The child had wandered from the camp and was drowned  in City Creek. A few days later (August 15th) a daughter was born to these same  parents. This was the second birth in the colony.

 

The “Old Fort”

 

Three days after the Pioneers arrived in the valley, Indians of the Ute and  Shoshone tribes commenced visiting the camp, begging and endeavoring to trade  for guns and ammunition, and incidentally to steal when opportunity afforded. On  one occasion a fight ensued and the Shoshones killed a Ute who had stolen one of  their horses. President Young instructed the Saints that they should trade no  more with the Indians, who were manifesting a spirit of jealousy because the  pioneers treated one tribe the same as the other.

 

As a means of protection against Indian raids and thefts, it was decided to  build a fort, or stockade, on one of the city ten-acre squares. The site chosen  is now known as Pioneer Park, three blocks south and three west of the Temple  Block. At a meeting held August 1, 1847, it was decided that the enclosure  should be built of logs and sundried bricks (adobes). The brethren immediately  went to work preparing the timbers and adobes for this purpose. August 10, work  started on the stockade. The walls were twenty-seven inches thick and nine feet  high on the outer side. It was built as a continuation of huts joined together  in rectangular form around the outside of the ten acres on which it stood. The  east side was built of logs, and the three other sides of adobe walls. The roofs  slanted but slightly inward, and were made of brush covered with earth. Each  house had a loop-hole facing the outside and a door and windows facing the  interior. The main entrances, which were on the east and west sides of the  stockade, were carefully guarded by heavy gates which were locked at night. In  the winter and spring months the snow and rain caused the mud to leak through  the roofs, to the great discomfort of the inhabitants. Wagon covers, and other  articles which would shed moisture, were utilized, to protect beds and bedding.  Notwithstanding the discomforts and inconveniences of life under such  conditions, the Saints spent many pleasant hours within the walls of their  temporary homes. Two additional blocks were joined to the original fort, one on  the north and one on the south, to accommodate later arrivals in the valley.  These were designated as the North Fort and the South Fort, and were similar in  construction to the first, or Old Fort, as it was called. During the first  winter, schools were taught in the fort by Julian Moses and Miss Mary Ann  Dillworth.

 

Captain Brown’s Journey to the Coast

 

A question had arisen regarding the Pueblo detachment of the Mormon Battalion.  They were under orders to march to the Pacific coast, but the term of their  enlistment had expired. Should they go to the coast to be mustered out of  service, or should that duty be performed by their company officers? After some  deliberation it was decided that they should be mustered out of service, and  that Captain James Brown with a small company should go to California and report  to the army officers there, and with a power of attorney from each of the men,  draw their pay. Captain Brown, with several members of the battalion, departed  for San Francisco, August 9, piloted by Samuel Brannan. Brannan returned to  California greatly disappointed because President Young would not hearken to  his counsel and continue on to the coast, where he thought conditions for  permanent settlement were more favorable than the desolate valleys of the  mountains. Captain Brown carried with him a message from President Young to the  battalion members on the coast, advising all who had no families to remain in  California through the winter and obtain work, and in the spring come to the  Salt Lake Valley with their earnings. Captain Brown’s company went by way of the  northern route and were accompanied as far as Fort Hall, by Jesse C. Little,  Joseph Matthews, John Brown and others, who explored the Cache and Weber  valleys. These brethren returned with favorable reports.

 

Special Conference in the Valley

 

Sunday, August 22, 1847, a special conference was held in the Salt Lake Valley.  It was agreed to fence the city, and such portions of adjacent lands as might be  deemed proper for cultivation, thus affording protection from cattle. “By this  means,” said President Young, “we can raise thousands of bushels of grain next  season for ourselves and also some to sustain those who shall come after us. I  would rather fence a block of ten acres, and have a crop, than plant a hundred  acres for the cattle to destroy.”

 

It was decided that a presidency and a high council be appointed to preside over  the Saints in the valley. Elder John Smith, uncle of the Prophet Joseph Smith,  who was at the time on the plains, was chosen as president. President Young  moved that “we call this place ‘The Great Salt Lake City, of the Great Basin of  North America,’” and that the post office be called “The Great Basin Post  Office.” Elder Heber C. Kimball moved that the river running west of the  settlement be called “The Western Jordan.” Some of the creeks were also named as  follows: City Creek, Red Butte Creek, Canyon Creek (afterwards Emigration Creek)  and Big Canyon Creek (Parley’s Creek). Those streams farther to the south were  not named at that time.

 

At the close of the services Elder Heber C. Kimball remarked: “This is a  paradise to me, and one of the loveliest places I ever beheld. I hope none of us  will be left alive to pollute this land. I would rather die than act as  inconsistent as many have in times past.”

 

The Return of the Pioneers

 

President Young felt great anxiety for the companies of Saints who were on the  plains wending their way to the valley. There was much to be done in order to  care properly for those who had already arrived, protect them from hostile  Indians and prepare for the coming winter season. This labor required his  attention and that of the leading brethren for some days. However, it was deemed  necessary that a company start back at once to meet the oncoming immigrants.  Monday, August 2, 1847, it was decided in a council meeting, that Elder Ezra T.  Benson with a company of horsemen should start back immediately. About noon on  that day this company departed. They carried instructions from President Young  to obtain the names of all who were in the several camps, together with the  number of wagons, horses, oxen and other animals; also to ascertain the  condition of the health and needs of the immigrants, so that assistance might be  rendered where necessary. August 16 and 17, a company selected from the original  pioneers and battalion started back for this purpose. This company consisted of  seventy-one men, with thirty-three wagons, fourteen mules and ninety-two yoke of  oxen. It was divided into two divisions with Tunis Rappleyee and Shadrach Roundy  as captains. August 26, President Young and the apostles started on their return  to Winter Quarters. This company consisted of one hundred and eight men,  thirty-six wagons, seventy-one horses and forty-nine mules. They passed a number  of trains on the way to the valley, totaling more than fifteen hundred men,  women and children, with five hundred and sixty wagons and five thousand head  of stock. Among these immigrants were Elders Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor of  the council of the apostles, who were in charge of the companies.

 

President Young’s Instructions and Blessing

 

President Young arrived at Winter Quarters, October 31, after an eventful  journey back across the plains. When the company arrived within a mile of Winter  Quarters, President Young called them together and made the following remarks:

 

 “Brethren, I will say to the pioneers, I wish you would receive my thanks for  your kindness and willingness to obey orders. I am satisfied with you; you have  done well. We have accomplished more than we expected. The one hundred and  forty-three men who started, some of them sick, are all well. Not a man has  died; and we have not lost a horse, mule or ox, except through carelessness. The  blessings of the Lord have been with us. If the brethren are satisfied with me  and the Twelve, please signify it with uplifted hands. (All hands were raised.)  I feel to bless you in the name of the Lord God of Israel. You are dismissed to  go to your homes.”

 

The company then drove into the town of Winter Quarters in order, arriving about  one hour before sunset. The streets of the town were filled with eager people  and the weary pioneers rejoiced once more to behold their wives, children and  friends.

 

Organization of a Stake of Zion

 

Sunday, October 3, 1847, the Saints in the Salt Lake Valley met in conference  and transacted business which had been proposed by President Young and the  apostles before their departure. “Uncle” John Smith, who had been chosen before  his arrival, was sustained as president of the Salt Lake Stake of Zion, with  Charles C. Rich and John Young as his counselors. Members of the high council  were also chosen as follows: Henry G. Sherwood, Thomas Grover, Levi Jackman,  John Murdock, Daniel Spencer, Lewis Abbot, Ira Eldredge, Edson Whipple, Shadrach  Roundy, John Vance, Willard Snow and Abraham O. Smoot.

 

Charles C. Rich was also selected as chief military commander under the  direction of the stake authorities. Albert Carrington was selected to act as  clerk and historian of the city, and John Van Cott as marshal.

 

Population at the Close of 1847

 

The last company to enter the valley in 1847 arrived in October. The several  companies were listed by Thomas Bullock as follows: President Young’s pioneer  company, 148; the Mississippi company, 47; Mormon Battalion, 210; Daniel  Spencer’s company, 204; Parley P. Pratt’s company, 198; Abraham O. Smoot’s  company, 139; Charles C. Rich’s company, 130; George B. Wallace’s company, 198;  Edward Hunter’s company, 155; Joseph Home’s company, 197; Joseph B. Noble’s  company, 171; W. Snow’s company, 148; and Jedediah M. Grant’s company, the last  of the season, 150. The total being 2,095 souls for the year.

 

Notes

 

1.  It is quite generally understood that there were three women who entered the  Salt Lake Valley with the pioneers in July, 1847. The fact has been overlooked  by many that there were other noble women, besides these three who accompanied  President Young across the plains, who braved the dangers and hardships of the  journey to the west. Among the Mississippi Saints who met the pioneers at Fort  Laramie and journeyed with them from that point into the Salt Lake Valley, were  the following: Elizabeth Crow, Harriet Crow, Elizabeth J. Crow, Ira Vinda Exene  Crow, Irmaninda Almarene Crow and Marilla Jane Therlkill.

 

 Chapter 41 Organization of the Presidency. Church Activities. 1847 through 1849

 

Activities on the Missouri

 

As soon as the apostles arrived at Winter Quarters they held council meetings  almost daily, which continued during the months of November and December, for  there was much to be done. The Saints had been greatly blessed in their crops  and a good and abundant harvest had been gathered. Instructions were given that  all the Church records should be gathered and prepared for removal to the Salt  Lake Valley. The poor among the Saints were also to be gathered, and  instructions were given to the people at Garden Grove to move to Winter Quarters  in the spring. Elder Jesse C. Little was called again to preside in the Eastern  States and Elder John Brown, who had led the Mississippi Saints to Pueblo, and  later was one of the pioneers, was called to take charge of the work in the  Southern States. November 8, it was decided to vacate Winter Quarters and move  to the east bank of the Missouri, and there make a settlement for the members of  the Church who were not able to continue to the west. All who could leave in the  spring for the west would be called upon to do so. Elder Hyde, who had been  presiding at Winter Quarters, reported that action had been taken against Bishop  George Miller and James Emmett, who, contrary to counsel, had moved to Texas  instead of continuing on to the Rocky Mountains. This action was approved by the  council of the twelve. Elder Orson Pratt was chosen to go to England and preside  in the British Mission and Elder Wilford Woodruff to Canada. Some twenty-seven  elders were called to various mission fields. November 22, the brethren wrote a  letter to Oliver Cowdery, whose heart had softened, exhorting him to be  baptized.

 

Organization of the First Presidency

 

From the martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch Hyrum Smith in 1844,  until December, 1847, the Twelve Apostles, with President Brigham Young at their  head, were sustained as the presiding council of the Church. On the return  journey to Winter Quarters from the Salt Lake Valley, the apostles conversed on  the subject of reorganizing the First Presidency. December 5, 1847, they met in  council at the home of Orson Hyde, on the east bank of the Missouri River, when  this and other important matters were considered. There were present at this  meeting: President Brigham Young, and Elders Heber C. Kimball, Orson Hyde, Orson  Pratt, Willard Richards, Wilford Woodruff, George A. Smith, Amasa M. Lyman and  Ezra T. Benson. Elders Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor were in the Salt Lake  Valley, and Lyman Wight, who had failed to accompany the Church to the West, was  in Texas. Elders Lyman and Benson had been called into the council of the twelve  to succeed William Smith and John E. Page, who had been excommunicated because  of insubordination and rebellion against authority. Each of the brethren present  expressed his views in turn in relation to the matter of the First Presidency,  after which, on motion of Elder Orson Hyde, Brigham Young was unanimously  sustained as President of the Church “with authority to nominate” his two  counselors. He chose Elder Heber C. Kimball, as his first and Willard Richards,  as his second counselor. The choosing of Heber C. Kimball, was the fulfilment of  a prediction by the Patriarch Hyrum Smith. In a patriarchal blessing given to  Elder Kimball March 9, 1842, Hyrum Smith said: “You shall be blessed with a  fulness and shall be not one whit behind the chiefest; as an apostle you shall  stand in the presence of God to judge the people; and as a prophet you shall  attain to the honor of the three.” The following day they selected “Uncle” John  Smith to be “the Patriarch over the whole Church.” Elders Orson Hyde and Ezra T.  Benson were appointed to go east and Amasa M. Lyman to the north to procure  means to help the Saints to emigrate the next season. The apostles also ordained  Luke S. Johnson an elder.

 

The Sustaining Vote of the Saints

 

A general conference of the Church on the Missouri was held December 24 to 27,  1847, on the Iowa side of the Missouri River. A large log tabernacle had been  constructed which would seat nearly one thousand persons. On the last day of  this conference the First Presidency, Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball and  Willard Richards, chosen by the apostles on the 4th of the month, were  unanimously sustained by the vote of the Saints. John Smith was also sustained  as the “Patriarch over all the Church.” The action of this conference was  subsequently ratified by the members of the Church in Iowa and in the Salt Lake  Valley, at conferences held in April, 1848; and in the British Isles at a  conference held in Manchester, August 14, 1848.

 

The day before the conference convened (Dec. 23), a general epistle was issued  by the apostles to all the members of the Church, “dispersed throughout the  earth.” This was a very important epistle portraying the movements of the Church  since the exodus from Nauvoo, and declaring the intentions and prospects of the  people for the immediate future. All the members of the Church who had been  driven from their homes were instructed to gather to the site selected for their  settlement in the Great Basin. Others in the United States, Canada and Great  Britain, were likewise counseled to gather, as circumstances would permit. They  were to bring with them seeds of every kind “everything that grows upon the face  of the whole earth that will please the eye, gladden the heart, or cheer the  soul of man.” They were also to bring “the best stock of beasts, birds and  fowl,” and tools of every kind. Advice in relation to the building of Zion; the  preaching of the Gospel; the duties of parents; the building of the temple, and  other matters of grave concern to the members of the Church, were also set  forth, for their comfort and guidance, during those days of reconstruction and  great trial.

 

Kanesville Pottawattamie County

 

Following the advice of President Young, the Saints residing at Winter Quarters  moved across the Missouri River to the Bluffs on the Iowa side. This country was  called the “Pottawattamie country,” because it was inhabited by a tribe of  Indians by that name. These Indians had been removed by the government, a few  months before, to another part, leaving the Saints in sole occupancy of the  land. There were no settlements within many miles of the Latter-day Saints.  President Young deemed it wise that the Saints should hold these lands for some  time, in the interests of immigration, and therefore many who were not prepared  to go west, and some who preferred to remain, made this place their home.

 

The settlement established by them was in what was called “Miller’s Hollow.”  They named it “Kanesville,” in honor of Colonel Thomas L. Kane, who had been  instrumental in securing for them privileges from the government, and who had  shown his friendship on many occasions. Elder Orson Hyde, who was left in charge  after the departure of President Young and the majority of the Saints, published  a paper, the Frontier Guardian, which continued under his editorship for three  years. When the Saints residing there were instructed to join the main body of  the Latter-day Saints in the West, the paper was sold and the members of the  Church left their holdings for other people.

 

The Iowa Legislature in 1847, provided for the creation of counties in the  Pottawattamie country, whenever the judge of that district “should decree that  the public good required it.” The Saints petitioned for a county organization,  and learned that the judge had already taken steps in that direction. The County  of Pottawattamie was therefore organized, and was officered by members of the  Church. Other settlers began to arrive, after the Saints had made of the place a  pleasant habitation. When the call came for the members of the Church to “arise  and come home” in 1852, they deserted Kanesville and the name was soon changed  to Council Bluffs, by which name it has since been known.

 

President Young’s Second Trip Across the Plains

 

During the month of May, 1848, preparations were made for the departure of the  main body of the Saints on the Missouri River. On the 9th of that month the  first company of twenty-two wagons departed and camped on the Elkhorn. On the  26th, President Young left Winter Quarters and took command of the camps and led  them across the plains. This was to be his last trip, for his duties henceforth  were to be among the settlements in the Rocky Mountains. During the month of  June Presidents Young and Kimball commenced their journey at the head of camps  consisting of over six hundred wagons and nearly two thousand souls, with their  accompanying goods and chattels. President Willard Richards followed in the  month of July with another camp of one hundred and sixty-nine wagons and over  five hundred souls. These camps traveled in accordance with the regulations  adopted at the beginning among the pioneers. From this time forth, for many  years, companies of Latter-day Saints might be seen crossing the plains, coming  from Europe and the various states of the Union. Presidents Young and Kimball  arrived in the valley in September, and President Richards arrived early in  October, 1848.

 

Plague of the Crickets

 

The season was so far advanced when the pioneers arrived in the summer of 1847  that little resulted from the planting, except to obtain some seed potatoes.  Their salvation depended on the success of their crops in 1848. They had built  three saw mills in the mountains and one grist mill. Their planted fields  consisted of five thousand one hundred and thirty-three acres, of which nearly  nine hundred acres were planted in winter wheat. With the aid of irrigation all  things looked favorable, and it appeared that there would be a fruitful harvest.  The Saints were happy and their prospects were bright. They gave thanks to the  Lord and in humility desired to serve him. In the months of May and June they  were menaced by a danger as bad as the persecution of mobs. Myriads of crickets  came down the mountain sides into the valley, like a vast army marshalled for  battle, and began to destroy the fields. From one they would pass on to another,  and in a few moments leave a field as barren as a desert waste. Something had to  be done, or the inhabitants must perish. The community was aroused and every  soul entered the unequal conflict. Trenches were dug around the fields and  filled with water, in the hope of stopping the ravages of the pest, but without  result. Fire was equally unavailing. The attempt was made to beat them back with  clubs, brooms and other improvised weapons, but nothing that man could do was  able to stop the steady onward march of the voracious crickets. The settlers  were helpless before them.

 

The Miracle of the Gulls

 

When all seemed lost, and the Saints were giving up in despair, the heavens  became clouded with gulls, which hovered over the fields, uttering their  plaintive scream. Was this a new evil come upon them? Such were the thoughts of  some who expected that what the crickets left the gulls would destroy; but not  so, the gulls in countless battalions descended and began to devour the  crickets, waging a battle for the preservation of the crops. They ate, they  gorged upon the pest, and then flying to the streams would drink and vomit and  again return to the battle front. This took place day by day until the crickets  were destroyed. The people gave thanks, for this was to them a miracle. Surely  the Lord was merciful and had sent the gulls as angels of mercy for their  salvation.1 Since that time the gull has been looked upon by the Latter-day  Saints almost as a sacred deliverer. Laws have been passed for the protection of  these birds, and the wanton killing of one would be considered a crime of great  magnitude.

 

The Feast of the Harvest

 

The first harvest in the valley was none too plentiful; however, enough had been  raised to tide over the season with the oncoming and constantly increasing  population. It is doubtful if ever since then a harvest has filled the hearts of  the people with such joy and satisfaction. With thankful hearts, August 10,  1848, a public “harvest feast” was celebrated in the valley. It had been  demonstrated that abundant crops could be raised with proper care and  cultivation. Large sheaves of wheat, rye, barley, and other products of the  soil, were placed on exhibition, and the people celebrated with music, song,  speeches, prayer and thanksgiving.

 

The Return of Oliver Cowdery

 

For some time the Spirit of the Lord had been striving with Oliver Cowdery.  Finally he decided to accept the admonition of the apostles given November 22,  1847, and again unite with the Church. He came to Kanesville with his family, in  October, 1848, and asked to be received as a member in the Church. He had been  absent for over ten years. A special conference was held October 21, 1848, at  which Oliver Cowdery arose and confessed the error of his ways and gave his  testimony as follows:

 

 “Friends and Brethren: My name is Cowdery, Oliver Cowdery. In the early history  of this Church I stood identified with her, and one in her councils. True it is  that the gifts and callings of God are without repentance; not because I was  better than the rest of mankind was I called; but, to fulfil the purposes of  God, he called me to a high and holy calling.

 

“I wrote with my own pen the entire Book of Mormon (save a few pages), as it  fell from the lips of the Prophet Joseph Smith, as he translated it by the gift  and power of God, by the means of the Urim and Thummim, or, as it is called by  that book, ‘holy interpreters.’ I beheld with my eyes, and handled with my  hands, the gold plates from which it was transcribed. I also saw with my eyes  and handled with my hands the ‘holy interpreters.’ That book is true. Sidney  Rigdon did not write it. Mr. Spaulding did not write it. I wrote it myself as  it fell from the lips of the Prophet. It contains the everlasting Gospel, and  came forth to the children of men in fulfilment of the revelations of John,  where he says he saw an angel come with the everlasting Gospel to preach to  every nation, kindred, tongue and people. It contains principles of salvation;  and if you, my hearers, will walk by its light and obey its precepts, you will  be saved with an everlasting salvation in the kingdom of God on high. Brother  Hyde has just said that it is very important that we keep and walk in the true  channel, in order to avoid the sand-bars. This is true. The channel is here.  The Holy Priesthood is here.

 

“I was present with Joseph when an holy angel from God came down from heaven and  conferred on us, or restored the lesser or Aaronic Priesthood, and said to us at  the same time, that it should remain upon the earth while the earth stands.

 

“I was also present with Joseph when the higher or Melchizedek Priesthood was  conferred by holy angels from on high. This Priesthood we then conferred on each  other, by the will and commandment of God. This Priesthood, as was then  declared, is also to remain upon the earth until the last remnant of time. This  Holy Priesthood, or authority, we then conferred upon many, and is just as good  and valid as though God had done it in person.

 

“I laid my hands upon that man yes, I laid my right hand upon his head (pointing  to Brother Hyde), and I conferred upon him the Priesthood, and he holds that  Priesthood now. He was also called through me, by the prayer of faith, an  apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ.”

 

A few days later Oliver Cowdery appeared before the high council at Kanesville  and requested that he be received into the Church. His case was considered and  on motion of Elder Orson Hyde, who presided at Kanesville, he was received by  baptism. When Oliver appeared before the high council on this occasion he said:

 

 “Brethren, for a number of years I have been separated from you. I now desire to  come back. I wish to come humbly and to be one in your midst, I seek no station.  I only wish to be identified with you. I am out of the Church. I am not a member  of the Church, but I wish to become a member of it. I wish to come in at the  door. I know the door. I have not come here to seek precedence, I come humbly,  and throw myself upon the decisions of this body, knowing, as I do, that its  decisions are right, and should be obeyed.”

 

It was a sad occasion, yet a time of rejoicing to see the former “Second Elder”  of the Church with a contrite spirit desiring fellowship in the Church, and the  association of his former brethren. After his baptism he desired to go to the  Salt Lake Valley and then take a mission to Great Britain. Before doing so he  went to visit with relatives in Missouri, and while there he was taken sick and  died March 3, 1850. He died a happy man with the assurance that his sins had  been forgiven him.

 

The Beginning of New Settlements

 

Explorations of the surrounding valleys commenced as soon as the pioneers  entered the Salt Lake Valley, for the purpose of discovering suitable sites for  other gathering places. In the fall of 1847, Perrigrine Sessions, Samuel Brown  and Hector C. Haight moved into the valley north (Davis County) with herds of  cattle. Sessions camped near the spot where Bountiful was subsequently built,  and there he lived during the winter with part of his family, first in a wagon  and then in a hut. Later he built a permanent home which was the beginning of  Bountiful, formerly called Session’s Settlement. Hector C. Haight went a few  miles farther north and made his camp near the present site of Farmington, on  Big Creek. Later he moved about three miles north on Haight’s Creek, where he  built a cabin where he lived with one of his sons during the winter of 1847 through 48.  In 1848, Daniel Miller, Thomas Grover, Jacob F. Secrist, William Smith and many  others moved to the north and became the first settlers of Bountiful, Farmington  and other towns in Davis County. Early in the year 1848, Captain James Brown,  who had returned from California, entered into negotiations with Miles M.  Goodyear, a trapper and trader, for the purchase of lands where the present city  of Ogden is built. There he located, calling the place Brownsville. John S.  Higbee and others located in Utah valley in 1849. That same year John Rowberry  led a company to Tooele Valley, and Isaac Morley another to Sanpete Valley. In  all these places permanent settlements were established in that year. From this  time on colonization continued, under the direction of President Brigham Young,  and settlements began to spring up throughout the Rocky Mountains, extending  for hundreds of miles. The prophecy of Joseph Smith uttered August 6, 1842, was  realized.

 

Filling Vacancies in the Council of the Twelve

 

The organization of the First Presidency and the disfellowshipment of Lyman  Wight, left four vacancies in the council of the twelve. February 11, 1849, the  First Presidency and apostles met in council at the homes of Elder George B.  Wallace to consider the filling of these vacancies. President Young nominated  Elders Charles C. Rich, Lorenzo Snow, Erastus Snow and Franklin D. Richards for  these positions, which nominations were approved by the apostles. The following  day at the home of Elder Wallace, they were ordained.

 

The Salt Lake Stake

 

In the fall of 1847, the Saints in the Salt Lake Valley were organized into a  stake. It became necessary in 1849, to perfect that organization and make  certain changes. A meeting was called, February 13, 1849, for that purpose.  Elder Daniel Spencer was set apart as president of the Salt Lake Stake,  succeeding Patriarch John Smith, with David Fullmer and Willard Snow as his  counselors. A committee was appointed to lay the city off into ecclesiastical  wards, which later reported, and at another meeting held on the 16th, the high  council was organized and officers chosen for quorums of the Priesthood. The  following division of the valley into wards was decided on: “South of the city  and east of the Jordan River, into four wards: Canyon Creek (Sugar House) Ward,  embracing the five-acre survey and all east of it; Mill Creek Ward, embracing  the ten-acre survey and all east of it; a third ward, embracing the country  between the ten-acre survey and the Cottonwood Creek; and a fourth, embracing  all south of the Cottonwood. West of the Jordan: Canaan Ward; north of the city  and east of the Jordan and the lake, three wards.” These wards included the  settlements as far north as Brownsville (Ogden). At another meeting held on the  22nd of the month the city was divided into nineteen wards of nine blocks each.

 

The Perpetual Emigration Fund

 

Business of great importance was considered at the October general conference of  the Church in 1849. It was decided that the Church should establish a “Perpetual  Emigrating Fund Company,” for the gathering of the poor from the nations of the  earth. The company was duly incorporated and committees were appointed for the  purpose of gathering means for this fund, which were used in bringing great  numbers of the Latter-day Saints to the valleys of the mountains. This continued  for many years. Finally, in 1887, the Perpetual Emigrating Fund Company was  disincorporated by the passage of the Edmunds-Tucker bill, and the funds  escheated to the government for the benefit of the common schools of Utah. It  was intended that those who were aided by this fund should pay back into it the  means advanced for their transportation to the West, that others might be helped  also to emigrate. In this way it would be a perpetual and self-sustaining fund.  Five thousand dollars was the sum of the original contributions, and by its aid  as many as five hundred wagons were furnished some seasons to help the Saints  across the plains.

 

Increased Missionary Activity

 

At this same conference missionaries were called to go to various parts of the  earth as follows: Elder Charles C. Rich, to Southern California (San Bernardino)  to assist Amasa M. Lyman and to succeed him in that field of labor; Addison  Pratt, James Brown and Hyrum H. Blackwell, to the Society Islands; Lorenzo Snow  and Joseph Toronto, to Italy; Erastus Snow and Peter O. Hansen, to Denmark; John  Taylor, Curtis E. Bolton and John Pack, to France; Franklin D. Richards, Joseph  W. Johnson, Joseph W. Young, Job Smith, Haden Church, George B. Wallace, John S.  Higbee and Jacob Gates, to England; and John E. Forsgren, to Sweden. This was a  wonderful undertaking and a remarkable trial of faith, in the days of the  poverty and adversity of the people, when the help of all was needed to build up  settlements and contend with the trials and hardships of pioneer life in this  western country. In the evening of the 6th of October, the presidency set apart  the brethren of the apostles for their fields of labor, and the apostles set  apart the elders who were also called to various mission fields. In a very short  time all were on their way to carry the message of salvation to the world, a  duty the Lord has placed upon the elders of the Church, which is second to no  other. The inspiration of these calls is seen in the fruitful harvest of souls  which was gathered in England, Scandinavia and other lands.

 

An Unexpected Harvest

 

The harvest of 1848 was hardly adequate for the needs of the Saints, for their  numbers had been greatly increased by immigration. The people therefore were  under the necessity of conserving to make ends meet. They were placed on rations  and were forced also to resort to the digging of sego roots, and making greens  from thistles and weeds to eke out an existence. Their clothing was scant, and  most of the men dressed in buckskins, and all materials were made to do extra  service. During these stringent times, President Heber C. Kimball delivered a  discourse in which he uttered a remarkable prophecy. He said that within a short  time “states goods” would be sold in Salt Lake City cheaper than they could be  purchased in St. Louis or New York, and that the people would be supplied with  both food and clothing. Few, if any, who heard these remarks, believed him. Such  a thing in the far west, over a thousand miles from the nearest settlements,  where all goods had to be freighted by team, seemed an impossibility. Yet the  prophecy was literally fulfilled.

 

In the summer of 1849, gold seekers on their way to California, commenced  arriving in the Salt Lake Valley. Their animals were worn out by the long and  strenuous journey, for in their haste for gold, these travelers had sacrificed  all things, that they might make haste to their destination. Now they were  anxious to obtain fresh animals for their tired ones, that they might hurry on  their journey. To do this they were willing to dispose of their goods at a great  sacrifice. They lightened their loads in the interest of speed and disposed of  their provisions, clothing and other materials, at a price below the cost of the  articles in the states at the time they started on their westward journey.

 

Notes

 

1.  September 13, 1913, a monument commemorating this event, was unveiled on the  Temple Block, Salt Lake City. The “Seagull Monument,” as it is called, is the  work of Mahonri M. Young, grandson of President Brigham Young.

 

 Chapter 42 Church Activities. 1850 through 1857

 

A Provisional Government

 

When the first settlers arrived in the Salt Lake Valley, they were directed  exclusively by Church authority. However, the people realized that civil  government must be inaugurated in their several settlements after they were  founded. As early as the fall of 1847 some municipal officers were appointed,  although no city government was effected at that time. Before leaving Nauvoo,  the authorities of the Church had expressed the desire of organizing a civil  government under the flag of the United States. While on the plains they wrote  to President James K. Polk, under date of August 6, 1846, and “resolved” that as  soon as they were settled in the Great Basin they would petition the United  States for a territorial government, “bounded on the north by the British, and  south by the Mexican dominions, and east and west by the summits of the Rocky  and Cascade Mountains.”

 

The First Political Convention

 

In February 1849, a call was issued for a political convention. The people  residing within the territory bounded by the Rocky Mountains, the Republic of  Mexico, the Sierra Nevada Mountains and the Territory of Oregon, were invited to  assemble at Great Salt Lake City, March 5, 1849. On that date a convention was  held, and Congress was petitioned to organize the Territory of Deseret.1 A  constitution was adopted and a provisional government was set up.

 

The Territory of Utah

 

Other petitions were also sent to Washington, asking for statehood, but the  government was not willing to grant all that the inhabitants of the Great Basin  desired. Enemies and bitter apostates lent their aid to defeat the project. In  September 1850, Congress passed a bill for the organization of the territory of  Utah, which was approved by the President. The people preferred the name  “Deseret,”2 but gladly accepted what was offered them.

 

Territorial Officers Appointed

 

In September 1850, President Millard Fillmore appointed the federal officers for  the territory of Utah. Brigham Young was appointed governor, a position he had  held in the “Provisional State of Deseret.” Broughton D. Harris, of Vermont, was  appointed secretary; Joseph Buffington, of Pennsylvania, chief justice; Perry C.  Brocchus, of Alabama, and Zerubbabel Snow of Ohio the latter a member of the  Church  associate justices; Seth M. Blair, attorney; and Joseph L. Heywood,  United States marshal. The two latter were residents of Utah. Judge Buffington  declined and Lemuel C. Brandebury, of Pennsylvania, was appointed in his stead.  In addition to these officers there were three Indian agents. Four of these  federal officers were members of the Church. The appointment of President Young  as governor, was due to the influence of Colonel Thomas L. Kane, the staunch and  faithful friend of the Latter-day Saints.

 

The “Run-Away Officials”

 

Three of these officials came to Utah filled with prejudice, and one, at least  (Judge Brocchus), hoped that he might be elected to office and represent the  territory in Congress. He had no desire to stay in the West. Together with Chief  Justice Brandebury and Secretary Harris, he determined to leave again for the  East, and preparations were made toward that end. These men complained of the  smallness of their salaries, and Governor Young and other citizens petitioned  Washington in their behalf. Harris declared “that he had private instructions  designed for no eye but his own, to watch every movement and not pay out any  funds unless the same should be strictly legal, and according to his own  judgment.” When he decided to return to the East he also determined to take with  him the funds which he had brought for territorial purposes. An attempt was made  to prevent this action by legislative enactment, but he was sustained by the two  judges, and carried the funds back to St. Louis, where he deposited them with  the assistant treasurer of the United States. It was in September, 1851, when  these officials left the territory.

 

Their Report to Washington

 

The three run-away officials reported in Washington that they were compelled to  leave Utah on account of the lawless acts and seditious tendencies of Brigham  Young and the majority of the residents. 3  They accused Governor Young with a  waste of public funds  which they had refused to let him have and referred to  the existence of “polygamy” among the “Mormons.”

 

Governor Young’s Defense

 

Anticipating the accusations of these officials, because of threats made before  their departure, Governor Young wrote to President Fillmore, September 29, 1851,  setting forth his own course and the true condition in the territory. This  letter was augmented by others from Jedediah M. Grant, mayor of Salt Lake City,  who was then in the East, and Col. Thomas L. Kane.4 Daniel Webster, secretary of  state, ordered these officials to return to their posts or resign; so resign  they did.

 

Their Places Filled

 

The places of these men were later filled. Lazarus H. Reed, of New York, was  appointed chief justice for Utah; Leonidas Shaver, associate justice, and  Benjamin G. Ferris, secretary. Secretary Ferris did not remain in the territory  very long, but the two justices were respected by the people who held them in  high esteem.

 

The Deseret Evening News

 

In each of the settlements of the Latter-day Saints, before coming to Utah, they  had endeavored to publish magazines and periodicals for the benefit of the  Saints. In keeping with this custom a small wrought-iron Ramage handpress, was  purchased in Philadelphia and brought across the plains by one of the early  companies. In 1850, this press was put to use, and the first newspaper published  in the Rocky Mountains made its appearance in Salt Lake City. This was the  Deseret News, the first number of which was published June 15, 1850, with  President Willard Richards as editor. It was a small quarto, issued weekly, and  has since grown into one of the influential daily papers in the inter-mountain  country.

 

Announcement of the Plural Marriage Doctrine

 

August 28 and 29, 1852, a special conference was held in Salt Lake City. One  hundred and six elders were called to go on missions to various fields,  including the countries of Europe, Russia, India, China, South Africa,  Australia, Hawaii, and other islands of the sea, as well as the states of the  Union. On the second day the first public announcement of the doctrine of plural  marriage was declared. The revelation given to the Prophet Joseph Smith, dealing  with the new and everlasting covenant and including the doctrine of marriage for  eternity and “plural wives,” was read. Elder Orson Pratt delivered the first  public discourse on this principle, dealing with the subject from a scriptural  standpoint. He emphasized the fact that the practice of plural marriage among  the Latter-day Saints was not to “gratify the carnal lusts and feelings of man,”  but was to be practiced in all holiness. Moreover, that there was but one who  held the keys of this power, and there were “bounds and restrictions” which the  Lord had set, and all who obeyed this law should be in harmony with the law,  receiving the sanction of the one who held the keys. Following the discourse of  Elder Orson Pratt, President Brigham Young made some remarks dealing with the  history of the revelation.

 

Laying the Corner Stones of the Salt Lake Temple

 

In February, 1853, ground was broken for the foundation of the Salt Lake Temple.  Wednesday, April 6, the corner stones were laid with solemn and impressive  ceremonies. This was the beginning of the most costly and imposing temple yet to  be erected by the Church, and was to take forty years in the building. Other  temples had been built, but the Saints had not been granted the privilege of  enjoying blessings in them for any length of time. In this far western country,  they hoped to build undisturbed, and have the opportunity of receiving their own  blessings therein and also labor for their dead. It was at first proposed to  build the temple of sandstone from Red Butte Canyon, and a wooden track was laid  from the city to the canyon for the purpose of hauling the rock. It was finally  decided to build of granite, which was found in abundance in Little Cottonwood  Canyon, some eighteen or twenty miles south-east of the city.

 

A Solemn Assembly

 

On the morning of April 6, 1853, thousands of Latter-day Saints assembled in  conference. President Young made a few introductory remarks saying that in a few  years “we may have a place sufficiently large to accommodate the Saints,  although, twenty-three years ago, the Church was organized with only six  members.” The choir sang and prayer was offered by Elder John Taylor. The  procession then formed and moved to the foundation of the temple. The general  authorities of the Church and the authorities of the Salt Lake Stake, took their  places around the foundation and the ceremonies of laying the corner stones  proceeded.

 

Dedication of the Corner Stones

 

The First Presidency, with John Smith the patriarch laid the first or south-east  corner stone, according to the pattern given by the Prophet Joseph Smith.  Following this ceremony President Young delivered an oration, and near the close  he said:

 

 “We dedicate the south-east corner stone of the temple to the Most High God. May  it remain in peace till it has done its work, and until He who has inspired our  hearts to fulfil the prophecies of his holy prophets, that the house of the Lord  should be reared in the ‘tops of the mountains’ shall be satisfied, and say it  is enough.”

 

President Kimball then offered the prayer of dedication, and the assembly  gathered at the south-west corner stone, which was laid by the Presiding  Bishopric, followed by an oration by Bishop Edward Hunter, and a prayer of  dedication by Bishop Alfred Cordon. The north-west corner stone was laid by the  presidency of the high priests, and President John Young of that quorum,  delivered the oration. Elder George B. Wallace offered the prayer of dedication.  The last, or north-east corner stone, was laid by the council of the twelve.  Elder Parley P. Pratt delivered an oration and the prayer of dedication was  offered by Elder Orson Hyde.

 

After benedictory remarks by President Young, the procession returned to the  Tabernacle and were dismissed.

 

President Young’s Vision

 

In the afternoon service of that day, President Young spoke at length in  relation to temple building. In the course of his remarks he said:

 

 “I scarcely ever say much about revelations, or visions, but suffice it to say,  five years ago last July [1847], I was here and saw in the spirit the temple not  ten feet from where we have laid the chief corner stone. I have not inquired  what kind of a temple we should build. Why? Because it was represented before  me. I never looked upon that ground, but the vision of it was there. I see it as  plainly as if it was in reality before me. Wait until it is done. I will say,  however, that it will have six towers, to begin with, instead of one. Now do not  any of you apostatize because it will have six towers, and Joseph only built  one. It is easier for us to build sixteen, than it was for him to build one. The  time will come when there will be one in the center of temples we shall build,  and on the top, groves and fish ponds.”5

 

Success in Foreign Mission Fields

 

The missionaries sent out to various parts of the earth in 1849 and succeeding  years, met with varied success. The Church membership in the British Mission,  before heavy emigration set in, was about twenty-eight thousand souls. Outside  of Great Britain perhaps the greatest success in any foreign field fell to the  lot of Erastus Snow and his companions, who introduced the Gospel in  Scandinavia. Many branches were raised up, especially in Denmark, where Elders  Snow, Peter O. Hansen, George P. Dykes and John E. Forsgren were laboring. Elder  Forsgren carried the Gospel into Sweden and, later (1851) Hans F. Petersen and  Hans Peter Jensen, to Norway. In each of these countries the elders were  successful, although little headway was made in Sweden until 1853, Elder  Forsgren having been banished soon after his arrival there. In Denmark,  persecution raged, and several of the elders were brutally treated, while in  Norway they were cast into prison. Elders John Taylor and companions in France  were able to make some converts, but found it to be a hard field. Elders  Lorenzo Snow, Joseph Toronto and Thomas B. H. Stenhouse, in Italy, found  conditions similar to those the elders encountered in France. Meeting with no  success in Genoa, they moved to the Protestant valleys of Piedmont, where a few  were baptized. Finally Elder Stenhouse was sent into Switzerland to open the  door for the Gospel there, where many were waiting to embrace the truth. The  elders in India made a number of converts, but principally among the English,  and branches of the Church were organized in that land. The message of salvation  was also successfully carried into Australia, by John Murdock and Charles W.  Wandell; into South Africa, by Elders Jesse Haven, Leonard I. Smith and William  Walker; Hawaii, by Elder George Q. Cannon and companions. In China the mission  opened by Elders Hosea Stout, James Lewis and Chapman Duncan, was a failure, and  Elders Parley P. Pratt and Rufus Allen returned from South America, they being  unable, because of political disturbances, to get a foothold there. Elders  Addison Pratt, Benjamin F. Grouard, James Brown and others, were banished from  the Society Islands, and the native Saints were sentenced to hard labor for  holding meetings. Elders Pratt and Grouard, with Noah Rodgers, who died crossing  the plains in 1846, had successfully introduced the Gospel in those and other  islands of the Pacific in the day of the Prophet Joseph Smith.

 

The Foundation for Future Labors

 

These early missionaries laid the foundation for the preaching of the Gospel in  many foreign lands, which has been continued since that time with wonderful  results. Thousands of honest converts have gladly received the message of  salvation, and with the spirit of gathering resting upon them, have come to  Zion, as the prophets foretold, with songs of everlasting joy.

 

The Hand-Cart Immigration

 

The early companies arriving in the Salt Lake Valley came with oxen, mules and  horses and heavy laden wagons. The people, however, quite generally were under  the necessity of walking across the plains by the sides of their wagons. It  became apparent that other and cheaper methods would have to be employed to  accommodate the increasing immigration. As early as 1851, the First Presidency  suggested the use of handcarts as a means of making the journey from Iowa  westward. In fact, there were in the Salt Lake Valley at that time some who had  crossed the plains in that manner, with comparative comfort and safety, and this  had led to the suggestion of general travel in hand-cart companies. It was not  until about the year 1856, however, that the idea was impressed upon the  foreign Saints, and then after repeated suggestions. When they did take hold of  it they entered into the spirit of hand-cart transportation with enthusiasm.  Especially was this the case with the members of the Church in the British  Isles. With handcarts, the British Saints could make the journey from Liverpool  to Salt Lake City for about forty-five dollars, coming by way of Boston or New  York to Iowa City, where they were fitted out to cross the plains. To those who  were scarcely able to raise means, or who did not care to be indebted to the  Perpetual Emigration Fund Company, this was a decided advantage.

 

The First Hand-Cart Companies

 

The first hand-cart companies to cross the plains were led by Edmund Ellsworth  and Daniel D. McArthur. Ellsworth’s company, numbering 266 souls, left Iowa  City, June 9, 1856. McArthur followed two days later with a company of 220. A  third and smaller company of Welsh Saints, under command of Edward Bunker, left  on the 23rd. The members of these three companies pushed their hand-carts  containing all their worldly possessions, over the plains, the mountains, and  through rivers and streams, a distance of about thirteen hundred miles. A few  deaths among the aged and infirm occurred on the way, but these companies all  arrived in Salt Lake City in good condition and happy to be in Zion. The  companies of Ellsworth and McArthur arrived on the 26th of September, having  been delayed by the breaking down of hand-carts which were built of unseasoned  timber, and therefore could not stand the strain and the excessive heat of the  summer sun. They were met and welcomed by the First Presidency and a large  concourse of citizens, with a brass band, at the foot of Little Mountain, in  Emigration Canyon, and were escorted into the city where they received a royal  welcome. These two companies arrived with ninety-six hand-carts, five wagons,  twenty-four oxen, four mules, and twenty-five tents. October 2, Captain Edward  Bunker’s company arrived without having had serious loss, and were also met with  enthusiastic welcome.

 

The Willie and Martin Companies

 

Two other companies with hand-carts were fitted out in the summer of 1856. The  members of these companies were mainly from Great Britain and Scandinavia. They  arrived in Iowa City, the starting point, near the end of June and in the fore  part of July, where they discovered that the tents and hand-carts for their use,  were not provided. Consequently they were delayed until these necessary articles  could be manufactured, or purchased. The delay was dangerous, for the season was  advancing, and the journey across the plains should not have been undertaken as  late as the middle of July, when the first company was prepared to start. This  company under the command of James G. Willie, left Iowa City, July 15, and  Florence [Winter Quarters], Nebraska, on the 19th of August. They were followed  by the second belated company, the fifth of the season, under the command of  Edward Martin, about two weeks later.

 

The Question of Traveling Considered

 

While at Florence, the question whether they should pursue their journey from  that point, or go into winter quarters, was discussed. The majority were in  favor of continuing on the way, although there were dissenting voices, because  of the lateness of the season and the dangers the journey entailed.6  Nevertheless the decision was reached and they determined to go on rather than  remain on the plains through the winter. They fully hoped to reach Salt Lake  City before the chilling blasts of winter should overtake them. This was a fatal  error, but one, of course, unexpected by most of the companies, for the winter  season set in much earlier than usual that year, and was most severe.

 

The Babbitt and Margetts Tragedies

 

The fore part of this hand-cart journey passed pleasantly enough for such a  trip, except for the breaking down of carts and feelings of anxiety because of  Indian raids. The Cheyennes were on the warpath and had made attacks on a number  of preceding immigration trains. In September, while the handcart companies were  on the Platte, Almon W. Babbitt, secretary of Utah, and a number of his camp who  were in advance were killed. They were on their way to Utah from Washington,  with a train of government property. A short time later Thomas Margetts and  wife; James Cody, wife and child, who were on their way to England, were killed  by the marauding Indians. News of these massacres did not tend to lighten the  hearts of the hand-cart immigrants, but it did serve to make them more  vigilant. Even then, they were deprived of many of their cattle, which were  stolen by the red men.

 

Disasters on the Way

 

Notwithstanding all the difficulties and dangers in their path, these two  companies pressed on with all possible speed. In the fore part of their journey,  they made favorable daily progress, but as they continued, and the roads became  more rough and repairs were constantly necessary, their progress was delayed.  Due to the lightness of their hand-carts and the hasty manner in which they were  constructed of unseasoned wood, they began to fall to pieces before the  companies were well on the journey, and to repair them required time.

 

While they were on the Platte, in the middle of September, the first frosts of  the season were encountered, which increased in severity day by day. September  30, Captain Willie’s company arrived at Fort Laramie five hundred miles east of  their destination  and the next day continued on their way. From this point on  they encountered the hardest part of their travel, and winter was fast  approaching. Their rations were growing less, and restrictions were placed upon  them. What was worse, due to the loss of conveyances and the heavy grades they  had to climb when they reached the mountains, they had to discard a portion of  their burdens. Articles of clothing and bedding had to be left on the way, that  progress might be made. Improperly clad and with poor shelter, they were exposed  to the piercing winds and bitter cold of the early winter storms. This caused  them severe suffering, and many of the more delicate were placed in untimely  graves along the way, without proper ceremony and in compelling haste. Under  such adverse conditions they were forced to push on, and wait not for anything,  for emergency demanded haste, lest the grim and merciless winter embrace them in  the grasp of death.

 

The sufferings of the advance company were repeated, but with greater severity,  by the one which traveled in the rear. The Martin camp was composed of a larger  number of women and children, and the inclement season, augmented by the many  other difficulties encountered, caused greater loss of life in their ranks.

 

Extreme Suffering on the Sweetwater

 

On the Sweetwater, these immigrants encountered extreme winter weather and heavy  snows. Death had occurred frequently during these stages of the journey. After  one of these severe storms fifteen members of the camp died in one day, while  others were severely injured.

 

A Party to the Rescue

 

Through reports from returning missionaries who passed these hand-cart companies  on the way, President Brigham Young learned that they were on the plains.  Fearing for their safety, he organized relief parties and sent them out with  provisions, clothing and bedding to help them to reach the valley. An advance  guard of two young men, Joseph A. Young and Stephen Taylor, was sent in a light  wagon to inform the weary and stricken travelers that relief was on the way. As  these young men approached the hand-cart company led by Captain Willie, they  appeared as angels of mercy. “More welcome messengers never came from the courts  of glory,” said John Chislett, “than these two young men were to us. They lost  no time, after encouraging us all they could to press forward, but sped on  further to convey their glad news to Edward Martin and the fifth hand-cart  company, who had left Florence about two weeks after us, and who it was feared,  were even worse off than we were. As they went from our view, many a hearty ‘God  bless you,’ followed them.”

 

“Martin’s Ravine”

 

As the rescuers pressed on their way they discovered the Martin company in a  ravine, between the Platte and the Sweetwater. The place has been designated  “Martin’s Ravine,” and here the sufferers had made their camp. They had about  given up all hope and were ready to succumb to the rigorous and persecuting  winter, when word was received that relief was coming. The joy that filled the  hearts of the survivors  for death had charged such heavy toll that the ravine  was like an overcrowded tomb is beyond the power of mortal pen to write.

 

The Arrival in the Valley

 

With the help of the brethren, and the supplies from the valley, the survivors  of these two belated trains arrived in Salt Lake City in November. Captain  Willie’s company entered the city on the 9th, and Captain Martin’s three weeks  later. Out of Captain Willie’s company of between four and five hundred souls,  seventy-seven had perished. Of the Martin company about one-fourth of the five  hundred and seventy-six who started found graves along the way.

 

Later Hand-Cart Immigration

 

Other companies with hand-carts crossed the plains in subsequent years. And from  the Salt Lake Valley missionaries employed hand-carts to help them to their  distant fields of labor. Never again, however, was a condition permitted to  arise such as that which overtook the companies under Captains Willie and Martin  in the fall of 1856.

 

The Passing of Prominent Men

 

During the period covered in this chapter, several prominent elders of the  Church passed away. Oliver Cowdery, who at the incipiency of the work, stood  with the Prophet Joseph Smith as the second elder of the Church, and who, with  the Prophet, held the keys of this dispensation, as they were received from holy  angels, passed away. He died March 3, 1850, at Richmond, Missouri. Only a few  months before his death [See Chap. 41] he returned to the Church after an  alienation of several years. Presiding Bishop Newel K. Whitney, who was also  among the first to embrace the Gospel, died in Salt Lake City, October 13, 1850.  He joined the Church in Kirtland in 1831, and passed through the trying scenes  of Ohio, Missouri and Illinois. He was ordained to be the second bishop of the  Church, and after the death of Edward Partridge, was sustained as the presiding  bishop. In 1848 he led a company of immigrants to the Salt Lake Valley. Two of  his sons, Horace K. and Orson K., were members of the pioneer band, but their  father remained at Winter Quarters, where his services were required during  those trying times. He was succeeded as presiding bishop by Edward Hunter in  1851.

 

March 11, 1854, Willard Richards, second counselor to President Brigham Young,  died in Salt Lake City. He was born in Massachusetts, in 1804, and was baptized  by Brigham Young, December 31, 1836. The following year he accompanied Elder  Heber C. Kimball and others to England and assisted in the opening of that  mission. After his companions returned, he remained as one of the presidency of  the British Mission, in which capacity he was laboring when the apostles went to  that land. Having been called to the apostleship, he was ordained in Preston,  England, by President Brigham Young and other members of the council of the  apostles, April 14, 1840. He returned to the United States in 1841, and became  the private secretary to the Prophet Joseph Smith, and was with him in Carthage  prison at the time of the martyrdom. From 1842 until his death he was Church  historian and recorder and at the reorganization of the First Presidency, was  selected by President Young as his second counselor. In this position he was  succeeded by Elder Jedediah M. Grant, and as historian, by Elder George A.  Smith.

 

“Uncle” John Smith, the presiding patriarch of the Church, died in Salt Lake  City, May 23, 1854. He was a man of tried integrity and had served in the  councils of the Church from the time of his baptism until his death. He was  among the first of the Prophet’s relatives to receive the truth and through his  influence others were converted. He was succeeded in the office of patriarch, by  John Smith, eldest son of the Patriarch Hyrum Smith.

 

Elder Orson Spencer, a man of superior education, who served the Church  faithfully and well as a missionary for many years, was called to the other side  of the veil, October 15, 1855, while at St. Louis. He had presided in the  British Mission during one of the critical periods in that land.

 

Jedediah M. Grant, second counselor to President Brigham Young, died in Salt  Lake City, December 1, 1856, after a brief illness. He was a young man of  forceful character and had been identified with the Church since 1833. He was a  member of Zion’s Camp in 1834; was chosen among the first seventies, and in that  calling filled a number of successful missions throughout the United States. He  passed through the persecutions of Missouri and Illinois, and arrived in the  Salt Lake Valley, in charge of the last company to cross the plains in 1847. He  was the first mayor of Salt Lake City, and when he was called to be a counselor  to President Young, was serving as one of the first council of the seventies. He  was succeeded as a counselor in the First Presidency by Elder Daniel H. Wells.

 

The Assassination of Parley P. Pratt

 

Another death, occurring May 13, 1857, was that of Elder Parley P. Pratt of the  council of the twelve. In the autumn of 1856, Elder Pratt left Salt Lake City  with a company of missionaries, and crossed the plains. That winter he labored  in St. Louis, Philadelphia, New York and other cities in the East. In the spring  of 1857, he was in Arkansas. While there he attempted to assist a Mrs. Hector H.  McLean, who was a member of the Church, to obtain possession of her children,  she having separated from her husband because of drunkenness and cruelty. McLean  accused Elder Pratt of alienating the affections of his wife and attempting to  abduct the children. A trial was held, and Elder Pratt was acquitted of the  charge. Shortly afterwards, as he was journeying from Van Buren County where  the court was held, intending to join an immigrant company for Utah, he was  overtaken by McLean who plunged a bowie knife in his side. After Elder Pratt had  fallen from his horse, McLean shot him with a pistol. The assassin was never  punished for the foul deed. In this manner died one of the greatest expounders  of the latter-day faith, a poet and writer, whose works survive and have done  much to bring many to a knowledge of the Gospel. Although their author’s voice  has long been stilled, his work yet speaks with convincing power.

 

Notes

 

1.  Col. Thomas L. Kane advised the Saints to petition for statehood, rather  than for a territorial form of government, pointing out that they would be  permitted to govern themselves in a state government, but in a territory they  would likely be subject to outside politicians, who would not be in sympathy  with them, and perhaps their enemies. The people took his advice, but were not  successful in obtaining their desire. Even under territorial regulations they  should have been granted self government, through the appointment of officials  from their own communities, but this proved to be the exception during the long  history of Utah as a territory. And with a few honorable exceptions, the  officers sent to them from other parts, were broken down politicians and men to  whom political office was tendered as a debt for party service. Many of them  were extremely bitter against the Saints, and resorted to falsehood and  misrepresentation, in order to bring the majority of the inhabitants of the  territory into disrepute at Washington and throughout the nation. Under such  conditions conflict was constant and inevitable.

 

2.  Deseret is a Book of Mormon term meaning “honey bee.”

 

3.  These “lawless acts and seditious tendencies,” evidently had reference to  certain remarks made by President Brigham Young, in a discourse in which he said  the United States looked on scenes of mobbing, driving, and murdering of  Latter-day Saints in Missouri and Illinois, without interference, or taking  steps to correct the evil, but by silence gave sanction to such proceedings.  Moreover for a rebuke administered to Judge Brocchus, who at a special  conference of the Church in September, 1851, was privileged to speak and accused  the leaders of the Church of disloyalty, and reflected upon the virtue of the  women of the Latter-day Saints.

 

 4. Following is a letter from Col. Thomas L. Kane to President Fillmore in  defense of Governor Brigham Young:

 

 Philadelphia, July 11, 1851.

 

 My Dear Sir: I have no wish to evade the responsibility of having vouched for  the character of Mr. Brigham Young, of Utah, and his fitness for the station he  now occupies. I reiterate without reserve, the statement of his excellent  capacity, energy, and integrity, which I made you prior to his appointment. I am  willing to say I volunteered to communicate to you facts by which I was  convinced of his patriotism, and devotion to the interest of the Union. I made  no qualification when I assured you of his irreproachable moral character,  because I was able to speak of this from my own intimate, personal knowledge.

 

 If any shadow of evidence can be adduced in support of the charges of your  anonymous assailant, the next mail from Utah shall bring you their complete and  circumstantial refutation. Meanwhile I am ready to offer this assurance for  publication in any form you care to indicate, and challenge contradiction from  any respectable authority.

 

 I am, Sir, with high respect and esteem, your most obedient servant,

 

 Thomas L. Kane.

 

 The President.

 

5.  Millennial Star 15:488.

 

 6. While the consideration of this momentous question was being discussed the  brethren were advised by Elder Levi Savage, who was returning from a mission to  Siam and Ceylon, that such a journey so late in the season should not be  undertaken, and it would be better to go into winter quarters and wait until  spring. He had been over the route and knew the dangers they would likely  encounter, but he was overruled. According to the narrative of this fatal  journey given by John Chislett, when Elder Savage was overruled he said: “What I  have said I know to be true; but seeing you are to go forward, I will go with  you; will help all I can; will work with you, will rest with you, will suffer  with you, and if necessary, will die with you. May God in his mercy bless and  preserve us.” These were noble sentiments worthy of a place in the archives of  time.

 

For a descriptive and comparatively full account of these journeyings of the two  belated pioneer companies of hand-carts, the reader is referred to the History  of Utah, by Orson F. Whitney, vol. 1:547.

 

 Chapter 43 “The Utah War”. 1856 through 1858

 

Political Changes

 

Chief Justice Lazarus H. Reed, after a short stay in Utah, resigned because of  ill-health, and returned to the East where he died in the spring of 1855. He was  succeeded as chief justice by John F. Kinney, of Iowa, in 1854. After the close  of the term of Judge Zerubbabel Snow, William W. Drummond, of Illinois, was  appointed associate justice. Judge Leonidas Shaver died suddenly in Salt Lake  City in June, 1855, due to an abscess on the brain, and he was succeeded by  George P. Stiles.

 

Character of the Federal Judges

 

Chief Justice Kinney was a gentleman, and performed his duty faithfully without  partiality. The appointment of the two associate justices was a calamity.  Drummond was dishonest and licentious. He left his wife and family in Illinois  without means for their support, and brought with him to the territory a common  courtesan, whom he introduced as his wife. This woman he honored with a place by  his side while he sat in court dispensing advice to the “Mormons” on morality.  Judge Stiles had been a member of the Church, but was excommunicated for immoral  conduct. Like most characters of that class, he became very abusive and a bitter  enemy of the Church. The corruption of Judge Drummond coming to light, that  individual left the territory in disgrace.

 

Falsehoods of Drummond and Stiles

 

March 30, 1857, Judge Drummond wrote a letter to the attorney general of the  United States, making false charges against Governor Young and the “Mormon”  people. He went to Carson County to hold court, and then continued on to the  coast never to return to Utah. In his communication he declared that the records  of the supreme court of Utah had been destroyed; that Brigham Young had given  his approval to this treasonable deed, and with his knowledge it was done; that  Brigham Young, as governor, had pardoned “Mormon” criminals and imprisoned  innocent “Gentiles;” he had insulted federal judges; the American Government had  been traduced and men “insulted, harrassed and murdered for doing their duty.”  He accused the “Mormon” people of the murder of Almon W. Babbitt; of  perpetrating the Gunnison massacre,1 and of the death of Judge Shaver, who died  a natural death. He placed the responsibility of these alleged crimes at the  door of the authorities of the Church.

 

Judge Stiles also filed an affidavit at Washington, affirming much that Judge  Drummond had said, and emphasizing the statement that the court records and  papers had been destroyed. Others also added to the unrighteous accusations with  the evil thought of bringing the Church into disrepute. Among them were Indian  Agent Garland Hurt, and W. M. Magraw. The latter having been disappointed in  losing the contract to carry mail across the plains, which contract was awarded  to Hiram Kimball, a “Mormon,” sought revenge by circulating falsehoods. He  stated that the civil laws of the territory were “overshadowed and neutralized  by the so-styled ecclesiastical organization, as despotic, dangerous and  damnable” as ever existed. Other, and even more serious accusations, he  forwarded in a communication to President Buchanan in October, 1856.

 

Denial of False Charges

 

Curtis E. Bolton, deputy clerk of the supreme court of Utah, made denial in his  official capacity, of the Drummond charges. He stated that the records and  papers of the court were all intact. This denial was speedily forwarded to the  attorney general of the United States, but was ignored in the face of the  various statements of the lying officials.

 

The Conspirators Demand Governor Young’s Removal

 

At the time these falsehoods were sent to Washington, Governor Brigham Young was  serving his second term. At the close of his first term as governor, Col. Edward  J. Steptoe of the United States Army, was appointed to that position. He  declined, and with Chief Justice Kinney, headed a petition, which bore the names  of the federal officials, army officers and prominent citizens in the territory,  asking for the reappointment of Governor Young. The petition bore fruit and  President Franklin Pierce continued Brigham Young in office. These conspirators  now endeavored to have him removed, and this desire was very largely the  underlying cause in their evil accusations.

 

“Buchanan’s Blunder”

 

Accepting at their face value, without any investigation, the inflammatory and  lying charges of the enemies of Utah, President James Buchanan determined on  changing the governor, and also appointed new judges. He further directed that  an army must accompany the new appointees, as a posse comitatus, to sustain the  authority of these officers, and suppress “rebellion” among the “Mormon” people.

 

It was announced through the war department that the “Mormons” “implicitly obey  their prophet from whose decrees there is no appeal.” Moreover, that they had  aimed from the beginning to secede from the Union, and had not “preserved even  the semblance of obedience to authority, only as it would benefit themselves.”  Such was the ignorance of the authorities at Washington regarding Latter-day  Saint affairs, so soon after the loyal and remarkable feat performed by the  Mormon Battalion in the war which made their territory a part of the United  States. Such was to be the reward of this loyal people who would sacrifice five  hundred of their most capable men in the hour of their greatest distress, at the  call of their country. These expressions from Washington were made in the face  of the constant appeals by the “Mormon” people for a form of government under  the Stars and Stripes, in spite of the evil treatment they had constantly  received within the borders of the United States; and, too, after their appeal  to the general government for redress of grievances was answered from  Washington, that their cause was just, but nothing could be done for them.

 

When appealing to Washington for redress, while they resided in Illinois, they  were advised by governors and leading statesmen to move to Oregon, where they  could set up a government of their own, free and independent of all other  earthly powers. Their reply to such advice was, that they were American  citizens, and where they went they would take the flag of their country with  them.

 

It appears from this distant date, that there were other motives prompting the  President of the United States in sending the flower of the army into the  “Mormon” country, ostensibly to suppress a rebellion which did not exist, and  aid in a rebellion soon to occur, which was destined to divide the nation  asunder. What-ever the motive, the army was sent, and was kept in Utah for a  number of years at the beginning of a critical period of the nation’s history.

 

Call of the Army

 

May 28, 1857, orders were issued from the war department for the assembling of  an army at Fort Leavenworth, to march to Utah as soon as possible. All mail  toward Utah had been stopped, and for some reason the government conducted its  campaign against that territory with great secrecy. It was practically a  declaration of war by the United States against one of her dependent units,  without investigation or just cause a thing without a parallel in the annals of  our country. “It is probable,” states Bancroft, “that no expedition was ever  dispatched by the United States better equipped and provisioned than was the  army of Utah, of which the portion now under orders mustered about twenty-five  hundred men.” Then he argues that the expedition was conducted in the interests  of the contractors. The men who secured the flour contract netted in a single  year the sum of one hundred and seventy thousand dollars.

 

How the Saints Learned of the Expedition

 

While all these warlike preparations were going on, the Saints in the Rocky  Mountains, dwelling in peace, were innocent of any threatened invasion. The  first information of such an expedition was received by Elders Feramorz Little  and Ephraim K. Hanks in February, 1857. They had just arrived at Independence  with mail, where they heard from several parties who desired to secure contracts  from the government for handling the supply trains, that a movement was on foot  against Utah. They could hardly believe the rumors and reports that came to  their ears. Later Elder Abraham O. Smoot, on his way east with mail, met Elder  Little at Fort Laramie, from whom he heard the rumors. Proceeding on his way,  Elder Smoot met some troops and several trains of government supplies. From his  inquiries he received no satisfactory answer as to their destination, only that  they were bound for a western post and that the supplies belonged to William H.  Russell. At Independence he learned from Mr. Russell that the destination of the  trains was Salt Lake City, and that government troops would soon follow. He was  also informed that Brigham Young had been superseded as governor and that new  federal officers had been appointed for Utah. Gaining all the information he  could, Elder Smoot commenced his homeward journey, traveling leisurely at first,  for fear of arousing suspicion, but increasing his speed as he neared his  destination. A short distance east of Fort Laramie he met Orrin Porter Rockwell  with the east bound mail. To him he told his story and together they, and Judson  L. Stoddard, returned to the Salt Lake Valley, arriving on the evening of July  23.

 

The 24th of July Celebration

 

When these brethren arrived they learned that President Brigham Young and about  twenty-six hundred people had gone to Silver Lake, at the head of Big Cottonwood  Canyon. There they expected to celebrate the twenty-fourth the tenth anniversary  of the arrival of the pioneers in Salt Lake Valley. On the morning of the 24th,  Mayor Smoot of Salt Lake City, Judson L. Stoddard, Judge Elias Smith and Orrin  P. Rockwell, started for the scene of the celebration. They arrived in the  afternoon in the midst of the ceremonies and the first view to attract their  gaze was the Stars and Stripes unfurled from two lofty peaks and some of the  tallest trees. With grave countenances these messengers bearing evil tidings  approached Governor Young and told their story. A council of the brethren was  called and the situation discussed. That evening the assembly was informed by  General Daniel H. Wells of the militia, that an army was on its way to Utah. He  gave instructions as to the manner of the departure from the camp on the  following morning. Early the next day (25th) the people, so happy the day  before, returned to their homes with bowed heads and hearts filled with sadness.

 

The Decision of the Council

 

Twice in Missouri and once in Illinois had the Saints been driven from their  homes at the point of the bayonet, and that, too, by aid of state authority.  Their Prophet and Patriarch had been foully murdered by a mob while under the  pledge of protection of a governor of Illinois. The Saints had been murdered and  robbed while the nation looked on without interference. And now there was coming  to their distant home, a body of troops organized and equipped by the President  of the United States. They were coming without warning and without valid excuse.  Was it not natural under all the circumstances for this people to feel that once  again they were to be butchered, robbed and driven where, no one could tell!  Naturally they were aroused. Their backs were against the wall. They must make a  stand, and if to fight was the intention of the troops, then fight it should be.  They were determined to maintain their inherent and constitutional rights.  Conquered, they should not be; if they were driven they should leave the land as  desolate as they found it. If the government of the United States desired to  install new officers, they could come in peace, and welcome. Such had always  been the attitude of the Latter-day Saints. They could only judge by the  experiences of the past what the designs of the army might be, for no word had  been sent them of its purpose. “Liars have reported that this people have  committed treason, and upon their misrepresentations the President has ordered  out troops to assist in officering the territory,” said President Young. “We  have transgressed no law, neither do we intend to do so; but as for any nation  coming to destroy this people, God Almighty being my helper, it shall not be.”  Such was the decision of the councils of the Church. And where is the patriot  whose blood would not burn within his veins; whose heart would not beat for  freedom; who would not stand as this band of humble worshipers of the Lord and  Savior of mankind proposed to stand, if driven to the extreme?

 

Captain Van Vliet

 

In advance of the army there came to Utah Captain Stewart Van Vliet of the  commissary department. His object was to discover if forage and fuel could be  obtained for the troops while in the territory. As soon as he arrived he  obtained an interview with Governor Young. He was treated with the greatest  kindness and hospitality, and so he reported to his superiors. However, he was  informed that no hostile force would be permitted to enter the Salt Lake Valley;  there was an abundance of every thing the troops would need, but not one thing  would be sold to them. Federal officers could come, if they came in peace, and  would be kindly and courteously received; but they could not bring an hostile  army.

 

Captain Van Vliet’s Report

 

In his report Captain Van Vliet said:

 

 “In the course of my conversation with the Governor and the influential men of  the Territory, I told them plainly and frankly what I conceived would be the  result of their present course. I told them that they might prevent the small  military force now approaching Utah from getting through the narrow defiles and  rugged passes of the mountains this year, but that next season the United States  Government would send troops sufficient to overcome all opposition. The answer  to this was invariably the same: ‘We are aware that such will be the case; but  when those troops arrive they will find Utah a desert. Every house will be  burned to the ground, every tree cut down, and every field laid waste. We have  three years’ provisions on hand, which we will cache, and then take to the  mountains and bid defiance to all the powers of the Government.’

 

“I attended their services on Sunday, and, in course of a sermon delivered by  Elder Taylor, he referred to the approach of the troops and declared they should  not enter the Territory. He then referred to the probability of an overpowering  force being sent against them, and desired all present who would apply the torch  to their buildings, cut down their trees, and lay waste their fields, to hold up  their hands. Every hand, in an audience numbering over four thousand persons,  was raised at the same moment. During my stay in the city I visited several  families, and all with whom I was thrown, looked upon the present movement of  the troops towards their Territory as the commencement of another religious  persecution, and expressed a fixed determination to sustain Governor Young in  any measure he might adopt.”

 

Good Resulting from the Visit

 

The sympathy of Captain Van Vliet was drawn out toward the people. He admired  their stand although careful of his expression as he was under orders from the  government. He was convinced that the people had been misrepresented and lied  about, and it is said he declared that if the government made war upon the  Saints, he would withdraw from the army. However, he thought the government  would send to Utah an investigating committee. “I believe,” said Governor Young,  “God sent you here, and that good will grow out of it. I was glad when I heard  you were coming. If we can keep the peace this winter, I feel sure that  something will occur to prevent the shedding of blood.” The captain returned to  Washington and made his report to the secretary of war.

 

Johnston in Command

 

When the army was ordered to Utah the command was given to General W. S. Harney,  who was at the time in charge at Fort Leavenworth. Captain Van Vliet called on  him when returning to Washington after his visit in Utah. The captain informed  General Harney of the attitude of the “Mormon” people and the conditions as they  existed in the territory. The general replied: “I am ordered there, and I will  winter in the valley, or in hell.” Late in the summer the command was given to  Colonel Albert Sidney Johnston, with the rank of brevet brigadier general.

 

The Start for Utah

 

The vanguard of the troops, under Colonel E. B. Alexander, started from Fort  Leavenworth in July. 1857. With them traveled Alfred Cumming, of Georgia, the  newly appointed governor, and other federal appointees for Utah. As the troops  reached the South Pass, they were met by Captain Van Vliet, who advised them not  to attempt to enter the Salt Lake Valley that winter, as no arrangements could  be made for supplies and they would have to fight their way through. Some of the  young officers, who were in advance, ignored the warning, and expressed the  thought that they were sufficiently able to force their way to Salt Lake  City ”that they could whip all Utah.” The second regiment he met was commanded  by old officers, who considered the matter seriously and expressed the thought  that it was an imposition that they should be sent out west “as a political  movement to kill innocent people, or to get killed.2”

 

Martial Law Proclaimed

 

After the departure of Captain Van Vliet from Salt Lake City, and while the army  was near the border of Utah, Governor Young proclaimed martial law throughout  the territory and notified Colonel Alexander of this action. The militia was  ordered to be held in readiness to repel any attempted invasion, but  instructions were given that no blood should be shed, unless it was absolutely  unavoidable. These instructions were carefully followed and only once during the  campaign were shots fired with intent to kill, and these were fired by the  government forces at a detachment under command of Major Lot Smith, who had been  sent out to destroy their trains. When fired upon there was no retaliation by  the members of the militia.

 

General Wells in Echo Canyon

 

Following the proclamation of Governor Young, Lieutenant General Daniel H. Wells  of the Nauvoo Legion the name by which the militia was known established  headquarters at “The Narrows” in Echo Canyon, a defile, rugged and steep, where  a few men could hold an army. To this point about twelve hundred and fifty men,  from several companies of the militia, were ordered to report, and maintain the  pass by force of arms against any attempted invasion.

 

Governor Young’s Ultimatum

 

Colonel Alexander continued his march, as it was fully expected that he would,  and crossed the border of the territory. September 29, General Wells forwarded  to Colonel Alexander copies of Governor Young’s proclamation, a copy of the laws  of Utah, and a letter from Governor Young addressed to “The Officer commanding  the forces now invading Utah Territory.” In this letter the following occurs:

 

 “By virtue of the authority vested in me, I have issued, and forwarded you a  copy of my proclamation forbidding the entrance of armed forces into this  Territory. This you have disregarded. I now further direct that you retire  forthwith from the Territory, by the same route you entered. Should you deem  this impracticable, and prefer to remain until spring in the vicinity of your  present encampment, Black’s Fork,3 or Green River, you can do so in peace and  unmolested on condition that you deposit your arms and ammunition with Lewis  Robison, quartermaster general of the Territory, and leave in the spring, as  soon as the condition of the roads will permit you to march; and should you fall  short of provisions, they can be furnished you, upon making the proper  applications therefor. General D. H. Wells will forward this, and receive any  communication you may have to make.”

 

In forwarding these communications General Wells declared that he was determined  to carry out Governor Young’s instructions.

 

Colonel Alexander’s Reply

 

Colonel Alexander made the only reply possible which was to the effect that he  would submit the communications to his superior officers and “in the meantime,”  he added, “I have only to say that these troops are here by order of the  President of the United States, and their future movements will depend entirely  upon orders issued by competent military authority.4

 

Guerrilla Warfare

 

Following this correspondence General Wells determined on carrying out his  instructions. He ordered Major Joseph Taylor and others under his command to  annoy the troops; stampede their cattle; set fire to their trains; burn the  whole country before them and on their flanks; keep them from sleeping by night  surprises; blockade the road; but must avoid strictly the taking of life. These  instructions were faithfully followed and Major Lot Smith with a company of  mounted rangers destroyed trains, ran off cattle and burned the grass, and  otherwise inflicted damage, but no blood was shed.

 

Arrival of General Johnston

 

Early in November, 1857, General Albert Sidney Johnston, with additional troops  and supplies, overtook the main body of the army on Black’s Fork. He was a  capable and popular officer and soon enthused the troops who had become  dispirited because of their many reverses. Their journey had not been a pleasant  one, the Indians had run off many of their cattle, and the “Mormon” mountaineers  had harassed them, had burned their trains of supplies, and destroyed the grass  on which their teams and cattle were dependent. But their troubles were only  beginning. Their haughty commander ordered a forward movement toward Fort  Bridger, disdaining to turn from the direct route through the mountains.

 

If “the stars in their courses fought against Sisera,” in the days of ancient  Israel, surely the elements fought against Johnston’s army in the days of modern  Israel. From their camp to Fort Bridger was less than forty miles, but it was a  barren desert. They found no shelter from the winter winds, there was no fuel,  except the sage, and very little pasture for their animals. They commenced on  the 6th of November, and their trains, extending for many miles, were forced to  face the snow and sleet of the most severe winter weather. Their teams were  goaded until they dropped dead in their traces. Fifteen days they were on the  journey. Their cattle died for lack of food and exposure to freezing weather.  When they arrived they found that Bridger and also Fort Supply, twelve miles  away, had been burned by the militia.

 

The Forward March Abandoned

 

It became apparent that it would be impossible to reach the Salt Lake Valley  before the coming spring. With great reluctance and injured pride the commander  gave orders that the troops go into winter quarters on Black’s Fork. During the  winter months Chief Justice Eckles, who with other federal officers dwelt in the  camp, organized a court, without waiting to qualify, and indicted the leading  men in Utah for treason and rebellion.

 

Proclamation of Governor Cumming

 

Governor Cumming issued a proclamation to the people of the territory in which  he said: “I come among you with no prejudice or enmities, and by the exercise of  a just and firm administration I hope to command your confidence. Freedom of  conscience and the use of your own peculiar mode of serving God are sacred  rights, the exercise of which is guaranteed by the Constitution, and with which  it is not the province of the government or the disposition of its  representatives in the territory to interfere.” Let it be said to his credit  that these sentiments were sincere, and when he was established in his office he  was brave enough to execute justice as he saw it. He commanded all armed bodies  in the territory to disband and return to their homes stating that disobedience  would “subject the offenders to the punishment due to traitors.”

 

There was no disposition on the part of the militia to disband. Too often had  they been despoiled by mobs under guise of lawful troops. They had stood enough  and were determined to defend their homes, no matter what were the accusations  made against them.

 

The Mediation of Colonel Kane

 

At the beginning of the difficulties Governor Young sent a communication to  Colonel Thomas L. Kane, explaining the motives in declaring martial law in Utah,  and asking him to intercede at Washington. This loyal friend of the “Mormons”  did not fail. He interviewed the President and offered his services as mediator  between the government and the people of Utah. His services were accepted and he  crossed the Isthmus of Panama, sailing from New York, and proceeded from  California to Utah, where he arrived in February, 1858. At the time Congress was  preparing to send reinforcements and money to carry on the “war.” Colonel Kane  arrived, delicate in health, and wishing to test the “Mormon” people appeared in  Salt Lake City in disguise as “Dr. Osborne.” He received hospitable treatment  and was welcomed warmly when he became known. He reported the nature of his  visit and reported that Captain Van Vliet had proved himself a friend of the  “Mormons” on his return to Washington.

 

After a few days’ rest Colonel Kane departed for the army camp on Black’s Fork  to interview Governor Cumming. After severe trials and adventures he arrived at  the camp. Governor Cumming received him cordially and agreed to place himself  under his direction and go to Salt Lake City without military aid. Such a step  was strongly opposed by General Johnston, who attempted to arrest Colonel Kane  as a spy. Governor Cumming felt insulted at the indignity offered and demanded  an explanation, which the commanding officer failed to give in a satisfactory  manner. The incident almost precipitated a duel between General Johnston and  Colonel Kane.

 

Governor Cumming Enters Salt Lake City His Reception

 

Accompanied by Colonel Kane and two servants, Governor Cumming set out for Salt  Lake City. On the way they were met by an escort of Utah cavalry. Arriving in  the city he was received with a cordial reception and was conducted to the home  of William C. Staines, the territorial librarian. President Young called on him  and bid him welcome saying, every facility that he might require for the  efficient performance of his administrative duties, would be at his command. The  governor wrote to General Johnston saying: “I have been everywhere recognized as  Governor of Utah; and so far from having encountered insults or indignities, I  am satisfied in being able to state to you, that in passing through the  settlements I have been universally greeted with such respectful attentions as  are due to the representative authority of the United States in the territory.”

 

The Governor’s Report to Secretary Cass

 

After a thorough examination, and finding all the records of the courts in  perfect order, Governor Cumming wrote to Secretary of State Lewis M. Cass  informing him of the true conditions in the territory and of the false reports  which had stood as a foundation for the sending of an army.

 

The Exodus Toward the South

 

When Governor Cumming arrived in the city he discovered that many of the  inhabitants of that place and the settlements to the north, had left their  homes. Others were journeying toward the south. Where they were bound he could  not learn more than that they were “going south” and driving their flocks and  herds before them. He expressed the belief to the government that the destiny of  these people was Sonora in northern Mexico. He regretted greatly that they felt  it necessary to move, but he could do nothing to persuade them to remain as long  as they were menaced by an army. Their experience in the past was too bitter in  this regard, and could not be forgotten.

 

“Our military force could overwhelm most of these poor people,” wrote the  governor, “involving men, women, and children in a common fate, but there are  among the ‘Mormons’ brave men, accustomed to arms and horses; men who could  fight desperately as guerrillas: and who, if the settlements are destroyed, will  subject the country to an expensive and protracted war, without any compensating  results. They will, I am sure, submit to ‘trial by their peers,’ but they will  not brook the idea of trials by ‘juries’ composed of ‘teamsters and followers of  the camp.’”

 

The Governor’s Wife Pleads for the People

 

In the middle of May, Governor Cumming returned to Camp Scott, where the troops  were quartered. When he returned, his wife was with him. She gazed upon the  deserted homes for the people had departed, leaving only a guard to fire their  property should the troops arrive in hostile attitude. The good woman wept and  pleaded with her husband to do something to bring back the people. “Rest assured  madam,” said he, “I shall do all I can. I only wish I could be in Washington for  two hours; I am sure I could convince the government that we have no need of  troops.”

 

The Peace Commission

 

Through the good services of faithful friends  among whom Colonel Thomas L. Kane  stands out in bold relief the government was persuaded to send peace  commissioners to Utah. These gentlemen were Governor L. W. Powell of Kentucky  and Major Ben McCullock of Texas. With them came Jacob Forney, Indian  Superintendent for Utah. They met with Governor Cumming, Brigham Young and other  prominent men, when the whole situation was discussed. It was agreed that there  should be no opposition to Johnston’s army passing through the city providing  they were not permitted to stop, but should pass on to make their camp at least  forty miles away.

 

Their Epistle to Johnston

 

An agreement having been reached, the commissioners addressed a communication to  General Johnston advising him of what had been done and requesting him to make  proclamation among his troops. The commander was surprised at the decision,  stating that the army would not trespass upon the rights or property of the  peaceable citizens. His men, many of them, were greatly disappointed, for they  were to be denied the privilege of plunder for which they hoped and talked about  as they marched upon their way.

 

The Arrival of the Troops

 

June 26, 1858, the army under command of General Johnston, entered the Salt Lake  Valley through Emigration Canyon. They passed through the city, now almost  without inhabitants, and camped on the opposite side of Jordan river. Colonel  Cooke, as he rode through the streets of the city, bared his head in honor of  the valiant and loyal men of the Mormon Battalion. Three days after their  arrival the troops passed on to the southwest and camped in Cedar Valley where  they founded Camp Floyd, named after the Secretary of War, and here was to be  their scene of action for several years to come.

 

The President’s “Pardon”

 

On the 6th of April, President Buchanan signed a proclamation, “offering to the  inhabitants of Utah, who shall submit to the laws, a free pardon for the  seditions and treasons heretofore by them committed; warning those who still  persist, after notice of this proclamation in the present rebellion against the  United States, that they must expect no further lenity.” This document, which is  quite lengthy, was brought to Utah with the commissioners. The authorities of  the Church denied that they had been disloyal, and disputed the statements in  the President’s proclamation. Nevertheless, they accepted his pardon for driving  off the cattle and burning the army trains, which they stoutly maintained was  done in self-defense; but the other charges they fully denied.

 

The fact is that President Buchanan had been roundly scored in the press, and by  statesmen in our own country and abroad. The easiest way out of it, for he had  committed a great blunder, was to issue a proclamation exonerating himself, and  pardoning the “culprits” who dared to maintain their rights against such  overwhelming odds.

 

Notes

 

1.  Captain John W. Gunnison, in charge of a party of topographical engineers,  was murdered by Indians, with a number of his party, near Sevier Lake, in  October 1853. The massacre was in revenge for the killing of one Indian and the  wounding of two others, by a company of emigrants on their way to California.  According to Indian practice the next company that came along was attacked as a  reprisal. At the time of this deed of blood the Indians under Chief Walker were  waging war on the inhabitants of Utah, that event is known in historical annals  as “The Walker War.” Captain Gunnison and companions were buried at Fillmore,  with respect and honor. The tragedy cast a gloom over all the “Mormon”  settlements, for the leader of this company of government representatives was  respected by all the people for his kindness and friendly feeling.

 

 2. Colonel Alexander, the ranking officer of the advance troops was a kindly  officer inclined towards establishing peace. Captain Van Vliet had come in  contact with the Latter-day Saints at Winter Quarters, when they were on the  plains. Another officer with these troops whose sympathy and good will went out  toward the “Mormons” was Colonel Philip St. George Cooke, who led the Mormon  Battalion in the Mexican War. General Johnston was from the South, proud and  haughty. He looked upon the “Mormons” and spoke of them as “rebels” and was  inclined to treat them as such.

 

The spirit also prevailed among the troops that the “Mormons” were their common  prey, and they constantly, while on the march, boasted with ribald jests, of  what they would do when they arrived in Salt Lake City. “We were well informed  as to the object of the coming of the army,” said Elder John Taylor to  Vice-President Schuyler Colfax, in 1869. “We had men in all their camps, and  knew what was intended. There was a continual boast among the men and officers,  even before they left the Missouri River, of what they intended to do with the  ‘Mormons.’ The houses were picked out that certain persons were to inhabit;  farms, property, and women were to be distributed. ‘Beauty and Booty’ were their  watchword. We were to have another grand ‘Mormon’ conquest, and our houses,  gardens, orchards, vineyards fields, wives and daughters were to be the spoils.”

 

3.  Black’s Fork and Green River mentioned here were at that time within the  borders of Utah, they are now in Wyoming, the corner in which they are located  having been severed from Utah in 1863 and 1868.

 

4.  The question might be raised as to why Brigham Young would forward a  communication as governor, when another had been appointed. Governor Young had  not been notified that his successor had been appointed and that successor had  not qualified as governor.

 

 Chapter 44 The Mountain Meadows Massacre. 1857

 

A Shocking Crime

 

While Captain Van Vliet was interviewing President Brigham Young, there was  occurring in the southwest corner of Utah  about three hundred miles from Salt  Lake City the most horrible and shocking crime ever perpetrated within the  borders of the state. It was the massacre at Mountain Meadows of a company of  emigrants who were journeying to southern California. This bloody and diabolical  deed commenced at dawn, September 7, 1857, and continued until the 11th, when  the besieged emigrants who survived the attacks, under promise of protection  were foully murdered.

 

It was the deed of enraged Indians aided by a number of white men, who took  vengeance into their hands for wrongs committed by a few of the emigrants who  were pronounced enemies of both whites and Indians.

 

It was a crime for which there can be no apology or excuse, a thing treacherous  and damnable in the extreme. But for the “Mormon” people it was most unfortunate  that it should happen at this particular time. There were circulating throughout  the nation many evil reports concerning the Latter-day Saints. All manner of  crimes and murders occurring within a thousand miles of Utah, were charged  against them. Even the executive of the nation and other high officials were  countenancing these reports and aiding in their circulation. The army was on the  plains making its way to Utah to suppress alleged violation of law and  rebellion; and now, to add to the horror of the situation, the report went forth  that the “Mormons” had attacked and killed a party of innocent people peacefully  passing through their land. Thus color was given to the falsehood that life and  property of “Gentiles” were unsafe within the Territory of Utah.1

 

It may be said without fear of successful contradiction, that there was less  crime committed in Utah during the days of pioneer life than in any other  similarly situated section of the country. California had her vigilantes who  executed judgment with swift vengeance, without legal trial. Such was also the  condition in other border states and territories, and woe to the individual who  incurred the wrath of the powers who controlled. The “Mormon” people had been  taught from the beginning: “Thou shalt not kill.” Murder, according to their  teaching, committed wantonly, was a sin for which there was no forgiveness in  this life, neither in the life to come. Next, and like unto it stood sexual  immorality. Both of these great sins were denounced by the Saints most  emphatically.

 

Crimes Falsely Charged to the Church Authorities

 

One thing most trying to the members of the Church was the attempt by their  enemies to charge Brigham Young and the leaders of the Church with every wrong  committed in the western country. These attempts led Jacob Forney, Indian Agent  in 1859, to write to Washington saying:

 

 “I fear, and I regret to say it, that with certain parties here there is a  greater anxiety to connect Brigham Young and other Church dignitaries with every  criminal offense than diligent endeavor to punish the actual perpetrators of  crime.”

 

How the Massacre Occurred

 

About the time the news arrived in Salt Lake City of the coming of an army,  there was passing through the city under command of Captain Fancher, a company  of emigrants from Arkansas and Missouri. This company consisted of about thirty  families, numbering one hundred and thirty-seven persons. The Arkansas emigrants  appeared to be respectable and well-to-do. With them there traveled a rough and  reckless company calling themselves “Missouri Wild Cats,” who conducted  themselves in keeping with the name. This company was advised by Elder Charles  C. Rich, one of the leaders of the Church, to take the northern route. Had they  done so they would have saved their lives. They went as far as Bear River and  then returned deciding to journey to the south. On their way, it is alleged, the  rougher element of the party abused the people of the southern settlements  through which they passed. They tore down fences, destroyed property, insulted  women, and otherwise made themselves obnoxious. It is said, on reliable  authority, that at Fillmore they threatened to destroy the town, “and boasted of  their participation in the murders and other outrages that were inflicted upon  the ‘Mormons’ in Missouri and Illinois.” At Corn Creek, fifteen miles farther to  the south, it was reported that they poisoned the springs and also the body of  an ox that had died. The carcass was eaten by a band of Piute Indians and ten of  their number died. Some of the cattle of the settlers died from drinking of the  poisoned springs. As the cattle were fat, the owners “tried them up” for the  tallow, and a number of white persons were poisoned from the handling of the  meat. These “Wild Cats” expressed their pleasure at the coming of the army, and  threatened to stop at some convenient place and leave their women and children,  and return to assist the troops in killing every “Mormon” there was in the  mountains.

 

Just to what extent credence can be placed in these charges cannot be  determined. The fact remains, however, that they gave expression to their hatred  of the “Mormon” people, made many threats, and abused the Indians along their  way.

 

The Purchase of Supplies

 

It has been said that these emigrants could not purchase supplies in Salt Lake  City and the other settlements of the Saints, and had been ordered away from  Salt Lake City by President Young. This is not the fact. President Young did not  know they were in the city and first heard of them after they had departed.  Along the way they did obtain supplies as they desired and as the Saints were  able to impart to them, as there is abundant evidence to show. They were well  treated by most of the settlers, and not until their own actions brought upon  them the ill will of the southern settlements was this attitude changed.

 

Word Sent to Brigham Young

 

So intense did the feeling become on the part of both the Indians and the white  population in the southern settlements that it was deemed necessary to send a  messenger to Governor Brigham Young to know what should be done. Some of the  people expressed the feeling that since the emigrants had declared themselves as  enemies they should be treated as such, but the more sober minded maintained  that they should be permitted to continue their journey to the coast unmolested.  James H. Haslam carried a message from Colonel Isaac Haight, of the militia, to  Salt Lake City to obtain advice of Governor Young. In the meantime it was agreed  that every effort should be made to pacify the Indians and prevent them from  making an attack. Haslam left Cedar City in the afternoon of Monday, September  7, and made all haste on horseback, arriving in Salt Lake City on the morning of  the 10th. He immediately delivered his message, and Governor Young asked him if  he could undertake the return journey without delay. He said he could. “Go with  all speed, spare no horse flesh. The emigrants must not be meddled with, if it  takes all Iron County to prevent it. They must go free and unmolested.” This was  the answer he received. Haslam, although he had just finished a hard journey,  immediately returned arriving in Cedar City on the 13th with a written message  from Governor Young to Colonel Haight.

 

The Answer Arrives Too Late

 

The message to Colonel Haight of the militia from Governor Young was as follows:

 

 “In regard to the emigration trains passing through our settlements, we must not  interfere with them until they are first notified to keep away. You must not  meddle with them. There are no other trains that I know of. If those who are  there will leave, let them go in peace.”

 

Colonel Isaac C. Haight read the letter, and shedding tears replied: “Too late,  too late!” The morning (September 7) Haslam left to obtain word from Governor  Young, the work of death among the unfortunate victims had commenced.

 

The Attack upon the Emigrant Train

 

Early in September the emigrant train of the Arkansas and Missouri companies  camped in the little valley known as the Mountain Meadows. There they  contemplated remaining for several days. In the meantime their conduct had  aroused the Indian tribes who now surrounded their camp in hostile attitude. As  near as can be ascertained, on the morning of the 7th of September at the break  of day, the attack upon the emigrants began. At the first volley seven men were  killed and sixteen were wounded. The victims were taken unawares, but being well  armed, fought bravely for their lives and were successful in repelling the  attack. Several Indians were killed including two of their chiefs. The Indians  sent runners throughout the surrounding country calling for reinforcements from  among their tribes, and for John D. Lee, who had been in close touch with Indian  affairs as their farmer, to come and lead them to victory. Lee hurried to the  scene from his home in Harmony, and seemed to partake of the frenzy of the  redmen. Later, other white men appeared upon the scene, having been lured to the  meadows, with the request that their services were needed in burying the dead.  Some of them remained, willingly or by coercion, to participate in the massacre  which followed.

 

The Surrender Treachery of Their Captors

 

During the lull following the first attack, the emigrants formed their wagons in  a ring and threw up breastworks for their protection, awaiting the onslaught  which they knew was sure to come. Some time was spent by the Indians and their  white allies discussing the fate of the unfortunate emigrants. The victims  discovered that white men were in league with the Indians, and this knowledge  sealed their fate. It was determined by those making the attack that no emigrant  should live who could tell the tale.

 

On the morning of Friday the 11th, Lee induced the emigrants to surrender under  promise of protection and conveyance to a place of safety. They were led to a  place where the Indians were in ambush, and at a given signal a volley of shots  rang out, both Indians and white men participating in the outrage. Seventeen  children of tender years  ranging in age from a few months to seven years were  all that were spared. These children were cared for by the settlers until the  government by act of Congress returned them to their friends in Arkansas.   A Bloody Oath

 

The white men who engaged in this horrible slaughter entered into a league, by a  strong and binding oath, that they would never reveal the part they played in  this gruesome tragedy. A false report was forwarded to Governor Young. Lee also  reported in person, laying the blame solely to the Indians. Governor Young wept  bitterly and was horrified at the recital of the tale.

 

The Execution of Lee

 

For several years the facts relating to the tragedy were unknown, but gradually  the truth leaked out and an investigation was made of the affair. John D. Lee  was excommunicated from the Church with the injunction from President Young that  under no circumstances should he ever be admitted as a member again. Action was  also taken against others as the truth became known. In later years Lee was  convicted of the crime and paid the penalty with his life. His execution took  place on the site of the horrid scene. Others who were implicated fled from the  territory and died fugitives. While they thus evaded the justice which earthly  tribunals might inflict, they still await the trial for their crime before a  Higher Court where justice never fails.

 

Notes

 

1.  “It may as well be understood at the outset that this horrible crime so  often and so persistently charged upon the “Mormon” Church and its leaders, was  the crime of an individual, the crime of a fanatic of the worst stamp, one who  was a member of the “Mormon” Church, but of whose intentions the Church knew  nothing, and whose bloody acts, the members of the Church, high and low, regard  with as much abhorrence as any out of the Church. Indeed, the blow fell upon the  brotherhood with threefold force and damage. There was the cruelty of it, which  wrung their hearts; and there was the strength it lent their enemies further to  malign and molest them. The “Mormons” denounce the Mountain Meadows Massacre,  and every act connected therewith, as earnestly and honestly as any in the  outside world. This is abundantly proved and may be accepted as a historical  fact. (Bancroft’s History of Utah, p. 544)

 

 Chapter 45 The Army in Utah. 1858 through 1862

 

Demoralizing Effects of the Army’s Presence

 

It was the part of wisdom for President Brigham Young and his associates to  insist on the camp of the army being far removed from Salt Lake City. It was  with reluctance that their commander complied with that request, which was  enforced by the peace commissioners. Very little good came to the people of Utah  from the presence in their midst, of an armed force, with all its attendant camp  followers. It is true that the people benefited in a financial way. They were  able to dispose of their products for ready cash and clothing; but they could  have managed to live as they did before the army came without these advantages,  which, of course, they were ready to receive.

 

There was no debauchery, no immorality or fear of thieves breaking in to steal,  in the communities of the Latter-day Saints, before the strangers to their faith  came in. With the army all these attendant evils were introduced. The worst  element with the army was, of course, the camp following the freighters and  hangers-on, who were not subject to the rigid discipline of army regulation.  Yet, much of the evil which resulted, can be traced to subordinate officers and  men of the ranks. With many of these, moral rectitude was a thing unknown; and  woe to the foolish creatures who, like flies caught in a spider-web, were lured  into camp.

 

To add to the difficulties, many of the enlisted men filled their term of  service and were discharged. Usually they were in possession of very little  means, and if a balance of pay was due them, it was soon squandered. Such  characters flocked to Salt Lake City and other towns, where they became a terror  to the inhabitants. Because of this, it became necessary to increase the police  force of Salt Lake City, at least four fold. Appeals were made to Governor  Cumming to get him to use his influence to have the discharged men marched  beyond the borders of the territory. The governor took the matter up with  General Johnston, with the result that the condition was relieved in this  respect to some small degree. However, the situation could not fully be  controlled by these officers, and as long as Camp Floyd (later Crittenden) was  occupied by the troops, demoralizing agencies were at work, and the people were  constantly in a state of agitation.

 

Governor Cumming’s Report

 

In reporting affairs in Utah to the Secretary of State, Governor Cumming made  the following observations:

 

 “Persons unbiased by prejudice who have visited this Territory will, I think,  agree in the opinion that a community is seldom seen more marked by quiet and  peaceable diligence than that of the Mormons.

 

“After the passage of the army, hundreds of adventurers were attracted to these  valleys, and met here some congenial spirits. Banded together for rapine and  acts of violence, they have stolen large herds of horses and mules. Many of  these men, maddened by intemperance, or rendered desperate by losses at the  gaming table, or by various other causes, have shed each other’s blood in  frequent conflicts, and secret assassinations. These lawless and bloody deeds  are committed by them almost daily with impunity, and when their atrocity and  frequency shock the public mind, it has become the custom with a certain set of  people to exclaim against the people of Utah; but it is an injustice to impute  the acts of these desperadoes to the community in general. With an equal show of  justice might they be attributed to the inhabitants of the States and  Territories whence these men have so recently emigrated.”

 

The New Federal Officers

 

Chief Justice Delano R. Eckels and the new secretary of the territory, John  Hartnett, arrived in Utah with the army. Jacob Forney, the superintendent of  Indian affairs, arrived with the peace commissioners, and Judge Charles E.  Sinclair and Attorney Alexander Wilson came near the end of July. The third  judge, John Cradlebaugh, did not arrive until November. None of these officers  were members of the Church.

 

After he had taken the oath of office, Chief Justice Eckels took up his  residence at Camp Floyd and Judge Sinclair made his headquarters in Salt Lake  City. Judge Cradlebaugh opened his court in Provo in March, 1859, although the  seat of his district was Fillmore.

 

“Progress of Civilization”

 

The majority of the government officials sent to Utah during territorial days  came obsessed with the idea that the “Mormons” were an unpatriotic and ignorant  class of people, bound by blind obedience to the will of a set of knaves who  presided over them. When a new government appointee came to Utah, usually he  felt it incumbent upon him to begin his labors with a lecture to the people on  loyalty and morality, and advise them to cast off the yoke of ignorance which  bound them. These would-be reformers at times gave expression to the thought  that they had brought civilization among the “Mormons” and were endeavoring to  reform them. At the time of the return to the east in 1858, of one official  who  had been notoriously corrupt and immoral in his conduct while in Utah  a number  of the civil and military officers and some non-“Mormon” merchants tendered him  a dinner. In the course of their hilarity they expressed the satisfaction he  would feel in joining his “family and friends in a moral and civilized  community.”

 

Such expressions as this led President Brigham Young, who was a sorrowful  witness of the scenes of debauchery and crime practiced by some of these  “reformers,” to say to another retiring official who was about to depart: “When  you get back to the states, no doubt you will be asked many questions about me.  I wish you would tell them that I am here, watching the progress of  civilization.”

 

That some of these individuals were sincere, there can be no question, and they  should have credit for honest conviction. However it was impossible for them to  see the situation from the “Mormon” viewpoint. They came with pre-conceived  ideas regarding the doctrines and practices of the Latter-day Saints, and were  greatly prejudiced against them. Their prejudice stood in their own light so  that they took no trouble to investigate or try to understand. In most cases it  was sufficient to know that the “Mormons” were a peculiar people with a strange  belief, in conflict with the doctrines of other people.

 

Many of these officers, however, were insincere. They were guilty of the very  sins with which they accused the Latter-day Saints, and yet they brazenly sat in  judgment and condemned the Saints, while they, themselves, were guilty of  revolting crimes.

 

Attitude of the Judges

 

Chief Justice Eckels was given to drunkenness and was grossly immoral; yet he  felt it his duty to advise that indictments be issued against the leaders of the  Church for the practice of plural marriage. He did not know just how to handle  the situation, for there were no statutes either in the territory or in the  United States to punish such a thing. Therefore he attempted to place the matter  under the old Mexican law which had no application in United States territory.

 

Associate Justice Sinclair, who was usually drunk, commenced his duties on the  bench by charging the grand jury of his court, to indict ex-Governor Brigham  Young, General Daniel H. Wells, and other “Mormon” leaders, for treason, on the  ground that President Buchanan’s pardon, “while a public act in the history of  the country,” yet it was a thing of which his court could not “take judicial  cognizance.” United States Attorney Alexander Wilson took a different view and  so expressed himself at length before the grand jury in open court, stating  “that there are now no acts of sedition, treason, or rebellion against the  government of the United States in this territory.” For that reason he would not  present bills or bring action against any inhabitant of the territory on such a  charge.

 

Bitterness of Cradlebaugh

 

Judge Cradlebaugh manifested a very bitter spirit against the leaders of the  Church. When he opened court at Provo, he made a demand on General Johnston for  several companies of troops from Camp Floyd, and a detachment was furnished him.  The reason the judge gave for this action was that the presence of the soldiers  was necessary to preserve the peace, and take care of the prisoners because  there was no jail in Provo. The real reason was a desire to insult the people of  the town and to intimidate witnesses before the court. Inside of two weeks there  were about one thousand men in arms surrounding the court house.

 

Protest of the Citizens

 

Instead of keeping the peace, the presence of the troops was a menace to the  peace of the town. Five hundred citizens righteously and vigorously protested  against the insult in an address to the mayor and city council. They declared  that their “feelings were aggrieved and outraged” by the appearance of a  military force surrounding the court and infesting the halls of justice, and  they considered it a “high handed outrage, a direct infringement upon the rights  of American citizens and a gross violation of their liberties and municipal  immunities.”

 

The judge was informed by the mayor and city council of the petition and was  asked for the immediate removal of the troops beyond the city limits. It was  declared that their presence made it very difficult for the officers of the city  to preserve the peace. The judge refused to listen to the appeal. Later another  vigorous protest was made by the city officials, who declared that soldiers had  been caught breaking into houses; they had engaged in drunken street brawls and  had otherwise disturbed the peace. However, Judge Cradlebaugh turned a deaf ear  to all appeals.

 

Governor Cumming’s Proclamation

 

Governor Cumming visited Provo in the month of March, and to him an appeal was  made by the mayor and council. The governor could see the situation for himself,  and forwarded a communication to General Johnston requesting him to withdraw the  troops. General Johnston refused to hearken to the request of the governor, on  the grounds that he was there to serve each of the coordinate branches of the  territorial civil government, and was subject to the judicial as well as to the  executive department. Upon this refusal of the commander of the troops, Governor  Cumming issued a proclamation protesting against the presence of the military  force which had been called to Provo without his sanction and contrary to the  instructions given him by the government. Their presence, said the governor, had  a tendency to terrify the inhabitants and disturb the peace. All future  movements of the troops should be at his direction in accordance with his  instructions from Washington.

 

Result of the Conflict

 

The result of this conflict in authority was that Judge Cradlebaugh and his  associate, Judge Sinclair, sent a communication to the attorney-general of the  United States, Jeremiah S. Black, in relation to the matter. Other letters were  sent by Judge Eckels to the secretary of state and by General Johnston to the  secretary of war. The secretary of state wrote to Governor Cumming for the facts  which were furnished. When the replies were received, the officious judges were  rebuked and given to understand that the armed forces in the territory were  subject to the command of the executive. Said the attorney general: “The  governor is the supreme executive of the territory. He is responsible for the  public peace. From the general law of the land, the nature of his office, and  the instructions he received from the state department, it ought to have been  understood that he alone had power to issue a requisition for the movement of  troops from one part of the territory to another.” He further stated that “the  condition of things in Utah made it extremely desirable that the judges  appointed for that territory should confine themselves strictly within their own  official sphere,” and leave accusations to the district attorney, and arrests to  the marshal, who was responsible for the safe-keeping of criminals.

 

Attempt to Remove Governor Cumming

 

The rebuke from Washington was naturally very displeasing to the judges, who  were thus confined to the duties of their office. In Camp Floyd there was  manifestation of displeasure. A mass meeting was held and an address was issued  in which the “Mormons” were accused of disloyalty and it was set forth that a  great wrong had been done in forcing the withdrawal of the troops from the  protection of the courts. The wrath of the disgruntled camp was also turned  against Governor Cumming, and the attempt was made to have him removed from  office. This might have been accomplished through the influence of General  Johnston, had not Colonel Thomas L. Kane once more come to the rescue.

 

Attack on President Young

 

When Judge Cradlebaugh organized his court at Provo, he expressed his  determination to investigate the Mountain Meadows massacre and other crimes.  This action would have been commendable if it had been taken with a desire to  execute justice, but it was a flagrant attempt to connect President Young and  the leading Church authorities with the crime. He inferred that the guilty  parties were among the leaders of the Church and should be brought to justice.  Later, accompanied by a United States deputy marshal and a detachment of troops,  he visited southern Utah and collected what evidence could be obtained  respecting the Mountain Meadows massacre, leaving no stone unturned in the  endeavor to implicate President Brigham Young and others, in which attempt he  miserably failed. Nevertheless, to the grand jury he said: “The very fact of  such a case as that of the Mountain Meadows shows that there was some person  high in the estimation of the people, and it was done by that authority; . .  .  and unless you do your duty, such will be the view that will be taken of it. You  can know no law but the laws of the United States and the laws you have here. No  person can commit crimes and say they are authorized by higher authorities, and  if they have any such notions they will have to dispel them.”

 

Cradlebaugh’s Insult to the Jury

 

As the grand jury failed to act with the promptness he thought they should, the  judge dismissed them “as an evidently useless appendage of a court of justice.”  This unjustifiable attack was resented by the grand jury in a written protest.

 

In a spirit of anger the judge dismissed criminals who were before his court  awaiting trial on grave charges, giving for his reason the following excuse:

 

 “When this people (‘Mormons’) come to their reason, and manifest a disposition  to punish their own high offenders, it will be time to enforce the laws also for  their protection. If this court cannot bring you to a proper sense of your duty,  it can at least turn the savages in custody loose upon you.”

 

Attempt to Capture President Young

 

Another attempt was made about this time to get President Young in the toils of  the law on a groundless charge. It appears that a number of criminals at Camp  Floyd plotted to rob the government. They hired a young engraver in Salt Lake  City to duplicate the plate used by the quartermaster at Camp Floyd in drawing  on the government at St. Louis and New York. The work was done, but the fraud  was detected, and a man by the name of Brewer was arrested. He turned state’s  evidence and threw the responsibility for the deed upon the engraver who had  been hired to do the work. As someone in the office of President Young had  furnished the paper on which the counterfeit notes were printed, the army  officers felt that they had a case against President Young, and manifested their  great pleasure at the prospect of implicating him. The officers entered into a  plot to secure his arrest. Thinking that an attempt to take him openly would  meet with resistance, the army was to be ordered to Salt Lake City and the  artillery was to make a breach in the wall surrounding his premises, through  which they would enter to secure President Young a captive, and then carry him  to Camp Floyd for trial.

 

Governor Cumming’s Stand

 

This plan was presented to Governor Cumming, who listened to the plotters and  examined their papers. “They rubbed their hands,” said the governor, “and were  jubilant; they had got the dead wood on Brigham Young. I was indignant, sir, and  told them, By   , gentlemen, you can’t do it! When you have a right to take  Brigham Young, gentlemen, you shall have him without creeping through walls. You  shall enter by his door with heads erect as becomes representatives of your  government. But till that time, gentlemen, you can’t touch Brigham Young.”

 

The plotters were greatly disappointed and returned to Camp Floyd threatening to  act in opposition to the executive. Because of these rumors, Governor Cumming  ordered General Daniel H. Wells to be prepared with the militia to repel any  such attack. It was a courageous thing for the governor to do in the face of the  strong feeling of opposition existing at Camp Floyd against President Young.

 

Departure of the Army

 

As long as the army remained in Utah, such conditions prevailed. In February,  1860, General Johnston departed from Camp Floyd to go to Washington. He went by  way of California and the Isthmus of Panama. Shortly after, he was found leading  an army of the South against an army of the North, in the war of the Rebellion,  endeavoring to destroy the Union. In the battle of Shiloh he was killed while  commanding the Confederate forces. In 1861, Camp Floyd, then called Fort  Crittenden, was abandoned.

 

Retirement of Governor Cumming

 

Governor Cumming departed from Utah in May, 1861, a short time before his term  of office expired, and returned to his old home in Georgia. His departure was  much regretted, for he had served the people faithfully and well, discharging  every obligation as he saw his duty, without fear or favor of men. The people  certainly had good reason for regret, as his successors quite generally were men  of a very different stamp.

 

The “Mormon” People and the Rebellion

 

The loyalty of the Latter-day Saints to the United States had frequently been  questioned by their enemies and those unacquainted with them. When the war of  the Rebellion broke out, the Saints again manifested their loyalty to the Union.  When the telegraph line across the continent was completed, in October, 1861,  President Brigham Young was courteously tendered the privilege of sending the  first message from Salt Lake City. It was to the president of the telegraph  company, Mr. J. H. Wade, as follows:

 

 “Sir: Permit me to congratulate you upon the completion of the Overland  Telegraph Lines west to this city, to commend the energy displayed by yourself  and associates in the rapid and successful prosecution of a work so beneficial;  and to express the wish that its use may ever tend to promote the true interests  of the dwellers upon both the Atlantic and Pacific slopes of our continent.

 

“Utah has not seceded, but is firm for the Constitution and laws of our once  happy country, and is warmly interested in such useful enterprises as the one so  far completed.”

 

In making his reply, President Wade expressed gratitude to President Young, that  his, the first message to pass over the line, “should express so unmistakably  the patriotism and union-loving sentiments” of himself and people.

 

In April, 1862, President Lincoln requested President Brigham Young to raise a  force of cavalry to guard the overland route, which was promptly done. Before  the request came, the offer was made by President Young to protect that route.

 

Moreover, while many states were endeavoring to get out of the Union, the  “Mormons” were petitioning Congress to get in. This privilege of state  government was denied them. The denial was very largely due to the hostile  attitude of the new officials, Governor Stephen S. Harding, and two of the  territorial judges, Charles B. Waite and Thomas J. Drake, who were decidedly  unfriendly to the people of the territory.

 

Other reasons given were the general feeling of opposition to the faith of the  Latter-day Saints especially against the practice of plural marriage, and the  belief, which still erroneously persisted, that they were disloyal. “An  un-American condition of affairs was supposed to exist here,” so writes Orson F.  Whitney, “hostile to the Government and subversive of morality and civilization.  Priestcraft, polygamy, and murder were thought to be the chief cornerstones of  ‘Mormonism.’ A union of Church and State was alleged. It was charged that the  ‘Mormon’ people were under the sway of an ecclesiastical despotism which  ‘overshadowed and controlled their opinions, actions, property, and lives,  penetrating and supervising social and business circles, and requiring implicit  obedience to the counsel of the Church, as a duty paramount to all the  obligations of morality, society, allegiance and law.’”1

 

Notes

 

1.  Whitney’s Popular History of Utah, page 183.

 

 Chapter 46 A Period of Strife and Bitterness. 1862 through 1870

 

The “Anti-Bigamy Law”

 

Instead of granting statehood in answer to the petition of the people of Utah,  Congress passed an “anti-bigamy law” in opposition to the practice of plural  marriage. It was presented to the house of representatives by Justin R. Morrill  of Vermont, but was instigated by Governor Harding and Judges Waite and Drake.  The bill the first of the kind to be placed on the statutes was signed by  President Lincoln, July 8, 1862. It defined plural marriage as bigamy, and made  the contracting of such a marriage punishable by a fine of five hundred dollars  and imprisonment for a term of five years. This law was considered by many  leading attorneys and others not “Mormons,” as being unconstitutional. It was  not enforced, President Lincoln’s policy being to let the “Mormons” alone. Among  the features which helped to make it inoperative was the provision, aimed at the  Church, forbidding religious bodies in territories to hold real estate in value  to exceed fifty thousand dollars. An effort was made by Governor Harding, in  1863, to have Brigham Young punished under this law. He was taken before Judge  Kinney and placed under bonds, but the grand jury failed to take action and the  case was dropped.

 

Attempted Legislation Against the “Mormons”

 

The governor and two judges went even further in their desire to obtain  legislation effecting the citizens of Utah. They entered into a conspiracy to  have removed many powers vested in the loyal officers and place them under  federal control. Among these changes they proposed that Congress limit the  powers of the county courts to the probating of wills, issuing titles of  administration and guardianship; place in the hands of the United States marshal  the power to summon jurors as he might think proper a thing that would have  proved very disadvantageous to the Saints and give the governor full power to  appoint all the officers of the militia, and designate the days when the  companies should drill. When this proposed legislation was presented in Congress  and it was learned who the authors were, it caused great indignation in Utah. A  mass meeting was held and the guilty officials were asked to resign, which they  refused to do. A petition was sent to Washington asking for their removal and  for the appointment of “good men in their stead.” A counter petition was sent  from the companies of California volunteers, who were stationed at the time in  the valley. While the people did not get all they asked for, the governor was  removed and James Duane Doty, superintendent of Indian affairs in the territory,  and a much better man, was chosen in his place.

 

The California Volunteers

 

Very soon after the departure of Johnston’s army, the people of Utah were  inflicted with the presence of other troops. These were volunteers from  California and Nevada, about seven hundred strong, who were detained in Salt  Lake City, as they were on their way to the East to take part in the Civil War.  They were under the command of Colonel (later General) Patrick Edward Connor,  who greatly desired to take active part in the war. He was a man whose loyalty  to the United States was of the highest order. When he was commanded to stay in  Utah, he was exceedingly disappointed. Secretary of War Edward Stanton who was  extremely distrustful of the “Mormons” stationed Colonel Connor at Salt Lake  City ostensibly to guard the telegraph and mail route, but more particularly to  watch the “Mormons.” Connor established his headquarters on the foothills east  of Salt Lake City, naming the place Camp Douglas, in honor of Stephen A.  Douglas. He was extremely prejudiced against the Latter-day Saints, and lost no  occasion to manifest his bitter feelings in public or in private; so obsessed  was he that “no good thing could come out of Utah.” Every word, every action of  the “Mormons,” was falsely interpreted; and provocation given by him to  antagonize the leaders of the Church whom he considered to be disloyal.

 

The Union Vedette

 

Under his direction an anti-“Mormon” paper edited by Captain Charles H.  Hempstead was published at Camp Douglas and later in the city. It was called the  Union Vedette, the mission of which was to fight “Mormonism.” Connor also  attempted to establish military rule instead of civil authority, thus depriving  the citizens of their rights.

 

Mining in Utah

 

To Patrick E. Connor is given credit for starting the mining industry in Utah.  His motives, however, were not entirely commendable. If he is to be judged by  his own words, his main purpose was not to “get gain” or to increase the  circulation of the precious metals, but to cause an influx of “a large Gentile  and loyal population sufficient by peaceful means and through the ballot-box to  overwhelm the Mormons by mere force of numbers, and thus wrest from the  Church disloyal and traitorous to the core the absolute and tyrannical control  of temporal and civil affairs.”

 

He was acquainted with the fact that President Young had advised the Saints to  develop the industries of agriculture and establish needful factories that they  might be self-sustaining, and leave mining alone for later consideration. This  advice was very wise, for in the days of pioneer life, and when the commonwealth  was young, it was necessary that the people be able to support themselves. They  could not live on gold and silver, but they could on the products of the soil;  and they could keep warm from the spinning of wool and the manufacture of cloth  out of which to make their clothing. The advice of President Young was the  advice which governed the Pilgrims when they landed on the shores of America;  but it seemed to be very distasteful and unpatriotic to men of little souls. All  goods brought to the territory from abroad, before the advent of the railroad,  had to be hauled by team upwards of a thousand miles, and with the constantly  increasing population, all hands were needed to labor in producing what the  people consumed. Even then, for a long time it was a difficult task, for several  years were extremely lean due to the ravages of grasshoppers and crickets, and  because of other obstacles unforeseen.

 

If the Saints had run off to develop mines, they would have sealed their own  doom in the days of their pioneering. Moreover, the experience of the past, in  1849 and subsequently, when the California gold rush was on, taught them that  the development of the mining industry would bring to the territory the riffraff  and scum of humanity. This would mean the increase of crime and decrease of law  and order.

 

Why the Latter-day Saints Settled in Utah

 

The Latter-day Saints came to the valleys of the mountains primarily to worship  the Lord and to keep his commandments; also to develop a peaceful commonwealth  where others of their faith might be gathered to enjoy the fruits of their  labors without molestation.

 

The False Attitude of General Connor

 

The attitude of General Connor, and all who agreed with him, was basely false.  Brigham Young was not opposed to the development of mines, but he was farsighted  enough to understand which many of his petty critics could not understand that  there were other duties more important and substantial, which held precedence,  at least in the lives of the Latter-day Saints, in the development of the  territory. It should be said to the credit of General Patrick E. Connor, who  manifested so much bitterness in the early sixties, that after remaining in Utah  for several years, his feelings towards the “Mormon” people greatly softened.  When it did become possible for a ray of light and truth to penetrate his  prejudices, he discovered that the Latter-day Saints were not such disloyal  citizens after all.

 

Inspiration of Brigham Young

 

President Brigham Young was a practical man by nature, but, aided by the  inspiration of the Spirit of the Lord, his wisdom in the establishment of  cities, villages, and industries, was far beyond his human possibilities. On  many an occasion when the settlers of a selected site had chosen the low lands  near the center of the valleys, he instructed them to move higher up near the  foothills; and at times against their judgment settlers were advised to move to  less favorable looking land than that which they had chosen. Time has proved  that their leader was possessed of the inspiration which he was entitled to  receive.

 

Home Industries

 

From the very beginning of Utah’s history, President Young taught the people the  necessity of establishing home industries and becoming self supporting. In these  various ventures, he invariably took the lead. In the very earliest times, he  advocated the cultivation of cotton in the “Dixie” land; the building of mills  and factories; the harnessing of the mountain streams for power; and the  development of the natural resources of the country which would be of material  benefit to the people. His discourses were not confined to spiritual themes, but  were ofttimes devoted to the building of roads and fences, the cultivation of  the soil, the planting of vineyards and orchards, the raising of sheep and  cattle, and all other useful things which would tend to encourage the members  of the Church in obtaining temporal blessings, that they might live in comfort  and prosperity. Had the people always followed his advice, it would have been  better for them.

 

Plotters Against the Peace

 

Due to the malicious activities of many territorial officials, and the constant  desire on the part of others not of the Church who came to Utah, to “civilize”  and “reform” the Latter-day Saints, feelings of unfriendliness existed between  members of the Church and “outsiders.” The continued attacks made by General  Connor and Captain Hempstead, the editor of the Union Vedette, upon the Church  and its authorities, had a tendency to increase this feeling. During, and after  the close of the Civil War, Utah was infested with a set of characters who  seemed determined to make trouble. The “Gentile” population at that time was  about three hundred, the majority of whom were honorable citizens, but among  them were to be found many bitter enemies of the Church, bent upon its  destruction. Some of the latter had gone into business hoping to receive the  patronage of the Latter-day Saints, but at the same time they were plotting  against the Church, which they bitterly hated.

 

The Killing of Brassfield

 

To add to the unfortunate condition which divided the people, there occurred in  Salt Lake City, in 1866, two shocking murders. The first of these was the  killing of S. Newton Brassfield, a freighter, who came to Utah from Nevada. He  induced a plural wife to forsake her husband while the husband was in the  mission field. Brassfield then married the woman, the ceremony being performed  by Judge Solomon P. McCurdy of the Supreme Court of Utah. It was stated on good  authority that Brassfield had deserted his wife and family before he came to  Utah. This charge was denied by some of his defenders but strongly affirmed by  individuals who claimed to speak from personal knowledge. One evening in April,  as he was entering his boarding house, he was shot and killed by some person who  made his escape in the dark and was never discovered.

 

The Robinson Murder

 

The second killing was that of Dr. J. King Robinson who was decoyed from his  home, one night in October, under the pretext that his professional services  were needed. A short distance from his home he was set upon by a band of  ruffians and severely beaten and then killed. The motive for the crime remains a  mystery. Dr. Robinson had been in controversy with the city corporation over  property, but the matter had been settled by the supreme court of Utah in favor  of the city and could not have been the basis for the murder. It is presumed by  some that his assailants did not intend to take his life, but merely administer  to him a severe beating for some personal or fancied wrong; but being  recognized, they determined on killing him for their protection.

 

According to the custom of the times, the attempt was made to fasten the  responsibility for these murders upon the authorities of the Church. Such  accusations were openly made by prominent attorneys at the investigation of the  Robinson murder. Naturally President Young was indignant, and challenged his  traducers to produce their proof. He was ready to go to court, be examined, and  have the most thorough investigation made that the country could furnish. He  denounced the crime as on a par with the killing of Joseph and Hyrum Smith, the  Haun’s Mill massacre and the tragedy at Mountain Meadows. Rewards were offered  for the arrest, by the city, the county, and by private subscription, amounting  to the sum of nine thousand dollars. President Young headed the list with five  hundred dollars. When the effort failed to connect the authorities of the Church  with the crime, the ardor of some who had been most insistent that the guilty  parties be punished, cooled considerably and they lost interest in the case.

 

General Sherman to Brigham Young

 

Following the Brassfield killing, reports were sent out through the country  blaming the homicide on the “Mormon” people. General William T. Sherman, then  stationed at St. Louis, wired President Brigham Young stating that “responsible  officers” had informed him that four “Gentiles” had been murdered by “Mormons.”  As Utah was under his military jurisdiction, he declared that he was bound to  give protection to all citizens and murders must be punished and wrongs avenged,  if “committed against any American citizens even in remote Utah.”

 

President Young’s Answer

 

In replying to General Sherman’s telegram, President Young thanked him for the  opportunity of presenting the facts. He said, dispatches sent from Utah to the  East were not reliable; there had been no such assassinations as the General had  been led to believe. “On May 17, a soldier shot a gentleman named Mayfield, and  a Mr. Brassfield came home and seduced a Mormon’s wife, and was shot on the  street by some unknown person; but neither I nor the community at large knew any  more about it than an inhabitant of St. Louis. Citizens who are not of our faith  do not suffer from intimidation here. In no other communities could men pursue  the course many do here without experiencing the vengeance of a vigilance  committee.” President Young closed his telegram as follows: “There are a few  speculators here who are anxious to make it appear that American citizens’ lives  are in danger through religious fanaticism, hoping thereby to have troops sent  here to make money out of contracts. Gentiles’ lives are as safe here as  ‘Mormons’ and acts of violence occur more rarely in this city than any other of  its size in any of the new States or Territories.”

 

Citizens of Utah to General Sherman

 

Another telegram was sent by prominent “Gentile” citizens of Utah, confirming  the telegram of President Young. Among the signers were some of the leading  business men and officers from Camp Douglas. General Sherman replied to  President Young as follows: “Sir: Your dispatch is received and I am much  gratified at its substance and spirit.”

 

A Proposed “Gentile” Exodus

 

Due to the bitterness existing in Utah, President Brigham Young counseled the  “Mormon” people not to patronize business institutions which were run by the  enemies of the people. This was as a matter of self-defence and preservation.  The result of this counsel was that a communication from “Gentile” merchants and  addressed to the Church authorities, was received in which they agreed to leave  the territory on certain conditions. Their conditions were as follows: The  Church would guarantee the payment of their outstanding accounts owing to them  by the members of the Church, and the purchase of their merchandise, chattles,  houses, improvements, etc., at a cash valuation, after a deduction of  twenty-five per cent had been made from the total amount. “To the fulfilment of  the above,” said they, “we hold ourselves ready at any time, to enter into  negotiations, and on final arrangement being made and terms of sale complied  with, we shall freely leave the Territory.”

 

President Young Answers the Merchants

 

In a signed communication dated Dec. 21, 1866, President Young declined to  entertain their offer. He kindly pointed out to them that if they could secure  such sales, they would make more money than merchants had ever made before, and  perhaps “Mormon” merchants would like to sell out on the same kind of terms.  They were at liberty to remain or go, just as they pleased; no intimidation or  coercion had been used in the community to have them stop trading with any  class, and no man had been ostracised because he was not of the “Mormon” faith.  Every man who had dealt fairly and honestly, and confined his attention to his  legitimate business, whatever his creed, had found friendship among the  Latter-day Saints. “To be adverse to Gentiles, or Jews, because they are Jews,”  said President Young, “is in direct opposition to the genius of our religion. It  matters not what a man’s creed is . . . he will receive kindness and friendship  from us, and we have not the least objection to doing business with him; if in  his dealings he acts in accordance with the principles of right and deport  himself as a good, law-abiding citizen should.”

 

Attention was called to the fact that there were those doing business in the  territory who for years had been the avowed enemies of the community. The  disrupture and overthrow of the Church had been the object of their labors.  “Missionaries of evil, there have been no arts too base, no stratagems too vile  for them to use to bring about their nefarious ends,” said President Young.  While soliciting the patronage of the people, from whom they drew their support,  they had used their means thus derived “in the most shameless and abandoned  manner,” to destroy the very people whose favor they found it to their interest  to court. They had “fostered vice and vicious institutions to oppose the  unanimously expressed will of the people, to increase disorder, and to change  the city from a condition of peace and quietude to lawless anarchy.” The  question was asked what claims such persons could have upon the patronage of the  community, and what community on the earth “would be so besotted as to uphold  and foster men whose aim is to destroy them.” In closing his epistle, President  Young declared: “It is to oppose these men whom I have described, and to these  alone that I am opposed, and I am determined to use my influence to have the  citizens here stop dealing with them and deal with honorable men.”

 

Two days later in a discourse before the Saints, President Young said: “We  advise you to pass by the shops and stores of your enemies and let them alone,  but give your means into the hands of men who are honest men, honorable men, and  upright men men who will deal justly and truly with all. Shall we deal with the  Jew? Yes. With those who call themselves Gentiles? Certainly. We calculate to  continue to deal with them.”1

 

Building of the Tabernacle

 

In 1867 the Salt Lake Tabernacle which was begun in 1863, was completed. It is  one of the most remarkable buildings in the world. The building is elliptical in  shape and is one hundred and fifty feet wide and two hundred and fifty feet in  length. The roof is a self-supporting wooden structure, which was originally  fastened together without nails, wooden pins and rawhide being used in lieu  thereof. It rests upon buttresses of red sandstone set about twelve feet apart.  The acoustic powers are marvelous. The building also contains a pipe organ which  was the largest in the world, when built. The organ was originally the work of  Joseph Ridges, of Salt Lake City, and was made out of native timber. Since the  time of its construction it has been remodeled and kept in constant repair.

 

The October Conference 1867

 

The October Conference of the Church in 1867, was held in the new Tabernacle  which was nearing completion. On this occasion one hundred and sixty-three  persons were called to go and strengthen the settlements in southern Utah, and  the Saints were called on to assist in the gathering of the poor from Great  Britain and other foreign lands. Elder Joseph F. Smith, son of Patriarch Hyrum  Smith, was called to fill a vacancy in the council of the twelve, caused by the  apostasy of Amasa M. Lyman.

 

The Deseret Telegraph

 

At a special conference of the Church held April 10, 1865, it was agreed to  build a telegraph line throughout the settlements in Utah. The members of the  Church were called upon to assist in this worthy undertaking. Between the years  1865 and 1867, five hundred miles of line were constructed at a cost of one  hundred and fifty dollars per mile. This placed the principal settlements of the  territory in ready communication with Salt Lake City. Towns in Idaho and Nevada  were also reached. By means of this telegraph line, the authorities of the  Church  for it was a Church enterprise were able to facilitate their business  and save many miles of weary travel and great expense, in the forwarding of  instructions to the people. This line remained under the control of the Church  until 1900, when it was merged into the Western Union System.

 

Death of President Heber C. Kimball

 

President Heber C. Kimball, first counselor to President Brigham Young, died in  Salt Lake City, June 22, 1868. He was one of the original members called into  the council of the twelve, and the “father” of the British Mission. President  Kimball was greatly blessed with the spirit of prophecy; was bold and fearless,  and never faltered in his integrity to the truth.

 

At the general conference in October, George A. Smith of the council of the  twelve, and cousin of the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch Hyrum Smith, was chosen  and sustained to fill the vacancy in the First Presidency. Brigham Young Jr.,  was sustained as one of the apostles, succeeding Elder Smith in that body.

 

The Coming of the Railroad

 

Another great change in Utah was brought to pass in the completion of the  trans-continental railway. The railroad, together with the telegraph which  spanned the country from sea to sea, brought the people of the territory in  closer communication with the outside world. Isolation of the people of the  Great Basin was now a thing of the past. Under the direction of President Young,  much of the grading, especially from Echo Canyon to Ogden, the most difficult  part of the way, was done by members of the Church. The last spike uniting the  East and the West with bands of steel, was driven at the junction of the two  roads the Central Pacific and the Union Pacific at Promontory, Utah, May 10,  1869. There was assembled on that occasion a great concourse of people,  numbering eleven hundred souls. The officials of both roads, and many leading  men, including newspaper representatives from all parts of the country, had come  by train from East and West to witness this wonderful epoch in our American  history.

 

The Utah Local Lines

 

The trans-continental railways passed through Ogden. When it was contemplated  that Salt Lake City would not be on the line, President Young remarked: “If the  company which first arrives should deem it to their advantage to leave us out in  the cold, we will not be so far off, but we can have a branch line for the  advantage of this city.” The same day that the Union Pacific road finished  laying rails in Ogden there was organized in Salt Lake City, the Utah Central  Railway. This road and subsequently other local roads in Utah, were promoted by  President Young and other members of the Church. In May, 1869, ground was  broken, President Young removing the first earth, and the last spike on this  road between Salt Lake City and Ogden was driven January 10, 1870. The Utah  Central Railway connected Salt Lake City with the outside world, and proved to  all people, that there was no desire on the part of the Latter-day Saints to be  exclusive and isolated from their fellowmen. No longer were immigrants to come  by handcart and ox-team.

 

Proposed Anti-“Mormon” Legislation

 

The unfavorable attitude of certain merchants and others towards the Church  naturally resulted in a movement for self-protection. The coming of the railroad  was looked upon by the enemies of the Latter-day Saints as a means by which the  “redemption” of the territory from “Mormon” dominion was to be brought to pass.  They declared with a feeling of delight that when Utah was connected with the  outside world by rail, there would come such an influx of “Gentiles” that the  “Mormon” population would be overwhelmed. There were many open threats, and that  too, by officials, that when that time should come there would be instituted a  crusade against the members of the Church to deprive them of their liberties.  The Saints were wrongfully accused of being opposed to the coming of the  railroad because they feared such a result. The fact, however, was that  President Young and the presiding brethren did all in their power to have the  road pass through Salt Lake City rather than Ogden. Mass meetings were held and  every endeavor made to accomplish this purpose, and when it failed, President  Young headed a movement, as stated, to make connection by building a railroad  from Salt Lake City to Ogden.

 

The Wade and Cragin Bills

 

Nor did these individuals who opposed the Church wait for the coming of the  railroad to commence their determined effort to deprive the people of their  inherent rights. Appeals were made to Congress, and bills, having their origin  within the territory, were presented intended to curtail the liberties of the  people. In 1866 a measure was presented, known as the Wade Bill, providing for  the destruction of local government in the territory. This was followed by the  Cragin Bill in 1869, following the same lines, but still more drastic. The  intent of these measures was to place in the hands of the governor the sole  power to appoint and commission all the local officers in the territory, and  remove the people from a voice in government. All juries, grand and petit, were  to be selected by the United States marshal. For a “Mormon” minister to  solemnize a marriage was to be a criminal act, the property of the Church,  excepting twenty thousand dollars, was to be taxed, and the Church be denied  from making rules and regulations respecting fellowship of its members. The  governor of the territory was to become the financial head of the Church, though  not a member, and the trustee-in-trust, under heavy penalty of fine and  imprisonment, was required to make full and complete and annual reports to that  individual accounting for “all Church properties, moneys in banks, notes,  deposits with the Church,” etc. All this, and more, was contemplated in free  America where “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” are guaranteed as  inalienable rights.

 

The Cullom Bill

 

A few days later another bill just as radical in its features was presented in  Congress by Shelby M. Cullom, of Illinois, and was substituted for the Cragin  Bill by consent of Mr. Cragin. This measure was prepared by Robert N. Baskin of  Salt Lake City, one of the most bitter and inconsiderate enemies ever arrayed  against the Church. Fortunately for the Latter-day Saints, none of these  measures were at the time enacted into law.

 

Co-operation for Defense

 

The attitude of local anti-“Mormons,” coupled with the proposed unfavorable and  inhuman legislation, naturally drove the members of the Church closer together.  It was proposed in self-protection that there be organized throughout the  various settlements a chain of co-operative stores, and that the people trade  with each other rather than with their enemies. And if the proposed threats were  to be fulfilled, the enemies of the Church who came to Utah to do business would  have to bring their customers with them, for the Saints would not patronize  them. Based upon this proposition a parent institution was established in Salt  Lake City, in which all the “Mormon” people were invited to take stock. This  commercial house, known as Zion’s Co-operative Mercantile Institution, opened  its doors for business in 1869, and the following year was incorporated. In a  circular announcing their intentions it was stated by the brethren that they  were “convinced of the impolicy of leaving the trade and commerce of the  territory to the conduct of strangers,” and therefore “it was advisable that the  people of Utah should become their own merchants” and “unite in a system of  co-operation for the transaction of their own business.” In this way there could  be a consolidation of the mercantile stores in which all the people might be  interested, and receive their merchandise based on a small margin of profit.  Branches were established in nearly every settlement and were beneficial to the  people while that condition lasted.

 

A Change of Feeling

 

Fortunately there has been a change of feeling in the land and the necessity for  such a movement has departed. However, while the full object of the co-operative  movement was not accomplished it was a factor for the leveling of prices and the  destruction of what has been spoken of so commonly in later years the  “profiteer.” Before the advent of this great institution there were merchants in  the land who endeavored from time to time to “corner the market” on certain  necessities, and then charge exorbitant prices for their goods. This, of  course, could not be accomplished when a large institution, established in the  interests of the people, endeavored to protect their interests. The principle of  co-operation, no matter where applied, is right, and should be encouraged; but  many of these local institutions passed out of existence through the lack of  interest on the part of many of the people, who disposed of their stock to other  and more enterprising individuals, until the system was destroyed.2

 

Protest of “Mormon” Women Against Legislation

 

Early in January, 1870, a number of meetings were held by the women in various  communities in protest against the pending legislation (the Cragin and Cullom  bills) in Congress affecting “Mormonism.” On the 13th of the month a mass  meeting of several thousand “Mormon” women was held in the tabernacle. Great  enthusiasm pervaded the gathering. While they opposed all the features of the  anti-“Mormon” legislation, their action was principally in protest against the  measures, and the remarks of would-be reformers, in which the women of the  Church were spoken of as being “down-trodden” and “degraded” by their  husband-oppressors. Sarah M. Kimball, president of the Relief Society of the  Fifteenth Ward, presided at the meeting. Stating the object of the gathering she  said, “We are not here to advocate woman’s rights, but man’s rights. The bill in  question would not only deprive our fathers, husbands and brothers of the  privilege bequeathed to citizens of the United States, but it would also deprive  us, as women, of the privilege of selecting our husbands, and against this we  unqualifiedly protest.” Similar remarks of protest were made by several  prominent women and a set of resolutions were unanimously and enthusiastically  adopted; among them the following:

 

 “Resolved, That we, the ladies of Salt Lake City, in mass-meeting assembled, do  manifest our indignation, and protest against the bill before Congress, known as  ‘the Cullom Bill,’ also the one known as ‘the Cragin Bill,’ and all similar  bills, expressions and manifestoes.

 

“Resolved, That we consider the above named bills foul blots on our national  escutcheon absurd documents atrocious insults to the honorable executive of the  United States Government, and malicious attempts to subvert the right of civil  and religious liberty.  . . .

 

“Resolved, That we acknowledge the institutions of the Church of Jesus Christ of  Latter-day Saints as the only reliable safeguard of female virtue and innocence;  and the only sure protection against the fearful sin of prostitution, and its  attendant evils, now prevalent abroad, and as such, we are and shall be united  with our brethren in sustaining them against each and every encroachment.”

 

Many other meetings of this nature were held in other settlements in protest  against the passage of these bills, which caused great surprise and astonishment  throughout the nation.

 

Woman Suffrage

 

According to the doctrines of the Church, woman has always been granted the  privilege of a voice in the affairs of the organization. All matters of  importance as well as the sustaining of the various officers, are regularly  presented to the membership women and men alike for their suffrage, or vote. The  Church gave to its women the first exclusively women’s organization in all the  world; and it was representatives of this organization in mass-meeting  assembled, who entered their vigorous protest against the pending legislation  which was intended to affect them seriously in their lives.

 

Within about one month from the time of this meeting of protest, the legislature  of Utah passed an act granting to the women of the territory the right of  franchise which became a law by the approval of Acting Governor S. A. Mann. Such  privileges granted to the women had previously been proposed by those opposed to  “Mormonism,” who thought that the women were oppressed and this would be a means  of redeeming them from “the galling yoke” under which they were “oppressed.”

 

“The New Movement”

 

In the fall of 1869 a number of prominent elders were excommunicated for  apostasy, by the high council of the Salt Lake Stake. Among the number were  William S. Godbe, Elias L. T. Harrison, Eli B. Kelsey, and later Henry W.  Lawrence, Thomas B. H. Stenhouse and others. Mr. Godbe was a merchant, and a  prominent member of one of the quorums of Seventy as was also Mr. Harrison,  whose business was that of an architect. Eli B. Kelsey had performed good and  faithful service in the mission field abroad, until through immoral  transgression he lost the spirit of the work. These men had become disaffected  for various causes and now opposed many of the policies of President Young. They  accused him of trying to set up in the Church a “Young dynasty,” and of being  guilty of “one man power,” and they rebelled against his teaching regarding the  opening of the mines and the establishment of mercantile institutions. Mr.  Harrison, a gifted writer, had been editing the Utah Magazine which now became  the organ of the disaffected brethren. These men still claimed to believe in  much of “Mormonism” but centered their attack on President Young, publishing  articles reflecting upon him by comparison and innuendo. At first they declared  they would set up an organization of their own a new Church retaining all the  good features of “Mormonism” and discarding all that were bad. A presiding  officer and apostles were to be chosen, and the Church was to be “redeemed”  from the sad condition into which these disaffected persons claimed it had  fallen. This attempt at “reformation” is known in history as “the New Movement,”  or the “Godbeite Movement,” because of the prominent part William S. Godbe  played in it; but they called it “The Church of Zion.” For a time they held  meetings in the Thirteenth Ward, by permission of President Young; but the  organization which was without a head, and as Elder Whitney says, “with very  little body,” soon passed away.

 

Organization of the Liberal Party

 

Desiring some organization in which “Mormonism” might be opposed, these  excommunicated members joined with the anti-“Mormons” of the territory in the  formation of a political party, the object of which was to fight the Church.  “The Liberal Political Party,” as it was called, was organized in February,  1870. From that time forth until the organization was dissolved in the nineties,  it carried on an unscrupulous warfare against the Church. Those who controlled  its destiny were guilty of the most bitter and relentless actions that could be  imagined. Misrepresentation, falsehood and deceit were the chief weapons of  attack; and by such methods the name of the Church was maligned and its officers  placed in a false light before the world. The history of this political  organization is almost without a parallel, at least nothing like it has ever  occurred elsewhere in free republican America; only as it has been produced by  those opposed to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in these  valleys of the mountains. Nothing like it would be tolerated anywhere else in  all the world.

 

The Salt Lake Tribune

 

In January, 1870, the “Godbeites” commenced publishing a paper which they called  the Mormon Tribune; it was the Utah Magazine, transformed, and was published in  the interest of their movement. Dropping the word “Mormon” it became the organ  of the Liberal Party, and the following year passed into other hands more  vicious. “Its only principle, apparently, was hatred of everything Mormon,”  writes Historian Whitney, “in pursuance of which it spared neither age, sex nor  condition; emptying the vials of its venom upon all who dared to differ from it,  misrepresenting their motives, assailing their characters, and libeling and  lampooning both the living and the dead. Its columns were not only filled  habitually with falsehood, but often with vulgar and obscene scandals. Many who  helped to sustain the paper either from sympathy with its assaults upon  Mormonism, or from fear of being abused by it and called ‘Jack-Mormons’ if they  withheld their support, were careful to have it delivered at their down-town  offices, and would not have it in their homes for their wives and daughters to  read, so filthy at times were its contents. The Nauvoo Expositor was holy writ  compared with the Salt Lake Tribune.3 It had been justly said of this sheet that  it was “brought into the world to lie and was true to its mission.”

 

Notes

 

1.  The Gentile merchants were scarcely complimentary to the intelligence of  President Young when they made this proposition to withdraw from the Territory  on the conditions named by them. If the Gentile claim that there was utter  incompatibility between Mormon and non-Mormon in Utah could have been emphasized  by a spectacular exodus of Gentile merchants from Utah, however brought about,  it doubtless would have given occasion for another Utah expedition to the  Territory or such other military display as would have inured to the benefit of  speculators, contractors, and merchants, or to the long-hoped-for further  prescription of the Latter-day Saints. Surely the Gentile merchants should have  known if their action had such motive as this, that Brigham Young would have  detected it; and if not, if their proposed exodus was honest and meant only that  they intended to withdraw from an unpleasant situation, to end merely in their  personal advantage, then they should have known that Brigham Young would know  that the people of the United States would read into the facts of the exodus all  the evidence they would need of the alleged incompatibility, to justify, from  their viewpoint, all the coercive measures against the Mormon community for  which their enemies were clamoring. Brigham Young could not fail to apprehend  the danger, and accordingly avoid it (History of the Mormon Church, ch. 106, p.  464, B. H. Roberts).

 

2.  As early as 1864 a co-operative movement was inaugurated in Brigham City by  Elder Lorenzo Snow. It was attended with success and grew into a flourishing  institution which existed for a number of years. Other ventures preceding the  establishment of Z.C.M.I. as the great parent institution is generally  called were established at Lehi, American Fork and other towns, in 1868.

 

3.  History of Utah, vol. 2:380 through 1.

 

 Chapter 47 The Mission of Governor Shaffer and Judge McKean. 1870 through 1877

 

Governor Shaffer

 

Following the removal of Governor Harding in 1863, Utah was blessed for a time  with the presence of governors who were inclined to attend to the duties of  their office without much interference with “Mormonism.” Governors James Duane  Doty and Charles Durkee had held the office and S. A. Mann, secretary of the  territory, served as acting governor following the resignation of Governor  Durkee in 1869, until the appointee of President Ulysses S. Grant arrived in the  territory in the spring of 1870. This was J. Wilson Shaffer of Illinois, who  proved to be the most bitter and bigoted anti-“Mormon” governor Utah ever had.  He was in his forty-third year when he came to Utah, and was suffering from  consumption, contracted while serving in the Civil War. He was a man of  determined will, and evidently was sincere in his conviction that the “Mormons”  were more than “rebels,” who needed the drastic treatment which by some was  considered proper and necessary treatment for the South, during the days of  reconstruction. He came to Utah with a bias against the Latter-day Saints which  nothing short of a miracle could remove. “Never after me, by   ,” said he,  “shall it be said Brigham Young is governor of Utah.” In this expression he  displayed his ignorance of the conditions in Utah a mistake made by many  others that because the Latter-day Saints hearkened to the counsels of President  Young who, as their inspired leader, directed them as members of the Church, he  was usurping the prerogatives of the executive. If these men had been broad  enough they might have seen that President Young respected the civil authority  at all times, even when sorely abused and tried by the petty acts of  presumptuous and bigoted officials, who did all in their power to annoy and  humiliate him before the people.

 

Removal of Secretary Mann and Judge Wilson

 

The anger of Governor Shaffer was kindled against Secretary Mann because he, as  acting governor, signed the woman suffrage bill and endeavored to show some just  consideration for the majority of the people. Likewise he displayed feelings of  resentment against Chief Justice Charles A. Wilson because he would not subvert  the law in favor of the anti-“Mormon” “ring” to the disadvantage of the people.  Wilson was accused of exercising too much leniency towards the “Mormons,” so he,  like Secretary Mann, was removed through the influence of the governor.

 

The Coming of Judge McKean

 

To succeed the deposed officials, Vernon H. Vaughan was sent to Utah as  secretary of the territory and Judge James B. McKean to be chief justice. O. F.  Strickland and C. M. Hawley were also appointed associate justices to fill  vacancies which existed. Judge McKean, like Governor Shaffer, was a relentless  anti-“Mormon,” bigoted and narrow. He came to Utah with a “mission,” said he,  “as high above my mere duty as a judge, as the heaven is above the earth.” That  “mission” was the overthrow of “Mormonism.” However, Judge McKean is gone, and  “Mormonism” still survives and prospers.

 

Influence on Schuyler Colfax and Rev. Newman

 

The appointment of these bigoted and narrow-souled officials was largely due to  the influence of Vice-President Schuyler Colfax and Rev. John P. Newman. The  former had visited Utah on two occasions; first in 1865, when he was speaker of  the house of representatives, and again in 1869, when he was holding the office  of vice-president in the administration of U. S. Grant. He was associated with  an organized “ring” of anti-“Mormon” agitators and politicians, who were bent on  the destruction of “Mormon” dominion in Utah. On each visit he had shown marked  opposition to the Church. Rev. Newman was President Grant’s minister, and was  also chaplain of the United States Senate.

 

Governor Shaffer and the Militia

 

By act of the Utah Legislature in 1852, the militia, under the title of the  “Nauvoo Legion,” met in annual muster. In keeping with the law, Lieutenant  General Daniel H. Wells issued an order August 16, 1870, calling for a three  days’ muster, for the purpose of inspection, drill and camp duty. Governor  Shaffer was absent from the territory at the time, but as soon as he returned he  issued a counter order forbidding any muster, or drill, or gathering of any  military organization within the territory, except upon his orders. He also  illegally appointed Patrick E. Connor major general of the militia, and William  N. Johns, colonel and assistant adjutant general, and directed that all arms and  munitions belonging to the territory, or to the United States, then in  possession of the militia, be delivered to Colonel Johns, without delay. Through  misrepresentation, the government had sent troops to Utah to act as “a moral  force” in protecting Gentiles and apostates. The action of the governor  practically destroyed the militia, and by aid of the government troops, he  endeavored to establish a military power to intimidate the Latter-day Saints,  and lessen the power of the “Mormon” leaders.

 

Request of General Wells

 

Against this high-handed outrage, General Wells wrote, requesting the governor  to suspend his order until the 20th of November to enable Adjutant General Hiram  B. Clawson to make a complete report according to law, of the condition of the  militia. Governor Shaffer answered General Wells, October 27, 1870, in an  insulting letter denying the request. General Wells answered this attack in an  open letter which was published in the Deseret News.

 

The Provo Riot

 

The governor’s attitude in disregarding all local civil law and authority, bore  bitter fruit. The peace officers were rendered helpless in the performance of  their duties, and the rabid part of the community manifested a spirit of  contempt and defiance for the law. The city ordinances were broken with  impunity, and the violators were protected by the governor and judges. The  spirit prevailed among a certain class that the “Mormons” had ruled in Utah long  enough and it was stated that the authorities at Washington were to make a  change. There was to be a revolution and the minority was to assume the reins of  government.

 

One week after the governor’s proclamation disarming the militia, a mob of about  forty United States soldiers, who were stationed at Fort Rawlins, near Provo,  made a raid on that town. Late at night. September 22, they went to the home of  Alderman William Miller, fired several shots into the building, smashed in the  doors and windows, and took Miller a prisoner. Similar rioting occurred at the  homes of Alderman Elijah F. Sheets and Counselor A. F. McDonald. The home of the  latter was ransacked and his substance scattered in the yard and street. The  doors and windows of the co-operative store, and those of the meetinghouse,  were broken, and the rioters attempted to burn the latter building. Armed with  needle guns they captured a number of citizens and paraded them through the  streets prodding them with their bayonets. The reason for this deed was that the  citizens of Provo had refused to sell liquor to the troops.

 

Governor Shaffer’s Letter to General De Trobriand

 

Several days after the riot occurred Governor Shaffer wrote to General De  Trobriand, commander at Camp Douglas, censuring him for the outrage and trying  to place upon his shoulders the responsibility for the raid, for which he was in  no wise responsible. His command and that at Fort Rawlins, were separate and  distinct units. The general answered the governor’s letter which was evidently  written for political effect and to injure the commander because he had shown  some kindness to the “Mormon” people with some sharpness, showing that the  governor and not the general had been derelict of duty. If the governor expected  to profit by his communication, which was evidently the case for he gave it to  the press before the general received it, very little benefit was derived from  it.

 

The Rioters Punished

 

The commander at Fort Rawlins, Major Osborne, as well as General De Trobriand,  greatly regretted the unfortunate and unprovoked attack made by the soldiers.  The matter was taken up in a proper way by the military department of the  Platte, and the guilty parties were duly punished.

 

Death of Governor Shaffer

 

Monday, October 31, 1870, Governor J. Wilson Shaffer died in Salt Lake City. He  came to Utah in March and had served as governor about seven months, but during  that time had shown extreme bitterness against the majority of the people in all  his official acts. The day of his death a dispatch came from Washington  appointing Vernon H. Vaughan, the territorial secretary, to succeed him, who in  turn was succeeded by George A. Black, as secretary. Mr. Black had been Governor  Shaffer’s private secretary.

 

“The Wooden Gun Rebellion”

 

In November, 1870, at the regular time for the military musters, which had been  prohibited by Governor Shaffer, about one hundred men assembled on the Twentieth  Ward Square, many of them carrying wooden guns. Governor Vaughan was absent at  the time and Secretary Black was acting governor. He had eight of the men, viz:  Andrew Burt, Charles R. Savage, William G. Phillips, James Fennemore, Charles  Livingston, George M. Ottinger, Archibald Livingston and John C. Graham,  arrested. They were taken before Judge Hawley who bound them over to await the  action of the grand jury on the ground that it appeared that probably they had  committed a crime in disregarding Governor Shaffer’s order. They were placed  under heavy bonds, and as they refused to give bail, were given over to the  military authorities at Camp Douglas. They were kindly treated by the officers  and both “Mormon” and non-“Mormon” merchants looked after their wants,  furnishing them with many delicacies while they remained prisoners. The grand  jury, when it met, refused to indict them, and they were released. This incident  became popularly known as “The Wooden Gun Rebellion.”

 

The Return of Martin Harris

 

August 30, 1870, Martin Harris, one of the three witnesses to the Book of  Mormon, arrived in Salt Lake City. He had been absent from the Church since the  days of Kirtland; but had never during all those years denied his testimony. He  now came back humbly to the Church, and was baptized by Elder Edward Stevenson  and confirmed by Elder Orson Pratt. He died at Clarkston, Cache County, July 10,  1875, when nearly ninety-three years of age. A few hours before his death he  discoursed on the Book of Mormon and reiterated the truth of the visit of the  angel and bore testimony to the divine origin of the Book of Mormon.

 

The Pratt-Newman Discussion

 

During the consideration of the Cullom Bill by Congress, Rev. John P. Newman,  pastor of the Metropolitan Methodist Church in Washington, and chaplain of the  senate, delivered a number of lectures trying to prove that “God’s law condemns  the union in marriage of more than two persons.” His lectures were published in  the New York Herald, and replies were made to them by Elder Orson Pratt. It was  suggested by Edward L. Sloan, acting editor of the Salt Lake Daily Telegraph, a  paper owned by “Gentile” interests, that the reverend gentleman was wasting his  ammunition by preaching against plural marriage in Washington. It would be  better for him to come to Utah where the question was a live issue, and discuss  the issue with Orson Pratt, or some other “Mormon” elder. Mr. Newman, construing  this as a challenge from President Brigham Young, came to Utah in the summer of  1870, armed cap-a-pie and with banners flying. He immediately informed President  Young that he was here to accept his challenge to discuss the plural marriage  question. President Young advised him that he had issued no such challenge.  After the exchange of a number of spirited letters the reverend doctor issued a  challenge to President Young to discuss the question, “Does the Bible Sanction  Polygamy?”

 

It was evidently notoriety and worldly applause Mr. Newman was seeking, and he  was quite surprised and disappointed when President Young, in accepting the  challenge, appointed Orson Pratt or John Taylor, whichever Mr. Newman might  prefer, to take his place in the discussion. He came to meet the chief and not a  subordinate. Nevertheless, after some parleying the debate was held. Elder Orson  Pratt taking the affirmative of the question. The discussion began August 12,  1870, at 2 p.m. and continued during the two following days. Moderators were  chosen, but the merits of the discussion were left to the public to decide. The  press of the country took up the discussion, after the debate was over, and the  consensus of opinion throughout the land was that Elder Pratt had proved too  skilful for Dr. Newman.

 

Comments of the Press

 

The Washington correspondent of the New York Sun stated that the reverend doctor  was “out of his depth” in the discussion, and that it was “plain that the  apostle carried too many guns for the chaplain of the Senate.” The Boston   Banner of Light declared that “The Dr. Newman, who went forth from Washington  to Salt Lake City to take Mormonism by storm by flourishing his Orthodox Bible  in its face, has had to come away after a pretty severe tilt with one of the  leading elders, leaving his Bible behind him. Elder Pratt took his Bible out of  his hands and opened it again and again to pages that taught and upheld the  polygamy doctrine, reading off whole volleys of historical texts that went to  establish the leading Bible characters, esteemed Saints by Orthodoxy, as regular  Mormons. Dr. Newman crawfished amazingly on this part of the argument and was at  last rather glad to abandon it to his Mormon opponent.” Other papers declared  that force alone could settle the “Mormon Question.”

 

Usurpation of Authority

 

What the anti-“Mormon” political “ring” failed to accomplish by congressional  enactment, they assumed to obtain through the actions of the governor and the  judges. Judge McKean and his colleagues ignored the territorial laws enacted in  1852, which were still on the statutes, and denied to the probate courts all  jurisdiction except in matters of probate. Likewise the duties of the  territorial marshal and the territorial attorney general had been taken from  them and placed in the hands of the United States marshal and the United States  attorney. This, however, was done before the coming of McKean, but he and his  associates confirmed that action. The result of these illegal proceedings was  packed juries, absurd and contradictory rulings, the law becoming a mockery and  justice a travesty.

 

The Englebrecht Case

 

August 27, 1870, three days before the arrival of Chief Justice McKean, an  incident occurred in Salt Lake City which was ultimately to have much to do with  the overthrow of his tyrannical and fanatical power. This was the legal  abatement by the police of a liquor establishment conducted by Paul Englebrecht,  Christian Rehemke and Frederick Lutz. These men had been repeatedly fined for  infraction of the law; but on each occasion had appealed their case on the  ground that the city had no jurisdiction in the case. Expecting protection from  the district courts, which they had ample reason to believe would be given, the  firm continued to do an illegal liquor business without a city license. On the  date mentioned, the police emptied all the liquor into the ditch and destroyed  all the vessels that were used in its sale.

 

For this action suit was brought against the officers on complaint of Mr.  Englebrecht, and they were placed under bonds to await the action of the grand  jury on a criminal charge.

 

An Illegal Jury

 

Judge Strickland ordered the grand jurors for that term of court selected by the  United States marshal upon a writ of open venire, when the law provided that the  county clerk in the presence of other officials should select them by lot. The  attorneys for the city officers challenged the proceedings and filed a motion to  that effect. Judge Strickland ruled that the third district court was a United  States court and subject to the acts of Congress, and not the laws of the  territory, the challenge was overruled and the jurors accepted. The accused men  were indicted and then convicted for “a wilful and malicious destruction of  property,” and were ordered to pay damages in the sum of $59,063.25, which was  three times the price of the property destroyed. The supreme court of Utah  affirmed the decision and an appeal was taken to the supreme court of the United  States. Of this action we will speak later.

 

Indictment Against President Young

 

When these perverters of the law had things arranged to their liking they  prepared to conduct a crusade against the Church. President Young was indicted  by this hand-picked grand jury for “lewd and lascivious cohabitation.” He was  later admitted to bail by Judge McKean in the sum of five thousand dollars.

 

“A System on Trial”

 

Arguments were made before the court to quash the indictment, which consumed  several days, but Judge McKean rendered a decision in which he said:

 

 “Let the counsel on both sides, and the court also keep constantly in mind the  uncommon character of this case. The supreme court of California has well said,  ‘Courts are bound to take notice of the political and social conditions of the  country they judicially rule.’ It is therefore proper to say, that while the  case at bar is called ‘the People versus Brigham Young,’ its other and real  title is ‘Federal Authority versus Polygamic Theocracy.’ The government of the  United States, founded upon a written Constitution, finds within its  jurisdiction another government claiming to come from God imperium in  imperio whose policy and practices are, in grave particulars, at variance with  its own. The one government arrests the other, in the person of its chief, and  arraigns it at this bar. A system is on trial in the person of Brigham Young.  Let all concerned keep this fact steadily in view; and let that government rule  without a rival which shall prove to be in the right.”

 

The motion being overruled the defendant pleaded not guilty, and further  proceedings were postponed for future action. Among the attorneys defending  President Young were Thomas Fitch and Charles H. Hempstead, non-“Mormons.” The  latter was formerly captain of the California volunteers and editor of the  Vedette, the first anti-“Mormon” paper in Utah. He resigned the office of United  States district attorney because of the wicked and malicious methods in which  the federal courts in Utah were conducted, and became legal counsel for  President Young.

 

Throughout the entire country the attitude and remarks of Judge McKean were  severely criticized for attempting to prosecute the Church in the case of  Brigham Young and punish him for the alleged “evils of a system.”

 

Unexpected Calling of the Case

 

Having been given to understand that his case would not be called until the  spring term of court, President Young, who was in ill-health, went to St. George  to spend the winter. His leading attorney, Thomas Fitch, also departed for the  East. No sooner had Judge McKean learned of the departure of President Young  than he set the date for the trial for the 20th of November. Attorney Hempstead  protested, and asked for further time on the ground that it was not understood  that the case would be called. Mr. Baskin, the prosecutor, demanded a forfeiture  of the bond because the defendant was not present, but Judge McKean granted a  stay until December 4, and later to the 9th of January, 1872. It was published  by the Associated Press that Brigham Young had forfeited his bond and had fled  from justice, and every lie imaginable to his injury was presented to the people  of the United States. Although he was sick and it was bitter winter weather,  President Young, over the protest of his brethren, returned to Salt Lake City,  to face trial before the unfriendly court. In the meantime, however, Mr. Baskin  who had been improperly appointed district attorney, was replaced by George C.  Bates.

 

Other Accusations

 

On the statement of William A. Hickman, a self-confessed murderer, who had been  excommunicated from the Church for his crimes, charges were made against Brigham  Young, Daniel H. Wells and others, as accessories to Hickman’s crimes. President  Young knew that he would also face this charge when he returned to Salt Lake  City. Nevertheless he returned, and on the 2nd day of January, appeared in court  to the astonishment of his enemies and asked to be admitted to bail. District  Attorney Bates was willing that bail should be given if it should be fixed at  the unreasonable sum of five hundred thousand dollars, but Judge McKean refused  on any terms to release the defendant. However, out of consideration for the  condition of his health he permitted him to be a prisoner in his own house  guarded by deputy marshals. Daniel H. Wells, who was mayor of Salt Lake City,  had previously been admitted to bail in the sum of fifty thousand dollars. This  was looked upon as an act of Providence  almost a miracle. A quarrel arising  between the judge and the district attorney, both went to Washington and the  trial of the accused brethren was postponed.

 

The Englebrecht Decision

 

The case never came to trial, for from the supreme court of the United States  there came a decision which overturned the rulings of the tyrannical judges. It  was the decision in the Englebrecht liquor case. The dispatch announcing it,  which came over the wire April 15, 1872, was as follows: “Jury unlawfully drawn:  summons invalid; proceedings ordered dismissed. Decision unanimous. All  indictments quashed.” This decision put an end to these petty persecutions for  the time, and about one hundred and twenty individuals, many of whom had been  imprisoned many months, were released.

 

The Poland Law

 

In 1874, Congress passed a measure repealing certain Utah statutes relating to  the territorial marshal and attorney general, and vesting their duties in the  federal officers. The probate courts were also limited in their jurisdiction to  matters of estates, guardianship and divorce. This, in part, is what the  anti-“Mormon” element had been contending for in Utah. While this legislation  was much less radical than that previously proposed, yet it curtailed the civil  and political rights of the people, which had guaranteed their protection  against tyranny in the past.

 

The Case of Ann Eliza Webb Young

 

In July, 1873, a divorce suit was filed before Judge McKean, by Ann Eliza Webb  Young, against President Brigham Young. This woman, a plural wife, besides  asking for a decree of separation also sued for alimony pending the litigation,  and for permanent support for herself and two children by a former marriage. The  case dragged along until February, 1875, when Judge McKean ordered the defendant  to pay the plaintiff three thousand dollars attorney’s fees and five hundred  dollars a month for her support and the education of her children. President  Young was given ten days in which to pay the fees, and twenty days to pay the  alimony, which amounted for the nineteen months to nine thousand five hundred  dollars.

 

An appeal was taken to the supreme court of the territory, but before a decision  could be reached the time limit had expired, and the defendant was again dragged  before the remarkable tribunal of Judge McKean to show cause why he should not  be punished for contempt of court. He denied that he had any intention of  showing contempt and was merely seeking the benefit of an appeal. Judge McKean  held that he was guilty of contempt and sentenced him to twenty-four hours’  imprisonment in the penitentiary. He was accompanied to prison by a number of  friends and spent the night in comparative comfort in a room adjoining the  warden’s quarters.

 

Removal of Judge McKean

 

The news of this strange trial and the actions of Judge McKean spread throughout  the country. There was a great deal of unfavorable comment. The San Francisco  Bulletin said: “When Judge McKean assumes that this woman is the wife of Young,  makes an interlocutory degree granting her three thousand dollars to maintain a  suit for divorce, when there never was a legal marriage, and commits Young for  contempt because he hesitates long enough to raise the question of the legality  of the order, he burns some strange fire on the altar of justice.” A Chicago  paper stated: “This summary method of dealing with the Prophet looks very much  like persecution, and will awaken sympathy for him instead of aiding the cause  of justice.” Even the President of the United States, who had stood by Judge  McKean through all his dealings, when others protested and favored his removal,  was forced to take some action. Five days after he sent President Young to  prison, Judge McKean was removed from office for “several acts,” which the  dispatch stated, were deemed “ill advised and tyrannical, and in excess of his  powers as a judge.”

 

The Case of George Reynolds

 

In 1874, George Reynolds, the private secretary of President Brigham Young, and  a man of honor and integrity, was indicted for violation of the bigamy law of  1862. This was to be a test case. The “Mormon” people felt confident that the  law was unconstitutional as it restricted them in the exercise of their religion  and plural marriage had been commanded by the Lord. Elder Reynolds hearing of  his indictment voluntarily appeared in court, and gave himself up for trial. He  was convicted and sentenced to one year’s imprisonment and to pay a fine of five  hundred dollars. An appeal was taken to the supreme court of the territory, and  the case was dismissed on the ground that the grand jury which found the  indictment was an illegal jury.

 

The Second Reynolds Trial

 

A second trial was held in 1875, before Alexander White, chief justice of Utah.  Judge White manifested a determination to be severe, and when a verdict of  guilty was rendered, he sentenced Elder Reynolds to pay a fine of five hundred  dollars and serve a term of two years in the penitentiary at hard labor. The  supreme court of Utah confirmed the decree, and an appeal was taken to  Washington.

 

Death of President George A. Smith

 

September 1, 1875, President George A. Smith, first counselor to President  Brigham Young, died at his residence the Historian’s Office in Salt Lake City.  He was ordained to the apostleship at the temple lot in Far West, April 26,  1838, when in his twenty-second year. He passed through the trials and  vicissitudes of the Church from the days of Kirtland. He was Church historian  and recorder from 1854 until the time of his death. In the fall of 1872 he took  a mission to Europe and Asia, accompanied by Elder Lorenzo Snow and others, and  visited the various missions and Jerusalem, where he rededicated the land for  the return of the Jews. While absent he was sustained as trustee-in-trust for  the Church.

 

Dedication of the St. George Temple

 

The forty-seventh general conference of the Church was held in the St. George  Temple in April, 1877. President Young, his counselors, the apostles and many  leading brethren were present. The St. George Temple was dedicated on the 6th,  President Daniel H. Wells offering the dedicatory prayer. This was the first  temple to be erected in the Rocky Mountains, and the first which the Saints had  been privileged to build without molestation by enemies. Work for both the  living and the dead commenced in the building following the dedication and has  continued to be performed ever since.

 

Death of President Young

 

August 29, 1877, President Brigham Young, then in his seventy-seventh year,  passed away after a brief illness, at his home in Salt Lake City, surrounded by  his family. On the 19th, he organized the Box Elder Stake of Zion, at Brigham  City, which marked the close of his public ministry. The last words he uttered  were “Joseph, Joseph, Joseph!” He was thinking of perhaps conversing with the  Prophet Joseph Smith. September 2, the funeral services were held in the  tabernacle, and there were gathered there to pay their respects and to mourn,  the many thousands of modern Israel.

 

Brigham Young, the Prophet

 

Brigham Young, the great pioneer and colonizer but greater still the prophet of  the Lord was sincerely loved by the righteous and equally hated by the wicked.  His life was one of trials and tribulations. Few were the days he spent in  peace; many were the days he suffered and labored for the love of his  fellow-men. He died misunderstood, save by the little band of devoted Saints who  suffered with him and shared his hopes, his aspirations, and the assurance which  was his of eternal life in our Father’s Kingdom.

 

 Chapter 48 Church Colonization and Progress. 1847 through 1877

 

A Great People in the Mountains

 

By the time President Brigham Young’s administration came to a close, the  Latter-day Saints had become a great people in the Rocky Mountains. They were  destined still to grow in numbers, spread over greater territory, conquer more  deserts, and develop spiritually and temporally in keeping with the progress of  the times; but even then (1877) they had built up many settlements, spread over  a vast area, and accomplished a wonderful work in the reclamation of the arid  west.

 

The Planting of Colonies

 

Before the Saints had been in the Salt Lake Valley a year many parties were sent  out, principally to the north and to the south, to form new settlements. Within  two years from the time Salt Lake City was founded colonies had been planted in  the uttermost parts of the territory. Exploring parties were sent out in  advance, and when a site was selected a large company of volunteers followed to  make the permanent settlement. In these colonies care was taken to have a proper  representation of craftsmen, that the needs of the settlers might be supplied.  Skilled carpenters, masons, millwrights, blacksmiths, cobblers, as well as  tillers of the soil, went into these unbroken wastes and made them blossom by  their industry. Each individual was given a specific duty to perform, and did it  unselfishly, according to the plan which had been arranged. Ploughs, seeds and  the required animals for ploughing, ditch building and other labor, were  provided, and the labor was done on the co-operative plan. All shared alike,  according to their individual needs. They were happy, notwithstanding the  rigorous toil required to subdue the desert places.

 

Unparalleled Progress

 

It has been written of them, that they “made more progress and suffered less  privation in reclaiming the waste lands of the wilderness than did the Spaniards  in the garden spots of Mexico and Central America, or the English in the most  favored region near the Atlantic seaboard.” But let it be understood this was  not accomplished by them without severe trial and suffering.

 

Their Perfect Organization

 

The reason they were able to obtain such excellent results is that they had a  perfect organization, and were loyal and obedient to the authority over them.  This naturally resulted in complete co-operation and unity of purpose, with a  minimum of individual selfishness. They had not come to the Rocky Mountains for  the sake of worldly aggrandizement, but for the establishment of permanent  homes, and the exercise of their religious freedom in peace according to the  dictates of their conscience.

 

Proselytes from Europe

 

Between the years 1847 and 1856, fifty-nine companies of emigrants, comprising  seventeen thousand souls, sailed from European shores, bound for Utah. Five  thousand others had previously emigrated, making a total of about twenty-two  thousand persons from abroad, who had joined the Church through the preaching of  the Gospel. They were principally from the British Isles, Scandinavia, Germany  and Switzerland, with a small sprinkling from France, Italy and other nations.  They came from the factories and the mines of Great Britain, the fisheries and  the dairy farms of Scandinavia, the workshops of Germany, the vineyards of  France and Italy from various pursuits and occupations in which many of them  were unable, in the old world, out of the scanty pittance they received as  wages, to save enough to buy a passage across the sea. Of the emigration from  the old country between 1850 and 1860, it was estimated that 28 per cent were  common laborers; 14 per cent, miners, and about 28 per cent mechanics. From the  ranks of the remaining thirty per cent there came many merchants, doctors,  professors, skilled engineers, artisans, and artists.

 

Character of the Converts

 

Occasionally there was one who had joined the Church who was in possession of an  abundance of this world’s goods, and big enough to share with his less fortunate  neighbor, for the converts were not confined to the poor and the needy, the  unlearned and the ignorant. In fact very few of the latter class received the  Gospel message. The converts were gathered from all nations, but they were not  the scum, the moral outcasts, the undesirables among the nations, but the very  bones and sinews, the life’s blood, the brawn, without which the nations would  perish from the earth. This class, despised and trodden under foot from time  immemorial by the haughty, the proud, the titled nobility; but upon whom,  nevertheless, the aristocratic population depend for their very existence, is  the salt of the earth that class which the scriptures say, in the day of the  Savior’s ministry, had the Gospel preached to them and heard it gladly.

 

The pioneer immigrants, who established the state of Utah, belonged to the great  industrial class, honest, though generally poor, which laid the foundation of  our nation. Among the early members of the Church were many who fought in  freedom’s cause and who were descendants of the early colonial families of New  England and the border Atlantic States.

 

What the Gospel Did for Them

 

“Mormonism” took hold of the dependent thousands of poor from all parts of the  earth and made them virtually independent by placing them on farms, and  otherwise furnishing them with remunerative employment, by which they became  financially free. The year that President Young died, the population of Utah  Territory was approximately one hundred and forty thousand, and of that number  over forty thousand were of foreign birth. Men from the looms of England, the  factories of Germany, and various other dependent vocations, in the towns and  cities of Europe, were under the necessity of changing the nature of their  lives. These men, unaccustomed to the severity of the labor required in farming  were sent out to reclaim the desert wastes, and to till the soil in an  uninviting land; yet they were successful, and were transformed into prosperous  farmers, stockraisers, blacksmiths, husbandmen, and were made free landholders   a thing they never dreamed of becoming while residing in the crowded centers of  Europe.

 

The Amalgamation of Many Peoples

 

Notwithstanding they were gathered from the four quarters of the earth, with all  their different customs and habits of life, their new surroundings, coupled with  their unity of religious views, soon welded them together into one race and  people. The Gospel as revealed through Joseph Smith teaches unity. Those who  embrace it, whatever their views may have been before, soon learn to think  alike; their aims are the same, their desires mutual, and all are brought to a  common understanding. Such are the effects of the Gospel upon them that they  forget their nationality and are absorbed by their new environment, and truly  become a part of the soil on which they dwell.

 

Benefits from the Amalgamation

 

As England was made great through the mingling of Norman, Saxon and Dane with  the native tribes of Britain, so also have the “Mormon” people benefited through  the amalgamation of the races. Through the preaching of the Gospel “Mormonism”  has drawn on the best nations; has sifted and gathered from them their very best  people, and due to the peculiar circumstances that prevail, the unity of faith  and aspiration the Gospel inspires, it is moulding out a new and superior race.  The “Mormon” people are strong mentally, spiritually, morally, as well as  physically. Battling with the elements and contending with many difficulties  have made them such. They came to the valleys of the mountains “with songs of  everlasting joy” to obtain inheritances for themselves and children after them  that shall endure forever, in a land of liberty, known to them as being “choice  above all other lands.”

 

Frugality and Co-operation

 

The early settlers were taught to produce as far as possible, all that they  consumed; to be frugal and not wasteful of their substance; to draw from the  elements the necessities of life and avoid all vitiated tastes which would lead  them into excessive indulgence. Home industry was the watchword, and the people  of necessity were called upon to be producers. Their clothing, though plain, was  durable and the workmanship of their own hands. In the days of the pioneer, and  until comparatively recent times, the spinning wheel and the loom were to be  seen in the homes of the Saints.

 

Co-operation and community interests did much for the people in those early  days. Houses were built, canals were dug, fields were ploughed and planted, and  reservoirs were constructed on the co-operative principle for the welfare of the  people. There was no money to be had, and such was the concern of the individual  for the progress of the community that his time was given gratis in the making  of public and civic improvements. He realized that he was bound to reap his  portion of the benefits derived from his toil.1

 

Changed Conditions of Today

 

Today it is largely the case, that a man who gives his time, even though it be  in some labor from which he is bound to receive his portion of the reward, feels  that he must receive some monetary remuneration for the time he spends. And  thus, due to the modern labor conditions and the closer contact with the outside  world, with all its customs, theories and established institutions, this  excellent and neighborly custom of co-operation, which existed in the days of  President Brigham Young, has almost entirely passed away.

 

Division of Lands and Water

 

President Young taught the doctrine that a man should have as much farm land as  he could properly cultivate, and not more. The lands were divided among the  people on that principle. From the beginning it was also established that the  water from the mountain streams should belong to the people and not to private  individuals. This doctrine proved extremely beneficial. Where private  individuals have been permitted to file on the canyon streams, it has been a  detriment to the majority of the people who are dependent upon such streams.

 

A Farsighted Policy

 

The farsighted policy of President Young was the means of placing the people in  their own homes where they could dwell “safely, every man under his vine and  under his fig tree.” As late as the year 1896, the year Utah was admitted into  the Union, there were 19,816 farms and of that number 17,584 were free from  encumbrance of mortgage and debt. Unfortunately, since the advent of the  automobile and other modern conveniences and amusements, such a condition does  not exist today.

 

The Recreation of the People

 

Although the Latter-day Saints were forced to labor diligently and there was no  place for idlers among them, they found time for proper recreation. President  Young realized the necessity of recreation and amusement and knew their proper  place. The Sabbath day was sacredly observed. There was no conflict between duty  and pleasure and the labors of the people were faithfully performed. He  encouraged the drama and other educational diversions in which the routine of  the daily lives of the people was broken. He built the Salt Lake Theatre, which  was begun in 1861 and opened to the public in March 1862. Before that time the  Social Hall, which was built in 1852, was used for such entertainment. There  was much local talent among the people, which was augmented by visits to the  territory of the great artists of those times. The dance  not, however, as it is  conducted in these modern days was likewise encouraged. All amusements were  opened and closed with prayer; and the presence of the great Pioneer and his  associates at these entertainments, not only lent encouragement to the  recreation, but was an influence which established proper decorum and conduct.  Their amusements were all innocent and uplifting. The main thought of President  Young was to couple education with the recreation of the people, and have all  entertainments controlled by the influence of the Spirit of the Lord.

 

Importance of Education Realized

 

The education of the youth of the Church was a matter which received constant  attention, nor was there anything that was considered of greater importance. The  Prophet Joseph Smith taught that “the glory of God is intelligence,” and from  the organization of the Church, schools have been conducted for the members who  were instructed to obtain “out of the best books words of wisdom” by study and  by faith.

 

In February 1850, the legislature of the provisional government chartered the  University of Deseret (now the University of Utah) somewhat on the lines of the  charter of the University of Nauvoo. It was provided that $5000.00 be  appropriated annually by the legislature for the support of the University. This  was a very large sum for that day, to be provided by the handful of people for  the support of such an institution. It was also provided that primary, or  district schools should be supported. While this action was taken by officers of  the provisional government, and later ratified by them as officers of Utah  Territory, yet they were all members of the Church, with President Young taking  the initiative in the educational movement.

 

In the spring of 1851, district school houses were built in most of the wards of  Salt Lake City. These buildings were used for the general ward gatherings of the  Saints, and daily schools were held in them.

 

The Beginning of Church Schools

 

In later years, after the territory had increased in population, other schools  were established. President Young founded a number of Church schools. Among  these were the Brigham Young Academy (now the Brigham Young University) at  Provo, one of the leading institutions of learning in the state; the Brigham  Young College at Logan, and the Latter-day Saints University (now High School)  at Salt Lake City.2 In addition to these schools the auxiliary organizations3  also were organized for the training and education of the members of the Church  and have aided materially in this direction.

 

Territorial Expansion

 

At the close of the first decade after the settlement of Utah, colonies of the  Latter-day Saints extended from Fort Limhi on the north, to Cedar City, on the  south, a distance of about five hundred miles; and from Fort Supply on the east  to Carson Valley on the west, about four hundred miles. The population of this  area was about fifty thousand people, nearly all members of the Church.

 

Fort Limhi

 

In the summer of 1855, a colony was sent to the north where they founded Fort  Limhi (now called Lemhi) on Salmon River. This was the most northerly settlement  of the Saints, about three hundred and seventy-five miles from Salt Lake City.  The settlement was continued until 1858 when it was abandoned for the reason  that it was too far away and the colonists were constantly harassed by hostile  Indian tribes.

 

On the Rio Virgin

 

In 1861, a large number of Saints were called to go from the middle and central  counties of Utah to settle on the Rio Virgin and Santa Clara Rivers. They  located and founded the city of St. George, and other towns on the upper Rio  Virgin. The following year other members of the Church were called to go to that  southern country to lend strength to the settlements. That year they raised  about one hundred thousand pounds of cotton in the “Dixie” of the West, showing  that this industry was a possibility.

 

San Bernardino

 

At a much earlier date (1851), Elders Amasa M. Lyman and Charles C. Rich, with  about five hundred souls from Utah, journeyed to southern California, where in  September of that year they built the town of San Bernardino. This continued to  be a flourishing settlement until 1858, when the people were called back to Utah  owing to the coming of Johnston’s Army, and was never again occupied as a  permanent settlement by the Saints.

 

Bear Lake Valley

 

In the fall of 1863, Bear Lake Valley was settled by a colony under the  leadership of Elder Charles C. Rich, who made that country his home until his  death, November 17, 1883. Cache Valley had previously been occupied and  settlements founded as early as 1856.

 

The Muddy Mission

 

Early in the year 1871, the Saints who had gone to the far south and settled on  the Muddy River in 1865, abandoned their homes, due to oppressive taxation  levied against them by the new state of Nevada, which had been created out of  the western portion of the territory of Utah. Subsequently, however, these  settlements were re-established.

 

In this manner were the valleys of the mountains occupied by the Latter-day  Saints through the inspiration and wisdom of President Brigham Young. Many of  these settlements have grown into thriving and populous centers with a future  before them of still wider and greater expansion.

 

Organization of Stakes

 

At the time of the death of President Young in 1877, there were organized in the  Church twenty Stakes of Zion,4 namely, in the order of their creation: Salt  Lake, Weber, Utah, Parowan, Cache, Juab, Millard, Beaver, Bear Lake, Sevier, St.  George, Kanab, Panguitch, Davis, Tooele, Morgan, Sanpete, Summit, Wasatch and  Box Elder. Two others, St. Louis and Carson Valley, had been discontinued. The  wards in the Church on that date were approximately two hundred and fifty.

 

The Missions

 

During the administration of President Young, missionary labors were performed  in the various States of the Union, and in the following foreign lands: Canada,  British Isles, India, Australia, Palestine, Society Islands, France, Denmark,  Sweden, Norway, Hawaii, Italy, Switzerland, Iceland, Chile, Germany, Siam,  Gibraltar, South Africa, Malta, West Indies, New Zealand, Holland, Austria,  Finland and Mexico. In some of these fields little was accomplished; from others  there have been gathered to Zion many thousands of the scattered house of  Israel, and principally of the tribe of Ephraim, according to the predictions  of the ancient prophets. This has been especially true of the Anglo-Saxon,  Scandinavian and Teutonic races.

 

Notes

 

 1. We have a marvelous combination of physiographic conditions and social  organizations in the development of Utah under the guidance of Mormonism. The  agriculture pursued was irrigated agriculture, which for its success is  dependent upon a compact society, well knit together. Individualism was out of  the question under these conditions, and in Mormonism we find precisely the  cohesive strength of religion needed at that juncture to secure economic  success.

 

Agriculture was made the foundation of the economic life, and consciously so.  Brigham Young discouraged mining and adventurous pursuits, because he had a  theory of socio-economic development in accordance with which agriculture should  come first, manufacturing second, and mining later. It was essential that food  should be produced first of all, and also there was a desire that settled habits  should be acquired. Another peculiarity of the situation, namely, that the land  could be made to yield a harvest only by means of irrigation, has just been  mentioned, and the Mormons thus became the pioneers of modern irrigation in the  United States. (Dr. Richard R. Ely, in Harper’s Magazine, 1903)

 

2.  For the school year ending in June 1922, the Church appropriated the sum of  $750,000 for the maintenance of Church schools.

 

3.  For auxiliary organizations, see appendix .

 

4.  For list of stakes, see appendix.

 

 Part Six Recent Development

 

 Chapter 49 The Second Period of Apostolic Presidency. 1877 through 1879

 

The Apostles Again Preside

 

At the death of President Brigham Young, there was rejoicing among the enemies  of the Church, who thought it was due to his strong personality and force of  character that “Mormonism” endured. They did not, and could not, comprehend that  the Church had been restored for the last time, and was destined to endure  forever with the stamp of divine approval upon it, for the Power by which it was  upheld was higher and greater than the personality of any man. The Lord Jesus  Christ was its founder, and he had promised to protect and watch over it unto  the end.

 

The death of President Young again made the council of Twelve Apostles the  presiding quorum of the Church, and as such they were unanimously sustained at  the October conference in 1877, with President John Taylor at their head.  President John Taylor was born at Milnthorpe, Westmoreland, England, November 1,  1808. About the year 1828 he left his native land and came to Canada, where he  received the Gospel in 1836, through the preaching of Elder Parley P. Pratt. He  was called to the apostleship in December, 1838, and was actively engaged in the  ministry from that time forth. He filled numerous missions and opened the door  for the preaching of the Gospel in France in 1850. He superintended the  translation of the Book of Mormon in French and German, and was engaged in  literary work at home and abroad covering a period of many years. President  Taylor was a man of high integrity and strong conviction. He was painfully  wounded in Carthage jail four balls entered his body  at the time of the  martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch Hyrum Smith. Under his  administration the Church grew and expanded notwithstanding the fierce and cruel  persecution through which it was forced to go, when the government of the United  States, without mercy, was arrayed against it.

 

The Twelve Apostles continued to act as the Presidency of the Church until  October, 1880, a little more than three years, when the First Presidency again  was organized.

 

The Decision in the Reynolds Case

 

The case of Elder George Reynolds, which had been appealed to the supreme court  of the United States in 1875, was argued before that body in November 1878.  January 6, 1879, that court handed down a decision unanimously confirming the  sentence of the courts of Utah, and also declaring the anti-bigamy law of 1862  to be constitutional. This decision was of the utmost concern to the Latter-day  Saints, who were confident that the supreme court, in justice, could not give  confirmation to a law which they sincerely believed to be an infringement of  their religion.

 

President Taylor’s Comment

 

President John Taylor, convinced that this decision was an assault on the  exercise of religion guaranteed by the Constitution, stated in an interview and  in answer to questions from O. J. Hollister, United States internal revenue  collector in Utah, the following:

 

 “When the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted, those high  contracting parties did positively agree that they would not interfere with  religious affairs. Now, if our marital relations are not religious, what is?  This ordinance of marriage was a direct revelation to us through Joseph Smith,  the Prophet. You may not know it, but I know that this is a revelation from God  and a command to his people, and therefore it is my religion. I do not believe  that the Supreme Court of the United States has any right to interfere with my  religious views, and in doing it they are violating their most sacred  obligations. . . .

 

“We acknowledge our children; we acknowledge our wives; we have no mistresses.  We had no prostitution until it was introduced by monogamy, and I am now told  that these other diabolical deeds are following in its train. The courts have  protected these people in their wicked practices. We repudiate all such things,  and hence I consider that a system that will enable a man to carry out his  professions, and that will enable him to acknowledge his wife or wives and  acknowledge and provide for his children and wives, is much more honorable than  that principle which violates its marital relations and, whilst hypocritically  professing to be true to its pledges, recklessly violates the same and tramples  upon every principle of honor, which sits down and coolly and deliberately  decides how many children shall be murdered and how many shall live.”

 

An Unjust Sentence

 

The sentence including “hard labor” pronounced against Elder Reynolds was in  excess of the law. On that ground the attempt was made to have the case reopened  and the proceedings quashed, but the supreme court of the United States refused  to issue such an order. It did, however, remand the case to the supreme court of  Utah, with instructions “to cause the sentence of the district court to be set  aside, and a new one entered on the verdict in all respects like that before  imposed, except so far as it requires the imprisonment to be at hard labor.” A  petition from over thirty thousand citizens of the territory, asking for the  pardon of the defendant was forwarded to President Rutherford B. Hayes, who  ignored it.

 

The Defendant Imprisoned

 

The defendant, George Reynolds, was re-sentenced June 14, 1879, and two days  later he left Salt Lake City, for Lincoln, Nebraska, in charge of George A.  Black and William T. Shaughnessy, deputy marshals, to serve his sentence in the  Nebraska penitentiary. He served less than a month in that prison when he was  brought back to Utah and placed in the local penitentiary where he was confined  until he had served out his sentence, from June 1879 to January 1881, receiving  the remission of his fine and the reduction for good behavior of one hundred and  forty-four days. While confined he taught school, his pupils being the inmates  of the prison. So successful was he that the warden remarked of him: “Reynolds  is worth more than all the guards in keeping order among the prisoners.”

 

Bitter Threats Against the Church

 

The bitterness of the anti-“Mormon” press of Salt Lake City, and the broadcast  circulation of falsehoods by the enemies of the Church commenced an agitation  throughout the nation that was to result in special legislation against the  “Mormon” people intended to encompass their destruction. Ministers of the  Protestant churches in the United States took up the hue and cry. Many bitter  expressions were heard in condemnation of the Latter-day Saints, and threats  were made against their peace and safety. A sample of the bloodthirsty  utterances is that given by Rev. T. DeWitt Talmage in the Brooklyn Tabernacle,  shortly after the death of President Young, as follows: “Now my friends now, at  the death of the Mormon Chieftain, is the time for the United States government  to strike. They are less organized than they have been, and less than they will  be. If these Mormons will not submit to authority, let so much of their rich  lands be confiscated for the wants of the government as will be sufficient for  their subjugation. If the government of the United States cannot stand the  expense, let Salt Lake City pay for it. (Applause.) Turn their vast temple into  an arsenal. Set Phil Sheridan after them. (Immense applause.) Give them enough  troops and he will teach all Utah that forty wives is thirty-nine too many. I  call upon the Church of Jesus Christ to pray for the overthrow of this  iniquity.”

 

Address of Anti-“Mormon” Women

 

In November, 1878, the Gentile women in Salt Lake City met in the Congregational  Church, to the number of about two hundred, and drew up an address to the wife  of the President of the United States, denouncing plural marriage and its  practice in the name of religion. They called upon the “Christian women of the  United States” to aid them in the arrest of “the progress of evil,” and to delay  the admission of Utah into statehood until this was accomplished. Congress was  also memorialized and circular letters were forwarded to the clergy with the  request that they be presented to their congregations for signatures and then  sent to the congressmen of their respective districts.

 

“Mormon” Women Reply

 

A counter mass meeting of the women of the Church was held November 16, 1878, in  which they declared they had been misjudged and misrepresented to the nation in  regard to their most sacred rights. They invited the government to make an  impartial investigation of their cause.

 

Falsehoods of the Press

 

Nearly every paper in the United States devoted space to the “Mormon” question,  and almost without exception, with bitter denunciation and suggestions to  Congress of the most drastic nature. The Salt Lake Tribune did not hesitate to  circulate the most contemptible falsehoods that these fires of hate might be  kept burning.

 

The Miles Case

 

Another cause of agitation, and one that went a long way towards congressional  action of the severest nature against the practice of plural marriage, was the  case of John H. Miles. This case ran a course of about three years, having been  carried before the supreme court of the United States. Miles was arrested in  October, 1878, on complaint of Carrie Owen Miles, his wife. She accused Miles of  having married Emily Spencer of St. George, on the same day, and a little before  her own ceremony was performed. She was not present at the ceremony, but  testified that during a reception held that evening Emily Spencer was referred  to as Mrs. Miles. The case was taken before Judge Emerson, in the Third district  court, in April, 1879, where it was conceded that the ceremony had been  performed between John H. Miles and Carrie Owen, and the defense objected to the  testimony of the complainant on the ground that a wife could not testify  against her husband. The marriage of Miss Spencer was not admitted. However,  the evidence was taken and Miles was “found guilty” and sentenced to pay a fine  of one hundred dollars and serve a term of five years in the penitentiary. An  appeal was taken to the supreme court of Utah which affirmed the decision, and  the case was then taken to the supreme court of the United States. The end of  the matter came in 1881, when the supreme court handed down a decision stating  that an error had been committed in the trial court by permitting Caroline Owen  Miles to give evidence against Miles, since the law in Utah provided that a wife  could not legally testify against her husband, or a husband against his wife.  The marriage with Emily Spencer not having been admitted, and not having been  proved, was the only issue in the trial. The decision was set aside and the case  remanded for a new trial. The case was dropped, as the United States attorney  felt that there could be no conviction. However, this case helped to stir the  country to such a pitch that legislation was enacted repealing the Utah law.

 

Daniel H. Wells Before the Court

 

While the trial of John H. Miles was before the court, Caroline Owen Miles gave  a purported description of the apparel worn by those who passed through the  endowment house.1 The prosecution attempted to show that such apparel was worn  by those who went there to be married. Daniel H. Wells, who had performed the  ceremony for Miles and Carrie Owen, was called to the stand and questioned by  Attorney Van Zile, who asked him to describe the dress worn in that building.  This he declined to do. Judge Emerson decided that the question was proper, and  as the witness still refused, he was placed in the custody of the marshal, with  instructions that he should appear in the court the next day, to show cause why  he should not be committed for contempt of court.

 

Imprisonment of Daniel H. Wells

 

The next day, May 3, 1879, President Wells, with his attorney, appeared before  Judge Emerson and stated his willingness to answer the questions, if they should  be put in a proper way. The questions were put to him again, but purposely in  such a way that he felt it his duty not to answer them. He declared that he was  under sacred obligation to preserve secret what he was asked to reveal. The  court insisted that he should answer, and the witness replied: “I consider a  person who reveals the sacred ceremonies of the endowment house a falsifier and  a perjurer; and it has been and is a principle of my life never to betray a  friend, my religion, my country, or my God. It seems to me that this is  sufficient reason why I should not be held in contempt.”

 

The judge held that the witness was in contempt for not answering, and sentenced  him to pay a fine of one hundred dollars and to be imprisoned for two days.  President Wells was immediately placed in the hands of the United States marshal  and taken to the penitentiary where he served his brief term of confinement.

 

A Public Protestation

 

The action of Judge Emerson caused great indignation, and the Latter-day Saints  were aroused. A public demonstration in protest of the action was planned, and  many people gathered from the surrounding counties as far north as Bear Lake and  south as far as Juab. A procession of ten thousand formed and met President  Wells at the Burton Farm, three miles south of the city, and marched through the  streets to the tabernacle, which was thronged with people. The presence of the  released prisoner was a signal for prolonged applause. Speeches were made,  interspersed with music from several bands. As the procession marched through  the city they carried banners with inscriptions among which were the following:

 

 “If courts compel men to dishonor and forswear themselves, how can they expect  perjurers to give truth in evidence?”

 

“We honor the law and its just administration, but we despise petty tyranny.”

 

“We will teach our children to be true to their country and their God; but to  perjure themselves never! no never!”

 

“The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit; we are  answerable for them to our God.”  Thomas Jefferson.

 

“If ever the laws of God and men are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in  derogation of the latter.”  Blackstone.

 

“God’s Law: Thou shalt not forswear Thyself; but shall perform unto the Lord  thine oaths.”

 

“Modern Law: Thou shalt forswear thyself, or go to prison.”

 

“When Free Masons, Odd Fellows and others are compelled to make their secrets  public, it will be time enough to practice on Mormons; try the others first.”

 

“We venerate the Constitution, we honor the law, we respect the Executive,  Congress and the Judiciary; we bow to the righteous mandates of the law, but we  despise bigots, we execrate tyranny, and protest against intolerance from any  source.”

 

Litigation over President Young’s Estate

 

In June, 1879, a few of the heirs of President Brigham Young, in opposition to  all the rest, entered suit against the executors of the estate, claiming  property held in the name of the late president as trustee-in-trust for the  Church, as his personal property. The sum in litigation amounted to nearly one  million dollars. Application was made for an injunction restraining the  executors from further performance of their duties, and enjoining President John  Taylor from disposing of any property received by him as trustee-in-trust. Judge  Emerson granted the injunction and appointed William S. McCornick and United  States Marshal Shaughnessy, non-“Mormons,” to take charge of all the property.  President Taylor asked that the injunction be dissolved, and the order  appointing the receivers be revoked, on the ground that the claims against the  estate were “a bona fide existing indebtedness,” so recognized by the late  president, who authorized in his will the settling of such claims by his  executors.

 

Imprisonment of the Executors

 

A warrant was issued by Judge Boreman, who was most bitter against the Church,  for the arrest of President Taylor and the executors, George Q. Cannon, Brigham  Young, Jr., and Albert Carrington. Showing that he had complied with the order  of the court, President Taylor was discharged, but the executors were committed  to the penitentiary, for refusing to furnish additional security, which was  considered by them as nothing more or less than an attempt to levy blackmail.  Their imprisonment extended from August 4 to 28, when they were released through  the reversal of Judge Boreman’s decision by the supreme court of the territory   Judge Boreman dissenting.

 

Counter Suit and Settlement

 

A counter suit was brought against the heirs by the Church for the recovery of  its property, The case came before Judge John A. Hunter, who had arrived in the  territory the previous summer. The case was dismissed in October (1879), without  coming to judgment, as the parties to the suit came to a mutual agreement. The  litigant heirs, according to the agreement, were paid the sum of seventy-five  thousand dollars and all charges were withdrawn. The receivers were dismissed.  President Taylor presented the terms of the settlement before the general  conference of the Church which convened two days after the decision was made,  and it was endorsed by unanimous vote.

 

Secretary Evarts’ Circular Letter

 

William M. Evarts, secretary of state, in the cabinet of President Hayes, sent  out a circular letter in October 1879, to the diplomatic officers of the United  States in foreign countries, advising them that large numbers of persons from  various lands were coming to the United States for the purpose of joining the  “Mormons” in Utah; also that the marriage system of the “Mormons” was pronounced  by the laws of the United States to be a crime against the statutes of the  country. These immigrants, he said, came “to swell the numbers of the  law-defying Mormons of Utah,” who were endeavoring to bring persons to the  United States with the intent of violating laws punishable by fine and  penitentiary imprisonment. The representatives of the government abroad were  instructed to “check the organization of these criminal enterprises,” by calling  the attention of the several governments to the situation. This was to be in the  interest “not merely of a faithful execution of the laws of the United States,  but of the peace, good order and morality which are cultivated and sought to be  promoted by all civilized countries.”

 

Condemnation of Evarts’ Course

 

It was a time when condemnation of the “Mormons” was a popular amusement in the  world, but this letter of Secretary Evarts brought down on his head a storm of  ridicule, even from those unfriendly to the Latter-day Saints, in this country  and also in foreign lands. The London Times was very caustic in its treatment of  the letter, and the New York Sun stated: “Now let Mr. Evarts instruct his  diplomatic agents abroad to ask the foreign powers as a favor and a friendly act  towards the United States  to hang any of their subjects who may become  murderers after their arrival in this country. The foreign powers are said to  have been astonished by Mr. Evarts’ circular. They had reason to be amazed.”

 

The Murder of Joseph Standing

 

The continued publication of unfavorable articles in the press of the country  concerning the Latter-day Saints, and the constant repetition of falsehoods  emanating from the enemies of the Church at Salt Lake City where most all the  agitation originated caused much bitterness throughout the country. The  missionaries of the Church were sorely abused, especially in the Southern  States, where many of them were stripped, tied to trees and brutally beaten by  mobs, until the blood ran from their wounded bodies, and when released they were  ordered from that part of the country on pain of death if they remained.

 

On the 21st of July, 1878, Elders Joseph Standing, twenty-five years of age, and  Rudger Clawson, a youth of twenty-two, were surrounded by a mob at Varnal  Station, Whitefield County, Georgia, and were taken to the woods apparently for  the purpose of receiving a thrashing. Elder Standing at this juncture made some  show of resistance when one of the mobbers fired at him. The ball passed through  his left eye and ranging upward came out of the forehead. Immediately following  this deed one of the gang, pointing at Elder Clawson, said, “Shoot that man!” It  was a critical moment for the young elder, who turned and coolly faced the mob  with folded arms and exclaimed, “Shoot!” His coolness seemed to unnerve the mob  who lowered their guns. It was then suggested by one of the mobbers that Elder  Standing had shot himself, although he was unarmed. Elder Clawson at his earnest  solicitation was permitted to go after help, and while he was gone the fiends  shot about twenty bullets into the body of the prostrate man, mostly into his  face and neck, and so close that the wounds were powder burned.

 

The Coroner’s Verdict

 

An inquest was held and a verdict found in which David D. Nations, Jasper N.  Nations, A. S. Smith, David Smith, Benj. Clark, William Nations, Andrew Bradley,  James Fawcett, Hugh Blair, Joseph Nations, Jefferson Hunter and Mack McClure,  who were seen by witnesses in the mob at the time of the killing, were accused  of the crime.

 

“Not Guilty”

 

The guilty parties fled from Georgia. Three of them were captured and returned  to the state, but were released on furnishing bail in the sum of five thousand  dollars each. The grand jury found indictments against Jasper Nations for  murder, against Bradley for manslaughter, and against Blair for riot. In  October, 1879, their trial was held. Elder Clawson attended as a witness, and  notwithstanding the positive nature of his testimony, and that of the other eye  witnesses, all three defendants were acquitted. Elder John Morgan, who was  presiding in the Southern States and who was present at the proceedings, sent a  telegram to the Deseret News at the close of the trial of Jasper Nations,  stating: “The old, old story. Verdict, not guilty!”

 

Notes

 

1.  The Endowment House was a comparatively small temple, erected in the  northwest corner of the Temple Block to serve temporarily as a house of the  Lord. It was torn down in 1889 by the order of President Wilford Woodruff.

 

 Chapter 50 The Administration of President John Taylor. 1880 through 1887

 

The Year of Jubilee

 

April 6, 1880, was just fifty years from the day of the organization of the  Church. On this date and the three succeeding days, the fiftieth annual  conference of the Church was held in the tabernacle, Salt Lake City. Preliminary  meetings were also held on the 4th and 5th. All the members of the council of  the apostles were present, excepting George Q. Cannon, who was in Washington  representing Utah as delegate in Congress. President John Taylor drew attention  to the fact that this was the jubilee year of the Church, and referred to the  custom which prevailed in old Israel, as set forth in the twenty-fifth chapter  of Leviticus. It was proposed that it be made a year of jubilee and forgiveness  in the Church. The Church set the example by striking off one half the  indebtedness held by the Perpetual Emigration Fund Company, against individuals  classed as worthy poor, amounting to the sum of $802,000. One thousand cows and  five thousand sheep were also distributed among the needy. The Saints were  advised to be charitable and liberal in their dealing with one another. The sum  of $75,899, in unpaid tithing, one half the amount due, was remitted against the  Saints who were unable to meet their obligation. It was proposed that the Relief  Society lend to the farmers, who had suffered loss because of drouth the year  before, 34,761 bushels of wheat which they had on hand. This was to be repaid by  the farmers, without interest, at the close of the next harvest. “If you find  people owing you who are distressed, if you will go to work and try to relieve  them as much as you can, under the circumstances, God will relieve you when you  get into difficulties,” said President Taylor. “I will tell you that,” he added,  “in the name of the Lord. Let us act on a kind, generous, brotherly principle,  doing good one to another and carrying out the principles of the everlasting  Gospel in our lives.”

 

The Pioneer Day Celebration

 

The spirit of the jubilee was carried through the year, and was again made  manifest in a marked manner at the celebration on pioneer day, July 24, 1880.  There was a long pageant, which paraded through the streets of Salt Lake City,  and on three of the floats were natives from twenty-five countries, representing  the people who had been gathered through the preaching of the Gospel. A banner  was also carried upon which the inscription was written: “I will gather you out  from all nations.” Exercises were held in the tabernacle and patriotic speeches  were made. Utah had a population at that time of 143,690, showing an increase  of nearly 60,000 in the past decade. The great majority of these were members of  the Church.

 

President Taylor’s Prediction

 

At this celebration President Taylor gave utterance to the following prediction:  “There are events in the future, and not very far ahead, that will require all  our faith, all our energy, all our confidence, all our trust in God, to enable  us to withstand the influences that will be brought to bear against us. . . . We  cannot trust in our intelligence; we cannot trust in our wealth; we cannot trust  to any surrounding circumstances with which we are enveloped; we must trust  alone in the living God to guide us, to direct us, to lead us, to teach us and  to instruct us. And there never was a time when we needed to be more humble and  more prayerful; there never was a time when we needed more fidelity,  self-denial, and adherence to the principles of truth, than we do this day.”

 

Re-organization of the First Presidency

 

At the general semi-annual conference held in October, 1880, reports were made  of the distribution of the cattle, sheep and other substance, which was voted on  at the April conference. A time of great rejoicing was had and on the last day  (10th) the First Presidency was again re-organized with John Taylor as President  of the Church, and George Q. Cannon and Joseph F. Smith as his first and second  counselor, respectively. Elders Francis M. Lyman and John Henry Smith were  called to the apostleship, leaving one vacancy unfilled. The voting was done by  quorums, as it was at the sustaining of President Young, beginning with the  apostles; second, the patriarchs, presidents of stakes and counselors, and high  councils; third, the high priests; fourth, the seventies; fifth, the elders;  sixth, the bishops and their counselors; seventh, the lesser priesthood priests,  teachers, deacons; eighth, the presidents of various quorums, and last the whole  congregation.

 

Death of Orson Pratt. Calling of Elders Teasdale and Grant

 

Orson Pratt, the last surviving member of the original council of apostles, died  in Salt Lake City, October 3, 1881. Elder Pratt possessed a remarkable  analytical mind, and was one of the world’s great mathematicians. His discourses  and writings on the Gospel are clear and convincing. With all his learning he  was humble and unassuming, having perfect assurance in the divinity of the  mission of Joseph Smith.

 

In October, 1882, Elders George Teasdale and Heber J. Grant were called to the  apostleship by revelation given through President John Taylor. Elder Seymour B.  Young was also called to be one of the seven presidents of the seventies.1 This  revelation was given October 13, 1882, and the brethren were ordained three days  later. The Lord, in this revelation, called upon the various quorums of the  Priesthood to arise and purify themselves, and for the members to magnify their  callings. The Saints were commanded to set their houses in order that they might  be purged from sin. The prediction was made that eventually Zion should be  established and the nations shall yet acknowledge the Lord.

 

Dedication of the Logan Temple

 

The Logan Temple the second structure of the kind built in Utah was dedicated  May 17, 1884, under the direction of President John Taylor, who offered the  dedicatory prayer. The site for the temple was dedicated May 17, 1877, by Orson  Pratt. The work of excavation was begun May 28, and the laying of rock in July  following. September 19, 1877, the corner stones were laid, the order of  temple-building being followed. The dedicatory services in 1884, which lasted  three days, were very solemn and impressive, and the Saints rejoiced that  another house of the Lord had been built, where work for the salvation of the  living and the dead could be performed.

 

Anti-“Mormon” Legislation Agitated

 

During the eighties there appeared to be a united effort on the part of the  press and the denominational ministers to force legislation against the  Latter-day Saints. The chief instigators of this campaign were anti-“Mormon”  residents of Utah, with the aid of their organ, the Salt Lake Tribune. President  Rutherford B. Hayes, who was imposed upon by this agitation, in a message to  Congress in December, 1879, and again in 1880, referred to the “Mormon” question  and plural marriage. President Garfield made similar reference in his inaugural  address, and after the assassination of Garfield, President Arthur took the  matter up in his first message to Congress.

 

Bitterness of “Christian” Ministers

 

The bitterness of the times was expressed by the Chicago Interior, a  Presbyterian paper in the summer of 1881, as follows:

 

 “Let the lands and tenements of the Mormons be thrown open to original entry by  civilized settlers. . . . Let it be understood that the army will keep out of  the way in Utah for four years, and that the use and occupation of Mormon  property for one year is to give a preemption title. There are enough young men  in the West and South, who are seeking homes, to finish up the pest, fumigate  the Territory, and to establish themselves in ninety days after the word ‘go’ is  given.”

 

In consonance with this “Christian” spirit, the Rev. J.  H. Peters, at Dayton,  in October, 1881, said to his congregation: “I would that the guns of Fort  Douglas were turned upon them [the “Mormons”] and they made loyal by this means  if by no other.” Falsehoods of the deepest hue were also uttered. The notorious  T. De Witt Talmage, for instance, circulated the false report that the assassin  of President Garfield was a “Mormon,” and the Latter-day Saints were wickedly  accused by this reverend, and others, of holding meetings and rejoicing because  of the President’s death.

 

The Edmunds Bill

 

The result of all this agitation was the passing of a law in March, 1882, by  Congress, amending the law of 1862. It was known as the Edmunds Law, because it  was introduced into the senate by George F. Edmunds of Vermont. This measure not  only made punishable the contracting of plural marriage, but also polygamous  living, which was designated as “unlawful cohabitation.” The punishment for  contracting a plural marriage remained the same as in the law of 1862 a fine of  five hundred dollars or imprisonment for five years, or both, in the discretion  of the court.

 

The President of the United States was authorized to grant amnesty to those who  had entered into plural marriage before the passage of this bill, under certain  conditions and limitations, and their children born before January 1, 1883, were  legitimated.

 

“No polygamist, bigamist, or any person cohabiting with more than one woman, and  no woman cohabiting with any of the persons described as aforesaid . . . shall  be entitled to vote at any election . . . hold any office or place of public  trust, honor or emolument, in, under, or for any such Territory or place, or  under the United States,” was declared in this bill. Of course this was not  intended to apply to “Gentiles” who “cohabited” with more than one woman,  outside of the marriage relation, and such and Utah had them were shielded by  the officers of the law. Moreover, the mere belief in the doctrine of plural  marriage was sufficient to bar a person from jury service.

 

All registration and election offices were declared vacant, and provision was  made for a commission of five persons to be appointed by the President, and with  the consent of the senate, to attend to the duty of registration of voters,  canvassing the returns of elections for members of the territorial legislature,  and issue certificates, or other evidence of election, until otherwise provided  by law. They were to be paid three thousand dollars a year, and to continue in  office until the legislature, elected and qualified under the Edmunds Law,  should provide for filling the offices as authorized by the statute.

 

Self Government Denied

 

By this law, local self-government was annihilated in Utah, contrary to all the  guarantees granted to free people since the days of the framing of the  government of the United States, if not since the days of King John. Following  in the wake of this legislation there was conducted a crusade against the  “Mormon” people without a parallel in the history of the United States.

 

The Utah Commission

 

The five commissioners appointed through the Edmunds Law, arrived in Utah,  August 18, 1882. They were: Alexander Ramsy, of Minnesota, chairman; Algernon S.  Paddock, of Nebraska; George L. Godfrey, of Iowa; Ambrose B. Carlton, of  Indiana; and James R. Pettigrew, of Arkansas; with Arthur L. Thomas, secretary.  They immediately set to work on the duties assigned them, and appointed  registrars for the November election, in a manner most unjust to the “Mormon”  people. Eight of the registrars, out of twenty-four, were members of the Church,  yet the “Mormon” population was in excess of 120,000, and the “Gentile”  population  including apostates and others classed as “doubtful” was  approximately 23,000. The commissioners also published rules for the guidance  of the registrars and the government of election judges, which were manifestly  unfair and beyond the scope of the law, which was done to disfranchise a large  portion of the “Mormon” population.

 

The Test Oath

 

Perhaps the most abominable and shameful thing they did was to prepare the  following “test oath:”

 

 County of Territory of Utah, } ss.

 

I ……………, being first duly sworn (or affirmed), depose and say that I am over  twenty-one years of age, and have resided in the Territory of Utah for six  months, and in the precinct of ……………… one month immediately preceding the date  hereof, and (if a male) am a native born or naturalized (as the case may be)  citizen of the United States and a taxpayer in this Territory, or (if a female),  I am native born, or naturalized, or the wife, widow or daughter (as the case  may be) of a native born or naturalized citizen of the United States; and I do  further solemnly swear (or affirm) that I am not a bigamist or a polygamist;  that I am not a violator of the laws of the United States prohibiting bigamy or  polygamy; that I do not live or cohabit with more than one woman in the marriage  relation, nor does any relation exist between me and any woman which has been  entered into or continued in violation of the said laws of the United States  prohibiting bigamy or polygamy; and (if a woman) that I am not the wife of a  polygamist, nor have I entered into any relation with any man in violation of  the laws of the United States concerning polygamy or bigamy.

 

Subscribed and sworn before me this …….. day of …………, 1882.

 

……………………………….

 

Registration Officer …… Precinct.

 

Careful Wording of the Oath

 

The expression “I do not live or cohabit with more than one woman IN THE  MARRIAGE RELATION,” was so placed as were other clauses to apply against the  “Mormons” only. The “Mormon” press and preachers drew attention to this feature  of the oath which denied to the “Mormon polygamist,” but permitted the “Gentile  libertine,” the right to vote. The admission was commonly made that the Edmunds  Law was prepared solely against the “Mormons” and not to apply to the  immoralities of the “Gentiles.” This led the First Presidency in an address to  the Saints in August, 1882, to say that they regretted that men of high  positions would take that view of the law; but they perceived “with unmixed  satisfaction” the sharp distinction the oath drew between marriage and  licentiousness.

 

The Law made Retroactive

 

Another infamous ruling was that any person who had lived in the plural marriage  state, but was then not living in that relation, was denied the right of  franchise; and this was interpreted to apply to those who had thus married even  before the law of 1862. For instance, if a man had married two wives in 1850,  before any law against plural marriage was enacted, and both wives had died  before the law was passed; the commission ruled that he was a “polygamist”  notwithstanding he had no wife living, and denied him the right to vote. “Once a  polygamist always a polygamist,” was the common expression. Other rulings and  actions, contrary to the law, but intended to annoy and disfranchise the  members of the Church, that the minority might rule, were attempted, among them  denial to the women of their suffrage.

 

A Campaign of Persecution

 

From this time forth until the close of President John Taylor’s administration,  and beyond, the government of the United States carried on a campaign of  prosecution, that was relentless and even cruel, against all members of the  Church who had married plural wives. Men were punished, not for contracting  plural marriage since the passage of the law, but for “unlawful cohabitation;”  federal officers hunted men and women and dragged them before selected grand  juries, where they were shamefully insulted. Even small children did not escape,  but were forced to testify and answer improper and indecent questions, with the  object in view of obtaining evidence against their parents; and this was done  with threats of dire punishment and contempt of court, if they refused. Such  actions partook too much of the days of the Spanish inquisition. Paid spies   men of debased character were employed to gather evidence. Among those who sat  on juries to judge the “morals” of the “Mormon” people, were those who were  recreant to every law of decency. The petty officers and the judges of the  courts carried on a reign of terror in their determination to stamp out the  practice of plural marriage, and it appeared that the greatest crime in the  world was for a man to acknowledge honestly that he was the husband of more than  one wife, and that he diligently and faithfully supported them and their  children; while for the libertine and the harlot there was protection by  officers of the law.

 

President Taylor’s Statement

 

At the general conference of the Church in April, 1882, President John Taylor  spoke of the approaching storm. “While the excitement lasts,” said he, “it is  useless to reason with the world; when it subsides we can talk to them.” He also  expressed the views of the Latter-day Saints when he said: “We do not wish to  place ourselves in a state of antagonism, nor act defiantly, toward this  government. We will fulfil the letter, so far as practicable, of that unjust,  inhuman, oppressive, and unconstitutional law. . . . But we cannot sacrifice  every principle of human right. . . . While we are God-fearing and law-abiding,  and respect all honorable men and officers, we are no craven serfs, and have not  learned to lick the feet of oppressors, nor to bow in base submission to  unreasonable clamor. We will contend, inch by inch, legally and  constitutionally, for our rights as American citizens.” So sore became the  persecution that hundreds of homes were broken up and husbands and fathers were  sent to the penitentiary for the offense of “unlawful cohabitation.”

 

A Tribune Canard

 

To add to the evil of the times the circulation of false and malicious reports  increased, and the Latter-day Saints were portrayed as the vilest of the vile.  The result of this was continued persecution of the elders in the mission  fields.

 

One of these abusive and lying canards appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune, March  16, 1884. It purported to be the disloyal utterances of “Bishop West, of Juab.”  There was no Bishop West, and the falsehood was exposed. When the  Tribune was  caught red handed in its lying, it very reluctantly admitted the falsehood, but  added that the report sounded like what was going on all the time. Articles of  this kind were constantly appearing, and the members of the Church were  repeatedly insulted and abused with the hope that some overt act might be  committed through unendurable provocation, and thus occasion be made against the  Church for its destruction. However, the persecuted people bore the insults  without giving cause for such diabolical action.

 

The Canard the Cause of Murder

 

The “Bishop West” hoax might have been forgotten if the falsehood had ended with  the exposure of the Tribune  story, but, unfortunately, it was circulated in  Tennessee by a Reverend Vandevere, of Lewis County, who made it an occasion to  attack the Saints in the South, and arouse the populace against them. He had  been duly advised of the nature of the falsehood, but that made no difference;  he continued to repeat the story. The result of this circulation of the  Tribune’s falsehood, was the enacting of a tragedy, at Cane Creek, Lewis County,  Tennessee, of a most shocking character.

 

The Tennessee Massacre

 

It happened Sunday, August 10, 1884. That morning a number of elders and Saints  met at the home of James Condor for religious worship. While the small  congregation was assembling, a mob of masked ruffians invaded the premises and  shot and killed Elders John H. Gibbs, of Paradise, and William S. Berry, of  Kanarra, and also two young men, Martin Condor and John Riley Hudson, who were  not members of the Church, but who attempted to protect the elders. Young  Hudson, securing his gun, shot and killed the leader of the mob, one David  Hinson, but Hinson’s followers returned the fire, mortally wounding the young  man who died about one hour later. Because of this retaliation the mob returned  and poured a fire into the house through the windows, seriously wounding Mrs.  Condor, and riddling the body of Elder Berry. They then secured the body of  their leader and made off. Two other missionaries, Elders William H. Jones and  Henry Thompson, escaped.

 

Elder Roberts Secures the Bodies of the Slain

 

Elder B. H. Roberts was at Chattanooga, in charge of the mission in the absence  of President John Morgan, who was in Salt Lake City. At the peril of his own  life he went forth and secured the bodies of the missionaries and had them  forwarded to Utah, where the “Mormon” people were in mourning. The bodies of the  slain elders were interred at their home towns, but public funeral services were  also held in Salt Lake City, August 24, 1884.

 

Governor Murray to Governor Bate

 

Governor Eli H. Murray, of Utah, was so filled with animus against the  Latter-day Saints that it was impossible for him to communicate with Governor W.  B. Bate, of Tennessee, regarding the massacre, without abuse of the Latter-day  Saints. Governor Bate offered a reward for the detection and arrest of the  murderers. Evidently fearing that they might be caught and punished, Governor  Murray, without any reason or excuse, sent a dispatch to the governor of  Tennessee in which he said: “Lawlessness in Tennessee and Utah are alike  reprehensible, but the murdered Mormon agents in Tennessee were sent from here  as they have been for years by the representatives of organized crime, and I  submit that as long as Tennessee representatives in Congress are, to say the  least, indifferent to the punishment of offenders against the national law in  Utah, such cowardly outrages by their constituents as the killing of emigration  agents sent there from here will continue.”

 

The Trial of Rudger Clawson

 

Charles S. Zane became chief justice of Utah in 1884. He came to the territory,  August 23, of that year. He was a man whose moral life was above reproach, but  he was possessed of an intolerant spirit, and was determined to conduct a strict  enforcement of the Edmunds Law. The first case to be tried under that law came  before his court October 15, 1884. It was the case of Rudger Clawson, who was  found guilty, and when asked by the court if he had any legal cause to show why  judgment should not be pronounced he replied:

 

 “Your honor, I very much regret that the laws of my country should come in  conflict with the laws of God; but whenever they do, I shall invariably choose  the latter. If I did not so express myself, I should feel unworthy of the cause  I represent. The constitution of the United States expressly says that Congress  shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the  free exercise thereof. (It cannot be denied I think, that marriage, when  attended and sanctioned by religious rites and ceremonies, is an establishment  of religion.) The law of 1862 and the Edmunds Law were expressly designed to  operate against marriage as practiced and believed in by the Latter-day Saints.  They are therefore unconstitutional, and of course cannot command the respect  that a constitutional law would. That is all I have to say, your honor.”

 

The speech was characteristic of the man. It was bold, sincere, but not defiant.  It struck the judge with amazement and he determined on a heavy penalty. It was  the third day of November when Elder Clawson was before the court. He was  sentenced to pay a fine of eight hundred dollars and imprisonment for four  years. Elder Clawson remained in prison until December 12, 1887 three years, one  month and ten days  when he received a pardon from President Grover Cleveland.

 

The Segregation Ruling

 

Following this trial there was inaugurated a cruel and determined persecution.  Women were sent to prison for contempt because they would not testify against  their husbands. The courts ruled that indictments might be found against a man  guilty of cohabitation “for every day.” To be seen at the home of a plural wife,  or to support his plural family, was sufficient to create an offense against a  man. Each “distinct and separate violation of the law,” as interpreted by the  judges, was a separate offense and was liable for punishment.

 

This order of segregation, as it was called, drove many of the leading brethren  into exile, for it was virtually an announcement that the violation of the  Edmunds Law could be punished by life imprisonment. Later, however, while the  supreme court of the United States upheld the Edmunds Law, it condemned the  action of the judges in Utah in establishing the “segregation” policy. This came  in the habeas corpus case of Elder Lorenzo Snow in February, 1887. While,  however, this ruling was being enforced, the First Presidency were in retirement  and communicated with the Saints from time to time in general epistles.

 

Sincerity of the “Mormon” People

 

With all the severity practiced against the “Mormon” people under the Edmunds  Law, yet it did not satisfy the enemies of the Church. Without question many of  the law makers had imputed to the Latter-day Saints impure motives in the  practice of plural marriage. They now discovered through the prosecutions, which  fell into the category of persecutions, that it was a matter of the most sincere  and sacred character. Nevertheless they were determined to put an end to the  practice. Heavier penalties did not seem to avail, for the members of the  Church accepted plural marriage as a sacred religious rite, commanded by the  Lord, and they would rather die than break their covenants. The actions of the  government they looked upon as unconstitutional and an attack upon their  religious duties, and while they desired to be, and were, loyal to the country,  at the same time they desired to be loyal to their God.

 

The Edmunds-Tucker Law

 

In March, 1887, Congress passed a supplemental act known as the Edmunds-Tucker  Law. President Grover Cleveland neither approved nor disapproved of the act, so  it became a law without his signature. Among the many features of this measure  were the disincorporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,  and the dissolving of the Perpetual Emigration Fund Company, the property of  which was escheated to the government of the United States for the benefit of  the common schools of Utah. Female suffrage was abolished. It was made the duty  of the attorney general of the United States to proceed against the Church and  wind up its affairs and the title to all property except that “no building or  grounds appurtenant thereto held and occupied exclusively for the purpose of  the worship of God, or parsonage, or burial ground shall be forfeited”  be  transferred and escheated to the United States.

 

Proceedings in Escheatment

 

At the instance of the attorney general of the United States, suits were filed  July 30, 1887, against the Church, and the Perpetual Emigration Fund Company,  and their property was confiscated. November 5, 1887, United States Marshal Dyer  was appointed receiver, and took charge of the real and personal property of the  Church to control it.

 

While this infamous measure was before Congress there were many brave men who  stood up in the face of the popular clamor and almost united vindictiveness and  hatred of the Church, and denounced the high-handed proceedings. Such also had  been the case when previous legislation was enacted.

 

The government very graciously permitted the Church to occupy the tithing office  and historian’s office, at a yearly rental of $2,400; and the Gardo house at  $450 a month. The Temple Block was also retained by the payment of a stipulated  rent. All this happened in the United States in the year 1887, not in Spain or  Holland in the dark ages or the days of the Inquisition.

 

Death of President John Taylor

 

Early in the year 1887, because of persecution, President John Taylor and his  counselors were forced into exile. The trials and difficulties through which the  Church was passing weighed heavily upon the venerable President. He did not live  to see the final delivery of the Church property into the hands of a receiver.  He died in exile July 25, 1887, at the home of Thomas F. Roueche, at Kaysville,  Davis County, Utah, a martyr to the cause of truth which he espoused. At the  time of his passing his counselors were with him. His life had been one of  trial and suffering. He was a heroic character, strong in his convictions, just  in his dealings, uncompromising with evil. It is proper here to quote the words  of his counselors at the time of his death:

 

 “President John Taylor has been killed by the cruelty of officials who have, in  this territory, misrepresented the government of the United States. There is no  room to doubt that if he had been permitted to enjoy the comforts of home, the  ministrations of his family, the exercise to which he had been accustomed, but  of which he was deprived, he might have lived for many years yet. His blood  stains the clothes of men, who with insensate hate have offered rewards for his  arrest and have hounded him to the grave. History will yet call their deeds by  their right names” (Life of John Taylor  Roberts, p. 414).

 

Notes

 

1.  For a complete list giving information regarding the apostles and other  presiding brethren, see appendix.

 

 Chapter 51 The Administration of President Wilford Woodruff, 1887 through 1898

 

Changes in Leadership

 

Following the death of President Taylor the duty of presidency again devolved  upon the council of the apostles, Counselors Cannon and Smith resuming their  places with the twelve. The apostles continued to act in that position until the  April conference in 1889, when the First Presidency was again organized with  Wilford Woodruff as President. He selected George Q. Cannon and Joseph F. Smith  as his counselors. At the time of this organization President Woodruff was 82  years of age, but hale and vigorous. He was born in Farmington, Hartford  County, Connecticut, March 1, 1807; was baptized December 31, 1833, and  ordained an apostle April 26, 1839. President Woodruff was a natural missionary  and accomplished a great work in England and various parts of the United States.

 

The vacancies in the council of the twelve were not filled until the October  conference in 1889, when Marriner W. Merrill, Anthon H. Lund and Abraham H.  Cannon were called and ordained apostles.

 

Dedication of the Manti Temple

 

The temple at Manti, Sanpete County, was dedicated May 21, 1888, Elder Lorenzo  Snow offering the prayer. The services were repeated the two succeeding days.  This was the third temple to be dedicated in Utah. The site was chosen in June,  1875, by President Brigham Young, and the excavation was begun in April, 1877.  The corner stones were laid April 14, 1879, with the usual fitting ceremonies.  The building is situated on a hill north-east of the city and is an imposing  structure.

 

The Crusade Continues

 

The crusade against those who had entered plural marriage continued after the  death of President Taylor, but in some respects with less severity. President  Grover Cleveland pardoned a number of the imprisoned men against whom the courts  had been extremely severe. These included Joseph H. Evans, a man of seventy,  Charles Livingston and Rudger Clawson. From this time on there was a more  tolerant attitude manifested by some of the officers. Nevertheless the  government continued with unyielding determination to suppress plural marriage,  and more drastic legislation was proposed by Congress.

 

The Crusade in Idaho

 

In Idaho the anti-“Mormon” feeling was intense. One officer who afterwards was  honored with the position of United States senator from Idaho declared that he  had selected “a jury that would convict Jesus Christ.” Nor was this blasphemous  expression the only one uttered in that campaign. Men were hounded and treated  in an inhuman manner, and the boast was that “Mormons” would be convicted with  or without evidence before the courts.

 

The Idaho territorial legislature passed a law in 1885, containing the “Idaho  test oath,” which disfranchised all members of the Church. It provided that  electors should swear that they were neither polygamists nor members of an  organization which taught, advised or encouraged the practice of polygamy. The  supreme court of the United States sustained this law in a decision given  February 3, 1890. It was enough to deprive a person of the franchise simply to  declare that he was a member of the Church.

 

The Strubble Bill

 

The enemies of the Church in Utah were greatly elated over this decision of the  supreme court in the “Idaho test oath” law. They knew that no legislature in  Utah would pass such a measure, but they had hopes that Congress would, and thus  the great majority of the people of Utah would be disfranchised and their  enemies be placed in control. A bill called the Strubble Bill, following the  lines of the Idaho law was presented in Congress in 1890. Robert N. Baskin, who  was as bitter against the Saints as it was possible for him to be, brazenly  declared that the object was “to wrest from the hands of the Priesthood the  political power which it had wrongfully usurped and shamefully abused.” General  John A. McClernand, of the Utah Commission, refused to be a party to such  wickedness, and made a separate report condemning the proposed high-handed  legislation. This bill never became a law for several reasons. Many of the  conservative non-“Mormons” of Utah opposed the measure as being detrimental to  the interests of the territory, and petitioned Congress not to pass it.  Secretary of State James G. Blaine, used his influence to defeat the measure for  political reasons, but insisted that the Church do something to relieve the  situation.

 

President Woodruff’s Manifesto

 

While the Saints were in the midst of all these difficulties and afflictions,  President Wilford Woodruff sought the Lord for relief. In answer to his earnest  pleadings and constant petitions, the word of the Lord came to him in a  revelation suspending the practice of plural marriage. The Latter-day Saints,  with the feeling that the anti-polygamy legislation was a restriction of their  religious rights, contested every move made by the government. When the supreme  court sustained these laws, there was nothing left for the Church to do but  submit or stand as violators of the law. They have never felt that the action  of the courts were just, nor did they feel that it was within their power to  suspend a commandment given to them by revelation from the Lord. The “manifesto”  of President Woodruff brought relief. The people had done their duty. The Lord  gave them the commandment and only he could authorize its suspension. President  Woodruff, writing in his journal September 25, 1890 said:

 

 “I have arrived at a point in the history of my life as the President of the  Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints where I am under the necessity of  acting for the temporal salvation of the Church. The United States government  has taken a stand and passed laws to destroy the Latter-day Saints on the  subject of polygamy or patriarchal marriage, and after praying to the Lord and  feeling inspired, I have issued the following proclamation which is sustained by  my counselors and the twelve apostles.”

 

The same day the manifesto was published as follows:

 

 “OFFICIAL DECLARATION.”

 

“To Whom it May Concern:

 

“Press dispatches having been sent for political purposes from Salt Lake City,  which have been widely published, to the effect that the Utah Commission, in  their recent report to the secretary of the interior, alleged that plural  marriages are still being solemnized, and that forty or more such marriages have  been contracted in Utah since last June or during the past year: also that in  public discourses the leaders of the Church have taught, encouraged, and urged  the continuance of the practice of polygamy;

 

“I, therefore, as President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,  do hereby, in the most solemn manner, declare that these charges are false. We  are not teaching polygamy or plural marriage, nor permitting any person to enter  into its practice, and I deny that either forty or any other number of plural  marriages have during that period been solemnized in our temples or in any other  place in the territory.

 

“One case has been reported in which the parties alleged that the marriage was  performed in the Endowment House, in Salt Lake City, in the spring of 1889, but  I have not been able to learn who performed the ceremony. Whatever was done in  this matter was without my knowledge. In consequence of this alleged occurrence,  the Endowment House was, by my instruction, taken down without delay.

 

“Inasmuch as laws have been enacted by Congress, forbidding plural marriages,  which laws have been pronounced constitutional by the court of the Last Resort,  I hereby declare my intention to submit to those laws, and to use my influence  with the members of the Church over which I preside to have them do likewise.

 

“There is nothing in my teachings to the Church, or in those of my associates,  during the time specified, which can be reasonably construed to inculcate or  encourage polygamy, and when any elder of the Church has used language which  appeared to convey any such teaching, he has been promptly reproved. And I now  publicly declare that my advice to the Latter-day Saints is to refrain from  contracting any marriage forbidden by the law of the land.

 

“Wilford Woodruff.”  “President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”

 

The Manifesto Sustained

 

At the conference of the Church held in October following, the manifesto was  presented to the congregation and on motion by President Lorenzo Snow of the  council of the apostles, was accepted by the Latter-day Saints by unanimous  vote. Thus it became binding upon the members of the Church.

 

Following this action President George Q. Cannon delivered a discourse,  reviewing the history of the anti-polygamy legislation and justified the action  of President Woodruff on the following grounds: First, when a commandment is  given to the children of men, and they are hindered by their enemies, the Lord  accepts their offering. Second, the authority which gave the commandment had the  right to revoke. In the course of his remarks he quoted verses 49 and 50 of  section 124 in the Doctrine and Covenants.

 

President Woodruff followed the remarks of President Cannon and in part said:

 

 “I want to say to all Israel that the step which I have taken in issuing this  manifesto has not been done without earnest prayer before the Lord. . . . I am  not ignorant of the feelings that have been engendered through the course I have  pursued. But I have done my duty, and the nation of which we form a part must be  responsible for that which has been done in relation to this principle.

 

“The Lord has required at our hands many things that we have not done, many  things that we were prevented from doing. The Lord required us to build a temple  in Jackson County. We were prevented by violence from doing it. . . . It is not  wisdom for us to go forth and carry out this principle against the laws of the  nation.  . . . The Lord has given us commandments concerning many things, and we  have carried them out as far as we could; but when we cannot do it, we are  justified. . . . The Lord will never permit me or any other man who stands as  the President of this Church to lead you astray. It is not in the program. It is  not in the mind of God. If I were to attempt that, the Lord would move me out of  my place.”

 

Result of the Manifesto

 

Following the issuance of the manifesto the sentiment grew that those who had  entered into plural marriages before that date should not be interfered with,  and men were not to be compelled to desert their wives and children. In time the  two political parties, the “People’s Party” composed mostly of members of the  Church, and the “Liberal Party” composed of the enemies of the Church,  disbanded, and the people joined the two great national parties, the Democrats  and Republicans, without regard to religious affiliation. However, the more  rabid anti-“Mormons” held on to their animosities and organization until the  opposition to them among non-“Mormons” was so great that they could resist no  longer.

 

The Granting of Amnesty

 

December 19, 1891, the First Presidency and apostles petitioned for amnesty.  This petition was endorsed by the governor, Arthur L. Thomas, and Charles S.  Zane, who had again become chief justice, and many leading “Gentiles.” It was  read before the senate committee on territories and became a part of the  published record of that body. President Benjamin Harrison, who a short time  before had visited Utah, on January 4, 1893, issued a proclamation of amnesty to  polygamists for past offenses, limited to those who entered into that relation  before November 1, 1890. The Utah commission, acting on the pardon of the  President, ruled that the restrictions against voters in the territory should be  removed.

 

Laying the Capstone and Dedication of the Salt Lake Temple

 

One of the great events in the history of the Latter-day Saints was the  dedication of the Salt Lake Temple, April 6, 1893. As previously stated the  corner stones were laid forty years before  April 6, 1853. The capstone had been  laid April 6, 1892, by President Wilford Woodruff, in the presence of a vast  congregation numbering about forty thousand people. After the announcement from  the architect from the top of the building that the capstone was ready,  President Woodruff stepped before the people and said:

 

 “Attention, all the House of Israel, and all ye nations of the earth. We will  now lay the top stone of the Temple of our God, the foundation of which was laid  and dedicated by the prophet, seer and revelator, Brigham Young.”

 

He then pressed an electric button and the stone was laid. A mighty shout, of  “Hosanna! Hosanna! Hosanna! to God and the Lamb! Amen! Amen! Amen!” under the  direction of President Lorenzo Snow, went up from the people and was repeated  three times.

 

The dedicatory services, which commenced April 6, 1893, continued several days,  and each day the prayer was repeated, for the benefit of the great number of  members of the Church who, because of the limited space, could not attend the  first services in the building. The ceremonies were impressive and many of the  Saints saw visions of heavenly beings and other manifestations during the  dedication.

 

The Tabernacle Choir at the World’s Fair

 

At the World’s Columbian Exposition, held in Chicago in 1893, the Salt Lake  Tabernacle Choir entered the competition in the great choral contest which took  place early in September, and were successful in winning the second prize. It  was the general opinion of those who heard the contest that if it had not been  for prejudice they would have received the first honors. On their way to Chicago  and returning the choir gave concerts in the large cities, which was a means of  allaying much prejudice against the Church.

 

The Church and the Parliament of Religions

 

During this Exposition at Chicago, a World’s Parliament of Religions was held,  commencing September 11. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was not  invited to participate, but the Church authorities deemed it proper to seek  representation and steps to that end were taken. Elder Brigham H. Roberts, of  the first council of seventies, was selected to represent the Church at the  parliament. When he requested the privilege of taking part and of speaking  before that assembly, where Christians, Mohammedans, Jews and Pagans, had been  given a public hearing, the privilege was denied him. The manifestation of  bigotry was very marked, and the Church was given to understand it was “not of  the world.” Elder Roberts was granted the privilege of delivering a paper in one  of the committee rooms which would seat about fifty persons. This privilege  Elder Roberts very properly declined. The matter did not end there, however, as  Elder Roberts took the matter up in the press, and the bigotry of the officials  of the parliament was exposed, and the Church was benefited by the advertisement  thus received.

 

Statehood for Utah

 

Delegate Joseph L. Rawlins of Utah presented a bill in the house of  representatives, September 6, 1893, entitled “An Act to Enable the People of  Utah to Form a Constitution and State Government and to be Admitted into the  Union on an Equal Footing with the Original States.” The bill met some  opposition, one congressman (Morse of Massachusetts) declaring the people of  Utah were “criminals and vagabonds.” The bill, however, passed the house,  December 13, 1893, and the senate in July, 1894, and was signed by President  Grover Cleveland. Utah had made several attempts to obtain statehood and several  constitutional conventions had been held, but the opposition against the  “Mormon” people each time defeated the endeavor. Now both “Mormons” and  non-“Mormons” supported the movement, which was successful.

 

The Constitutional Convention

 

In the election held November 6, 1894, for delegates to the constitutional  convention, the Republicans were successful. The constitutional convention met  March 4, 1895, in Salt Lake City, and organized by electing John Henry Smith, a  member of the council of twelve apostles, as president. “Mormons” and “Gentiles”  who had opposed each other in the past sat side by side in this convention for  sixty-six days, framing the constitution of the state of Utah. When it was  presented to the people it was ratified by an overwhelming vote. President  Cleveland issued a proclamation, January 4, 1896, and Utah entered the great  Union of states. Heber M. Wells, son of Daniel H. Wells, was elected the first  governor, and Charles S. Zane the first chief justice of the newly created  state.

 

The Escheated Property Returned

 

In September, 1893, Delegate Joseph L. Rawlins presented in Congress a  resolution for the restoration of the personal property of the Church. The  resolution was favorably acted upon by Congress and President Cleveland signed  it October 25. The real estate, escheated to the government, was not returned  until three years later. In the last territorial legislature, in 1894, Mr.  Charles S. Varian, formerly United States attorney, presented a memorial to  Congress asking for this restoration, but the matter was not decided until after  Utah obtained statehood. President Cleveland, March 28, 1896, approved of a  memorial to this effect presented by one of Utah’s representatives in the senate  and which had passed both the senate and the house of representatives.

 

The Pioneer Jubilee

 

After Utah became a state, an era of good feeling prevailed among all the  people. Governor Heber M. Wells recommended in one of his messages to the  legislature, that the state hold an inter-mountain fair, or jubilee, during the  month of July, 1897, it being fifty years from the entrance of the pioneers into  the Salt Lake Valley. This recommendation was approved and a committee was  appointed to prepare for the celebration. On the first day (July 20) of the  celebration a monument which had been erected at the intersection of Main and  South Temple Streets, Salt Lake City, in honor of Brigham Young and the  pioneers, was unveiled and dedicated, by President Wilford Woodruff, one of the  pioneers. The statue of President Young, which is on a base of Utah granite,  was designed by Cyrus E. Dallin, a Utah-born artist, and was presented to the  state by the Brigham Young Memorial Association, the funds having been raised by  popular subscription. James H. Moyle made the presentation speech, and Governor  Wells the speech of acceptance. Judge Charles C. Goodwin, editor of the Salt  Lake Tribune , delivered an oration, and remarks were made by Brigham Young,  Jr., the oldest surviving son of President Young. The celebration continued  until the close of Pioneer Day, with parades, speeches, music and other  exercises. A badge of honor, made of gold and artistically designed, was  presented to each of the surviving pioneers of 1847, who were the honored  guests of the occasion.

 

Death of President Woodruff

 

One year later, July 24, 1898, the Pioneer Square  where the stockade was built  in 1847 was dedicated as a public park. President Woodruff delivered his last  public address at this celebration. A few days later he departed for the Pacific  coast hoping to benefit his health. He died at the home of Colonel Isaac Trumbo  in San Francisco, September 2, 1898. He had been very anxious to live to see the  Church out of debt, but this was not his privilege. Due to the escheatment of  its property, and the persecutions during the crusade, the Church was placed in  financial straits, but it was left for his successor to remedy the evil.

 

President Woodruff’s remains were brought to Salt Lake City, where a public  funeral was held in the tabernacle, September 8, and his memory was honored by  all the citizens of the state. President Woodruff, at the time of his death, was  in his ninety-second year. His life was one of marked simplicity and virtue. He  served for many years as Church historian, and kept remarkable journals,  recording in detail all important events of which he was a witness.

 

 Chapter 52 The Administration of President Lorenzo Snow. 1898 through 1901

 

The Presidency Re-organized

 

Eleven days after the death of President Wilford Woodruff the apostles met in  council and re-organized the First Presidency. Lorenzo Snow, then in his 85th  year, was sustained as President of the Church, and selected the same counselors  who had served with President Woodruff. The reason for this immediate action in  reorganizing the First Presidency was a statement by President Woodruff,  shortly before his death, that “it was not the will of the Lord that in the  future there should be a lengthy period elapsed between the death of the  president and the re-organization of the First Presidency.” At the October  conference (1898) the usual procedure was followed in presenting the new  officers of the presidency, and all the authorities of the Church were  unanimously sustained. Elder Rudger Clawson, president of the Box Elder Stake,  was called to the apostleship and was ordained, October 10.

 

President Lorenzo Snow

 

President Lorenzo Snow was born April 30, 1814, in Mantua, Portage County, Ohio.  In June, 1836, he was baptized by John F. Boynton, and the following winter was  ordained an elder. He immediately entered the ministry and was laboring in  Kentucky when the Saints were expelled from Missouri. In the early forties he  labored in Great Britain, his fields being Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham and  London. After the departure of most of the apostles from that mission he acted  as assistant to Elder Parley P. Pratt, who presided over the British Mission. He  returned to America in 1843 and made his home at Nauvoo. In 1849 he was called  to the apostleship, and took a mission to Italy, where he introduced the work,  but met with little success. During the anti-polygamy crusade he was sentenced  by Judge Orlando W. Powers, under the “segregation” ruling, to serve three terms  of imprisonment of six months each, making a period of eighteen months, and to  pay three fines of three hundred dollars each. The supreme court of Utah  confirmed the sentence and an appeal was taken to the court of last resort.  After he had served eleven months of his imprisonment the supreme court of the  United States reversed the ruling made in his case, denying the right of the  Utah judges to inflict punishment by “segregation,” and he was released from  confinement. This ruling also released others who had been illegally sentenced  by the judges of the Utah courts. President Snow was sustained as the president  of the Twelve Apostles when the First Presidency was re-organized in 1889, and  was also called to preside in the Salt Lake Temple when that building was opened  for work (1893), which position he retained until his death.

 

The Roberts Case

 

At the general election held November 8, 1898, Brigham H. Roberts (Democrat) and  a member of the presiding council of the seventies, was elected as Utah’s  representative in Congress, and Robert N. Baskin was elected to the Utah supreme  court. During the campaign much was said by the enemies of Mr. Roberts, because  he had a plural family, and the agitation became nationwide. It had been  understood when Utah became a state that there should be no more plural  marriages, and the Utah constitution contained a provision as follows:

 

 “That perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured and that no  inhabitant of said state shall ever be molested in person or property on account  of his or her mode of religious worship; provided, That polygamous or plural  marriages are forever prohibited.”

 

However it was not understood that those who had entered into that relation  should be barred from political rights. President Grover Cleveland, in  September, 1894, by proclamation, restored all political and civil rights to  those who had been disfranchised by the anti-polygamy legislation. Similar  action had previously been taken by President Benjamin Harrison. John Henry  Smith, president of the constitutional convention, was a polygamist, and Brigham  H. Roberts also served in that body without any question of opposition, and  helped to frame the constitution which prohibited plural marriage in the state.

 

Opposition of the Ministers

 

The opposition against Congressman Roberts was led by the Ministerial Alliance  of Salt Lake City, Attorney A. T. Schroeder, and the Salt Lake Tribune, which at  that time was the organ of the Republican party. Mr. Charles C. Goodwin, editor  of the Tribune, had served with B. H. Roberts in the constitutional convention  without a thought of opposition. It appeared now that the old question was to be  revived through religious and political hate, and that the harmony which had  prevailed was to come to an end. The Ministerial Alliance met December 6, 1898,  and prepared an address, which was signed by twenty-four “ministers of the  Gospel,” “most earnestly” calling upon the people of the United States to join  them in a protest against the seating of Congressman-elect Roberts of Utah. They  declared that the “Mormon” Church, in the election of Congressman Roberts, had  broken its pledge with the government.

 

Statement of President Snow

 

In a telegram to the New York World , December 29, 1898, President Snow stated,  officially and emphatically, in answer to the many false reports, that plural  marriages had ceased with the issuance of the manifesto by President Woodruff,  and that the Church had nothing to do with the nomination and election of B.  H.  Roberts, that matter being entirely a secular and political affair. The record  of the election showed that B. H. Roberts received greater support from the  non-“Mormons” than he did from the “Mormon” people.

 

Declaration of Senator Rawlins

 

In answer to the false accusations, Senator Joseph L. Rawlins (non-“Mormon”)  stated:

 

 “That polygamists should be disqualified to vote or to hold office was no part  of the compact between the state of Utah and the United States. In territorial  elections polygamists were so disqualified. But Congress purposely and knowingly  wiped away all such disqualifications as to the very first election to be held  under the enabling act, namely, the election of delegates to the Constitutional  Convention.”

 

Congressman Roberts Excluded

 

When B. H. Roberts was called to the bar of the house to be sworn in, Mr. Robert  W. Tayler of Ohio arose and moved that the question of the right of the  representative from Utah be referred to a committee of nine members of the  house, and until such committee made report, the said B. H. Roberts should not  be sworn in, or permitted to occupy a seat. The motion was carried, and after an  investigation of six weeks, seven of the members of the committee reported in  favor of his exclusion which should be determined by a majority vote; the other  two members of the committee favored admission of the Utah member, and then  expulsion afterwards. In the meantime many petitions from all parts of the  United States poured into Congress asking for his expulsion. January 25, 1900,  the matter came to a vote and bigotry prevailed. Congressman-elect Roberts was  excluded by a vote of 244 to 50 and 36 not voting. A number of those who voted  for the majority report confessed that they voted against their consciences and  in favor of public clamor that their own political lives might be saved. Having  been given a chance to make a defense, B.  H. Roberts spoke, making a vigorous  and telling protest against the bigoted action proposed against him.

 

The Issue of Church Bonds

 

Due to the financial difficulties in which the Church was placed because of  continued prosecution and persecution, it became necessary for some action to be  taken. It was decided that bonds be issued, and this was done in the sum of one  million dollars. The bonds were taken up by the people at home and local  interests, and by this aid the Church was able to meet its many obligations and  was saved from financial embarrassment.

 

The Law of Tithing

 

The administration of President Lorenzo Snow was noted particularly for the  teaching of the law of tithing, and the great reform among the members of the  Church in relation to that principle. This reform was inaugurated in the spring  of 1899, while the presidency were visiting the various settlements of the  Church in southern Utah. On the return journey from St. George the law of  tithing was made the special theme. This topic was continued in the sessions of  the Mutual Improvement conference held the latter part of May, and it became the  watchword, or slogan, of the various stakes. A resolution was unanimously  adopted in the Mutual conference, as follows:

 

 “Resolved: That we accept the doctrine of tithing, as now presented by President  Snow, as the present word and will of the Lord unto us, and we do accept it with  all our hearts; we will ourselves observe it, and we will do all in our power to  get the Latter-day Saints to do likewise.”

 

After a few remarks by Elder Francis M. Lyman in relation to the resolution,  President Snow remarked: “Brethren, the God of our fathers Abraham, Isaac and  Jacob bless you. Every man who is here, who has made this promise, will be saved  in the Celestial Kingdom. God bless you. Amen.”

 

The Solemn Fast Day

 

Following the Mutual conference, a solemn assembly of all the general  authorities and the officers of the various stakes, was held in the Salt Lake  Temple, Sunday, July 2, 1899. The day was also observed as a general fast day  according to the custom of the Church.1  The law of tithing was discussed among  other important topics, and here also a resolution was adopted by the assembled  brethren, six hundred and twenty-three officers of the Church being present,  that they would covenant with the Lord to observe this sacred law of tithing,  and teach the Saints to do the same. From that time forth the paying of tithes  and offerings on the part of the members was observed with increased interest,  although there still are many who do not faithfully observe this law.

 

Celebration of Mission Jubilees

 

The fiftieth anniversary of the introduction of the Gospel into Scandinavia was  celebrated with fitting ceremonies, Thursday, June 14, 1900, in the assembly  hall, Salt Lake City. Elder Anthon H. Lund, of the council of the apostles,  presided. The festivities continued until the 17th of June.

 

A similar celebration was held in December, 1900, at Honolulu, Hawaii, in  commemoration of the opening of the mission in the Hawaiian Islands. President  George Q. Cannon, one of the first missionaries to the land, was present as the  guest of honor. The Saints from the various islands assembled and engaged in a  time of feasting and refreshing and were instructed by President Cannon and many  others.

 

The Scofield Disaster

 

A sad occurrence which cast a cloud of gloom over Utah, was the explosion in  Mine number 4, at Winter Quarters, near Scofield, Carbon County, May 1, 1900.  About two hundred miners were killed, many of whom were members of the Church.  Elders George Teasdale, Heber J. Grant, and Reed Smoot, of the council of the  twelve attended the services which were held at Scofield, Sunday, May 6, 1900.  Governor Heber M. Wells appealed to the public for aid for the bereaved families  and the people of the state responded nobly.

 

The Japanese Mission

 

An event of great interest which occurred near the close of the ministry of  President Snow, was the opening of a mission in Japan. In keeping with the  commandment to preach the Gospel in all the world, President Snow was led to  send missionaries to the little brown people of the far East. Elder Heber J.  Grant, of the council of the apostles, was chosen February 14, 1901, to open  that mission. Later Elders Horace S. Ensign, Louis A. Kelsch and Alma O. Taylor,  were called to assist in that labor. These brethren departed for Japan, July 24,  1901, and arrived in Yokohama, August 12. The work of teaching the natives was  slow because of the many centuries of pagan teaching and the difficulty the  elders had in learning the language. After the return of the other brethren,  Elder Taylor remained in that land as president of the mission for nine years.  Work is still being conducted among the Japanese.

 

Death of President Snow

 

When the October conference was held in 1901, President Snow was ill and unable  to attend the opening sessions. Sunday afternoon, the third and closing day  (Oct. 6), he was present and, though somewhat feeble, made extended remarks. At  the close of his address the general authorities were sustained. Joseph F. Smith  was presented as first counselor in the Presidency President George Q. Cannon  having died April 12, 1901, in California and Rudger Clawson was presented as  second counselor. These brethren, however, were not set apart to these  positions, for President Snow returned from the conference and was confined to  his room in the Bee Hive House, where, four days later (Oct. 10), he died.  Funeral services were held in the tabernacle on the 13th, after which the body  was taken by special train to Brigham City, President Snow’s former home, and  there interred, in the presence of the general authorities of the Church and a  vast concourse of people.

 

Notes

 

1.  One day each month is set apart by the Church as a fast day. Before the  administration of President Wilford Woodruff the first Thursday in each month  was set apart for this purpose. December 6, 1896, a change in the day was made  and the first Sunday of each month has been observed as a general fast day for  the members of the Church since that time.

 

 Chapter 53 The Administration of President Joseph F. Smith. 1901 through 1918

 

The Presidency Re-organized

 

At the regular weekly meeting of the apostles, held in the Salt Lake Temple,  October 17, 1901, the First Presidency was re-organized. Joseph F. Smith, the  senior apostle, was sustained as President of the Church, and he selected John  R. Winder and Anthon H. Lund as his counselors. Brigham Young, Jr., was chosen  president of the council of the twelve apostles. John R. Winder, the first  counselor in the First Presidency, was at the time of his appointment second  counselor to Presiding Bishop William B. Preston. Anthon H. Lund was a member of  the council of apostles. Both counselors were men of wide experience, careful  and conservative, and well fitted for this new calling. One week later (Oct.  24) Hyrum Mack Smith, eldest son of President Joseph F. Smith, was called to  fill the vacancy in the council of the apostles.

 

A Special Conference

 

A special conference of the Church was held in the tabernacle, November 10,  1901, and the general authorities of the Church were sustained by the vote of  the people. Each quorum of the Priesthood voted separately, and then the entire  body of the Saints, according to the regular custom when a new First Presidency  is sustained.

 

President Joseph F. Smith

 

November 13, 1838, Joseph F. Smith was born at Far West, Missouri. A few days  before his birth his father Hyrum Smith and his uncle, Joseph Smith the Prophet,  and others, had been taken prisoners by the mob-militia of Missouri on the false  charge of treason, and were under sentence to be shot. As a child Joseph F.  Smith passed through the trying scenes of Missouri and Illinois, and in 1848  (Sept. 23) he entered the Salt Lake Valley with his mother. Although but a boy  nine years of age, he drove an ox team across the plains from the Missouri  River. In 1852 his mother, Mary Fielding Smith, died, and two years later, May  27, 1854, he left for a mission to the Hawaiian Islands, when but fifteen years  of age. He performed active and faithful missionary service in that land and  later in Great Britain and was ordained an apostle by President Brigham Young,  July 1, 1866. October 8, 1867, he was chosen as one of the council of the  twelve, succeeding Amasa M. Lyman. With the exception of the interim between  the administration of President Taylor and that of President Woodruff, he served  as a member of the First Presidency from October, 1880, until the death of  President Snow.

 

The Bureau of Information

 

An important step in the missionary work of the Church was the opening of the  “Bureau of Information and Church Literature,” August 4, 1902, on the temple  block. A small building for the entertainment of strangers and as a storehouse  for literature was erected in 1902, and the work was placed under the direction  of Benjamin Goddard, Thomas Hull, Arnold H. Schulthess and Josiah Burrows. About  seventy-five members of the Church were called to act as guides and entertain  visitors. Literature was freely distributed and much prejudice was removed. The  first year more than one hundred and fifty thousand persons visited the block,  and eighteen or twenty years later over four hundred thousand people, on the  average, passed through the grounds annually. In 1904 a more commodious building  was erected which has been added to from time to time until now an excellent  building stands upon the ground for the benefit and comfort of strangers.

 

The Reed Smoot Case

 

January 20, 1903, the legislature of Utah elected Reed Smoot United States  senator. He had been a candidate before, but stepped aside in favor of another.  April 8, 1900, he was called to the apostleship, and the anti-“Mormon” element  in Utah made this a pretext for entering a protest against his being seated. As  early as November 24, 1903, when it became known that he would be a candidate,  the Ministerial Alliance, an organization of Protestant ministers of Salt Lake  City, adopted resolutions in protest of his candidacy. Their grounds were that  he was an apostle of the “Mormon” Church, and believed in polygamy. They had  been successful in eliminating B. H. Roberts from political office in 1900, and  this gave them encouragement to press the matter further in their campaign to  disfranchise all the elders of the Church, and if successful, eventually all  members of the Church. B. H. Roberts was denied his seat on the grounds that he  was a polygamist; Reed Smoot was to be eliminated because he “believed in  polygamy” and was an apostle of the Church. It was commonly reported that if  Reed Smoot could be denied a seat in the senate, then any member of the Church  who had been through the temple could also be deprived of his franchise, and  this was the aim of these reverend gentlemen and their associates.

 

Protest of Citizens

 

January 25, 1903, nineteen citizens1 of Salt Lake City signed and forwarded to  the senate of the United States a formal protest asking for the expulsion of  Reed Smoot from the senate.2

 

In substantiation of these charges the protestants quoted from various sources,  including many newspaper reports utterly unreliable and false upon their very  face. The Rev. John L. Leilich also made separate affidavit stating among other  falsehoods that Reed Smoot was a polygamist. As this charge was untrue the  reverend gentleman was unable to prove his statements.

 

Senator Smoot Makes Reply

 

To all these charges Senator Smoot made full and complete denial in an answer in  the District of Columbia, January 4, 1904. March 5, 1903, he had been sworn in  as a senator and his case was referred to the committee on privileges and  elections of which Julius C. Burrows of Michigan was chairman. Mr. Robert W.  Tayler, of Ohio, who gained some prominence and notoriety in the case of B. H.  Roberts, was the attorney for the protestants. Senator Smoot was represented by  A. S. Worthington, of Washington, and Waldemar Van Cott, of Salt Lake City.

 

The Case Before the Senate

 

The case was first considered by the committee on privileges and elections,  January 16, 1904, and continued before that committee until June 1906. The  chairman, Julius C. Burrows, and other members of the committee manifested a  spirit of extreme hatred in the case. It was apparent from the beginning that it  was the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints that was on trial before the  nation, not Senator Reed Smoot. Many witnesses were called, including President  Joseph F. Smith and other leaders of the Church, who were treated with very  little consideration by the majority of the committee members. Thousands of  petitions asking for Reed Smoot’s expulsion poured into the senate from all over  the United States, and the spirit of prejudice ran high. During the two years of  the investigation the Church was thoroughly advertised before the world. The  press of the country, seeking for the sensational, grasped at every item of  evidence detrimental to the interest of the Church and magnified much of the  testimony, coloring it with additional falsehood. Nevertheless there appeared  from time to time friendly comments and articles in various quarters where men  were big and broad enough to face the prejudice of the world. It can be said in  perfect truth that the investigation, while carried on in the spirit of extreme  hatred, resulted beneficially for the Church.

 

The Case Decided

 

June 11, 1906, the committee made report to the senate. The majority report,  which was adverse to Senator Smoot, was signed by Chairman J. C. Burrows, and  supported by Senators J. P. Dolliver, Edmund W. Pettus, Fred T. Dubois, Joseph  Bailey, Lee S. Overman, and William A. Clark. They stated that “the more  deliberately and carefully the testimony taken in the investigation is  considered, the more irresistibly it leads to the conclusion that the facts  stated in the protest are true.”

 

The minority report, signed by Senators Joseph B. Foraker, Albert J. Beveridge,  William P. Dillingham, Albert J. Hopkins and Philander C. Knox, held to the  opposite view.

 

The case was called up in the senate, December 13, 1906, and continued before  that body a large number of the senators making speeches until February 20,  1907, when the final vote was taken. The resolution was amended so that it  required the concurrence of two thirds of the senators present. The vote stood  yeas 28, nays 42, and 20 not voting; consequently the result of the vote was  that the resolution was rejected, and Senator Smoot retained his seat.

 

The “American Party”

 

In January 1901, Thomas Kearns, a rich mining man, was elected by the  legislature to the United States senate to fill a four-year term, which had been  vacant for two years because the previous legislature failed to elect a senator.  Mr. Kearns was very anxious to be returned to the senate, and sought the support  of President Joseph F. Smith in other words the support of the Church which was  not given, and he was informed that the Church was not in politics. Having  obtained control of the Salt Lake Tribune he made it his personal organ of hate  against the Church in general and President Joseph F. Smith in particular. He  and others of like character, in the autumn of 1904, organized the “American  Party.” The excuse offered for this political party was the investigation going  on in the Reed Smoot case. This anti-“Mormon” political organization endured  from 1904 until 1911, and during those years captured the machinery of Salt Lake  City. A campaign of vindictive falsehood was conducted which was a disgrace and  a foul blot on the state of Utah. During this time the Tribune maliciously  cartooned, and wickedly vilified President Joseph F. Smith in its columns in a  manner that would not have been tolerated anywhere outside of Utah. Finally,  even anti-“Mormons” sickened of the condition, and the better element of the  “American Party” joined with other citizens and put an end to the obnoxious  condition.

 

President Smith’s Attitude

 

The only reply President Joseph F. Smith made to these vicious and daily  attacks, was to express himself as follows:

 

 “I feel in my heart to forgive all men in the broad sense that God requires of  me to forgive all men, and I desire to love my neighbor as myself; and to this  extent I bear no malice towards any of the children of my Father. But there are  enemies to the work of the Lord, as there were enemies of the Son of God. There  are those who speak only evil of the Latter-day Saints. There are those and they  abound largely in our midst who will shut their eyes to every virtue and to  every good thing connected with this latter-day work, and will pour out floods  of falsehood and misrepresentation against the people of God. I forgive them for  this. I leave them in the hand of the just Judge.”

 

The Case of John W. Taylor and M. F. Cowley

 

While the investigation at Washington was going on, Elders John W. Taylor and  Matthias F. Cowley were requested by the senate committee as witnesses.  President Smith was asked to locate them and have them go to Washington. In  answer to his appeal they declined to go. It was discovered that they were out  of harmony with the attitude of the Church regarding the manifesto of President  Woodruff. They maintained that the manifesto applied to the United States only.  However, the attitude of the Church was that it applied to the entire world.

 

Official Statement of President Smith

 

This led to the discovery that some plural marriages had been entered into  contrary to the announcement of President Woodruff, and also a statement made by  President Lorenzo Snow. Therefore, President Smith, at the general conference,  April 6, 1904, made the following official statement:

 

 “Inasmuch as there are numerous reports in circulation that plural marriages  have been entered into, contrary to the official declaration of President  Woodruff of September 24, 1890, commonly called the manifesto, which was issued  by President Woodruff, and adopted by the Church at its general conference,  October 6, 1890, which forbade any marriage violative of the law of the land, I,  Joseph F. Smith, President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,  hereby affirm and declare that no such marriages have been solemnized with the  sanction, consent, or knowledge of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day  Saints.

 

“And I hereby announce that all such marriages are prohibited, and if any  officer or member of the Church shall assume to solemnize or enter into any such  marriage, he will be deemed in transgression against the Church, and will be  liable to be dealt with according to the rules and regulations thereof and  excommunicated therefrom.

 

(Signed) “Joseph F. Smith.”  “President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”

 

This statement, on motion of Francis M. Lyman, was presented to the conference  and unanimously adopted. The agitation which followed led to the resignation,  October 28, 1905, of Elders John W. Taylor and Matthias F. Cowley from the  council of the apostles.

 

Dedication of the Joseph Smith Monument

 

Monday, December 18, 1905, President Joseph F. Smith and about twenty-five  others, including a number of the general authorities of the Church, left Salt  Lake City, for Sharon, Vermont, to dedicate a monument on the farm where Joseph  Smith the Prophet was born. This beautiful monument, with a polished granite  shaft thirty-eight and one-half feet high one foot for every year of the  Prophet’s life  had been erected under the direction of Elder Junius F. Wells.  December 23, 1905, the one hundredth anniversary of the Prophet’s birth, it was  dedicated and unveiled, President Smith offering the prayer. A short time before  this event the Mack farm, on which the monument stands, had been purchased by  the Church and a cottage built on the spot where the old home stood in which the  Prophet was born. Subsequently the Church purchased the Smith farm and Sacred  Grove, in Manchester township, New York.

 

President Smith Visits Europe

 

In the summer of 1906, President Joseph F. Smith and Presiding Bishop Charles W.  Nibley went to Europe and spent some time in each of the missions. This was the  first time a President of the Church, while holding that office, had stood on  Europe’s soil. It proved to be a great blessing to the Saints abroad and  encouraged and built them up in the faith. An incident worthy of record which  occurred on that trip was the remarkable healing of John Roothoff, a boy eleven  years of age, residing in Rotterdam. The youth was blind, but learning that  President Smith would be present he said to his mother: “If you will take me  with you to meeting and he (President Smith) will look into my eyes, I believe  they will be healed.” He was permitted to accompany his mother, and at the  close of the services President Smith greeted each individual and shook hands  with them. As the mother presented her son, President Smith raised the bandage  on his eyes, and blessed him. When he returned home the boy said: “Mamma, my  eyes are well, I can’t feel any more pain. I can see now, and far, too.”

 

The Address to the World

 

At the general conference of the Church in April, 1907, which was held shortly  after the settlement of the case against Senator Smoot, the First Presidency of  the Church issued an “Address to the World” which was read to, and adopted by,  the conference. It set forth clearly the attitude of the Church respecting many  matters which had been discussed during the hearing at Washington, and was also  a reply to numerous magazine articles which appeared about that time written  expressly for the injury of the Church.

 

It was stated in this address, in answer to the many false accusations, that the  Church had respectfully submitted to the law enacted against plural marriage.  “If it is urged that there have been instances of the violation of the  anti-polygamy laws,” the document read, “the plain answer is that in every state  and nation there are individuals who violate law in spite of all the vigilance  that can be exercised; but it does not follow that the integrity of a community  or a state is destroyed, because of such individual transgressions. All we ask  is that the same common-sense judgment be exercised in relation to our community  that is accorded to other communities.” It was also declared that the Church  stood for the “absolute separation of Church and State; no domination of the  State by the Church; no State interference with the functions of the Church, or  with the free exercise of religion; the absolute freedom of the individual from  the domination of ecclesiastical authority in political affairs; the equality of  all churches before the law.

 

“The reaffirmation of this doctrine and policy, however, is predicated upon the  express understanding that politics in the States where our people reside shall  be conducted as in other parts of the Union; that there shall be no interference  by the State with the Church, nor with the free exercise of religion. Should  political parties make war upon the Church, or menace the civil, political, or  religious rights of its members as such against a policy of that kind, by any  political party or set of men whatsoever, we assert the inherent right of  self-preservation for the Church, and her right to call upon all her children,  and upon all who love justice, and desire the perpetuation of religious liberty,  to come to her aid, to stand with her until the danger shall have passed. And  this openly, submitting the justice of our cause to the enlightened judgment of  our fellow men, should such an issue unhappily arise. We desire to live in  peace and confidence with our fellow citizens of all political parties and of  all religions.”

 

Changes in the Presidency

 

President John R. Winder, first counselor in the First Presidency, died March  27, 1910. At the general conference in April following, Anthon H. Lund was  advanced to the position of first counselor, and John Henry Smith was chosen as  second counselor in the presidency. President John Henry Smith died October 13,  1911, and Elder Charles W. Penrose was chosen to succeed him, in the following  December. The presiding patriarch, John Smith, died November 6, 1911, and his  grandson, Hyrum G. Smith, was sustained in that calling at the general  conference of the Church, April 6, 1912.

 

The Saints in Mexico

 

During the year 1912, on account of civil war in Mexico and the constant raid of  banditti and guerillas, the members of the Church residing in the Juarez Stake  were robbed and persecuted and finally forced to seek refuge in the United  States. With the hope that they would again return to their homes most of them  located near the border, but as time passed and the condition did not improve, a  large number moved away and located in other stakes, abandoning their property  in Mexico. Some who remained near the border have again returned to their homes,  and there is some prospect (1921) that they may be partially reimbursed for  their losses.

 

The World War

 

In the summer of 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of  Austria-Hungary, was murdered by a Serbian student. This event caused strained  relations to exist between Austria and Serbia. Austria, backed by Germany, was  not willing to accept the conciliatory note of the smaller country, which did  everything possible to avoid a rupture, and declared war July 28, 1914. The  action was followed by a declaration of war by Germany against Russia on a  pretext, August 1. Germany also made an attack on France, attempting to go  through Belgium, against the wishes of that kingdom, to expedite their  advancement. The invasion of Belgium brought Great Britain into the conflict,  and eventually most of the countries of the earth were drawn into the war. Due  to Germany’s ruthless submarine campaign on the high seas, the United States  was forced to declare war against that power, April 6, 1917. Those nations which  were not actually aligned with one or the other hostile force, were caused to  suffer great privation and hardship. The great conflict continued until November  11, 1918, when an armistice was declared, which later resulted in a treaty of  peace, Germany and her Allies, Austria-Hungary and Turkey, being required to pay  enormous war indemnity. Millions of lives were sacrificed and billions in  property destroyed during the four years of actual conflict, and at the close  the nations found themselves on the verge of bankruptcy.

 

During the first year (1917) the United States was in the war, 3,854 members of  the Church were in the army; 616 in the navy; 196 in the marines and over 800 in  other branches of the service, including the Red Cross and medical corps. By the  early part of January, 1919, there were 14,975 members of the Church in the  service. Between six and seven hundred lost their lives during the period of the  war.

 

The Fulfilment of Prophecy

 

The world war was a further fulfilment of the prophecy on war, given to Joseph  Smith, Christmas day, 1832, wherein the revelation states that “the days will  come that war will be poured out upon all nations.” This revelation on war was  partly fulfilled during the rebellion of the Southern States, which was the  beginning of the end, according to the revelation. There are yet other things  pertaining to war and the vexation of the nations, spoken of in that prophecy,  which are to be fulfilled.

 

A Period of Prosperity

 

The administration of President Joseph F. Smith was noted chiefly for the  prosperity and advancement of the Church during the seventeen years of his  presidency. The work spread abroad in the earth as well as in the stakes of  Zion. Meeting houses and tabernacles, with all the modern conveniences, were  erected in many stakes and wards. Even in the mission fields commodious  headquarters and churches were purchased or built in various places. The Dr.  Groves Latter-day Saints Hospital, one of the best in the country, was erected.  Two large and important structures, the Bishop’s Building and the Church Office  Building, were built for the purpose of taking care of the various offices and  departments of Church work. The Church school system was advanced and enlarged,  and the very best facilities were obtained for the education of the youth of  Zion. Two temples, one at Cardston, Canada, and one at Laie, Hawaii, were under  course of erection, and the work for the salvation of the dead received an  impetus which filled the present temples to overflowing. The Church was placed  in a position to command the respect of all honest men. Prejudice was overcome,  and the great men of our nation commenced to look upon the Latter-day Saints  with more kindly feelings.

 

The Passing of President Smith

 

In the spring of 1918, President Smith commenced to fail in health, and during  the late summer and fall he attended to most of his business matters in his own  room, spending very little time at the office. He would generally take a short  automobile ride in the afternoon, from which he received great benefit. During  the October conference (1918) he was improved and presided at all the sessions.  His opening address was heard in all parts of the tabernacle, but was not  delivered with his usual physical vigor. After the conference he was again  confined to his room the greater part of his time. October 3, 1918, the day  before the conference convened, he received a remarkable manifestation in which  much additional light was revealed regarding the salvation of the dead and the  visit of the Savior to the world of spirits after his crucifixion. He made  reference, indirectly, to this vision in his remarks at the conference, but it  was not published until December, having first been submitted, October 31, to  the counselors in the presidency and the apostles and patriarch and unanimously  accepted by them.

 

Sunday, November 17, 1918, President Smith was taken with an attack of pleurisy  which continued to grow in intensity, finally developing into pleuro-pneumonia,  and he passed away, Tuesday morning, November 19. No public funeral could be  held as the city was under quarantine because an epidemic of influenza was over  all the land. Thousands of people lined the streets as the cortege passed and  services in the cold open air were held at the grave, where brief remarks were  made by President Heber J. Grant and Bishop Charles W. Nibley. President Anthon  H. Lund had charge of the services and President Charles W. Penrose dedicated  the grave.

 

Notes

 

1.  These nineteen were: Rev. William M. Paden, Parley L. Williams, Edward B.  Critchlow, E. W. Wilson, Charles C. Goodwin, L. W. Colbath, William A. Nelden,  Rev. Clarence T. Brown, Ezra Thompson, J.  J. Corum, George R. Hancock. W. Mont  Ferry, Rev. John L. Leilich, Harry C. Hill, Clarence E. Allen, George M. Scott,  S. H. Lewis, H. G. McMillan and Rev. Abiel Leonard. L. W. Colbath later withdrew  his name.

 

 2. This protest was divided under six heads as follows:

 

1. The Mormon Priesthood according to the doctrine of that Church, is vested  with supreme authority in all things temporal and spiritual.

 

2. The first presidency and twelve apostles are supreme in the exercise and  transmission of the mandates of this authority.

 

3. As this body of men has not abandoned the principles and practices of  political dictation, so also it has not abandoned belief in polygamy and  polygamous cohabitation.

 

4. That this is the attitude of the first presidency and apostolate, even since  the suspensory manifesto of 1890, is evidenced by their teachings since then.

 

5. This body of officials, of whom Senator-elect Smoot is one, also practice or  connive at and encourage the practice of polygamy and polygamous cohabitation,  and those whom they have permitted to hold legislative office have, without  protest or objection from them, sought to pass a law nullifying enactments  against polygamous cohabitation.

 

6. The supreme authorities in the Church, of whom Senator-elect Reed Smoot is  one, to-wit, the first presidency and twelve apostles, not only connive at  violation of, but protect and honor the violators of the laws against polygamy  and polygamous cohabitation.

 

 Chapter 54 The Administration of President Heber J. Grant. 1918 through

 

President Heber J. Grant

 

By virtue of his position as president of the council of apostles, Heber J.  Grant became the presiding officer of the Church at the death of President  Smith. Heeding the instruction of President Wilford Woodruff which was given by  revelation, and was followed by Presidents Snow and Smith that the First  Presidency should be organized without delay, the council of apostles met  November 23, 1918, in the temple, and Heber J. Grant was sustained and set apart  as President of the Church. He selected as his counselors Anthon H. Lund and  Charles W. Penrose, who had served with President Joseph F. Smith.

 

President Grant was born November 22, 1856, in Salt Lake City. He is the son of  Jedediah Morgan and Rachel Ridgeway Ivins Grant. He is a man of great activity  and endless energy; full of sympathy for the down-trodden and the poor. In the  financial world he is recognized as a man of keen ability, yet his life has been  constantly devoted to the welfare and progress of the Church, his labors in the  ministry dating from his early youth. In 1880 he was called to preside over the  Tooele Stake of Zion, succeeding Francis M. Lyman who had been called into the  council of the twelve. Two years later (October 16, 1882) he was himself  ordained an apostle, having been called, with Elder George Teasdale, to that  office by revelation. In 1901 he went to Japan and there opened the door for the  preaching of the Gospel, and after his return he was called to preside over the  European mission, where he labored for three years.

 

The General Conference Postponed

 

Because of the influenza epidemic no meetings were held during the winter and  spring of 1919. On this account, the general conference, which otherwise would  have been held in April, was postponed until June 1, 1919. On that occasion the  solemn assembly of the Priesthood was held, and the authorities of the Church  were sustained by the usual separate vote of the quorums. That conference was  devoted largely to a memorial service for President Joseph F. Smith.

 

Dedication of the Hawaiian Temple

 

Thanksgiving day, November 27, 1919, the temple at Laie, Hawaii, was dedicated  by President Heber J. Grant. He was accompanied to that land by President Anthon  H. Lund, Rudger Clawson, Stephen L. Richards, Presiding Bishop Charles W. Nibley  and Arthur Winter. The dedicatory services were repeated, five services being  held to accommodate all the people 1,239 souls attending the services. This is  the first temple erected outside of the continental United States, and is for  the benefit of the native Saints of the islands of the Pacific, The mission in  the Hawaiian Islands was opened in 1850 by George Q. Cannon and others, and  thousands of the natives received the Gospel. The site for the Hawaiian temple  was dedicated by President Joseph F. Smith, June 1, 1915.

 

Passing of President Lund. Changes in the Presidency

 

After a brief illness, President Anthon H. Lund, first counselor in the  presidency, passed away at his home in Salt Lake City, March 2, 1921. He served  in the presidency during the entire ministry of President Joseph F. Smith,  having been chosen second counselor in October, 1901. After the death of John R.  Winder, the first counselor, he was advanced to that position in April, 1910.  President Lund was a man without guile, faithful and true to the Gospel and to  the brethren, and beloved by all the Saints.

 

At the meeting of the council of the presiding authorities held in the Salt Lake  Temple, Thursday, March 10, 1921, President Charles W. Penrose was chosen by  President Heber J. Grant as his first counselor, and Elder Anthony W. Ivins as  his second counselor. Rudger Clawson was at the same time, set apart as  president of the twelve apostles, as he became the ranking apostle after the  death of President Lund.

 

Conclusion

 

At the general conference of the Church held in April, 1920, the one hundredth  anniversary of the Prophet’s vision of the Father and the Son, was fittingly  observed. The remarks of the brethren who spoke had a bearing on the great work  accomplished by the Prophet and the authenticity of his vision. The Improvement  Era, the organ of the priesthood quorums of the Church, and the Young Men’s  Mutual Improvement Association, devoted the April number to special articles  dealing with the theme of the Vision, and other magazines did the same. A  cantata by Evan Stephens, “The Vision,” which was prepared for the occasion, was  rendered before a crowded house in the tabernacle, and special topics were  considered in the several wards, following the conference.

 

Ninety years before (1830) the Church was organized with but six members. In  1920 it numbered several hundred thousands. Its property in meeting houses,  tabernacles, temples and other necessary buildings, was valued at many millions  of dollars. There were 831 stakes of Zion, 871 organized wards and 83 branches  within those stakes. Missionary work had been carried to various parts of the  earth, and there were 24 regularly established missions with numerous  conferences and branches. Each stake of Zion contained a high priests’ quorum,  and there were 209 quorums of seventy. The total number of men holding the  Melchizedek Priesthood was 57,600 and the total number holding the Aaronic  Priesthood was 49,780. Many thousands of young people were enrolled in the  auxiliary organizations of the Church, and it was conceded by many ministers of  other churches, that the “Mormon” Sunday Schools were the best that could be  found in all the world.2

 

The Church at the close of the first one hundred years of its history, dating  from the Prophet’s vision in 1820, was looked upon as a power in the earth for  good by the great and wise men of the nations. Knowledge of its work had been  brought to the attention of kings, presidents and rulers of the earth. The  prospects before it for advancement and growth were bright, and it appeared that  the prophecy of Isaiah was about to be fulfilled:

 

 “Go through, go through the gates; prepare ye the way of the people; . . . lift  up a standard for the people.

 

“Behold the Lord hath proclaimed unto the end of the world, Say ye to the  daughter of Zion, Behold, thy salvation cometh; behold, his reward is with him,  and his work before him.

 

“And they shall call them, The holy people, The redeemed of the LORD; and thou  shalt be called, Sought out, A city not forsaken.”  Isaiah 62:10 through 12

 

Notes

 

1.  Three other stakes have since been organized.

 

2.  At a synod held in Salt Lake City, in September 1921, at which the ministers  of the Episcopal Church of the Fourth Province of the Pacific assembled, Rev. W.  F. Bulkley said: “We may learn much from the Mormon Church; it has the best  Sunday school organization of any church in the world.”  Salt Lake Tribune,  September 9, 1921, p. 15.

 

 Appendix: The Auxiliary Organizations of the Church

 

In addition to the quorums of the priesthood, there are in the Church a number  of helpful organizations known as the auxiliary organizations. These are: The  National Woman’s Relief Society, The Deseret Sunday School Union, The Young  Men’s Mutual Improvement Association, The Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement  Association, and The Primary Association. There are two other organizations  which are not classed as auxiliaries, namely, The Religion Classes an adjunct of  the Church School system  and the Genealogical Society of Utah, which is closely  related in its work to the temples.

 

A brief statement of the organization, accomplishments and aims of these  societies is here given.

 

The National Woman’s Relief Society

 

The Relief Society, now known as the National Woman’s Relief Society, was  organized in Nauvoo, March 17, 1842, by Joseph Smith, the Prophet, assisted by  Elders John Taylor and Willard Richards. The object of the society, as stated by  the Prophet, was “to look after the wants of the poor, to search after objects  of charity, and to administer to their wants; to assist by correcting the morals  and strengthening the virtues of the community, and thus to save the elders the  trouble of rebuking.” He also expressed the desire that the society might be  built up in a most high and acceptable manner, and should be a select company of  the virtuous, and those who would walk circumspectly. One feature of the work  of the society should be to purge out iniquity, surmount difficulties, “though  the soul be tried, the heart faint, and hands hang down.” The members should  observe the laws of God, hearken to counsel and keep free from the evils of the  world, and be “choice, virtuous and holy.”

 

This organization, composed exclusively of the women of the Church, now (1922)  numbers about fifty thousand members. It has accomplished a wonderful work in  the care of the poor, alleviating the distress of the needy, the sick and  afflicted, comforting those who mourn and preparing the dead for burial. All  this work, and much more, which would fill volumes, has been accomplished in the  spirit of true charity and love by the members, who unitedly endeavor to carry  out the admonition and instruction given by President Joseph Smith at the time  of the organization in 1842.

 

Outlines have been prepared from year to year and a course of study presented to  the members by which they are trained not only in their duties as members of the  society, but also in various branches of education, to the intent that they may  be better equipped for the duties of life.

 

The Deseret Sunday School Union

 

In the fall of 1848, a little more than a year after the arrival of the  pioneers, Richard Ballantyne came to the Salt Lake Valley with his family. He  located in the old fort and the following spring made plans for a home. He  arranged his building to provide for the holding of a Sunday School, and on  Sunday, December 9, 1849, the first Sunday School in the Rocky Mountains was  held at his home, Elder Ballantyne being both superintendent and teacher. His  Sunday School was popular among the members of the Church and was well attended  until the year 1850, when a chapel was erected in the Fourteenth Ward into which  the Sunday school was transferred. Not long after this other Sunday schools were  organized in Salt Lake City and in a number of other settlements in Utah.  However, there was no uniformity of method or course of study in these schools.

 

The possibility of the Sunday school as an agency for teaching the Gospel to the  youth was early recognized and the importance of uniformity and co-operation in  this task was urged early in 1866. In November, 1866, as a result of the growing  sentiment, a meeting was called at which a general organization was effected for  the purpose of concentrating and unifying Sunday school efforts. Elder George Q.  Cannon was elected president of the organization which was called the Deseret  Sunday School Union. The scope of the activity of the Deseret Sunday School  Union is Church-wide, and its purpose is to establish uniformity in Sunday  school methods, to develop greater teaching efficiency, and through co-operation  to improve the quality of the work done. The Juvenile Instructor, first  published by Elder George Q. Cannon early in 1856, is the official organ of the  Deseret Sunday School Union, and is a potent factor in accomplishing these  results. It contains uniform lessons for each department in the Sunday schools.  Teacher-training work, as a means of developing greater teaching efficiency,  was first undertaken by the Sunday schools under the leadership of the general  board. This movement has since attained Church-wide application under the  leadership and direction of the Priesthood.

 

As an organization, auxiliary to the Priesthood, the ultimate aim of the Sunday  schools is to teach the principles of the Gospel and to stimulate the pupils to  render willing obedience thereto. More specifically, the Sunday school aims so  to equip its members that they will be able not only to work out their own  salvation through the application of, and obedience to, the principles of the  Gospel which they have been taught, but also to prepare themselves for service  in the Priesthood, in the mission fields, and in the organizations at home,  through which opportunities are afforded them to render service to others. The  Sunday school recognizes no age limit, but aims to accommodate all grades of  spiritual development from infancy to old age.

 

From a membership of 50 pupils in the first Sunday school, the enrollment has  increased until in 1920 there were 970 Sunday schools in the organized stakes of  Zion with an enrollment of 170,164 pupils and 18,184 officers and teachers. The  Sunday school work and organization extend into the missions where there are 596  schools which have an enrollment of 25,189 pupils, and 4,623 officers and  teachers. The Sunday school in the mission field is recognized as the best means  of arousing interest in the work of the Church and as a step toward the  establishing of branches.  Albert Hamer Reiser, general secretary.

 

The Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations

 

The Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations of the Church of Jesus Christ of  Latter-day Saints were begun in the year 1875, the first organization having  been effected in the Thirteenth ward, Salt Lake City, on the 10th day of June,  that year, by Junius F. Wells, under the immediate instruction and direction of  President Brigham Young. In 1921 there were 796 associations in the 871 wards  and 86 stakes of the Church, with an active membership of 43,562 and a force of  officers of 6,116. In 22 missions of the Church there are a large number of  associations, with an encouraging membership; and much good is being  accomplished for and by the young people. The organization is supervised by a  general board under the direction of the general authorities of the Church. A  central organization consisting of a superintendent, two assistants, the  secretary, treasurer, and several aids, has charge in each stake. Each ward is  officered by a president, two counselors, secretary, treasurer, class leaders,  scoutmaster, and other assistants for special work in music, recreation,  athletics, leisure-time activities, etc. Standing committees in all the  organizations look after the details of the work. The Y. M. M. I. A. as an  auxiliary organization, while independent in its actions, studies, recreation  and general activity, is under the controlling influence of the general stake  and ward officers of the Church. At the organization, President Brigham Young  stated the keynote of the work of these organizations to be “the establishment  in the youth of individual testimony of the truth and magnitude of the great  latter-day work; the development of the gifts within them that have been  bestowed upon them by the laying on of hands of the servants of God; cultivating  a knowledge and an application of the eternal principles of the great science of  life.” This great body of young men appeals for place and opportunity to work,  to offer a helping hand in building up the Church of Christ, and to lend  effective service to their fellowmen and in the cause of God. They stand for the  mutual improvement of the youth of Zion. Their souls are thrilled with the grand  vision of the future, and their hearts with the testimony of the glorious  destiny of God’s “marvelous work and a wonder” of the latter days. The aim of  their organization is, first, to impress them and all the youth of Israel with a  testimony of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, as restored through Joseph the  Prophet, and to this end they seek all useful knowledge by which they may be  helpful in its establishment. They desire to learn to preside over public  assemblies, to express themselves before the public, to study and to practice  religious, civil, vocational, social and recreational, scientific and  educational affairs, and to be trained in all that pertains to religious, moral,  physical and intellectual advancement. The further object of the organization is  to answer every desire of the young men of our community for excellence and  enjoyment, and to provide for the gratification of every legitimate ambition and  impulse to excel in these fields of endeavor without having to seek opportunity  elsewhere. In a word, the aim of the Y. M. M. I. A. is to assist every young man  to “complete living on the foundation of faith in God and his great latter-day  work;” or, in other words, to live in perfect harmony with the established  standards of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

The activities of the organization consists in the adoption of many interesting  and attractive details for work and service, including advanced senior, senior,  and junior studies, in new and attractive manuals; scout work; recreational  programs; leisure-time activities, and other features of marked interest to  young people. Their organization presents to them fascinating programs to hold  their attention in the wonderful business of building characters in their own  lives, and in establishing faith in God and his great latter-day work.

 

For a general heading for some of the declarations that this organization has  made, and for which the young men stand, it is fitting to use the words of the  Psalmist: “In the name of our God we will set up our banners.” To this end they  present the following slogans: “We stand for a sacred Sabbath and a weekly half  holiday; for a weekly home evening; for state and nation-wide prohibition; for  thrift and economy; for service to God and country; for spiritual growth through  attendance at sacrament meetings; for the non-use and non-sale of tobacco; and  for loyal citizenship.”

 

Some trust in the wealth of mines, some in the riches of the earth, others  gather houses and lands, or lean upon the learning and wisdom of men; but even  as David, God’s servant of old, the Y. M.  M. I. A. declare: “We will remember  the name of the Lord our God. He will hear us from his holy heaven, hear and  fulfil our petitions and redeem us with the saving strength of his right hand.”  Setting up these slogans and ideals and, adding thereto, as the years go by, all  helpful and useful knowledge and service, we will not only remember the name of  the Lord our God, but will rejoice in his salvation, and in his name will seek  to conquer evil and establish righteousness.  Edward H. Anderson, Editor of the  Improvement Era.

 

The Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association

 

The Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association had its origin in the  Retrenchment Association, organized by President Brigham Young in the Lion House  on November 28, 1869. Its membership consisted entirely of his own daughters,  Ella Young being president, with Emily, Zina, Maria, Carlie, Phebe, and Dora  Young as associate officers. The purpose of this Retrenchment Association, as  President Young expressed it, was “to retrench in dress, in speech, in  everything that is bad and worthless, and to improve in everything that is good  and beautiful.” He also stated that he wished his daughters and the girls of the  Church generally to gain for themselves a knowledge and testimony of the Gospel.

 

Associations of other young women were soon patterned after the original one and  later the name was changed to Mutual Improvement Association to harmonize with a  similar organization which had been formed among the young men. In 1880 the  general board was organized with Elmina S. Taylor, president; Margaret Y.  Taylor, and Martha Home Tingey as counselors.

 

The fundamental aim has always been to give religious and moral instruction and  in addition such other lines of work as will help to prepare girls for their  true position in the home and community life. Courses in the study of the  standard works of the Church, and in literature, home economics, ethics,  history, etc., have been provided.

 

In connection with the Young Men’s Association, a line of work designated as  “special activities” is conducted. This comprises music, public speaking,  story-telling, declamation, drama, debating, etc. Much of the social work of the  Church is under the direction of the two associations.

 

The official organ of the Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association is the  Young Woman’s Journal , a monthly magazine. This reflects the spirit of the  organization and is the medium through which the general board reaches the stake  and ward officers and members of the association. It has a subscription of about  18,000.

 

The junior members of the association are known as bee-hive girls, the work  provided being of the nature of the camp fire work and parallel to that of the  boy scouts. There are some 14,000 bee-hive girls, in age from 14 to 16 years.  There are also senior classes in all of the local associations and advanced  senior classes in the majority of them.

 

The present total membership (April 1, 1921) is 44,681. Two hundred seventy-six  of this number are giving services in the Mission Field.  Clarissa Beesley,  general secretary.

 

The Primary Association

 

The need of child culture and special religious training for the children was  the motive that prompted the organization of the Primary Association in the  Church. The Lord has placed the responsibility of the training of the children  of Church members on the shoulders of the parents, where it properly belongs.  However, in the multitude of duties it is necessary that some help be extended  to assist the parents in the important labor, and the various auxiliary  organizations were given for this purpose.

 

The following account of the origin and aims of the Primary Association is  furnished by that organization:

 

“The Primary Association originated at Farmington, Davis County, Utah, where the  first meeting was held on the 25th day of August, 1878.

 

“For some time previous, Sister Aurelia S. Rogers, the pioneer in this work, had  reflected with much seriousness upon the need of a more strict guardianship over  the boys and girls of Zion. She felt the necessity for more religious and moral  training than they were then receiving; believed that children should be taught  to beautify the home with the workmanship of their own hands, and learn to  cultivate a love for music, for flowers, and for the beautiful in all things.

 

“The matter was brought to the attention of Sister Eliza R. Snow and a  consultation was held with President John Taylor, Emmeline B. Wells, and others,  resulting in a decision to organize what is now known as ‘The Primary  Association.’ It was resolved that the instruction should be of religious and  moral character in all that tends toward the development of upright men and  women.

 

“Accordingly, on the 11th of August, 1878, Aurelia S. Rogers was set apart to  preside over a Primary Association in Farmington. The ward was systematically  visited and the name of every child recorded. Two weeks later the children were  called together, the object of the work was explained to them, and the career of  the association began. In addition to the meeting where general instructions  were given including lessons on obedience, faith in God, prayer (individual and  in concert), punctuality, and good manners, there were program and testimony  meetings. A quarterly gathering was held every three months to which the parents  were invited and a special program rendered. Lessons were given on the planting  of beans and corn, to be stored for times of famine, in the making of rag  carpets for use in Church buildings; and much emphasis was laid on the necessity  for obedience to the word of wisdom.

 

“Similar associations were organized in other places, and on the 19th day of  June, 1880, Sister Louie B. Felt, then president of the Eleventh Ward  Association in Salt Lake City, was called to preside over the Primary  Associations of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in all the  world.”

 

There are 873 associations in the Church, with a total enrollment of 70,816  officers and children.

 

The Religion Classes

 

Since the first year after the Church was organized it has maintained schools in  which religion has been taught. Even in their early persecutions and drivings,  whenever a sufficient number of members settled in any locality long enough to  justify it, some suitable person was selected to teach and a school was  organized. Religion was always a prominent study in them, and the study of the  Bible was common in most of the schools of the nation.

 

When the schools began to be maintained by the state, however, and people of all  religious beliefs were obliged to pay taxes for their support, the Bible and all  religious teachings were banished from the public schools because of the  jealousy of the patrons over religious tenets. When this movement reached the  settlements of our people in the West they yielded to it, but with deep  disappointment, and to make up this loss the authorities of the Church  established a system of Religion Classes to be held before or after school, and  taught by volunteer teachers who serve without pay.

 

In these Religion Classes the more practical principles of the Gospel are  taught, and in such a way as to induce to good and noble actions. The  organization and methods of teaching resemble those of the day school whose work  they are designed to supplement. Up to the present time these classes are held  only once a week, except in a few instances, but the original purpose and  ultimate aim is to have them meet daily as other day school classes. In this way  the religious and moral elements, now so lacking in the work of the public  schools and so much needed to guide and control intellectual efficiency, will be  supplied, and a more balanced development secured.

 

The Religion Classes are a part of the Church School system and are under the  supervision of the Church Commissioners of Education. Classes are organized in  almost every ward in the Church and about 50,000 pupils are enrolled.  Horace H.  Cummings, of the General Board.

 

The Genealogical Society of Utah

 

The Genealogical Society of Utah was organized at a meeting held in the office  of Franklin D. Richards, Church historian, November 13, 1894. It was decided by  those present to organize a society the purposes of which were “to be benevolent  in collecting, compiling, establishing and maintaining a genealogical library  for the use and benefit of its members and others; educational in disseminating  information regarding genealogical matters; and also religious.”

 

The officers consist of a board of seven directors, and a president,  vice-president, secretary, treasurer and librarian, who were to be selected from  among the board of directors. The original members were Wilford Woodruff, George  Q. Cannon, Joseph F. Smith, Lorenzo Snow, Franklin D. Richards, John Nicholson,  Amos Milton Musser, James H. Anderson, James B. Walkley, Abraham H. Cannon,  George Reynolds, John Jacques and Duncan M. McAllister.

 

A room in the historian’s office was tendered by Historian Franklin D. Richards,  for the use of the society “until such time as circumstances required a change  of location, the use of said room to be free of charge.”

 

Franklin D. Richards was chosen as president of the society; John Nicholson,  vice-president; James H. Anderson, secretary; Amos Milton Musser, treasurer;  John Jacques, librarian. These, with Andrew Jenson, formed the board of  directors.

 

At the third meeting of the society, November 20, 1894, articles of  incorporation were prepared and the society was duly incorporated. The first  books received by the society were also donated by the charter members at this  meeting, consisting of eleven volumes. This was the nucleus of a library which,  it is hoped by its members, is destined to become second to none in the world.

 

At the beginning of the year 1895, the society had twenty-eight life members and  twenty annual members. At the close of the year 1907 there were one hundred and  eight life members and sixty-five annual members and the library contained  sixteen hundred volumes. In the year 1908 the society took on new life, an  impetus was given to the work of salvation for the dead and the people commenced  to give greater attention to the gathering of the records of their ancestors.  The volume of business during the years 1908 through 9 was greater than that which had  been accomplished during the previous existence of the society. The work of the  society was extensively advertised and was placed on a firm footing. At the  close of the year 1921, there had been issued 3,100 life memberships, 6,512  annual memberships, including renewals, and the library contained 6,500 volumes.

 

The Genealogical Society of Utah is a Church institution. It is not confined to  the borders of Utah, but is as extensive in its field of activity as is the  Church. It was organized for the purpose of aiding the members of the Church in  the collecting and compiling of the records of their dead preparatory to the  performance of ordinance work for their salvation in the temples of the Lord.

 

 Appendix: General Authorities of the Church

 

Presidents of the Church

 

Joseph Smith

 

Born Dec. 23, 1805, at Sharon, Vermont; received the Melchizedek Priesthood from  Peter, James and John in 1820; sustained April, 1830, as First Elder and Oliver  Cowdery as Second Elder of the Church, at the age of 24; sustained January 25,  1832, as President of the High Priesthood at a conference at Amherst, Lorain  County, Ohio; murdered June 27, 1844, at Carthage Jail, Illinois.

 

Brigham Young

 

Born June 1, 1801, at Whittingham, Vermont; ordained an apostle Feb. 14, 1835,  by Joseph Smith and the three witnesses of the Book of Mormon; sustained Dec.  27, 1847, as President of the Church, at the age of 46; died Aug. 29, 1877, at  Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

John Taylor

 

Born Nov. 1, 1808, at Milnthorpe, England; ordained an apostle Dec. 19, 1838,  under the hands of Brigham Young and Heber C. Kimball; sustained Oct. 10, 1880,  as President of the Church, at the age of 72; died July 25, 1887, at Kaysville,  Davis County, Utah.

 

Wilford Woodruff

 

Born March 1, 1807, at Avon, Connecticut; ordained an apostle April 26, 1839, by  Brigham Young; sustained April 7, 1889, as President of the Church, at the age  of 82; died Sept. 2, 1898, at San Francisco, California.

 

Lorenzo Snow

 

Born April 3, 1814, at Mantua, Ohio; ordained an apostle Feb. 12, 1849, by Heber  C. Kimball; sustained Sept. 13, 1898, as President of the Church, at the age of  84; died Oct. 10, 1901, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Joseph F. Smith

 

Born Nov. 13, 1838, at Far West, Missouri; ordained an apostle July 1, 1866, by  Brigham Young, and set apart as one of the twelve apostles Oct. 8, 1867;  sustained Oct. 17, 1901, as President of the Church, at the age of 63; died Nov.  19, 1918, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Heber J. Grant

 

Born Nov. 22, 1856, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle by George Q.  Cannon, October 16, 1882; sustained Nov. 23, 1918, as President of the Church,  at the age of 63.

 

First Counselors in the First Presidency

 

Sidney Rigdon

 

Born Feb. 19, 1793, at St. Clair, Pennsylvania; ordained a high priest by Joseph  Smith and set apart March 18, 1833, as first counselor in the First Presidency  by Joseph Smith, at the age of 40; excommunicated Sept. 8, 1844; died July 14,  1876, at Friendship, Alleghany County, New York.

 

Heber C. Kimball

 

Born June 14, 1801, at Sheldon, Vermont; ordained an apostle Feb. 14, 1835,  under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris; sustained  Dec. 27, 1847, as first counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 46;  died June 22, 1868, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

George A. Smith

 

Born June 26, 1817, at Potsdam, New York; ordained an apostle April 26, 1839, by  Heber C. Kimball; sustained October 6, 1868, as first counselor in the First  Presidency, at the age of 51; died Sept. 1, 1875, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

John W. Young

 

Born Oct. 1, 1844, at Nauvoo, Illinois; sustained Oct. 7, 1876, as first  counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 32; retired at the death of  Brigham Young.

 

George Q. Cannon

 

Born Jan. 11, 1827, at Liverpool, England; ordained an apostle Aug. 26, 1860, by  Brigham Young; sustained Oct. 10, 1880, as first counselor in the First  Presidency, at the age of 62; sustained April 7, 1889, as first counselor to  President Woodruff and also to President Lorenzo Snow, Sept. 13, 1898; died  April 12, 1901, at Monterey, California.

 

John R. Winder

 

Born Dec. 11, 1821, at Biddenden, England; ordained a high priest March 4, 1872,  by Edward Hunter; sustained Oct. 17, 1901, as first counselor in the First  Presidency, at the age of 80; died March 27, 1910, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Anthon H. Lund

 

Born May 15, 1844, at Aalborg, Denmark; ordained an apostle Oct. 7, 1889, by  George Q. Cannon; sustained April 7, 1910, as first counselor in the First  Presidency, at the age of 66; died March 2, 1921, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Charles W. Penrose

 

Born Feb. 4, 1832, at London, England; ordained an apostle July 7, 1904, by  Joseph F. Smith; sustained March 10, 1921, as first counselor in the First  Presidency, at the age of 89.

 

Second Counselors in the First Presidency

 

Fred’k G. Williams

 

Born Oct. 28, 1787, at Suffield, Connecticut; called by revelation March, 1832,  to be a high priest and counselor to Joseph Smith; ordained and set apart March  18, 1833, as second counselor in the First Presidency by Joseph Smith, at the  age of 46; rejected Nov. 7, 1837; died Oct. 10, 1842, at Quincy, Illinois.

 

Hyrum Smith

 

Born Feb. 9, 1800, at Tunbridge, Vermont; ordained a high priest June 6, 1831,  by Joseph Smith; chosen as second counselor in the First Presidency, Nov. 7,  1837, at the age of 37; called to be Patriarch Jan. 24, 1841; murdered June 27,  1844, at Carthage, Illinois.

 

William Law

 

Born Sept. 8, 1809; ordained and set apart Jan. 24, 1841, as second counselor in  the First Presidency, at the age of 32, excommunicated April 18, 1844; died Jan.  19, 1892, at Shullsburg, Wisconsin.

 

Willard Richards

 

Born June 24, 1804, at Hopkinton, Massachusetts; ordained an apostle April 14,  1840, by Brigham Young; sustained Dec. 27, 1847, as second counselor in the  First Presidency, at the age of 43; died March 11, 1854, at Salt Lake City,  Utah.

 

Jedediah M. Grant

 

Born Feb. 21, 1816, at Windsor, New York; set apart as second counselor in the  First Presidency, April 7, 1854, at the age of 38; died Dec. 1, 1856, at Salt  Lake City, Utah.

 

Daniel H. Wells

 

Born Oct. 27, 1814, at Trenton, New York; ordained an apostle and set apart as  second counselor in the First Presidency, January 4, 1857, by Brigham Young, at  the age of 43; retired at the death of President Young; died March 24, 1891, at  Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Joseph F. Smith

 

Born Nov. 13, 1838, at Far West, Missouri; set apart as one of the twelve  apostles Oct. 8, 1867; sustained Oct. 10, 1880, as second counselor to President  John Taylor, at the age of 41; also sustained as second counselor to President  Wilford Woodruff, April 7, 1889, and to President Lorenzo Snow, Sept. 13, 1898;  sustained as President of the Church Oct. 17, 1901; died Nov. 19, 1918, at Salt  Lake City, Utah.

 

Anthon H. Lund

 

Born May 15, 1844, at Aalborg, Denmark; ordained an apostle Oct. 7, 1889, by  George Q. Cannon; sustained as second counselor in the First Presidency, Oct.  17, 1901, at the age of 51; advanced to first counselor April 7, 1910; died  March 2, 1921, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

John Henry Smith

 

Born Sept. 18, 1848, at Carbunca, Iowa; ordained an apostle Oct. 27, 1880, by  Wilford Woodruff; sustained April 7, 1910, as second counselor in the First  Presidency, at the age of 62; died Oct. 13, 1911, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Charles W. Penrose

 

Born Feb. 4, 1832, at London, England; ordained an apostle July 7, 1904, by  Joseph F. Smith; sustained Dec. 7, 1911, as second counselor in the First  Presidency, at the age of 79; advanced to first counselor March 10, 1921.

 

Anthony W. Ivins

 

Born Sept. 16, 1852, at Toms River, New Jersey; ordained an apostle Oct. 6,  1907, by Joseph F. Smith; sustained as second counselor in the First Presidency,  March 10, 1921, at the age of 68.

 

The Apostles of the Church

 

Thomas B. Marsh

 

Born Nov. 1, 1799, at Acton, Massachusetts; ordained an apostle April 26, 1835,  at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris,  at the age of 36; President of the council of apostles; excommunicated for  apostasy March 17, 1839; returned to the Church in 1857; died in 1860 at Ogden,  Utah.

 

David W. Patten

 

Born in 1800, at Theresa, New York; ordained an apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at  Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at  the age of 35; shot Oct. 25, 1838, at the Battle of Crooked River, Missouri.

 

Brigham Young

 

Born June 1, 1801, at Whittingham, Vermont; ordained an apostle Feb. 14, 1835,  at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris,  at the age of 34; President of the council of apostles; sustained Dec. 27, 1847,  as President of the Church; died Aug. 29, 1877, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Heber C. Kimball

 

Born June 14, 1801, at Sheldon, Vermont; ordained an apostle Feb. 14, 1835, at  Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at  the age of 34; died June 22, 1868, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Orson Hyde

 

Born Jan. 8, 1805, at Oxford, Connecticut; ordained an apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at  Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at  the age of 30; died Nov. 28, 1878, at Spring City, Utah.

 

William E. McLellin

 

Born 1806, in Tennessee; ordained an apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at Kirtland, under  the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 29;  excommunicated May 11, 1838; died April 24, 1883, at Independence, Jackson  County, Missouri.

 

Parley P. Pratt

 

Born April 12, 1807, at Burlington, New York; ordained an apostle Feb. 21, 1835,  at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris,  at the age of 28; assassinated May 13, 1857, at Van Buren, Arkansas.

 

Luke S. Johnson

 

Born Nov. 3, 1807, at Pomfret, Vermont; ordained an apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at  Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at  the age of 28; excommunicated April 13, 1838; returned to the Church, and died  Dec. 9, 1861, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

William B. Smith

 

Born March 13, 1811, at Royalton, Vermont; ordained an apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at  Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at  the age of 24; excommunicated Oct. 12, 1845; died Nov. 13, 1893, at Osterdock,  Clayton County, Iowa.

 

Orson Pratt

 

Born Sept. 19, 1811, at Hartford, New York; ordained an apostle April 26, 1835,  under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at Kirtland,  at the age of 24; died Oct. 3, 1881, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

John F. Boynton

 

Born Sept. 20, 1811, at Bradford, Massachusetts; ordained an apostle Feb. 15,  1835, at Kirtland under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin  Harris, at the age of 24; excommunicated; died Oct. 20, 1890, at Syracuse, New  York.

 

Lyman E. Johnson

 

Born Oct. 24, 1811, at Pomfret, Vermont; ordained an apostle Feb. 14, 1835, at  Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at  the age of 24; excommunicated April 13, 1838; died Dec. 20, 1856, at Prairie du  Chien, Wisconsin.

 

John E. Page

 

Born Feb. 25, 1799, at Trenton, New York; ordained an apostle Dec. 19. 1838, at  Far West, under the hands of Brigham Young and Heber C. Kimball, at the age of  39; excommunicated June 27, 1846; died in the fall of 1867, at De Kalb County,  Illinois.

 

John Taylor

 

Born Nov. 1, 1808, at Milnthorpe, England; ordained an apostle Dec. 19, 1838, at  Far West, under the hands of Brigham Young and Heber C. Kimball, at the age of  30; President of the council of apostles; sustained as President of the Church  Oct. 10, 1880; died July 25, 1887, at Kaysville, Utah.

 

Wilford Woodruff

 

Born March 1, 1807, at Avon, Connecticut; ordained an apostle April 26, 1839, at  Far West, by Brigham Young, at the age of 32; President of the council of  apostles; sustained as President of the Church April 7, 1889; died Sept. 2,  1898, at San Francisco, California.

 

George A. Smith

 

Born June 26, 1817, at Potsdam, New York; ordained an apostle April 26, 1839, at  Far West, by Heber C. Kimball, at the age of 22; advanced to be first counselor  in the First Presidency, Oct. 6, 1868; died Sept. 1, 1875, at Salt Lake City,  Utah.

 

Willard Richards

 

Born June 24, 1804, at Hopkinton, Massachusetts; ordained an apostle April 14,  1840, at Preston, Lancashire, England, by Brigham Young, at the age of 36;  advanced to be second counselor in the First Presidency, Dec. 27, 1847; died  March 11, 1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Lyman Wight

 

Born May 9, 1796, at Fairfield, New York; ordained an apostle April 8, 1841, by  Joseph Smith, at Nauvoo, at the age of 44; excommunicated Feb. 12, 1849; died  March 31, 1858, in Mountain Valley, Texas.

 

Amasa M. Lyman

 

Born March 30, 1813, at Lyman, New Hampshire; ordained an apostle Aug. 20, 1842,  at Nauvoo, by Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball and George A. Smith, at the age of  29; deprived of apostleship Oct. 8, 1867; excommunicated May 12, 1870; died Feb.  4, 1877, at Fillmore, Millard County, Utah.

 

Ezra T. Benson

 

Born Feb. 22, 1811, at Mendon, Massachusetts; ordained an apostle July 16, 1846,  at Council Bluffs, by Brigham Young, at the age of 35; died Sept. 3, 1869, at  Ogden, Utah.

 

Charles C. Rich

 

Born Aug. 21, 1809, at Campbell County, Kentucky; ordained an apostle Feb. 12,  1849, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Brigham Young, at the age of 40; died Nov. 17,  1883, at Paris, Idaho.

 

Lorenzo Snow

 

Born April 3, 1814, at Mantua, Ohio; ordained an apostle Feb. 12, 1849, at Salt  Lake City, Utah, by Heber C. Kimball, at the age of 36; President of the council  of the apostles; sustained as President of the Church Sept. 13, 1898; died Oct.  10, 1901, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Erastus Snow

 

Born Nov. 9, 1818, at St. Johnsbury. Vermont; ordained an apostle Feb. 12, 1849,  at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Brigham Young, at the age of 31; died May 27, 1888,  at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Franklin D. Richards

 

Born April 2, 1821, at Richmond, Massachusetts; ordained an apostle Feb. 12,  1849, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Heber C. Kimball, at the age of 28; President  of the council of apostles; died Dec. 9, 1899, at Ogden, Utah.

 

George Q. Cannon

 

Born Jan. 11, 1827, at Liverpool, England; ordained an apostle Aug. 26, 1860, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, by Brigham Young, at the age of 33; advanced to be first  counselor in the First Presidency, Oct. 10, 1880; died April 12, 1901, at  Monterey, California.

 

Joseph F. Smith

 

Born Nov. 13, 1838, at Far West, Missouri; ordained an apostle July 1, 1866, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, by Brigham Young; set apart as one of the twelve apostles  Oct. 8, 1867, at the age of 29; sustained as President of the Church Oct. 17,  1901; died Nov. 19. 1918, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Brigham Young, Jr

 

Born Dec. 18, 1836, at Kirtland, Ohio; ordained an apostle Feb. 4, 1864, by  Brigham Young and set apart as one of the twelve apostles Oct. 9, 1868, at the  age of 32; President of the council of apostles; died April 11, 1903, at Salt  Lake City, Utah.

 

Albert Carrington

 

Born Jan. 8, 1813, at Royalton, Vermont; ordained an apostle July 3, 1870, by  Brigham Young at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 57; excommunicated Nov. 7,  1885; died Sept. 19, 1889, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Moses Thatcher

 

Born Feb. 2, 1842, at Sangamon County, Illinois; ordained an apostle April 9,  1879, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by John Taylor, at the age of 37; dropped from  the council of the apostles April 6, 1896; died Aug. 21, 1909.

 

Francis M. Lyman

 

Born Jan. 12, 1840, at McComb, Illinois; ordained an apostle Oct. 27, 1880, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, by John Taylor, at the age of 40; President of the council  of apostles; died Nov. 18, 1916, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

John Henry Smith

 

Born Sept. 18, 1848, at Carbunca, Iowa; ordained an apostle Oct. 27, 1880, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, by Wilford Woodruff, at the age of 32; advanced to be  second counselor in the First Presidency, April 7, 1910; died Oct. 13, 1911, at  Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

George Teasdale

 

Born Dec. 8. 1831, at London, England; ordained an apostle Oct. 16, 1882, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, by John Taylor, at the age of 51; died June 9, 1907, at  Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Heber J. Grant

 

Born Nov. 22, 1856, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle Oct. 16, 1882,  by George Q. Cannon, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 26; President of the  council of apostles; sustained as President of the Church Nov. 23, 1918.

 

John W. Taylor

 

Born May 15, 1858, at Provo, Utah; ordained an apostle April 9, 1884, by John  Taylor, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 26; resigned Oct. 6, 1905;  excommunicated March 28, 1911; died Oct. 10, 1916, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Marriner W. Merrill

 

Born Sept. 25, 1832, at Sackville, New Brunswick; ordained an apostle Oct. 7,  1889, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Wilford Woodruff, at the age of 57; died Feb.  6, 1906, at Richmond, Cache County, Utah.

 

Anthon H. Lund

 

Born May 15, 1844, at Aalborg, Denmark; ordained an apostle Oct. 7, 1889 by  George Q. Cannon at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 45; President of the  council of apostles; advanced to second counselor in the First Presidency, Oct.  17, 1901; to first counselor in Presidency, April 7, 1910; died March 2, 1921.

 

Abraham H. Cannon

 

Born March 12, 1859, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle Oct. 7, 1889,  by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 30; died July 19,  1896, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Matthias F. Cowley

 

Born Aug. 25, 1858, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle Oct. 7, 1897,  by George Q. Cannon at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 39; resigned Oct. 28,  1905.

 

Abraham O. Woodruff

 

Born Nov. 23, 1872, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle Oct. 7, 1897,  by Wilford Woodruff, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 25; died June 20,  1904, at El Paso, Texas.

 

Rudger Clawson

 

Born March 12, 1857, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle Oct. 10, 1898,  by Lorenzo Snow, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 41; President of the  council of apostles.

 

Reed Smoot

 

Born Jan. 10, 1862, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle April 8, 1900,  by Lorenzo Snow, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 38.

 

Hyrum Mack Smith

 

Born March 21, 1872, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle Oct. 24, 1901,  by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 29; died Jan. 23,  1918, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

George Albert Smith

 

Born April 4, 1870, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle Oct. 8, 1903,  by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 33.

 

Charles W. Penrose

 

Born Feb. 4, 1832, at London, England; ordained an apostle July 7, 1904, by  Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 72; advanced to be  second counselor in the First Presidency, Dec. 7, 1911; advanced to be first  counselor in the First Presidency, March 10, 1921.

 

George F. Richards

 

Born Feb. 23, 1861, at Farmington, Utah; ordained an apostle April 9, 1906, by  Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 45.

 

Orson F. Whitney

 

Born July 1, 1855, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle April 9, 1906,  by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 50.

 

David O. McKay

 

Born Sept. 8, 1873, at Huntsville, Utah; ordained an apostle April 9, 1906, by  Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 32.

 

Anthony W. Ivins

 

Born Sept. 16, 1852, at Toms River, New Jersey; ordained an apostle Oct. 6,  1907, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 55; advanced to  be second counselor in the First Presidency, March 10, 1921.

 

Joseph Fielding Smith

 

Born July 19, 1876, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an apostle April 7, 1910,  by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 33.

 

James E. Talmage

 

Born Sept. 21, 1862, at Hungerford, Berkshire, England; ordained an apostle Dec.  8, 1911, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 49.

 

Stephen L. Richards

 

Born June 18, 1879, at Mendon, Cache County, Utah; ordained an apostle Jan. 17,  1917, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 37.

 

Richard R. Lyman

 

Born Nov. 23, 1870, at Fillmore, Utah; ordained an apostle April 7, 1918, by  Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 47.

 

Melvin J. Ballard

 

Born Feb. 9, 1873, at Logan, Utah; ordained an apostle Jan. 7, 1919, by Heber J.  Grant, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 45.

 

John A. Widtsoe

 

Born Jan. 31, 1872, on the Island of Troyen, Norway; ordained an apostle March  17, 1921, by Heber J. Grant, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 49.

 

Presiding Patriarchs

 

Joseph Smith, Sen.

 

Born July 12, 1771, at Topsfield, Essex County, Mass.; ordained presiding  patriarch of the Church, Dec. 18, 1833, under the hands of Joseph Smith, Oliver  Cowdery, Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G. Williams; died Sept. 14, 1840, at  Nauvoo, Illinois.

 

Hyrum Smith

 

Born Feb. 9, 1800, at Tunbridge, Orange County, Vermont; ordained presiding  patriarch of the Church Jan. 24, 1841, by Joseph Smith; murdered June 27, 1844,  at Carthage Jail, Illinois.

 

John Smith

 

Born July 16, 1781, at Derryfield, Rockingham County, New Hampshire; ordained a  patriarch Jan. 10, 1844, at Nauvoo, by Joseph Smith; set apart as presiding  patriarch of the Church, Jan. 1, 1849, at Salt Lake City, Utah; died May 23,  1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

John Smith

 

Born Sept. 22, 1832, at Kirtland, Ohio; ordained presiding patriarch of the  Church Feb. 18, 1855, by Brigham Young at Salt Lake City, Utah; died Nov. 6,  1911, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Hyrum G. Smith

 

Born July 8, 1879, at South Jordan, Salt Lake County, Utah; ordained a seventy  Feb. 11, 1907, by George G. Bywater; ordained a high priest and presiding  patriarch of the Church May 9, 1912, by Joseph F. Smith at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

First Seven Presidents of Seventies

 

Hazen Aldrich

 

Chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of seventies Feb. 28,  1835, at Kirtland; released April 6, 1837, previously having been ordained a  high priest.

 

Joseph Young

 

Born April 7, 1797, at Hopkinton, Middlesex County, Mass.; chosen and ordained  one of the first seven presidents of seventies Feb. 28, 1835, at Kirtland, at  the age of 37; died July 16, 1881, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Levi W. Hancock

 

Born April 7, 1803, at Old Springfield, Hampden County, Mass.; chosen and  ordained one of the first seven presidents of seventies Feb. 28, 1835, at  Kirtland, at the age of 31; died June 10, 1882, at Washington, Washington  County, Utah.

 

Zebedee Coltrin

 

Born Sept. 7, 1804, at Ovid, Seneca County, New York; chosen and ordained one of  the first seven presidents of seventies Feb. 28, 1835, at Kirtland, at the age  of 30; released April 6, 1837, previously having been ordained a high priest;  died July 21, 1887, at Spanish Fork, Utah.

 

Leonard Rich

 

Chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of seventies Feb. 28,  1835, at Kirtland; released April 6, 1837, previously having been ordained a  high priest.

 

Lyman Sherman

 

Chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of seventies Feb. 28,  1835, at Kirtland; released April 6, 1837, previously having been ordained a  high priest.

 

Sylvester Smith

 

Chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of seventies Feb. 28,  1835, at Kirtland; released April 6, 1837, previously having been ordained a  high priest.

 

John Gould

 

Ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 6,  1837, at Kirtland; released Sept. 3, 1837, previously having been ordained a  high priest.

 

James Foster

 

Born April 1, 1775; ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first seven  presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland; died Dec. 21, 1841, at Morgan County,  Utah.

 

Daniel S. Miles

 

Ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 6,  1837, at Kirtland; died in 1845, in Hancock County, Illinois.

 

Josiah Butterfield

 

Born in the State of Maine; ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first  seven presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland; excommunicated Oct. 7, 1844; died  at Monterey County, California.

 

Salmon Gee

 

Born Oct. 16, 1792, at Lyme, New London County, Conn.; ordained a seventy and  set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland, at  the age of 43; seventies withdrew their fellowship from Brother Gee, March 6,  1838; died Sept. 13, 1845, at Ambrosia, Lee County, Iowa.

 

John Gaylord

 

Born July 12, 1797; ordained a seventy Dec. 20, 1836; set apart as one of the  first seven presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland, at the age of 39;  excommunicated Jan. 13, 1838; rejoined the Church at Nauvoo.

 

Henry Harriman

 

Born June 9, 1804, at Rowley (now Georgetown), Essex County, Mass.; ordained a  seventy in 1835; set apart as one of the first seven presidents Feb. 6, 1838, at  Kirtland, at the age of 33; died May 17, 1891, at Huntington, Emery County,  Utah.

 

Zera Pulsipher

 

Born June 24, 1789, at Rockingham, Windham County, Vermont; ordained a seventy  and set apart as one of the first seven presidents March 6, 1838, at Kirtland,  at the age of 48; released April 12, 1862; died Jan. 1, 1872, at Hebron,  Washington County, Utah.

 

Albert P. Rockwood

 

Born June 5, 1805, at Holliston, Middlesex County, Mass.; ordained a seventy  Jan. 5, 1839, at Kirtland; set apart as one of the first seven presidents Dec.  2, 1845, at Nauvoo, at the age of 40; died Nov. 26, 1879, at Sugar House, Salt  Lake Co., Utah.

 

Benjamin L. Clapp

 

Born Aug. 19, 1814, in Alabama; ordained and set apart president of the 8th  quorum of seventy Oct. 20, 1844; set apart as one of the first seven presidents  Dec. 2, 1845, at Nauvoo, at the age of 31; died in 1860, in California.

 

Horace S. Eldredge

 

Born Feb. 6, 1816, at Brutus, Cayuga County, New York; ordained a seventy and  set apart as one of the first seven presidents in 1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah,  at the age of 38; died Sept. 6, 1888, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Jacob Gates

 

Born March 9, 1811, in St. Johnsbury, Caledonia County, Vermont; ordained a  seventy and set apart as one of the first seven presidents in Oct. 1862, at Salt  Lake City, Utah, at the age of 51; died April 14, 1892, at Provo, Utah.

 

John Van Cott

 

Born Sept. 7, 1814, at Canaan, Columbia County, New York; ordained a seventy,  Feb. 25, 1847; set apart as one of the first seven presidents in Oct. 1862, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 48; died Feb. 18, 1883, at Salt Lake City,  Utah.

 

William W. Taylor

 

Born Sept. 11, 1853, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a seventy and set apart  as one of the first seven presidents April 6, 1880, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at  the age of 26; died Aug. 1, 1884, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Abraham H. Cannon

 

Born March 12, 1859, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a seventy and set apart  as one of the first seven presidents Oct. 9, 1882, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at  the age of 23; called to the apostleship Oct. 7, 1889; died July 19, 1896, at  Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Seymour B. Young

 

Born Oct. 3, 1837, at Kirtland, Ohio; ordained a seventy Feb. 18, 1857; set  apart as one of the first seven presidents Oct. 14, 1882, at Salt Lake City,  Utah, at the age of 45.

 

C. D. Fjeldsted

 

Born Feb. 20, 1829, at Sundbyvester, Copenhagen, Denmark; ordained a seventy  Feb. 5, 1859; set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 28, 1884, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 55; died Dec. 23, 1905, at Salt Lake City,  Utah.

 

John Morgan

 

Born Aug. 8, 1842, at Greensburg, Decatur County, Indiana; ordained a seventy  Oct. 8, 1875; set apart as one of the first seven presidents Oct. 1884, at Salt  Lake City, Utah, at the age of 42; died Aug. 14, 1894, at Preston, Idaho.

 

Brigham H. Roberts

 

Born March 13, 1857, at Warrington, Lancashire, England; ordained a seventy  March 8, 1877; set apart as one of the first seven presidents Oct. 8, 1888, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 31.

 

George Reynolds

 

Born Jan. 1, 1842, at Marylebone, London, England; ordained a seventy March 18,  1866; set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 10, 1890, at Salt  Lake City, Utah, at the age of 54; died Aug. 9, 1909, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Jonathan Golden Kimball

 

Born June 9, 1853, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a seventy July 21, 1886;  set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 6, 1892, at Salt Lake City,  Utah, at the age of 38.

 

Rulon S. Wells

 

Born July 7, 1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a seventy Oct. 22, 1875;  set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 5, 1893, at Salt Lake City,  Utah, at the age of 38.

 

Edward Stevenson

 

Born May 1, 1820, at Gibraltar, Spain; ordained a seventy May 1, 1845; set apart  as one of the first seven presidents Oct. 9, 1894, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at  the age of 74; died Jan. 27, 1897, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Joseph W. McMurrin

 

Born Sept. 5, 1858, at Tooele, Tooele County, Utah; ordained a seventy April 21,  1884; sustained in Oct. 1897 and set apart as one of the first seven presidents  Jan. 21, 1898, at Liverpool, England, at the age of 39.

 

Charles H. Hart

 

Born July 5, 1866, at Bloomington, Bear Lake County, Idaho; ordained a seventy  Aug. 10, 1890; set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 8, 1906, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 39.

 

Levi Edgar Young

 

Born Feb. 2, 1874, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a seventy June 18, 1897;  sustained as one of the first seven presidents Oct. 6, 1909; set apart Jan. 23,  1910, at New York, at the age of 36.

 

Presiding Bishops

 

Edward Partridge

 

Born Aug. 27, 1793, at Pittsfield, Berkshire County, Mass.; called by revelation  to be the first bishop of the Church, ordained and set apart Feb. 4, 1831, at  the age of 38; died May 27, 1840, at Nauvoo, Illinois.

 

Newel K. Whitney

 

Born Feb. 5, 1795, at Marlborough, Windham County, Vermont; called by revelation  to be the first bishop of Kirtland; sustained as presiding bishop of the Church  at the conference of April, 1847; died Sept. 23, 1850, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Edward Hunter

 

Born June 22, 1793, at Newton, Delaware County, Penn.; called and sustained as  the presiding bishop of the Church April 7, 1851; ordained and set apart April  11, 1852, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 58; died Oct. 16, 1883, at Salt  Lake City, Utah.

 

William B. Preston

 

Born Nov. 24, 1830, at Halifax, Franklin County, Virginia; ordained a bishop  Nov. 14, 1859; set apart as presiding bishop of the Church April 6, 1884, at  Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 53; died Aug. 2, 1908, at Salt Lake City,  Utah.

 

Charles W. Nibley

 

Born Feb. 5, 1849, at Hunterfield, Midlothian, Scotland; ordained and set apart  as presiding bishop of the Church Dec. 11, 1907, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the  age of 58.

 

 Appendix: Stakes of Zion

 

(In chronological order.) * = discontinued.   Name: Organized, President    *Kirtland: Feb. 17, 1834, Joseph Smith, Jr.   *Clay-Caldwell: July 3, 1834, David Whitmer   *Adam-ondi-Ahman: June 28, 1838, John Smith   *Nauvoo: Oct. 5, 1839, William Marks   *Zarahemla: Oct. 5, 1839, John Smith   *Lima: Oct. 21, 1840, Isaac Morley   *Quincy: Oct. 25, 1840, Daniel Stanton   *Mount Hope: Oct. 27, 1840, Abel Lamb   *Freedom: Oct. 27, 1840, Henry W. Miller   *Geneva: Nov. 1, 1840, William Bosely   *Springfield: Nov. 5, 1840, Edwin P. Merriam   Salt Lake: Oct. 3, 1847, John Smith   Weber: Jan. 26, 1851, Lorin Farr   Utah: Mar. 19, 1851, Abraham O. Smoot   Parowan: May, 1852, John C. L. Smith   *St. Louis: Nov. 4, 1854, Milo Andrus   *Carson Valley: Oct. 4, 1856, Orson Hyde   Cache: Nov. 14, 1859, Peter Maughan   Juab: Sept. 20, 1868, Jacob Bigler   Millard: Mar. 19, 1869, Thomas Callister   Beaver: Mar. 12, 1869, John Murdock   Bear Lake: June 20, 1869, William Budge   Sevier: May 24, 1874, Joseph A. Young   St. George: April 7, 1877, J. D. T. McAllister   Kanab: April 18, 1877, L. John Nuttal   Panguitch: April 23, 1877, James Henrie   *Davis: June 17, 1877, William R. Smith   Tooele: June 24, 1877, Francis M. Lyman   Morgan: July 1, 1877, Willard G. Smith   *Sanpete: July 4, 1877, Canute Peterson   Summit: July 9, 1877, William W. Cluff   Wasatch: July 15, 1877, Abram Hatch   Box Elder: Aug. 19, 1877, Oliver G. Snow   *Little Colorado: Jan. 27, 1878, Lot Smith   *Eastern Arizona: June 29, 1879, Jesse N. Smith   Emery: Aug. 13, 1882, Christen D. Larsen   St. Joseph: Feb. 25, 1883, Christopher Layton   San Juan: Sept. 23, 1883, Platte D. Lyman   San Luis: Oct. 10, 1883, Silas S. Smith   Maricopa: Dec. 10, 1883, Alex F. McDonald   Bannock: Feb. 4, 1884, Lewis S. Pond   Oneida: June 1, 1884, William D. Hendricks   Uintah: May 9, 1887, Samuel R. Bennion   St. Johns: July 23, 1887, David K. Udall   Cassia: Nov. 19, 1887, Horton D. Haight   Snowflake: Dec. 18, 1887, Jesse N. Smith   Malad: Feb. 12, 1888, Oliver C. Hoskins   Star Valley: Aug. 14, 1892, George Osmond   Wayne: May 27, 1893, Willis E. Robison   Alberta: June 9, 1895, Charles O. Card   Bingham: June 9, 1895, James E. Steele   Juarez: Dec. 9, 1895, Anthony W. Ivins   Woodruff: June 5, 1898, John M. Baxter   Fremont: Aug. 6, 1898, Thomas E. Ricks   Pocatello: Aug. 7, 1898, Wm. C. Parkinson   Jordan: Jan. 21, 1900, Orrin P. Miller   Granite: Jan. 27, 1900, Frank Y. Taylor   North Sanpete: Dec. 9, 1900, Christian N. Lund   South Sanpete: Dec. 9, 1900, Canute Peterson   Alpine: Jan. 13, 1901, Stephen L. Chipman   Nebo: Jan. 20, 1901, Jonathan S. Page   Hyrum: April 30, 1901, William C. Parkinson   Benson: May 1, 1901, William H. Lewis   Big Horn: May 26, 1901, Byron Sessions   Union: June 9, 1901, Franklin S. Bramwell   Teton: Sept. 2, 1901, Don Carlos Driggs   Taylor: Aug. 30, 1903, Heber S. Allen   Blackfoot: Jan. 31, 1904, Elias S. Kimball   Liberty: Feb. 26, 1904, Hugh J. Cannon   Pioneer: Mar. 24, 1904, William McLachlin   Ensign: April 1, 1904, Richard W. Young   Rigby: Feb. 2, 1908, Don C. Walker   Ogden: July 26, 1908, Thomas B. Evans   North Weber: Aug. 2, 1908, James Wotherspoon   Bear River: Oct. 11, 1908, Milton H. Welling   Yellowstone: Jan. 10, 1909, Daniel G. Miller   Carbon: May 8, 1910, Gustave A. Iverson   Deseret: Aug. 11, 1912, Alonzo A. Hinckley   Moapa: Sept. 8, 1912, Willard L. Jones   Duchesne: Dec. 2, 1912, William H. Smart   Young: May 21, 1913, David Halls   Boise: Nov. 2, 1913, Heber Q. Hale   Shelley: Aug. 16, 1914, Joseph H. Dye   Cottonwood: Nov. 29, 1914, Uriah G. Miller   Raft River: April 27, 1915, John A. Elison   Curlew: May 17, 1915, Jonathan C. Cutler   North Davis: June 20, 1915, Henry H. Blood   South Davis: June 20, 1915, James H. Robinson   Portneuf: Aug. 14, 1915, George T. Hyde   Idaho: Nov. 19, 1916, Nelson J. Hogan   Montpelier: Dec. 23, 1917, Edward C. Rich   Tintic: April 22, 1917, E. Franklin Birch   Twin Falls: July 26, 1919, Lawrence G. Kirkman   Burley: July 27, 1919, David R. Langlois   Blaine: Aug. 3, 1919, Wm. Lennox Adams   Lost River: Aug. 18, 1919, William N. Patten   Franklin: June 6, 1920, Samuel W. Parkinson   Logan: June 6, 1920, Oliver H. Budge   Roosevelt: June 26, 1920, William H. Smart   Garfield: Aug. 29, 1920, Charles E. Rowan, Jr.   Lethbridge: Nov. 10, 1921, Hugh B. Brown

 

 Appendix: Church Publications

 

(Chronologically arranged with date and place of issue.)   Book of Mormon, 1830, Palmyra, New York. Danish, 1851, Copenhagen, Denmark.     German, 1852, Bern, Switzerland.     French, 1852, Paris, France.     Italian, 1852, London, England.     Welsh, 1852, Myrthyr Tydfil, Wales.     Hawaiian, 1855, San Francisco, California.     Deseret Alphabet, 1869, New York City, New York.     Swedish, 1878, Copenhagen, Denmark.     Spanish, 1886, Salt Lake City, Utah.     Maori, 1889, Auckland, New Zealand.     Dutch, 1890, Amsterdam, Holland.     Samoan, 1903, Salt Lake City, Utah.     Tahitian, 1904, Papeete, Society Islands.     Turkish, 1906, New York City, New York.     Japanese, 1909, Tokyo, Japan.

 

  The Evening and Morning Star , 1832, Independence, Missouri.   Book of Commandments, 1833, Independence, Missouri.   L. D. S. Messenger and Advocate, 1834, Kirtland, Ohio.   Doctrine and Covenants, 1835, Kirtland, Ohio. Danish, 1851, Copenhagen,      Denmark.     Welsh, 1851, Myrthyr Tydfil, Wales.     German, 1876, Bern, Switzerland.     Swedish, 1888, Salt Lake City, Utah.     Dutch, 1908, Rotterdam, Holland.

 

  Hymn Book, 1835, Kirtland, Ohio.   The Elder’s Journal, 1838, Kirtland Ohio.   Times and Seasons, 1839, Commerce, (Nauvoo) Illinois.   The Millennial Star, 1840, Manchester and Liverpool, Eng.   The Gospel Reflecter, 1841, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.   The Wasp, 1842, Nauvoo, Illinois.   The Nauvoo Neighbor, 1843, Nauvoo, Illinois.   The Prophet, 1844, New York City, New York.   The New York Messenger, 1845, New York City, New York.   The California Star, 1846, Yerba Buena, (San Francisco) Cal.   Prophwyd y Jubili, neu, Seren y Saint (Welsh), 1846, Myrthyr Tydfil, Wales.   Udgorn Seion, neu, Seren y Saint  (Welsh), 1849, Myrthyr Tydfil, Wales.   The Frontier Guardian, 1849, Kanesville (Council Bluffs).   The Deseret News, 1850, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Pearl of Great Price, 1851, Liverpool, England. Welsh, 1852, Wales.     German, 1882, Bern, Switzerland.     Danish, 1883, Salt Lake City, Utah.     Dutch, 1911, Rotterdam, Holland.

 

  Skandinaviens Stjerne (Danish), 1851, Copenhagen, Denmark.   Zions Panier (German), 1851 Hamburg, Germany.   L’Étoile du Déséret (French), 1851, Paris, France.   Zion’s Watchman, 1853, Sydney, New South Wales.   Le Réflecteur (French), 1853, Geneva, Switzerland.   The Seer, 1853, Washington, D. C.   Journal of Discourses, 1853, Liverpool, England.   L. D. S. Millennial Star and Monthly Visitor, 1854, Madras, India.   St. Louis Luminary, 1854, St. Louis, Missouri.   The Mormon, 1855, New York City, New York.   The Western Standard, 1856, San Francisco, California.   Der Darsteller (German), 1856, Geneva, Switzerland.   Die Reform (German), 1862, Geneva, Switzerland.   Juvenile Instructor, 1866, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Der Stern (German), 1869, Zurich, Switzerland.   The Woman’s Exponent, 1872, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Utah Posten (Danish and Norwegian), 1873, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Bikuben (Danish and Norwegian), 1876, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Nordstjernan, 1877, Göteborg, Sweden.   The Contributor, 1879, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Ungdommens Raadgiver (Danish and Norwegian), 1880, Copenhagen, Denmark.   Morgenstjernen (Danish and Norwegian), 1882, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Church and Farm, 1885, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Svenska Harolden, 1885, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Historical Record, 1886, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Young Woman’s Journal, 1889, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Truth’s Reflex, 1889, St. John, Kansas.   Der Beobachter (German), 1890, Salt Lake City, Utah.   De Ster (Dutch), 1896, Rotterdam, Holland.   Improvement Era, 1897, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Southern Star, 1898, Chattanooga, Tennessee.   Utah Posten (Swedish), 1900, Salt Lake City, Utah.   Children’s Friend, 1902, Salt Lake City, Utah.   The Elders’ Journal, 1903, Atlanta, Georgia.   The Messenger, 1907, Auckland, New Zealand.   Liahona, 1907, Independence, Missouri.   Ka Elele Oiaio, 1909, Honolulu, Hawaii.

 

 Appendix: List of Authorities and Books of Reference

 

  Journal History (Manuscript) , 1830 through 1921.   Far West Record (Manuscript) .   Evening and Morning Star, 1832 through 1834.   Messenger and Advocate, 1834  through 1836.   Times and Seasons, 1839  through 1846.   Millennial Star, 1840 through  1921.   Documentary History of the Church , vols. 1 through 6.   Missouri Persecutions, Parley P. Pratt.   Era of the Protestant Revolution , Frederick Seebohm.   The Rise of the Dutch Republic , John Lathrop Motley.   The British Nation, George M. Wrong.   Topsfield Historical Collections , vols. 1 through 8.   The Mack Genealogy, Sophia Smith Martin.   Five Colonial Families, vols. 1 through 2.   History of the Prophet Joseph , Lucy Mack Smith.   Orson Pratt’s Works, Orson Pratt.   History of the Church, Juvenile Instructor, vols. 7 through 19.   The Contributor, vol. 17.    Improvement Era, vols. 1  through 24.   Deseret News, 1850 through  1921.   M. I. A. Manual, 1918 through 1919.   Life of Joseph Smith, George Q. Cannon.   Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt .   Life of Heber C. Kimball, Orson F. Whitney.   Life of John Taylor, Brigham H. Roberts.   Wilford Woodruff, His Life and Labors, M. F. Cowley.   Biography of Lorenzo Snow, Eliza R. Snow.   History of the Mormon Church (Americana), B. H. Roberts.   History of Utah, Orson F. Whitney.   Whitney’s Popular History of Utah , Orson F. Whitney.   History of Utah, H. H. Bancroft.   Women of Mormondom, Edward W. Tullidge.   Historical Record, Andrew Jenson.   Church Chronology, Andrew Jenson.   Missouri Persecutions, Brigham H. Roberts.   Rise and Fall of Nauvoo, Brigham H. Roberts.   A Brief History of the Church , Edward H. Anderson.   The Mormon Battalion, Daniel Tyler.   Conquest of New Mexico and California, Col. P. St. George Cooke.   The Restoration of the Gospel , Osborne J. P. Widtsoe.   One Hundred Years of Mormonism , John Henry Evans.